DOCSLIB.ORG

ILA Annual Conference 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ILA Annual Conference 2021 ILA Annual Conference 2021 Delegate and Speaker List First Name Last Name Organisation Caoimhe Kennedy Akin Gump LLP Emma Simmonds Akin Gump LLP Lauren Pflueger Akin Gump LLP Lois Deasey Akin Gump LLP Ella Richards Allen & Overy LLP Harini Viswanathan Allen & Overy LLP Jennifer Marshall Allen & Overy LLP Lucy Aconley Allen & Overy LLP Musonda Mutati Allen & Overy LLP Nicola Ferguson Allen & Overy LLP Kathleen Garrett Arthur Cox Drew Sainsbury Ashurst Giles Boothman Ashurst Inga West Ashurst Maria Staiano-Kolaitis Ashurst Rebecca James Ashurst Richard Bulmore Ashurst Sonya Van De Graaff Avonhurst Eric Baijal BBM Solicitors Ltd Phil De Vries BCLP Fraser Campbell Blackstone Chambers Neil Pigott Boies Schiller Flexner (UK) LLP Laurence Raeburn-Smith British Property Federation Jamie Nellany Brodies LLP Ben Alexander Clifford Chance LLP Chris Norman Clifford Chance LLP Gabrielle Ruiz Clifford Chance LLP Sabrina Brecher Clifford Chance LLP Tim Bennett Clifford Chance LLP William Steel Clifford Chance LLP Julian Turner CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP Kelly Rothwell CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP Council Of Legal Education, Norman Manley Law Eulalie Greenaway School Adam Plainer Dechert LLP Christopher Horrocks Dechert LLP Anna Hughes Deloitte Clare Boardman Deloitte First Name Last Name Organisation Phil Nicholls Deloitte Tessa Blank Dentons UK & Middle East LLP Fiona Todd Enterprise Chambers Jennifer Meech Enterprise Chambers Taylor Dewar Ernst & Young Parthenon Alex Rogan Eversheds Sutherland Carl Allen Eversheds Sutherland Max Morrison Eversheds Sutherland David Gray Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP Joanne Rumley Foot Anstey LLP Catherine Balmond Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP Katharina Crinson Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP Ken Baird Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP Lindsay Hingston Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP Richard Layther Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP Sally Montague Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP William Snowden Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP Juliette Challenger GLAS Mia Drennan GLAS Natasha Chan GLAS Simon Thomas Goodwin Procter (UK) LLP Mr Justice Segal Grand Court, Cayman Islands and Erskine Chambers Simon Passfield Guildhall Chambers Joe Bannister Hogan Lovells International LLP Jonathan Middleton ILA Katharine Theobald ILA Yushan Ng ILA Andrew Shore Insolvency Service Paul Bannister Insolvency Service Steven Chown Insolvency Service Jean Rossi JR Legal Services Limited Chief ICC Judge Briggs Mr Justice Zacaroli Mr Justice Snowden Eleanor Temple Kings Chambers Lydia Tsioli King's College London Kate Stephenson Kirkland & Ellis Lisa Stevens Kirkland & Ellis International LLP First Name Last Name Organisation Zoe Stembridge Kirkland & Ellis International LLP Chris Stevenson Linklaters LLP Daniel Nutley Linklaters LLP Euan Clarke Linklaters LLP Gregory Wloch Linklaters LLP Jack Colthurst Linklaters LLP Madeline Chan Linklaters LLP Max Krasner Linklaters LLP Paul Sidle Linklaters LLP Rory Conway Linklaters LLP Slavena Sarbeva Linklaters LLP Blanca Mamutse Liverpool John Moores Law School Natalie Wilson Lloyds Banking Group Sarah Paterson London School of Econimics Catherine Addy QC Maitland Chambers Christian La-Roda Thomas Maples Group Fraser Mitchell Maples Group Nick Herrod Maples Group Prof. Dr. Madaus Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg Stephan Alex Wood Mayer Brown International LLP Devi Shah Mayer Brown International LLP Jacqueline Ingram Milbank LLP Lynette Janssen Milbank LLP Barbara Rumora-Scheltema NautaDutilh Stephen Gwaza Nottingham Law School Paula Moffatt Nottingham Law School, Nottingham Trent University Alexandra Kastrinou Nottingham Trent University Rebecca Parry Nottingham Trent University Jeremy Snead Ogier Crispin Daly Paul Hastings (Europe) LLP David Ereira Paul Hastings (Europe) LLP Mei Lian Paul Hastings (Europe) LLP Priya Narang Paul Hastings (Europe) LLP Nick Pike Pike Restructurings Mark