Design of an LGU Implemented Comprehensive Fisheries Catch and Effort Monitoring Schemes by UPVFI APRIL 2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Design of an LGU Implemented Comprehensive Fisheries Catch and Effort Monitoring Schemes by UPVFI APRIL 2017 Harnessing Markets to Secure a Future for Near-shore Fishers Design of an LGU implemented comprehensive fisheries catch and effort monitoring schemes by UPVFI APRIL 2017 By Wilfredo L. Campos and Donna M. Guarte Design of an LGU implemented comprehensive fisheries ii Harnessing Markets to Secure a Future for Near-shore Fishers Design of an LGU implemented comprehensive fisheries Acknowledgment This report is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this report are the responsibility of the authors do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. Harnessing Markets to Secure a Future for Near-shore Fishers iii Design of an LGU implemented comprehensive fisheries Contents 01 Introduction 01 Fisheries Profiling 01 A. Elements and objectives of a fisheries profile 01 B. Preparation for conducting a fisheries profile 03 C. Conducting a fisheries profile 05 D. Processing information from a fisheries profile and their relevance to management 09 Design of the Actual Monitoring Scheme for the Rapid Assessment of Target Resources at Rare Project Sites 14 Harvest Control Reference Points and Related Information 22 References 22 Appendix 1. Types of Fishing Gears 26 Appendix 2. Common Problems And Concerns Raised During The Focused Group Discussion iv Harnessing Markets to Secure a Future for Near-shore Fishers Design of an LGU implemented comprehensive fisheries Design of an LGU implemented comprehensive fisheries catch and effort monitoring schemes by UPVFI By Wilfredo L. Campos and Donna M. Guarte Harnessing Markets to Secure a Future for Near-shore Fishers v Design of an LGU implemented comprehensive fisheries INTRODUCTION catch per fisher per trip or per day Municipal local government units are mandated to • Fishing area –specific locations where fishers manage fisheries within their coastal waters. More frequently fish (used in spatial distribution of needs to be done in this regard, especially because effort) relatively little has been gained since the enactment of • Catch composition – listing of catch by gear type the Fisheries Code 18 years ago. The principal obstacle and information on the dominant catch for each to this is the lack of even the most basic information gear type and their seasonality on catch and fishing effort. Until recently, most efforts Other information – such as issues, problems and towards this end have focused on monitoring catches concerns in the fishery; trends in fisheries. and estimating production. In recent years, the BFAR initiated efforts to register fishers, vessels and gear in all II.B. Preparations for conducting a fisheries coastal municipalities nationwide. These data, however, profile need to be “matched “with their respective catches to 1. Compilation of available information. The team provide more insights into management. By design, should compile and familiarize themselves with these efforts need to be complemented by monitoring available background information about the area – how, when and where fishers operate (i.e. effort), and number of coastal barangays, number of fishers, fishing what they catch. This document presents the design gears used, commonly caught species, map of the area and operationalization of a low-cost LGU-implemented and previous studies concerning their fisheries. These fisheries catch and effort monitoring system which information will be helpful in conducting the FGD, complements gear and fisher registration efforts, and especially when participants are not willing to answer more importantly, provides LGUs with the information the questions seriously. This is typical of the first few they need to effectively manage their fisheries. In minutes of an FGD. A team is usually composed of addition, the scheme can be readily modified to include 3 members – a discussion leader, a documenter who sampling for more detailed biological studies focused posts information on the board and assists in fielding/ on specific resources or species. clarifying questions, and a notekeeper who jots down notes, especially those on clarifications, and photos FISHERIES PROFILING (Fig. 1). In areas where fisheries information is nil and or unavailable, fisheries profiling through focused group discussions (FGD) may serve as the main source of information. An advantage in holding such discussions is that it is inexpensive and more detailed information can be gathered and some verification is allowed through active discussion with and among the participants (Campos & Castillo, 2007). The ideal participants in fisheries profiling are fishers, wives of fishers and fish buyers from both sectors (municipal and commercial), fisheries officers, bantay dagat officers, BFARMC and MFARMC officials. II.A. Elements and objective of a fisheries Figure 1. Example of focused group discussion (FGD) profile (Batangas) A fisheries profile is an initial characterization of a