DOCSLIB.ORG

Feasibility Study Volume Ii for Koppers Company

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Feasibility Study Volume Ii for Koppers Company . !, ' . ' , , . ' , I _..,.. • '••••• .,,••• :.• • •••• • ~• ...... • :• ·••• ••r ~ • • • • .••• •••••• ••• • • • • •• -• •.•-••.• ~-•• • .',. • ~ •I••• • Document No. 4040-001-600 I 1 Feasibility Study Report I Koppers Texarkana Site I Texarkana, Texas ... I If\ \() I Volume 11 - Appendices (\J I I I I I I Prepared for KOPPERS COMPANY, INC. I Pittsburgh, PA I June 1988 I 1 ERT I An ENSR Company I 000185 I . · I , _ . ; . , _ . - . ' - . I ii ~ I I I I I (\J TREATABILl1Y STUDY REPORT KOPPERS COMPANY, INC. L0i I TEXARKANA, TEXAS '° ....C\I I 0 I Prepared for: KOPPERS COMPANY, INC. PREVIOUSLY OPERATED PROPERTY I TEXARKANA, TEXAS I Prepared by: KEYSTONE ENVIRONl\fENTAL RESOURCES, INC. I 440 COLLEGE PARK DRIVE MONROEVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA 15146 I I I PROJECT 157673-0S I FEBRUARY 1988 I I I I . I . ·. ' ' . -L . • I • . ., . ·. ' '. .~ ' , . .. \ . I TABLE OF CONTENTS I Page LIST 01· TABLES ......................................................................................................................... 111 I LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................... iii EXECtrTIVE SUI\IMARY .......................................................................................................... ES-1 I 1.0 l~TRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1-l I 2.1 Site History ............................................................................................................... 2-l 2.2 Site Description ....................................................................................................... 2~ 1 I"'\ I 3.0 STUDY OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................... 3- l Lf\ \() 3.1 Sample Collection ................................................................................................... 3- 1 (\J I 3-""2 Sarnple Analysis ....... ".. -t. .......... "' ............................................ c ......... ~ .................................................... , .............................. + ................... ~3-1 3.3 Groundv,1ater Treatability ...................................................................................... 3-l 3.4 Activated Carbon Adsorbtion Testing ................................................................ .3-2 0 I 3.5 UV/Ozone Oxidation .............................................................................................. 3-2 3.6 Biological Treatrnent .............................................................................................. 3-3 3. 7 Soil Treattnent ......................................................................................................... 3-4 I -to TREATABILITI' STUDY SPECIFICS AND RESULTS .............................................. 4-l 4.1 Sample Collection ................................................................................................... 4-1 I 4.2 Ground\vater Treatability ...................................................................................... 4•3 4.3 Activated Carbon Adsorbtion ............................................................................... 4-4 4.4 ExSitu Soil Treatment (Soil Washing) ................................................................ .4-6 I 4.5 lnSitu Soil Treatment (Soi! Column) ................................................................... 4-6 4.6 U.V/O~one Oxidation 03 ....................................................................................... 4-7 4.7 B1olog1cal Treatment .............................................................................................. 4-8 I 4.8 Biological Treatment Units Discussion of Results .......................................... 4• 12 5.0 SU.rt·IIVIARY AND CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................. 5- l I APPE~DICES APPEND IX A Groundwater ONQC Sampling Data APPE~DIX B Carbon Adsorbtion ACT Results I APPENDIX C UV/Ozone Oxidation Results APPE"IDIX D Biolosical Treatment Intluet Results APPEND IX E Aeratmn Tank Treatment Results I APPESDIX F Fixed Film Treatment Results APPE~D IX G Fluidized Bed Treatment Results I I I I ii I .. •· • . • . • ·. I I •- " . I LIST OF TABLES Page I 3-1 Analytical Methods - Water Analysis ................................................................ 3- la I 3-2 Analytical Methods - Soil Analysis .................................................................... 3-1 b 4-1 Jar Testi11g Results ............................................................................................... 4-4a I Carbon Adsorption Isotherms ............................................................................ 4-Sa 4-3 03/lJV Screening Run Results .......................................................................... 