Sands Quantuma Hamish Patrick Shepherd and Wedderburn LLP Evelyn Fleming Slaughter and May Ian Johnson Slaughter and May First Name Last Name Organisation Megan Sparber Slaughter and May Felicity Toube QC South Square Mark Phillips QC South Square Tom Smith QC South Square Daniel Bayfield QC South Square Glen Davis QC South Square Riz Mokal South Square Stefanie Wilkins South Square Kelly Singer Squire Patton Boggs Rachael Markham Squire Patton Boggs Georgette Ellis Student Tessa Durham TLT LLP Kathryn Ramsden tPR Mike Birch tPR Harry Tait UCL Laws Juan Jose Gonzalez Antequera Universidad Autonoma de Madrid Nigel Furey University of Bristol Professor Keay University of Leeds Andrew John Tribe University of Liverpool Irit Mevorach University of Nottingham Peter Walton University of Wolverhampton Jane Garvin Ward Hadaway Solicitors Mark Lawford Weil, Gotshal & Manges (London) LLP Matt Benson Weil, Gotshal & Manges (London) LLP Tayyibah Arif Weil, Gotshal & Manges (London) LLP David Pollard Wilberforce Chambers Alexander Roy Willkie Farr & Gallagher (UK) LLP Jason Taylor Willkie Farr & Gallagher (UK) LLP .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Court Fees the Government Response to Consultation on Proposals to Reform Fees for Grants of Probate
    Court Fees The Government Response to consultation on proposals to reform fees for grants of probate February 2017 Court Fees The Government response to consultation on proposals to reform fees for grants of probate Presented to Parliament by the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice by Command of Her Majesty February 2017 Cm 9426 © Crown copyright 2017 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government- licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at: Court & Tribunal Fees Policy, Post Point 3.38, Ministry of Justice, 102 Petty France, SW1H 9AJ. Email: [email protected] Print ISBN 9781474141253 Web ISBN 9781474141260 ID 21021711 02/17 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Court Fees | The Government Response to consultation on proposals to reform fees for grants of probate Contents Introduction 3 Chapter 1 – Summary of Responses 5 Chapter 2 – Conclusions and Next Steps 10 Chapter 3 – Equalities Statement 14 Annex A: List of respondents 15 1 Court Fees | The Government Response to consultation on proposals to reform fees for grants of probate 2 Court Fees | The Government Response to consultation on proposals to reform fees for grants of probate Introduction 1.
    [Show full text]
  • JUSTICE Human Rights Law Conference 2018 10 October 2018, London
    JUSTICE Human Rights Law Conference 2018 10 October 2018, London • Unmissable human rights CPD event for 2018 • Keynote speeches from leaders in the field • Workshops on criminal justice, women’s human rights, earn judicial review, immigration and asylum, privacy, security and 6 cpd surveillance and life, death and human rights hours • The latest domestic and international human rights case-law • All income supports the work of JUSTICE Plenary speeches from: Panel sessions with: • Lord Carnwath of Notting Hill • Michael Fordham QC • Karon Monaghan QC • Harriet Wistrich • Angela Rafferty QC • Baroness Shami Chakrabarti • Nathalie Lieven QC • Max Hill QC • + many others to be confirmed follow us on twitter @justicehq PROGRAMME OF THE DAY Join JUSTICE 9.00 REGISTRATION AND REFRESHMENTS JUSTICE is an all-party law reform and human rights organisation working to strengthen the justice system – administrative, civil and 9.30 CHAIR’S WELCOME criminal – in the United Kingdom. Andrea Coomber, Director, JUSTICE 9.45 MORNING KEYNOTE ADDRESS: JUSTICE is independent JUSTICE is expert JUSTICE is influential Lord Carnwath of Notting Hill 10.15 REVIEW OF THE YEAR JUSTICE is effective JUSTICE is international Karon Monaghan QC, Matrix Chambers 11.00 COFFEE JUSTICE relies on the support of its members and donors for the funds to carry out its vital work. Please join us today. 11.30 MORNING WORKSHOPS 1. Criminal Justice and Human Rights 14.00 AFTERNOON WORKSHOPS “Access to justice, human rights and the rule of law – as a lawyer and as a Chair: HH Peter Rook QC democrat, I can think of few causes more important to defend and extend.
