HOUSE of COMMONS COUNCIL HOUSING GROUP Support for the ‘Fourth Option’ for Council Housing

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

HOUSE of COMMONS COUNCIL HOUSING GROUP Support for the ‘Fourth Option’ for Council Housing HOUSE OF COMMONS COUNCIL HOUSING GROUP Support for the ‘Fourth Option’ for Council Housing Report on the inquiry into the future funding of council housing 2004-2005 Preface by Austin Mitchell MP Forewords by: Derek Simpson, Amicus Dave Prentis, Unison Councillor Brian Huddless and Alan Walter Content s Members of Council Housing group: Austin Mitchell MP - Chair Forewords ....................................................1 Paul Holmes MP – Vice Chair Joe Benton MP Preface..........................................................2 Martin Caton MP Jeremy Corbyn MP Summary......................................................3 Harry Cohen MP Ann Cryer MP 1. Introduction ..........................................4 David Drew MP Frank Dobson MP 2. The case for the ‘Fourth Option’ ..........7 Mike Hancock MP Evan Harris MP 3. Local authorities – the overall picture..10 Steven Hepburn MP Kelvin Hopkins MP 4. Why councils are unable to finance Brian Iddon MP Lynne Jones MP improvements ....................................13 David Kidney MP John McDonnell MP 5. Post Transfer/ALMO experience..........17 Laura Moffat MP Ken Purchase MP 6. No proven benefits of separating Linda Riordan MP Bob Russell MP housing strategy and management ..24 Alan Simpson MP Dennis Skinner MP 7. Tenants denied real choice ..................26 David Taylor MP Des Turner MP 8. Conclusion ..........................................33 Joan Walley MP Stephen Williams MP 9. Recommendations ..............................37 10. Appendices..........................................38 The House of Commons Council Housing group would like to express special thanks to Amicus whose immediate offer of sponsorship made the production of this report possible and to GMB, UCATT and UNISON for additional financial support. We would particularly express thanks to Lesley Carty, Eileen Short, Alan Walter, John Allott, Olivia Fitch, Michael Cooke, Joy Millward, Umer Khan and Liza Coffin for helping with the research and production of the report. Our thanks also go out to all the tenants, councillors, trade unionists, council officers and many other individuals who provided evidence to our inquiry. Design & layout: smith+bell [email protected] Print: Russell Press, Nottingham [email protected] Forewords ince 1988 successive governments have he group has done a tremendous job promoted the privatisation of council compiling the case for council housing “Shousing. Tenants across the country are “T and the ‘fourth option’ in particular. continually told this is the only way to get invest- Elected councillors are constantly subjected to a ment to tackle urgent repairs and improve homes barrage of arguments, publications and seminars and estates. all aimed at getting us to accept the privatisation But ministers are facing growing opposition of our homes. Many authorities believe that from council tenants, local authorities, council- decent, affordable, secure and accountable lors, trade unions and MPs who are demanding Derek Simpson council housing is a public service worth direct investment by councils in homes and es- defending. It’s a view that Bolsover tenants tates. A few months ago the Labour party confer- overwhelmingly endorsed with a 97% majority ence voted overwhelmingly to oppose the in our recent consultation. The Bolsover privatisation of council housing. This sends a delegation that gave evidence at Parliament clear message that the government needs to re- involved councillors, tenants, trade union think its position. Local authorities provide a representatives and council officers. This report good service to tenants with a well-trained work- is an invaluable resource for councillors around force that ensures good levels of maintenance. the country who need the evidence and Council tenants should not be penalised for arguments to put the case – often in the face of choosing this service. Dave Prentis hostility from senior officers and perhaps Amicus, which represents over 15,000 work- colleagues over concerned at being ‘on message’ ers involved in the repair and maintenance of with government policy. This inquiry gave us the council houses, will continue to campaign hard opportunity to feel part of a strong national to ensure a full and fair debate over the future of movement to win the fourth option of direct council housing. We believe tenants deserve real investment. I hope that councillors in other choice – one that includes quality, affordable authorities will help make sure this report is homes that are managed and owned by their lo- widely read.” cally accountable council. Councillor Brian Huddless, Derek Simpson, general secretary Amicus Cabinet member for Regeneration & Strategy, Councillor Bolsover District Council NISON is proud to have supported Brian Huddless this inquiry into the real wishes of enants around Britain will welcome this “Ucouncil tenants and councils over the report. It will open the eyes of those future of the homes they live in and manage. “Twho