DOCSLIB.ORG

Characterization of Mine Leachates and the Development of a Ground-Water Monitoring Strategy for Mine Sites EPA/600/R-99/007 February 1999

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Characterization of Mine Leachates and the Development of a Ground-Water Monitoring Strategy for Mine Sites EPA/600/R-99/007 February 1999 United States Office of Research and EPA/600/R-99/007 Environmental Protection Development February 1999 Agency Washington, D.C. 20460 Characterization of Mine Leachates and the Development of a Ground-Water Monitoring Strategy for Mine Sites EPA/600/R-99/007 February 1999 Characterization of Mine Leachates and the Development of a Ground-Water Monitoring Strategy for Mine Sites by Russell H. Plumb, Jr. Lockheed Martin Services Group Las Vegas, Nevada Contract Number 68-C5-0091 Project Officer Larry A. Eccles National Environmental Research Laboratory U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Las Vegas, Nevada Notice Although the research described in this report was supported by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, through its Office of Research and Development, it has not been subjected to Agency policy review and therefore does not necessarily reflect the views of the Agency. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. ii Acknowledgment This work was conducted under Work Assignments 224-20320 and LV4-20320 of Contract No. 68-C5- 0091 between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency National Environmental Research Laboratory and the Lockheed Martin Services Group, Las Vegas, Nevada. The EPA Work Assignment Manager on this task was Larry A. Eccles. The monitoring records for Nevada heap leaching facilities were obtained from the Bureau of Mining Regulation and Reclamation, Nevada Department of Environmental Protection. The assistance and cooperation of Douglas Zimmerman and Matt McAuliffe in obtaining this information is acknowledged and appreciated. The monitoring records for Arizona copper mining facilities were obtained from the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality. The assistance and cooperation of Charles Graf, Michael Wood, and Gregory Olsen is acknowledged and appreciated. The assistance of Gregory Raab in compiling and reviewing some of the Arizona copper mine data is also acknowledged. iii Table of Contents Page Notice ......................................................................... ii Acknowledgment ................................................................iii Table of Contents ................................................................iv List of Figures ................................................................. vii List of Tables .................................................................. xv 1.0 Introduction ...............................................................1-1 2.0 Data Collection ............................................................2-1 2.1 Data Sources ..........................................................2-1 2.2 Data Compilation .......................................................2-3 2.3 Quality Assurance Considerations .........................................2-4 2.3.1 Accuracy Data Quality Objective ....................................2-4 2.3.2 Precision Data Quality Objectives ....................................2-5 2.3.3 Completeness Data Quality Objective .................................2-7 2.3.4 Comparability Data Quality Objective .................................2-7 3.0 Chemical Composition of Mine Waste Leachates ..................................3-1 3.1 Heap Leaching Process Solution ...........................................3-1 3.2 Meteoric Water Mobility Test Leachates ....................................3-6 3.3 Tailings Ponds at Copper Mines ...........................................3-9 3.4 Summary .............................................................3-9 4.0 Characterizing Solution Compositions Using Multiple-ion Fingerprint Patterns ..........4-1 4.1 Stiff Diagrams as a Multivariate Characterization Technique ....................4-2 4.2 Characterization of Incinerated Municipal Waste Ash Leachates .................4-2 4.3 Application to Mine Waste Leachate Characterization .........................4-10 4.4 Stiff Diagram Modifications .............................................4-10 4.5 Summary ............................................................4-11 5.0 Assessment of Monitoring Results From Gold Heap Leaching Facilities in Nevada .......5-1 5.1 Description of Heap Leaching Process ......................................5-1 5.2 Fingerprinting Heap Leaching Process Solutions ..............................5-3 5.2.1 Lone Tree Gold Mine ..............................................5-4 iv 5.2.2 Green Springs Gold Mine ......................................... 5-14 5.2.3 Alligator Ridge Mine ............................................. 5-20 5.2.4 Oliver Hills Mine ................................................ 5-25 5.2.5 Barrick Goldstrike Mine .......................................... 