    [Show full text]
  • High Court Judgment Template
    Neutral Citation Number: [2020] EWHC 235 (Ch) INGENIOUS LITIGATION Claim Nos: HC-2015-002715, HC-2015-004581 HC-2017-000490, BL-2018-000279 BL-2018-001466, BL-2018-002554 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS OF ENGLAND AND WALES BUSINESS LIST (ChD) Rolls Building, Royal Courts of Justice Fetter Lane, London, EC4A 1NL Date: 10 February 2020 Before : MR JUSTICE NUGEE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between : MR NIGEL ROWE & Others Claimants - and - INGENIOUS MEDIA HOLDINGS PLC & Others Defendants Claim Nos: HC-2015-004561, HC-2016-001674 HC-2017-001049, BL-2018-000507 And Between : MR ANTHONY BARNESS & Others Claimants - and - INGENIOUS MEDIA LTD & Others Defendants Claim No: FS-2017-000005 And Between : MR THOMAS AHEARNE & Others Claimants - and - PATRICK ANTHONY McKENNA & Others Defendants - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Nicholas Bacon QC (instructed by Stewarts Law LLP and Peters & Peters Solicitors LLP) for the Stewarts Claimants and the Peters & Peters Claimants P J Kirby QC (instructed by Stewarts Law LLP, Peters & Peters Solicitors LLP and Therium) for the Stewarts Claimants, the Peters & Peters Claimants and Therium Tom Mountford (instructed by Mishcon de Reya LLP) for the Mishcon de Reya Claimants Simon Birt QC, Craig Morrison and Geoffrey Kuehne (instructed by RPC) for the Ingenious Defendants Ben Quiney QC and Carlo Taczalski (instructed by Kennedys Law LLP) for SRLV (a firm) James Duffy and Nick Daly (instructed by Herbert Smith Freehills LLP)
    [Show full text]
  • Partner Moves January - February
    Lateral Partner Moves in London January - February 2018 REPRESENTATION – SEARCH – TEAM MOVES www.edwardsgibson.com Welcome to the latest round up of lateral partner moves in the legal market from Edwards Gibson where we look back at announced partner-level recruitment activity in London over the past two months and give you a ‘who’s moved where’ update. In all there was a total of 91 lateral partner moves announced in this round up – 22% down on the same period last year when the figures were artificially buoyed by the collapse of King & Wood Mallesons’ European verein. Although fewer than the preceding two years, the number of moves in this edition corresponds almost exactly to the statistical average over the same period for the past 5 years (see graph below). Lateral Partner Moves January - February 2014 2014.5 2015 2015.5 2016 2016.5 2017 2017.5 2018 140 140 120 120 100 100 80 80 60 60 40 40 20 20 No. of Partner Moves 0 0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Year Mean No. of Moves 2014 - 2018 in the January - February Period A total of 7 firms hired three or more partners in the first two months of this year. Surprisingly, the most prolific recruiter was the traditionally ultra conservative all equity White Shoe firm Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy. Milbank snared a full half-dozen new partners – comprising a four-partner restructuring and corporate team, and a two-partner high yield US capital markets team - from fellow New Yorkers Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft and Shearman & Sterling. Top partner recruiters in London January-February 2018 • Milbank Tweed 6 • K&L Gates 4 • Charles Russell Speechlys 4 • Brown Rudnick 3 • Fieldfisher 3 • Osborne Clarke 3 • Simmons & Simmons 3 REPRESENTATION – SEARCH – TEAM MOVES www.edwardsgibson.com So, an interesting, but not dramatic, start to the New Year.