4-8,ol I UV/Ozone 1·reatment .......................................................................................... 4-8c I Biological Treatment Comparison .................................................................. 4-12a Biological Treatment Phenolics Reduction .................................................... 4-l 3a I 0 I LIST OF FIGURES Groundwater Treatment Overview ................................................................... 4-3.1 I Ozone Applied vs Naphthalene ......................................................................... -t-Sb I I I I I I I I iii I I EXECUT[VE SU~tMARY This document summarizes the results of performance testing conducted by I Keystone Environmental Resources, Inc. for the purpose of evaluating the technical feasibility of various treatment processes for the remediation of groundwater and soil I contaminated with coal tar related organics. The coal tar organics present in the soil and groundwater originated from the past operations of a former Koppers wood I treating and preserving plant. The technologies examined herein have passed the initial screening process and have I Ui been considered for treatability investigation. The technologies considered in the I.{\ screening where based on the characterization work performed during the remedial \() I investig:Hion. The analytical results from surface water, groundwater and soil (\J samples, \1.,ere used as the basis to examine the different technologies. I C \Vith the exception of the Accelerated Carbon Testing performed by Calgon Carbon I Corporation, all treatability work was performed by Keystone Environmental Resources at the Science and Technology Center in Monroeville, PA. Groundwater and soil samples were collected by Keystone Field Service technicians for use in the I treatability work. All related analysis were performed by Keystone's Analytical I Division. Following pretreatment for removal of oil and grea.)e associated contaminants, three I groundwater methods were evaluated. These incJuded: (i) carbon adsorption, (ii) chemical oxidation, and (iii) biological treatment. Carbon adsorption treatment I included carbon adsorption isotherms and Accelerated Carbon Column Testing. Chemical oxidation focused on UV/Ozone Oxidation treatment. The biological treatment alternatives evaluated were: (i) activated sludge, (ii) aeration tank, (iii) I fixed film, and (iv) fluidized bed. I In-situ and ex-situ soil treatment technologies were also evaluated. Five soil columns \•.:ere set up to investigate variations of bioreclamation treatment methodologies. In I addition1 soil washing was investigated for removal of contaminants from the soil matrix. I I ES-1 I I I With the exception of activated sludge treatment, all other groundwater treatment processes tested were successful for reduction of groundwater contaminants. The t\vo activated sludge treatment reactors were convened to an aeration tank and a I fixed film reactor when the data indicated the groundwater organic substrate was to I low to support an activated sludge biomass. Shortly following start-up of the soil columns , plugging occurred and the columns I were shut down. Soil washing was completed with preliminary successfu] results. Complete soil washing results will be issued as an addendum when all results are I available. '°lf\ Pretreatment result,; showed an 83% reduction of oil and grease with a I corresponding removal of 90. 7% of total PAH compounds. Carbon adsorbtion (\J'° isotherms and ACT results show reduction of TOC and naphthalene. UV~ C I Ozone/Oxidation reduced the total PAH concentration 88%. Aeration tank treatment reduced total PAH compounds >99%. Fixed film treatment reduced total I P AH compounds >86%. The best treatment was realized with the fluidized bed with > 99. 9% removal of total PAH compounds. I The data presented in this report can be used in a more detailed evaluation of these I and other technologies as needed for Feasibility Study (FS) purposes. I I I I I I I LO INIRQDUCTION Presented in this document are the results from treatability work performed as I partial fulfillment of the Feasibility Study (FS) for the Koppers Texarkana former wood~treating plant site in Texarkana, Texas. I Koppers and the U.S. EPA have conducted several separate surface and subsurface investigations and collected extensive soil and groundwater quality data at the Texarkana site. The results of these studies have identified the contaminants and extent of contamination. These data were used to select the treatability alternatives r­ for laboratory experimentation best suited for remediation. L(\ '°N I The focus of the study
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nanoporous Materials, Examines the Market Tal Microporous Materials
