DOCSLIB.ORG

Physical and Hydrochemical Evidence of Lake Leakage Near Jim

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Physical and Hydrochemical Evidence of Lake Leakage Near Jim Physical and Hydrochemical Evidence of Lake Leakage near Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam and of Ground-Water Inflow to Lake Seminole, and an Assessment of Karst Features in and near the Lake, Southwestern Georgia and Northwestern Florida Prepared in cooperation with the Georgia Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5084 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover photographs, clockwise from top left: Boat-mounted acoustic Doppler current profiling apparatus in use near the River Boil; looking north from Apalachicola River toward Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam in background. Photograph by Lynn J. Torak, U.S. Geological Survey River Boil on Apalachicola River, about 900 feet downstream of Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, near Chattahoochee, Florida. Photograph by Lynn J. Torak, U.S. Geological Survey Vortex flow entering sinkhole in the bottom on Lake Seminole at a depth from about 8 to 10 feet, located along the western shore of the lake about one-half mile from Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam near Sneads, Florida. Photograph by Harley Means, Florida Geological Survey Nonisokinetic thief sampler (Van Dorn sampler) in use at State Dock Spring on Flint River impoundment arm of Lake Seminole, Bainbridge, Georgia. Photograph by Lynn J. Torak, U.S. Geological Survey Physical and Hydrochemical Evidence of Lake Leakage near Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam and of Ground-Water Inflow to Lake Seminole, and an Assessment of Karst Features in and near the Lake, Southwestern Georgia and Northwestern Florida By Lynn J. Torak, Dianna M. Crilley, and Jaime A. Painter Prepared in cooperation with the Georgia Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division Scientific Investigations Report 2005–5084 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior P. Lynn Scarlett, Acting Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2006 This report is a Web-only publication: pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2005/5084/ For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Torak, L.J., Crilley, D.M., and Painter, J.A., 2006, Physical and hydrochemical evidence of lake leakage near Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam and of ground-water inflow to Lake Seminole, and an assessment of karst features in and near the lake, southwestern Georgia and northwestern Florida: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5084, 90 p. iii Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction..................................................................................................................................................... 2 Purpose and Scope .............................................................................................................................. 3 Previous Studies ................................................................................................................................... 4 Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................................ 4 Study Area.............................................................................................................................................. 5 Climate ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Physiography and Drainage ....................................................................................................... 7 Geologic Framework ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Hydrogeologic Framework ........................................................................................................................... 11 Hydrochemistry .............................................................................................................................................. 13 Physical Evidence of Lake Leakage near Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam and of Ground- Water Inflow to the Lake ................................................................................................................. 15 Comparison of Ground-Water Levels with Lake and Stream Stage ............................................ 15 Results of Dye-Tracing Experiments and Acoustic Doppler Current Profiling ........................... 22 Streamflow Gain along Spring Creek ................................................................................................ 24 Water-Temperature Variation at In-Lake and Off-Channel Springs ............................................. 25 Geologists’ Accounts of Limestone-Dissolution Features Found during Site Exploration and Dam Construction ....................................................................................... 