Stafford Western Access Route

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Stafford Western Access Route SWAS/01 STAFFORD WESTERN ACCESS ROUTE GEOARCHAEOLOGICAL AND PALAEOENVIRONMENTAL REPORT commissioned by Amey November 2015 STAFFORD WESTERN ACCESS ROUTE GEOARCHAEOLOGICAL AND PALAEOENVIRONMENTAL REPORT commissioned by Amey November 2015 HA JOB NO. SWAS/01 PROJECT MANAGER Mike Kimber HAS NO. 1139 AUTHOR Emma Tetlow, Mike Kimber project info project NGR SJ 91725 23465 FIELDWORK Emma Tetlow, Robert Blackburn project team project PARISH Creswell GRAPHICS Rafael Maya-Torcelly LOCAL AUTHORITY Staffordshire County Council APPROVED BY Mike Kimber – Project Manager OASIS REF. headland3-228042 © 2015 by Headland Archaeology (UK) Ltd MIDLANDS & WEST Headland Archaeology Unit 1, Premier Business Park, Faraday Road, Hereford HR4 9NZ 01432 364 901 [email protected] www.headlandarchaeology.com PROJECT SUMMARY As part of archaeological investigations in the corridor of the Stafford Western Access Route, a two phase geoarchaeological review was undertaken. The first stage was a review of the existing borehole data produced by Sub Surface - Site Investigation, Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants. The second was a watching brief during a further stage of geotechnical works. The aim of both phases was to record the presence or absence of peat deposits across the development area (DA), and to investigate the geoarchaeological and palaeoenvironmental potential of these peats. The proposed road corridor crosses the eastern extreme of the Doxey Marshes SSSI which abuts the outskirts of the County Town of Stafford. Substantial deposits of peat, organic-rich deposits and humic silts and clays were recorded in Design Areas 1, 2 and 3. The depth varied spatially across the site, the peat found in borehole C-CP09A/R009A exceeded 10m with the base of the deposit at 13.5m. During the second phase, further investigations were undertaken within the town of Stafford and at Doxey Marsh to the west where additional deep peat sequences were located. File Name: SWAS-01-Reportv4.indd File 2015 by Headland Archaeology (UK) Ltd Archaeology Headland 2015 by © CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND 1 2 METHOD 1 2.1 PHASE 1 1 2.2 PHASE 2 1 3 RESULTS 2 3.1 PHASE 1 BOREHOLE REVIEW 2 Design Area 1 (ILLUS 3) 2 Design Area 2 (ILLUS 4) 2 Design Area 3 (ILLUS 5 AND 6) 2 Design Area 4 (ILLUS 7) 2 Design Area 5 2 3.2 MINI-BOREHOLE REVIEW 2 Design Area 1 2 Design Area 2 2 Design Area 3 2 Design Area 5 2 3.3 WATCHING BRIEF 15 Section A – Doxey Marsh (ILLUS 9) 15 Section B – Greyfriars (ILLUS 10) 15 Section C – Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd (ILLUS 11) 15 Section D – Doxey Road Railway Bridge (ILLUS 12) 15 4 DISCUSSION 15 4.1 PALAEOENVIRONMENTS 15 4.2 CULTURAL EVIDENCE 16 5 CONCLUSIONS 16 6 REFERENCES 22 7 APPENDICES 23 APPENDIX 1 BOREHOLE DATA 23 APPENDIX 2 WATCHING BRIEF BOREHOLES 27 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS ILLUS 1 Site location ix ILLUS 2 Site plan 3 ILLUS 3 Phase 1 - Design Area 1/Fence Diagram 5 ILLUS 4 Phase 1 - Design Area 2/Fence Diagram 7 ILLUS 5 Phase 1 - Design Area 3/Fence Diagram 8 ILLUS 6 Phase 1 - Design Area 4/Fence Diagram 9 ILLUS 7 Phase 1 - Design Area 5/Fence Diagram 11 ILLUS 8 Phase 1 - Mini Boreholes/Fence Diagram 13 ILLUS 9 Phase 2 - Section A/Fence Diagram 17 ILLUS 10 Phase 2 - Section B/Fence Diagram 19 ILLUS 11 Phase 2 - Section C/Fence Diagram 20 ILLUS 12 Phase 2 - Section D/Fence Diagram 21 File Name: SWAS-01-Reportv4.indd File 2015 by Headland Archaeology (UK) Ltd Archaeology Headland 2015 by © STAFFORD WESTERN ACCESS ROUTE (SWAS/01) 390000 390500 391000 391500 Doxey Marshes and central Staord Staord Staordshire 325000 INSETinset ILLUSillus 02 2 324500 0 200km STAFFORD 324000 illuswILLUS 202 DOXEY MIDLANDS & WEST Unit 1, Premier Business Park Faraday Road Hereford HR4 9NZ 01432 364 901 www.headlandarchaeology.com File Name: SWAS-01-Reportv4.indd File 323500 KEY development boundary CASTLETOWN natural England SSSI boundary N 0 500m scale 