DOCSLIB.ORG

Carcharhinus Galapagensis) at Local, Regional and Oceanic Scales

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ResearchOnline@JCU This file is part of the following reference: Pazmiño Jaramillo, Diana Alexandra (2017) Population genomics informs conservation and management of the Galapagos shark (Carcharhinus galapagensis) at local, regional and oceanic scales. PhD thesis, James Cook University. Access to this file is available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4225/28/58c750da105d4 The author has certified to JCU that they have made a reasonable effort to gain permission and acknowledge the owner of any third party copyright material included in this document. If you believe that this is not the case, please contact [email protected] TITLE Population genomics informs conservation and management of the Galapagos shark (Carcharhinus galapagensis) at local, regional and oceanic scales Thesis submitted by Diana Alexandra Pazmiño Jaramillo, (BSc. Biological Sciences) in July 2017 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Marine Sciences College of Science and Engineering James Cook University, Townsville, Australia Statement of contribution of others Funding of PhD • Ecuador National Secretariat of Higher Education, Science, Technology and Innovation (SENESCYT) doctoral scholarship. • EcoCiencia research grant. Funding of laboratory work • School of Science and Engineering funds • Ecuador National Secretariat of Higher Education, Science, Technology and Innovation (SENESCYT) doctoral scholarship. Supervision • Dr. Lynne van Herwerden, School of Science and Engineering, James Cook University • Prof. Colin Simpfendorferr, School of Science and Engineering, James Cook University • Dr. Gregory Maes, Laboratory of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Genomics, University of Leuven. • Dr. Pelayo Salinas de León, Department of Marine Sciences, Charles Darwin Research Station. Statistical Support • Eike Steinig • Monal Lal • Madeline Green Volunteers • Diego Ortiz, Manuel Pazmiño, Eduardo Espinosa, Fernando Córdova, Luis Roberto Nieto,William Buenaño, Cecilio Tomalá, María Córdova, and other fishermen and field assistants who generously cooperated with us during sample collection. Proofreading • Diego Ortiz • Natalia Andrade II Acknowledgements Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisory panel, which were very supportive and helpful in every possible way during these four years. A special thank to Lynne van Herwerden, an incredible primary supervisor, colleague, friend, and human being. Lynne had nothing but kind words and a positive attitude towards her students every single time. From the bottom of my heart, thanks Lynne for making me forget that I am so far away from home, for guiding and teaching me (by example) how to become a good scientist and a better person every day. I would like to express my profound gratitude to Dr. Gregory Maes, my co- supervisor and friend, for being there every time I (desperately) needed. Greg would have the patience and energy to explain the most complicated problem with the simplest words to help me understand. Thanks Greg for the long skype meetings and every advice that would help me set up my current and future goals as a scientist, and thanks for being so enthusiastic about shark science. Thanks to Professor Colin Simpfendorfer for being a very patient and efficient co-supervisor, for all his guidance and for reminding me to keep a broad perspective about my work. Thanks to Dr. Pelayo Salinas de León, my external supervisor and my base in the Galápagos Islands, for all his valuable input and suggestions throughout my PhD. I consider myself fortunate to have been part of such wonderful team, always ready to step up and provide the advice and help needed. Funding for this research was provided by the National Secretariat of Higher Education, Science, Technology and Innovation of Ecuador (SENESCYT) through a Higher Education scholarship awarded from 2013-2017. Additional funding was provided by EcoCiencia through a small research EcoFondo grant. I would like to express my deepest gratitude to all the funding bodies that made this work possible. Thanks to the Galápagos National Park for their logistic support in the field and for providing the permits to collect and export tissue samples. Thanks to James Cook University and the Molecular Ecology and Evolutionary Laboratory (MEEL) for providing me an excellent environment and the opportunity to meet incredible people. A special thank to all the collaborators from around the world, Madeline Green, Dr. Carl Meyer, Dr. Sven Kerwath, Dr. Mauricio Hoyos-Padilla, Dr. Clinton Duffy, Dr. Stephen Donnellan, Dr. Claudia Junge, Dr. Charlie Huveneers, and Dr. Bronwyn Gillanders who shared valuable tissue samples and suggestions along the way, and made it possible to achieve such comprehensive and important