ROW Improvement Plan Book

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ROW Improvement Plan Book RIGHTS OF WAY Improvement Plan 2007-2011 Photograph © RNRP Foreword 2 Introduction 3 CONTENTS Background 4 Rights of Way Improvement Plans 5 Northamptonshire 7 Other Strategies and Plans 8 Local Transport Plan 2006/07 – 2010/11 11 Safer Cleaner Greener and Local Delivery 13 Assessment of the Current Network - The Access Network 14 Assessment of the Current Network - Network Assessment 18 Assessment of People’s Needs and Demands 31 Key Issues 32 Highlights of the Needs and Demands Survey 33 The Action Plan 35 Appendix A – Assessment of Potential Short Circular Walks 62 Appendix B – Potential Inter-Village Routes 68 FOREWORD 2 Welcome to the which there are proposals to deliver significant Northamptonshire Rights urban expansion around the major towns which will of Way Improvement include a great deal of associated infrastructure Plan. such as new roads, education facilities and leisure opportunities. Our Rights of Way team is fully We have a tremendous committed to achieve as much as possible in asset in the network of partnership with the growth area delivery bodies public rights of way here and as you will read, great importance has been in Northamptonshire, placed on this subject within this plan’s Statement and I am delighted to of Action. introduce our plan for the coming years that I would like to personally thank everyone who sets out how we will contributed to the production of this plan, especially prioritise our actions to bring about improvements all those who took part in the initial surveys in 2004 for all members of the community. and everyone who completed feedback on the Draft Plan launched at the 2005 Northampton I know how important this network is to everyone Balloon Festival. I would also like to thank all the who uses our rights of way – remember how volunteers that have helped make the county’s people were affected during the Foot and Mouth rights of way network such a valuable asset. Disease crisis in 2001. To back up this view, the Without their input our job would have been made research commissioned by the Rights of Way team much more difficult and we could have lost touch has shown that local accessible paths are what with our communities which are our life blood. residents really wish to be maintained. We can deliver this in the next few years with the support of My hope is that this plan, allied to the provisions of our farmers and landowners in ways that match the Local Transport Plan will result in significant both the needs of the community and the changing improvement in accessibility throughout the county face of agriculture and access to the countryside. as well as having environmental benefits and contributing to the promotion of good health for the I hope that the plan can help us to improve the people of Northamptonshire. profile of Northamptonshire County Council by means of improved promotion, publicity and In the meantime I would very much like to express branding to ensure that our services are recognised my personal appreciation of all those involved in and appreciated by members of the public. If we pursuing these objectives which I have no doubt will provide attractive and well maintained access, our provide a good positive contribution to the standing in the community will be raised. wellbeing of the County. We have a particularly important challenge in Northamptonshire by being a major part of the Bob Seery Milton Keynes and South Midlands Growth Area in Cabinet Member with responsibility for Highways and Transport Photograph © RNRP INTRODUCTION 3 Welcome to the Northamptonshire Rights of We have put an electronic version on our website Way Improvement Plan (ROWIP). www.northamptonshire.gov.uk This strategic document explains how For further information please contact: Northamptonshire County Council as highway authority will identify, manage and deliver Richard Hall improvements to its local rights of way and access Rights of Way Manager to the countryside over the next 4 years. Sustainable Transport Northamptonshire County Council Since the draft version of this plan was circulated in Riverside House August 2005, many of the comments, suggestions Bedford Road and priorities have been incorporated in this docu- NORTHAMPTON ment. These have allowed us to: NN1 5NX 1 Check that the findings of the research Telephone: 01604 654352 were right Email: [email protected] 2 Consider people’s views on our proposed actions 3 Prioritise proposed actions in the approved Plan 4 Identify and deliver a series of ‘quick wins’ to achieve important improvements BACKGROUND - What are Public Rights of Way? 4 Natural England and Defra have the following information on their websites: England has about 190,000 km (118,000 miles) of footpaths, bridleways, byways and other rights of way. They are the most important way for visitors to enjoy the countryside, and are also useful for local people to get to the shops, school