    R NEW US Industry Study Freedonia with forecasts to 2007 & 2012 Study # 1746 January 2004 Nanoporous $3900 Materials US Microporous Materials Demand ($1.5 billion, 2002) Zeolites 47% Clays, zeolites, Petroleum refining activated carbon to to remain largest remain dominant value end-use market Among the variety of materials Petroleum refining will remain that possess microporous the largest value end-use qualities, clays, zeolites and market for microporous materi- Clays activated carbons have als, which serve as catalysts 23% emerged as the most widely and catalyst carriers. Although used. They are used in applica- zeolites are the dominant tions as diverse as pet litter, microporous material in use in Activated detergent builders, water refining catalysts, other Carbon treatment chemicals, catalysts microporous materials — such The best prospects for activated 18% carbon (above) — and other more and food and beverage process- as clays, activated alumina and mature microporous materials — exist Other Materials ing aids, and will remain the silica gels — are also con- in environmental markets such as 11% dominant microporous products sumed. Opportunities will arise solvent recovery and odor control. through 2007. However, many of in novel microporous catalyst these applications are mature materials, and in catalysts for and offer limited opportunities hydrotreating and zeolites, virtually every activated alumina, silica for future growth. hydroprocessing. microporous material has gels); by market (e.g., some use in environmental petroleum refining, pet Activated alumina, Environmental markets. litter, soaps and deter- gents, water treatment, silica gels offer best markets to lead gains Study coverage environmental, foods and growth prospects beverages, chemicals); Environmental markets com- Details on these and other and by application (e.g., Better potential lies in products prise the fastest growing group findings are available in the catalysis, adsorbency, ion such as activated alumina, silica of end uses for microporous new Freedonia study, exchange).
    [Show full text]
  • Official Proceedings the International Water
    The Conference on Industrial Water OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS THE INTERNATIONAL WATER CONFERENCE® 71st ANNUAL MEETING October 24-28, 2010 The Crowne Plaza Riverwalk Hotel San Antonio, TX, USA Wayne E. Bernahl General Chair John T. Lucey, Jr., P.E. Michael C. Gottlieb Program Chair Marketing Chair Sponsored by Engineers’ Society of Western Pennsylvania Incorporated 1880 Rights to reprint articles in this publication may be granted, provided that: written permission from the author and a statement of the prospective author’s intent are received by the IWC and that the IWC grants written permission to the prospective publisher. The opinions and findings expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of the International Water Conference®, Advisory Council, or the Engineers’ Society of Western Pennsylvania. © Engineers’ Society of Western Pennsylvania Condensate Polishing Systems for Power Plants Session Chair: Robert Bartholomew, Sheppard T. Powell Associates LLC, Baltimore, MD Discussion Leader: Deborah Bloom, Nalco Company, Naperville, IL IWC Representative: David Simon, II, Cyrus Rice Water Consultants, Pittsburgh, PA Design Considerations for Condensate Polishing Off-Site Regeneration Gerald (Jerry) Alexander - Siemens Water Technologies, La Canada, CA IWC-10-01 Amine Form Operation of Deep Bed Condensate Polishing Ion Exchange Resins Lewis Crone - Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc., Waterford, CT IWC-10-02 A Report On Resin Separation and Backwash Efficiency of Mixed Bed Ion Exchange Resins William Moore - Aquatech, Canonsburg, PA; Bharathwaj Gopalakrishnan and Gary L. Foutch, School of Chemical Engineering, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK IWC-10-03 Industrial Wastewater Treatment Session Chair: Paul Pigeon, P.E., Golder Associates Inc., Lakewood, CO Discussion Leader: Ajit Ghorpade, N.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Aiming to Become a Trusted Specialty Chemical Company Through the Provision of Sustainable Social Value
    TOP STATEMENT Aiming to Become a Trusted Specialty Chemical Company through the Provision of Sustainable Social Value Masaaki Ito Representative Director and President In anticipation of celebrating its centennial in six years, the Kuraray Group is currently focusing on the development of a new business portfolio aiming at sustainable growth, and promoting further growth strategies. Here, I’d like to introduce the sources of corporate value that the Kuraray Group has been developing since its foundation and the progress of the Medium-Term Management Plan “PROUD 2020.” Originality, the Willingness to Take on Challenges, and the Intention to Provide Value Since its foundation, the Kuraray Group has been growing by chemistry by using technologies in polymer and synthetic cultivating markets and