REPRESENTATIONS of the SYMMETRIC GROUP and POLYNOMIAL IDENTITIES These Are the Lecture Notes from a Short Course Given by the Au

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

REPRESENTATIONS of the SYMMETRIC GROUP and POLYNOMIAL IDENTITIES These Are the Lecture Notes from a Short Course Given by the Au REPRESENTATIONS OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUP AND POLYNOMIAL IDENTITIES LUIZ A. PERESI These are the lecture notes from a short course given by the author during the CIMPA Research School on Associative and Nonassociative Algebras and Dialge- bras: Theory and Algorithms - In Honour of Jean-Louis Loday (1946-2012), held at CIMAT, Guanajuato, Mexico, February 17 to March 2, 2013. Abstract. Let Sn denote the symmetric group on n symbols. When F has characteristic zero or greater than n, the group algebra FSn is a direct sum of p(n) matrix algebras over F, where p(n) is the number of partitions of n. We present an efficient method due to J. M. Clifton (1981) that calculates the matrix associated to each element of Sn, for each partition of n. In 1950, A. I. Malcev and W. Specht independently used the representation theory of the symmetric group to classify polynomial identities of algebraic structures. Starting in the 1970's the method was further developed by A. Regev (see the survey paper Regev [50]). The method was implemented as a computer algebra system by I. R. Hentzel in 1977. We present this computational method and give applications to research on identities of Cayley-Dickson algebras, nuclear elements of the free alternative algebra and special identities of Bol algebras. For some applications of the computational method to other algebraic structures see the papers [9]-[14] by M. R. Bremner and the author. 1. Representations of the symmetric group Let n be a positive integer, Sn the symmetric group on f1; : : : ; ng and FSn the group algebra over the field F. We remind that if G is a group then the group algebra FG is the vector space over F with basis G, and the multiplication in FG is given by extending the multiplication in G. The representation theory of FSn was determined in 1900 by Alfred Young (1873-1940). It has since been simplified and exposited by many authors. See for example Boerner [4] and James and Kerber [40]. We give an exposition of this theory based on Clifton [15]. In his review (MR0624907 (82j:20024)) of Clifton's paper, James wrote the following: \Most methods for working out the matrices for the natural representation are messy, but this paper gives an approach which is simple both to prove and to apply." 1.1. Frames and tableaus. A partition of n is an ordered sequence of positive integers λ = λ1 : : : λk satisfying λ1 ≥ λ2 ≥ · · · ≥ λk and λ1+···+λk = n. The frame corresponding to λ consists of n boxes in k left-justified rows of lengths λ1; : : : ; λk. For example, if n = 3 then there are 3 partitions 3; 21; 111 with corresponding frames 1 2 LUIZ A. PERESI A tableau corresponding to λ consists of a bijective assignment of the numbers 1; : : : ; n to the n boxes. A standard tableau is one in which the assigned numbers increase in each row from left to right and in each column from top to bottom. For example, if n = 3 then the standard tableaus are: 1 1 2 1 3 1 2 3 2 3 2 3 The number of standard tableaus corresponding to partition λ = λ1 : : : λk of n is given by Y n! (li − lj) i<j where li = λi + k − i (i = 1; : : : ; k): l1! l2! : : : lk! If T is a tableau we denote by T (i; j) the number in row i and column j. The lexicographical order on tableaus is defined by T < T 0 if and only if T (i; j) < T 0(i; j) where i is the least row index for which T (i; j) 6= T 0(i; j). For finite groups we have: Theorem 1.1. (H. Maschke 1899) For any finite group G and any field F, of characteristic 0 or characteristic p not dividing jGj, the group algebra FG is semisimple. It follows that FG is isomorphic to the direct sum of simple ideals, and each simple ideal is isomorphic to the