Heroes of the Bronze Age

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Heroes of the Bronze Age ARCH 0412 From Gilgamesh to Hektor: Heroes of the Bronze Age February 19, 2016: Hittite Myths in Later Traditions Epics and Gods in Anatolia: Recap • Main ‘hero’: Storm-God (Teshub) • Different avatars of the Storm God served the purpose of heroes in Anatolia (to benefit the living, as the eponymous Greek heroes did for different city-states) • Repeating themes in Hittite epic: battle of chaos and order, regeneration of nature, fertility, forces of natures treated as deities The Hittite Empire and Its Aftermath The Hittite Empire and Its Aftermath Hittite Empire and Its Aftermath Syro-Hittite and Aramaic city-states Colonies, Trade and Geographies of Interaction Depiction of the Storm Depiction of Zeus as God Teshub from Storm God, Hatay Zincirli, 10th-7th century 3rd-1st century BCE BCE Means and Modes of Contact and Transmission • Wandering poet • International festival • Involuntary movement of cult personnel Hattusa and Yerkapi The amphitheater at Delphi A Greek Panhellenic sanctuary for large festivals Cosmogony: Any model explaining the origins of the universe (cosmos) Babylonian Cosmogony Hittite Cosmogony Greek Cosmogony (Enûma Eliš) (The Song of Kumarbi) (Theogony) At first, the waters of primeval Apsu and First there was Chaos Tiamat were mingled together. Through the union of Apsu and Tiamat, the In primeval years, Alalu was king in From Chaos, Gaia (Earth), Tartarus (depths gods were called into being, one by one. heaven. of the earth) and Eros (love). From them, And they reside in Tiamat’s body. the first generation of gods were created. These new gods were loud and restless. In the ninth year, Anu fought against Alalu Uranus (Sky) mated with Gaia (Earth) and Apsu was disturbed by them and decided and became the king of heaven. created twelve Titans. He was disgusted to kill them. with them and hid them in the earth. Tiamat warned Ea, the most powerful of In the ninth year of Anu’s kingship, Anu Gaia is angered by Uranus’s actions, and the gods, of Apsu’s intentions to protect her decides to wage war on his son Kumarbi. asks her children to punish their father. children. One of the children, Chronos, agrees. Ea kills Apsu and becomes the chief god. Kumarbi defeats Anu and bites Anu’s Chronos castrates Uranus and becomes the ‘manhood’. chief god. Ea’s son Marduk is even stronger than him. Anu’s manhood impregnates Kumarbi with Chronos marries Rhea, one of his sisters. To stop Ea and Marduk becoming too the Storm God. Kumarbi wants to swallow Since there is a prophecy that one of his strong, the other gods fetch a plan and Teshub (The Storm God) upon his birth to children will overthrow him, he starts convince Tiamat to avenge Apsu’s death. eliminate the threat swallowing his children. Ea gives Kumarbi a piece of basalt to Rhea gives Chronos a stone to swallow swallow instead of Teshub. instead of Zeus, and sends Zeus away. Marduk defeats Tiamat and the 11 Teshub defeats Kumarbi in battle and After he is strong enough, Zeus fights monsters she created, and becomes the became the chief god. against Chronos and the Titans, overthrows chief god. him and becomes the chief god. Team Trivia!! • Divide into groups of 3, and find a name for your group • There will be 10 questions, some multiple- choice, some you will need to write the answer in. • Answer the questions on the papers provided, and remember to write your group name on it. Question 1 What is the name of the district in Uruk that yielded many famous artifacts such as the Uruk (Warka) Vase? a) The White Temple b) The Ziggurat of Anu c) The Eanna Precinct d) The Ziggurat of Ur-Nammu Answer: Eanna Precinct Composite plan of the Eanna district (note, for instance, The mosaic court (top left), the mask of a woman that the Ur-Nammu ziggurat dates to 2100-2000 BCE) dating to c. 3200-3000 BCE (top right), the Uruk (Warka) vase dating to c. 3000 BCE (bottom) Question 2 Which option lists the correct name and date of this object? a) Sumerian King List – c. 3000 BCE b) Standard of Ur – c. 3000 BCE c) Sumerian King List – c. 2600 BCE d) Standard of Ur – c. 2600 BCE Answer: Standard of Ur, c. 2600 BCE The Sumerian King List (The Weld- The Standard of Ur, from the Royal Tombs of Ur Blundell Prism) c. 2600 BCE c. 2000-1800 BCE (Old Babylonian) Obverse side “Peace”, top; Reverse side “War”, bottom Ashmolean Museum, Ashm 1923-444 Question 3 Which of the following is NOT a monster/animal that Gilgamesh faces? a) Illuyanka b) Humbaba c) Bull of Heaven d) Stone Ones Question 4 Name three themes we discussed in relation with the Gilgamesh Epic. Question 