results. III Acknowledgements My deepest, sincere love and gratitude to Diego Ortiz, for encouraging me to pursue my dreams, and for being part of this incredible journey. We have learned and grown up together sharing successes and frustrations. Thank you for inspiring me to be passionate about science, for listening at the end of the day, and for being the person I can always rely on. A big thank to those who suffered from all the complaints, that celebrated every little step forward on this journey, and had the right words on every situation, good or bad: Natalia Andrade and Dr. Chao-Yang Kuo. You guys are the best PhD mates, and friends I could ever had, and will forever have a special place in my heart. I can’t imagine how much harder this might have been without all of you. I would like to thank also Eike Steinig and Maximilian Hirschfeld, for their constant support during the data analysis and map drawing, they would have a constant smile and bring joy to the most stressful situations. Thanks to my Townsville family: Cesar Herrera, Alejandra Hernandez, Sandra Infante, Maria Nayfa, Nicolás Younes, Estefanía Erazo, Rose Basiita, Roger Huerlimann, Heather Loxton, Blanche D’Anastas, Omar Ramirez, and to all the friends and colleagues who shared this experience with me. We cried, we laugh, we got excited about the free barbeques, we spent long nights awake checking the news from home (wherever that is for each one of us), we shared the good and the bad news, we spent long days in the laboratory, but more importantly we were there for one another. Being surrounded by loving, caring people like you kept me sane and motivated every day to keep going. Lastly, thanks to my family for their endless love and support. This thesis is dedicated to you. To my father Manuel Pazmiño who introduced me to the marine world, for supporting and sharing my passion for nature. For being the best field assistant I could have asked for, and my biggest fan in every step of my life. To my mother, Teresa Jaramillo, for being my role model and the woman to look up to every day, for being strong for all of us, for teaching me how to be good and pushing me to be better. Thank you for believing in me. Thanks to my brother, Andrés Pazmiño, no matter what we say, no matter where we are, we simply know we can count on each other, thanks for being there for me. IV Abstract Abstract Elasmobranchs (sharks and rays) have increasingly experienced human pressures over recent decades, ranging from overfishing to habitat loss. Addressing these pressures is the main challenge for elasmobranch conservation. Specific life-history traits (including slow growth, late maturation, long gestation periods, and small litters) have resulted in high susceptibility to excessive mortality, and have limited their recovery ability. A better understanding of aspects of their biology, population connectivity, habitat use, adaptation and demographic patterns is an important step towards improved management and conservation of elasmobranchs. Yet there is insufficient information to understand the status of almost 50% of elasmobranch species, according to the IUCN Red List of Threatened species. The advent of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies has seen a transition from conservation genetics to genomics (from gene to genome scales), which is informing our understanding of species and improving conservation outcomes based on these insights. This technology has provided access to thousands of genome-wide markers, collectively capable of providing reliable inferences about demographic patterns and enabling detection of local adaptation. Developing and applying genomics tools to investigate elasmobranch biology and ecology is therefore an important step towards improving their management and conservation. This thesis focuses on the Galapagos shark (Carcharhinus galapagensis), a species categorized as “Near Threatened” by the IUCN in 2003, with a circumtropical distribution and a preference for isolated oceanic islands in tropical and warm temperate waters. Importantly, information about population structure and connectivity across most of the species’ geographic range is lacking, and current knowledge of habitat use and population structure is limited to specific areas. Hence, C. galapagensis is a good elasmobranch case study to apply comprehensive genomics tools to detect stock structure, inter-population connectivity, intra- population self-replenishment and to estimate effective population sizes. Informed by these measures, population status at different geographic scales can be used to prioritize populations V Abstract in need of improved management. Galapagos sharks also co-occur with a closely related carcharhinid, Carcharhinus obscurus in parts of their respective distribution ranges.
Recommended publications
  • Extinction Risk and Conservation of the World's Sharks and Rays