endomorphism algebra of a vector space over a division ring over F. For G = Sn, these division rings are all equal to F and we have: Corollary 1.2. The Wedderburn decomposition of FSn is given by an iso- morphism M φ: F Sn ! Mdλ (F); λ where the summation is over all partitions λ of n, and dλ is the corresponding number of standard tableaus. A permutation π of f1; 2; : : : ; ng is denoted by the sequence π(1)π(2) : : : π(n). For n = 3 we have the isomorphism φ: FS3 ! F ⊕ M2(F) ⊕ F: given by 1 0 0 1 φ(123) = 1; ; 1 ; φ(132) = 1; ; −1 ; 0 1 1 0 1 −1 −1 1 φ(213) = 1; ; −1 ; φ(231) = 1; ; 1 ; 0 −1 −1 0 0 −1 −1 0 φ(312) = 1; ; 1 ; φ(321) = 1; ; −1 : 1 −1 −1 1 REPRESENTATIONS AND IDENTITIES 3 1.2. Computing the irreducible representations. Let λ be a partition of n. Let T1;:::; Tdλ be the standard tableaus for λ in lexicographical order. For π 2 Sn λ we denote by Rπ the dλ ×dλ matrix representing π, that is, the projection of π onto the summand Mdλ (F) in the Wedderburn decomposition given by Corollary 1.2.The λ λ λ map R : Sn ! Mdλ (F) defined by R (π) = Rπ is the irreducible representation of Sn corresponding to the partition λ. Let ι denote the identity permutation in Sn. The matrix Rλ(π) is given by λ λ −1 λ Rπ = (Aι ) Aπ; λ λ where Aι and Aπ are the Clifton matrices corresponding to ι and π. λ The Clifton matrix Aπ is the dλ × dλ matrix defined by the following algorithm λ for computing each entry (Aπ)ij: • Apply π to the standard tableau Tj obtaining the (possibly non-standard) tableau πTj. • If there exist two numbers that appear together both in a column of Ti and λ in a row of πTj, then (Aπ)ij = 0. • Otherwise, there exists a vertical permutation κ 2 Sn which { leaves the columns of Ti fixed as sets, { and takes the numbers of Ti into the rows they occupy in πTj. λ In this case, (Aπ)ij = (κ), the sign of κ. λ For n ≤ 4 and for all partitions λ, Aι is the identity matrix. For n ≥ 5 and for λ some partitions λ, the matrix Aι is not the identity matrix; however this matrix is always invertible. Example 1.3. Let n = 3 and λ = 21. We have that dλ = 2. For π = 213 we calculate Aπ. (i; j) Ti π(Tj) 1 2 2 1 (1; 1) T = πT = κ = ι (κ) = 1 1 3 1 3 1 2 2 3 (1; 2) T = πT = κ = 321 (κ) = −1 1 3 2 1 1 3 2 1 (2; 1) T = πT = κ does not exist 2 2 1 3 1 3 2 3 (2; 2) T = πT = κ = 213 (κ) = −1 2 2 2 1 1 −1 This gives the Clifton matrix Aλ = : π 0 −1 Example 1.4. Let n = 5 and λ = 32. In this case dλ = 5 and the standard tableaus are 1 2 3 1 2 4 1 2 5 1 3 4 1 3 5 4 5 3 5 3 4 2 5 2 4 4 LUIZ A. PERESI λ To calculate the (1; 5) entry of the Clifton matrix Aι , we consider T1 and ιT5 = T5. In this case the transposition κ = 15342 interchanging 2 and 5 is the required λ vertical permutation, so (Aι )15 = −1. In fact, we have 2 1 0 0 0 −1 3 2 1 0 0 0 1 3 6 0 1 0 0 0 7 6 0 1 0 0 0 7 λ 6 7 λ −1 6 7 A = 6 0 0 1 0 0 7 ; (A ) = 6 0 0 1 0 0 7 : ι 6 7 ι 6 7 4 0 0 0 1 0 5 4 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 λ This is the simplest case in which Aι is not the identity matrix. λ To illustrate the difference that can exist between the Clifton matrix Aπ and the λ λ −1 λ representation matrix Rπ = (Aι ) Aπ, consider the 5-cycle π = 23451; in this case we calculate λ λ −1 λ Rπ (Aι ) Aπ 2 −1 −1 1 1 0 3 2 1 0 0 0 1 3 2 −1 0 1 0 0 3 6 −1 0 0 0 1 7 6 0 1 0 0 0 7 6 −1 0 0 0 1 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 0 −1 0 0 0 7 = 6 0 0 1 0 0 7 6 0 −1 0 0 0 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 4 −1 0 0 1 0 5 4 0 0 0 1 0 5 4 −1 0 0 1 0 5 0 −1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 −1 0 1 0 L The Wedderburn decomposition φ: F Sn ! λ Mdλ (F) has an inverse −1 M φ : Mdλ (F) ! F Sn λ −1 λ λ λ given by φ (Eij) = Uij, where λ is a partition of n and Eij is the dλ × dλ matrix λ unit. We describe how the elements Uij 2 FSn can be calculate. λ λ Let Ti be the i-th standard tableau in lexicographical order. We denote by Ri λ the subgroup of Sn which permutes the elements of Ti within each row but leaves λ the rows fixed as sets.