fishery in a locality with the main objective of gathering basic information that are needed to manage natural 2. Identification of coastal barangays to be involved marine resources. The basic information that can be in the FGD. Ideally, all coastal barangays should be gathered in a fisheries profile are: included, but when the number of barangays is more • Fishing gear types – enumeration of the different than 10, priority barangays should be identified based gear types used with a corresponding description on fisher density and recommendations from the of its operation. Appendix 1 shows some common Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Management Council gear types. (FARMC) and the LGU. Or a series of FGDs (2-3 • Fishing effort – typically expressed as number of sessions) may be conducted to cover all barangays. gear units, number of fishers, number of fishing This, however, will depend on the resources (material days or months per year (fishing calendar), number and time) available to the team. of fishers per trip and fishing hours per trip Catch rate – usually expressed as catch per fishing 3. Preparing the list of participants. The ideal trip or fishing operation; commonly presented as participants include fishers, their wives, and fish buyers/ 1 Harnessing Markets to Secure a Future for Near-shore Fishers Design of an LGU implemented comprehensive fisheries vendors/dealers from both sectors (municipal and commercial), fisheries officers/LGU, bantay dagat officers, BFARMC and MFARMC officials. At the minimum, representatives of a barangay should be familiar with the different gear types used by residents of the barangay, including their operations, catch rates, composition and an idea of how many fishers there Figure 2. Example of gear inventory matrix format used in focused group discussions are in the barangay. Barangay officials would usually be familiar with the latter. The minimum number of participants per coastal barangay is 3 and the maximum is 5. Too many participants will be difficult to handle during the FGD. 4. Coordination with the LGU and MAO. Ideally, a letter addressed to the mayor is sent at least a few weeks Figure 3. Example of catch matrix format used in focused group discussion prior to the FGD. The letter should explain the aims and outputs of the activity and how these may be used in the management of their fishery. The letter should be explicit also in requesting the kind of assistance the team will need from them, such as securing of the venue (open or closed space is okay) and informing/ inviting participants to the FGD. 5. Preparation of materials needed. • gear inventory matrix – this will eventually contain a list of the names of gear types used in the barangays involved ( manila paper or a board may be used if available) • catch matrix containing the basic catch and effort information written on a sheet of manila paper ( a board may be used if available). • sketch of the municipal map (Fig. 4) on a sheet of manila paper showing islands, islets, shoal areas, Figure 4. Example of a rough sketch of as well as isobaths, approximate municipal water a municipal map used in focused group boundaries, coastal barangays and other notable discussions landmarks. • colored pens or crayons for marking the areas where the different gear types operate • reference books to validate the equivalent English the information being listed in the gear inventory name of fishing gears (drawings of the gear and matrix how it is operated are also very helpful) and • Can someone illustrate and describe the nature family/scientific names of the commonly caught of operation of each gear type? species Involve as many participants as possible to keep • sound system (if available) them immersed and to make them feel needed and • camera for photo-documentation (if available) important. This also allows clarifying the various ways the gear has been modified. 6. Guide questions. Structured questions should be • How many units of each gear type do you have prepared to ensure that all needed information will in your barangay? be gathered at the end of the FGD. Basically, these This should be asked and noted down by barangay guide questions constitute the information in the catch • How many fishers are using each gear type in matrix. Also, prepared questions will guide the flow of your barangay? the discussion. The following are examples of the guide This should be done by barangay questions: • How many fishers are involved per operation in • What are the fishing gear types used in your each gear type? barangay? This is usually a range of values and it is also with If participants are from 5 coastal barangays, each this question that modifications to gear types are barangay should be asked one after the other, with revealed. Harnessing Markets to Secure a Future for Near-shore Fishers 2 Design of an LGU implemented comprehensive fisheries • How long (no. of hours) is the fishing operation of fisheries data gathering. The major expenses are as of each gear type? follows: This is usually a range of values that will likely • materials (as listed above) differ between seasons.