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday 11 November 2015 the Great Hall 1.00Pm–3.30Pm
    This fair guide has been produced in association with Edgbaston, Birmingham, Wednesday 11 November 2015 B15 2TT, United Kingdom www.birmingham.ac.uk 11375 © University of Birmingham 2015. Printed on a recycled grade paper containing 100% post-consumer waste The Great Hall 1.00pm–3.30pm 11375 Careers Fair - Law Fair Cover_AW.indd 1-2 14/09/2015 14:19 Welcome to the Careers Network Law Fair. This event aims to provide Careers Network has a you with the opportunity to meet high quality employers face to face host of useful resources and discuss employment opportunities for vacation schemes and training contracts for 2017. information n ideas n vacancies n guidance n skills training Information p On occupations, employer research, further study, a year out, CV writing, completing applications, and much more Advice and guidance appointments Our Careers Advisers offer a arrange of appointments to provide careers support including: p General careers advice p CV checks p Practice Interviews These can be booked via Careers Connect at intranet.birmingham.ac.uk/careersconnect Employer presentations and workshops To help you through the recruitment process, come to our activity based sessions that will improve your confidence and performance, as well as help you research your ideas and make career-decisions. Sessions include: Interviews, Assessment Centres, Career Planning, Personal development training workshops, as well as Occupational and Industry specific events. Employer presentations during the Autumn term also provide an opportunity to meet employers and hear about what they can offer you. Visit our website at intranet.birmingham.ac.uk/careers for p News – all the latest happenings and updates p Vacancies p Employer events and career fairs Individually brilliant, p Links to employers and searchable databases of information collectively extraordinary p Sign up for events and workshops Offi ces worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Affidavit-Other
    10-PR-16-46 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 8/11/2021 3:24 PM STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF CARVER FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT PROBATE DIVISION In the Matter of: Court File No. lO-PR-16-46 Judge Kevin W. Eide Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson, DECLARATION OF STEVEN MARK Decedent. TREGEAR I, Steven Mark Tregear, declare and state as follows: 1. I am a partner at Russells, a law firm located in London, United Kingdom I am the head of the litigation department at Russells and have been practicing law for more than 30 years. I specialize in representing clients in the entertainment industry, including major record and music publishing companies, artists, and athletes. Russells serves as counsel for Comerica Bank & Trust, N.A. (“Comerica”), the Personal Representative of the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson (the “Estate”) in the United Kingdom, including in connection with the Estate’s dispute with Warner Chappell Music Italiana S.r.1. (“Warner Chappell”) and related parties. I am the lead attorney representing the Estate in the U.K. 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A are true and correct copies of the detailed ledgers underlying the invoices that were submitted to the Court by Comerica as Exhibit H to the June 30, 2021 Declaration of Mark Greiner. The initials of each time keeper billing time to the Estate is in the third column, under fee earner. “ST” is me, “RV” is my c01porate transactions partner Ryan 10-PR-16-46 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 8/11/2021 3:24 PM Vince, “AR” is Alice Rudge, a more junior litigation solicitor in our office, and “WC” is William Cameron, a trainee solicitor in our office.