    Extinction Risk and Conservation of the World's Sharks and Rays

    RESEARCH ARTICLE elife.elifesciences.org Extinction risk and conservation of the world’s sharks and rays Nicholas K Dulvy1,2*, Sarah L Fowler3, John A Musick4, Rachel D Cavanagh5, Peter M Kyne6, Lucy R Harrison1,2, John K Carlson7, Lindsay NK Davidson1,2, Sonja V Fordham8, Malcolm P Francis9, Caroline M Pollock10, Colin A Simpfendorfer11,12, George H Burgess13, Kent E Carpenter14,15, Leonard JV Compagno16, David A Ebert17, Claudine Gibson3, Michelle R Heupel18, Suzanne R Livingstone19, Jonnell C Sanciangco14,15, John D Stevens20, Sarah Valenti3, William T White20 1IUCN Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada; 2Earth to Ocean Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada; 3IUCN Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, NatureBureau International, Newbury, United Kingdom; 4Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, Gloucester Point, United States; 5British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, United Kingdom; 6Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia; 7Southeast Fisheries Science Center, NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service, Panama City, United States; 8Shark Advocates International, The Ocean Foundation, Washington, DC, United States; 9National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New Zealand; 10Global Species Programme, International Union for the Conservation
  • Status and Demographic Analysis of the Dusky Shark, Carcharhinus Obscurus, in the Northwest Atlantic

    Status and Demographic Analysis of the Dusky Shark, Carcharhinus Obscurus, in the Northwest Atlantic

    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2004 Status and Demographic Analysis of the Dusky Shark, Carcharhinus obscurus, in the Northwest Atlantic Jason G. Romine College of William and Mary - Virginia Institute of Marine Science Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Biostatistics Commons, Fresh Water Studies Commons, and the Oceanography Commons Recommended Citation Romine, Jason G., "Status and Demographic Analysis of the Dusky Shark, Carcharhinus obscurus, in the Northwest Atlantic" (2004). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539617821. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.25773/v5-zm7f-h314 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Status and demographic analysis of the Dusky shark, Carcharhinus obscurus, in the Northwest Atlantic A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the School of Marine Science The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science by Jason G. Romine 2004 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of The requirements for the degree of Master of Science Jason G. KOmine Approved, August 2004 NloW A. Musick, Ph.D. Committee Chairman/Advisor Kim N. Holland, Ph.D Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology University of Hawaii Kaneohe, Hawaii onn E. Olney, Ph.D. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS........................................................................................................ v LIST OF TABLES........................................................................................................................vi LIST OF FIGURES...................................................................................................................
  • Field Guide to Requiem Sharks (Elasmobranchiomorphi: Carcharhinidae) of the Western North Atlantic

    Field Guide to Requiem Sharks (Elasmobranchiomorphi: Carcharhinidae) of the Western North Atlantic

    Field guide to requiem sharks (Elasmobranchiomorphi: Carcharhinidae) of the Western North Atlantic Item Type monograph Authors Grace, Mark Publisher NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service Download date 24/09/2021 04:22:14 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/20307 NOAA Technical Report NMFS 153 U.S. Department A Scientific Paper of the FISHERY BULLETIN of Commerce August 2001 (revised November 2001) Field Guide to Requiem Sharks (Elasmobranchiomorphi: Carcharhinidae) of the Western North Atlantic Mark Grace NOAA Technical Report NMFS 153 A Scientific Paper of the Fishery Bulletin Field Guide to Requiem Sharks (Elasmobranchiomorphi: Carcharhinidae) of the Western North Atlantic Mark Grace August 2001 (revised November 2001) U.S. Department of Commerce Seattle, Washington Suggested reference Grace, Mark A. 2001. Field guide to requiem sharks (Elasmobranchiomorphi: Carcharhinidae) of the Western North Atlantic. U.S. Dep. Commer., NOAA Tech. Rep. NMFS 153, 32 p. Online dissemination This report is posted online in PDF format at http://spo.nwr.noaa.gov (click on Technical Reports link). Note on revision This report was revised and reprinted in November 2001 to correct several errors. Previous copies of the report, dated August 2001, should be destroyed as this revision replaces the earlier version. Purchasing additional copies Additional copies of this report are available for purchase in paper copy or microfiche from the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161; 1-800-553-NTIS; http://www.ntis.gov. Copyright law Although the contents of the Technical Reports have not been copyrighted and may be reprinted entirely, reference to source is appreciated.
  • White-Tip Reef Shark (Triaenodon Obesus) Michelle S