and work. Definitions: Footpath open to walkers only, waymarked with a yellow arrow Bridleway open to cyclists, horseriders and walkers, waymarked with a blue arrow Restricted Byway open to cyclists, horseriders, carriage drivers and walkers, waymarked with a plum coloured arrow Byway Open to All Traffic (BOAT) open to all walkers, cyclists, riders and motor vehicles, waymarked with a red/orange arrow BACKGROUND - Rights of Way Improvement Plans 5 The Countryside and Rights of Way (CRoW) In November 2002 further guidance was issued Act 2000 places a duty on every Local Highway from DEFRA which provided local highway Authority to prepare and publish and Rights of authorities with greater detail on what was expected Way Improvement Plan (ROWIP) by November to be contained within the ROWIP process. The 2007. guidance given by DEFRA includes the following: A ROWIP is a strategic document which is a means In making the assessments under section 60(1) and for the local highway authorities to identify and 60(3)(a) of the CRoW Act, local authorities should propose the management of improving public rights consider the needs and circumstances of people of way and access to the countryside. Plans should with a range of expectations, interests and levels of be reviewed at least every 10 years. ability, also they should take in to account the needs of both local people and visitors to the area. The CRoW Act 2000 requires every local highway Examples of what local highway authorities should authority to assess consider are: The extent to which local rights of way meet Access to and within attractive areas which the present and likely future needs of the might have few existing rights of way i.e. public watersides, woodland or particular views or The opportunities provided by rights of way for attractions exercise and other forms of open-air recreation Attractive routes to support tourism and and the enjoyment of the area economic regeneration or community lead The accessibility of rights of way to the blind initiatives. or partially sighted and those with mobility Opportunities for cycling, horse riding, horse problems. driving and walking, allowing people to avoid roads mainly used by motor vehicles. The plan should also contain statement of actions, Routes from centres of population in these are action local highway authorities proposes conjunction with public transport to allow easy to take for the management of local rights of way access to the countryside from where people and for securing improvements to the network, with live. particular regard to the matters dealt with in the Links to create circular routes and better assessment. facilities for walkers (including dog walkers), runners, cyclist, horse riders and drivers for Also the CRoW Act requires every local highway leisure and health. authority to consult with: Convenient and safe crossings over roads, railway, rivers and canals. Each local highway authority whose area The current rights of way network such as adjoins theirs ways ending in a cul-de-sac or routes carrying Each district and parish councils whose area is different rights along their lengths. within theirs Routes for local journeys such as walking to Any Local Access Forum established for their work, shops, doctors and other local area amenities The Countryside Agency (now Natural Routes through and around heavily developed England) areas, to ensure such development does not prevent or disrupt the continuity of the network. 6 The guidance gives greater depth to the process The study of the definitive map should allow a that the assessment should go through. Local high- preliminary assessment of: ways authorities should: The extent to which routes are available to Study of the definitive map and statements. different groups of users Collate and consider data on: Areas which are deficient in rights of way for all applications for modifications to the map or particular groups and statement Obvious inconsistencies or anomalies in request for improvement to the network relation to individual rights of way and Other opportunities to improve the network the current condition of the network Identify any other relevant information, The study of the map should be in conjunction with including plans and strategies. the wider highway network, cycle tracks and permissive routes including towpaths and routes through woodland and forest. BACKGROUND - Northamptonshire 7 Since the 1960s, the population of Northamptonshire has a significant natural heritage Northamptonshire has increased by 50% to with important areas in the western uplands and the 646,000 residents. It remains a predominantly Nene Valley. Its man-made heritage can be seen in rural county but is interspersed with several the limestone villages at either end and the large and small towns. sandstone villages in the Northampton area. Important contributions are also made by the small Northamptonshire is officially in the East Midlands industrial towns and the Grand Union Canal.