5: Double Dare! What is the name of the Babylonian Creation Myth? (you lose all your points if you answer wrong, and double them if you answer right.) Question 6 Which of the following is the site of the royal burials from Early Bronze Age Anatolia? a) Alaca Höyük b) Hattusa c) Kültepe/Karum Kanes d) Demirci Höyük Answer: Alaca Höyük, the site of Early Bronze Age Royal Burials Question 7 Which one of the following Hittite myths does relate to the creation of the world? a) The Song of Release b) Appu and his Two Sons c) The Disappearance of the Storm God d) The Song of Kumarbi Question 8 Which one of the following is NOT a shared theme in the cosmogonies of Mesopotamia, Anatolia and Greece? a) The conception of Chaos as a monster b) The conflict between primordial gods and their offspring c) The supremacy of a younger generation of gods over the Primordial ones d) The protection younger gods receive from an elder, female goddess figure Question 9 Which one of the following was NOT a way by which Hittite myths were recorded and preserved in oral and collective memory? a) Travelling poets b) Copying of cuneiform tablets by Greeks c) Large festivals d) Movement of cult personnel Question 10: Double Dare! Name the two essential geographies for transmission of Hittite myths (you lose all your points if you answer wrong, and double them if you answer right.) .
Recommended publications
  • General Introduction Hesiod and His Poems
    General Introduction Hesiod and His Poems The Theogony is one of the most important mythical texts to survive from antiquity, and I devote the first section of this translation to it. It tells of the creation of the present world order under the rule of almighty Zeus. The Works and Days, in the second section, describes a bitter dispute between Hesiod and his brother over the disposition of their father’s property, a theme that allows Hesiod to range widely over issues of right and wrong. The Shield of Herakles, whose centerpiece is a long description of a work of art, is not by Hesiod, at least most of it, but it was always attributed to him in antiquity. It is Hesiodic in style and has always formed part of the Hesiodic corpus. It makes up the third section of this book. The influence of Homer’s poems on Greek and later culture is inestima- ble, but Homer never tells us who he is; he stands behind his poems, invisi- ble, all-knowing. His probable contemporary Hesiod, by contrast, is the first self-conscious author in Western literature. Hesiod tells us something about himself in his poetry. His name seems to mean “he who takes pleasure in a journey” (for what it is worth) but in the Works and Days he may play with the meaning of “he who sends forth song.” As with all names—for example, Homer, meaning “hostage,” or Herodotus, meaning “a warrior’s gift”—the name of a poet may have nothing to do with his actual career.
    [Show full text]
  • Shaushka, the Traveling Goddess Graciela GESTOSO SINGER
    Shaushka, the Traveling Goddess Graciela GESTOSO SINGER Traveling gods and goddesses between courts was a well-known motif in the ancient Near East. Statues of gods and goddesses served as symbols of life, fertility, healing, prosperity, change, alliances and sometimes represented the “geographical” integration or the “ideological” legitimization of a territory. The Amarna Letters reveal the jour- ney of the goddess Shaushka to the Egyptian court of Amenhotep III. Akkadian, Hurrian, Hittite, and Ugaritic texts reveal the role played by this goddess in local pantheons, as well as in various foreign courts during the second millennium BCE. She was known as the goddess of war, fertility and healing and statues of the goddess were used in rituals performed before military actions, to heal diseases, to bless marriage alliances and assist births. This pa- per analyses the role of this traveling goddess in the Egyptian court of Amenhotep III. El viaje de estatuas de dioses y diosas entre cortes de grandes reyes fue un recurso conocido en el Cercano Oriente antiguo. En la Antigüedad, las estatuas de ciertos dioses y diosas fueron símbolos de vida, fertilidad, curación, prosperidad, cambio, alianzas y, en algunos casos, representaron la integración “geográfica” o la legiti- mación “ideológica” de un territorio. Las Cartas de El Amarna revelan el viaje de la estatua de la diosa Shaushka hacia la corte egipcia durante el reinado de Amenhotep III. Textos acadios, hurritas, hititas y ugaríticos indican el rol cumplido por esta diosa en panteones locales, así como en diversas cortes extranjeras durante el II milenio a.e. Fue reconocida como la diosa de la guerra, fertilidad y curación.
