Methylerythritol Synthetase Involved in Mevalonate-Independent Isoprenoid Biosynthesis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Methylerythritol Synthetase Involved in Mevalonate-Independent Isoprenoid Biosynthesis © 2001 Nature Publishing Group http://structbio.nature.com articles Structure of 4-diphosphocytidyl-2-C- methylerythritol synthetase involved in mevalonate-independent isoprenoid biosynthesis Stéphane B. Richard1, Marianne E. Bowman1, Witek Kwiatkowski1, Ilgu Kang2, Cathy Chow2, Antonietta M. Lillo2, David E. Cane2 and Joseph P. Noel1 The YgbP protein of Escherichia coli encodes the enzyme 4-diphosphocytidyl-2-C-methylerythritol (CDP-ME) synthetase, a member of the cytidyltransferase family of enzymes. CDP-ME is an intermediate in the mevalonate- independent pathway for isoprenoid biosynthesis in a number of prokaryotic organisms, algae, the plant plastids and the malaria parasite. Because vertebrates synthesize isoprenoid precursors using a mevalonate pathway, CDP-ME synthetase and other enzymes of the mevalonate-independent pathway for isoprenoid production represent attractive targets for the structure-based design of selective antibacterial, herbicidal and antimalarial drugs. The high-resolution structures of E. coli CDP-ME synthetase in the apo form and complexed with both CTP–Mg2+ and CDP-ME–Mg2+ reveal the stereochemical principles underlying both substrate and product recognition as well as catalysis in CDP-ME synthetase. Moreover, these complexes represent the first experimental structures for any cytidyltransferase with both substrates and products bound. Isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP) and the isomeric compound, dimensional structures of CDP-ME synthetase both in the apo dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP), are the fundamental form and complexed to CTP–Mg2+ and CDP-ME–Mg2+, respec- building blocks of isoprenoids in all organisms. The isoprenoids tively. These structures reveal active site features responsible for include >23,000 naturally occurring molecules of both primary the stereochemical control of the cytidyltransferase reaction and and secondary metabolism. Isoprenoids include hopane tri- serve as three-dimensional templates for future efforts directed at © http://structbio.nature.com Group 2001 Nature Publishing terpenes, ubiquinones and menaquinones in bacteria; structure-based inhibitor design and evaluation. carotenoids, plastoquinones, mono-, sesqui-, di- and tri- terpenes and the prenyl side chains of chlorophylls in plants; and Overall three-dimensional architecture quinones, dolichols, steroids and retinoids in mammals1. IPP CDP-ME synthetase organizes as a homodimer with each sub- was generally assumed to be derived solely from mevalonate syn- unit related by a crystallographic two-fold axis. We have refined thesized from the condensation of three molecules of acetyl- the ‘apo’ form of CDP-ME synthetase to 1.55 Å resolution, the CoA. However, independent studies demonstrated the existence complex with CTP-Mg2+ to 1.5 Å resolution (Fig. 2a) and the of a novel, mevalonate-independent pathway for IPP synthesis complex with CDP-ME–Mg2+ to 1.8 Å resolution (Fig. 2b). The known as the 1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate / 2-C-methyl-D- ‘apo’ form of CDP-ME synthetase was crystallized in the pres- erythritol 4-phosphate (DXP/MEP) pathway. This mevalonate- ence of 10 mM MEP but showed no extra electron density in the independent pathway utilizes pyruvate and glyceraldehyde active site after structural elucidation. Each subunit of the 3-phosphate as starting materials for production of IPP2 (Fig. 1). homodimer is comprised of two structurally distinct domains. The DXP/MEP pathway occurs in a variety of eubacteria, The larger core domain (residues 1–136 and 160–236) is globular including several pathogenic species such as Mycobacterium in shape and maintains an α/β structure that resembles a tuberculosis, in algae, in the plastids of plant cells2 and in the api- Rossmann fold8 but which displays a distinct α/β connectivity coplast of