Report to NIST on the Smart Grid Interoperability Standards Roadmap 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report to NIST on the Smart Grid Interoperability Standards Roadmap 1 Please Read: About This Document—Report to NIST on the Smart Grid Interoperability Standards Roadmap 1 Under the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has “primary responsibility to coordinate development of a framework that includes protocols and model standards for information management to achieve interoperability of smart grid devices and systems…” [EISA Title XIII, Section 1305] In early 2009, responding to President Obama’s energy-related national priorities, NIST acted to accelerate progress and promote stakeholder consensus on Smart Grid interoperability standards. On April 13, NIST announced a three-phase plan to expedite development of key standards. This document is input into the first phase: engaging utilities, equipment suppliers, consumers, standards developers and other stakeholders in a participatory public process to identify applicable Smart Grid interoperability standards, gaps in currently available standards and priorities for new standardization activities. NIST awarded the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) a contract to engage Smart Grid stakeholders and develop a draft interim standards roadmap; NIST will use this document as a starting point in developing a NIST interim “roadmap” for Smart Grid interoperability standards. EPRI technical experts compiled and distilled stakeholder inputs, including technical contributions made at two EPRI-facilitated, two-day, public workshops. Other inputs include the accomplishments of six domain expert working groups established by NIST in 2008, and the cybersecurity coordination task group established in 2009. To date, hundreds of people have participated in the roadmapping process. This document contains material gathered and refined by the contractor using its technical expertise. This deliverable is not a formally reviewed and approved NIST publication. Rather, it is one of many inputs into the ongoing NIST-coordinated roadmapping process. NIST is now reviewing EPRI’s synthesis of stakeholder inputs received through the end of May 2009, as presented in this document. In addition, NIST is inviting public comment on the EPRI deliverable. A request for comments will be issued in the Federal Register. Comments can be submitted electronically to [email protected] or 1 Deliverable (7) to the National Institute of Standards and Technology under the terms of Contract No. SB1341-09-CN-0031 by mail to: George Arnold, 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8100, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8100. Along with this EPRI deliverable, NIST will review the comments received. By early fall, NIST intends to issue its Smart Grid Interoperability Standards Roadmap, which will set priorities for interoperability and cybersecurity requirements, identify an initial set of standards to support early implementation, and list plans to meet remaining standards needs. For more information, go to: http://www.nist.gov/smartgrid/ Report to NIST on the Smart Grid Interoperability Standards Roadmap (Contract No. SB1341-09-CN-0031—Deliverable 7) This document contains material gathered and refined by the Electric Power Research Institute using its technical expertise. It has been submitted as a deliverable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology under the terms of Contract No. SB1341-09-CN-0031. June 17, 2009 Prepared by the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) EPRI Project Manager Don Von Dollen DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITIES THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY THE ORGANIZATION(S) NAMED BELOW AS AN ACCOUNT OF WORK PERFORMED BY THE ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC. (EPRI). NEITHER EPRI, ANY MEMBER OF EPRI, NOR ANY PERSON ACTING ON BEHALF OF EPRI: (A) MAKES ANY WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION WHATSOEVER, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, (I) WITH RESPECT TO THE USE OF ANY INFORMATION, APPARATUS, METHOD, PROCESS, OR SIMILAR ITEM DISCLOSED IN THIS DOCUMENT, INCLUDING MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR (II) THAT SUCH USE DOES NOT INFRINGE ON OR INTERFERE WITH PRIVATELY OWNED RIGHTS, INCLUDING ANY PARTY'S INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, OR (III) THAT THIS DOCUMENT IS SUITABLE TO ANY PARTICULAR USER'S CIRCUMSTANCE; OR (B) ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY WHATSOEVER (INCLUDING ANY CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF EPRI OR ANY EPRI REPRESENTATIVE HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES) RESULTING FROM YOUR SELECTION OR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT OR ANY INFORMATION, APPARATUS, METHOD, PROCESS, OR SIMILAR ITEM DISCLOSED IN THIS DOCUMENT. ORGANIZATIONS THAT PREPARED THIS DOCUMENT Cimetrics, Inc. Cox Software Architects LLC EnerNex Corporation Hypertek, Inc. Utility Consulting International UTInnovation, LLC Xanthus Consulting International ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Draft Interim Roadmap is the result of a collaborative effort by a group of industry experts. The Project Team is comprised of: EPRI UTInnovation, LLC Sunil Chhaya Christoph Brunner Stephanie Hamilton Marco Janssen Joe Hughes Alex Apostolov Erfan Ibrahim, Ph.D. Tom Key Utility Consulting International Arindam Maitra Nokhum Markushevich Mark McGranaghan Paul Myrda Additiontional Contributors Brian Seal Ron Ambrosio, IBM Don Von Dollen Jeff Gooding, Southern California Edison Dave Hardin, Invensys EnerNex Corporation Doug Houseman, Capgemini Bobby Brown Chris Knudsen, Pacific Gas & Electric Co. Grant Gilchrist Wayne Longcore, Consumers Energy Erich Gunther Jeremy McDonald, Southern California Edison Stuart McCafferty Terry Mohn, Sempra Utilities William Moncrief Robby Simpson, Ph.D, GE Bruce Muschlitz Ron Melton, Pacific Northwest National Brad Singletary Laboratory Aaron Snyder, Ph.D. Hypertek, Inc. Marty Burns, Ph.D. Xanthus Consulting International Frances Cleveland Cox Software Architects LLC William Cox, Ph.D. TC9 Consulting Toby Considine Cimetrics, Inc. James Butler James Lee iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY President Obama has made a smart electrical grid a key element of his plan to lower energy costs for consumers, achieve energy independence and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. A smart grid would employ real-time, two-way communication technologies to allow users to connect directly with power suppliers. The development of the grid will create jobs and spur the development of innovative products that can be exported. The electricity grid can only get so smart without a framework for interoperability. This framework will identify a suite of standards that enable the integration of diverse technologies. The Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007 gave the U. S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) the “primary responsibility to coordinate development of a framework that includes protocols and model standards for information management to achieve interoperability of smart grid devices and systems…” This report provides an Interim Roadmap for the development of the Interoperability Framework. It describes the current status, issues, and priorities for interoperability standards development and harmonization. The report also describes the high-level architecture for the smart grid including a conceptual model, architectural principles and methods and cyber security strategies. A broad range of stakeholders were engaged in the development of this Interim Roadmap. Over 1000 stakeholders participated in two workshops to achieve consensus on the critical standards and standards development activities needed for the Smart grid. In section 1, this report provides a general overview of this project. In section 2, this report summarizes the efforts to date to define the smart grid and describes the ongoing governance process that will be required to develop the smart grid. Section 3 defines a conceptual model for thinking about the smart grid and its implementation. It discusses the architectural principles that will enable the smart grid to support new technologies and support new business models. One can best understand interactions between the domains through looking closely at key cross- cutting applications. Section 4 of this report introduces the applications Automated Metering Infrastructure (AMI), Demand Response (DR), Plug-In Electric Vehicles (PEV), Cyber Security, Wide Area Situation Awareness (WASA), Market Communications, and Distributed Generation and Energy Storage (DG). iv Section 5 discusses the security requirements of the smart grid. As the smart grid relies on business interactions as much as it does upon the physical processes of delivering electricity, security for the smart grid must consider interference or disruption of business communications as much as it does