Recommended publications
  • 7 Background Paper
    Kettering Borough Rural Masterplanning Report August 2011 1 Contents Page No How to use this document 3 Public consultation 3 Part 1: Introduction, background & purpose of the project 4 1.1 Introduction 4 1.2 Background 4 1.3 Purpose of the project 5 1.4 Outcomes of the project 5 1.5 Methodology for assessing villages 6 1.5.1 Evaluation matrix 6 1.5.2 Assessment of place 7 1.5.3 Qualitative principles of place 7 Part 2: Borough-wide principles for rural development 9 Farm buildings 9 Materials 9 Parking 9 Highway standards 10 Part 3: Village-by-village analysis & development principles 11 Ashley 11 Braybrooke 27 Broughton 41 Cranford 57 Geddington 74 Grafton Underwood 91 Great Cransley 103 Harrington & Thorpe Underwood 116 Little Oakley 128 Loddington & Orton 138 Mawsley 151 Newton 163 Pytchley 173 Rushton 187 Stoke Albany, Brampton Ash & Dingley 200 Sutton Bassett 217 Thorpe Malsor 226 Warkton 238 Weekley 248 Weston by Welland 261 Wilbarston & Pipewell 274 How to use this document This document presents the findings of the Rural Masterplanning project conducted by Kettering Borough Council’s Planning Policy team as part of their Development Plan preparation for the rural area. The project involved a detailed analysis of the rural area and has provided a detailed assessment of all of the villages in the Borough. This will enable future development proposals to be considered in the context of each individual village’s characteristics and needs. The project also considers any opportunities for enhancement which may exist. This document is split into 3 parts: Part 1 sets out the background to the project, the planning context, the project’s purpose and outcomes and explains the methodology used to carry out the study.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology in Leicestershire and Rutland 1993
    Archaeology in Leicestershire and Rutland 1993 EXCAVATIONS: INTERIM REPORTS The medieval Trent bridges at Lynden Cooper and Susan Ripper Hemington Fields, Castle Donington (SK 459 302) Since the excavation of the Norman mill dam in 1985 by the Leicestershire Archaeological Unit, continued surveillance of the quarry has been undertaken by Dr. C.R. Salisbury (illus.l; see below p.179) . In August 1993 the Leicestershire Archaeological Unit was informed of two substantial timber and stone structures, the pier bases for a bridge. These were revealed during overburden stripping prior to gravel extraction. Subsequent excavation revealed two further pier bases for the bridge, provisionally dated to the mid 13th century. As excavations were being completed on this structure yet more massive timbers were uncovered at the quarry face, some 50m to the north-east. A second programme of excavation was therefore undertaken which revealed an even earlier bridge, of 11 th/12th century date. A third bridge structure was also found, located between the latter bridges, but had to be recorded under watching brief conditions. This structure has a provisional early 13th century date. After three months of excavation and two months of watching brief it is now possible to give some indication of the findings (illus. 2). The 11th/12th century bridge (illus. 2-5) The earliest bridge identified, incorporated the remains of two partially collapsed pier bases, a double row of posts (which may represent a second phase of bridge) and a collapsed trestle structure. The north-western extent of the bridge was quarried away during gravel extraction in 1991, although four upright posts were recorded which undoubtedly represent the continuation of the double row of posts (see below p.160).
    [Show full text]
  • ORM the SERPENT: a Tale of Viking Leicestershire Michael Wood
    ORM THE SERPENT: A taLE OF VIKING LEICESTERSHIRE Michael Wood It is a real pleasure, and a great honour, to be elected President of the Society – an undeserved honour given such distinguished predecessors. Local history is the root of history, and Leicester is the home of local history. Almost at the start of British writing on local history, following Lambarde in Kent, came Burton’s Description of Leicestershire (which went through Ned Blunt’s printing shop at the same time as the First Folio).1 Burton planned no less than three village histories – Lindley, Theddingworth and Dadlington – and his notebooks are a still untapped source of material, including his transcripts of lost Leicestershire Hundred Rolls in the Bodleian Library which would be a very valuable and exciting task for a local historian with Latin, following the model of the Kent Hundred Rolls Project. Later, as local studies burgeoned the London printer John Nichols compiled perhaps the greatest local history ever written, The History and Antiquities of the County of Leicester, which is still a gold mine for the local historian. That impetus continued throughout the nineteenth century when this society was founded in 1855. Then from the 1930s came a new golden age (a long one – for we are still in it!) when Frank Attenborough brought the Devonian Bill Hoskins here (there are photos of young David counting hedgerows around Oadby!). From then on the Transactions contain a roll call of the great historians who have shaped every generation of students since and opened local studies to a far wider public, nationally and internationally.