1:8,000 @ A3 2015 by Headland Archaeology (UK) Ltd Archaeology Headland 2015 by ILLUS 1 © Ordnance Survey © Crown copyright 2010 . All rights reserved. Licence no. AL 100013329 no. Licence reserved. rights 2010 . All copyright Survey © Crown Ordnance Site location HEADLAND ARCHAEOLOGY (UK) LTD STAFFORD WESTERN ACCESS ROUTE GEOARCHAEOLOGICAL AND PALAEOENVIRONMENTAL REPORT Anaerobic conditions, produced by these wet conditions will also 1 INTRODUCTION favour preservation of other fragile palaeoenvironmental evidence Staffordshire County Council is seeking planning permission to such as pollen, insects and waterlogged plant remains. This type of construct a new highway to the west of the county town, Stafford, evidence can be used to interrogate a number of questions including between Greyfriars Place, Doxey Road and Martin Drive. The works the nature of human activity in the area, land use, vegetation change associated with the proposed highway also require the creation of and other anthropogenic and natural factors. a flood compensatory storage site located within the Doxey and Tillington Marshes Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI). Drier areas of ground forming terraces, islands within, and on the fringes of the floodplain also have the potential to have been focus Headland Archaeology was commissioned to undertake a two for human activity, throughout prehistory and into the historic phase geoarchaeological review. The first stage was a review of the period. existing borehole data produced by Sub Surface – Site Investigation, Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants. The second was a watching brief during a further stage of geotechnical works. The aim of both phases was to record the presence or absence of peat 2 METHOD deposits across the development area (DA), and to investigate the The geoarchaeological review was undertaken in two phases, the first geoarchaeological and palaeoenvironmental potential of these consisted of the review of existing data from previous geotechnical peats. investigations. The second comprised an archaeological watching brief during a further phase of geotechnical investigations in September 2015. 1.1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND The solid geology underlying the scheme is the Triassic Keuper 2.1 PHASE 1 Marls of the Mercia Mudstone Group, the drift geology include A geoarchaeological assessment was made of the records produced substantial deposits of alluvium (BGS 1974). This is overlain by by the developers’ geotechnical contractors, Sub Surface – Site glaciofluvial deposits (sand and Gravel) of the Devensian glaciation Investigation, Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants. All records (118,000–10,000 BP*). This area is thought to have been ice free by were made and provided by Sub-Surface geotechnical investigators 13,490 BP, nonetheless, periglacial conditions remained until the including borehole logs and fence diagrams. This initial phase of onset of enhanced climatic amelioration, a millennia later (Morgan borehole extraction and recording was not archaeologically monitored. 1973). Overlying the glaciofluvial deposits are discontinuous strips File Name: SWAS-01-Reportv4.indd File of alluvium (clay, silt, sand and gravel) associated with the River Sow. On receipt of the documentary evidence, the environmental archaeologist assessed the stratigraphy and sedimentology of each Areas of peat were identified during geotechnical investigations individual borehole. by Sub Surface (2015) and CC Ground Investigations. The peats and alluvial deposits are also associated with the Holocene activity of the River Sow. 2.2 PHASE 2 The results of each borehole have been discussed individually and describe: Such deposits may have the potential for holding both significant • Overview of the sedimentology/stratigraphy; archaeological and palaeoenvironmental evidence. Cultural 2015 by Headland Archaeology (UK) Ltd Archaeology Headland 2015 by evidence such as wooden trackways, bridges, revetments and • Presence/absence of archaeologically and palaeoenvironmentally sensitive deposits and their potential, if any. © fishing structures may be preserved as a result of waterlogging. 