Plasmodium falciparum3, the parasite that causes pattern with an insertion of two β-strands, β7 and β10, into a malaria. Given the essential nature of the DXP/MEP pathway in parallel 3-2-1-4-5 β-sheet. The second, much smaller lobe or these organisms and the absence of this pathway in mammals, the subdomain (residues 137–159) resembles a curved arm that enzymes comprising the DXP/MEP pathway represent potential interlocks in trans with its symmetry related arm to mediate targets for the generation of selective antibacterial4, antimalarial3 dimer formation. Moreover, the interlocking arms form part of and herbicidal5 molecules. 4-diphosphocytidyl-2-C-methylery- the MEP binding site and organize portions of the catalytic sur- thritol (CDP-ME) synthetase6,7 (alternatively known as MEP face responsible for cytidyltransferase activity (Fig. 2b). cytidyltransferase) encoded by the ygbP open reading frame of Escherichia coli catalyzes the formation of CDP-ME from MEP Relationship to other cytidyltransferases and CTP. This reaction constitutes the third step of the DXP/MEP A search for related three-dimensional structures in the Protein pathway of isoprenoid biosynthesis. We now report the three- Data Bank9 using the DALI10 server retrieved a number of 1Structural Biology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037, USA. 2Department of Chemistry, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to J.P.N. email: [email protected] nature structural biology • volume 8 number 7 • july 2001 641 © 2001 Nature Publishing Group http://structbio.nature.com articles Fig. 1 Biosynthesis of the isoprenoid precursor isopen- tenyl diphosphate (IPP, 8) via the alternative, meval- onate-independent DXP/MEP pathway. All reactions are depicted in the forward direction. The synthesis of the C5 IPP skeleton begins with the condensation of a C2 moiety from the decarboxylation of pyruvate (1) and a C3 moiety from glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate (2) to form 1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate (DXP, 3) through the action of DXP synthase32,33 (DXPS or DXS). Next, DXP is converted into 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4- phosphate (MEP, 4) by DXP reductoisomerase34,35 (DXPR or DXR) and subsequently transformed into 4-diphos- phocytidyl-2-C-methyl-D-erythritol (CDP-ME, 5) by CDP- ME synthetase6,7 (YgbP protein). Fosmidomycin acts as an effective inhibitor of DXPR3. CDP-ME is phosphory- lated on the 2-hydroxy group to form 4-diphospho- cytidyl-2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 2-phosphate (CDP-MEP; 6) in an ATP-dependent reaction by the enzyme CDP- ME kinase encoded by the ychB gene of E. coli36,37. Subsequent formation of 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 2,4-cyclodiphosphate (7) is catalyzed by the enzyme MECDP synthase encoded by the gene ygbB17,38. Additional steps, which remain to be elucidated, ulti- mately form IPP (8). cules in each enzyme are arranged in opposite fashions. In contrast, alignments of the two struc- tures using the bound CTP molecules as a guide reveals an internal pseudosymmetry in the core α/β fold of both GCT and CDP-ME synthetase (Fig. 2c). Although the cytidine base and ribose exhibit nearly identical orientations in GCT and CDP- ME synthetase, the curved triphosphate ends of the bound CTP molecules pucker in opposite directions. These alternative orientations of the © http://structbio.nature.com Group 2001 Nature Publishing triphosphate tail of CTP position each of the α-phosphates of the CTP substrates for nucle- ophilic attack by MEP in CDP-ME synthetase or glycerol 3-phosphate in GCT. The structure of CMP-NeuAc synthetase was solved in the apo form and complexed to a partially disordered enzyme cores containing a nucleotide binding fold. Currently, CDP molecule, which serves as a mimic of the true CTP substrate. three cytidyltransferase structures, which contain a core Structural alignments of E. coli CDP-ME synthetase or Neisseria nucleotide binding domain, have been described and include meningitidis CMP-NeuAc synthetase13 (data not shown) with capsule specific CMP:2-keto-3-deoxy-manno-octonic acid syn- GCT reveal that the catalytic machinery of CDP-ME synthetase thetase11 (K-CKS), CTP:glycerol-3-phosphate cytidyltrans- and CMP-NeuAc synthetase are spatially conserved with GCT ferase12 (GCT) and, most recently, CMP acylneuraminate but not shared at the primary amino acid level with GCT14. The synthetase13 (CMP-NeuAc synthetase). spatial correspondence includes the putative catalytic residues CDP-ME synthetase, CMP-NeuAc synthetase and GCT share His 14 and His 17 of GCT15 with Lys 27 and Lys 213 of CDP-ME similarly folded cores. However, the five parallel β-strands of synthetase and Lys 21 and Asp 209 of CMP-NeuAc synthetase13. GCT, which maintain a 3-2-1-4-5 topology, are interrupted in CDP-ME synthetase and CMP-NeuAc synthetase by the insertion Active site architecture of two antiparallel β-strands (β7 and β10) between β-strands 4 CTP and CDP-ME are sequestered in the active site of CDP-ME and 5 (β6 and β11) of the core β-sheet (Fig. 2c). This insertion synthetase by a glycine-rich loop spanning Pro 13–Arg 20. extends the central β-sheet and leads to a structural alteration of Selectivity for the pyrimidine base is achieved through hydrogen the nucleotide binding region and subsequent formation of a dis- bonding interactions and steric constrictions in the base-binding tinct and spatially nonoverlapping CTP binding motif in CDP- pocket that do not allow for the sequestration of larger purine ME synthetase and CMP-NeuAc synthetase. The coordinates for bases. This selectivity is specifically achieved through hydrogen K-CKS have yet to be deposited in the PDB, making a detailed bonds formed between the backbone amides of Ala 14 and Ala 15, comparison of K-CKS with either CMP-NeuAc synthetase or the carbonyl oxygens of Gly 82 and Asp 83, and the hydroxyl CDP-ME synthetase impossible at this stage. group of Ser 88. The cytosine base is stacked between the flexible By superimposing GCT and CDP-ME synthetase to constrain loop spanning β1 and β2, and the methylene portion of the the connectivity pattern of the central β-sheets and the sur- Arg 85 side chain projecting outward from the β5–αE catalytic rounding α-helices, the GCT and CDP-ME synthetase active loop.
Recommended publications
  • Enzyme Activity and Assays Introductory Article
    Enzyme Activity and Assays Introductory article Robert K Scopes, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia Article Contents . Factors that Affect Enzymatic Analysis Enzyme activity refers to the general catalytic properties of an enzyme, and enzyme assays . Initial Rates and Steady State Turnover are standardized procedures for measuring the amounts of specific enzymes in a sample. Measurement of Enzyme Activity . Measurement of Protein Concentration Factors that Affect Enzymatic Analysis . Methods for Purifying Enzymes . Summary Enzyme activity is measured in vitro under conditions that often do not closely resemble those in vivo. The objective of measuring enzyme activity is normally to determine the exactly what the concentration is (some preparations of amount of enzyme present under defined conditions, so unusual substrates may be impure, or the exact amount that activity can be compared between one sample and present may not be known). This is because the rate another, and between one laboratory and another. The measured varies with substrate concentration more rapidly conditions chosen are usually at the optimum pH, as the substrate concentration decreases, as can be seen in ‘saturating’ substrate concentrations, and at a temperature Figure 1. In most cases an enzyme assay has already been that is convenient to control. In many cases the activity is established, and the substrate concentration, buffers and measured in the opposite direction to that of the enzyme’s other parameters used previously should be used again. natural function. Nevertheless, with a complete study of There are many enzymes which do not obey the simple the parameters that affect enzyme activity it should be Michaelis–Menten formula.