    [Show full text]
  • Dairy Farm, St Andrews Lane, Cranford Proposal Application for Listed Building Consent: Convert Farm Outbuildings Into 3 No
    BOROUGH OF KETTERING Committee Full Planning Committee - 27/03/2012 Item No: 5.8 Report Peter Chaplin Application No: Originator Development Manager KET/2011/0748 Wards Queen Eleanor and Buccleuch Affected Location Dairy Farm, St Andrews Lane, Cranford Proposal Application for Listed Building Consent: Convert farm outbuildings into 3 no. dwellings and 1 no. new dwelling Applicant Mr J Kilner GSS Architecture, 1. PURPOSE OF REPORT • To describe the above proposals • To identify and report on the issues arising from it • To state a recommendation on the application 2. RECOMMENDATION THE DEVELOPMENT CONTROL MANAGER RECOMMENDS that this application be APPROVED, subject to a S.106 OBLIGATION being entered into, and to the following conditions:- 1. The works hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of 3 years from the date of this listed building consent. REASON: To comply with Section 18 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) and to prevent an accumulation of unimplemented planning permissions. 2. No development shall commence on site until details of the types and colours of all external facing and roofing materials to be used including natural stone, slate, and clay tiles as indicates, [together with samples,] have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The development shall not be carried out other than in accordance with the approved details. REASON: In the interests of the visual amenities of the area in accordance with policy 27 of the East Midlands Regional Plan, policy of 13 of the North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy, and saved local Plan policy RA3.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Character Assessment Current
    CURRENT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT CONTENTS CONTENTS 02 PREFACE 04 1.0 INTRODUCTION 06 1.1 Appointment and Brief 06 1.2 Northamptonshire Environmental Characterisation Process 06 1.3 Landscape Characterisation in Practice 06 1.4 Northamptonshire Current Landsacape Character Assessment 07 1.5 Approach and Methodology 07 1.6 The Scope and Context of the Study 08 1.7 Parallel Projects and Surveys 08 1.8 Structure of the Report 09 2.0 EVOLUTION OF THE LANDSCAPE 10 2.1 Introduction 10 Physical Influences 2.2 Geology and Soils 10 2.3 Landform 14 2.4 Northamptonshire Physiographic Model 14 2.5 Hydrology 15 2.6 Land Use and Land Cover 16 2.7 Woodland and Trees 18 2.8 Biodiversity 19 2.85 Summary 22 2.9 Buildings and Settlement 23 2.10 Boundaries 25 2.11 Communications and Infrastructure 26 2.12 Historic Landscape Character 28 3.0 NORTHAMPTONSHIRE’S CURRENT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER 29 Cowpasture Spinney, Rolling Ironstone Valley Slopes 3.1 Introduction 29 3.2 Landscape Character Types and Landscape Character Areas 30 3.3 Landscape Character Type and Area Boundary Determination 30 CURRENT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT 2 CONTENTS 4.0 GLOSSARY 187 4.1 Key Landscape Character Assessment Terms 187 4.2 Other Technical Terms 187 4.3 Abbreviations 189 5.0 REFERENCES 190 6.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 191 APPENDICES View over arable land, Limestone Plateau Appendix 1 Data Sets Used in the Northamptonshire Current Landscape Character Assessment Appendix 2 Example of Digital Field Survey Forms Appendix 3 Field Work Prompts Sheets and Mapping Prompts Sheet Appendix
    [Show full text]
  • HARBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL OPEN SPACE/SPORT and RECREATIONAL FACILITIES and ASSESSMENT of LOCAL NEEDS FINAL REPORT by PMP In
    HARBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL OPEN SPACE/SPORT AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AND ASSESSMENT OF LOCAL NEEDS FINAL REPORT BY PMP in association with Donaldsons JUNE 2004 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive Summary What is the aim of this open space, sport and recreation study? The study aims to provide a clear picture of existing and future needs for open space, sport and recreation in Harborough and the current ability to meet those needs in terms of quality, quantity and accessibility. The study sets local standards based on assessments of local needs, demographics and audits of existing open spaces. It is the basis for addressing quantitative and qualitative deficiencies through the planning process and should form the basis of the development of an open space strategy for Harborough DC. Scope of the open space and sport and recreation study The study includes all open space and recreation types identified within the latest Planning Policy Guidance Note 17 (Planning for Open Space Sport and Recreation, July 2002) and its Companion Guide (September 2002). These include parks and gardens, natural and semi-natural areas, green corridors, amenity greenspace, provision for children and young people, outdoor sports facilities, allotments, cemeteries and churchyards and civic spaces. The study also considers the provision of sport and indoor recreation facilities. What is the need for the study of open space, sport and recreation? A local assessment of open space and open space needs will enable the Council to: • plan positively, creatively and effectively in identifying priority areas for improvement and to target appropriate types of open space required • ensure an adequate provision of high quality, accessible open space to meet the needs of community • ensure any accessible funding is invested in the right places where there is the most need • conduct S106 negations with developers from a position of knowledge with evidence to support.
