DOCSLIB.ORG

Crow MR&I Draft EA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Crow MR&I Draft EA Municipal, Rural, and Industrial Water System Crow Reservation, Montana Draft Environmental Assessment June 2016 This page intentionally left blank. Mission Statements The Department of the Interior protects and manages the Nation’s natural resources and cultural heritage; provides scientific and other information about those resources; and honors its trust responsibilities or special commitments to American Indians, Alaska Natives, and affiliated island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. The mission of the Bureau of Indian Affairs is to enhance the quality of life, to promote economic opportunity, and to carry out the responsibility to protect and improve the trust assets of American Indians, Indian tribes, and Alaska Natives. This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents 1.0 PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR ACTION .................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Authority .......................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Purpose of the Proposed Action ...................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Need for the Proposed Action ......................................................................................... 1-2 1.5 Benefits and Opportunities .............................................................................................. 1-3 1.6 Nature of Decision to be Made ........................................................................................ 1-4 1.7 Issues to be Evaluated ..................................................................................................... 1-4 1.8 Jurisdiction and Permits ................................................................................................... 1-5 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES ..................................................... 2-1 2.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Alternatives Development and Screening ....................................................................... 2-1 2.2.1 Needs Assessment and Engineering Report .................................................... 2-1 2.2.2 Master Plan Screening Summary ..................................................................... 2-3 2.2.3 Water Treatment Process Alternatives Screening Summary ........................... 2-5 2.2.4 Conclusion ........................................................................................................ 2-6 2.3 No Action Alternative ...................................................................................................... 2-6 2.4 Proposed Action Alternative ............................................................................................ 2-7 2.4.1 Project Components ......................................................................................... 2-7 2.4.2 Operations, Maintenance, & Replacement.................................................... 2-18 2.4.3 Community Upgrades .................................................................................... 2-20 2.4.4 Project Construction ...................................................................................... 2-21 2.4.5 Environmental Commitments ........................................................................ 2-22 2.5 Comparison of Effects of Alternatives ........................................................................... 2-29 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ....................................... 3-1 3.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Socioeconomics & Environmental Justice ....................................................................... 3-2 3.2.1 Social and Economic Regulations ..................................................................... 3-2 3.2.2 Population and Projected Growth of the Reservation and Service Area ......... 3-2 3.2.3 Reservation Employment, Education, Economy and Businesses ..................... 3-3 3.2.4 Minority and Low-Income Populations / Household Economy ....................... 3-5 3.2.5 Direct, Indirect, and Cumulative Effects .......................................................... 3-6 3.3 Public Health & Safety ................................................................................................... 3-10 3.3.1 Public Health Regulations .............................................................................. 3-10 3.3.2 Existing Drinking Water Quality ..................................................................... 3-12 3.3.3 Existing Water Supply Infrastructure and Fire Safety .................................... 3-13 3.3.4 Existing Hazardous Waste and Pollution ........................................................ 3-13 3.3.5 Existing Infrastructure and Utilities ................................................................ 3-14 3.3.6 Direct, Indirect, and Cumulative Effects ........................................................ 3-14 3.4 Water Resources ............................................................................................................ 3-16 i 3.4.1 Water Regulations and Water Quality Standards .......................................... 3-16 3.4.2 Existing Water Resources and Water Rights .................................................. 3-17 3.4.3 Existing Surface Water Quality ....................................................................... 3-20 3.4.4 Direct, Indirect, and Cumulative Effects ........................................................ 3-20 3.5 Fisheries & Aquatic Life .................................................................................................. 3-25 3.5.1 Fisheries & Aquatic Species Regulations and Instream Flow Requirements . 3-25 3.5.2 Existing Conditions ......................................................................................... 3-26 3.5.3 Direct, Indirect, and Cumulative Effects ........................................................ 3-28 3.6 Geology & Soils .............................................................................................................. 3-32 3.6.1 Soil Regulations .............................................................................................. 