28 Hydrochemical Evidence of Lake Leakage and Ground-Water Inflow to Lake Seminole ................. 34 Water-Chemistry Sampling ................................................................................................................. 34 Physical and Chemical Properties ..................................................................................................... 35 Ground-Water Chemistry ..................................................................................................................... 35 Surface-Water Chemistry .................................................................................................................... 38 Springflow Chemistry ........................................................................................................................... 40 Solute-Tracer Analysis ......................................................................................................................... 40 Radon-222...................................................................................................................................... 41 Deuterium and Oxygen-18 Stable Isotopes ............................................................................ 41 Isotope Mixing-Model Results ........................................................................................................... 43 Assessment of Limestone Dissolution and Potential for Lake Leakage into Karst Features Underlying Lake Seminole ............................................................................................................. 45 Calcite-Saturation Indices .................................................................................................................. 45 Remote-Sensing Techniques and Interactive Map ......................................................................... 47 Instructions to Download, Install, and Use Interactive Map ................................................ 47 Comparison of Preimpoundment Aerial Photographs with Mapped Navigational Features .................................................................................................. 48 Comparison of Preimpoundment Aerial Photographs with Hydrographic Surveys ......... 52 Physical and Hydrochemical Factors Affecting Leakage Potential and Sinkhole Collapse .................................................................................................................... 55 Monitoring Changes in Physical and Hydrochemical Components of the Flow System to Evaluate Lake Leakage .................................................................................................................... 55 Conclusions..................................................................................................................................................... 56 Literature Cited ............................................................................................................................................... 58 Appendix.......................................................................................................................................................... 63 iv Figures 1–2. Maps Showing— �� Location of study area, Lake Seminole, boundaries of the lower Apalachicola– Chattahoochee–Flint River Basin, and physiographic districts of the Coastal Plain province .......................................................................................................... 2 2. Physiographic divisions and drainage features of the Lake Seminole study area .... 5 3. Graph showing precipitation and air temperature for Colquitt, Georgia .............................. 6 4. Chart showing geologic and hydrologic units in the Lake Seminole study area and general description of ground-water chemistry of water-bearing units .............................. 8 5. Hydrostratigraphic sections A–A’ and B–B ’ and locations of wells used to construct sections through the Lake Seminole study area ..................................................... 12 6. Conceptual diagram of ground-water and surface-water flow in the interconnected
Load more

Recommended publications
  • COMPARISON of PRE- and POST- MPOUNDMENT GROUND-WATER LEVELS NEAR the WOODRUFF LOCK and DAM SITE, JACKSON COUNTY, FLORIDA Phillip N