5-30 5.2.6 Rabbit Creek Mine ............................................... 5-41 5.2.7 Aurora Partnership Mine .......................................... 5-48 5.2.8 Cortez Gold Mine ............................................... 5-54 5.2.9 Florida Canyon Mine ............................................. 5-70 5.2.10 Alta Gold Mine ................................................. 5-77 5.2.11 Hycroft Gold Mine .............................................. 5-84 5.2.12 Paradise Peaks Mine ............................................. 5-90 5.2.13 First Miss Getchell Gold Mine ..................................... 5-95 5.2.14 Arimetco Gold Mine ............................................ 5-101 5.2.15 Nevada Goldfield Sleeper Mine ................................... 5-108 5.2.16 Corona Gold Mine .............................................. 5-116 5.2.17 Bullfrog Gold Mine ............................................. 5-118 5.2.18 Marigold Gold Mine ............................................ 5-124 5.2.19 Chimney Creek Gold Mine ....................................... 5-127 5.2.20 Bald Mountain Gold Mine ........................................ 5-136 5.2.21 American Eagle Flowery Mine .................................... 5-142 5.2.22 Other Heap Leaching Sites ....................................... 5-146 5.3 Discussion of Heap Leaching Case Studies ................................ 5-147 5.4 Heap Leaching Summary .............................................. 5-153 6.0 Assessment of Monitoring Results From Tailings Basins at Arizona Copper Mines ...... 6-1 6.1 Twin Butte Copper Mine ................................................ 6-1 6.1.1 Tailings Leachate Characterization ................................... 6-2 6.1.2 Laboratory Column Studies ......................................... 6-7 6.1.3 Field Monitoring Results ........................................... 6-8 6.1.4 Twin Butte Summary ............................................. 6-26 6.2 Phelps-Dodge Tailings Disposal Area ..................................... 6-27 6.2.1 Characterization of Phelps-Dodge Tailings Leachate .................... 6-28 6.2.2 Assessment of Ground-Water Conditions ............................. 6-37 6.2.3 Assessment of Surface Water Conditions ............................. 6-44 6.2.4 Phelps-Dodge Tailings Disposal Area Summary ....................... 6-49 6.3 Cyprus Sierrita Copper Mine ............................................ 6-49 6.3.1 Tailings Leachate Characterization .................................. 6-51 6.3.2 Ground-Water Monitoring Results .................................. 6-51 6.3.3 Cyprus Sierrita Summary .......................................... 6-52 6.4 Zonia Copper Mine .................................................... 6-57 6.4.1 Background Ground-Water Conditions ............................... 6-57 6.4.2 Downgradient Ground-Water Conditions ............................. 6-57 6.4.3 Zonia Summary ................................................. 6-58 6.5 Discussion of Copper Mine Case Studies ................................... 6-59 6.6 Arizona Copper Mines Summary ......................................... 6-67 v 7.0 Development of a Ground-Water Monitoring Strategy for Mining Facilities .............7-1 7.1 Background ...........................................................7-1 7.2 Need for Monitoring ....................................................7-1 7.3 Monitoring Parameter Criteria ............................................7-3 7.4 Proposed Monitoring Strategy .............................................7-9 7.5 Implementation of Proposed Monitoring Strategy ............................7-11 7.5.1 Phase I. Source Characterization ....................................7-12 7.5.2 Detection Monitoring .............................................7-14 7.5.3 Assessment Monitoring ...........................................7-15 7.5.4 Corrective Action ................................................7-16 7.6 Discussion ...........................................................7-16 7.7 Summary ............................................................7-22 8.0 Summary ...............................................................8-1 9.0 References ...............................................................9-1 vi List of Figures Figure Number/Description Page 3-1 Composite process solution monitoring results ................................... 3-3 3-2 Composite Meteoric Water Mobility Test leaching results ......................... 3-8 3-3 Composite monitoring results from copper mine tailings basins .................... 3-11 4-1 Example of Stiff Diagram used to characterize the composition of mine waste leachates .. 4-2 4-2 Examples of characteristic nonpoint source fingerprints identified by Rahn et al. (1995) .. 4-3 4-3 Characteristic multivariant fingerprint
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Public Trust: Application of the Public Trust Doctrine to Groundwater Resources