Recommended publications
  • On Some Generation Methods of Finite Simple Groups
    Introduction Preliminaries Special Kind of Generation of Finite Simple Groups The Bibliography On Some Generation Methods of Finite Simple Groups Ayoub B. M. Basheer Department of Mathematical Sciences, North-West University (Mafikeng), P Bag X2046, Mmabatho 2735, South Africa Groups St Andrews 2017 in Birmingham, School of Mathematics, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom 11th of August 2017 Ayoub Basheer, North-West University, South Africa Groups St Andrews 2017 Talk in Birmingham Introduction Preliminaries Special Kind of Generation of Finite Simple Groups The Bibliography Abstract In this talk we consider some methods of generating finite simple groups with the focus on ranks of classes, (p; q; r)-generation and spread (exact) of finite simple groups. We show some examples of results that were established by the author and his supervisor, Professor J. Moori on generations of some finite simple groups. Ayoub Basheer, North-West University, South Africa Groups St Andrews 2017 Talk in Birmingham Introduction Preliminaries Special Kind of Generation of Finite Simple Groups The Bibliography Introduction Generation of finite groups by suitable subsets is of great interest and has many applications to groups and their representations. For example, Di Martino and et al. [39] established a useful connection between generation of groups by conjugate elements and the existence of elements representable by almost cyclic matrices. Their motivation was to study irreducible projective representations of the sporadic simple groups. In view of applications, it is often important to exhibit generating pairs of some special kind, such as generators carrying a geometric meaning, generators of some prescribed order, generators that offer an economical presentation of the group.
    [Show full text]
  • Representation Theory with a Perspective from Category Theory
    Representation Theory with a Perspective from Category Theory Joshua Wong Mentor: Saad Slaoui 1 Contents 1 Introduction3 2 Representations of Finite Groups4 2.1 Basic Definitions.................................4 2.2 Character Theory.................................7 3 Frobenius Reciprocity8 4 A View from Category Theory 10 4.1 A Note on Tensor Products........................... 10 4.2 Adjunction.................................... 10 4.3 Restriction and extension of scalars....................... 12 5 Acknowledgements 14 2 1 Introduction Oftentimes, it is better to understand an algebraic structure by representing its elements as maps on another space. For example, Cayley's Theorem tells us that every finite group is isomorphic to a subgroup of some symmetric group. In particular, representing groups as linear maps on some vector space allows us to translate group theory problems to linear algebra problems. In this paper, we will go over some introductory representation theory, which will allow us to reach an interesting result known as Frobenius Reciprocity. Afterwards, we will examine Frobenius Reciprocity from the perspective of category theory. 3 2 Representations of Finite Groups 2.1 Basic Definitions Definition 2.1.1 (Representation). A representation of a group G on a finite-dimensional vector space is a homomorphism φ : G ! GL(V ) where GL(V ) is the group of invertible linear endomorphisms on V . The degree of the representation is defined to be the dimension of the underlying vector space. Note that some people refer to V as the representation of G if it is clear what the underlying homomorphism is. Furthermore, if it is clear what the representation is from context, we will use g instead of φ(g).