haven’t heard the arguments ‘Choice’ and ‘responsiveness’ are the latest Gov- against privatisation or the case for the ‘fourth ernment buzz words for public service delivery. option’. It can sometimes seem hard to challenge Yet tenants and councils are not given choice – senior council officers and consultants promoting choice of landlord or direct investment into their privatisation who pretend they are the experts homes to provide them with the secure, high and their word is ‘fact’. But this report will give standard housing we all need for healthy, happy confidence to supporters of council housing. It lives. Against all the evidence that direct invest- Alan Walter will give more people the courage to stand up for ment would be cheaper and deliver faster im- decent, affordable, secure and accountable coun- provements, tenants, councils and housing cil housing – for us and future generations. workers are marched down the route of stock The Prime Minister has promised he is pre- transfer, ALMOs or PFI against their wishes. pared to listen. The message from council tenants That so many councils have held out against and supporters of council housing that comes transfer or privatisation is testament to the through this report cannot be clearer. I hope that strength of feeling amongst tenants and council- councillors, MPs and Ministers, busy as they are, lors. UNISON has campaigned hard for direct will find time to read this report. You will see that investment and will continue to support tenants council housing is worth defending and that the and local authorities who oppose transfer. This ‘fourth option’ is financially viable, socially bene- report shows without doubt that there is a gen- ficial and so makes political sense too! uine alternative. Alan Walter, Camden tenant and Dave Prentis, general secretary UNISON chair Defend Council Housing Support for the ‘Fourth Option’ for Council Housing 1 Preface s Chair of the Commons’ Council Hous- ‘big hitting’ ministers to undermine local politi- ing Group I regularly hear of abuses to cians, behaviour which I, like Stephen Byers find Acon council tenants into agreeing to pri- unacceptable. vatisation. I did not realise the enormity of it, With anti-transfer tenants and the GMB I pre- however, until I saw it in my own bailiwick, pared a four-sided newspaper to put the case North East Lincolnshire. There the Lib/Con against and warn the tenants. As soon as the coalition controlling the Council was carefully Council got wind of it, it brought the ballot for- tutored in tenant trickery by the ODPM’s “Task ward by two weeks. Large numbers had already Force”, the Trojan Horse of the huge private voted before they heard about any alternative. sector transfer industry which the ODPM has The Electoral Reform Society told me that they created. had no control over this dirty trick (which has The Council could meet the Decent Home by Austin Mitchell MP, been much used elsewhere). They kindly added standard with existing resources. We discovered chair of the House of that the overwhelming majority of voters cast an extra £500,000 a year being charged to the Commons ‘Council their ballots in the first four days. HRA for services payable from the General Housing’ group We lost. North East Lincolnshire’s Council Fund. The consultants recommended by the housing was all given away so I’m sure the ODPM did not point this out. Instead they rec- Council is grateful to the ODPM’s Task Force ommended an ill-defined ‘Decent Housing Plus’ for showing them how to pull these tricks – standard which they claimed could only be at- without, I hope, any reward to itself. However tained by privatisation. others are learning from our bitter experience. The Tenants’ Assembly (which 96% of ten- The Task Force has not been able to help the ants had never heard of) initially opposed this. Deputy PM pull the same stunt in Hull, where But lavish hospitality, visits, persuasions, purges, the Council is defying privatisation and refusing and the offer of three seats on the promised to foot the bill for the poisoned-tongue consult- Housing Association changed their mind. The ants. “tenants’ friend” adviser, TP21 agreed that pri- North East Lincs Council spent £343,700 vatisation wasn’t necessary and that tenants pre-ballot to promote stock transfer, £390,300 were perfectly happy but came out saying “pri- after it. It now has to pay £1.5 million over three vatise anyway”. years from the General Fund for services previ- The ODPM says tenants should hear both ously attributed to the HRA. Shoreline gets gov- sides of the argument. In North East Lincs the ernment ‘gap’ funding of up to £17 million, Council painted a glowing picture of the not-yet increased from an initial £6 million because the existent Housing Association as bringer of requirement that they show improving perform- model homes and gardens and orderly safe sus- ance as a landlord has now been abolished. Per- tainable communities. On the other hand, they haps the waste of all this public money to bring said we, the Council are crap. They reinforced in small amounts of more costly private sector that message with a huge glossy brochure and investment is par for the privatisation course.