1 STAFFORD WESTERN ACCESS ROUTE SWAS/01 deeper and with four discrete units of organic rich material which 3 RESULTS suggest a more dynamic environment than seen in Area 1. A similar The results of the review and monitoring are described below; effect may be observed in B–CP02B/R002B which also suggests locations are shown on ILLUS 2; full stratigraphic information is given a greater degree of alluvial activity. Up to 4.8m of made ground in Appendices 1 and 2. In summary, the general distribution of overlay deposits in this area. deposits of palaeoenvironmental potential is as follows: Area Summary of deposit sequence Design Area 3 (ILLUS 5 AND 6) Phase 2/Section A Complex sequence of peat, organic rich and A single borehole was recovered from this area, as with Area 2, alluvial deposits approx 4m thick adjacent to the the stratigraphy is more complex with two units of gravelly peat River Sow; giving way to simple alluvium and intercalated by clayey peat. This finally gives way to a peat deposit then glacial deposits further from the river. with visible plant remains and shell and subsequently a silty clay with Phase 1/Design Area 1 Peat up to 10.9m thick in places present across shell. Up to 4.1m of made ground overlay these deposits. entire area overlying alluvium. Phase 1/Design Area 2 & Phase 2/Section B Thin layers of peat and organic rich deposits Design Area 4 (ILLUS 7) interleaved with alluvium with a total thickness Evidence of peat or organic rich deposits were absent in this area. of up to 13m. With the exception of one borehole, the made ground gave way Phase 1/Design Area 3 & Phase 2/Section C Layers of peat up to 3m thick interleaved with directly to unsorted glacial till. The exception was D-CP02 which organic rich alluvium with a total sequence contained several deposits of gravels, sands, clay and silt – the basal thickness of at least 15m. deposit also containing shell, which were interpreted as of alluvial Phase 1/Design Area 4 Alluvial sands and gravels.
Recommended publications
  • Sow and Penk Internal Drainage Board (IDB) BAP Area Monitoring
    Sow and Penk Internal Drainage Board (IDB) BAP area monitoring River Sow floodplain ©Matt Jones Baseline monitoring February 2016 Introduction The IDB has a direct capacity to exercise control over a number of watercourses within the Sow and Penk area (see Map 1), it is therefore of principal importance to suitably monitor the effect of work carried out on IDB maintained watercourses to assess its impact on the biodiversity of the wider riparian environment. To effectively monitor ecological systems in order to develop and deliver beneficial policies and practices, baseline data must be gathered to provide a benchmark to measure fluctuations in habitats or species populations over time (OECD, 2001), particularly in relation to appropriate habitat management and reducing biodiversity loss. Staffordshire Wildlife Trust has been commissioned to monitor the extent of Water vole Arvicola amphibious and Flowering-rush Butomus umbellatus to help the IDB fulfil its duty conserve biodiversity. Current baseline data A desktop study was carried out using Staffordshire Ecological Records (SER) ecological records database to output all existing records of Flowering-rush B. umbellatus and European Water Vole A. amphibious within the Sow and Penk IDB Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) area. The current available data originates from a number of sources and surveys, notably records from structured surveys and monitoring including, but not limited to Staffordshire Mammal Group surveys, structured surveys carried out by Staffordshire Wildlife Trust and surveys undertaken as part of the data collection for the Flora of Staffordshire (Hawksford, et al., 2011). This data will form a primary baseline from which data collected through future surveys can be compared to monitor populations of A.
