DOCSLIB.ORG

Schaefer-1979.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Schaefer-1979.Pdf THE ANAMAX PROJECT HISTORY OF THE ROSEMONT AREA IN THE SANTA RITA MOUNTAINS, ARIZONA by Jerome Schaefer ✓ Cultural Resource Management Section Arizona State Museum The University of Arizona November 1979 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES iii 1. INTRODUCTION 1 Trends, Events, and Innovations affecting Historic Activity . 1 2. DEMOGRAPHIC PATTERNS 7 Population Trends 7 3. ROSEMONT CAMP AND THE ROSEMONT MINES 11 Life in Rosemont 15 Transportation 16 The Hotel 17 The Rosemont School '21 The Rosemont Store 21 Entertainment 22 The Rosemont Ranger Station 23 4. OTHER MINES 25 Narragansett Mine and New Rosemont 25 Helena Mine 26 5 RANCHING HISTORY 28 General Trends 28 The Scholefield or Hidden Spring Ranch 29 The VR Ranch 30 Lopez's Ranch 31 Chapo's Ranch 32 Martinez Ranch 32 St. Helena Ranch and_the-St.,Helena,Cattle Company 33 Outlying Range Management Installations 33 6. PROSPECTS AND PROBLEMS FOR HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY 34 APPENDIX A, Catalogue of Primary Documents 39 REFERENCES 50 ii LIST OF FIGURES 1. Chronology of events in the history of Rosemont and environs . 2 2. Copper prices and production in the Helvetia Mining District . 5 3. Population trends in the Rosemont, Helvetia, and Greaterville Districts 8 4. Historic localities in the ANAMAX Exchange area 12 5. Plat of the claim of Charles W. Welch, Assignee of Leonard Lewisohn 18 6. Undated photograph of Rosemont, looking west 19 7. The hotel, store, warehouse, smelter, and assayer's office in 1900 20 8. Miner's tent house Helvetia at the turn of the century 36 9. Homes of Mexican miners in Helvetia at the turn of the century . 37 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Soon a large open pit copper mine, mill, and dump will permanently alter the surface of the Rosemont area on the eastern slopes of the Santa Rita Mountains. The rich copper-bearing deposits that are now the focus of the ANAMAX Mining Company have attracted miners since the 1870s. The early miners shared this country with the ranchers who were attracted by other natural resources--the rich grazing lands and numerous springs for their cattle. The archaeological sites left by these early pioneers and their descendents reflect two of the major economic forces which today continue to shape Arizona's history and culture. This report documents the history of ranching and mining in the Rosemont area which will be given to the ANAMAX Mining Company, by the Coronado National Forest in exchange for other lands. As part of the testing phase of the ANAMAX project, this historical framework will aid in the evaluation of archaeological resources which are threatened by the proposed open pit mining operations. Included in the report is an outline of political and economic trends affecting the mining and cattle industries in the Santa Ritas, an outline of major demographic patterns, histories of each mine and ranch in the effected area, and a statement on the problems and potential for using the historical records in interpreting archaeologi- cal remains. Fihally, the primary documents pertaining to the Rosemont area are catalogued in Appendix A. These documents are referred to throughout the text. Trends, Events, and Innovations affecting Historic Activity The history of ranching and mining in the Rosemont area can only be understood within the context of processes taking place on the national and regional level. Political, economic, and technological changes affecting the entire world were sometimes felt in Rosemont, manifested by changing patterns of