Recommended publications
  • Kansas Fishing Regulations Summary
    2 Kansas Fishing 0 Regulations 0 5 Summary The new Community Fisheries Assistance Program (CFAP) promises to increase opportunities for anglers to fish close to home. For detailed information, see Page 16. PURCHASE FISHING LICENSES AND VIEW WEEKLY FISHING REPORTS ONLINE AT THE DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE AND PARKS' WEBSITE, WWW.KDWP.STATE.KS.US TABLE OF CONTENTS Wildlife and Parks Offices, e-mail . Zebra Mussel, White Perch Alerts . State Record Fish . Lawful Fishing . Reservoirs, Lakes, and River Access . Are Fish Safe To Eat? . Definitions . Fish Identification . Urban Fishing, Trout, Fishing Clinics . License Information and Fees . Special Event Permits, Boats . FISH Access . Length and Creel Limits . Community Fisheries Assistance . Becoming An Outdoors-Woman (BOW) . Common Concerns, Missouri River Rules . Master Angler Award . State Park Fees . WILDLIFE & PARKS OFFICES KANSAS WILDLIFE & Maps and area brochures are available through offices listed on this page and from the PARKS COMMISSION department website, www.kdwp.state.ks.us. As a cabinet-level agency, the Kansas Office of the Secretary AREA & STATE PARK OFFICES Department of Wildlife and Parks is adminis- 1020 S Kansas Ave., Rm 200 tered by a secretary of Wildlife and Parks Topeka, KS 66612-1327.....(785) 296-2281 Cedar Bluff SP....................(785) 726-3212 and is advised by a seven-member Wildlife Cheney SP .........................(316) 542-3664 and Parks Commission. All positions are Pratt Operations Office Cheyenne Bottoms WA ......(620) 793-7730 appointed by the governor with the commis- 512 SE 25th Ave. Clinton SP ..........................(785) 842-8562 sioners serving staggered four-year terms. Pratt, KS 67124-8174 ........(620) 672-5911 Council Grove WA..............(620) 767-5900 Serving as a regulatory body for the depart- Crawford SP .......................(620) 362-3671 ment, the commission is a non-partisan Region 1 Office Cross Timbers SP ..............(620) 637-2213 board, made up of no more than four mem- 1426 Hwy 183 Alt., P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • POND FISH and FISHING in ILLINOIS by A.C
    POND FISH AND FISHING IN ILLINOIS by A.C. LOPI NOT CHIEF FISHERY BIOLOGIST Fishery Bulletin Number 5 Illinois Department of Conservation Division of Fisheries Springfield, Illinois 62706 1967 Page Acknowledgements 2 Introduction .......................................................................................5 THE POND ITSELF 7 The Water . 9 The Food Chain 10 FISH FOR THE FISHING POND 11 Largemouth bass 11 Bluegill 13 Redear sunfish 15 Channel catfish 16 FISH THAT CAN RUIN FISHING 17 Crappie .....................................................17 Bullheads ................................................................................18 Carp — Buffalo — Suckers 18 Green sunfish ...........................................................19 Other fish ............................................................................ 19 STOCKING THE POND ......................................................20 WHEN AND HOW TO FISH THE POND 22 CATCHING FISH 24 Largemouth bass 24 Bluegill ........................................................................... 25 Redear sunfish 25 Channel catfish 25 MANAGING THE POND 28 Aquatic Weed Control .............................................................29 Harvesting and Controlling Bluegills 31 Destroying Spawning Beds 33 Water Level Fluctuations 33 Brush Removal ........................................33 Fertilization ......................................................................... 33 CONTENTS Testing a Pond's Fish Population 34 How to Determine the Condition of a Fish Population
    [Show full text]
  • Fuad, Baskoro M. S., Riyanto M., Mawardi W., 2019 Catch Characteristics on Stationary Lift Net Using Light Emitting Diode (LED) and Kerosene Lights in Pasuruan Waters