    TRUSTING THE PUBLIC TRUST: APPLICATION OF THE PUBLIC TRUST DOCTRINE TO GROUNDWATER RESOURCES Jack Tuholske∗ TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ...................................................................................................190 I. An Overview of Groundwater Problems in the United States...............193 A. Running Low in the High Plains .....................................................193 B. A Garden in the Wilderness.............................................................195 C. Land Subsidence...............................................................................197 D. Natural Resource Extraction............................................................198 E. Bottled Water: Groundwater as a Consumer Commodity .............200 F. Saltwater Intrusion: The Sea Cometh..............................................201 G. Reduced Surface Flows ...................................................................202 H. Groundwater Depletion: A Pervasive Nationwide Problem .........203 II. A Brief Overview of Groundwater Law ................................................204 A. Common Law Applied to Groundwater .........................................205 B. Statutory Overlays............................................................................211 III. The Public Trust and Groundwater.......................................................214 A. Brief Historical Overview of the Public Trust Doctrine................214 B. New Applications of the Public Trust Doctrine .............................216 IV. Groundwater
    [Show full text]
  • Nevada Gold Mines - Cortez Mine
    CASE STUDY Vigilante Air Quality Station™ Return safely and quicker to the face. Vigilante AQS™ Case Study at Nevada Gold Mines - Cortez Mine stations, to measure environmental conditions in real-time for worker health and safety and to reduce the total installed infrastructure costs. Nevada Gold Mines is a joint venture between Barrick (61.5%) and Newmont CorPoration (38.5%), creating the single largest gold-Producing comPlex in the world. The mining oPeration comPrises eight mines along with their associated infrastructure and Processing facilities. Nevada Gold Mines is oPerated by Barrick. Cortez Gold Mine is a located aPProximately 75 miles (120 km) southwest of Elko, Nevada, USA. The Cortez Hills Underground Mine (CHUG) is fully The Challenge mechanized, with large scale equiPment using a combination of cut and fill mining with cemented Underground mines have challenging backfill and Primary and secondary longhole environmental conditions, including toxic gases stoPing with cemented and uncemented backfill. from blasting, oPerating vehicles and/or gases given off by the surrounding strata rock. At greater Identifying the mining industry’s demand for real- dePths, the air is denser and continues to Pick uP time data to monitor and control air quality, Maestro heat from the exposed rock causing worker heat Digital Mine worked with CorteZ Mine to address stress concerns. the challenges associated with working in the harsh underground mining environment by protecting Nevada Gold Mines goal is to make its oPerations miners from acute or chronic gas related health as safe and efficient as Possible, at the lowest conditions. Nevada Gold Mines integrated Maestro Possible cost.
    [Show full text]
  • Newmont Mining Corporation Reduction of Conflict in The
    Draft Final Report to Newmont Mining Corporation Reduction of Conflict in the Extractive Industries Using Good Neighbor Agreements by Alexandra Masaitis Glenn C. Miller Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Science University of Nevada, Reno August, 2015 i Glenn C. Miller Alexandra Masaitis Reduction of conflicts in the extractive industries using Good Neighbor Agreements Abstract Conflicts between mining companies and communities are now prevalent in many countries of the world, both developed and developing. These conflicts have often resulted in delays of mine project development as well as adverse effects to the communities. Reduction of those conflicts has been shown to be best accomplished by good communication, transparency, and a willingness of each of the parties to both understand the positions of other participants, but also a willingness to compromise. One of the types of agreements that have shown success is termed a “Good Neighbor Agreement” (GNA). The needs for this project are to create an open dialog between the mining company and all interested parties who may have concerns regarding the social or environmental impacts from the mine, to minimize the possible conflicts and disagreements, and create the negotiation tools, which can be implemented any time, depending on the needs. In this case, an agreement is negotiated where good communication and frequent meetings are utilized, and the resulting agreement has sufficient penalties that if any of the signatories to the agreement fail to abide by that agreement, those penalties will be imposed. This process is often complicated, but ultimately has the potential to reduce threats of appeals or legal action, but at the same time may require elimination of certain practices.