    [Show full text]
  • 14.2 Covers of Symmetric and Alternating Groups
    Remark 206 In terms of Galois cohomology, there an exact sequence of alge- braic groups (over an algebrically closed field) 1 → GL1 → ΓV → OV → 1 We do not necessarily get an exact sequence when taking values in some subfield. If 1 → A → B → C → 1 is exact, 1 → A(K) → B(K) → C(K) is exact, but the map on the right need not be surjective. Instead what we get is 1 → H0(Gal(K¯ /K), A) → H0(Gal(K¯ /K), B) → H0(Gal(K¯ /K), C) → → H1(Gal(K¯ /K), A) → ··· 1 1 It turns out that H (Gal(K¯ /K), GL1) = 1. However, H (Gal(K¯ /K), ±1) = K×/(K×)2. So from 1 → GL1 → ΓV → OV → 1 we get × 1 1 → K → ΓV (K) → OV (K) → 1 = H (Gal(K¯ /K), GL1) However, taking 1 → µ2 → SpinV → SOV → 1 we get N × × 2 1 ¯ 1 → ±1 → SpinV (K) → SOV (K) −→ K /(K ) = H (K/K, µ2) so the non-surjectivity of N is some kind of higher Galois cohomology. Warning 207 SpinV → SOV is onto as a map of ALGEBRAIC GROUPS, but SpinV (K) → SOV (K) need NOT be onto. Example 208 Take O3(R) =∼ SO3(R)×{±1} as 3 is odd (in general O2n+1(R) =∼ SO2n+1(R) × {±1}). So we have a sequence 1 → ±1 → Spin3(R) → SO3(R) → 1. 0 × Notice that Spin3(R) ⊆ C3 (R) =∼ H, so Spin3(R) ⊆ H , and in fact we saw that it is S3. 14.2 Covers of symmetric and alternating groups The symmetric group on n letter can be embedded in the obvious way in On(R) as permutations of coordinates.
    [Show full text]
  • Representations of the Infinite Symmetric Group
    Representations of the infinite symmetric group Alexei Borodin1 Grigori Olshanski2 Version of February 26, 2016 1 Department of Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA Institute for Information Transmission Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia 2 Institute for Information Transmission Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia Contents 0 Introduction 4 I Symmetric functions and Thoma's theorem 12 1 Symmetric group representations 12 Exercises . 19 2 Theory of symmetric functions 20 Exercises . 31 3 Coherent systems on the Young graph 37 The infinite symmetric group and the Young graph . 37 Coherent systems . 39 The Thoma simplex . 41 1 CONTENTS 2 Integral representation of coherent systems and characters . 44 Exercises . 46 4 Extreme characters and Thoma's theorem 47 Thoma's theorem . 47 Multiplicativity . 49 Exercises . 52 5 Pascal graph and de Finetti's theorem 55 Exercises . 60 6 Relative dimension in Y 61 Relative dimension and shifted Schur polynomials . 61 The algebra of shifted symmetric functions . 65 Modified Frobenius coordinates . 66 The embedding Yn ! Ω and asymptotic bounds . 68 Integral representation of coherent systems: proof . 71 The Vershik{Kerov theorem . 74 Exercises . 76 7 Boundaries and Gibbs measures on paths 82 The category B ............................. 82 Projective chains . 83 Graded graphs . 86 Gibbs measures . 88 Examples of path spaces for branching graphs . 91 The Martin boundary and Vershik{Kerov's ergodic theorem . 92 Exercises . 94 II Unitary representations 98 8 Preliminaries and Gelfand pairs 98 Exercises . 108 9 Spherical type representations 111 10 Realization of spherical representations 118 Exercises .