    White-Tip Reef Shark (Triaenodon Obesus) Michelle S

    White-tip Reef Shark (Triaenodon obesus) Michelle S. Tishler Common Name There are several common names for the Triaenodon obesus, which usually describes the “white tips” on their dorsal and caudal fins. Common names include: White-tip Reef Shark, Blunthead Shark, Light-Tip Shark and Reef Whitetip. Names in Spanish Cazón, Cazón Coralero Trompacorta and Tintorera Punta Aleta Blanca. Taxonomy Domain Eukarya Kingdom Anamalia Phylum Chordata Class Chondrichthyes Order Carcharhiniformes Family Carcharhinidae Genus Triaenodon Species obesus Nearest relatives Sharks are cartilaginous fishes in the class Chondrichthyes with skates, rays and other sharks. Within the family Carcharhinidae (requiem sharks), the White-tip Reef Shark is related to the Galapagos Shark, Bull Shark, Oceanic Whitetip, Tiger Shark and Blue Sharks. The White-tip Reef Shark does not share their genus name with any other organism. Island They are found amongst the reefs surrounding most or all of the Galapagos Islands. Geographic range White-tip Sharks range geographically from Costa Rica, Ecuador, Galapagos, Cocos, South Africa, Red Sea, Pakistan and etc. to primarily residing in the Indo-West Pacific region. (Red region indicates distribution of White-tip Reef Shark) Habitat Description As described in their name, White-tip Reef Sharks live amongst coral reefs with a home range of a couple square miles. They are also found in sandy patches and deeper waters. During the day these sharks tend to rest on the seabed or within caves and crevices. Physical description White-tip Reef sharks are named after the white tip on the dorsal (first and sometimes second) fins, and caudal fin lobes.
  • AC30 Doc. 20 A1

    AC30 Doc. 20 A1

    AC30 Doc. 20 Annex 1 (in the original language / dans la langue d’origine / en el idioma original) Responses to Notification to the Parties No 2018/041 Table of Contents Australia 2 China 14 Colombia 16 European Union 18 Indonesia 22 Mexico 52 New Zealand 56 Peru 59 Philippines 65 United States of America 67 Uruguay 116 Florida International University 121 The Pew Charitable Trusts 123 Wildlife Conservation Society 125 Notification 2018/041 Request for new information on shark and ray conservation and management activities, including legislation Australia is pleased to provide the following response to Notification 2018/041 ‘Request for new information on shark and ray conservation and management activities, including legislation’. This document is an update of the information submitted in 2017 in response to Notification 2017/031. The Australian Government is committed to the sustainable use of fisheries resources and the conservation of marine ecosystems and biodiversity. In particular, we are committed to the conservation of shark species in Australian waters and on the high seas. The Australian Government manages some fisheries directly, others are managed by state and territory governments. The Australian Government also regulates the export of commercially harvested marine species. Australia cooperates internationally to protect sharks by implementing our Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) obligations, and by working with regional fisheries management organisations on the management of internationally straddling and highly migratory stocks. For more information on Australia’s fisheries management and international cooperation see the Australian Government Department of the Environment and Energy’s fisheries webpages at http://www.environment.gov.au/marine/fisheries.
  • Sawfish and River Sharks Multispecies Recovery Plan