local population growth, maintenance, and decline, and by chang- ing Intensities of economic activity. A summary of relevant historical events appears in Figure 1, with an emphasis given to mining. The upper time line traces national and regional events which had an impact on the locale ecomomy and settlement pattern. Stippled,amas indicate major events of some duration, such as war and eco- nomic depression. The lower time line is a detailed history of mining. Events labelled above the line refer directly to the Rosemont district. Events labelled below the line refer to the Helvetia and Greaterville areas predominantly. The stippled portions of the lower time line denote periods of intense mining while checkered areas indicate intermittant activity. Areas that have been left clear denote periods of little or no mining. 1 TIME LINES OF HISTORIC EVENTS 6 •OSP e. 4e0c;6 \ oa e 4 t:!1S' OP ,61c c>';/‹ef,..,e Ne.e; c' o' ,,,.. \oz 0 ,P •aP) \<s °°' cf .,(>2CP e,„'1,2' ,.:' e ,d," , ,e,,,,;\ :R":,ef' .\,z," ,<oc..` (e' ... 0 fc.,6 cp i( . ( ,;., \ c., ‘ ,..- k oa *• e- < \ a o 60 ‘sb. c:( e. ..42. .\ < >4\N 6P <( l' 2P •-• 2, \0 6,02.‹, 6 4k, 42' (2.' eP ..' w as tea t)( ( eP *.' \ " <)" \ 6k < 0 (N 2,a \ \ 6 ir ,,,P R . ,c)(4- 40 ,,,,,,? e' 4;N r <'› 4, :r cD• qz., .e o` MAJOR NATIONAL AND REGIONAL EVENTS e at' OC \ 2 / , ,,e'C'C .(4- eP\ IP' lacy (P 41). .t6 ea - 6 e9( t. \6 2:c •C c:c. o . rP\o' teat',,c' NiA •6" .: \ (5P . <,P) e .' i`z • cs 6( ,,•<)e a \ oe 6,,,,• 26 \ o •,a a , ' eo \Is\ ',6° 2::\ 'C GfiP - S's C c,6 S , p e" 4 act' \(.se'e:':S2' • •('a A lcFg) (P \ s ' 'P s ° \ ( Sc\ \.,. .. 4P c> ,c '"P ';° ,:-.,,'; e , ((■ to .ct,6 2> 2a e o'' ..,F.4, .4\ 0"' ,5-. ,:,S, NN K, '‘ (‘e>4 $ a ..0 ea"' 4;" ` l. efP ..2P (.0:( e (!P -a6 4. za „, e t • ( a - C te''IC , C> ,.,c,e c, , ,,,, \(‘ 40 .( - -0• . "c!A. ° ,p, eoat T".' R.P e . ,,° -40,`"‘ e:( ,. a( - (2 4> (> al,P:c s • t::1 '.P et' ex 1P ce -(P se\ oas tf .i., 1.9. ss4 \e l- „(.6 ca 46cs ROSEMONT HISTORY re CP R, 1111111111111•11EMISMINI OTHER MINES & EVENTS (Jo •2' \ oC ea ep.-\ '''\ K., •64: (7, s \ 1,6 Q•C' ...a \ <•R. 2i ° ,,,4V 6 (>''' C 6 ' C6) `62. '''' Key to lower time line 2' CC). ..' .( , e o 6 ...‹,c cp' 1i4v,,,.P \\\eOe. = intense mining e paeg \z u 't 4 .e, . 0 cP,e: a e QR ,i,.\ 0 V NO) \ s'dr at' ° 0 = intermittent mining G°\J ? e:c Ns'e'•,r,N e,\• CP V-4 i'•2.°Y4 = little or no mining •2;\ 111[1111111111111 Mill it 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 Figure 1 3 Specific events in Rosemont's history are fully treated in the text below and are of secondary concern for this discussion. Rather, I will here relate general trends of mining activity to national and regional history. Ranching history is less dynamic in the Rosemont area and while not shown in Figure 1, it is discussed fully in Chapter 4. It was the lust for gold and silver which first attracted Europeans to Arizona. In 1539 Friar Marcos de Niza and Estevan traveled the southwest looking for the fabled Seven Cities of Cibola and their mineral wealth. The Coronado expedition to the Pueblos the following year proved that no such riches existed. Miners from Mexico found that indeed such wealth did exist but that it could not be simply taken from the indigenous population as the conquistidores had done, Instead, they exploited the rich silver mines of southern Arizona and the Indian population as well. In 1705, Father Kino described the silver ores of the Santa Rita deposits. Through the 1700s Spanish mines were operated in the Santa Rita, Cerro Colorado, and Ajo regions, The first American mining followed the Gadsden purchase in 1852 when southern Arizona south of the Gila