    [Show full text]
  • Representing Groups on Graphs
    Representing groups on graphs Sagarmoy Dutta and Piyush P Kurur Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India 208016 {sagarmoy,ppk}@cse.iitk.ac.in Abstract In this paper we formulate and study the problem of representing groups on graphs. We show that with respect to polynomial time turing reducibility, both abelian and solvable group representability are all equivalent to graph isomorphism, even when the group is presented as a permutation group via generators. On the other hand, the representability problem for general groups on trees is equivalent to checking, given a group G and n, whether a nontrivial homomorphism from G to Sn exists. There does not seem to be a polynomial time algorithm for this problem, in spite of the fact that tree isomorphism has polynomial time algorithm. 1 Introduction Representation theory of groups is a vast and successful branch of mathematics with applica- tions ranging from fundamental physics to computer graphics and coding theory [5]. Recently representation theory has seen quite a few applications in computer science as well. In this article, we study some of the questions related to representation of finite groups on graphs. A representation of a group G usually means a linear representation, i.e. a homomorphism from the group G to the group GL (V ) of invertible linear transformations on a vector space V . Notice that GL (V ) is the set of symmetries or automorphisms of the vector space V . In general, by a representation of G on an object X, we mean a homomorphism from G to the automorphism group of X.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 Permutation Groups
    Arkansas Tech University MATH 4033: Elementary Modern Algebra Dr. Marcel B. Finan 6 Permutation Groups Let S be a nonempty set and M(S) be the collection of all mappings from S into S. In this section, we will emphasize on the collection of all invertible mappings from S into S. The elements of this set will be called permutations because of Theorem 2.4 and the next definition. Definition 6.1 Let S be a nonempty set. A one-to-one mapping from S onto S is called a permutation. Consider the collection of all permutations on S. Then this set is a group with respect to composition. Theorem 6.1 The set of all permutations of a nonempty set S is a group with respect to composition. This group is called the symmetric group on S and will be denoted by Sym(S). Proof. By Theorem 2.4, the set of all permutations on S is just the set I(S) of all invertible mappings from S to S. According to Theorem 4.3, this set is a group with respect to composition. Definition 6.2 A group of permutations , with composition as the operation, is called a permutation group on S. Example 6.1 1. Sym(S) is a permutation group. 2. The collection L of all invertible linear functions from R to R is a permu- tation group with respect to composition.(See Example 4.4.) Note that L is 1 a proper subset of Sym(R) since we can find a function in Sym(R) which is not in L, namely, the function f(x) = x3.
    [Show full text]
  • A B S T R a C T. World Spinors, the Spinorial Matter (Particles, P-Branes and Fields) in a Generic Curved Space Is Considered. R
    Bulletin T.CXLI de l'Acad´emieserbe des sciences et des arts − 2010 Classe des Sciences math´ematiqueset naturelles Sciences math´ematiques, No 35 SPINORIAL MATTER AND GENERAL RELATIVITY THEORY DJ. SIJAˇ CKIˇ (Inaugural lecture delivered on the 24th of May 2010 at the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts in Belgrade) A b s t r a c t. World spinors, the spinorial matter (particles, p-branes and fields) in a generic curved space is considered. Representation theory, as well as the basic algebraic and topological properties of relevant symme- try groups are presented. Relations between spinorial wave equations that transform respectively w.r.t. the tangent flat-space (anholonomic) Affine symmetry group and the world generic-curved-space (holonomic) group of Diffeomorphisms are presented. World spinor equations and certain basic constraints that yield a viable physical theory are discussed. A geometric con- struction based on an infinite-component generalization of the frame fields (e.g. tetrads) is outlined. The world spinor field equation in 3D is treated in more details. AMS Mathematics Subject Classification (2000): 22E46, 22E65, 58B25, 81T20, 83D05 Key Words: General relativity, world spinors, Dirac-like equation, SL(n; R) representations 98 Dj. Sijaˇckiˇ 1. Introduction Point-like matter. The Dirac equation turned out to be one of the most successful equations of the XX century physics - it describes the basic matter constituents (both particles and fields), and very significantly, it paved a way to develop the concept of gauge theories thus playing an important role in description of the basic interactions (forces) as well. It is a Poincar´ecovariant linear field 1 equation which describes relativistic spin 2 matter objects, that a coupled to fundamental interactions in Nature through the gauge (minimal coupling) prescription.