    Sawfish and River Sharks Multispecies Recovery Plan

    Sawfish and River Sharks Multispecies Recovery Plan 2015 The issues paper linked to this plan is obtainable from: http://www.environment.gov.au/resource/recovery-plan-sawfish-and-river-sharks © Copyright Commonwealth of Australia 2015 Sawfish and River Sharks Multispecies Recovery Plan is licensed by the Commonwealth of Australia for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logo of the agency responsible for publishing the report, content supplied by third parties, and any images depicting people. For licence conditions see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. This report should be attributed as ‘Sawfish and River Sharks Multispecies Recovery Plan, Commonwealth of Australia 2015’. The Commonwealth of Australia has made all reasonable efforts to identify content supplied by third parties using the following format ‘© Copyright, [name of third party] ’. Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for the Environment. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Commonwealth does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. Image Credits Front Cover: Largetooth sawfish (Pristis pristis) in the Daly River (© Copyright, Richard Pillans). Back Cover: Green sawfish (Pristis zijsron) juvenile from Pilbara (© Copyright, Richard Pillans).
  • States' Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Laws Hunting, Fishing, and Wildlife

    States' Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Laws Hunting, Fishing, and Wildlife

    University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture An Agricultural Law Research Project States’ Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Laws Hunting, Fishing, and Wildlife Florida www.NationalAgLawCenter.org States’ Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Laws Hunting, Fishing, and Wildlife STATE OF FLORIDA 68B-44.002 FAC Current through March 28, 2020 68B-44.002 FAC Definitions As used in this rule chapter: (1) “Finned” means one or more fins, including the caudal fin (tail), are no longer naturally attached to the body of the shark. A shark with fins naturally attached, either wholly or partially, is not considered finned. (2) “Shark” means any species of the orders Carcharhiniformes, Lamniformes, Hexanchiformes, Orectolobiformes, Pristiophoriformes, Squaliformes, Squatiniformes, including but not limited to any of the following species or any part thereof: (a) Large coastal species: 1. Blacktip shark -- (Carcharhinus limbatus). 2. Bull shark -- (Carcharhinus leucas). 3. Nurse shark -- (Ginglymostoma cirratum). 4. Spinner shark -- (Carcharhinus brevipinna). (b) Small coastal species: 1. Atlantic sharpnose shark -- (Rhizoprionodon terraenovae). 2. Blacknose shark -- (Carcharhinus acronotus). 3. Bonnethead -- (Sphyrna tiburo). 4. Finetooth shark -- (Carcharhinus isodon). (c) Pelagic species: 1. Blue shark -- (Prionace glauca). 2. Oceanic whitetip shark -- (Carcharhinus longimanus). 3. Porbeagle shark -- (Lamna nasus). 4. Shortfin mako -- (Isurus oxyrinchus). 5. Thresher shark -- (Alopias vulpinus). (d) Smoothhound sharks: 1. Smooth dogfish -- (Mustelus canis). 2. Florida smoothhound (Mustelus norrisi). 3. Gulf smoothhound (Mustelus sinusmexicanus). (e) Atlantic angel shark (Squatina dumeril). (f) Basking shark (Cetorhinus maximus). (g) Bigeye sand tiger (Odontaspis noronhai). (h) Bigeye sixgill shark (Hexanchus nakamurai). (i) Bigeye thresher (Alopias superciliosus). (j) Bignose shark (Carcharhinus altimus). (k) Bluntnose sixgill shark (Hexanchus griseus). (l) Caribbean reef shark (Carcharhinus perezii).
  • A Practical Key for the Identification of Large Fish Rostra 145-160 ©Zoologische Staatssammlung München/Verlag Friedrich Pfeil; Download

    A Practical Key for the Identification of Large Fish Rostra 145-160 ©Zoologische Staatssammlung München/Verlag Friedrich Pfeil; Download