    Catch characteristics on stationary lift net using light emitting diode (LED) and kerosene lights in Pasuruan waters 1Fuad, 2Mulyono S. Baskoro, 2Mochammad Riyanto, 2Wazir Mawardi 1 Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia; 2 Marine Fisheries Technology, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, Bogor Agricultural University, West Java, Indonesia. Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract. Light in stationary lift nets (SLN) is important to the extent that it can determine the composition of species, size and number of fish caught. Different types of light are often used in aggregating certain types of fish. This study aims to find the best type of light for SLN and to determine the characteristics of the catch between light emitting diode (LED) and kerosene lights. The results showed that there were no significant differences in species composition of fish caught in both LED and kerosene lights. These types of lights do not affect the composition of fish species, but have a significant effect on the amount of catch. The most caught fish (target species) were short mackerel (Rastrelliger brachysoma) and yellowstripe scad (Selaroides leptolepis). The SLN operated with kerosene lights caught short mackerel (R. brachysoma) and yellowstripe scad (S. leptolepis) of bigger size compared to SLN with LED lights. The average length and weight of short mackerel caught with kerosene lights were 146.3 mm and 37.17 grams, respectively. The average length and weight of yellowstripe scad (S. leptolepis) caught with kerosene lights were 117.04 mm and 21.5 grams, respectively. However, only a small portion of catch, 4.5%, had already reached its mature size (Lm), while the rest of the catch (95.5%) had not reached its mature size.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Methods and Gears in Panay Island, Philippines
    Fishing Methods and Gears in Panay Island, Philippines 著者 KAWAMURA Gunzo, BAGARINAO Teodora journal or 鹿児島大学水産学部紀要=Memoirs of Faculty of publication title Fisheries Kagoshima University volume 29 page range 81-121 別言語のタイトル フィリピン, パナイ島の漁具漁法 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10232/13182 Mem. Fac. Fish., Kagoshima Univ. Vol.29 pp. 81-121 (1980) Fishing Methods and Gears in Panay Island, Philippines*1 Gunzo Kawamura*2 and Teodora Bagarinao*3 Abstract The authors surveyed the fishing methods and gears in Panay and smaller neighboring islands in the Philippines in September-December 1979 and in March-May 1980. This paper is a report on the fishing methods and gears used in these islands, with special focus on the traditional and primitive ones. The term "fishing" is commonly used to mean the capture of many aquatic animals — fishes, crustaceans, mollusks, coelenterates, echinoderms, sponges, and even birds and mammals. Moreover, the harvesting of algae underwater or from the intertidal zone is often an important job for the fishermen. Fishing method is the manner by which the aquatic organisms are captured or collected; fishing gear is the implement developed for the purpose. Oftentimes, the gear alone is not sufficient and auxiliary instruments have to be used to realize a method. A fishing method can be applied by means of various gears, just as a fishing gear can sometimes be used in the appli cation of several methods. Commonly, only commercial fishing is covered in fisheries reports. Although traditional and primitive fishing is done on a small scale, it is still very important from the viewpoint of supply of animal protein.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Traps on Ancient Shores
    UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations 1-1-2007 Fish traps on ancient shores Eric Stephen White University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/rtds Repository Citation White, Eric Stephen, "Fish traps on ancient shores" (2007). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 2197. http://dx.doi.org/10.25669/7v2b-4kwu This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FISH TRAPS ON ANCIENT SHORES By Eric Stephen White Master of Arts University of Nevada Las Vegas 2007 A Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts Degree in Anthropology Department of Anthropology and Ethnic Studies College of Liberal Arts Graduate College University of Nevada, Las Vegas August 2007 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 1448429 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Gip Beneficiaries