    [Show full text]
  • GROUP REPRESENTATIONS and CHARACTER THEORY Contents 1
    GROUP REPRESENTATIONS AND CHARACTER THEORY DAVID KANG Abstract. In this paper, we provide an introduction to the representation theory of finite groups. We begin by defining representations, G-linear maps, and other essential concepts before moving quickly towards initial results on irreducibility and Schur's Lemma. We then consider characters, class func- tions, and show that the character of a representation uniquely determines it up to isomorphism. Orthogonality relations are introduced shortly afterwards. Finally, we construct the character tables for a few familiar groups. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Preliminaries 1 3. Group Representations 2 4. Maschke's Theorem and Complete Reducibility 4 5. Schur's Lemma and Decomposition 5 6. Character Theory 7 7. Character Tables for S4 and Z3 12 Acknowledgments 13 References 14 1. Introduction The primary motivation for the study of group representations is to simplify the study of groups. Representation theory offers a powerful approach to the study of groups because it reduces many group theoretic problems to basic linear algebra calculations. To this end, we assume that the reader is already quite familiar with linear algebra and has had some exposure to group theory. With this said, we begin with a preliminary section on group theory. 2. Preliminaries Definition 2.1. A group is a set G with a binary operation satisfying (1) 8 g; h; i 2 G; (gh)i = g(hi)(associativity) (2) 9 1 2 G such that 1g = g1 = g; 8g 2 G (identity) (3) 8 g 2 G; 9 g−1 such that gg−1 = g−1g = 1 (inverses) Definition 2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Quasi P Or Not Quasi P? That Is the Question
    Rose-Hulman Undergraduate Mathematics Journal Volume 3 Issue 2 Article 2 Quasi p or not Quasi p? That is the Question Ben Harwood Northern Kentucky University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.rose-hulman.edu/rhumj Recommended Citation Harwood, Ben (2002) "Quasi p or not Quasi p? That is the Question," Rose-Hulman Undergraduate Mathematics Journal: Vol. 3 : Iss. 2 , Article 2. Available at: https://scholar.rose-hulman.edu/rhumj/vol3/iss2/2 Quasi p- or not quasi p-? That is the Question.* By Ben Harwood Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Northern Kentucky University Highland Heights, KY 41099 e-mail: [email protected] Section Zero: Introduction The question might not be as profound as Shakespeare’s, but nevertheless, it is interesting. Because few people seem to be aware of quasi p-groups, we will begin with a bit of history and a definition; and then we will determine for each group of order less than 24 (and a few others) whether the group is a quasi p-group for some prime p or not. This paper is a prequel to [Hwd]. In [Hwd] we prove that (Z3 £Z3)oZ2 and Z5 o Z4 are quasi 2-groups. Those proofs now form a portion of Proposition (12.1) It should also be noted that [Hwd] may also be found in this journal. Section One: Why should we be interested in quasi p-groups? In a 1957 paper titled Coverings of algebraic curves [Abh2], Abhyankar conjectured that the algebraic fundamental group of the affine line over an algebraically closed field k of prime characteristic p is the set of quasi p-groups, where by the algebraic fundamental group of the affine line he meant the family of all Galois groups Gal(L=k(X)) as L varies over all finite normal extensions of k(X) the function field of the affine line such that no point of the line is ramified in L, and where by a quasi p-group he meant a finite group that is generated by all of its p-Sylow subgroups.
    [Show full text]
  • Spinors for Everyone Gerrit Coddens
    Spinors for everyone Gerrit Coddens To cite this version: Gerrit Coddens. Spinors for everyone. 2017. cea-01572342 HAL Id: cea-01572342 https://hal-cea.archives-ouvertes.fr/cea-01572342 Submitted on 7 Aug 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Spinors for everyone Gerrit Coddens Laboratoire des Solides Irradi´es, CEA-DSM-IRAMIS, CNRS UMR 7642, Ecole Polytechnique, 28, Route de Saclay, F-91128-Palaiseau CEDEX, France 5th August 2017 Abstract. It is hard to find intuition for spinors in the literature. We provide this intuition by explaining all the underlying ideas in a way that can be understood by everybody who knows the definition of a group, complex numbers and matrix algebra. We first work out these ideas for the representation SU(2) 3 of the three-dimensional rotation group in R . In a second stage we generalize the approach to rotation n groups in vector spaces R of arbitrary dimension n > 3, endowed with an Euclidean metric. The reader can obtain this way an intuitive understanding of what a spinor is. We discuss the meaning of making linear combinations of spinors.