    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Spixiana, Zeitschrift für Zoologie Jahr/Year: 2015 Band/Volume: 038 Autor(en)/Author(s): Lange Tabea, Brehm Julian, Moritz Timo Artikel/Article: A practical key for the identification of large fish rostra 145-160 ©Zoologische Staatssammlung München/Verlag Friedrich Pfeil; download www.pfeil-verlag.de SPIXIANA 38 1 145-160 München, August 2015 ISSN 0341-8391 A practical key for the identification of large fish rostra (Pisces) Tabea Lange, Julian Brehm & Timo Moritz Lange, T., Brehm, J. & Moritz, T. 2015. A practical key for the identification of large fish rostra (Pisces). Spixiana 38 (1): 145-160. Large fish rostra without data of origin or determination are present in many museum collections or may appear in customs inspections. In recent years the inclu- sion of fish species on national and international lists for the protection of wildlife resulted in increased trading regulations. Therefore, useful identification tools are of growing importance. Here, we present a practical key for large fish rostra for the families Pristidae, Pristiophoridae, Xiphiidae and Istiophoridae. This key allows determination on species level for three of four families. Descriptions of the rostrum characteristics of the respective taxa are given. Tabea Lange, Lindenallee 38, 18437 Stralsund Julian Brehm, Königsallee 5, 95448 Bayreuth Timo Moritz, Deutsches Meeresmuseum, Katharinenberg 14-20, 18439 Stralsund; e-mail: [email protected] Introduction Polyodon spathula is equipped with a spoon-like rostrum which is used as an electrosensory organ Rostra are found in many fish species and can for locating plankton in water columns (Wilkens & be used for hunting (Wueringer et al.
  • Northern River Shark, Glyphis Garricki

    Northern River Shark, Glyphis Garricki

    Published Date: 1 March 2019 Northern River Shark, Glyphis garricki Report Card Depleted assessment IUCN Red List IUCN Red List Australian Refer to Global Assessment Global Critically Endangered Assessment Assessment Assessors Pogonoski, J. & Pollard, D. Report Card Remarks Rare species with possibly very few mature individuals remaining Summary The Northern River Shark is a rare species found in northern Australia and Papua New Guinea. It is suggested that fewer than 250 mature individuals exist. It is threatened by fishing pressure and is presumably taken as bycatch in commercial and recreational fisheries. Habitat Source: White et al. 2015. License: CC By degradation is another likely Attribution. threat due to its coastal and estuarine distribution. It is listed as Endangered on the Environment Protection Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 list of threatened species and hence protected under Commonwealth law. A recovery plan has been developed. Until abundance can be proven to be greater than suspected levels, it is assessed as Critically Endangered (IUCN) and in Australia, Overfished (SAFS). Distribution The distribution of the Northern River Shark is uncertain. It occurs in marine, freshwater and estuarine habitats and is known to occur in several areas in Western Australia (Ord and King Rivers, King Sound and Joseph Bonaparte Gulf) and Northern Territory (South and East Alligator Rivers and Wessel islands) (Last and Stevens 2009). It has been confirmed as occurring in Papua New Guinea with the finding of two individuals in the coastal marine waters of the Daru region (White et al. 2015). This was the first confirmed record of this species in Papua New Guinea since the 1970s (White et al.
  • Complete Mitochondrial DNA Genome of Bonnethead Shark, Sphyrna Tiburo, and Phylogenetic Relationships Among Main Superorders of Modern Elasmobranchs

    Complete Mitochondrial DNA Genome of Bonnethead Shark, Sphyrna Tiburo, and Phylogenetic Relationships Among Main Superorders of Modern Elasmobranchs

    Meta Gene 7 (2016) 48–55 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Meta Gene journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/mgene Complete mitochondrial DNA genome of bonnethead shark, Sphyrna tiburo, and phylogenetic relationships among main superorders of modern elasmobranchs Píndaro Díaz-Jaimes a,⁎, Natalia J. Bayona-Vásquez a, Douglas H. Adams b, Manuel Uribe-Alcocer a a Laboratorio de Genética de Organismos Acuáticos, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apdo. Postal 70-305, México D.F. 04510, Mexico b Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, 1220 Prospect Avenue, Suite 285, Melbourne, FL 32901, USA article info abstract Article history: Elasmobranchs are one of the most diverse groups in the marine realm represented by 18 orders, 55 families and Received 2 September 2015 about 1200 species reported, but also one of the most vulnerable to exploitation and to climate change. Phyloge- Revised 18 November 2015 netic relationships among main orders have been controversial since the emergence of the Hypnosqualean Accepted 19 November 2015 hypothesis by Shirai (1992) that considered batoids as a sister group of sharks. The use of the complete Available online 24 November 2015 mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) may shed light to further validate this hypothesis by increasing the number of Keywords: informative characters. We report the mtDNA genome of the bonnethead shark Sphyrna tiburo, and compare it Bonnethead with mitogenomes of other 48 species to assess phylogenetic relationships. The mtDNA genome of S. tiburo,is Mitogenome quite similar in size to that of congeneric species but also similar to the reported mtDNA genome of other Phylogeny Carcharhinidae species.
  • Annotated Checklist of the Fishes of Lord Howe Island