    [Show full text]
  • Hesiod Theogony.Pdf
    Hesiod (8th or 7th c. BC, composed in Greek) The Homeric epics, the Iliad and the Odyssey, are probably slightly earlier than Hesiod’s two surviving poems, the Works and Days and the Theogony. Yet in many ways Hesiod is the more important author for the study of Greek mythology. While Homer treats cer- tain aspects of the saga of the Trojan War, he makes no attempt at treating myth more generally. He often includes short digressions and tantalizes us with hints of a broader tra- dition, but much of this remains obscure. Hesiod, by contrast, sought in his Theogony to give a connected account of the creation of the universe. For the study of myth he is im- portant precisely because his is the oldest surviving attempt to treat systematically the mythical tradition from the first gods down to the great heroes. Also unlike the legendary Homer, Hesiod is for us an historical figure and a real per- sonality. His Works and Days contains a great deal of autobiographical information, in- cluding his birthplace (Ascra in Boiotia), where his father had come from (Cyme in Asia Minor), and the name of his brother (Perses), with whom he had a dispute that was the inspiration for composing the Works and Days. His exact date cannot be determined with precision, but there is general agreement that he lived in the 8th century or perhaps the early 7th century BC. His life, therefore, was approximately contemporaneous with the beginning of alphabetic writing in the Greek world. Although we do not know whether Hesiod himself employed this new invention in composing his poems, we can be certain that it was soon used to record and pass them on.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies in Early Mediterranean Poetics and Cosmology
    The Ruins of Paradise: Studies in Early Mediterranean Poetics and Cosmology by Matthew M. Newman A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Classical Studies) in the University of Michigan 2015 Doctoral Committee: Professor Richard Janko, Chair Professor Sara L. Ahbel-Rappe Professor Gary M. Beckman Associate Professor Benjamin W. Fortson Professor Ruth S. Scodel Bind us in time, O Seasons clear, and awe. O minstrel galleons of Carib fire, Bequeath us to no earthly shore until Is answered in the vortex of our grave The seal’s wide spindrift gaze toward paradise. (from Hart Crane’s Voyages, II) For Mom and Dad ii Acknowledgments I fear that what follows this preface will appear quite like one of the disorderly monsters it investigates. But should you find anything in this work compelling on account of its being lucid, know that I am not responsible. Not long ago, you see, I was brought up on charges of obscurantisme, although the only “terroristic” aspects of it were self- directed—“Vous avez mal compris; vous êtes idiot.”1 But I’ve been rehabilitated, or perhaps, like Aphrodite in Iliad 5 (if you buy my reading), habilitated for the first time, to the joys of clearer prose. My committee is responsible for this, especially my chair Richard Janko and he who first intervened, Benjamin Fortson. I thank them. If something in here should appear refined, again this is likely owing to the good taste of my committee. And if something should appear peculiarly sensitive, empathic even, then it was the humanity of my committee that enabled, or at least amplified, this, too.