    COMPARISON OF PRE- AND POST- MPOUNDMENT GROUND-WATER LEVELS NEAR THE WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM SITE, JACKSON COUNTY, FLORIDA Phillip N. Albertson AUTHOR: Hydrologist, U.S. Geological Survey, 3039 An-miler Road, Suite 130, Peachtree Business Center, Atlanta, GA 30360-2824. REFERENCE: Procet.dings of the 2001 Georgia Water Resources Conference, held March 26 - 27, 2001, at The University of Georgia, Kathryn J. Hatcher, editor, Institute of Ecology, The University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia. Abstract. In 1999, the U.S. Geological Survey The effect of filling the reservoir on ground-water (USGS) and the Georgia Department of Natural levels also is indicated by long-term water-level data Resources, Environmental Protection Division, began a from a well near Lake Seminole in Florida. Sporadic, cooperative study to investigate the hydrology and long-term water-level measurements began at this well hydrogeology of the Lake Seminole area, southwestern in 1950 and have continued during filling of the Georgia, and northwestern Florida. Lake Seminole is a reservoir (1954-1957) until 1982. These data indicate 37,500-acre impoundment that was created in 1954 by that the water level in this well has risen more than 10 the construction of the Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam feet since the filling of the reservoir. Prior to filling, the just south of the confluence of the Chattahoochee and hydraulic gradient at this location sloped east and Flint Rivers (fig. 1). Recent negotiations between the northeast to the Chattahoochee River. Now it slopes in a States of Alabama, Florida, and Georgia over water- southerly direction near the western end of Jim allocation rights have brought attention to the need for a Woodruff Lock and Dam and to the Apalachicola River.
    [Show full text]
  • Suwannee River State Park
    HISTORY AND NATURE SUWANNEE RIVER The park contains over 1,800 acres of natural STATE PARK Florida with many features such as sinks, streams, 3631 201st Path SUWANNEE RIVER springs, limestone outcroppings and the rivers. Live Oak, FL 32060 STATE PARK The park has an abundance of plant and animal 386-362-2746 species including gopher tortoise, fox, deer, song Where the scenic Withlacoochee birds, wildflowers and diverse native forests. The joins the historic Suwannee protected Gulf Sturgeon and other fishes and reptiles are abundant in the river. PARK GUIDELINES Early use by Native Americans dates back some • Hours are 8 a.m. until sunset, 365 days a year. 12,000 years. While under Spanish control, the • An entrance fee is required. passage of De Soto’s party occurred in 1540. During • All plants, animals and park property are 1818 Andrew Jackson lead American forces through protected. Collection, destruction or disturbance this area searching for Indian strongholds, believed is prohibited. responsible for raiding settlers. • Pets are permitted in designated areas only. Pets Vestiges of history in the park show how important must be kept on a handheld leash no longer the Suwannee River was to Florida history. One can than six feet and well-behaved at all times. find an earthworks mound built during the Civil • Fishing, boating and fires are allowed in War to defend the railroad crossing that supplied designated areas only. A Florida fishing license confederate troops. The Battle of Olustee in may be required. February 1864 turned back Union forces heading west to destroy this bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Unsuuseuracsbe
    StRd Opelika 85 Junction City HARRIS StRte 96 Geneva StRte 90 96 37 s te e 1 ran TALBOT tR t te S tR e y S V w DISTRICT e 96 Fort Valley 2 Montrose k t 1 S P tR te 96 1 S StR (M TWIGGS e t on Rd iami Valley Rd t R Mac ) R 6 t 2 d Reynolds e 9 S Dublin 9 8 StRt StRte 80 96 StRte 96 Smiths 80 8 PEACH LEE 2 lt Butler 9 S 1 A tR 4 319 7 e t t e StRte 112 2 e MACON t Dudley y DISTRICT 2 R Armour Rd w TAYLOR t R (EmRd 200) SH t StRte 278 Bibb U 4 7 S TAYLOR S 16 0 3 City Upatoi Cr 1 129 11 e t R S t t S 109th Congress of the United StatesR StRte 112 t 32nd (EmRd 200) e MUSCOGEE 3 Phenix G St Reese Rd 6 3 o 2 2 8 Edgewood Rd l 1 e City Forest Rd d 1 Rt e t COLUMBUS 127 e S n t StRte R I t Steam Mill Rd s S Wickham Dr l e Columbus Marshallville 341 s StR te H S w te 2 t R tR Dexter Ladonia Merval Rd 1 te S 1 7 te 127 S y V 185 2 t Rt tRt e 247 ic 2nd Armored Division Rd 7 tR e 127 S t (S o ) S t 0 137 Rte 90) S r Wolf Cr t 57 y 4 d S Perry Rte 2 Upatoi Cr 2 R D tR r e e t t i StRte 41 StRte e 9 StRte n 0 R 23 t n S 126 t S o StRte 6 R StRte 117 R 2 t ( (Airp 1 ) e Rentz o Rd Chester 27 Fort Benning Military Res rt 3 StRte 128 Whitson Rd 4 Cochran 3 22 8 te R TAYLOR Ideal t CHATTAHOOCHEE S MARION StRte 117 StR USHwy 441 Fort Benning te 9 S 0 StRte 26 7 South t Rte 19 129 BLECKLEY 5 Cadwell 13 7 2 7 te 1 RUSSELL StRte 2 StRte 49 HOUSTON tR 1 40 P S e Buena Vista er t StR ry tR te 26 Hwy S S StRt Cusseta tR e 2 te Oglethorpe 6 ( oad 9 26 Montezuma Fire R 00) B u r S n t R t StRte 126 6 B 2 te DISTRICT r S e ) 3 g Hawkinsville t t e R StR 9 r 2 9
    [Show full text]
  • Streamflow Maps of Georgia's Major Rivers