River and southern New Mexico were sold by the Mexicamkto become a new territory of the United States, Soon after in 1856, the Santa Rita silver mines near Tubac were opened. Exploration of the Santa Rita and Cerro Colorado mountains produced many a glory hole and shaft mine in the late 1850s. Notable among the larger operations were the Mowry Mine in the Patagonia Mountains, the Gila Dome Placers near Yuma, and the Heintzelman Mine in the Cerro Colorado Mountains. The Civil War curtailed many mining operations after 1861 because the Army had to be withdrawn and Apache raids grew more frequent. The massacre of the Santa Rita silver miners must have scared many miners off their claims, Following the Civil War and the Apache campaigns from 1871 to 1886, many of the miners returned to the mountainsof southern Arizona. Most of the ranchers and early prospectors had returned to the Rosemont area by the mid to late 1870s and they had to contend with Apache raids until Geronimo's surrender (Docu- ment 27). The procedure by which miners located, patented, and worked their claims was set forth in the 1872 federal mining laws (Thompson 1915). These laws also allowed for local mining customs to prevail when they did not con- flict with federal statutes. All through Arizona and the Western United States, miners working the same area organized themselves into communally recognized mining districts. At periodic meetings they set forth and enforced the rules for making claims and for personal conduct. By 1881 there were fifty districts distributed throughout the ore-bearing regions of Arizona. The number of districts has increased through time until over two hundred districtS and localities can be counted today. A the start of Rosemont's development, it was already part of the Helvetia Mining District and subject to the rules set forth at the annual district meeting. These rules were a conglomeration of practices developed by Cornish, Mexican, and California miners (Shinns 1885).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • March 2021 Volume 22, Issue 1 EMPIRE RANCH FOUNDATION NEWS
    March 2021 Volume 22, Issue 1 EMPIRE RANCH FOUNDATION NEWS P.O Box 842 * Sonoita, Arizona 85637-0842 * (888) 364-2829 www.empireranchfoundation.org Ranch in 1876 and had begun the de- Thanks! Edward Vail Stories velopment of the Total Wreck silver The response to our year-end appeal to mine. help the Foundation renovate the New Upon his arrival in Arizona Ned Ranch House was fantastic! Over $8,000 became the assayer of the Total Wreck has been added to the renovation fund. Mine and later purchased and managed We also received our first four-year the Rosemont Ranch on the east slope pledge. Please consider making a pledge of the Santa Rita Mountains. He partic- for this exciting project. Email ipated actively in Vail family ranching [email protected] or operations in Arizona and California call 888-364-2829. throughout his life. A lifelong bachelor, COVID19 still limits our ability to Edward “Ned” Vail, beside his car on the he was fondly known by his nieces and host events, volunteer workdays, and Empire Ranch, ca 1920 (photo: M. V. nephews as “Tio.” He died at the age of docent tours. The Ranch House remains Woolley) 87 on October 14, 1936 in Tucson. open to visitors. When circumstances Edward “Ned” L. Vail was born Sep- In the 1920s Ned began to write permit, we hope to institute a greeter tember 19, 1849 in Liverpool, Nova reminiscences of his experiences in ear- program. Trained volunteers would be Scotia, Canada, the eldest son of ly Arizona, many of which were pub- stationed outdoors on weekends to an- Mahlon and Elizabeth Boyle Vail.