    Department of Labor and Employment Regional Office No. 5 Legazpi City 2016 GIP BENEFICIARIES Beneficiary Name Employer Name City Province ABAC JR, ARTEMIO CASTILLON LGU-NAGA CITY Naga City Camarines Sur ABAC, JUBERT ALABAN LGU-PAMPLONA, CAMARINES SUR Pamplona Camarines Sur ABAD, ARGEN GONZAGA 4TH DISTRICT Sagñay Camarines Sur ABAD, LON MEYANNE MONSALVE DOLE5-ALBAY FIELD OFFICE Legazpi City Albay ABAGAT, ARLYNE LGU-NABUA Nabua Camarines Sur ABALLA, KAREN LUZENTALES LGU-SIPOCOT Sipocot Camarines Sur ABALLA, KRIS LUZENTALES LGU-SIPOCOT Sipocot Camarines Sur ABAN, MICHAEL MESA BRGY. POBLACION, AROROY MASBATE Aroroy Masbate ABANES, MA. SHEENA EBORDE LGU-SIPOCOT Sipocot Camarines Sur ABAÑO, JOHN MARK BOLANTE LGU-SAN FERNANDO, MASBATE Masbate City Albay ABANTE, LEA LYN MARAYA LGU-DEL GALLEGO Del Gallego Camarines Sur ABAO, ANALYN RUSTIA LGU-PLACER MASBATE Placer Masbate ABARIENTOS, ALVIN DEL CASTILLO LGU-CABUSAO Cabusao Camarines Sur ABARIENTOS, JOAN FRANCE SANCHEZ LGU-LIBMANAN CAMARINES SUR Libmanan Camarines Sur ABAS, JENNIFER T LGU-USON Uson Masbate ABAS, LYRA NOPAT PGO-MASBATE Mobo Masbate ABASOLA, JOASH CHRISTIAN B LGU-LIBMANAN CAMARINES SUR Libmanan Camarines Sur ABAYON, FLORA MAY ROMERO MASBATE *2016 Balud Masbate ABAYON, JOAN GARCIA LGU-SAN FERNANDO, MASBATE San Fernando Masbate ABAYON, JOY PALMONES LGU-PAMPLONA, CAMARINES SUR Pamplona Camarines Sur ABAYON, MARY CRIS ROMERO MASBATE *2016 Balud Masbate ABAYON, PAUL JOHN ELACION LGU-SAN FERNANDO, MASBATE Masbate City Masbate ABEJERO, ARJAY AMITH LGU-NAGA CITY Naga City Camarines Sur ABEJUELA, FREDIE PEREZ BLGU-PEÑAFRANCIA, SORSOGON CITY Palanas Masbate ABEJUELA, JEANLY CONEL LGU-PIO V. CORPUZ Pio V. Corpuz Masbate ABEJUELA, LEANNE FAYE BRAVO LGU-PIO V.
    [Show full text]
  • 2D Seismic Survey in Block AD- 10, Offshore Myanmar
    2D Seismic Survey in Block AD- 10, Offshore Myanmar Initial Environmental Examination 02 December 2015 Environmental Resources Management www.erm.com The world’s leading sustainability consultancy 2D Seismic Survey in Block AD-10, Environmental Resources Management Offshore Myanmar ERM-Hong Kong, Limited 16/F, Berkshire House 25 Westlands Road Initial Environmental Examination Quarry Bay Hong Kong Telephone: (852) 2271 3000 Facsimile: (852) 2723 5660 Document Code: 0267094_IEE_Cover_AD10_EN.docx http://www.erm.com Client: Project No: Statoil Myanmar Private Limited 0267094 Summary: Date: 02 December 2015 Approved by: This document presents the Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) for 2D Seismic Survey in Block AD-10, as required under current Draft Environmental Impact Assessment Procedures Craig A. Reid Partner 1 Addressing MOECAF Comments, Final for MOGE RS CAR CAR 02/12/2015 0 Draft Final RS JNG CAR 31/08/2015 Revision Description By Checked Approved Date Distribution Internal Public Confidential CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1-1 1.1 PURPOSE AND EXTENT OF THE IEE REPORT 1-1 1.2 SUMMARY OF THE ACTIVITIES UNDERTAKEN DURING THE IEE STUDY 1-2 1.3 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES 1-2 1.4 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT TO BE AFFECTED BY THE PROJECT 1-4 1.5 SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1-5 1.6 THE PUBLIC CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION PROCESS 1-6 1.7 SUMMARY OF THE EMP 1-7 1.8 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE IEE REPORT 1-8 2 INTRODUCTION 2-1 2.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW 2-1 2.2 PROJECT PROPONENT 2-1 2.3 THIS INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (IEE)
    [Show full text]
  • Tuna Fishing and a Review of Payaos in the Philippines