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities for Catalysis in the 21St Century
    Opportunities for Catalysis in The 21st Century A Report from the Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES ADVISORY COMMITTEE SUBPANEL WORKSHOP REPORT Opportunities for Catalysis in the 21st Century May 14-16, 2002 Workshop Chair Professor J. M. White University of Texas Writing Group Chair Professor John Bercaw California Institute of Technology This page is intentionally left blank. Contents Executive Summary........................................................................................... v A Grand Challenge....................................................................................................... v The Present Opportunity .............................................................................................. v The Importance of Catalysis Science to DOE.............................................................. vi A Recommendation for Increased Federal Investment in Catalysis Research............. vi I. Introduction................................................................................................ 1 A. Background, Structure, and Organization of the Workshop .................................. 1 B. Recent Advances in Experimental and Theoretical Methods ................................ 1 C. The Grand Challenge ............................................................................................. 2 D. Enabling Approaches for Progress in Catalysis ..................................................... 3 E. Consensus Observations and Recommendations..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Recitation Section 4 Answer Key Biochemistry—Energy and Glycolysis
    MIT Department of Biology 7.014 Introductory Biology, Spring 2005 Recitation Section 4 Answer Key February 14-15, 2005 Biochemistry—Energy and Glycolysis A. Why do we care In lecture we discussed the three properties of a living organism: metabolism, regulated growth, and replication. Today we will focus on metabolism and biosynthesis. 1. It was said in lecture that chemical reactions are the basis of life. Why do we say that? Being alive implies being able to change your state in response to a change in internal or environmental conditions. We discussed previously that any change in the observable characteristics of a cell begins as and is propagated by molecular interactions. Molecular interactions propagate the signal by changing the state of molecules, i.e. by reactions. 2. Why is metabolism required for life? A cell is subject to all laws of chemistry and physics, including the first and second law of thermodynamics. Changing the state of molecules dissipates energy along the way, so getting or making new energy is essential to life. The energy is then used for many purposes, including making the building blocks and precursors and then using them to build macromolecules that make up cells—biosynthesis. 3. Can an entity that performs no chemical reactions be considered “alive?” In general, no. But there are special cases of the cells that do not perform reactions right at the moment, but have the potential to perform reactions if they encounter particular conditions. Some examples of such cells are spores in nature or frozen permanents in laboratory. If they experience certain conditions, such as availability of food for spores, or defrosting and food source for frozen permanents, these cells will again perform metabolism.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.4 the Breakdown Chemical Reactions Bonds Break and Form During Chemical Reactions
    DO NOT EDIT--Changes must be made through “File info” CorrectionKey=B 2.4 Chemical Reactions KEY CONCEPT VOCABULARY Life depends on chemical reactions. chemical reaction MAIN IDEAS reactant Bonds break and form during chemical reactions. product Chemical reactions release or absorb energy. bond energy equilibrium activation energy Connect to Your World exothermic When you hear the term chemical reaction, what comes to mind? Maybe you think endothermic of liquids bubbling in beakers. You probably do not think of the air in your breath, but most of the carbon dioxide and water vapor that you breathe out are made by chemical reactions in your cells. MAIN IDEA Bonds break and form during chemical reactions. Plant cells make cellulose by linking simple sugars together. Plant and animal cells break down sugars to get usable energy. And all cells build protein mol- ecules by bonding amino acids together. These are just a few of the chemical reactions in living things. Chemical reactions change substances into different substances by breaking and forming chemical bonds. Although the matter changes form, both matter and energy are conserved in a chemical reaction. Reactants, Products, and Bond Energy Your cells need the oxygen molecules that you breathe in. Oxygen (O2) plays a part in a series of chemical reactions that provides usable energy for your cells. These reactions, which are described in detail in the chapter Cells and Energy, break down the simple sugar glucose (C6H12O6). The process uses oxygen and glucose and results in carbon dioxide (CO2), water (H2O), and usable energy. Oxygen and glucose are the reactants.
    [Show full text]
  • Enzyme Kinetics in This Exercise We Will Look at the Catalytic Behavior of Enzymes
    1 Enzyme Kinetics In this exercise we will look at the catalytic behavior of enzymes. You will use Excel to answer the questions in the exercise section. At the end of this session, you must hand in answers to all the questions, along with print outs of any plots you created. Background Enzymes are the catalysts of biological systems and are extremely efficient and specific as catalysts. In fact, typically, an enzyme accelerates the rate of a reaction by factors of at least a million compared to the rate of the same reaction in the absence of the enzyme. Most biological reactions do not occur at perceptible rates in the absence of enzymes. One of the simplest biological reactions catalyzed by an enzyme is the hydration of CO2. The catalyst in this reaction is carbonic anhydrase. This reaction is part of the respiration cycle which expels CO2 from the body. Carbonic anhydrase is a highly efficient enzyme – each enzyme molecule 5 can catalyze the hydration of 10 CO2 molecules per second. Enzymes are highly specific. Typically a particular enzyme catalyzes only a single chemical reaction or a set of closely related chemical reactions. As is true of any catalyst, enzymes do not alter the equilibrium point of the reaction. This means that the enzyme accelerates the forward and reverse reaction by precisely the same factor. For example, consider the interconversion of A and B. A ↔ B (1) -4 -1 Suppose that in the absence of the enzyme the forward rate constant (kf) is 10 s and the -6 -1 reverse rate constant (kr) is 10 s .