continuing to offer value to society, chemistry that were acquired through such technology devel- while pursuing manufacturing with originality on the back of its opment and production, starting from materials, continued to technological development capabilities. It can be said that one focus obsessively on originality, and expanded our business, of its origins is synthetic fiber, KURALON™ (PVA fiber), which resulting in the creation of many businesses with the world’s we succeeded in commercializing for the first time in the world No.1 share. The percentage of the sales of the businesses with in 1950 and which celebrates its 70th anniversary this year. At the world’s No.1 share to the Group’s net sales has grown to the time, the Japanese fiber and textile industry depended on as much as 58% today, acting as a driving force that underpins materials and technologies from overseas; however, our the competitiveness of the Kuraray Group.
    [Show full text]
  • 5–7–09 Vol. 74 No. 87 Thursday May 7, 2009 Pages 21245–21532
    5–7–09 Thursday Vol. 74 No. 87 May 7, 2009 Pages 21245–21532 VerDate Nov 24 2008 21:36 May 06, 2009 Jkt 217001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\07MYWS.LOC 07MYWS II Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 87 / Thursday, May 7, 2009 The FEDERAL REGISTER (ISSN 0097–6326) is published daily, SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Tuesday through Friday, except official holidays, by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records PUBLIC Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register Subscriptions: Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) and the regulations of the Administrative Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Committee of the Federal Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Assistance with public subscriptions 202–512–1806 Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 is the exclusive distributor of the official General online information 202–512–1530; 1–888–293–6498 edition. Periodicals postage is paid at Washington, DC. Single copies/back copies: The FEDERAL REGISTER provides a uniform system for making Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Assistance with public single copies 1–866–512–1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and (Toll-Free) Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general FEDERAL AGENCIES applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public Subscriptions: interest. Paper or fiche 202–741–6005 Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions 202–741–6005 Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the issuing agency requests earlier filing.
    [Show full text]
  • IN the LEADLETOADP 50 Acquisitio Ns Can Really Spik E Revenue Growth
    ANNUAL BUSINESS REPORT 2017 EDITION IN TRAN SFORMED FO THER THE FUTURE IN THE LEADLETOADP 50 Acquisitio ns can really spik e revenue growth HE Lead TRANSFORMED FOR THE FUTURE IN T ture BY TERE SA F. LINDE PITTSB MAN URGH POST-G Toby Talb AZETTE He ot/Associated rastruC inz ketchu F Press p. Few Acqu things spike isitions also the revenue were a fact year, even other busi line like acqu compan or for so me of if , as inIth N ness, iring ies rank the ot e case but the new an- ed high on her Firs of Buffalo, N. that Kraft Heinz bers the revenue t Niagara, it Y.-based ba maneuver wi Co. executed , with Nort change num- was only a nk th special gu h Shore memor Se 0.1 percent in By sto last year Matth ial and ca venteen comp crease. merging Pitt . ews Intern sket maker anies saw sburgh’s H. ational’s 28.9 the pr their revenu $10.92 bi J. Heinz Co. second percent incr evious year, es drop from llion in 2014 and its -place rank ease and with Montrea revenues wi ing as well as the bott l-based Bo Foods Gr th Illinois- S&T Ba Indiana, Pa om of the list mbardier at oup in July based Kraft ncorp’s 22.7 .-based with a 9.6 pe 2015, the new percent gain Judged rcent declin jumped to global food tion, both and fourth-p only on tota e. $18.34 billio company made possib lace posi- l revenue fi n in revenues le in part by $18.17 billio gures, Bomb fiscal year — for the most nesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemicals Update | Summer 2020