Recommended publications
  • Appendix to Memorandum of Law on Behalf of United
    APPENDIX TO MEMORANDUM OF LAW ON BEHALF OF UNITED KINGDOM AND EUROPEAN PARLIAMENTARIANS AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION LIST OF AMICI HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND AND MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT House of Lords The Lord Ahmed The Lord Alderdice The Lord Alton of Liverpool, CB The Rt Hon the Lord Archer of Sandwell, QC PC The Lord Avebury The Lord Berkeley, OBE The Lord Bhatia, OBE The Viscount Bledisloe, QC The Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury The Rt Hon the Baroness Boothroyd, OM PC The Lord Borrie, QC The Rt Hon the Baroness Bottomley of Nettlestone, DL PC The Lord Bowness, CBE DL The Lord Brennan, QC The Lord Bridges, GCMG The Rt Hon the Lord Brittan of Spennithorne, QC DL PC The Rt Hon the Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville, CH PC The Viscount Brookeborough, DL The Rt Hon the Lord Browne-Wilkinson, PC The Lord Campbell of Alloway, ERD QC The Lord Cameron of Dillington The Rt Hon the Lord Cameron of Lochbroom, QC The Rt Rev and Rt Hon the Lord Carey of Clifton, PC The Lord Carlile of Berriew, QC The Baroness Chapman The Lord Chidgey The Lord Clarke of Hampstead, CBE The Lord Clement-Jones, CBE The Rt Hon the Lord Clinton-Davis, PC The Lord Cobbold, DL The Lord Corbett of Castle Vale The Rt Hon the Baroness Corston, PC The Lord Dahrendorf, KBE The Lord Dholakia, OBE DL The Lord Donoughue The Baroness D’Souza, CMG The Lord Dykes The Viscount Falkland The Baroness Falkner of Margravine The Lord Faulkner of Worcester The Rt Hon the
    [Show full text]
  • Women Mps in Westminster Photographs Taken May 21St, June 3Rd, June 4Th, 2008
    “The House of Commons Works of Art Collection documents significant moments in Parliamentary history. We are delighted to have added this unique photographic record of women MPs of today, to mark the 90th anniversary of women first being able to take their seats in this House” – Hugo Swire, Chairman, The Speaker's Advisory Committee on Works of Art. “The day the Carlton Club accepted women” – 90 years after women first got the vote aim to ensure that a more enduring image of On May 21st 2008 over half of all women women's participation in the political process Members of Parliament in Westminster survives. gathered party by party to have group photographs taken to mark the anniversary of Each party gave its permission for the 90 years since women first got the vote (in photographs to be taken. For the Labour February 1918 women over 30 were first Party, Barbara Follett MP, the then Deputy granted the vote). Minister for Women and Equality, and Barbara Keeley MP, who was Chair of the Labour Party Women’s Committee and The four new composite Caroline Adams, who works for the photographs taken party by Parliamentary Labour Party helped ensure that all but 12 of the Labour women party aim to ensure that a attended. more enduring image of For the Conservative women's participation in the Party, The Shadow Leader of the House of political process survives Commons and Shadow Minister for Until now the most often used photographic Women, Theresa May image of women MPs had been the so called MP and the Chairman “Blair Babes” picture taken on 7th May 1997 of the Conservative shortly after 101 Labour women were elected Party, Caroline to Westminster as a result of positive action by Spelman MP, enlisted the Labour Party.