    [Show full text]
  • Addleshaw Goddard Hong Kong Training Contract
    Addleshaw Goddard Hong Kong Training Contract politicizesJotham volatilize very allopathically. irrelevantly ifFowler equipotent barricadoes Stacy pup off-the-record. or overtook. Lozenged Humphrey queers her knurs so extrinsically that Lincoln Y Law enforcement training facility successfully protests U Constitution the law field said. Addleshaw Goddard has appointed David Kirchin as worth of Scotland for software firm. Burges Salmon Osborne Clarke and Addleshaw Goddard have advised. Lawyer salary Which training contracts pay the benefit The Tab. Csr events for hong kong high in addleshaw goddard hong kong training contract for hong kong the addleshaw goddard, employment are an indonesian local and try again or go through an application stands out and! Department who State's vegetable of marital contract for training and exportation of. Can be in hong kong and train in the contracts and communications; it is always adequately equipped, enabling push them. Tokyo hong kong beijing melbourne sydney Sullivan Cromwell. Each year research firm receives around 2000 vacation advice and direct training contract applications combined At said initial application stage an HR source tells us. Ashurst News Analysis and Updates Page 1 of 25 Legal. CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang and Addleshaw Goddard are among. Ropes Gray has launched its debut Tokyo training contract program in. Salary London 400 pw Salary Hong Kong 2500 HKD pw Location London. 23 Norton Rose Fulbright Addleshaw Goddard Mishcon de Reya and HFW. Giles qualified as a solicitor with Addleshaw Goddard in Manchester and. Lawyers from the Hong Kong offices of Clifford Chance Herbert Smith. Dec 03 2020 Applying for a training contract at Gowling WLG.
    [Show full text]
  • CLLS Reg Law Committee
    Minutes of Meeting of the City of London Law Society Regulatory Law Committee (the "Committee") Held on Tuesday 8 October 2019 at 12.30pm at Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Exchange House, 12 Primrose Street, London, EC2A 2EG ATTENDEES Present Firm Represented Karen Anderson (Chair) Herbert Smith Freehills LLP Peter Bevan Linklaters LLP Simon Crown Clifford Chance LLP Richard Everett Travers Smith LLP Angela Hayes TLT LLP Mark Kalderon Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP Brian McDonnell Addleshaw Goddard LLP Hannah Meakin Norton Rose Fulbright LLP Rob Moulton Latham & Watkins LLP Stuart Willey White & Case LLP 1. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 10 September 2019 were approved. 2. HMT CALL FOR EVIDENCE ON THE FINANCIAL SERVICES FUTURE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK REVIEW (REGULATORY CO-ORDINATION) Further to the September meeting, a member had been in contact with IRSG to discuss its response to this paper. It was agreed that the outcomes of the discussion would be fed back to the Committee. It was agreed that a member would prepare a draft response setting out the Committee's views, which, if appropriate, would reflect the discussions being held with the IRSG. The members confirmed that they had no specific points to raise on the substance of the paper and were supportive of the aims of the review. 3. LAW COMMISSION CALL FOR EVIDENCE ON INTERMEDIATED SECURITIES The member who had considered this paper in more detail following the September meeting presented the issues which appeared of most relevance to the Committee. The Committee discussed the question considering whether insolvency in an intermediated securities chain should be considered from a legal rather than regulatory perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • PRIVACY NOTICE for MENTORING SCHEME 1. One Essex Court, Brick
    PRIVACY NOTICE FOR MENTORING SCHEME 1. One Essex Court, Brick Court Chambers, Blackstone Chambers, Essex Court Chambers, Fountain Court Chambers and 3VB (“Chambers”) are data controllers for the purposes of processing mentoring scheme applicants’ data. 2. This policy applies in relation to any application for the mentoring scheme at the participating Chambers and during the course of a mentorship. The General Data Protection Regulation (the “GDPR”) requires us to provide this notice to you. COLLECTION OF PERSONAL DATA 3. Personal data processed and collected by us includes: a. personal data collected during the application process or during the course of the mentoring relationship, or from any further correspondence by phone, email or otherwise; b. personal data collected by and on behalf of the participating Chambers to enable us to process payments to mentees; c. personal data received via the centralized application process; and d. personal data collected from third parties in the course of taking references in support of an application. We will seek information from third parties with your consent only. 4. The personal data collected includes any personal details including name, address, contact details, education and training, employment, right to work in the UK and financial information where relevant. 5. Sensitive personal data collected with your consent may include information about medical or health conditions, including whether or not you have a disability for which Chambers needs to make reasonable adjustments; and information about your racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, trade union membership, sex life and sexual orientation and religion or philosophical belief. WHY WE PROCESS PERSONAL DATA 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Discussion Paper on Heritable Securities: Pre-Default