    Introduction Dear Clients and Friends, We hope this finds you and your families safe and well. We recognize that the past several months have been unprecedented times for you and your families, friends, colleagues, businesses, and investments. All of us are facing unique challenges and threats in this new environment. To help provide you with an update on the current chemicals market in this novel climate, Houlihan Lokey is pleased to present its Chemicals Summer 2020 Industry Update. In this issue, we have included relevant news stories, recent M&A transaction announcements, a public markets overview, and other industry insights to help you stay ahead in this evolving industry. We hope you find this quarterly update to be informative and that it serves as a valuable resource to you in staying abreast of the market. If there is additional content you would find useful for future updates, please don’t hesitate to call or email us with your suggestions. We look forward to staying in touch with you. Regards, Chemicals Group Contacts Financial and Valuation Advisory Mike Giffin Christopher Glad Zachary Mueller Managing Director Director Financial Analyst [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 214.220.8485 312.456.4730 312.456.4763 Corporate Finance Leland Harrs Martin Bastian Head of Chemicals Head of Chemicals, Europe [email protected] [email protected] 212.497.7842 +49 (0) 69 256 246 171 2 Houlihan Lokey is the trusted advisor to more top decision- makers than any other independent global investment bank. Corporate Finance Financial Restructuring Financial and Valuation Advisory 2019 M&A Advisory Rankings 2019 Global Distressed Debt & Bankruptcy 2000 to 2019 Global M&A Fairness All U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • ACCD Annual Report 03
    REGIONAL VISION GLOBAL IMPACT The Allegheny Conference on Community Development and its affiliates (Pittsburgh Regional Alliance, Greater Pittsburgh Chamber of Commerce and Pennsylvania Economy League —Western Division) are advancing 3 Rivers: One Future, a regional initiative to stimulate growth in Southwestern Pennsylvania’s economy and improve its quality of life. Regional Enterprise Tower ALLEGHENY CONFERENCE ON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 425 Sixth Avenue, Suite 1100 Pittsburgh, PA 15219 AND ITS AFFILIATES Toll-free: 1 (877) 392-1300 Phone: (outside of U.S. and Canada) +1 (412) 392-1000 ANNUAL REPORT 2003 Fax: (412) 392-1005 Email: ???? www.accdpel.org PENNSYLVANIA ECONOMY LEAGUE GREATER PITTSBURGH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PITTSBURGH REGIONAL ALLIANCE REGIONAL VISION GLOBAL IMPACT 03 LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN For almost 250 years, Southwestern universities, a strong work ethic and Pennsylvania has been a point of a high quality of life. Working in convergence, of east and west, capital partnership with numerous organizations and creativity, and innovation and and the public sector, we will prevail. entrepreneurship. Today, the private To the members of the Allegheny sector leadership of our region is Conference Regional Investors Council, converging again to advance a shared your commitment of time, talent and vision, 3 Rivers: One Future. The resources is an essential component leadership of the Allegheny Conference for our region’s success. I also commend on Community Development and its our many stakeholders and partners. Affiliates, the Pennsylvania Economy Economic and community development League-Western Division, Greater is a long-term investment. I extend my Pittsburgh Chamber of Commerce and personal thanks for your continued Pittsburgh Regional Alliance has created participation and leadership.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2016 ANNUAL REPORT INTRODUCTION a Message from Our Executive Director and Board of Directors
    2016 ANNUAL REPORT 2016 ANNUAL REPORT INTRODUCTION A MESSAGE FROM OUR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS Values are much more than words on our website. Values shape the commitment we make to the children and families who trust and depend upon Sarah Heinz House. They define who we are as an organization and reflect the professionalism of the staff and volunteers who serve the hundreds of youth coming through our doors each week. Kids 1st is our highest value. Their emotional and physical safety, learning and development and sheer enjoyment of their childhood and adolescent years is what matters most in all we do. Whether they’re engaged in afterschool and weekend programs or summer camp, our foremost responsibility is to provide experiences that let them know that the high expectations and standards we set for them represent the equally high level of respect and value in which we hold them. Sarah Heinz House is a community-sort of an extended family, for each youth. We know they do not fully leave behind the real world challenges or forget each frustration they encountered on any given day. But this extended family, comprised of friends, and peer and adult mentors offers a safe and caring environment to help set them aside or resolve them in a healthy and positive way. Kids 1st is what our parents, partners and donors expect. We are humbled by the respect and confidence that leads parents to entrust their children to us each day. We are grateful to all the individuals, companies and foundations who choose Sarah Heinz House as a trusted partner in fulfilling their goal of improving the lives and opportunities of our region’s youth.