3-32 3.6.2 Existing Conditions ......................................................................................... 3-32 3.6.3 Direct, Indirect, and Cumulative Effects ........................................................ 3-34 3.7 Vegetation & Land Use .................................................................................................. 3-36 3.7.1 Vegetation Regulations .................................................................................. 3-37 3.7.2 Existing Conditions ......................................................................................... 3-37 3.7.3 Direct, Indirect, and Cumulative Effects ........................................................ 3-42 3.8 Cultural & Trust Resources ............................................................................................ 3-44 3.8.1 Cultural and Trust Regulations ....................................................................... 3-45 3.8.2 Existing Conditions ......................................................................................... 3-45 3.8.3 Direct, Indirect, and Cumulative Effects ........................................................ 3-47 3.9 Wetlands & Floodplains ................................................................................................. 3-48 3.9.1 Wetland and Floodplain Regulations ............................................................. 3-48 3.9.2 Existing Conditions ......................................................................................... 3-49 3.9.3 Direct, Indirect, and Cumulative Effects ........................................................ 3-50 3.10 Wildlife ........................................................................................................................... 3-51 3.10.1 Wildlife Laws and Regulations ....................................................................... 3-52 3.10.2 Existing Wildlife and Habitat .......................................................................... 3-52 3.10.3 Direct, Indirect, and Cumulative Effects ........................................................ 3-56 3.11 Aesthetic/Visual Resources............................................................................................ 3-58 3.11.1 Existing Visual Resources and Scenic Quality ................................................. 3-59 3.11.2 Direct, Indirect, and Cumulative Effects ........................................................ 3-59 3.12 Air Quality, Noise & Traffic ............................................................................................ 3-62 3.12.1 Air Quality, Noise, and Traffic Regulations .................................................... 3-62 3.12.2 Existing Conditions ........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Teacher’S Guide Teacher’S Guide Little Bighorn National Monument
    LITTLE BIGHORN NATIONAL MONUMENT TEACHER’S GUIDE TEACHER’S GUIDE LITTLE BIGHORN NATIONAL MONUMENT INTRODUCTION The purpose of this Teacher’s Guide is to provide teachers grades K-12 information and activities concerning Plains Indian Life-ways, the events surrounding the Battle of the Little Bighorn, the Personalities involved and the Impact of the Battle. The information provided can be modified to fit most ages. Unit One: PERSONALITIES Unit Two: PLAINS INDIAN LIFE-WAYS Unit Three: CLASH OF CULTURES Unit Four: THE CAMPAIGN OF 1876 Unit Five: BATTLE OF THE LITTLE BIGHORN Unit Six: IMPACT OF THE BATTLE In 1879 the land where The Battle of the Little Bighorn occurred was designated Custer Battlefield National Cemetery in order to protect the bodies of the men buried on the field of battle. With this designation, the land fell under the control of the United States War Department. It would remain under their control until 1940, when the land was turned over to the National Park Service. Custer Battlefield National Monument was established by Congress in 1946. The name was changed to Little Bighorn National Monument in 1991. This area was once the homeland of the Crow Indians who by the 1870s had been displaced by the Lakota and Cheyenne. The park consists of 765 acres on the east boundary of the Little Bighorn River: the larger north- ern section is known as Custer Battlefield, the smaller Reno-Benteen Battlefield is located on the bluffs over-looking the river five miles to the south. The park lies within the Crow Indian Reservation in southeastern Montana, one mile east of I-90.
    [Show full text]
  • 155891 WPO 43.2 Inside WSUP C.Indd
    MAY 2017 VOL 43 NO 2 LEWIS AND CLARK TRAIL HERITAGE FOUNDATION • Black Sands and White Earth • Baleen, Blubber & Train Oil from Sacagawea’s “monstrous fish” • Reviews, News, and more the Rocky Mountain Fur Trade Journal VOLUME 11 - 2017 The Henry & Ashley Fur Company Keelboat Enterprize by Clay J. Landry and Jim Hardee Navigation of the dangerous and unpredictable Missouri River claimed many lives and thousands of dollars in trade goods in the early 1800s, including the HAC’s Enterprize. Two well-known fur trade historians detail the keelboat’s misfortune, Ashley’s resourceful response, and a possible location of the wreck. More than Just a Rock: the Manufacture of Gunflints by Michael P. Schaubs For centuries, trappers and traders relied on dependable gunflints for defense, hunting, and commerce. This article describes the qualities of a superior gunflint and chronicles the evolution of a stone-age craft into an important industry. The Hudson’s Bay Company and the “Youtah” Country, 1825-41 by Dale Topham The vast reach of the Hudson’s Bay Company extended to the Ute Indian territory in the latter years of the Rocky Mountain rendezvous period, as pressure increased from The award-winning, peer-reviewed American trappers crossing the Continental Divide. Journal continues to bring fresh Traps: the Common Denominator perspectives by encouraging by James A. Hanson, PhD. research and debate about the The portable steel trap, an exponential improvement over snares, spears, nets, and earlier steel traps, revolutionized Rocky Mountain fur trade era. trapping in North America. Eminent scholar James A. Hanson tracks the evolution of the technology and its $25 each plus postage deployment by Euro-Americans and Indians.