    Annotated Checklist of the Fishes of Lord Howe Island

    AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS Allen, Gerald R., Douglass F. Hoese, John R. Paxton, J. E. Randall, C. Russell, W. A. Starck, F. H. Talbot, and G. P. Whitley, 1977. Annotated checklist of the fishes of Lord Howe Island. Records of the Australian Museum 30(15): 365–454. [21 December 1976]. doi:10.3853/j.0067-1975.30.1977.287 ISSN 0067-1975 Published by the Australian Museum, Sydney naturenature cultureculture discover discover AustralianAustralian Museum Museum science science is is freely freely accessible accessible online online at at www.australianmuseum.net.au/publications/www.australianmuseum.net.au/publications/ 66 CollegeCollege Street,Street, SydneySydney NSWNSW 2010,2010, AustraliaAustralia ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE FISHES OF LORD HOWE ISLAND G. R. ALLEN, 1,2 D. F. HOESE,1 J. R. PAXTON,1 J. E. RANDALL, 3 B. C. RUSSELL},4 W. A. STARCK 11,1 F. H. TALBOT,1,4 AND G. P. WHITlEy5 SUMMARY lord Howe Island, some 630 kilometres off the northern coast of New South Wales, Australia at 31.5° South latitude, is the world's southern most locality with a well developed coral reef community and associated lagoon. An extensive collection of fishes from lord Howelsland was made during a month's expedition in February 1973. A total of 208 species are newly recorded from lord Howe Island and 23 species newly recorded from the Australian mainland. The fish fauna of lord Howe is increased to 447 species in 107 families. Of the 390 species of inshore fishes, the majority (60%) are wide-ranging tropical forms; some 10% are found only at lord Howe Island, southern Australia and/or New Zealand.
  • (Speartooth Shark) Approved Conservation Advice Page 1 of 7 This Conservation Advice Was Approved by the Delegate of the Minister on 11 April 2014

    (Speartooth Shark) Approved Conservation Advice Page 1 of 7 This Conservation Advice Was Approved by the Delegate of the Minister on 11 April 2014

    This Conservation Advice was approved by the Delegate of the Minister on 11 April 2014 Approved Conservation Advice for Glyphis glyphis (speartooth shark) (s266B of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999) This Conservation Advice has been developed based on the best available information at the time this Conservation Advice was approved; this includes existing and draft plans, records or management prescriptions for this species. Description Glyphis glyphis (speartooth shark), family Carcharhinidae, also known as Bizant river shark and Queensland river shark, is a medium-sized whaler shark characterised by a short snout, broadly rounded in dorsoventral view, bluntly pointed in lateral view; tall second dorsal fin, height 67–76% of first dorsal-fin; 26-29 triangular, blade-like upper teeth and 27-29 tall narrow lower teeth. It has a slate greyish coloration dorsally and is abruptly white below, with tonal junction extending just below the eyes and a total vertebrae count of 213–222 (Last & Stevens, 2009; Compagno et al., 2008). Based on limited data, speartooth sharks are approximately 50-60 cm at birth and are believed to grow to over 2 m when mature (Stevens et al., 2005; Pillans et al., 2008). Conservation Status Speartooth sharks (Glyphis glyphis) are listed as critically endangered under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). The species is eligible for listing as critically endangered as it satisfies criterion 2 (geographic distribution), 3 (population size and decline in numbers or distribution) and 4 (population size) of the eligibility criteria (TSSC, 2001). The species was listed as critically endangered in 2001 based on its limited geographic distribution and the estimated total number of mature individuals being extremely low and likely to continue to decline (TSSC, 2001).