disruption of the delivery of electricity. Matters of identity and authorization are paramount, as are privacy and appropriate access concerns for handling personal information of customers. Section 6 presents the near-term actions that NIST can take in advancing the Interoperability Framework. The highest priority actions include: • Developing a common semantic model - NIST should work with the appropriate standards development organizations to form a common representation of information models for the smart grid • Developing a common pricing model standard - NIST should work with the relevant standards development organizations to develop an approach for developing a common pricing model to traverse the entire value chain. • Developing a common semantic model for advanced metering, demand response and electric transportation – NIST should coordinate
Recommended publications
  • GE Powerpoint Template
    GE Energy Connections Smart Grid and Beyond John D. McDonald, P.E. Smart Grid Business Development Leader – North America Global Smart Grid Strategy Group IEEE Fellow IEEE PES Substations Committee Chair 2001-2002 IEEE PES President 2006-2007 IEEE Division VII Director 2008-2009 IEEE-SA Board of Governors 2010-2011 IEEE PES Distinguished Lecturer CIGRE USNC VP, Technical Activities EMMOS User Conference September 12, 2016 1 Key Industry/Societal Trends 2 Key Industry/Societal Trends Transitioning from Devices/Systems to Holistic Solutions Success = Technology, Standards, Policy Grid Flexibility + Self Healing + Reconfigurable Electrical Power Distribution Infrastructures Resiliency Big Data, the Cloud and Use of Social Media Convergence of IT and OT to Support Enterprise Data Management 3 Smart Grid Concepts 4 Enabled A “Smarter” Grid Utility Managers ‘New Applications enabled by Additional Infrastructure’ Management “ Applications” Economic Energy Asset Demand Delivery Dispatch Optimization Optimization Optimization Optimization Enabled Consumers Control “How Power Flows” Gen & Trans Transmission Sensors Dist. Dist. Adv.Metering Mgt. Automation Mgt. Automation System Heavy Metal Old Grid “ Generate & Deliver Power” Smart Grid Adds Thermal Sub Dist Voltage Renewable Generation Lines Stations Equipment Control Generation Old Grid Smart Grid • You call when the power goes out. • Utility knows power is out and usually restores it automatically. • Utility pays whatever it takes to meet peak demand. • Utility suppresses demand at peak. Lowers cost. Reduces CAPEX. • Difficult to manage high Wind and Solar penetration • No problem with higher wind and solar penetration. • Cannot manage distributed generation safely. • Can manage distributed generation safely. • ~10% power loss in T&D • Power Loss reduced by 2+%… lowers emissions & customer bills.
    [Show full text]
  • NIST Framework and Roadmap for Smart Grid Interoperability Standards, Release 1.0
    NIST Special Publication 1108 NIST Framework and Roadmap for Smart Grid Interoperability Standards, Release 1.0 Office of the National Coordinator for Smart Grid Interoperability NIST Special Publication 1108 NIST Framework and Roadmap for Smart Grid Interoperability Standards, Release 1.0 Office of the National Coordinator for Smart Grid Interoperability January 2010 U.S. Department of Commerce Gary Locke, Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology Patrick D. Gallagher, Director Table of Contents Executive Summary........................................................................................................................ 7 1 Purpose and Scope .................................................................................................................. 13 1.1 Overview and Background............................................................................................. 13 1.2 How This Report Was Produced.................................................................................... 16 1.3 Key Concepts ................................................................................................................. 18 1.3.1 Definitions............................................................................................................... 19 1.3.2 Applications and Requirements: Eight Priority Areas............................................ 20 1.4 Content Overview .......................................................................................................... 21 2 Smart Grid Vision..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Grid Modernization: Technological Advancements Beyond Smart Grid John D
