Stellate Ganglion Blockade: an Intervention for the Management of Ventricular Arrhythmias
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Current Hypertension Reports (2020) 22:100 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-020-01111-8 DEVICE-BASED APPROACHES FOR HYPERTENSION (M SCHLAICH, SECTION EDITOR) Stellate Ganglion Blockade: an Intervention for the Management of Ventricular Arrhythmias Arun Ganesh1 & Yawar J. Qadri2 & Richard L. Boortz-Marx1 & Sana M. Al-Khatib3 & David H. Harpole Jr4 & Jason N. Katz3 & Jason I. Koontz3,7 & Joseph P. Mathew1 & Neil D. Ray1 & Albert Y. Sun3 & Betty C. Tong4 & Luis Ulloa1,5 & Jonathan P. Piccini3,6,7 & Marat Fudim3,6 Accepted: 25 September 2020 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020 Abstract Purpose of Review To highlight the indications, procedural considerations, and data supporting the use of stellate ganglion blockade (SGB) for management of refractory ventricular arrhythmias. Recent Findings In patients with refractory ventricular arrhythmias, unilateral or bilateral SGB can reduce arrhythmia burden and defibrillation events for 24–72 h, allowing time for use of other therapies like catheter ablation, surgical sympathectomy, or heart transplantation. The efficacy of SGB appears to be consistent despite the type (monomorphic vs polymorphic) or etiology (ischemic vs non-ischemic cardiomyopathy) of the ventricular arrhythmia. Ultrasound-guided SGB is safe with low risk for complications, even when performed on anticoagulation. Summary SGB is effective and safe and could be considered for patients with refractory ventricular arrhythmias. Keywords Stellate ganglion block . Ventricular arrhythmia . Ventricular tachycardia . Ventricular fibrillation Introduction over 450,000 deaths every year in the USA [2]. Electrical storm is a particularly challenging clinical entity in which Ventricular tachycardia (VT) and fibrillation (VF) are life- VT/VF events recur frequently (3 or more episodes of threatening arrhythmias with an increasing prevalence [1]. sustained or hemodynamically significant VT/VF in 24 h). Ventricular arrhythmias are especially common in cardiac This dangerous clinical entity is commonly driven by under- and surgical intensive care units, and they are responsible for lying structural heart disease, and approximately 10–40% of patients have a prior history of VT/VF [3]. Even in the pres- ence of an implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD), electrical This article is part of the Topical Collection on Device-Based Approaches for Hypertension storm confers an eightfold higher risk of arrhythmic death [4]. Despite the use of antiarrhythmic medications, acute mortality * Marat Fudim due to electrical storm remains over 20% [5]. [email protected] The sympathetic nervous system is a key player in the genesis of ventricular arrhythmias and represents an important 1 Duke Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA therapeutic target [6]. Established treatments for ventricular 2 Emory Anesthesiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA arrhythmias include β-blockers, other antiarrhythmic medica- 3 Duke Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin tions, mechanical circulatory support, and catheter ablation. Road, Durham, NC 27710, USA However, these treatments are often inadequate and often do 4 Cardiothoracic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, not successfully suppress VT/VF events. In some cases, the Durham, NC, USA arrhythmias persist despite all therapies, while in other cases, 5 Center for Perioperative Organ Protection, Department of patients may be too hemodynamically unstable to permit in- Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA terventions like catheter ablation. Mounting evidence suggests 6 Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA that stellate ganglion blockade (SGB) can reduce myocardial sympathetic tone and thus serve as a useful adjunct in the 7 Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Duke University Medical Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA management of ventricular arrhythmias and electrical storm. 100 Page 2 of 23 Curr Hypertens Rep (2020) 22:100 SGB has been described as a useful suppressive therapy for disease [9], hyperhidrosis [10], refractory angina [11], ventricular arrhythmias or as a bridge therapy to other inter- and ventricular arrhythmias (Table 1)[12••, 13••]. ventions such as surgical sympathectomy, heart transplanta- The stellate ganglia are bilateral structures. However, the tion, or catheter ablation [7••]. right and left stellate ganglia do not have equivalent sympa- In this manuscript, we provide a comprehensive review of thetic effects on the myocardium. In canine models, left stel- the anatomy of the stellate ganglion, indications for SGB, late ganglion resection results in higher thresholds for induc- procedural