    [Show full text]
  • Leicestershire County Council
    2015 Leicestershire County Council Consultation Statement Consultation Statement 1.0 Consultation Statement 1.1 As the first stage in the production of the Minerals and Waste Local Plan, the County Council published the following documents in November 2013: Leicestershire Minerals and Waste Local Plan: Issues Document; Leicestershire Minerals and Waste Local Plan Review - Sustainability Appraisal incorporating Strategic Environmental Assessment: Scoping Report. 1.2. The bodies with contact details listed in Appendix 1 were consulted by email or letter with a request for any comments to be provided by 24th January 2014. The documents, together with a summary leaflet and a response form, were made available on the County’s website (www.leics.gov.uk). The consultation exercise was also publicised by means of an advertisement placed in local newspapers. 1.3. A total of 70 groups and individuals responded to the Minerals and Waste Issues Consultation document. 28 of the responses were from councils (3 from District Councils; 12 from Parish Councils; 6 from adjoining Councils; and 7 from other councils), 12 from industry (7 from mineral companies and 5 from waste companies), 9 from statutory consultees, 2 from County Council Departments, 14 from other organisations, 2 from landowners and 3 from private individuals. A list of those who responded is set out in Table 1 below. 1 Consultation Statement Table 1: Respondents to the Issues consultation document Parish/Town Other Councils/ Industry Public Bodies Other Councils Meetings Blaby P.C. Charnwood Acorn Coal Authority British B.C. Recyclers Mountaineering Council Broughton Astley Hinckley & Air Products English Bowline P.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Harborough District Council Community
    www.southleicestershiremedicalgroup.co.uk Please note - These sites have not been verified by our practice but may be of use to you - Updated 15/4/20 Harborough District Council Community Hub Need Help with Shopping/collecting prescriptions/transport for hospital appointments/dog walking etc? Here you can register for help/support. HDC will link with you with a local volunteer who can help you. Or you can register your interest to become a volunteer. https://www.harborough.gov.uk/hd-community-hub Tel 01858 828282 (For a list of local community volunteer groups go to page 8) (For a list of local shops/businesses offering a delivery service go to page 11) Emergency Funding for MH Residents The Howard Watson Symington Memorial Charity are offering a grant of £100 to people struggling during the corona virus crisis. There is a pot of £5K available. Must be living in the Little Bowden or Great Bowden area. Apply online: https://www.hwsmcharity.org.uk/ Help for anyone that cannot find help locally You can register your information and a local government representative will organise a delivery on your behalf. Tel 0800 0288327 https://www.gov.uk/coronavirus-extremely-vulnerable For anyone with pets that needs to go into hospital due to Covid-19 RSPCA Support The RSPCA are offering to look after animals temporarily if members of the public are taken into hospital as a result of COVID 19. This is only if alternative arrangements cannot be found. Tel 07969 348969 1 www.southleicestershiremedicalgroup.co.uk Support for Older People VASL – Community Champions Can provide current information on where to find support.
    [Show full text]
  • Accompanying Note
    Rural Economy Planning Toolkit Companion Document Instructions for Using the Toolkit Useful Context Information Produced by: Funded by: Rural Economic Development Planning Toolkit This document explains how to use the toolkit in greater detail and sets out some of the broader context relevant to the development of the toolkit. Its sections are: Instructions for Using the Toolkit Economic Development Context The Emerging National Framework for Planning and Development The assessment of planning applications for rural economic development: designated sites and key issues for Leicestershire authorities What makes a good rural economic development planning proposal? Case Studies Parish Broadband Speeds The Distribution and Contribution of Rural Estates within Leicestershire Attractions in Leicester and Leicestershire Instructions - Using the Toolkit The toolkit is in the form of an interactive PDF document. Most of the text is locked, and you cannot change it. Throughout the toolkit, though, comments, information and responses are asked for, and boxes you can type in are provided. You are also asked to select 'traffic lights' – red, amber or green. It is important to understand that, if you start with a blank copy of the toolkit, the first thing you should do is save it with a different name using the 'Save as Copy' command in Acrobat Reader. This means you have now created a version of the toolkit for the particular project you are working on, and still have the blank copy of the toolkit for another time. Let's assume you have saved your copy of the PDF file as 'Project.pdf' – every time you save again you will save all of the additions and traffic light choices you have made.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Tree Health and Tree Populations in England Since C.1550