    [Show full text]
  • Baal, Son of Dagan: in Search of Baal's Double Paternity Author(S): Noga Ayali-Darshan Source: Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol
    Baal, Son of Dagan: In Search of Baal's Double Paternity Author(s): Noga Ayali-Darshan Source: Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol. 133, No. 4 (October-December 2013), pp. 651-657 Published by: American Oriental Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7817/jameroriesoci.133.4.0651 Accessed: 28-02-2017 21:36 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms American Oriental Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of the American Oriental Society This content downloaded from 132.174.255.49 on Tue, 28 Feb 2017 21:36:59 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Baal, Son of Dagan: In Search of Baal’s Double Paternity NOGA AYALI-DARSHAN THE HEBREW UNIVERSITY The Ugaritic expression “Baal, son of Dagan” has been the subject of several studies which attempt to resolve the contradiction between the depiction of Baal as El’s son on the one hand and the expression “Baal, son of Dagan” (bʿl bn dgn) on the other. Despite the paucity of literary evidence, the majority of scholars have identified Dagan with either El or Baal, consequently attributing a single “real” father to Baal.
    [Show full text]
  • Nudity and Music in Anatolian Mythological Seduction Scenes and Iconographic Imagery
    Ora Brison Nudity and Music in Anatolian Mythological Seduction Scenes and Iconographic Imagery This essay focuses on the role of Anatolian music in erotic and sexual contexts — especially of its function in mythological seduction scenes. In these scenes, music is employed as a means of enhancing erotic seduction. A number of cultic, sexual iconographic representations associated with musical instruments and performers of music will also be discussed. Historical Background Most of the data on the music culture of the Anatolian civilizations comes from the Old Hittite and Hittite Imperial periods, dating from 1750 to 1200 bce, though some data comes from the Neo-Hittite period, namely 1200 to 800 bce.1 The textual sources relate mainly to religious state festivals, ceremonies and rituals. It is likely that Hittite music culture reflected the musical traditions of the native Anatolian cultures — the Hattians2 — as well as the influences of other migrating ethnic groups, such as the Hurrians3 or the Luwians,4 who settled in Anatolia. Hittite music culture also shows the musical influence of and fusion with the neighboring major civilizations: Mesopotamia, Egypt and the Aegean (Schuol 2004: 260). Our knowledge of Anatolian music, musical instruments, musicians, singers and performers is based on extensive archaeological evidence, textual and visual, as well as on recovered pieces of musical artifacts. Much of the data has been collected from the corpus of religious texts and cultic iconographic representations. Nevertheless, we can assume that music, song and dance played a significant role not only in reli- gious practices, but also in many aspects of daily life (de Martino 1995: 2661).
    [Show full text]
  • John David Hawkins
    STUDIA ASIANA – 9 – STUDIA ASIANA Collana fondata da Alfonso Archi, Onofrio Carruba e Franca Pecchioli Daddi Comitato Scientifico Alfonso Archi, Fondazione OrMe – Oriente Mediterraneo Amalia Catagnoti, Università degli Studi di Firenze Anacleto D’Agostino, Università di Pisa Rita Francia, Sapienza – Università di Roma Gianni Marchesi, Alma Mater Studiorum – Università di Bologna Stefania Mazzoni, Università degli Studi di Firenze Valentina Orsi, Università degli Studi di Firenze Marina Pucci, Università degli Studi di Firenze Elena Rova, Università Ca’ Foscari – Venezia Giulia Torri, Università degli Studi di Firenze Sacred Landscapes of Hittites and Luwians Proceedings of the International Conference in Honour of Franca Pecchioli Daddi Florence, February 6th-8th 2014 Edited by Anacleto D’Agostino, Valentina Orsi, Giulia Torri firenze university press 2015 Sacred Landscapes of Hittites and Luwians : proceedings of the International Conference in Honour of Franca Pecchioli Daddi : Florence, February 6th-8th 2014 / edited by Anacleto D'Agostino, Valentina Orsi, Giulia Torri. – Firenze : Firenze University Press, 2015. (Studia Asiana ; 9) http://digital.casalini.it/9788866559047 ISBN 978-88-6655-903-0 (print) ISBN 978-88-6655-904-7 (online) Graphic design: Alberto Pizarro Fernández, Pagina Maestra Front cover photo: Drawing of the rock reliefs at Yazılıkaya (Charles Texier, Description de l'Asie Mineure faite par ordre du Governement français de 1833 à 1837. Typ. de Firmin Didot frères, Paris 1839, planche 72). The volume was published with the contribution of Ente Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze. Peer Review Process All publications are submitted to an external refereeing process under the responsibility of the FUP Editorial Board and the Scientific Committees of the individual series.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham Research Online
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Durham Research Online Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 26 July 2016 Version of attached le: Accepted Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Haubold, J. (2017) 'Conict, consensus and closure in Hesiod's Theogony and Enma eli§s.',in Conict and consensus in Early Greek hexameter poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 17-38. Further information on publisher's website: http://www.cambridge.org/gb/academic/subjects/classical-studies/classical-literature/conict-and-consensus- early-greek-hexameter-poetry?format=HB Publisher's copyright statement: This material has been published in Conict and consensus in Early Greek hexameter poetry. / Edited by Paola Bassino, Lilah Grace Canevaro Barbara Graziosi. This version is free to view and download for personal use only. Not for re-distribution, re-sale or use in derivative works. c Cambridge University Press 2017 Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 http://dro.dur.ac.uk 1 Conflict, consensus and closure in Hesiod’s Theogony and Enūma eliš Johannes Haubold Hesiod’s Theogony and the Babylonian Enūma eliš both move from chaos to order, divine conflict to consensus.
