7 Background Paper

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

7 Background Paper Kettering Borough Rural Masterplanning Report August 2011 1 Contents Page No How to use this document 3 Public consultation 3 Part 1: Introduction, background & purpose of the project 4 1.1 Introduction 4 1.2 Background 4 1.3 Purpose of the project 5 1.4 Outcomes of the project 5 1.5 Methodology for assessing villages 6 1.5.1 Evaluation matrix 6 1.5.2 Assessment of place 7 1.5.3 Qualitative principles of place 7 Part 2: Borough-wide principles for rural development 9 Farm buildings 9 Materials 9 Parking 9 Highway standards 10 Part 3: Village-by-village analysis & development principles 11 Ashley 11 Braybrooke 27 Broughton 41 Cranford 57 Geddington 74 Grafton Underwood 91 Great Cransley 103 Harrington & Thorpe Underwood 116 Little Oakley 128 Loddington & Orton 138 Mawsley 151 Newton 163 Pytchley 173 Rushton 187 Stoke Albany, Brampton Ash & Dingley 200 Sutton Bassett 217 Thorpe Malsor 226 Warkton 238 Weekley 248 Weston by Welland 261 Wilbarston & Pipewell 274 How to use this document This document presents the findings of the Rural Masterplanning project conducted by Kettering Borough Council’s Planning Policy team as part of their Development Plan preparation for the rural area. The project involved a detailed analysis of the rural area and has provided a detailed assessment of all of the villages in the Borough. This will enable future development proposals to be considered in the context of each individual village’s characteristics and needs. The project also considers any opportunities for enhancement which may exist. This document is split into 3 parts: Part 1 sets out the background to the project, the planning context, the project’s purpose and outcomes and explains the methodology used to carry out the study. Part 2 sets out some general principles to guide future development in rural areas which were identified as common themes from the analysis undertaken. They cover redevelopment of farm buildings, materials, parking and highway standards. Part 3 has a section for each village in the Borough and contains the bulk of the information contained in this document. For each village there is a detailed analysis, identification of any issues and opportunities and some draft design principles to guide any future development. Readers interested in a specific village can turn directly to that village’s individual section for the information presented for that place. Public Consultation The outputs of the Rural Masterplanning project presented in this report will be taken forward into the Site Specific Proposals LDD and subject to extensive public consultation. The next stage of the Site Specific Proposals LDD will be an Options Paper – setting out options for public consultation. This will include setting out draft Borough wide design principles for rural development, accompanied by a detailed section for each village, in which the draft design principles for that settlement, and any identified opportunities or potential development sites are proposed. At this stage communities will be consulted and have the chance to provide feedback on the Rural Masterplanning work and the options drafted for each settlement. This report is a background paper. Any principles and opportunities taken forward from this document into the Site Specific Proposals LDD Options Paper will be dependent on the outcomes of public consultation on that document. No development site allocations are made within this Rural Masterplanning report. The purpose of this Rural Masterplanning project is to assess the character of each village and any opportunities, for protection, development or enhancement that may exist as well as to look at any submitted housing sites in their context. Options regarding the level of development and which, if any, sites could be developed, will be contained in the next stage of the Site Specific Proposals LDD, which will be informed by this and other background papers. The Site Specific Proposals LDD will be subject to extensive public consultation, scheduled for late 2011 / early 2012. 3 Part 1: Introduction, background & purpose of the project Kettering Borough, whilst comprising several towns, is a predominantly rural area benefitting from many attractive villages set in attractive countryside. A key element of Plan making for the Borough is to arrive at a policy framework which manages rural needs and development whilst maintaining the special character of our rural areas, and where possible adding to the sustainability, quality, vitality and vibrancy of village life. Planning policy for the rural area of the Borough, including its villages, is currently covered by the North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy (CSS) and the saved policies of the Local Plan. The Local Plan dates back to 1995 and is being replaced by a Local Development Framework (LDF), of which the CSS is part. However, the CSS is a strategic level document for the sub-region and detail on rural matters is light. More detailed policy for Kettering Borough’s rural areas is to be provided in the emerging Site Specific Proposals Local Development Document (LDD). Issues consultation on the Site Specific Proposals LDD was carried out in March 2009 with Options consultation planned for the next stage of the plan in late 2011 / early 2012. The need to inform this LDD with an up-to-date evidence base, combined with the age of the saved Local Plan policies meant that work was needed to address the current rural context of the Borough and to determine the planning issues therein. In the past, new development in villages has often failed to take account of the context in which