    [Show full text]
  • Enzyme Catalysis: Structural Basis and Energetics of Catalysis
    PHRM 836 September 8, 2015 Enzyme Catalysis: structural basis and energetics of catalysis Devlin, section 10.3 to 10.5 1. Enzyme binding of substrates and other ligands (binding sites, structural mobility) 2. Energe(cs along reac(on coordinate 3. Cofactors 4. Effect of pH on enzyme catalysis Enzyme catalysis: Review Devlin sections 10.6 and 10.7 • Defini(ons of catalysis, transi(on state, ac(vaon energy • Michaelis-Menten equaon – Kine(c parameters in enzyme kine(cs (kcat, kcat/KM, Vmax, etc) – Lineweaver-Burk plot • Transi(on-state stabilizaon • Meaning of proximity, orientaon, strain, and electrostac stabilizaon in enzyme catalysis • General acid/base catalysis • Covalent catalysis 2015, September 8 PHRM 836 - Devlin Ch 10 2 Structure determines enzymatic catalysis as illustrated by this mechanism for ____ 2015, September 8 PHRM 836 - Devlin Ch 10 www.studyblue.com 3 Substrate binding by enzymes • Highly complementary interac(ons between substrate and enzyme – Hydrophobic to hydrophobic – Hydrogen bonding – Favorable Coulombic interac(ons • Substrate binding typically involves some degree of conformaonal change in the enzyme – Enzymes need to be flexible for substrate binding and catalysis. – Provides op(mal recogni(on of substrates – Brings cataly(cally important residues to the right posi(on. 2015, September 8 PHRM 836 - Devlin Ch 10 4 Substrate binding by enzymes • Highly complementary interac(ons between substrate and enzyme – Hydrophobic to hydrophobic – Hydrogen bonding – Favorable Coulombic interac(ons • Substrate binding typically involves some degree of conformaonal change in the enzyme – Enzymes need to be flexible for substrate binding and catalysis. – Provides op(mal recogni(on of substrates – Brings cataly(cally important residues to the right posi(on.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF (Chapter 5
    ~---=---5 __ Heterogeneous Catalysis 5.1 I Introduction Catalysis is a term coined by Baron J. J. Berzelius in 1835 to describe the property of substances that facilitate chemical reactions without being consumed in them. A broad definition of catalysis also allows for materials that slow the rate of a reac­ tion. Whereas catalysts can greatly affect the rate of a reaction, the equilibrium com­ position of reactants and products is still determined solely by thermodynamics. Heterogeneous catalysts are distinguished from homogeneous catalysts by the dif­ ferent phases present during reaction. Homogeneous catalysts are present in the same phase as reactants and products, usually liquid, while heterogeneous catalysts are present in a different phase, usually solid. The main advantage of using a hetero­ geneous catalyst is the relative ease of catalyst separation from the product stream that aids in the creation of continuous chemical processes. Additionally, heteroge­ neous catalysts are typically more tolerant ofextreme operating conditions than their homogeneous analogues. A heterogeneous catalytic reaction involves adsorption of reactants from a fluid phase onto a solid surface, surface reaction of adsorbed species, and desorption of products into the fluid phase. Clearly, the presence of a catalyst provides an alter­ native sequence of elementary steps to accomplish the desired chemical reaction from that in its absence. If the energy barriers of the catalytic path are much lower than the barrier(s) of the noncatalytic path, significant enhancements in the reaction rate can be realized by use of a catalyst. This concept has already been introduced in the previous chapter with regard to the CI catalyzed decomposition of ozone (Figure 4.1.2) and enzyme-catalyzed conversion of substrate (Figure 4.2.4).