    GE Grid Solutions Grid Modernization: Technological Advancements Beyond Smart Grid John D. McDonald, P.E. Smart Grid Business Development Leader IEEE Life Fellow IEEE PES Substations Committee Chair (2001-2002) IEEE PES President (2006-2007) IEEE Division VII Director (2008-2009) IEEE-SA Board of Governors (2010-2011) IEEE PES Distinguished Lecturer (since 1999) CIGRE USNC VP, Technical Activities IEEE PES Calgary Chapter October 23, 2019 1 Brief Background BSEE (1973), MSEE (Power Engineering) (1974) - Purdue University MBA (Finance) (1978) – University of California-Berkeley 45 years full-time work experience in electric power system automation (i.e., Smart Grid) Worked for four automation system suppliers and 2 international consultants (11 years at GE) Written 100+ papers and articles, co-authored five books 48 years IEEE and IEEE PES membership (IEEE Life Fellow) Teach Smart Grid courses for GE, Georgia Tech and IEEE PES Mentor young professionals; reverse mentored for 3 years Eagle Scout; Atlanta Area Council Boy Scouts of America (AAC BSA) Board Member AAC BSA Explorer Post at GE on STEM (high school boys and girls) Married 39 years, two children, two grandchildren Work out with personal trainer for 9 years; run 5K races regularly 2 Agenda • Key Industry/Societal Trends • Smart Grid Concepts • Holistic Solutions • Integration of Microgrids and Distributed Generation • ADMS Software Applications • Types of Data • Big Data, Analytics and Enterprise Data Management • Smart Grid Standards and Interoperability • Smart Grid Deployments
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Grid 101 Presentation
    The Smart Grid is a compilation of concepts, technologies, and operating practices intended to bring the electric grid into the 21 st century. Smart Grid concepts and issues are difficult to address because they include every aspect of electric generation, distribution, and use. While the scope of smart grid covers the entire utility system from generation to how customers use energy, the three chapters in this portion of the tutorial primarily focus on the intersection between the distribution grid and customer. All elements of smart grid include important engineering, economic , and policy issues. However, with the exception of alternative generation options, the generation and transmission segments are less uncertain and more dominated by engineering economics than the distribution and customer segments. This Smart Grid 101 tutorial is divided into chapters that address significant individual technical and policy areas. Each chapter attempts to isolate and define technical and policy issues relevant to state regulators. Our objective is to more clearly define the components of Smart Grid, identify how these components interact, and then present information to clarify policy and decision options. Smart Grid is often considered confusing because it covers not only the entire electric infrastructure but also new technologies, customer interaction, legal, and regulatory issues. To address this problem, each chapter addresses a limited scope of issues derived principally from meetings with regulators, industry literature, and project team professional judgment. This set of chapters address metering, rate design, and demand response. 1 Advanced meters and Smart Meters are the most visible and tangible signs of the Smart Grid. They are installed on and affect every single customer.
    [Show full text]
  • A Security Standard for AMI Smart Meters 1
    A Security Standard for AMI Smart Meters 1 Coalton Bennett Darren Highfill Stephen B. Wicker [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Our first objective in writing this paper is to identify and Abstract-- There is a growing interest in ‘Smart Grid’ review certain communication technologies that we believe technologies in both industry and academic circles. Few attempts are critical for future demand response systems. Our second have been made to develop a written specification consummated objective is to provide a basis from which industry and with standards agreed upon by members of both coteries, due to lack of government support. Utilities in the state of California are academic participants can draw upon as a reference guide obligated, by state legislature, to create a more: efficient, reliable, when implementing, testing, and or simulating a demand and intelligent electric power system. This initiative along with response system. The components, we have chosen to include Florida Power & Lighting’s ‘Smart Grid’ pilot program