it is being built. Standardised designs and building materials alongside urban style road layouts have lead to the introduction of urban style developments in the rural area. These developments detract from the qualities that make villages in the Borough special. Recent rural development, particularly affordable housing development, has often not adequately reflected local character, materials and identity. There is a danger that the special character of the Borough’s rural areas may be eroded with unsympathetic development which meets quantitative housing targets but fails to deliver quality developments responsive to local need and identity. This has lead to reluctance from people living in those villages affected to see any further development. However, new development in villages can have a positive impact on villages in terms of supporting services and facilities, providing housing to allow local people to remain in the village and to provide some small scale employment or community facilities. New development does not have to mean development which detracts from the character of the village. Provided development is designed to a high standard, and positively contributes and enhances the character of the area, then development can have a positive impact. There is an argument that some change or development is necessary in some villages, in order to sustain them in the future and allow them to continue to flourish as mixed communities. For example can enable new generations of people to live in rural areas; provide affordable homes for local people; allow young families to continue to live in villages and support facilities such as schools and pubs. Villages have evolved over time and it is important when thinking about future development to think about the needs of existing residents and how to best meet these needs while maintaining the need to ensure development is focused in sustainable locations. A need for a project was therefore identified to address these issues with the overriding objective of informing the Site Specific Proposals LDD. 1.2 Background Kettering Borough Council received backing from the Government’s (DEFRA’s) Rural Masterplanning Fund having demonstrated a compelling vision for rural areas. Alan Baxter & Associates were appointed by CABE (Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment) under the enabling framework to draw together a methodology for assessing rural settlements. 4 Alan Baxters role was to provide expert advice and guide the creation of a draft methodology to assist rural settlement analysis. 5 case studies settlements were initially assessed (Broughton, Geddington, Grafton Underwood, Stoke Albany, and Wilbarston). This enabled the methodology and intended outcomes of the project to be refined and finalised. Officers from Kettering Borough Council then applied the methodology in a detailed analysis of each settlement in district, and used this to consider future opportunities for development or enhancements in the villages, and to develop design based principles to guide future development proposals. 1.3 Purpose of the Rural Masterplanning project The purpose of this Rural Masterplanning project is to take a holistic look at each of the Borough’s villages needs, aspirations, opportunities for improvement, potential capacity for future development and, crucially, to ensure that any new development in villages respects and enhances the qualities of that village which make it special. The project explores and draws out relevant issues to inform a clearer spatial understanding of rural areas and the roles, functions, relationships, needs, aspirations, qualities of the built and natural environment, and special character of settlements in order to develop a strategy for ensuring their sustainable future. A key focus of the work has been identifying qualities of the built and natural environment and capturing the sense of place to ensure locally
Recommended publications
  • ROW Improvement Plan Book
    RIGHTS OF WAY Improvement Plan 2007-2011 Photograph © RNRP Foreword 2 Introduction 3 CONTENTS Background 4 Rights of Way Improvement Plans 5 Northamptonshire 7 Other Strategies and Plans 8 Local Transport Plan 2006/07 – 2010/11 11 Safer Cleaner Greener and Local Delivery 13 Assessment of the Current Network - The Access Network 14 Assessment of the Current Network - Network Assessment 18 Assessment of People’s Needs and Demands 31 Key Issues 32 Highlights of the Needs and Demands Survey 33 The Action Plan 35 Appendix A – Assessment of Potential Short Circular Walks 62 Appendix B – Potential Inter-Village Routes 68 FOREWORD 2 Welcome to the which there are proposals to deliver significant Northamptonshire Rights urban expansion around the major towns which will of Way Improvement include a great deal of associated infrastructure Plan. such as new roads, education facilities and leisure opportunities. Our Rights of Way team is fully We have a tremendous committed to achieve as much as possible in asset in the network of partnership with the growth area delivery bodies public rights of way here and as you will read, great importance has been in Northamptonshire, placed on this subject within this plan’s Statement and I am delighted to of Action. introduce our plan for the coming years that I would like to personally thank everyone who sets out how we will contributed to the production of this plan, especially prioritise our actions to bring about improvements all those who took part in the initial surveys in 2004 for all members of the community. and everyone who completed feedback on the Draft Plan launched at the 2005 Northampton I know how important this network is to everyone Balloon Festival.