    Session 1 - Regional syntheses Tuna fishing and a review of payaos in the Philippines Jonathan O. Dickson*1', Augusto C. Nativiclacl(2) (1) Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources, 860 Arcadia Bldg., Quezon Avenue, Quezon City 3008, Philippines - [email protected] (2) Frabelle Fishing Company, 1051 North Bay Blvd., Navotas, Metro Manila, Philippines Abstract Payao is a traditional concept, which has been successfully commercialized to increase the landings of several species valuable to the country's export and local industries. It has become one of the most important developments in pelagic fishing that significantly contributed to increased tuna production and expansion of purse seine and other fishing gears. The introduction of the payao in tuna fishing in 1975 triggered the rapid development of the tuna and small pelagic fishery. With limited management schemes and strategies, however, unstable tuna and tuna-like species production was experienced in the 1980s and 1990s. In this paper, the evolution and development of the payao with emphasis on the technological aspect are reviewed. The present practices and techniques of payao in various parts of the country, including its structure, ownership, distribution, and fishing operations are discussed. Monitoring results of purse seine/ringnet operations including handline using payao in Celebes Sea and Western Luzon are presented to compare fishing styles and techniques, payao designs and species caught. The fishing gears in various regions of the country for harvesting payao are enumerated and discussed. The inshore and offshore payaos in terms of sea depth, location, designs, fishing methods and catch composi- tion are also compared. Fishing companies and fisherfolk associations involved in payao operation are presented to determine extent of uti- lization and involvement in the municipal and commercial sectors of the fishing industry.
    [Show full text]
  • RI Marine Fisheries Statutes and Regulations
    Summary of Changes 8.1.9(I) Lobster and Cancer Crab pots: (A1) Maximum size: 22,950 cubic inches. (B2) Escape vents: Each and every lobster and Cancer crab pot, set, kept, or maintained or caused to be set, kept, or maintained in any of the waters in the jurisdiction of this State by any person properly licensed, shall contain an escape vent in accordance with the following specifications: (20-7-11(a)) (gvii) Lobster and Cancer crab traps not constructed entirely of wood must contain a ghost panel with the following specifications: 8.1.13(M) Commercial lobster trap tags: (A1) No person shall have on board a vessel or set, deploy, place, keep, maintain, lift, or raise; from, in, or upon the waters under the jurisdiction of the State of Rhode Island any lobster pot for taking of American lobster or Cancer crab without the pot having a valid State of Rhode Island lobster trap tag. (LN) For persons possessing a valid RI commercial fishing license (licensee) for the catching, taking, or landing of American lobster or Cancer Crab, and who also own or are incorporated/partnered in a vessel(s) holding a Federal Limited Access Lobster Permit (Federal Lobster Permit), the following shall apply: (1) No harvesting of lobsters or Cancer Crab may occur in any LCMA by means of any lobster trap for which a trap tag has not been issued. All vessels owned/incorporated/partnered by said licensee which hold a Federal Lobster Permit shall annually declare all LCMA(s) in which the licensee intends to fish during the fishery year.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of “Ghost Fishing“ Via Derelict Fishing Gear
    2015 NOAA Marine Debris Program Report Impact of “Ghost Fishing“ via Derelict Fishing Gear 2015 MARINE DEBRIS GHOST FISHING REPORT March 2015 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science – Center for Coastal Environmental Health and Biomolecular Research 219 Ft. Johnson Rd. Charleston, South Carolina 29412 Office of Response and Restoration NOAA Marine Debris Program 1305 East-West Hwy, SSMC4, Room 10239 Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 Cover photo courtesy of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration For citation purposes, please use: NOAA Marine Debris Program. 