has in the demand response system description, are by no means created a sense of exigency within the industry regarding smart standard components, however the UCAIug1 has considered grid technologies and standardizations. Their accomplishments these components to be an integral part of any demand are beginning to shape the policies and standards with marginal input from academic societies, ushering in a very lopsided, and response system. Even though we will reference material, business acclimatized set of standards. We will present and which has yet to be approved by an official standards body analyze, a SCE ‘Smart Grid’ use case, in which the utilities back such as IEEE, we feel confident that most utilities, many of office applications interact with the customer’s meter, and which have contributed to the development of this material, provide technical recommendations for system security will adopt a similar AMI system design if they haven’t improvements.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Networking Issues in Smart Grid a Survey of Networking Issues in Smart Grid
    12/20/13 A Survey of Networking Issues in Smart Grid A Survey of Networking Issues in Smart Grid Zheng QIN, zhengqin at wustl.edu (A project report written under the guidance of Prof. Raj Jain) Download Abstract In this paper, a survey concerning different aspects of networking in Smart Grid is presented. An application-specific network architecture for Smart Grid is introduced including its physical connection and logical connections as well as its topology. Then, various networking technologies supporting Smart Grid are described according to different scales. Some special issues on networking that Smart Grid is facing are discussed. Additionally, some aspects about management of network in Smart Grid are referred. Keywords: Smart Grid, Networking, SCADA, EMS, DMS, AMI, MDM, Smart Meters, Smart Grid management, Smart Grid security Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. Network Architecture for Smart Grid 2.1 Networking Connections 2.2 Network Topology 3. Networking Technologies 3.1 Wide Area Networking Technologies 3.2 Local Area Networking Technologies 3.3 Home Area Networking Technologies 3.4 Access Technologies 3.5 Multimedia Networking Technologies 4. Special Issues on Networking in Smart Grid 4.1 Security of Smart Grid Networking 4.2 Communication Issues 4.3 Demand Side Management 5. Management of Network in Smart Grid 5.1 Automation Systems 5.2 Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition Systems 6. Conclusion 7. List of Acronyms 8. References 1. Introduction The advent of the Smart Grid provides people with an efficient and intelligent method to manage power energy supply and consumption. Real time energy management provides the convenience, reliability and energy savings.
    [Show full text]
  • Zigbee: the New Frontier for Energy Efficiency
    ZigBee: The New Frontier for Energy Efficiency Bob Heile Chairman, ZigBee Alliance www.zigbee.org Copyright © 2008 ZigBee® Alliance. All Rights Reserved. What is ZigBee? A high level communication protocol using small, low-power digital radios based on the IEEE 802.15.4 standard for wireless networks ZigBee is targeted at RF applications that require a - Low data rate - Long battery life - Secure networking ZigBee® Alliance | Wireless Control That Simply Works 2 Copyright © 2008. All Rights Reserved. What is ZigBee? IEEE 802.22 • Open Standard WWAN IEEE 802.20 WMAN WiMax • Radio + Protocol IEEE 802.16 Range WLAN WiFi • Mesh Networking ZigBee 802.11 802.15.3 802.15.4 Bluetooth 802.15.3a 802.15.1 WPAN 802.15.3c 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 Data Rate (Mbps) • Up to 65,536 network nodes • Full Mesh Networking Support • Multiple channels in the global 2.4 GHz band and regional sub 1GHz bands Network coordinator ZigBee Router • 250Kbps data rate ZigBee End Device Communications flow Virtual links ZigBee® Alliance | Wireless Control That Simply Works 3 Copyright © 2008. All Rights Reserved. ZigBee Alliance Overview ■ Organized as an independent, neutral, nonprofit corporation in 2002 ■ Open and global ► Anyone can join and participate ► Membership is global [approx. 40% Americas, 30% EMEA, 30% Asia] ■ Activities include: ► Specification creation ► Certification and compliance programs ► Branding, market development and user education ZigBee® Alliance | Wireless Control That Simply Works 4 Copyright © 2008. All Rights Reserved. ZigBee Alliance Promoters …plus over 240 member companies from around the world ZigBee® Alliance | Wireless Control That Simply Works 5 Copyright © 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Zigbee Smart Energy