    [Show full text]
  • 'United Benefice' of Cranford, Grafton Underwood, Slipton & Twywell
    The ‘United Benefice’ of Cranford, Grafton Underwood, Slipton & Twywell, Northamptonshire 2020 Profile & Vision Statement 1 Contents Preamble ………………………………………………………………. 3 Introduction ………………………………………………………… 4 Our Mission and Vision …………………………………………… 5 The United Benefice and Surrounding Area ………………………. 8 The Rectory …………………………………………………………. 9 Profile of Cranford ………………………………………………….. 10 Profile of Grafton Underwood …………………………………….. 13 Profile of Slipton …………………………………………………... 17 Profile of Twywell …………………………………………………… 20 Our Current Services …………………………………………………… 24 Media …………………………………………………………………. 25 Clerical Support Overview …………………………………………….. 26 Additional Support ……………………….…………………………… 27 Our Finances …………………………………………………………… 28 A vacancy for you? ……………………………………………………. 29 Taking the Next Step ……………………………………………………. 30 Application Details ……………………………………………………. 30 2 Preamble This document has been created to assist in our recruitment of a new minister. It is intended to provide you with a brief overview of our location, day-to-day life within our small group of rural parishes and how we currently go about delivering the Gospel, along with our future aspirations. It is by no means exhaustive, but will, hopefully, contain enough information to inspire you to want to learn more. At the end of this document you will find contact details for both further enquiry and how to apply. Thank you for your interest. 3 Introduction The Benefice of Cranford, Grafton Underwood and Twywell in Northamptonshire was served by the Rector, the Revd Daniel Foot, for 35 years until his retirement at the end of September 2018. Slipton was informally added to this group in 1995. This document has been prepared to acquaint a potential successor with information concerning the four parish group. Although, since the inclusion of Slipton, now not wholly a formal Benefice, we regard ourselves as one. In general terms and for the purposes of this Profile and Vision Statement we refer to ourselves as a ‘ United Benefice ’.
    [Show full text]
  • Premises, Sites Etc Within 30 Miles of Harrington Museum Used for Military Purposes in the 20Th Century
    Premises, Sites etc within 30 miles of Harrington Museum used for Military Purposes in the 20th Century The following listing attempts to identify those premises and sites that were used for military purposes during the 20th Century. The listing is very much a works in progress document so if you are aware of any other sites or premises within 30 miles of Harrington, Northamptonshire, then we would very much appreciate receiving details of them. Similarly if you spot any errors, or have further information on those premises/sites that are listed then we would be pleased to hear from you. Please use the reporting sheets at the end of this document and send or email to the Carpetbagger Aviation Museum, Sunnyvale Farm, Harrington, Northampton, NN6 9PF, [email protected] We hope that you find this document of interest. Village/ Town Name of Location / Address Distance to Period used Use Premises Museum Abthorpe SP 646 464 34.8 km World War 2 ANTI AIRCRAFT SEARCHLIGHT BATTERY Northamptonshire The site of a World War II searchlight battery. The site is known to have had a generator and Nissen huts. It was probably constructed between 1939 and 1945 but the site had been destroyed by the time of the Defence of Britain survey. Ailsworth Manor House Cambridgeshire World War 2 HOME GUARD STORE A Company of the 2nd (Peterborough) Battalion Northamptonshire Home Guard used two rooms and a cellar for a company store at the Manor House at Ailsworth Alconbury RAF Alconbury TL 211 767 44.3 km 1938 - 1995 AIRFIELD Huntingdonshire It was previously named 'RAF Abbots Ripton' from 1938 to 9 September 1942 while under RAF Bomber Command control.