    [Show full text]
  • Ugaritic Seal Metamorphoses As a Reflection of the Hittite Administration and the Egyptian Influence in the Late Bronze Age in Western Syria
    UGARITIC SEAL METAMORPHOSES AS A REFLECTION OF THE HITTITE ADMINISTRATION AND THE EGYPTIAN INFLUENCE IN THE LATE BRONZE AGE IN WESTERN SYRIA The Institute of Economics and Social Sciences of Bilkent University by B. R. KABATIAROVA In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in THE DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTORY OF ART BILKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA June 2006 To my family and Őzge I certify that I have read this thesis and that it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Archaeology and History of Art. -------------------------------------------- Dr. Marie-Henriette Gates Supervisor I certify that I have read this thesis and that it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Archaeology and History of Art. -------------------------------------------- Dr. Jacques Morin Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and that it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Archaeology and History of Art. -------------------------------------------- Dr. Geoffrey Summers Examining Committee Member Approval of the Institute of Economics and Social Sciences ------------------------------------------- Dr. Erdal Erel Director ABSTRACT UGARITIC SEAL METAMORPHOSES AS A REFLECTION OF THE HITTITE ADMINISTRATION AND THE EGYPTIAN INFLUENCE IN THE LATE BRONZE AGE IN WESTERN SYRIA Kabatiarova, B.R. M.A., Department of Archaeology and History of Art Supervisor: Doc. Dr. Marie-Henriette Gates June 2006 This study explores the ways in which Hittite political control of Northern Syria in the LBA influenced and modified Ugaritic glyptic and methods of sealing documents.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. the Origins of the Gods 5. the Origins of Mortals 6. Zeus, Hera, Poseidon, and Hades 7
    Content Chapters: 4. The Origins of The Gods 5. The Origins of Mortals 6. Zeus, Hera, Poseidon, and Hades 7. Apollo 8. Hermes, Pan, Hephaestus, and Ares 9. Aphrodite, Artemis, and Athena 10. Demeter and Related Myths 11. Dionysos 12. The Underworld 13. Introduction to Heroic Myth 14. Perseus 15. Heracles 16. Theseus 17. Myths of Crete 18. Oedipus and The Myths of Thebes 19. Jason and the Argonauts 20. The Trojan War 21. The Fall of Troy and its Aftermath 22. The Return of Odysseus 23. Aeneas 24. Legends of Early Rome CHAPTER 4 – The Origins of The Gods • Hesiod gave story of Gods as origin of universe • Cosmogony explains ‘origin of the world’ o Kosmos = world • Theogony explains “origin of the Gods” o Theos = gods • Hesiod believe cosmogony and theogony the same • Hesiod’s thousand-line poem “theogony” is hymn to Zeus o Greek version of Indo-European sky-god Children of Chaos • First came Chaos (chasm) → Gaea (mother earth) → Tartarus (bottommost) → Eros (sexual love) • From Chaos = Erebus (darkness) & Nyx (night) • Thought that the others were also children of Chaos Children of Gaea • Gaea bore Uranus (sky) & Pontus (sea) asexually • Gaea (earth) + Uranus (sky) = bore 6 male & 6 female Titans o Cronus (contends with Uranus for power) o Notable Gods = male Oceanus + female Tethys (give birth to all Gods) • Gaea bore 3 cyclopes (round eyes) o Brontes (thunderer), Steropes (flasher), Arges (brightener) • Hecatonchires (hundred-handers) o Cottus, Briareus, Gyes Hyperion’s Children • Hyperion (sun-god) father of: o Helius (sun-god), Selenê (the moon), Eos (the dawn) • Phaëthon (Oceanid), son of Helius and Clymenê o Mother married to king of Ethiopia, assured father was the sun • For confirmation journeyed to house of Helius • Helius would grant one wish to prove he was his father o Wanted to ride Helius’ chariot of the sun across the sky • Phaethon lost control bolted to earth almost setting it ablaze.