    ZigBee Smart Energy Wireless Glue Networks, Inc. John Lin [email protected] [email protected] 2009 April 24 Why am I talking to you today? Wireless Glue Networks, Inc.: > ZigBee Smart Energy Logo Certification Test Harness (validated), SE Device Simulator > ZigBee Smart Energy RF Module (ZCC-2520-M) > ZigBee Gateway/Server middleware GSF > Various development kits and modules > Java and Javascript for Smart Energy Myself: > Founder of Wireless Glue, CTO > Consultant to PG&E on Smart Energy / ZigBee > ZigBee Qualification Working Group; specification work > ZigBee / HomePlug Certification Working Group Tech Editor Regulatory Pressures driving Demand Response / Smart Energy EPACT 2005 -> ENERGY INDEPENDENCE AND SECURITY ACT 2007 TITLE XIII- SMART GRID Section 1307 States will implement PURPA: Public Utilities Regulatory Policy Act CA PUC requires implementation starting 2010: PG&E, SCE, SDG&E 2009 -> Obama Administration “Initial Implementating Guideline for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Ongoing -> NIST Interim Smart Grid Standards Interoperability Roadmap Workshop 4/28-4/29 in Washington DC NIST Interim Smart Grid Standards Interoperabiltiy Roadmap Summit 5/19- 5/20 in Washington DC System Overview Generation Distribution Grid Consumer ISO Control Demand & Control Load What PG&E is doing Silverspring Networks system being deployed by PG&E 5.3 m ZigBee radios Focus on household devices: utility owned HAN network IOU: Investor Owned Utility-- UtilityAMI openHAN requirements published in 2007 (2009 – OpenHAN, OpenSG - UCA) openHAN requirements became basis of ZigBee “Smart Energy" (SE) Application Profile ZigBee Alliance completes the Smart Energy certification program May 19, 2008 Energy Service Portals, Meters, PCT, In Home Display Itron, Landis-Gyr, Trilliant, Comverge, PRI, LSR, WGN, Tendril, Computime, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Smart Grid (Opensg) Technical Committee Plenary November 2010 Agenda
    Open Smart Grid (OpenSG) Technical Committee Plenary November 2010 Agenda 8:00am – Safety & Welcome (Chris) 8:10am – UCA Chairman’s Report (Erich) 8:20am – Logistics / Announcements (Chris) 8:30am – SEP 2.0 Update(Tobin) 8:50am – 2010 Objectives to date (Chris K) 9:00am – WG and TF plan for the week SG Communications (15min) SG Conformity (15min) SG Security (15min) SG Systems (15min) Q&A 2 Welcome & Safety Welcome & Safety CPR 911 Exits & Meeting Point UCA Chairman’s Report Erich Gunther 4 UCAIug Corporate Supporters UCAIug Corporate Supporters By Region UCAIug Corporate Supporters UCAIug Members Linear Trend Line UCAIug 2009 User Accounts By Region UCAIug Membership Composition UCAIug Budget Historic 2010 Proposed Where the Budget Goes Projected Expense Professional Fees $9,000 Customer Relations $8,000 Web Presence $103,400 Marketing $31,000 Meetings $270,816 Testing Committee $75,000 Expansion Plan to Establish Utiliy Forum $30,000 Daily Operations $267,930 Bank and Credit Card Fees $15,400 Total Projected Proposed Budget Expenditures $810,546 Projected 2009 Income Less Expenditures -$98,826 Balance brought forward from 2009 operations $150,000 Projected Balance at end of 2010 operations $51,174 Announcements Internet Information SSIDs WestinMeetingRooms WestinGuestRooms New OpenSG Simulations WG SEP 2.0 OpenSG Update Tobin Richardson Director, Smart Energy ZigBee Alliance [email protected] November 2, 2010 11 11 ZigBee Smart Energy Profile Update 1.0 Implementation & Market Support 1.x evolution 2.0 Development
    [Show full text]
  • Zigbee Security Toolsets
    SECURITY ISSUES AND VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT OF ZIGBEE ENABLED HOME AREA NETWORK IMPLEMENTATIONS A Project Presented to the faculty of the Department of Computer Science California State University, Sacramento Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Computer Science by Roger Meyer SPRING 2012 © 2012 Roger Meyer ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii SECURITY ISSUES AND VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT OF ZIGBEE ENABLED HOME AREA NETWORK IMPLEMENTATIONS A Project by Roger Meyer Approved by: __________________________________, Committee Chair Isaac Ghansah, Ph.D. __________________________________, Second Reader Martin Nicholes, Ph.D. ____________________________ Date iii Student: Roger Meyer I certify that this student has met the requirements for format contained in the University format