    [Show full text]
  • Grafton Underwood Solar Farm Northamptonshire
    Grafton Underwood Solar Farm Northamptonshire Archaeological Evaluation for Pegasus Group on behalf of Elgin Energy Site Code – GRU 20 Event Number - ENN109787 CA Project: MK0184 CA Report: MK0184_1 February 2020 GRAFTON UNDERWOOD SOLAR FARM NORTHAMPTONSHIRE Archaeological Evaluation CA Project: MK0184 CA Report: MK0184_1 Document Control Grid Revision Date Author Checked by Status Reasons for Approved revision by A 13/02/2020 DP AW Internal Quality Assurance SRJ review B 14/02/2020 DP/AW CM External Consultant SRJ review comment This report is confidential to the client. Cotswold Archaeology accepts no responsibility or liability to any third party to whom this report, or any part of it, is made known. Any such party relies upon this report entirely at their own risk. No part of this report may be reproduced by any means without permission. © Cotswold Archaeology © Cotswold Archaeology Grafton Underwood Solar Farm, Northamptonshire: Archaeological Evaluation CONTENTS SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 2 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 3 2. ARCHAEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND ................................................................ 4 3. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES ................................................................................... 6 4. METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................... 6 5. RESULTS (FIGS
    [Show full text]
  • 5.10 Ket.2019.0225
    BOROUGH OF KETTERING Committee Full Planning Committee - 04/06/2019 Item No: 5.10 Report Louisa Johnson Application No: Originator Development Officer KET/2019/0225 Wards Queen Eleanor and Buccleuch Affected Location 27 Cranford Road, Grafton Underwood Proposal Full Application: Part two storey part single storey side extension Applicant Mr M Hillery 1. PURPOSE OF REPORT To describe the above proposals To identify and report on the issues arising from it To state a recommendation on the application 2. RECOMMENDATION THE DEVELOPMENT CONTROL MANAGER RECOMMENDS that this application be APPROVED subject to the following Condition(s):- 1. The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of 3 years from the date of this planning permission. REASON: To comply with Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) and to prevent an accumulation of unimplemented planning permissions. 2. The development hereby permitted shall not be carried out other than in accordance with the approved plans and details listed below. REASON: In the interest of securing an appropriate form of development in accordance with Policy 8 of the North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy. 3. No development above building slab level shall commence on site until details of the types and colours of all external facing, roofing materials and joinery / window details to be used, together with samples, have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The development shall be constructed of natural stone only. The development shall not be carried out other than in accordance with the approved details. REASON: Details of materials are necessary in the interests of the visual amenities of the Conservation Area in accordance with Policies 2 and 8 of the North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultee List
    Consultee List • A43 Action Group • BBD • Abbey Developments Ltd • BDP • Acorn Homes • Beanfield Junior School • Adams Holmes Associates • Beanfield Tenants & Residents Association • Afro Caribbean Association • Bedford Borough Council • Age Concern Northampton & County • Bedford Group Of Drainage Boards • Age Concern Wellingborough • Bedford PCT • Aldwincle Parish Council • Bedfordshire County Council • Alfred Street Junior School • Bee Bee Developments Ltd • Alfred Underwood Limited • Bell Cornwell Partnership • Al-Jamaat Ul-Muslimin Of Bangladesh • Bellway Homes • All Saints CE Primary School • Bellway Homes Ltd • All Saints Church Mears Ashby • Benefield Parish Council • All Saints Gt Harrowden & St Marys Lt Harrowden and • Berkeley Community Villages St Mary’s Orlingbury • Berry Morris • Amec E&E (UK) Ltd • Berry's • Ancer SPA • Bidwells • Andrew Granger & Co LLP • Bidwells Property Consultants • Anglian Water Services Limited • Biffa Waste Services Ltd • Apethorpe Parish Meeting • Billing Parish Council • Appletree Homes Ltd • Bishop Stopford School • Aragon Land And Planning Uk Ltd • Blackthorn Residents Association • Arc Recycled Materials • Blatherwycke Parish Meeting • Archaelogical And Historical Society • Blenheim Property Associates • Architectural And Surveying Services Ltd • Blenheim Realty • Architectural And Surveying Services Ltd • Bletsoes • Arriva UK Ltd • Bloomfields Ltd • Arthingworth Parish Council • Bloor Homes • Arts Council England East Midlands • Boothville Community Council • Ashley Parish Council • Borough
    [Show full text]
  • North Northamptonshire (Proposed Unitary)
    Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index (IDACI) 2019 Profile North Northamptonshire (Proposed Unitary) Profile of statistics from the 2019 release of the English Indices of Deprivation. Data Source : Ministry for Housing, Communities & Local Government Profile Creation & Other Analysis : Business Intelligence, Northamptonshire County Council Icons made by https://www.freepik.com from https://www.flaticon.com. Flaticon is licensed by Creative Commons http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 Contents 1. IDACI 2019 : Useful Background Information 2. IDACI 2019 : Spread of Deprivation by National Decile 3. Timeseries Distribution of Deprivation by National Rank 4. DACI 2019 v. IDACI 2015 : Shift of Deprivation by National Decile 5. IDACI 2019 : Top 20 Most Deprived LSOAs by National Rank 6. IDACI 2019 : MHCLG Local Authority Summary Measures 7. IMD 2019 : Deprivation Affected Populations 8. Further Information 1. IDACI 2019 : Useful Background Information The Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index (IDACI) is one of the three English Indices of Deprivation. It is formatted using small geographical areas called Lower Super Output Areas (LSOAs), of which there are 32,844 across the country, with 194 of them falling within North Northamptonshire. At the time of the 2011 Census each LSOA represented around 1,600 people. Along with the main Index of Multiple Deprivation, the IDACI is released on an adhoc timescale by the Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government (MHCLG). The 2019 release, analysed here, replaces the 2015 version and was constructed primarily by Oxford Consultants for Social Inclusion (OCSI) on behalf of the MHCLG. Profiles for the proposed unitary authority of North Northamptonshire are also available for the other two indices which are part of the English Indices of Deprivation (see links in section 8) : The Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) The Income Deprivation Affecting Older People Index (IDAOPI) This profile, however, concentrates on the IDACI.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphical Framework for the Middle Jurassic Strata of Great
    Stratigraphical framework for the Middle Jurassic strata of Great Britain and the adjoining continental shelf Geology and Landscape Programme Research Report RR/11/06 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY RESEARCH REPORT RR/11/06 The National Grid and other Stratigraphical framework for the Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database rights 2012. Ordnance Survey Licence Middle Jurassic strata of Great No. 100021290 Britain and the adjoining Key words Geology, stratigraphy, lithostratigraphy, Inferior Oolite continental shelf Group, Great Oolite Group, Ravenscar Group, Great Estuarine Group, Sutherland Group, Ancholme Group, Jurassic. A J M Barron, G K Lott, J B Riding Front cover Hilltop Quarry, Leckhampton Hill, Cheltenham, Glos.: the Birdlip Limestone Formation overlain by the Aston Limestone Formation. (P775213, A J M Barron) Bibliographical reference BARRON, A J M, LOTT, G K, AND RIDING, J B. 2012. Stratigraphical framework for the Middle Jurassic strata of Great Britain and the adjoining continental shelf. British Geological Survey Research Report, RR/11/06. 187pp. ISBN 978 0 85272 695 2 Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and/or the authority that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, e-mail [email protected]. You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided
    [Show full text]
  • English Hundred-Names
    l LUNDS UNIVERSITETS ARSSKRIFT. N. F. Avd. 1. Bd 30. Nr 1. ,~ ,j .11 . i ~ .l i THE jl; ENGLISH HUNDRED-NAMES BY oL 0 f S. AND ER SON , LUND PHINTED BY HAKAN DHLSSON I 934 The English Hundred-Names xvn It does not fall within the scope of the present study to enter on the details of the theories advanced; there are points that are still controversial, and some aspects of the question may repay further study. It is hoped that the etymological investigation of the hundred-names undertaken in the following pages will, Introduction. when completed, furnish a starting-point for the discussion of some of the problems connected with the origin of the hundred. 1. Scope and Aim. Terminology Discussed. The following chapters will be devoted to the discussion of some The local divisions known as hundreds though now practi­ aspects of the system as actually in existence, which have some cally obsolete played an important part in judicial administration bearing on the questions discussed in the etymological part, and in the Middle Ages. The hundredal system as a wbole is first to some general remarks on hundred-names and the like as shown in detail in Domesday - with the exception of some embodied in the material now collected. counties and smaller areas -- but is known to have existed about THE HUNDRED. a hundred and fifty years earlier. The hundred is mentioned in the laws of Edmund (940-6),' but no earlier evidence for its The hundred, it is generally admitted, is in theory at least a existence has been found.