    [Show full text]
  • ·Ct7ttlestonb .Btl.NDBED • • .PENKR.IDGE UNIQN Comprises the '21 P'lll"Ishes .Ood Townships Of
    ·Ct7TTLESTONB .Btl.NDBED • • .PENKR.IDGE UNIQN comprises the '21 p'lll"ishes .ood townships of ..:Actou-with-Bednall, 81-ewood, Bashbury3 Cannock, Cheslyn-Hay.. Churok­ Eaton, OoppenhaU, DuD.StQn, Essington, Featherstone, Hatherton, Hilto~ HQJltington, Kinv.aston, Lapley, Norton-Canes, Penkridge, Sar.edon, Shares­ hill, Stretton, and Great Wyrley. Its registm!Uu. ailltricl ~omprises also the ~xtra-paroohhll place i.lalk>d Teddesley Hay, and in 1841 contained 1-6.07 -i iwhabUants, of whom t:l228 were males and 7846 females, living in :3!42 hot.tse.$, besides which the;re were 131 uninhabited houses, aoo ten building, when the census was taken in that year. The Union W01·klwuse is an old building at BBEWOOD, but x~eeived. such additions between 1838 and 1842 as have rendered it capable of accommodating 200 inmates. It has • well-propo;rtiQned ooard-room, and very comfortable hospital wards. The Guardians meet on alternate Thursdays, at 11 o'clock. The manage­ ment of the Union is celebrated for its admirable blending of economy and liberality ; and in 1850, the Poor Law Inspector of the district informed the Guardians that out of 38 Unions under his inspection, Penkridge had the smallest amount of taxation per acre, and gave the largest average amount cl relief to individual paupers. The cost of relieving the poor was £3719 in 1846; £!363 in 18-18; and £3956 iu 1850. The Union embraces an 11rea of 94 square miles, and the gross annual value .of its rateable property is about £110,000, so that its poor rates have averaged less than 9d.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to the Local Boundary Commission for England Further Electoral Review of Staffordshire Stage 1 Consultation
    Submission to the Local Boundary Commission for England Further Electoral Review of Staffordshire Stage 1 Consultation Proposals for a new pattern of divisions Produced by Peter McKenzie, Richard Cressey and Mark Sproston Contents 1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................1 2 Approach to Developing Proposals.........................................................................1 3 Summary of Proposals .............................................................................................2 4 Cannock Chase District Council Area .....................................................................4 5 East Staffordshire Borough Council area ...............................................................9 6 Lichfield District Council Area ...............................................................................14 7 Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council Area ....................................................18 8 South Staffordshire District Council Area.............................................................25 9 Stafford Borough Council Area..............................................................................31 10 Staffordshire Moorlands District Council Area.....................................................38 11 Tamworth Borough Council Area...........................................................................41 12 Conclusions.............................................................................................................45
    [Show full text]
  • Doxey Marshes Stafford
    RESERVES WALK STAFFS WT Doxey Marshes Stafford oxey Marshes is a nationally natural bends back in the artificially Continue along the path as it important reserve for hundreds straightened River Sow, lowering the heads past the river. The large of birds. Stretching from the M6 height of some of the areas and willow trees are some of the Dalmost right into the centre of Stafford, creating the islands you can see in front 4oldest on the reserve. They have been the Site of Special Scientific Interest of you. The result has been a more pollarded, a management technique follows the floodplain of the River Sow diverse habitat and also areas which which stops them becoming too large, and is a mix of wet grassland, reedbed can store extra floodwater to help whilst providing useful timber in the and rush pasture creating a haven for protect Stafford from flooding. past. These old willows with their old many different species of bird. branches, holes and deadwood provide Carry on along the path and great roosts for bats. then drop down a short slope, From the car park at the end of turning right onto Warren’s Follow the path as it heads Wootton Drive near the M6 2Lane. Cary on down this track before along the river until you reach a junction follow the path around stopping off at the viewing platform on kissing gate. Go through this 1the back of the houses away from the your left. This is Boundary Flash, and gate5 to the main bird hide. This hide motorway.