    The History of Tree Health and Tree Populations in England since c.1550. Tom Williamson Gerry Barnes Toby Pillatt Acknowledgements A large number of people have helped with this project, providing access to documents or providing information and advice. We would like to thank, in particular, the staff at Hertfordshire Archives and Local History, the Northamptonshire Record Office, Norfolk Record Office, and the various Yorkshire Record Offices (at Northallerton, Leeds, Bradford, Calderdale, Kirklees, Sheffield, Doncaster, Barnsley, Hull and Beverley); and Crispin Towell at Boughton House archives, Northamptonshire. Thanks also to Anne Rowe and Peter Austin, for information about Hertfordshire; Tracey Partida, for access to her research on Northamptonshire enclosure; and to Sid Cooper, Teresa Betterton, Rachel Riley, Richard Brooke, Jim Lyon, Andrew Falcon, Rod Pass, John White, Mark Pritchard, Rory Hart, Peter Clarke, Garry Battell, Nicola Orchard, Justin Gilbert, Andrew MacNair, Jack Langton, Rob Liddiard, Steve Scott and Patsy Dallas. Contents Part 1: Report Summary ……………………………………………………………………………… ........................ 4 Part 2: Main Report: ................................................................................................................ 18 1. Introduction: trees, woods and landscapes ….. .................................................................... 18 2. Farmland Trees ..................................................................................................................... 51 3. Woodland and Wood-Pasture
    [Show full text]
  • Prayer Diary
    PRAYER DIARY APRIL –JUNE 2021 Launde Abbey is a retreat house in the heart of the country with God at its centre April – June 2021 at Launde Abbey Retreats FOREWORD FROM For more information and to book Please note that due to ongoing restrictions, THE BISHOP OF LEICESTER please call or see our website these retreats may not go ahead or may require reduced numbers – please contact Launde In response to all adults in the UK pray, and even among Launde Abbey, East Norton Abbey for more information. Leicestershire, LE7 9XB the closure of those who say they are not religious, one LOOK AT THE BIRDS: A BIRDWATCHING RETREAT our churches in five admit that they still pray. Prayer is Led by Mark Winter 24th-27th May for public a common practice – involving far more worship, much than those who take part in regular sport, LAUNDE CYCLING RETREAT of the critical are members of political parties, or even Led by Dr Alastair Jones 7th-9th June response has those who go to church. been to stress BELOVED OF GOD: PRAYING WITH the benefits Millions of people in our own nation and JULIAN OF NORWICH of prayer across the world believe that prayer not Led by Chris Webb 21st-24th June for mental only makes us feel better but can also health, for make a difference. Christians pray not SUNRISE OF WONDER: A CONTEMPLATIVE peace of mind only because it brings peace of mind, but PRAYER INTENSIVE Led by Martin Laird 27th-30th June and wellbeing, for inspiration for because we believe that, in ways beyond volunteering, and perhaps even to our capacity to understand or predict, ICON PAINTING RETREAT change things for the better.
    [Show full text]
  • The Local Government Boundary Commission for England Electoral Review of Harborough
    SHEET 1, MAP 1 THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND ELECTORAL REVIEW OF HARBOROUGH Final recommendations for ward boundaries in the district of Harborough July 2017 Sheet 1 of 1 OWSTON AND LOWESBY NEWBOLD CP MAREFIELD CP CP This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. The Local Government Boundary Commission for England GD100049926 2017. HUNGARTON Boundary alignment and names shown on the mapping background CP may not be up to date. They may differ from the latest boundary information COLD applied as part of this review. KEYHAM NEWTON CP CP SCRAPTOFT CP The parish boundaries of Hungarton and Houghton on the Hill, as shown on this map, are not operative until 1st April 2019. THURNBY & TILTON ON WITHCOTE THE HILL AND CP HOUGHTON HALSTEAD CP BILLESDON & TILTON LAUNDE CP THURNBY AND BUSHBY CP BILLESDON HOUGHTON ON CP KEY TO PARISH WARDS THE HILL CP BROUGHTON ASTLEY CP SKEFFINGTON CP A ASTLEY LODDINGTON B BROUGHTON NORTH CP C BROUGHTON SOUTH STOUGHTON D PRIMETHORPE CP E SUTTON FRISBY CP LUTTERWORTH CP GAULBY F BROOKFIELD CP ROLLESTON G ORCHARD LITTLE CP STRETTON CP KING'S H SPRINGS TUGBY AND NORTON CP EAST KEYTHORPE CP I SWIFT NORTON CP ALLEXTON CP ILLSTON ON THE HILL CP GLEN GOADBY NOSELEY CP CP GREAT GLEN CP HORNINGHOLD CP BURTON OVERY CP HALLATON CP STOCKERSTON CP SHANGTON CP CARLTON CURLIEU CP WISTOW
    [Show full text]