    [Show full text]
  • Dairy Farm, St Andrews Lane, Cranford Proposal Application for Listed Building Consent: Convert Farm Outbuildings Into 3 No
    BOROUGH OF KETTERING Committee Full Planning Committee - 27/03/2012 Item No: 5.8 Report Peter Chaplin Application No: Originator Development Manager KET/2011/0748 Wards Queen Eleanor and Buccleuch Affected Location Dairy Farm, St Andrews Lane, Cranford Proposal Application for Listed Building Consent: Convert farm outbuildings into 3 no. dwellings and 1 no. new dwelling Applicant Mr J Kilner GSS Architecture, 1. PURPOSE OF REPORT • To describe the above proposals • To identify and report on the issues arising from it • To state a recommendation on the application 2. RECOMMENDATION THE DEVELOPMENT CONTROL MANAGER RECOMMENDS that this application be APPROVED, subject to a S.106 OBLIGATION being entered into, and to the following conditions:- 1. The works hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of 3 years from the date of this listed building consent. REASON: To comply with Section 18 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) and to prevent an accumulation of unimplemented planning permissions. 2. No development shall commence on site until details of the types and colours of all external facing and roofing materials to be used including natural stone, slate, and clay tiles as indicates, [together with samples,] have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The development shall not be carried out other than in accordance with the approved details. REASON: In the interests of the visual amenities of the area in accordance with policy 27 of the East Midlands Regional Plan, policy of 13 of the North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy, and saved local Plan policy RA3.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Character Assessment Current
    CURRENT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT CONTENTS CONTENTS 02 PREFACE 04 1.0 INTRODUCTION 06 1.1 Appointment and Brief 06 1.2 Northamptonshire Environmental Characterisation Process 06 1.3 Landscape Characterisation in Practice 06 1.4 Northamptonshire Current Landsacape Character Assessment 07 1.5 Approach and Methodology 07 1.6 The Scope and Context of the Study 08 1.7 Parallel Projects and Surveys 08 1.8 Structure of the Report 09 2.0 EVOLUTION OF THE LANDSCAPE 10 2.1 Introduction 10 Physical Influences 2.2 Geology and Soils 10 2.3 Landform 14 2.4 Northamptonshire Physiographic Model 14 2.5 Hydrology 15 2.6 Land Use and Land Cover 16 2.7 Woodland and Trees 18 2.8 Biodiversity 19 2.85 Summary 22 2.9 Buildings and Settlement 23 2.10 Boundaries 25 2.11 Communications and Infrastructure 26 2.12 Historic Landscape Character 28 3.0 NORTHAMPTONSHIRE’S CURRENT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER 29 Cowpasture Spinney, Rolling Ironstone Valley Slopes 3.1 Introduction 29 3.2 Landscape Character Types and Landscape Character Areas 30 3.3 Landscape Character Type and Area Boundary Determination 30 CURRENT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT 2 CONTENTS 4.0 GLOSSARY 187 4.1 Key Landscape Character Assessment Terms 187 4.2 Other Technical Terms 187 4.3 Abbreviations 189 5.0 REFERENCES 190 6.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 191 APPENDICES View over arable land, Limestone Plateau Appendix 1 Data Sets Used in the Northamptonshire Current Landscape Character Assessment Appendix 2 Example of Digital Field Survey Forms Appendix 3 Field Work Prompts Sheets and Mapping Prompts Sheet Appendix
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Committee
    Planning Committee Wednesday 11 March 2015 at 7pm Council Chamber, Swanspool House, Doddington Road, Wellingborough, Northamptonshire, NN8 1BP 1. Apologies for absence. 2. Declarations of interest (completed forms to be handed to the committee clerk). 3. Confirmation of the minutes of the meeting held on 11 February 2015. 4. Applications for planning permission, listed building consent, building regulation approval and appeal information.* 5. Planning Appeal Decision: (a) Minton Distribution Centre, Wellingborough Road, Sywell. 6. Any other items that the Chairman decides are urgent. * The reports on this agenda include summaries of representations that have been received in response to consultation under the Planning Acts and in accordance with the provisions in the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) Order 2010. Full transcripts and copies of the disclosable representations can be obtained from the Council’s website: http://www.wellingborough.gov.uk/viewplanningapplications and are also obtainable from the planning case files, which are available for inspection on request by ringing 01933 231568 Site viewing group for 10 March 2015 will be Councillors Ward, Griffiths, Timms and Scarborough. John T Campbell Chief Executive Date issued: 3 March 2015. Enclosed. Swanspool House, Doddington Road, Wellingborough, Northamptonshire NN8 1BP Tel: 01933 229777 Fax: 01933 231684 www.wellingborough.gov.uk For further information about this agenda, please contact Fiona Hubbard on 01933 231519 or [email protected]. If you wish to address the committee on an agenda item you can register by: completing the form on the council’s website at www.wellingborough.gov.uk/speakersform; or completing the appropriate form which is available at reception desks; or contacting Fiona Hubbard as detailed above.
    [Show full text]