    [Show full text]
  • British Journal of Political Science Too Spineless To
    British Journal of Political Science http://journals.cambridge.org/JPS Additional services for British Journal of Political Science: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here Too Spineless to Rebel? New Labour's Women MPs PHILIP COWLEY and SARAH CHILDS British Journal of Political Science / Volume 33 / Issue 03 / July 2003, pp 345 ­ 365 DOI: 10.1017/S0007123403000164, Published online: 01 August 2003 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0007123403000164 How to cite this article: PHILIP COWLEY and SARAH CHILDS (2003). Too Spineless to Rebel? New Labour's Women MPs. British Journal of Political Science, 33, pp 345­365 doi:10.1017/S0007123403000164 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/JPS, IP address: 128.6.218.72 on 29 Jan 2013 B.J.Pol.S. 33, 345–365 Copyright 2003 Cambridge University Press DOI: 10.1017/S0007123403000164 Printed in the United Kingdom Too Spineless to Rebel? New Labour’s Women MPs PHILIP COWLEY AND SARAH CHILDS* The 1997 British general election saw a record 120 women returned to the House of Commons, 101 of them Labour. Yet if the most striking feature of the 1997 intake into the House of Commons was the number of newly elected women, then the most striking feature of the backbench rebellions in that parliament was the lack of these women amongst the ranks of the rebels. They were less than half as likely to rebel against the party whip as the rest of the Parliamentary Labour Party; even those who did, did so around half as often.
    [Show full text]
  • Although Many European Radical Left Parties
    Peace, T. (2013) All I'm asking, is for a little respect: assessing the performance of Britain's most successful radical left party. Parliamentary Affairs, 66(2), pp. 405-424. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/144518/ Deposited on: 21 July 2017 Enlighten – Research publications by members of the University of Glasgow http://eprints.gla.ac.uk 2 All I’m asking, is for a little Respect: assessing the performance of Britain’s most successful radical left party BY TIMOTHY PEACE1 ABSTRACT This article offers an overview of the genesis, development and decline of the Respect Party, a rare example of a radical left party which has achieved some degree of success in the UK. It analyses the party’s electoral fortunes and the reasons for its inability to expand on its early breakthroughs in East London and Birmingham. Respect received much of its support from Muslim voters, although the mere presence of Muslims in a given area was not enough for Respect candidates to get elected. Indeed, despite criticism of the party for courting only Muslims, it did not aim to draw its support from these voters alone. Moreover, its reliance on young people and investment in local campaigning on specific political issues was often in opposition to the traditional ethnic politics which have characterised the electoral process in some areas. When the British public awoke on the morning of Friday 6th May 2005 most would have been unsurprised to discover that the Labour Party had clung on to power but with a reduced majority, as had been widely predicted.
    [Show full text]
  • Regime Change Or Disarming WMD?