    [Show full text]
  • Calgon Carbon Corporation 2016 Annual Report
    2016 Annual Report CALGON CARBON CORPORATION 103 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (Dollars in millions except per share data) 20163 2015 2014 2013 20124 Net Sales $514.2 $535.0 $555.1 $547.9 $562.3 Gross Margin%1 32.6% 35.8% 34.6% 33.0% 30.2% Operating Expense% 20.5% 17.1% 15.7% 15.1% 16.6% Income from Operations $ 24.5 $ 64.8 $ 74.6 $ 68.9 $ 39.9 Net Income $ 13.8 $ 43.5 $ 49.4 $ 45.7 $ 23.3 Net Income per Common Share (Diluted) $ 0.27 $ 0.82 $ 0.92 $ 0.84 $ 0.41 EBITDA%2 11.8% 18.6% 18.6% 17.6% 11.3% Cash Dividends per Common Share $ 0.20 $ 0.20 $ — $ — $ — Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities $ 69.0 $ 69.9 $ 84.3 $ 66.8 $ 72.7 (1) Net sales less the cost of products sold (excluding depreciation and amortization) as a percentage of net sales. (2) Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization as a percentage of net sales. (3) Includes $15.7 million of costs related to the November 2, 2016 acquisition of the wood-based activated carbon, reactivation, and mineral- based filtration media business (the New Business). Refer to Note 20 of the consolidated financial statements included in the Company's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K (that is part of this Annual Report) for further information. (4) Includes $10.2 million of restructuring charges, $1.7 million of multi-employer pension charges, and a $1.7 million charge related to an agreement with the Company's former Chief Executive Officer.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Post Show Recap Montréal
    Save the Date! July 19-22, 2015 2014 Post Show Recap Montréal The 2014 BIO World Congress on Industrial Biotechnology set a US record bringing together 1,100 delegates representing 45+ countries! These leaders in advanced biofuels and renewable chemicals engaged in plenary sessions, breakout sessions, workshops, Clean Tech Investor Sessions, poster presentations, exhibits, networking receptions and 1,000+ BIO One on One PartneringTM meetings. Who was in Philadelphia? WHO THEY ARE 21% 19% 36% 13% 5% 6% 1,100 CHIEF OFFICER VICE PRESIDENT DIRECTOR ATTENDEES RESEARCHER/ SCIENTIST FACULTY OTHER WHERE THEY CAME FROM » TOP 10 DELEGATION » LEARN MORE ABOUT FORMING A DELEGATION HERE DENMARK CANADA UNITED KINGDOM NETHERLANDS GERMANY MALAYSIA 45% FRANCE OF ATTENDEES TRAVEL FROM OUTSIDE OF THE BRAZIL INDIA AUSTRALIA UNITED STATES INDUSTRY BREAKDOWN » EXAMPLES BY SECTOR » VIEW ALL COMPANIES HERE Clariant Joule Cargill CH2M Hill CLIB2021 DuPont Mascoma Evolva Krieg DeVault BE Basic Foundation ITOCHU Tate & Lyle Iowa Economic Academia Solvay End Users Development Arizona State The Coca-Cola Oil Companies International Trade Colorado State Biotech Companies Company Chevron Commission Cornell Ajinimoto Estee Lauder Total North Carolina Drexel Amyris Ikea Group Exxon Mobil Biotechnology Center Iowa State AVA Biochem Proctor & Gamble St. Louis McGill 640 Novozymes Investors Scotland Development COMPANIES Novasep Feedstock Providers Capricorn Ventures International Government REPRESENTED Caenergy First Green Partners Organizations/ Biofuels Georgia Pacific
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practices for the Osisoft UC and Slide Template