    [Show full text]
  • Lactate in the Brain: from Metabolic End-Product to Signalling Molecule
    REVIEWS Lactate in the brain: from metabolic end-product to signalling molecule Pierre J. Magistretti1,2,3* and Igor Allaman2 Abstract | Lactate in the brain has long been associated with ischaemia; however, more recent evidence shows that it can be found there under physiological conditions. In the brain, lactate is formed predominantly in astrocytes from glucose or glycogen in response to neuronal activity signals. Thus, neurons and astrocytes show tight metabolic coupling. Lactate is transferred from astrocytes to neurons to match the neuronal energetic needs, and to provide signals that modulate neuronal functions, including excitability, plasticity and memory consolidation. In addition, lactate affects several homeostatic functions. Overall, lactate ensures adequate energy supply, modulates neuronal excitability levels and regulates adaptive functions in order to set the ‘homeostatic tone’ of the nervous system. Pyruvate dehydrogenase When studied at the organ level, brain energy meta­ Notably, under physiological conditions, the (PDH). The first component bolism can be considered as being almost fully oxida­ lactate:pyruvate concentration ratio is at least 10:1 enzyme of the pyruvate tive: elegant studies pioneered in the 1940s and 1950s (REF. 11). Thus, when considering the intercellular trans­ dehydrogenase complex; by Schmitt and Kety1 and later by Sokoloff 2 showed fer of a glycolytic substrate, lactate is the predominant it converts pyruvate into acetyl-CoA, which enters the that glucose is the obligatory physiological energy substrate in the brain. This ratio can also massively tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle substrate of the brain and is metabolized to CO2 and increase under hypoxia, as decreases in the partial for cellular respiration.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthetic Biology Applications Inventory
    INVENTORY OF SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY PRODUCTS – EXISTING AND POSSIBLE (Draft – July 27, 2012) Why This Inventory? For good or ill, new technologies are often defined by a few iconic examples that capture the public imagination. Early on, nanotechnology was defined by its application to stain-resistant clothing and sunscreens, convenient improvements but hardly transformational. Of course, the real revolution was occurring in the background, which involved a newfound ability to see, simulate, and manipulate matter at an atomic scale. Slowly, it became apparent that nanoscale science and engineering were having pervasive impacts across multiple economic sectors and products, as well as up and down value chains, and creating significant potential for improvements in costs and efficiency. So far, synthetic biology has been associated with a few limited applications, but this initial inventory provides a glimpse of its impact on multiple sectors ranging from energy to pharmaceuticals, chemicals, and food. The real power of synthetic biology may be creating a field of knowledge critical to the design of new technologies and manufacturing processes in general. This exploratory inventory is an attempt to look over the horizon of this emerging science. As such, it is a “work in progress” and we hope others will help us as we update and expand the inventory. Research on specific applications or near-commercial activities does not guarantee eventual market entry and economic impact, but the breadth of commercial and upstream activity is important to track as the science advances. Methodology This inventory of the applications of synthetic biology was compiled from a) a Lexis-Nexis search of US newspapers and newswires on the terms “’synthetic biology’ and applications” for the years 2008-2011; b) a Web of Science search on the term “synthetic biology” for 2008-2011; c) a visual search of project descriptions and websites entered into the 2010 and 2011 iGEM competition, as provided on the iGEM website1; and d) a web search for specific companies and synthetic biology via Google.