    Jones 2/21/06 8:11 PM Page 62 62 Regime change or Legally, regime change and disarmament of Iraqi WMD via the United Nations were two disarming WMD? separate and different bases for war. We Blair’s know that it would not have been possible to get a legal agreement for war on the basis of contradictions regime change and this was made clear to Tony Blair in a letter from Jack Straw dated 25 March 2002. Tony Blair was told this again in July 2002 in the ‘Downing Street Lynne Jones Memo’. This records that the Attorney- General told the Prime Minister that the desire for regime change was not a legal base for military action. Yet, in his evidence to your inquiry, Tony Blair tries to ‘merge’ the two distinct rationales for going to war: ‘I think there is a danger that we end up with a very sort of binary distinction between regime change here and WMD here.’ He continued with this point as he was questioned further: ‘It is more a different way of expressing the same proposition. The Americans in a sense were saying, “We are for regime change Lynne Jones was, until because we don’t trust he is ever going to April 2010, the give up his WMD ambitions”. We were distinguished Member of saying, “We have to deal with his WMD Parliament for ambitions. If that means regime change, so be it”.’ Birmingham Selly Oak. This excerpt is from her I urge the Inquiry panel to consider this detailed submission to the very closely.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Delegates
    West Midlands HECA Forum Towards a West Midlands Energy Strategy List of Attendees NAME ORGANISATION Adrian Gill Stafford Borough Council Alan Kirk Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council Alan Pither Energy Efficiency Consultant Angie Madden Wolverhampton City Council Angie Nicholls EAGA Anna Wardell Bromsgrove District Council Bryan Roberts Worcester City Council Chris Banks Powergen Plc Chris Endacott GFleet Services Chris Winter Telford Council Christina Parker Staffordshire Housing Association Claire Robinson Staffordshire Housing Association Cynthia Cupido Birmingham City Council Dave Hull Powergen Plc David Giddings Worcester City Council Debbie King Tamworth Borough Council Don Wright Redditch Borough Council Dr Lynne Jones MP Birmingham Selly Oak Elizabeth Alston Worcestershire County Council Ellie Cooper Central Midlands EEAC Emma Pearson Central Midlands EEAC Geoff Herbert Smethwick Energy Action Ltd Glen Lewars Smethwick Energy Action Ltd Graham Jones South Shropshire Council Heather Watts Scottish Power Helen Atkins UK HECA Fora Secretariat Hugh Moreton Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council Jane Poxon British Gas John E Burns Birmingham City Council John Gallagher JSL Insulation Karen Gilliatt Stafford Borough Council Karen Hurrell Warwickshire EEAC Karen Johnston Coventry City Council Kate Cannaby Bridgnorth District Council Keith Bennett Central Midlands EEAC Les Craggs Oswestry Borough Council Lisa Trickett Birmingham City Council Loraine Bassett British Gas Lucy Southgate IT Power Mark Currie Ideal Boilers Martyn Hammond Birmingham
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix: “Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in the British Parliament”
    Appendix: \Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in the British Parliament" August 8, 2017 Appendix Table of Contents • Appendix A: Wordscores Estimation of Ideology • Appendix B: MP Membership in Ideological Groups • Appendix C: Rebellion on Different Types of Divisions • Appendix D: Models of Rebellion on Government Sponsored Bills Only • Appendix E: Differences in Labour Party Rebellion Following Leadership Change • Appendix F: List of Party Switchers • Appendix G: Discussion of Empirical Model Appendix A: Wordscores Estimation of Ideology This Appendix describes our method for ideologically scaling British MPs using their speeches on the welfare state, which were originally produced for a separate study on welfare reform (O'Grady, 2017). We cover (i) data collection, (ii) estimation, (iii) raw results, and (iv) validity checks. The resulting scales turn out to be highly valid, and provide an excellent guide to MPs' ideologies using data that is completely separate to the voting data that forms the bulk of the evidence in our paper. A1: Collection of Speech Data Speeches come from an original collection of every speech made about issues related to welfare in the House of Commons from 1987-2007, covering the period over which the Labour party moved 1 to the center under Tony Blair, adopted and enacted policies of welfare reform, and won office at the expense of the Conservatives. Restricting the speeches to a single issue area is useful for estimating ideologies because with multiple topics there is a danger of conflating genuine extremism (a tendency to speak in extreme ways) with a tendency or requirement to talk a lot about topics that are relatively extreme to begin with (Lauderdale and Herzog, 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Michell R H. Inositol Phospholipids and Cell Surface Receptor Function
    This Week’s Citation Classic® DECEMBER 12, 1988 Michell R H. Inositol phospholipids and cell surface receptor function. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 415:81-147, 1975. [Department of Biochemistry. University of Birmingham. Englanill By the mid-i2~ 970s, it was clear that a rise in cvtoplas- AMP. We then recognised that it always coincided mic Ca concentration is an essential component or with receptor-activated mobilization of ~ within many of the responses of cells to hormones, neuro- stimulated cells. Once we were sure that receptor-ac- transmitters, and other extracellular stimuli, It then be- tivated inositol lipid hydrolysis was not caused by came clear that the same stimuli invariably enhance the mobilized Ca°~,there were only two possibili2~ - the turnover of inositol phospholipids. In this review ties: either inositol lipid hydrolysis and Ca mobi- article, I developed the idea, which has since been lization were unrelated2~ events or inositol lipid hy- proved correct, that receptor-triggered inositol lipid drolysis caused Ca mobilization. We elected the hydrolysis is a transmembrane signalling2~ reaction that latter as the more parsimonious and experimentally causes the mobilization of Ca within stimulated testable working model; and it was written up, sent cells. [The SCI~indicates that this paper has been to Nature, and rejected. At that time I fortunately cited in over 1755 publications.] had deferred my response to an invitation to write for Biochimica et Biophysica Acta’s Biomembrane Reviews. Coincidence of the new ideas with the im- pending arrival of a baby provoked me to write my p - review in the summer of 1974, so our idea first ap- peared in 1975 as the central conclusion of an ex- tensive review article rather than asa brief letter.