    [Show full text]
  • SEDIMENT-HOSTED AU DEPOSITS (MODEL 26A; Berger, 1986) By
    SEDIMENT-HOSTED AU DEPOSITS (MODEL 26a; Berger, 1986) by Albert H. Hofstra, Joel S. Leventhal, David J. Grimes, and William D. Heran SUMMARY OF RELEVANT GEOLOGIC, GEOENVIRONMENTAL, AND GEOPHYSICAL INFORMATION Carlin-type deposits are epigenetic, large-tonnage, low-grade, sediment-hosted disseminated gold deposits. The deposits are known mainly in northern Nevada and northwestern Utah where they are arranged in clusters and belts. The deposits in this region are estimated to contain about 5,000 tonnes of gold, more than half of which (~3100 tonnes) is in the Carlin Trend. Approximately 1,000 tonnes of gold have been produced. Carlin-type gold deposits are one of the most important types currently being mined in the western United States. Many aspects of this geoenvironmental model also apply to distal disseminated deposits as defined by Cox and Singer (1990), Doebrich and Theodore (in press), and Howe and others (1995). Deposit geology Unoxidized refractory ore: Refractory ore consists of variably decalcified, dedolomitized, argillized, silicified, sulfidized, carbonaceous sedimentary rocks that contain disseminated iron, arsenic, antimony, mercury, and thallium sulfide minerals. Base-metal sulfide minerals are rare or absent in most deposits. Although pyrite, marcasite, orpiment, and realgar have high acid-generating capacity, they generally are present in small amounts (much less than 5 volume percent) and are usually disseminated in, or surrounded by, carbonate rocks with high acid-consuming capacity. Zones with 5-50 volume percent pyrite, marcasite, orpiment, or realgar are present in some deposits. Ore is refractory because much of the gold forms sub-micron grains in pyrite and marcasite and because carbon in the rock can extract gold from cyanide solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Number 72 Spring 2016
    Number 72 Spring 2016 An organization of retirees of the Geologic Division, U.S. Geological Survey, who seek to keep in touch with each other and with their former Agency. Officers National Officers President John Keith 703-435-1147 Vice President John Aaron 703-437-4001 Secretary/Treasurer Odette B. James 703-476-9738 Regional Officers East Jim McNeal 703-476-0025 Central John S. Stuckless 303-236-7847 Katherine L. Varnes 303-237-2639 West Pat Muffler 650-493-6439 Newsletter Editor Bill Outerbridge 703-860-8537 Deputy Assistant Editor Kathleen Gohn 703-620-3368 Production Dave Newman 540-212-3281 Directory Coordinator Odette James 703-476-9738 References Bob Tilling [email protected] Address Geologic Division Retirees U.S. Geological Survey 953 National Center Reston, VA 20192 Email Address [email protected] About the Cover: Sampling trip into the Sierra Agua Verde, Sonora, Mexico, February 20, 1983. Left to right: Juan Manuel Morales-Ramirez, Anita Harris, Bruce Wardlaw, Jack Stewart, and Barney Poole. Before his recent death, Bruce told John Keith that each person collected about 20 kilos of rock, and the hike out was a very long one. Anita was lagging behind, and Bruce dropped back to check on her. She said, “I just can’t make it with my samples—can you put them in your pack and not tell the others?” So Bruce hauled 40 kilos for the rest of the trip. (Photo by Barney P. with camera on timer) From the President Treasurer’s Report and Membership Statistics Many of you are familiar with the American Geosciences (formerly Geologic) Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report Getchell Project NI 43-101 Technical Report Premier Gold Mines Limited and I-80 Gold Corp
    AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd. BC0767129 200 Granville Street, Suite 202 Vancouver BC V6C 1S4 Canada T +1 604 669 0044 E [email protected] W amcconsultants.com Technical Report Getchell Project NI 43-101 Technical Report Premier Gold Mines Limited and i-80 Gold Corp Humboldt County, Nevada, USA In accordance with the requirements of National Instrument 43-101 “Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects” of the Canadian Securities Administrators Qualified Persons: D Nussipakynova, P.Geo. P Greenhill, FAusIMM (CP) AMC Project 720031 Effective date 23 July 2020 Report date 22 January 2021 Unearth a smarter way Getchell Project NI 43-101 Technical Report Premier Gold Mines Limited and i-80 Gold Corp 720031 1 Summary 1.1 Introduction This Technical Report (the Report) provides an update of the Mineral Resource estimates and metallurgy of the Mineral Resources identified within the Getchell Project (Property) located in Humboldt County, Nevada, USA. The Report has been prepared by AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd. (AMC) of Vancouver, Canada on behalf of Premier Gold Mines Limited / i-80 Gold Corp (i-80 or the Companies). On 10 August 2020, Premier entered into a definitive purchase agreement with affiliates of Waterton Global Resource Management, Inc. to acquire from Waterton all of the outstanding membership interests of Osgood Mining Company LLC (OMC). The Property comprises a number of property parcels which collectively encompass 2,545 acres in the Potosi mining district. The four-square miles of land contain all areas of past gold production and the area of the currently estimated Mineral Resource. This area includes the historical Pinson Mine.
    [Show full text]
  • Net Income Rises 29% to $514 Million ($0.59 Per Share) Expanded Margins Increase Profitability in Q1
    FIRST QUARTER REPORT - MAY 6, 2008 For a full explanation of results, the Financial Statements and Management Discussion & Analysis, Based on US GAAP and expressed in US dollars full-year guidance at significant mines, and mine statistics, please see the Company’s website, www.barrick.com. Net Income Rises 29% to $514 Million ($0.59 per share) Expanded Margins Increase Profitability in Q1 Highlights • The Company reported first quarter net income of $514 million ($0.59 per share) and operating cash flow of $728 million ($0.83 per share) compared to a net loss of $159 million ($0.18 per share) and operating cash flow of $163 million ($0.19 per share) in the prior year period. Reported net income rose 29% compared to prior year adjusted net income of $398 million ($0.46 per share)1 and included $29 million of post-tax special items that reduced income by $0.03 per share. Adjusting for these special items, earnings of $0.62 per share are a Company record. The realized gold price of $925 per ounce matched the average spot price for the quarter. • First quarter gold production was 1.74 million ounces at total cash costs of $393 per ounce2, and copper production was 87 million pounds at total cash costs of $0.94 per pound2. The Company maintains full year production guidance of 7.6 - 8.1 million ounces of gold at total cash costs of $390 - $415 per ounce and 380 - 400 million pounds of copper at total cash costs of $1.15 - $1.25 per pound.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Information Form for the Year Ended December 31, 2018 Dated As of March 22, 2019 BARRICK GOLD CORPORATION
    Barrick Gold Corporation Brookfield Place, TD Canada Trust Tower Suite 3700, 161 Bay Street, P.O. Box 212 Toronto, ON M5J 2S1 Annual Information Form For the year ended December 31, 2018 Dated as of March 22, 2019 BARRICK GOLD CORPORATION ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY OF TECHNICAL AND BUSINESS TERMS 4 REPORTING CURRENCY, FINANCIAL AND RESERVE INFORMATION 10 FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION 11 SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION 14 THIRD PARTY DATA 15 GENERAL INFORMATION 15 Organizational Structure 15 Subsidiaries 16 Areas of Interest 18 General Development of the Business 18 History 18 Significant Acquisitions 18 Strategy 19 Recent Developments 21 Results of Operations in 2018 22 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS 26 Production and Guidance 26 Reportable Operating Segments 26 Barrick Nevada 27 Pueblo Viejo (60% basis) 28 Lagunas Norte 29 Veladero (50% basis) 29 Turquoise Ridge (75% basis) 30 Acacia Mining plc (63.9% basis) 31 Pascua-Lama Project 32 Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources 33 Marketing and Distribution 46 Employees and Labor Relations 47 Competition 48 Sustainability 48 Operations in Emerging Markets: Corporate Governance and Internal Controls 49 Board and Management Experience and Oversight 50 Communications 51 - i - Internal Controls and Cash Management Practices 51 Managing Cultural Differences 52 Books and Records 52 MATERIAL PROPERTIES 52 Cortez Property 52 Goldstrike Property 58 Turquoise Ridge Mine 63 Pueblo Viejo Mine 69 Veladero Mine 76 Kibali Mine 86 Loulo-Gounkoto Mine Complex 93 EXPLORATION