    GEORGIA STATE DIVISION OF CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINING AND GEOLOGY GARLAND PEYTON, Director THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Information Circular 21 STREAMFLOW MAPS OF GEORGIA'S MAJOR RIVERS by M. T. Thomson United States Geological Survey Prepared cooperatively by the Geological Survey, United States Department of the Interior, Washington, D. C. ATLANTA 1960 STREAMFLOW MAPS OF GEORGIA'S MAJOR RIVERS by M. T. Thomson Maps are commonly used to show the approximate rates of flow at all localities along the river systems. In addition to average flow, this collection of streamflow maps of Georgia's major rivers shows features such as low flows, flood flows, storage requirements, water power, the effects of storage reservoirs and power operations, and some comparisons of streamflows in different parts of the State. Most of the information shown on the streamflow maps was taken from "The Availability and use of Water in Georgia" by M. T. Thomson, S. M. Herrick, Eugene Brown, and others pub­ lished as Bulletin No. 65 in December 1956 by the Georgia Department of Mines, Mining and Geo­ logy. The average flows reported in that publication and sho\vn on these maps were for the years 1937-1955. That publication should be consulted for detailed information. More recent streamflow information may be obtained from the Atlanta District Office of the Surface Water Branch, Water Resources Division, U. S. Geological Survey, 805 Peachtree Street, N.E., Room 609, Atlanta 8, Georgia. In order to show the streamflows and other features clearly, the river locations are distorted slightly, their lengths are not to scale, and some features are shown by block-like patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 3:07-Md-00001-PAM-JRK Document 376 Filed 07/21/10 Page 1 of 26
    Case 3:07-md-00001-PAM-JRK Document 376 Filed 07/21/10 Page 1 of 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA In re Tri-State Water Rights Litigation Case No. 3:07-md-01 (PAM/JRK) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER In Phase 2 of this Multi-District Litigation (“MDL”), the Court must evaluate the actions of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (the “Corps”) in light of the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq., the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq., and other similar statutes. Phase 1 of the litigation involved challenges to the Corps’s operations at the northernmost dam and reservoir in the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint (“ACF”) river basin. Phase 2 challenges those operations at the southernmost dam in the system, the Jim Woodruff Dam, which is located on the Apalachicola River at the border of Georgia and Florida. The parties in this Phase are: the states of Alabama, Florida, and Georgia; the Southeastern Federal Power Customers (“SeFPC”); the cities of Apalachicola, Florida, and Atlanta, Columbus, and Gainesville, Georgia; the Georgia counties of Gwinnett, DeKalb, and Fulton; the Atlanta Regional Commission (“ARC”); the Cobb County-Marietta Water Authority; the Board of Water Commissioners of Columbus, Georgia, doing business as the Columbus Water Works (“CWW”); the Lake Lanier Association;1 the Alabama Power 1 The Court will refer to Atlanta, Gainesville, Gwinnett County, DeKalb County, Fulton County, the ARC, the Cobb County-Marietta Water Authority, and the Lake Lanier Association collectively as “the Georgia parties.” The city of Columbus and the CWW Case 3:07-md-00001-PAM-JRK Document 376 Filed 07/21/10 Page 2 of 26 Company (“APC”); the Apalachicola Bay and River Keeper, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Consumption Guidelines: Rivers & Creeks
    FRESHWATER FISH CONSUMPTION GUIDELINES: RIVERS & CREEKS NO RESTRICTIONS ONE MEAL PER WEEK ONE MEAL PER MONTH DO NOT EAT NO DATA Bass, LargemouthBass, Other Bass, Shoal Bass, Spotted Bass, Striped Bass, White Bass, Bluegill Bowfin Buffalo Bullhead Carp Catfish, Blue Catfish, Channel Catfish,Flathead Catfish, White Crappie StripedMullet, Perch, Yellow Chain Pickerel, Redbreast Redhorse Redear Sucker Green Sunfish, Sunfish, Other Brown Trout, Rainbow Trout, Alapaha River Alapahoochee River Allatoona Crk. (Cobb Co.) Altamaha River Altamaha River (below US Route 25) Apalachee River Beaver Crk. (Taylor Co.) Brier Crk. (Burke Co.) Canoochee River (Hwy 192 to Lotts Crk.) Canoochee River (Lotts Crk. to Ogeechee River) Casey Canal Chattahoochee River (Helen to Lk. Lanier) (Buford Dam to Morgan Falls Dam) (Morgan Falls Dam to Peachtree Crk.) * (Peachtree Crk. to Pea Crk.) * (Pea Crk. to West Point Lk., below Franklin) * (West Point dam to I-85) (Oliver Dam to Upatoi Crk.) Chattooga River (NE Georgia, Rabun County) Chestatee River (below Tesnatee Riv.) Chickamauga Crk. (West) Cohulla Crk. (Whitfield Co.) Conasauga River (below Stateline) <18" Coosa River <20" 18 –32" (River Mile Zero to Hwy 100, Floyd Co.) ≥20" >32" <18" Coosa River <20" 18 –32" (Hwy 100 to Stateline, Floyd Co.) ≥20" >32" Coosa River (Coosa, Etowah below <20" Thompson-Weinman dam, Oostanaula) ≥20" Coosawattee River (below Carters) Etowah River (Dawson Co.) Etowah River (above Lake Allatoona) Etowah River (below Lake Allatoona dam) Flint River (Spalding/Fayette Cos.) Flint River (Meriwether/Upson/Pike Cos.) Flint River (Taylor Co.) Flint River (Macon/Dooly/Worth/Lee Cos.) <16" Flint River (Dougherty/Baker Mitchell Cos.) 16–30" >30" Gum Crk.