    “You can’t control what you can’t measure” “Data without context is limited” Transform Your World with Data “Real-time data delivers proactive versus reactive management” “Without data you’re just another person with an opinion” “There’s no EBITDA without BI” Presented by Martin Jetté, Eng, Regional Manager – Canada [email protected] REGIONAL SEMINARS 2015 © Copyright 2015 OSIsoft, LLC We believe People with Data can Transform their world REGIONAL SEMINARS 2015 © Copyright 2015 OSIsoft, LLC Video placeholder (see video replay). REGIONAL SEMINARS 2015 © Copyright 2015 OSIsoft, LLC Agenda 1 Vision: Transforming Your World With Data How: Transform data into 2 information for real-time decision support How: Transform information 3 into intelligence REGIONAL SEMINARS 2015 © Copyright 2015 OSIsoft, LLC ABB, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Laboratories, Abitibi Consolidated, Accenture, Acciona Energía, Accelerating Data Center Efficiency, Adani Ports & SEZ Limited, ADM Systems and Engineering, ADM Systems Engineering Ltd., Advanced Solutions, AEP, AES, AES Tietê and Critical Software, Air Liquide, Akenerji Elektrik Üretim A.S., Aker Solutioions, Akzo Nobel Base Chemicals B.V., Akzo Nobel Base Chemicals BV, Alberto-Culver, Alcoa, Alcoa Global Primary Metals, Alcoa Power Generating, Inc., Alcoa Power Generating, Inc., Aligned Energy, All, Allegheny Energy, Alliance Pipeline, Alliander, Alliander NV, Alliant Energy, Alyeska Pipeline, Alyeska Pipeline Service Company, American Electric Power, American National Power, Amgen, Amitec, Amitec AS, Amonix,
    [Show full text]
  • Leroy Ball Joins ATI Board of Directors
    Leroy Ball Joins ATI Board of Directors 02/28/19 PITTSBURGH--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (NYSE: ATI) today announced that Leroy M. Ball has been appointed to the ATI Board of Directors. This press release features multimedia. View the full release here: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20190228005915/en/ Mr. Ball, 50, is President and Chief Executive Officer of Koppers Holdings Inc., a leading integrated global provider of treated wood products, wood treatment chemicals and carbon compounds. Mr. Ball previously served as Koppers’ Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Since becoming CEO in January 2015, Mr. Ball led Koppers’ transformation into a company prioritizing customer- focused solutions that enhance and preserve wood while de-emphasizing its focus on commodity products serving the aluminum industry. During that time, he has overseen several acquisitions and divestitures to strategically re-shape the company’s portfolio and increase shareholder value. For eight years prior to joining Koppers, Mr. Ball was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Calgon Carbon, Inc., a provider of services, products and solutions for purifying water and air. “We welcome Leroy’s significant leadership experience operating global companies,” said ATI Chairman Rich Harshman. “His experiences guiding a company through strategic change as well as his financial expertise and experience will be invaluable to the ATI Board and leadership team as we continue to build the world’s best specialty materials and components company.” Mr. Ball holds an undergraduate degree from Florida International University and received his MBA from Robert Morris University. He will serve on the ATI Board Leroy M.
    [Show full text]