    [Show full text]
  • Golden Rules Making the Case for Responsible Mining
    GOLDEN RULES Making the case for responsible mining A REPORT BY EARTHWORKS AND OXFAM AMERICA Contents Introduction: The Golden Rules 2 Grasberg Mine, Indonesia 5 Yanacocha Mine, Peru, and Cortez Mine, Nevada 7 BHP Billiton Iron Ore Mines, Australia 9 Hemlo Camp Mines, Canada 10 Mongbwalu Mine, the Democratic Republic of Congo 13 Rosia Montana Mine, Romania 15 Marcopper Mine, the Philippines, and Minahasa Raya and Batu Hijau Mines, Indonesia 17 Porgera Gold Mine, Papua New Guinea 18 Junín Mine, Ecuador 21 Akyem Mine, Ghana 22 Pebble Mine, Alaska 23 Zortman-Landusky Mine, Montana 25 Bogoso/Prestea Mine, Ghana 26 Jerritt Canyon Mine, Nevada 27 Summitville Mine, Colorado 29 Following the rules: An agenda for action 30 Notes 31 Cover: Sadiola Gold Mine, Mali | Brett Eloff/Oxfam America Copyright © EARTHWORKS, Oxfam America, 2007. Reproduction is permitted for educational or noncommercial purposes, provided credit is given to EARTHWORKS and Oxfam America. Around the world, large-scale metals mining takes an enormous toll on the health of the environment and communities. Gold mining, in particular, is one of the dirtiest industries in the world. Massive open-pit mines, some measuring as much as two miles (3.2 kilometers) across, generate staggering quantities of waste—an average of 76 tons for every ounce of gold.1 In the US, metals mining is the leading contributor of toxic emissions to the environment.2 And in countries such as Ghana, Romania, and the Philippines, mining has also been associated with human rights violations, the displacement of people from their homes, and the disruption of traditional livelihoods.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Mine Leachates and the Development of a Ground-Water Monitoring Strategy for Mine Sites
    United States Office of Research and EPA/600/SR-99/007 Environmental Protection Development February 1999 Agency Washington, D.C. 20460 Project Summary Characterization of Mine Leachates and the Development of a Ground-Water Monitoring Strategy for Mine Sites Russell H. Plumb Jr. The total number of active and effective ground-water monitoring inactive mining sites in the United strategy: States has been estimated to be as high as 82,000. The 20,000 active mining 1. The composition and environ- sites currently process an estimated 1.5 mental behavior of mine waste billion tons of ore per year and the leachates is poorly understood. cumulative quantity of mine waste that has been produced has been estimated 2. The problem of how to effectively to be 50 billion tons. These wastes are sample the large areas covered by usually discarded in waste piles, tailings tailings ponds, that range in size basins, and depleted heap leaching from several acres to several pads. Although the adverse thousand acres, has never been environmental impacts of mine waste addressed. leachates and acid mine drainage on surface waters have been widely 3. The parameters that should be documented, the impact of mine monitored in ground water leachates on ground water is poorly adjacent to mine waste disposal understood. One of the factors that sites to detect fugitive mine waste contributes to this situation is the fact leachate have not been selected that the United States does not have a and evaluated. national strategy for monitoring of mining sites. The objective of this research project was to develop a better understanding When the Resource, Conservation, of the composition of mine waste and Recovery Act (RCRA) program was leachates and to identify cost effective initially developed, seventeen industries ground-water monitoring parameters were classified as generators of non- that could be incorporated into a hazardous wastes and exempted from monitoring strategy to reliably detect the the ground-water monitoring migration of contaminants from hard requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Reportannual 2016 Barrick Goldbarrick Corporation of Owners Of