    [Show full text]
  • Representation Theory
    M392C NOTES: REPRESENTATION THEORY ARUN DEBRAY MAY 14, 2017 These notes were taken in UT Austin's M392C (Representation Theory) class in Spring 2017, taught by Sam Gunningham. I live-TEXed them using vim, so there may be typos; please send questions, comments, complaints, and corrections to [email protected]. Thanks to Kartik Chitturi, Adrian Clough, Tom Gannon, Nathan Guermond, Sam Gunningham, Jay Hathaway, and Surya Raghavendran for correcting a few errors. Contents 1. Lie groups and smooth actions: 1/18/172 2. Representation theory of compact groups: 1/20/174 3. Operations on representations: 1/23/176 4. Complete reducibility: 1/25/178 5. Some examples: 1/27/17 10 6. Matrix coefficients and characters: 1/30/17 12 7. The Peter-Weyl theorem: 2/1/17 13 8. Character tables: 2/3/17 15 9. The character theory of SU(2): 2/6/17 17 10. Representation theory of Lie groups: 2/8/17 19 11. Lie algebras: 2/10/17 20 12. The adjoint representations: 2/13/17 22 13. Representations of Lie algebras: 2/15/17 24 14. The representation theory of sl2(C): 2/17/17 25 15. Solvable and nilpotent Lie algebras: 2/20/17 27 16. Semisimple Lie algebras: 2/22/17 29 17. Invariant bilinear forms on Lie algebras: 2/24/17 31 18. Classical Lie groups and Lie algebras: 2/27/17 32 19. Roots and root spaces: 3/1/17 34 20. Properties of roots: 3/3/17 36 21. Root systems: 3/6/17 37 22. Dynkin diagrams: 3/8/17 39 23.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Representations of Finite Groups
    NOTES ON REPRESENTATIONS OF FINITE GROUPS AARON LANDESMAN CONTENTS 1. Introduction 3 1.1. Acknowledgements 3 1.2. A first definition 3 1.3. Examples 4 1.4. Characters 7 1.5. Character Tables and strange coincidences 8 2. Basic Properties of Representations 11 2.1. Irreducible representations 12 2.2. Direct sums 14 3. Desiderata and problems 16 3.1. Desiderata 16 3.2. Applications 17 3.3. Dihedral Groups 17 3.4. The Quaternion group 18 3.5. Representations of A4 18 3.6. Representations of S4 19 3.7. Representations of A5 19 3.8. Groups of order p3 20 3.9. Further Challenge exercises 22 4. Complete Reducibility of Complex Representations 24 5. Schur’s Lemma 30 6. Isotypic Decomposition 32 6.1. Proving uniqueness of isotypic decomposition 32 7. Homs and duals and tensors, Oh My! 35 7.1. Homs of representations 35 7.2. Duals of representations 35 7.3. Tensors of representations 36 7.4. Relations among dual, tensor, and hom 38 8. Orthogonality of Characters 41 8.1. Reducing Theorem 8.1 to Proposition 8.6 41 8.2. Projection operators 43 1 2 AARON LANDESMAN 8.3. Proving Proposition 8.6 44 9. Orthogonality of character tables 46 10. The Sum of Squares Formula 48 10.1. The inner product on characters 48 10.2. The Regular Representation 50 11. The number of irreducible representations 52 11.1. Proving characters are independent 53 11.2. Proving characters form a basis for class functions 54 12. Dimensions of Irreps divide the order of the Group 57 Appendix A.
    [Show full text]