    [Show full text]
  • The EMPIRE RANCH HOUSE a Brief History
    to his sister in London, England, Hislop described the house as having The EMPIRE RANCH HOUSE “two bedrooms, kitchen, and a storeroom.” At the back of the house was a corral for holding the cattle and protecting stock from thieves and preda- A Brief History tors at night. The breezeway between the rooms, sometimes referred to by the Spanish term “zaguan,” provided the only entry into the corral. Beams Aug. 2013 Rev. and latillas used in constructing the original, flat roof are still visible from the inside of the breezeway. Hislop’s letter also said that the house had no windows or doors, meaning that there were only window and door open- ings, no furnishing, and that “plaster was needed.” The two men installed window panes, doors and a wooden floor themselves. Although Vail had acquired some carpentering skills while working in the Nevada goldfields, neither of the men was experienced in working with adobe mud or plaster. To accomplish this task they hired two Native American adobe masons. In 1881 Vail returned to New Jersey to marry his longtime sweetheart, Mar- garet Newhall, and bring her back to the Empire Ranch. As a wedding present to his bride, Vail had a half-hexagon bay window built into the north wall of the living room. Rooms were added to the house to accommodate a grow- ing staff and the family that Vail and Margaret planned to raise. Empire Ranch Vaqueros circa 1890 In the late 1870’s, a rear addition of rooms for offices and staff were added, Photo Courtesy Laura (“Dusty”) Vail Ingram and a gable-roofed Victorian addition followed.
    [Show full text]
  • Rosemont Copper Mine Complaint
    Case 4:19-cv-00177-JAS Document 1 Filed 03/27/19 Page 1 of 94 1 Roger Flynn (CO Bar # 21078) (Applicant Pro Hac Vice) Jeffrey C. Parsons (CO Bar # 30210) (Applicant Pro Hac Vice) 2 WESTERN MINING ACTION PROJECT 3 P.O. Box 349, 440 Main Street, #2 Lyons, CO 80540 4 Phone: 303-823-5738 5 Email: [email protected] 6 Marc D. Fink (MN Bar # 343407) (Applicant Pro Hac Vice) 7 Center for Biological Diversity 209 East 7th Street 8 Duluth, Minnesota 55805 Phone: 218-464-0539 9 Email: [email protected] 10 Allison N. Melton (CO Bar # 45088) (Applicant Pro Hac Vice) 11 Center for Biological Diversity 12 128 Cascadilla St./#3024 Crested Butte, CO 81224 13 Phone: 970-309-2008 14 Email: [email protected] 15 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA TUCSON DIVISION 18 19 Save the Scenic Santa Ritas; ) Center for Biological Diversity; ) Case No. 20 Arizona Mining Reform Coalition; ) 21 Sierra Club Grand Canyon Chapter; ) COMPLAINT FOR 22 ) VACATUR, AND 23 Plaintiffs, ) EQUITABLE, v. ) DECLARATORY, AND 24 ) INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 25 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; ) 26 D. Peter Helmlinger, Brigadier General, U.S. ) Army, in his official capacity; ) 27 ) 28 Defendants. ) Case 4:19-cv-00177-JAS Document 1 Filed 03/27/19 Page 2 of 94 1 INTRODUCTION 2 1. This case challenges the decisions of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 3 (“Corps”) to issue a permit that authorizes the construction and operation of the 4 5 Rosemont Copper Project (“Rosemont Project” or “Mine”), a large-scale open pit copper 6 mine in the heart of the Santa Rita Mountains south of Tucson, Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • Rosemont Preliminary Injunction Release
    For Immediate Release, May 16, 2019 Court Order Sought to Stop Rosemont Mine Construction in Arizona TUCSON, Ariz.— Conservation groups and tribes yesterday asked a federal court to prevent construction from starting on the Rosemont Copper Mine in southern Arizona until a judge rules on pending lawsuits filed by the parties. Yesterday’s motion for a preliminary inJunction, filed in U.S. District Court in Tucson, pertains to five lawsuits filed over the past two years by Save the Scenic Santa Ritas, the Center for Biological Diversity, the Arizona Mining Reform Coalition, the Sierra Club’s Grand Canyon Chapter, and the Tohono O’odham, Pascua Yaqui and Hopi tribes. The lawsuits seek to overturn a series of federal approvals greenlighting the controversial open-pit copper mine in the Santa Rita Mountains. “The Rosemont mine would cause irreparable and permanent damage to our water and mountains,” said Gayle Hartmann, president of Save the Scenic Santa Ritas. “Allowing Rosemont to commence construction activities prior to a judge addressing the serious issues in our suit would deny southern Arizonans the Justice to which they are entitled under the law.” The lawsuits say that federal agencies violated fundamental environmental laws, including the Clean Water Act and the Endangered Species Act, when they approved the massive Rosemont Mine. The mile-wide, 3,000-foot-deep mine would dry up critical water sources, harm a number of endangered species and destroy thousands of acres of public land in the Coronado National Forest. Hudbay Minerals, the proJect’s owner, has announced plans to begin ground-disturbing activities in July.