    [Show full text]
  • 3232 the LONDON GAZETTE, 9Ra MARCH 1979
    3232 THE LONDON GAZETTE, 9ra MARCH 1979 Forsbrook, Staffordshire Moorlands District, Stafford- (29) New diversion channels of the River Stour, near shire. Wilden, within the parish of Stourport-on-Severn, Wyre (5) River Erewr.Eh, from the downstream face of the B6018 Forest District, Hereford and Worcester. read bridge at Kirkby-in-Ashfteld, lo ejnsiing main (30) River Arrow at the new gauging station near Broom, river at Portland Farm, Pinxton, near Kirkby-in- within the parishes of Bidford-on-Avon, and Salford Ashficld, Ashfteld District, Nottinghamshire. Priors, Stratford-on-Avon District, Warwickshire. (6) River Trent near Tiltensor, within the parishes of (31) Horsbere Brook, from the upstream face of the road Bailaston and S^cne Rural, Stafford Borough, Stafford- bridge at Brockworth Road (Green Street) to existing shire. main river at Mill Bridge Hucclecote within the parishes (7) River Trent near Darlaston, within the parish of Stone of Brockworth, and Hucclecote, Tewkesbury Borough, Rural, Stafford Borough, Staffordshire. Gloucestershire. (8) River Trent near Sandon, within the parish of Salt (32) New Diversion channel of the Horsbere Brook to and Enson, Stafford Borough, Staffordshire. River Severn, near Abloads Court, within the parish of (9) River Sow near Tillington, Stafford, Stafford Borough, Longford, Tewkesbury Borough, Gloucestershire. St-dffordsh:rs. (33) New Diversion channels of the Horsbere Brook, near (10) River Trent near Hoo ML'I, within the parishes of Drymeadow Farm, within the parishes of Innsworth Colwich and Ingestre, Stafford Sorough, Staffordshire. and Longford, Tewkesbury Borough, Gloucestershire. (11) River Penk near Kinvaston, within the parishes of (34) River Little Avon, from the upstream face of the Penkridge and Stretton, South Staffordshire District, .
    [Show full text]
  • North Housing Market Area Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Needs Assessment : Final Report Brown, P, Scullion, LC and Niner, P
    North housing market area Gypsy and Traveller accommodation needs assessment : Final report Brown, P, Scullion, LC and Niner, P Title North housing market area Gypsy and Traveller accommodation needs assessment : Final report Authors Brown, P, Scullion, LC and Niner, P Type Monograph URL This version is available at: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/35864/ Published Date 2007 USIR is a digital collection of the research output of the University of Salford. Where copyright permits, full text material held in the repository is made freely available online and can be read, downloaded and copied for non-commercial private study or research purposes. Please check the manuscript for any further copyright restrictions. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. North Housing Market Area Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Needs Assessment Final report Philip Brown and Lisa Hunt Salford Housing & Urban Studies Unit University of Salford Pat Niner Centre for Urban and Regional Studies University of Birmingham December 2007 2 About the Authors Philip Brown and Lisa Hunt are Research Fellows in the Salford Housing & Urban Studies Unit (SHUSU) at the University of Salford. Pat Niner is a Senior Lecturer in the Centre for Urban and Regional Studies (CURS) at the University of Birmingham The Salford Housing & Urban Studies Unit is a dedicated multi-disciplinary research and consultancy unit providing a range of services relating to housing and urban management to public and private sector clients. The Unit brings together researchers drawn from a range of disciplines including: social policy, housing management, urban geography, environmental management, psychology, social care and social work.