    [Show full text]
  • Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Nhs Foundation Trust
    BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL MENTAL HEALTH NHS FOUNDATION TRUST MINUTES OF THE ASSEMBLY OF GOVERNORS MEETING HELD ON WEDNESDAY 27th MAY AT UFFCULME CENTRE, MOSELEY In Attendance Governors: Sally Selvey Nursing Staff Governor Asaf Khan Medial Staff Governor Vinodrai Mehta Other and AHP Staff Governor Naomi Hawkins Non-Clinical Staff Governor Joe Aldred Birmingham East and North Public Governor Renganathan Ramamoorthy Birmingham East and North Public Governor Bernadette Murray South Birmingham Public Governor Sat Pal Heart of Birmingham Public Governor Kenneth Jeffers Heart of Birmingham Public Governor Brian Sheppard Solihull Public Governor John Robinson Service Users - BEN Peter Brown Solihull Service User Governor Loris Tapper Carer Governor Lawrence Innis Carer Governor June Green Carer Governor Anne McKenzie Carer Governor Charles Zuckerman Local Medical Committee Stakeholder Governor Robin Felton Alzheimer’s Society Stakeholder Governor Lynne Jones MP Stakeholder Governor Peter Lea Stakeholder – Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council Carl Foulkes West Midlands Police Stakeholder Governor Trust Staff: Peter Marquis Chairman Karen Martin Deputy Chief Executive / Director of Organisational Workforce Development Ros Alstead Executive Director of Nursing David Boden Non-Executive Director Stella Layton Non-Executive Director Alison Lord Non-Executive Director Gill Harrad Trust Solicitor Georgina Dean Director of Finance Rachael Vowles Director of Communications & Marketing Charlotte Maybury Executive Assistant (Notes) Laura Hollingsworth Foundation
    [Show full text]
  • Enclosure 1 Page 1 of 9 BIRMINGHAM and SOLIHULL
    Enclosure 1 BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL MENTAL HEALTH NHS FOUNDATION TRUST MINUTES OF THE ASSEMBLY OF GOVERNORS MEETING HELD ON THURSDAY 3rd JUNE 2010, 1030-1500 AT UFFCULME CENTRE, MOSELEY, BIRMINGHAM In Attendance Governors: Sally Selvey Staff Governor - Nursing Asaf Khan Staff Governor – Medical Darren Cooper Staff Governor – Nursing John Robinson Service User Governor – BEN Peter Brown Service User Governor - Solihull Faheem Uddin Service User Governor – HoB Lynda Smith Service User Governor – South Elsie Gayle Service User Governor – Rest of England & Wales Anne McKenzie Carer Governor Loris Tapper Carer Governor Sue Nixon Stakeholder Governor - PCT Commissioners Lynne Jones Stakeholder Governor - MP Jane Morel Stakeholder Governor – Terrance Higgins Trust Ann Davis Stakeholder Governor – University Birmingham Peter Lea Stakeholder Governor – Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council Tessa Griffiths Stakeholder Governor – Future Health & Social Care Renganathan Ramamoorthy Public Governor – BEN Brian Sheppard Public Governor – Solihull Maureen Johnson Public Governor – Solihull Joe Aldred Public Governor – BEN Bridie Nugent Public Governor - South Trust Staff: Peter Marquis Chairman Sue Turner Chief Executive Peter Lewis Executive Medical Director Georgina Dean Director of Finance Frances Allcock Director of Organisational Development & Performance Improvement Denise Wilson Director of Quality Improvement & Patient Experience Sarah Smith Senior Communications & Marketing Manager Jonathan Lloyd Director of Strategic Delivery – AWA Glynis