2015 Report on the impacts of “ghost fishing” via derelict fishing gear. Silver Spring, MD. 25 pp For more information, please contact: NOAA Marine Debris Program Office of Response and Restoration National Ocean Service 1305 East West Highway Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 301-713-2989 Acknowledgements The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Marine Debris Program would like to acknowledge Jennifer Maucher Fuquay (NOAA National Ocean Service, National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science) for conducting this research, and Courtney Arthur (NOAA National Ocean Service, Marine Debris Program) and Jason Paul Landrum (NOAA National Ocean Service, Marine Debris Program) for providing guidance and support throughout this process. Special thanks go to Ariana Sutton-Grier (NOAA National Ocean Science) and Peter Murphy (NOAA National Ocean Service, Marine Debris Program) for reviewing this paper and providing helpful comments. Special thanks also go to John Hayes (NOAA National Ocean Service, National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science) and Dianna Parker (NOAA National Ocean Science, Marine Debris Program) for a copy/edit review of this report and Leah L.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Fishing Guide |
    Texas Commercial Fishing regulations summary 2021 2022 SEPTEMBER 1, 2021 – AUGUST 31, 2022 Subject to updates by Texas Legislature or Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission TEXAS COMMERCIAL FISHING REGULATIONS SUMMARY This publication is a summary of current regulations that govern commercial fishing, meaning any activity involving taking or handling fresh or saltwater aquatic products for pay or for barter, sale or exchange. Recreational fishing regulations can be found at OutdoorAnnual.com or on the mobile app (download available at OutdoorAnnual.com). LIMITED-ENTRY AND BUYBACK PROGRAMS .......................................................................... 3 COMMERCIAL FISHERMAN LICENSE TYPES ........................................................................... 3 COMMERCIAL FISHING BOAT LICENSE TYPES ........................................................................ 6 BAIT DEALER LICENSE TYPES LICENCIAS PARA VENDER CARNADA .................................................................................... 7 WHOLESALE, RETAIL AND OTHER BUSINESS LICENSES AND PERMITS LICENCIAS Y PERMISOS COMERCIALES PARA NEGOCIOS MAYORISTAS Y MINORISTAS .......... 8 NONGAME FRESHWATER FISH (PERMIT) PERMISO PARA PESCADOS NO DEPORTIVOS EN AGUA DULCE ................................................ 12 BUYING AND SELLING AQUATIC PRODUCTS TAKEN FROM PUBLIC WATERS ............................. 13 FRESHWATER FISH ................................................................................................... 13 SALTWATER FISH .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Classification of Fishing Gear in the Philippines
    U.S. Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Wildlife Services Historic document – Content may not reflect current scientific research, policies or practices. GUIDE TO THE CLASSIFICATION OF FISHING GEAR IN THE PHILIPPINES By AGUSTIN F. UMALI, Ichthyologist Illustrations by Silas G. Duran RESEARCH REPORT 17 Fish and Wildlife Service, Albert M. Day, Director United States Department of the Interior, Oscar L. Chapman, Secretary UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 1950 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, United States Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price 40 cents ABSTRACT One of the serious handicaps in the administration and manage­ ment of the fisheries of the Philippines has been the lack of standardized nomenclature for fishing gear. This publication attempts to solve the problem. It is divided into five parts: The first presents a basic clas­ sification of fishing gear; the second is a key by means of which fishing gear can be identified and new terms for fishing gear can be properly classified; the third defines and illustrates various types of fishing gear; the fourth is a tabular classification of local Filipino di­ alect names; and the fifth is a glossary including definitions of more than a thousand terms. CONTENTS Classification of the Gear. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2 Part I. Basic Classification of Fishing Gear. • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • 6 Part II. Key to the Identification of Classes of Fishing Gear. • . •
    [Show full text]