technique, safety considerations, and current tion of VF compared with controls and those with right stellate evidence supporting SGB for treating refractory ventric- ganglion resection [14]. Likewise, coronary artery occlusion ular arrhythmias. This review concludes with a discus- amidst left SGB is less arrhythmogenic compared with con- sion of future directions. trols and/or right SGB [15]. These results suggest that the left stellate ganglion contributes more sympathetic tone to the myocardium than the right. This explains why most human Anatomy and Indications studies use unilateral left SGB for treatment of ventricular arrhythmias [7••, 13••]. However, it is also important to note The stellate ganglion is a collection of neuron cell bodies that damage to the myocardium can result in remodeling of characterized by the fusion of the inferior cervical and first both the right and left stellate ganglia, which supports the use thoracic sympathetic ganglia (Fig. 1). The word “stellate” is of bilateral blockade for treatment of ventricular arrhythmias used to describe the ganglion’s star-like shape. The ganglion [16•]. In a porcine model of myocardial infarction (MI), myo- is variably located in the lower part of the neck, typically cardial injury induced bilateral morphologic and neurochem- anterior to the C7 or T1 vertebral body [8]. In the stellate ical changes in the stellate ganglia about 5 weeks after the ganglion, thoracic preganglionic sympathetic nerves synapse initial insult [16•]. MI led to an increase in neuronal size and with post-ganglionic sympathetic nerves that provide efferent synaptic density of both stellate ganglia, with a measurable sympathetic output to the myocardium, upper extremity, neck, increase in neuronal firing for up to 8 weeks. This illustrates and face. In the context of normal physiologic function, SGB that the stellate ganglion is not just a relay point for efferent mediates multiple cardiovascular effects, including vasodila- nerve signals but also receives afferent input from the heart, tion of the upper extremity and face, anhidrosis (part of resulting in the aforementioned changes. Further, remodeling Horner’s syndrome), and reduced inotropy and with changes in gene expression and neuronal structure is not chronotropy. This is why SGB has been successfully limited to stellate ganglia but is also found in the thoracic used to treat upper-extremity ischemia from Raynaud’s dorsal root ganglia (DRG) of the spinal cord [17, 18], Fig. 1 Sympathetic innervation to the heart Curr Hypertens Rep (2020) 22:100 Page 3 of 23 100 Table 1 Indications for stellate ganglion block. Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is the most common indication. PTSD post-traumatic stress disorder Pain Cardiovascular Other CRPS Ventricular arrhythmias PTSD Orofacial pain Raynaud’sdisease Hot flashes Post-herpetic neuralgia Refractory angina Post-mastectomy pain Hyperhidrosis suggestive of afferent crosstalk between the stellate ganglion and central nervous system as well. It is important to understand that while SGB is a relatively recent addition to the electrophysiologic armamentarium, SGB is most commonly used for treatment of chronic pain conditions like complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), orofacial pain, and post-mastectomy pain (Table 1)[19–22]. Given that pain relief can be achieved via sympathetic block- ade, these pain syndromes are often characterized as “sympa- Fig. 2 Ultrasound-guided left stellate ganglion block. The yellow line ” indicates the needle trajectory, and the star is the site of injection. The thetically mediated. Although the underlying mechanisms stellate ganglion resides between the carotid artery and the longus colli remain to be fully elucidated, the coupling between sympa- muscle at the C7/T1 level. The block is often performed at the C6 level to thetic efferent fibers and afferent nociceptive fibers is believed avoid the vertebral artery. The recurrent laryngeal nerve is not denoted to contribute to these pain states [23]. Central mechanisms here but is posterior to the thyroid gland, hence why this can be inadvertently blocked when targeting the stellate ganglion. SCM have also been postulated [24]. There are also reported direct sternocleidomastoid muscle, CA Carotid artery, IJV Internal jugular neural connections from the stellate ganglion to intracerebral vein, AS anterior scalene muscle, LC Longus colli muscle, AT Anterior areas like the amygdala, hypothalamus, and insula, tubercle of C6 vertebrae (Chassaignac’s tubercle) which are known to be involved in pain perception [24]. These areas are also activated during hot flashes and post-traumatic stress disorder, which may explain The technical details of ultrasound-guided SGB have why SGB has been used successfully for the treatment been described previously [27, 28]. In brief, an of these disorders as well