    [Show full text]
  • Growing up a Tomboy on the Empire Ranch, Part I
    Growing up a tomboy on the Empire Ranch, Part I By Betty Barr This article was originally printed in The Bulletin in two parts, July 18 and 23, 2003. It is posted on the Empire Ranch Foundation website with Betty Barr’s permission. This material is copyrighted and may not be further reproduced without permission of the author. It was a windy day in early December 1914, and several murderers had been spotted near the Empire Ranch in Sonoita. The young rancher, Banning Vail, along with a group of deputies, had set out on the manhunt when word was received that Vail’s first child was about to be born in Tucson. Leaving the posse, he hurried to town to welcome his daughter into the world. Vail laughingly observed that the baby must be thirsty, she was bawling so loudly she sounded “dusty.” The nickname stuck, and as Dusty Vail often remarked, the name suited her a lot better than the ladylike, Laura, that she was christened with. It was later learned that the man who replaced Vail on the posse was killed and the family always credited Dusty with saving her father’s life. Growing up on a ranch in the early twentieth century was an exciting adventure for Dusty Vail Ingram, a little girl who idolized her dad and loved horses. The fearless tomboy was up on a horse at age six. One day when no one was around she lugged her saddle up on the fence, then dropped it down on the horse and hopped aboard. All went smoothly until she returned from the ride and leaned down to unlatch the gate.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project V Executive Summary
    Executive Summary Introduction Augusta Resource Corporation (Augusta Resource), the parent company of Rosemont Copper Company (Rosemont Copper), submitted a preliminary mine plan of operations (MPO) to the Coronado National Forest (the Coronado), an administrative unit of the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service (Forest Service), for development of the Rosemont ore deposit. The proposed mine site is located on the east side of the Santa Rita Mountains of the Nogales Ranger District, approximately 30 miles south of Tucson, Arizona (figure ES1). Activity is proposed on approximately 995 acres of private land owned by Rosemont Copper, 3,670 acres of National Forest System land, 15 acres of Bureau of Land Management administered land, and 75 acres of Arizona State Land Department land administered as a State Trust. This includes a proposed utility corridor that is needed to provide utility services to the project area. The mine life, including construction, operation, reclamation, and closure, is approximately 25 years and may include beneficial and adverse impacts on the human environment. Three Federal agencies have authority regarding the preliminary MPO approval: the Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. A number of permits would need to be obtained before mine construction could commence. These permits, which are described in chapter 2 of the draft environmental impact statement (DEIS), are regulated by a variety of Federal, State, and local agencies. The Forest Service is the lead agency, and land managers for the Coronado National Forest prepared the DEIS. The Rosemont Copper Project DEIS describes the direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts on environmental resources for the proposed action and alternatives.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Empire Ranch
    HISTORY OF THE EMPIRE RANCH by Gregory Paul Dowell A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY In Partial Fulfillment off the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1978 Original typescript thesis converted by the Empire Ranch Foundation to a Word document in 2011 with permission granted by Gregory Paul Dowell STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgement of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by, the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED: _______________________________ APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: ______________________________ ____________________ HARWOOD PERRY HINTON Date Professor of History Dowell, Gregory Paul History of the Empire Ranch, 1978 ii PREFACE Ranching in southern Arizona assumed a measure of permanence in the 1870s. With the slackening of the Apache threat, a number of cattle growers filtered into the valleys south of Tucson to start ranches and supply beef to mining camps and military detachments.