    [Show full text]
  • Okefenokee Swamp Hydrology
    OKEFENOKEE SWAMP HYDROLOGY Cynthia S. Loftin' AUTHOR: 'Graduate Research Assistant-Ph.D. Candidate, USGS-BRD Florida Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-0450. REFERENCE: Proceedings of the 1997 Georgia Water Resources Conference, held 20-22 March 1997, at the University of Georgia, Kathryn J. Hatcher, Editor, Institute of Ecology, The University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia. Abstract. The Okefenokee Swamp is one of North topographic relief is minimal The swamp is a bowl-like America's largest freshwater wetlands. Swamp hydrology depression in the landscape with the trend in ground surface is largely controlled by precipitation and elevation from 38.4 m at Kingfisher Landing in the evapotranspiration; regional topographic features of the Northeast to 33.0 m in the area where the Suwannee River swamp control surface water movements. Manipulations to exits the swamp in the West to 34.75 m at Ellicott's Mound the swamp topography and vegetation communities during in the Southeast near the St. Mary's River outflow. Within this century have affected water movement and variability the swamp are regional topographic highs on large sand- in parts of the swamp. Changes in swamp hydrology since based islands and lows in large prairies. The prairies also the construction of the Suwannee River Sill are generally contain local topographic highs on peat-based islands that restricted to the West Central area bounded by the Pocket, may rise a meter above the surrounding inundated peat Billy's Island, Craven's Island, Minnie's Island, and surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Quick Reference Fact Sheet
    Okefenokee at a Glance The Okefenokee Swamp is located in Ware, Charlton, and Clinch Counties, Georgia and Baker County, Florida. Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge was established by Executive Order in 1936. The Okefenokee Swamp covers 438,000 acres. It is 38 miles in length at its longest point by 25 miles in width at its widest point. The swamp is approximately 700 square miles. The Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge is over 402,000 acres. The wilderness area consists of 353,981 acres and was created by the Okefenokee Wilderness Act of 1974 which is part of the Wilderness Preservation System. Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge is the largest National Wildlife Refuge in the eastern United States. It is administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service which is under the Department of the Interior. The Okefenokee Swamp is approximately 7000 years old. It is a vast peat-filled bog inside a huge, saucer-shaped depression that was once part of the ocean floor. The elevation of the swamp varies. There is a 25 foot drop from the northwest side to the southwest side. The range in elevation is from 128 feet above sea level on the northeast side to 103 feet on the southwest side. The vegetative indicator of the natural swamp line is the presence of the saw palmetto. The Suwannee River is the principle outlet of the swamp. The Suwannee flows from the west side of the swamp and empties into the Gulf of Mexico near Cedar Key, Florida. The Suwannee River is 280 miles long. A small area of the southeastern part of the swamp is drained by the St.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Analysis of Critical Habitat Designation for the Fat Threeridge, Shinyrayed Pocketbook, Gulf Moccasinshell, Ochlockonee
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF CRITICAL HABITAT DESIGNATION FOR THE FAT THREERIDGE, SHINYRAYED POCKETBOOK, GULF MOCCASINSHELL, OCHLOCKONEE MOCCASINSHELL, OVAL PIGTOE, CHIPOLA SLABSHELL, AND PURPLE BANKCLIMBER Draft Final Report | September 12, 2007 prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 4401 N. Fairfax Drive Arlington, VA 22203 prepared by: Industrial Economics, Incorporated 2067 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02140 Draft – September 12, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1T SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION AND FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYSIS 1-1 1.1 Purpose of the Economic Analysis 1-1 1.2 Background 1-2 1.3 Regulatory Alternatives 1-9 1.4 Threats to the Species and Habitat 1-9 1.5 Approach to Estimating Economic Effects 1-9 1.6 Scope of the Analysis 1-13 1.7 Analytic Time Frame 1-16 1.8 Information Sources 1-17 1.9 Structure of Report 1-18 SECTION 2 POTENTIAL CHANGES IN WATER USE AND MANAGEMENT FOR CONSERVATION OF THE SEVEN MUSSELS 2-1 2.1 Summary of Methods for Estimation of Economic Impacts Associated with Flow- Related Conservation Measures 2-2 2.2 Water Use in Proposed Critical Habitat Areas 2-3 2.3 Potential Changes in Water Use in the Flint River Basin 2-5 2.4 Potential Changes in Water Management in the Apalachicola River Complex (Unit 8) 2-10 2.5 Potential Changes in Water Management in the Santa Fe River Complex (Unit 11) 2-22 SECTION 3 POTENTIAL ECONOMIC IMPACTS RELATED TO CHANGES IN WATER USE AND MANAGEMENT 3-1 3.1 Summary 3-6 3.2 Potential Economic Impacts Related to Agricultural Water Uses 3-7 3.3 Potential Economic Impacts Related