    Barrick Gold Corporation Annual Report 2016 Barrick Gold Corporation A Company of Owners Annual Report 2016 Our Vision is the generation of wealth through responsible mining – wealth for our owners, our people, and the countries and communities with which we partner. We aim to be the leading mining company focused on gold, growing our cash flow per share by developing and operating high-quality assets through disciplined allocation of human and financial capital and operational excellence. “ In 2016, we further strengthened our balance sheet and generated record free cash flow through a disciplined and rigorous approach to capital allocation. Going forward, digital technology and innovation will play an increasingly important role across our business as we seek to grow the long-term value of our portfolio with a focus on growing margins and returns over production volume.”Kelvin Dushnisky, President Our Assets are located in geopolitically stable regions with an increasing focus on our five core mines in the Americas. Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves6 As at Production Cost of Sales AISC1† Tonnes Grade Contained Golden Sunlight Hemlo December 31, 2016 (000s ozs) ($/oz) ($/oz) (000s ozs) (gm/t) (000s ozs) Turquoise Ridge JV Goldstrike 20% Cortez Goldstrike 1,096 852 714 70,685 3.55 8,077 19% ~70% of 2016 production Cortez 1,059 901 518 151,002 2.11 10,220 Pueblo Viejo 13% from core mines at Cost of Sales$793/oz Pueblo Viejo (60%) 700 564 490 85,821 2.93 8,087 1 8% and AISC $606/oz Lagunas Norte Lagunas Norte 435 651 529 70,670 1.86 4,218 Other Gold Mines: Porgera JV, Papua New Guinea Veladero 544 872 769 252,125 0.83 6,749 Kalgoorlie JV, Australia Acacia, Tanzania Other Copper Mines: Core mines sub-total 3,834 793 606 631,283 1.85 37,473 Zaldívar Copper JV 10% Jabal Sayid JV, Saudi Arabia Veladero Lumwana, Zambia Total Barrick 5,517 798 730 2,006,898 1.33 85,950 †Please see page 84 of the 2016 Financial Report for corresponding endnotes.
    [Show full text]
  • Carlin-Type Gold Deposits in Nevada: Critical Geologic Characteristics and Viable Models
    ©2005 Society of Economic Geologists, Inc. Economic Geology 100th Anniversary Volume pp. 451–484 Carlin-Type Gold Deposits in Nevada: Critical Geologic Characteristics and Viable Models JEAN S. CLINE,† University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 4505 Maryland Parkway, Box 454010, Las Vegas, Nevada 89154-4010 ALBERT H. HOFSTRA, Mineral Resources Program, U.S. Geological Survey, Mail Stop 973, Box 25046, Denver, Colorado 80225 JOHN L. MUNTEAN, Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, Mail Stop 178, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557-0088 RICHARD M. TOSDAL, AND KENNETH A. HICKEY Mineral Deposit Research Unit, University of British Columbia, 6339 Stores Road, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z4 Abstract Carlin-type Au deposits in Nevada have huge Au endowments that have made the state, and the United States, one of the leading Au producers in the world. Forty years of mining and numerous studies have pro- vided a detailed geologic picture of the deposits, yet a comprehensive and widely accepted genetic model re- mains elusive. The genesis of the deposits has been difficult to determine owing to difficulties in identifying and analyzing the fine-grained, volumetrically minor, and common ore and gangue minerals, and because of postore weathering and oxidation. In addition, other approximately contemporaneous precious metal deposits have overprinted, or are overprinted by, Carlin-type mineralization. Recent geochronological studies have led to a consensus that the Nevada deposits formed ~42 to 36 m.y. ago, and the deposits can now be evaluated in the context of their tectonic setting. Continental rifting and deposi- tion of a passive margin sequence followed by compressional orogenies established a premineral architecture of steeply dipping fluid conduits, shallow, low dipping “traps” and reactive calcareous host rocks.
    [Show full text]