    [Show full text]
  • Heterogeneous Catalyst Deactivation and Regeneration: a Review
    Catalysts 2015, 5, 145-269; doi:10.3390/catal5010145 OPEN ACCESS catalysts ISSN 2073-4344 www.mdpi.com/journal/catalysts Review Heterogeneous Catalyst Deactivation and Regeneration: A Review Morris D. Argyle and Calvin H. Bartholomew * Chemical Engineering Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel: +1-801-422-4162, Fax: +1-801-422-0151. Academic Editor: Keith Hohn Received: 30 December 2013 / Accepted: 12 September 2014 / Published: 26 February 2015 Abstract: Deactivation of heterogeneous catalysts is a ubiquitous problem that causes loss of catalytic rate with time. This review on deactivation and regeneration of heterogeneous catalysts classifies deactivation by type (chemical, thermal, and mechanical) and by mechanism (poisoning, fouling, thermal degradation, vapor formation, vapor-solid and solid-solid reactions, and attrition/crushing). The key features and considerations for each of these deactivation types is reviewed in detail with reference to the latest literature reports in these areas. Two case studies on the deactivation mechanisms of catalysts used for cobalt Fischer-Tropsch and selective catalytic reduction are considered to provide additional depth in the topics of sintering, coking, poisoning, and fouling. Regeneration considerations and options are also briefly discussed for each deactivation mechanism. Keywords: heterogeneous catalysis; deactivation; regeneration 1. Introduction Catalyst deactivation, the loss over time of catalytic activity and/or selectivity, is a problem of great and continuing concern in the practice of industrial catalytic processes. Costs to industry for catalyst replacement and process shutdown total billions of dollars per year. Time scales for catalyst deactivation vary considerably; for example, in the case of cracking catalysts, catalyst mortality may be on the order of seconds, while in ammonia synthesis the iron catalyst may last for 5–10 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Catalysis
    1 1 Introduction to Catalysis Ask the average person in the street what a catalyst is, and he or she will probably tell you that a catalyst is what one has under the car to clean up the exhaust. Indeed, the automotive exhaust converter represents a very successful application of cataly- sis; it does a great job in removing most of the pollutants from the exhaust leaving the engines of cars. However, catalysis has a much wider scope of application than abating pollution. Catalysis in Industry Catalysts are the workhorses of chemical transformations in the industry. Approximately 85–90 % of the products of chemical industry are made in cata- lytic processes. Catalysts are indispensable in . Production of transportation fuels in one of the approximately 440 oil refi- neries all over the world. Production of bulk and fine chemicals in all branches of chemical industry. Prevention of pollution by avoiding formation of waste (unwanted byproducts). Abatement of pollution in end-of-pipe solutions (automotive and industrial exhaust). A catalyst offers an alternative, energetically favorable mechanism to the non- catalytic reaction, thus enabling processes to be carried out under industrially feasible conditions of pressure and temperature. For example, living matter relies on enzymes, which are the most specific cata- lysts one can think of. Also, the chemical industry cannot exist without catalysis, which is an indispensable tool in the production of bulk chemicals, fine chemicals and fuels. For scientists and engineers catalysis is a tremendously challenging, highly multi- disciplinary field. Let us first see what catalysis is, and then why it is so important for mankind.
    [Show full text]
  • Math for Biology - an Introduction
    Math for Biology - An Introduction Terri A. Grosso Outline Math for Biology - An Introduction Differential Equations - An Overview The Law of Terri A. Grosso Mass Action Enzyme Kinetics CMACS Workshop 2012 January 6, 2011 Terri A. Grosso Math for Biology - An Introduction Math for Biology - An Introduction Terri A. Grosso Outline 1 Differential Equations - An Overview Differential Equations - An Overview The Law of 2 The Law of Mass Action Mass Action Enzyme Kinetics 3 Enzyme Kinetics Terri A. Grosso Math for Biology - An Introduction Differential Equations - Our Goal Math for Biology - An Introduction Terri A. Grosso Outline We will NOT be solving differential equations Differential Equations - An Overview The tools - Rule Bender and BioNetGen - will do that for The Law of us Mass Action This lecture is designed to give some background about Enzyme Kinetics what the programs are doing Terri A. Grosso Math for Biology - An Introduction Differential Equations - An Overview Math for Biology - An Introduction Terri A. Grosso Differential Equations contain the derivatives of (possibly) unknown functions. Outline Differential Represent how a function is changing. Equations - An Overview We work with first-order differential equations - only The Law of Mass Action include first derivatives Enzyme Generally real-world differential equations are not directly Kinetics solvable. Often we use numerical approximations to get an idea of the unknown function's shape. Terri A. Grosso Math for Biology - An Introduction A few solutions. Figure: Some solutions to f 0(x) = 2 Differential Equations - Starting from the solution Math for 0 Biology - An A differential equation: f (x) = C Introduction Terri A.
    [Show full text]