    [Show full text]
  • Environment Agency Midlands Region
    Environment Agency Midlands Region E n v i r o n m e n t A g e n c y En v ir o n m e n t A g e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE SOUTHERN REGION Guildbourne House. Chatsworth Road, W orthing, West Sussex BN1 1 1LD John Fitzsimons Regional Flood Defence Manager Environment Agency Sapphire East 550 Streetsbrook Road Solihull B91 1QT Tel 0121 711 2324 Fax 0121 711 5824 1 ISBN 185705 568 3 ©Environment Agency All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the Environment Agency. Cover: Shrewsbury Flooding J9 Copyright: Shropshire Star HO-4/OI -150-A l r AGENCY 070604 Report October/Novembcr 2000 cS7\ - ^ CONTENTS Chapter 1 Executive Summary 1 Chapter 2 Event Management 2 Chapter 3 Flood Forecasting 4 3.1 Weather Forecast Accuracy and Timeliness 4 3.2 Agency Telemetry, Outstation & System Performance 7 3.3 Ability of Agency to Predict Levels Using Current Models 8 3.4 Issues Arising 9 3.5 Recommendations 9 Chapter 4 Flood Warning 18 4.1 Trigger/Threshold Levels for Warnings 18 4.2 Warnings Issued & Lead Times against Target Lead Times_18 _ _____ ____4.3-Number of Properties Receiving Warnings 33 4.4 Effectiveness of Flood Warning Dissemination Methods 38 4.5 Issues Arising ’ 40 4.6 Recommendations 40 Chapter 5 Event Impact 42 5.1 Introduction 42 5.2 Event Hydrology 42 5.3 Properties & Infrastructure Affected by Flooding 51 5.4 Issues and Recommendations
    [Show full text]
  • Staffordshire Water Meadows Survey
    Staffordshire Water Meadows Survey March 2008 March 2008 Staffordshire Water Meadows Survey By Paul Breeze, Keith Challis and Mark Kincey HP VISTA Centre [email protected] for Staffordshire County Council For further information please contact: Alex Jones (Director) Birmingham Archaeology The University of Birmingham Edgbaston Birmingham B15 2TT Tel: 0121 414 5513 Fax: 0121 414 5516 E-Mail: [email protected] Web Address: www.barch.bham.ac.uk © 2008 University of Birmingham Page 1 Survey of Water Meadows in Staffordshire SUMMARY The Staffordshire water meadows survey was commissioned in September 2007 by Staffordshire County Council, and took the form of a large scale landscape assessment of the location, extent and survival of the predominantly post-medieval agricultural systems known as water meadows within the county. This survey comprised the analysis of 1st edition Ordnance Survey data for the entire length of all identifiable watercourses within the county of Staffordshire, followed by the examination of identified targets within two series of aerial photographs, and was focused around the major river valleys. A total of 1543km of watercourses were visually examined within the 1st edition dataset, followed by an estimated 300 aerial photographs, from two catalogues of imagery, the Staffordshire County Council 1963 and 2000 vertical series. This analysis was intended to allow the identification of the location and extent of possible water meadows within Staffordshire, and the assessment of the changing condition of water meadow sites over time, through the production of a GIS database. This desk-based assessment was then to be followed by field examination of a representative sample of targets in order to test the veracity of the GIS model.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stafford Branch Canal / River Sow Navigation St
    THE STAFFORD BRANCH CANAL / RIVER SOW NAVIGATION ST THOMAS’ / BASWICH AQUEDUCT: AN INSIGHT Researched and written by David Jones Introduction The Stafford Branch Canal left the Staffordshire and Worcestershire Canal at Baswich, near St.Thomas’ Bridge (Bridge 101), opposite the site of the former Baswich Salt Works (now the Baswich Industrial Estate), and there was an elegant Roving Bridge at the junction. There was then a small pound (about 100 feet long and 20 feet wide) with sandstone walls; the towpath and Lock House were on the left. The channel led to a cast-iron trough aqueduct over a drainage channel which then directly entered St.Thomas’ (or Baswich) Lock. This was a most unusual arrangement on the canal system The lock was built to the same dimensions as locks on the Staffordshire and Worcestershire Canal and had a nominal fall of 6 feet 6 inches but the actual amount depended on the river level. Boats would leave the lock and turn left to follow the River Sow upstream. After about a mile, boats would enter a short channel (to the left of the White Bridge) that led to a wharf just before Green Bridge in the centre of Stafford. The Aqueduct It seems that the decision to fill in the Lock and remove the Aqueduct and small wooden bridge alongside the aqueduct over the Deepmore Drain was taken in June 1935. Three months later it was reported that the lock had been demolished. In March 1936 it was confirmed that the lock had been demolished but the small wooden bridge alongside had been retained “as the deep sides of the drain would need fencing if the bridge were demolished.” It was also stated that the bridge was in good condition.1 At present (January 2016) the only information known about St Thomas’ (Baswich) Aqueduct is that it was a cast-iron trough which directly entered St Thomas’ (Baswich) Lock.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stafford Branch Canal / River Sow Navigation St