    [Show full text]
  • Dairy Farmers of Britain
    House of Commons Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee Dairy Farmers of Britain Fifth Report of Session 2009–10 Volume II Oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 10 March 2010 HC 227-II Incorporating HC 971-i–iv, Session 2008–09 Published on 25 March 2010 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee The Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and its associated bodies. Current membership Mr Michael Jack (Conservative, Fylde) (Chairman) Mr Geoffrey Cox (Conservative, Torridge & West Devon) Mr David Drew (Labour, Stroud) Mr James Gray (Conservative, North Wiltshire) Patrick Hall (Labour, Bedford) Lynne Jones (Labour, Birmingham, Selly Oak) David Lepper (Labour, Brighton Pavilion) Miss Anne McIntosh (Conservative, Vale of York) Dan Rogerson (Liberal Democrat, North Cornwall) Sir Peter Soulsby (Labour, Leicester South) Dr Gavin Strang (Labour, Edinburgh East) Paddy Tipping (Labour, Sherwood) Mr Roger Williams (Liberal Democrat, Brecon & Radnorshire) David Taylor MP (Labour, North West Leicestershire) was a member of the Committee during this inquiry. Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No. 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/efracom Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Richard Cooke (Clerk), Simon Fiander (Second Clerk), Sarah Coe (Committee Specialist—Environment), Joanna Dodd (Inquiry Manager), Clare Genis (Senior Committee Assistant), Briony Potts and Mandy Sullivan (Committee Assistants).
    [Show full text]
  • Collectived Working Papers
    0 CollectivED Working Papers Working Papers from CollectivED; the Hub for Mentoring and Coaching May 2019 A University Research and Practice Centre where we Create Communicate Connect Collaborate Contribute 1 CONTENTS PAGE Rachel Lofthouse Editorial; Welcome to CollectivED Issue 8 3-4 1 Daveena Patel Cognitive coaching for professional development of early career 5-10 teachers, are there any links? A research working paper. 2 Kulvarn Atwal The Thinking School – The value of Coaching. A research 11-17 working paper. 3 Cameron Paterson and Coaching for a Culture of Thinking. A practice insight working 18-24 Chris Munro paper. 4 Götz Schwab and Fostering Research Orientation in an International Setting in 25-30 Mareike Oesterle Language Teacher Education. A research working paper. 5 Rachel Lofthouse and Developing a model of Contextualised Specialist Coaching to 31-38 Anthea Rose support school improvement. A research working paper. 6 Laura Anthony ‘Inside-Out’ coaching – how a new understanding of the mind 39-43 re-framed our vision of Well-being. A practice insight working paper. 7 Steven Tones, Luke Jones Peer coaching as a CollectivPE (in writing for an academic 44-48 and Gethin Foulkes purpose). A practice insight working paper. 8 Lisa Murtagh Working Collaboratively to Support Mentor Development. A 49-54 practice insight working paper. 9 Nimish Lad The staffroom: the long forgotten CPD resource. A think piece 55-57 working paper. 10 Steve Burton Book Review of ‘A quick guide to video coaching’ by 58-59 Jim Thompson and Casey Kosiorek (2018) 11 Lynne Jones Enquiring into online teaching practice: using Coaching 60-67 Dimensions as a metacognitive tool.
    [Show full text]