    [Show full text]
  • Rosemont Copper Mine United States
    Rosemont Copper Mine United States Sectors: Mining On record This profile is no longer actively maintained, with the information now possibly out of date Send feedback on this profile By: BankTrack Created before Nov 2016 Last update: Oct 12 2016 Contact: Doug Norlen, Pacific Environment Project website Sectors Mining Location Website http://rosemontcopper.com/ About Rosemont Copper Mine Vancouver-based speculative mining company, Augusta Resource Corporation, and its Arizona subsidiary, Rosemont Copper Company, plan to blast a mile-wide, half-mile deep copper mine on 4,000 acres of the Santa Rita mountains on the Coronado National Forest, 35-miles southeast of Tucson. Rosemont claims the mine could supply 10 percent of U.S. copper output, producing 244 million pounds of copper concentrate a year for about 21 years. The mine is vehemently opposed by residents and local governments in the area who fear for water contamination, depletion of underground drinking water supplies and the destruction of the landscape that includes suitable habitat for endangered species. For more details on their concerns please visit here. The project requires a Record of Decision from the Coronado National Forest and issuance of a Clean Water Act permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has veto authority over water permits issued by the Army Corps. EPA Region IX has been sharply critical of Rosemont's Mine Plan of Operations. Impacts Governance Other applicable regulations The project requires a Record of Decision from the Coronado National Forest and issuance of a Clean Water Act permit from the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic and Riparian Herpetofauna of Las Cienegas National Conservation Area, Empire-Cienega Ranch, Pima County, Arizona
    AQUATIC AND RIPARIAN HERPETOFAUNA OF LAS CIENEGAS NATIONAL CONSERVATION AREA, EMPIRE-CIENEGA RANCH, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA Philip C. Rosen, Assistant Research Scientist School of Natural Resources, University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 85721 520-621-3187 ph 520-670-5001 fax [email protected] and Dennis J. Caldwell, Caldwell Design 2109 N 2nd Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85705 [email protected] Final Report to: Bureau of Land Management Tucson Office 12661 East Broadway Tucson, AZ 85748 For Cooperative Agreement AAA000011 Task Order No. 6 (BLM, AZ State Office – CESU-FLPMA, University of Arizona) AZ068-1120-BV-SSSS-25-2B 1 September 2004 LAS CIENEGAS AQUATIC AND RIPARIAN HERPETOFAUNA – ROSEN & CALDWELL 2004 2 Aquatic and Riparian Herpetofauna of Las Cienegas National Conservation Area, Empire-Cienega Ranch, Pima County, Arizona 1 September 2004 Philip C. Rosen and Dennis J. Caldwell Executive Summary Las Cienegas National Conservation Area encompasses the Empire and Cienega ranches, including the headwaters and intact cienega-stream of Cienega Creek. This area supports the most intact natural major valley bottom wetland in Arizona, and provides a window to the original environment of other valleys in southeastern Arizona. We intensively inventoried the amphibians and reptiles of the cienega and its riparian environs, and extensively surveyed those in the surrounding xeroriparian and upland environments. These environments, not including species in outlying, rocky environments, support a rich herpetofauna with 38 species verified and an expected
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project 754 Chapter 4
    Chapter 4. Agencies Consulted Introduction This chapter lists the tribes, organizations, and federal, state, and local government agencies consulted during the development of this draft environmental impact statement. Cooperating agencies,1 those with jurisdiction by law or specialized experience, are also identified. Tribal Consultations Ak-Chin Indian Community Fort Sill Apache Tribe Gila River Indian Community Hopi Tribe Mescalero Apache Tribe Pascua Yaqui Tribe Pueblo of Zuni Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community San Carlos Apache Tribe Tohono O’odham Nation White Mountain Apache Tribe Yavapai-Apache Nation Government Federal Bureau of Land Management* Chiricahua National Monument National Park Service, Saguaro National Park* Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory – Fred Lawrence Whipple Observatory* Tumacacori National Historical Park U.S. Army Corps of Engineers* U.S. Bureau of Reclamation U.S. Department of the Air Force Davis- Monthan Air Force Base 162nd Fighter Airwing* U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecological Services Field Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Southwest U.S. House of Representatives Regional Office U.S. Senate 1 Formal cooperating agencies are denoted by an asterisk (*) following the agency name. Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project 754 Chapter 4. Agencies Consulted State Arizona Department of Agriculture Arizona Department of Environmental Quality* Arizona Department of Mines and Mineral Arizona Department of Transportation*
    [Show full text]
  • Rosemont Mine Order
    Case 4:17-cv-00475-JAS Document 291 Filed 02/10/20 Page 1 of 42 1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Center for Biological Diversity, et al., No. CV-17-00475-TUC-JAS (L) No. CV-17-00576-TUC-JAS (C) 10 Plaintiffs, No. CV-18-00189-TUC-JAS (C) CONSOLIDATED 11 v. ORDER 12 United States Fish and Wildlife Service, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment as 16 to the Complaint (Docs. 106, 119, 121),1 the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment 17 as to Rosemont Copper Company (“Rosemont”)’s crossclaims (Docs. 103, 114, 116), and 18 the Federal Defendants’ Motion to Stay (Doc. 252).2 The Motion to Stay (Doc. 252) is 19 denied. The Court finds that the Landis test, as applied in the Ninth Circuit, does not 20 support a stay in this case. Accordingly, the Court will issue a ruling on the remaining 21 matter. 22 SECTION ONE: FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 23 The facts are well known to the parties and were discussed in the Court’s previous 24 Order (Doc. 248).3 The Court will not provide an extensive recitation of the facts; however, 25 1 All citations to the docket are to the lead case, 17-cv-00475. Any citation to a page within 26 the docket is based on the page stamp automatically created by CM-ECF on the top of the page in blue.
    [Show full text]
  • Las Cienegas National Conservation Area 2010 Managers Report
    National Landscape Conservation System FY 2011 Annual Manager’s Report Figure 1 Sacaton grass dominate the view of Mt. Bruce, photo taken at the Audubon Research Ranch, Las Cienegas NCA Las Cienegas National Conservation Area 1 I. Introduction Period of Report: October 1, 2010 through September 30, 2011. Unit Name and Contact Information: Las Cienegas National Conservation Area (LCNCA) Tucson Field Office 3201 E. Universal Way Tucson, AZ 85756 (520) 258-7200 Las Cienegas National Conservation Area website Manager’s name: Markian Rekshynskyj Associated Field, District, and/or State Offices: Field Office: Tucson Field Office District: Gila District State: Arizona State Office Establishing authority: Public Law 106-538, Dec. 6, 2000 Acreage of public land: 41,972 acres of Public Land in Las Cienegas NCA Estimated annual visitation: FY 2011: 26,000 visits 2 Figure 2 Las Cienegas National Conservation Area general map showing only the main roads. 3 1. Natural and Heritage Resources Conditions a. Natural resources trends LCNCA contains 5 major Natural Resources: • Native Grasslands • Cienega Creek Riparian Area • Outstanding Biological, Ecological, Cultural, and Paleontological Resources • Historic Empire Ranch Headquarters • Appleton-Whittell Research ACEC Upland Habitats Figure 3 The Uplands of LCNCA after the Cinco Fire (Photo by H. Swanson) Of the five rare vegetation community types found at Las Cienegas NCA, semi desert grassland is the most abundant and covers about 94% of the total area. This grassland is part of a larger complex of semi desert grasslands within the Apache Highlands Ecoregion which includes central and southern Arizona, southern New Mexico and northern Mexico. Over the past 130 years grasslands in this borderland region have experienced dramatic changes including a reduction in perennial grass cover, shrub and tree encroachment, soil erosion, and fragmentation.
    [Show full text]