    (DISCUSSION PAPER No.168) Discussion Paper on Heritable Securities: Pre-default discussion paper Discussion Paper on Heritable Securities: Pre-default June 2019 DISCUSSION PAPER No 168 This Discussion Paper is published for comment and criticism and does not represent the final views of the Scottish Law Commission NOTES 1. Please note that information about this Discussion Paper, including copies of responses, may be made available in terms of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002. Any confidential response will be dealt with in accordance with the 2002 Act. We may also (i) publish responses on our website (either in full or in some other way such as re-formatted or summarised); and (ii) attribute comments and publish a list of respondents' names. 2. Where possible, we would prefer electronic submission of comments. A downloadable electronic response form for this paper as well as a general comments form are available on our website. Alternatively, our general email address is [email protected]. 3. Please note that all hyperlinks in this document were checked for accuracy at the time of final draft. 4. If you have any difficulty in reading this document, please contact us and we will do our best to assist. You may wish to note that the pdf version of this document available on our website has been tagged for accessibility. 5. © Crown copyright 2019 You may re-use this publication (excluding logos and any photographs) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0. To view this licence visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3; or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 4DU; or email [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • For Release After 12Pm Wednesday 27 July 2011 Pro
    FOR RELEASE AFTER 12PM WEDNESDAY 27 JULY 2011 PRO BONO LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES NAMED FOR LONDON 2012 OLYMPIC AND PARALYMIC GAMES With exactly one year to go until the opening of the Games, Sport Resolutions, The Bar Council, Law Society and the British Association of Sport and Law have today announced the names of the 17 solicitors' firms and barristers’ chambers and the 19 individual advocates who have been appointed to the London 2012 Pro Bono Legal Advice and Representation Service. The final lists were selected from over 150 applications from members of the UK legal profession who offered their services during the Games. The Service is being established at the request of the London Organising Committee of the Olympic and Paralympic Games. It assembles solicitors, barristers and individual practitioners to provide free legal advice and representation from 9 July to 12 September 2012 for accredited athletes, coaches, team officials, National Olympic Committees, National Paralympic Committees and International Federations. A general service covering six areas of law is to be offered along with a sports advocacy service for athletes appearing before the ad hoc division of the International Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) which sits during the period of the Games. The Service is being managed by Sport Resolutions, the specialist independent dispute service, with appointments made by a Selection Committee made up of representatives from the Bar Council, Law Society and the British Association of Sport and Law. GENERAL SECTION Firm/Chambers
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of COVID-19 Measures on the Civil Justice System – Appendices
    Report and recommendations The impact of COVID-19 measures on the civil justice system – Appendices Dr Natalie Byrom Sarah Beardon Dr Abby Kendrick May 2020 Table of Contents APPENDIX A- LIST OF RESPONDENTS TO CONSULTATION INBOX ................................................ 2 A. GROUP RESPONSES...................................................................................................................................................... 2 B. INDIVIDUAL RESPONSES ............................................................................................................................................ 3 APPENDIX B: LITERATURE REVIEW: THE IMPACT OF THE RAPID EXPANSION OF REMOTE HEARINGS IN THE CIVIL JUSTICE SYSTEM........................................................................... 4 APPENDIX C: UNDERSTANDING THE WORK CONDUCTED IN THE COUNTY COURTS DURING COVID-19 ............................................................................................................................................ 14 APPENDIX D: CODING CATEGORIES FOR TYPES OF HEARING ...................................................... 17 APPENDIX E: SUMMARY OF REGRESSION ANALYSIS AND TECHNICAL OUTPUTS .................. 18 APPENDIX F: SUMMARY OF REMOTE PUBLIC CONSULTATION MEETING ................................ 25 DIGITAL INEQUALITY .........................................................................................................................................................25 DOES A REMOTE HEARING GIVE YOU A ‘DAY IN COURT’? .............................................................................................25
    [Show full text]