    [Show full text]
  • MYTHS of CREATION the Rise of Zeus Y Hesiod Tells of the Origin
    cHAPTER 4: MYTHS OF cREATION The Rise of Zeus y Hesiod tells of the origin of the universe through succeeding generations of gods. COSMOGONY: a story that explains the ³origin of the world´ THEOGONY: a story that explains the ³origin of the gods´ and their rise to power. y To explain Zeus¶s supremacy in the world Hesiod must go back to the beginning of all things, to the generations of chaos (chasm), Gaea (Earth), and Uranus (Sky). THE cHILDREN OF cHAOS y First came chaos and some understand it as the opening from which the other primordial beings arose. y After chaos came Gaea, the personification of the earth beneath us. y Tartarus is often confused in Greek Myth with the abode of Hades, but is personified by Hesiod as the primordial creature that Gaea has offspring with. y Eros also appears after chaos, the source of motion that brings sexual beings together to produce still more offspring. y Hesiod also believes that Erebus (darkness) and Nyx (night) came from chaos THE cHILDREN OF GAEA: THE TITANS AND THEIR cOUSINS y cyclopes and Hecatonchires had important roles to play in the world¶s early days. THE TITANS y Gaea first bore asexually Uranus y Then she bore her watery doublet Pontus y In sexual union with her son, Uranus, Gaea produced the six male and six female Titans, a word of unknown meaning. y cronus, who will contend with Uranus for power, is named as the last born. y Two notable Titans are the watery male Oceanus and female Tethys o Gave birth to all the gods o Oceanus is a river that encircles the world, where the domes of the sky touches the flat surface of the earth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birth of Athena Chikako Sugawara 3/8/18
    Orientalizing in Ancient Greek Literature and Art: The Birth of Athena Chikako Sugawara 3/8/18 In the 19th century by the discoveries and decipherment of texts from the ancient Near Eastern and Egyptian literatures, in cuneiform and in hieroglyphic writing respectively, the influence of the ancient oriental civilizations on the Archaic/ early Greek culture began to be recognized more positively. Furthermore the apparent impact of ‘the oriental’ on Greek art between the Geometric and the Archaic periods was marked, that is, the existence of the orientalizing phase in the development of the Archaic Greek art was also recognized. From that time, scholars’ attention began to turn towards the ancient Near Eastern civilizations as the great inspiration and provider of cultural sources within the Archaic and early Classical periods in particular. Our present knowledge admits that the Greeks learned much from the Near East: the civilizations of the ancient Near East played a great part in the formation of ancient Greek culture. 1 We will briefly look at this Orientalizing phenomenon in early Greek literature and art for the subject of this thesis, starting with the new dimension of the impact of the Near East on the Archaic and early Classical Greece after the discovery and decipherment of the Hittite mythological text of the Kingship in Heaven. 2 Hurrian Kumarbi Myth and the Theogony of Hesiod ‘The old question as to what extent Greek mythology used oriental models can be now discussed in the light of fresh material.’ 3 ‘With the new texts, the relation of the history of Greek epic with the oriental world can now, I think, be regarded as well established.’ 4 Immediately after the decipherment of this text, the Kingship in Heaven, its similarity with Hesiod’s Theogony was recognized, and H.
    [Show full text]