    [Show full text]
  • DIRECT TESTIMONY of PHILIP B. BEDIENT, Ph.D., P.E
    No. 142, Original In The Supreme Court of the United States STATE OF FLORIDA, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF GEORGIA, Defendant. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF PHILIP B. BEDIENT, Ph.D., P.E. October 26, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY OF OPINIONS .......................................................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND AND PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS .................................................. 6 ANY CHANGE IN THE AMOUNT OR TIMING OF STATE-LINE FLOW MUST BE COORDINATED AND EXECUTED BY THE CORPS ............................................................... 7 I. The Corps Operates the Federal Reservoir Projects in the ACF Basin as a Single, Integrated System to Balance Multiple Project Purposes ................................................... 9 II. The RIOP Controls Basin-Wide Storage and Releases of Water in the Federal Reservoirs ......................................................................................................................... 17 III. The Corps Operates Its Reservoir System as a Single Unit, and Under Low-Flow Conditions Offsets Increased Flint River Flows by Decreasing Chattahoochee River Releases ................................................................................................................... 25 IV. Increases in Basin Inflow Would Not Increase State-Line Flows into Florida During Low-Flow Conditions or Drought Operations...................................................... 26 REDUCTIONS IN GEORGIA’S WATER USE WOULD NOT RESULT IN INCREASED STATE-LINE FLOWS
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Seminole Hydrilla Action Plan: Development and Implementation
    LAKE SEMINOLE HYDRILLA ACTION PLAN: DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION Michael J. Eubanks' and Donald M. Morgan' AUTHORS: 'U.S. Army Corps of Eneineers, Mobile District, P.O. Box 2288. Mobile, AL 36628-0001; and 2U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Lake Seminole, P.O. Box 96, Chattahoochee, FL 32324. REFERENCE: Proceedings of the 2001 Georgia Water Resources Conference, held March 26-27, 2001, at, the University of Georgia. Kathryn J. Hatcher, editor, Institute of Ecology.. the University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia. Abstract. This paper describes an effort by the U.S. a decrease in adjacent property values. Hydrilla, the Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to manage the current major problem plant, was discovered on the invasive aquatic plant Hydrilla verticillata (hydrilla). lake in 1967. Based on a 1997 survey, this non-native This plant causes serious water resource problems such plant dominates the submersed plant community, which as adverse impacts to small boat navigation, water covers approximately 13,400 acres (40% lakewide), of quality, fish and wildlife habitat, water-borne the lake. Total aquatic plant coverage on the lake was recreation, and hydropower production. An integrated approximately 55% (with significant arms of the lake management plan, including several traditional under almost 90% coverage). A number of aquatic chemical, biological, and mechanical methods, was plant management techniques have been utilized since developed to address reducing the coverage of hydrilla project construction in 1957, including chemical on the lake and to enhance restoration of mixed native (herbicides), biological, and mechanical. These costly aquatic plant communities. Two of the hydrilla management options have failed to adequately control management tools that are in the process of the growth of hydrilla.
    [Show full text]
  • Aucilla River Paddling Guide
    2«¬57B F ll o r ii d a D e s ii g n a tt e d P a d dWalluiki enengah T r aCaiippllss ¯ A u c ii ll ll a R ii v e r £19 £27 «¬259 ¤¤ Lamont «¬150 JEFFERSON MADISON A u c ii ll ll a R ii v e rr P a d d ll ii n g T rr a ii ll M a p 2«¬57A Eridu TAYLOR «¬14 Designated Paddling Trail Wetlands Water Designated Paddling Trail Index 0 1 2 4 Miles A u c ii ll ll a R ii v e rr P a d d ll ii n g T rr a ii ll M a p ¯ Wal ker Sp ringsT ho - mas C ity Rd Lan i er Rd # 1: Herndon Landing !| N30.31754 W-83.81561 JEFFERSON MADISON l a c n O TAYLOR 7 5 2 R C # 3: Old Railroad Bridge !y N30.2799 W-83.8422 !| # 2 Reams Landing N30.172751 W-83.504424 d a e e r il v e G i v RR i t ll aa M iill #4, Jones Mill Creek cc N30.254567 W-83.897367 uu AA d a o R m ra T l Middle Aucilla !| a e Conservation Area n O O n e a l S Scout Rapids id e N30.2458 W-83.9143 4 1 R C e in L r r e e w v i o P R a l l i c u A Tower CR 680 !| #5, End of Trail, N30.2105 W-83.9218 Go ose P asture Aucilla Wildlife Co un Management Area ty R oa d 65 k 5 c rd o o F m y k m c Florida National Scenic Trail a o H R l l e w o Aucilla River Designated Paddling Trail P !| Canoe/Kayak Launch Conservation Lands 0 0.75 1.5 3 Miles Wetlands Aucilla River Paddling Trail Guide The Waterway With high limestone banks and an arching canopy of live oaks, cypress and other trees, the Aucilla River is as picturesque as it is wild.
    [Show full text]