manual, and that this project is suitable for shelving in the Library and credit is to be awarded for the project. __________________________, Graduate Coordinator ___________________ Nikrouz Faroughi, Ph.D. Date Department of Computer Science iv Abstract of SECURITY ISSUES AND VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT OF ZIGBEE ENABLED HOME AREA NETWORK IMPLEMENTATIONS by Roger Meyer Smart meters are typically equipped with a ZigBee wireless interface. ZigBee enables a customer to connect intelligent displays (called In-Home Displays, or IHD) wirelessly to the smart meter to receive real-time energy consumption data. ZigBee gives customers ways to save energy by connecting a washing machine or a fridge to the utility's current electricity price feed and adjust their time of use automatically. Although currently all smart meters have the wireless interface disabled, the utilities are starting to enable it for pilot users. However, this new wireless functionality comes with security risks. This project is about the analysis of security and privacy issues of ZigBee implementations.
    [Show full text]
  • Home Area Network: Architectural Considerations for Rapid Innovation
    Home Area Network: Architectural Considerations for Rapid Innovation WHITE PAPER Trilliant helps leading utilities and energy retailers achieve their smart grid visions through the Trilliant Communications Platform, the only communications platform purpose-built for the energy industry that integrates disparate systems of systems into a unified whole. The Trilliant Platform is deployed with more than 200 utilities worldwide to enhance energy efficiency, improve grid reliability, lower operating costs, integrate renewable energy resources and electric vehicles, and empower consumers to better manage their energy consumption. 1100 Island Drive Redwood City, CA 94065 t 650-204-5050 f 650-508-8096 www.trilliantinc.com Introduction Two recent reports published by ON World, a research firm providing business intelligence on smart technology markets, predict that 100 million smart meters will be deployed in the next five years and that half of these will have a built‐in Home‐Area Network (HAN) gateway for in‐home energy management programs and services. ON World’s survey of 77 utilities in the United States also found that 21% are planning to integrate a HAN gateway into every smart meter deployed.1 The question addressed in this white paper is whether or not this integration of the HAN gateway function into the smart meter is a smart architecture for the Smart Grid? Before examining the architectural alternatives for the HAN gateway, some background information is provided in the next two sections on The HAN’s Value in the Smart Grid and HAN Architectures in Existing Standards. The two viable HAN gateway architectures (integration into the smart meter and the dedicated in‐home gateway device) are then evaluated in detail using four criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • NIST Framework and Roadmap for Smart Grid Interoperability Standards, Release 1.0
    NIST Special Publication 1108 NIST Framework and Roadmap for Smart Grid Interoperability Standards, Release 1.0 Office of the National Coordinator for Smart Grid Interoperability NIST Special Publication 1108 NIST Framework and Roadmap for Smart Grid Interoperability Standards, Release 1.0 Office of the National Coordinator for Smart Grid Interoperability January 2010 U.S. Department of Commerce Gary Locke, Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology Patrick D. Gallagher, Director Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 7 1 Purpose and Scope .................................................................................................................. 13 1.1 Overview and Background ............................................................................................. 13 1.2 How This Report Was Produced .................................................................................... 16 1.3 Key Concepts ................................................................................................................. 18 1.3.1 Definitions............................................................................................................... 19 1.3.2 Applications and Requirements: Eight Priority Areas ............................................ 20 1.4 Content Overview .......................................................................................................... 21 2 Smart Grid Vision
    [Show full text]