    THE STAFFORD BRANCH CANAL / RIVER SOW NAVIGATION ST THOMAS’ (BASWICH) LOCK IN 1971 Researched and written by David Jones Introduction The Stafford Branch Canal left the Staffordshire and Worcestershire Canal at Baswich, near St.Thomas’ Bridge (Bridge 101), opposite the site of the former Baswich Salt Works (now the Baswich Industrial Estate), and there was an elegant Roving Bridge at the junction. There was then a small pound, about 100 feet long and 20 feet wide, with the towpath and Lock House on the left (west). The left side of the pound was mainly edged with sandstone blocks but was turf-sided on the right. Beyond the Lock House, the pound narrowed and the channel led to a cast-iron trough aqueduct over the Deepmore Drain. A small wooden bridge carried the towpath alongside the aqueduct on the left. The aqueduct led directly into the Lock. Below the Lock was a short channel which led to the River Sow. Boats would then turn left and follow the River Sow upstream; after a short distance, the towpath crossed the River Penk (on the left) at its confluence with the River Sow on what was probably known as the Ladder Bridge. After about a mile, boats would enter a short channel (to the left of the White Bridge); the channel was about 15 feet wide and 8 to 10 feet from the river, with the towpath in between, and led to a wharf just before Green Bridge in the centre of Stafford. THE LOCK The correct name is St.Thomas’ Lock or Baswich Lock.
    [Show full text]
  • North Housing Market Area Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Needs Assessment
    North Housing Market Area Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Needs Assessment Final report Philip Brown and Lisa Hunt Salford Housing & Urban Studies Unit University of Salford Pat Niner Centre for Urban and Regional Studies University of Birmingham December 2007 2 About the Authors Philip Brown and Lisa Hunt are Research Fellows in the Salford Housing & Urban Studies Unit (SHUSU) at the University of Salford. Pat Niner is a Senior Lecturer in the Centre for Urban and Regional Studies (CURS) at the University of Birmingham The Salford Housing & Urban Studies Unit is a dedicated multi-disciplinary research and consultancy unit providing a range of services relating to housing and urban management to public and private sector clients. The Unit brings together researchers drawn from a range of disciplines including: social policy, housing management, urban geography, environmental management, psychology, social care and social work. Study Team Core team members: Community Interviewers: Dr Philip Brown Sharon Finney Dr Lisa Hunt Tracey Finney Pat Niner Violet Frost Jenna Condie Joe Hurn Ann Smith Steering Group Karen Bates Staffordshire Moorlands District Council Abid Razaq Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council Philip Somerfield East Staffordshire Borough Council Eleanor Taylor Stoke-on-Trent City Council Stephen Ward Stafford Borough Council 3 4 Acknowledgements This study was greatly dependent upon the time, expertise and contributions of a number of individuals and organisations, without whom the study could not have been completed. Members of the project Steering Group provided guidance and assistance throughout the project and thanks must go to all of them for their support to the study team. Special thanks are also due to all those who took the time to participate in the study, helped organise the fieldwork and provided invaluable information and support in the production of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Volume 1 - Report June 2014
    South Staffordshire, Cannock Chase, Lichfield & Stafford Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Volume 1 - Report June 2014 Quality Management Job No CS069598 Title South Staffordshire, Cannock Chase, Lichfield & Stafford Level 1 SFRA Update Location South Staffordshire Council Document Ref N/A Issue / Revision Final (Version 2) Date 19th June 2014 Prepared by Jane Tingay Signature (for file) Checked by Louise Tattersall Signature (for file) Authorised by Steve Thompsett Signature (for file) Revision Status Rev Date Issue / Purpose/ Comment Prepared Checked Authorised Draft 28/02/2014 Issue draft for comment JT LT ST Final 30/04/2014 Final JT LT ST Final 19/06/2014 Final (Version 2) JT - ST This document and related appendices have been updated on behalf of South Staffordshire, Cannock Chase Council, Lichfield District Council & Stafford Borough Council by: Quays Office Park, Conference Avenue, Portishead, BS20 7LZ. Tel 01275 840 840 www.capita.co.uk Contents GLOSSARY ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 10 1.1 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................................... 10 1.2 SFRA AIMS .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]