    [Show full text]
  • Level I History.Indd
    Crow Tipi Village A. Wolf Activity 2 History - The Power of a Story Trails Through the Years By Christy Fleming The Bad Pass Trail, marked by rock cairns, was still not an easy trip. It was a well known weaves its way along the rugged western edge fact by those that drove along the trail, that they of Bighorn Canyon, from the mouth of the Sho- should always carry a tire repair kit with them as shone River to the mouth of Grapevine Creek. they were almost guaranteed at least one fl at tire One may guess from its name that the Bad Pass along the way. trail was not an easy trail. It was better than the alternatives of crossing the mountains or the Today the park road follows closely the original dangers of possibly drowning in the untamed path of the Bad Pass, some times following over waters of the Bighorn River coursing through the the top of it. If this trail could talk it would have canyon. The Crow told stories of evil spirits that years of stories to share. The stories of adventure resided in the canyon, serving as an additional have now turned to stories of wildlife viewing deterrent to river travel. and recreation. As the years go by more stories will be added and others will study them. Who Native people walked and camped along this knows, maybe someday in the future, students trail for 10,000 to 12,000 years while traveling will be studying our impact on the Bad Pass Trail. to the buff alo plains.
    [Show full text]
  • Medicinal Plants and EAV
    Medicinal plants and EAV Directed phytotherapy These listed medicinal plants facilitate a safe start with the combination EAV & phytotherapy. The symptoms should be correctly classified and treated causally by an EAV practitioner, who also knows which parts of the plants are efficient, how they have to be prepared and who knows the Indications and contraindications of each medicinal plant and can precisely apply them in the energetic context. The best phytopharmaceutical is the one which is tested according the EAV and enables 100% personalized treatments. Abies alba (1) Ge, Kr, Ne B, Lu Abies balsamea (1) Lu Abies sibirica (1) Ge, Kr, Ne B, Lu Acacia senegal, (vereck) (1) Bi D Achillea millefolium (1) Hau, Bl E, Madidü, Ne Achillea moscata (1) Madidü, Ne Acokanthera ouabaio (1) Aconitum napellus (1) Acorus calamus (1) Ne B, Ge, Mada Adiantum capillus veneris (1) Hau F Adonis vernalis (1) Aesculus hippocastanum (1) Kr A, Kr Gb He Kb, Al D, Kr Gb Kr Hb, Bl E, Ly Agrimonia eupatoria (1) Legbl, Didü, He Kb, Kr, Ge Agropyron caninum, repens (1) 3e D Ajuga reptans (1) Didü Alchemilla alpinae (1) Alchemilla glabra (1) Kr Gb, Didü, Ly D, Ly F Alchemilla vulgaris (1) Didü Alkana tinctoria (1) Allium cepa (1) Pa, Al D Allium sativum (1) Hau, Pa, Al D, Hekr, Ne G, Madidü, Le 5 = MiPa 6 = Ni 8 Allium ursinum (1) Hau Aloe barbadensis, ferox (1) Madidü Aloe vulgaris (1) Madidü Alpinia officinarum (1) Madidü Althaea officinalis (1) Lu, Ly D Ammi majus (1) Hau 1 Medicinal plants and EAV Ammi visagna (1) Al Amygdalus communis (1) Hau Anacyclus pyrethrum
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resource Assessment of the Custer National Forest in The
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mineral Resource Assessment of the Custer National Forest in the Pryor Mountains, Carbon County, South-Central Montana by Bradley S. Van Gosen1 , Anna B. Wilson1 , and Jane M. Hammarstrom2, with a section on GEOPHYSICS by Dolores M. Kulik1 Open-File Report 96-256 1996 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 1 U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado 2 U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia CONTENTS Page Abstract .................................................. 1 Introduction ................................................ 2 Geology of the Pryor Mountains ................................... 7 Regional and local structural setting ............................. 7 Stratigraphy .......................................... 11 Uranium-vanadium deposits of the Pryor Mountains ...................... 13 Mining history ......................................... 13 Geology of the host collapse structures .......................... 17 Mineral deposits and associated alteration ........................ 21 Size, grade, and distribution of the deposits ....................... 26 Origin of the deposits .................................... 26 Exploration criteria and previous reconnaissance studies ................ 29 Geophysics by Dolores M. Kulik
    [Show full text]
  • Noxious and Rangeland Weed Management: Getting the Most out of Spraying Mark Pederson Dow Agrosciences [email protected]
    Noxious and Rangeland Weed Management: Getting the Most Out of Spraying Mark Pederson Dow AgroSciences [email protected] DOW RESTRICTED - For internal use only Thanks to Pend Oreille County. DOW RESTRICTED - For internal use only Successful Herbicide Weed Control • Why does the herbicide work better one year and not the next? • What changes from year to year? • Is your equipment in good working order? • Just keeping on doing what you always have done… • And get what you always got! DOW RESTRICTED - For internal use only The Variables • Weather • Growing conditions • Temperatures • Wind • Water volume per acre applied • Equipment wear and calibration • You, you, you DOW RESTRICTED - For internal use only Start with the End in Mind • Visualize what you want to accomplish with every spray job – set expectations • Review records and see what has changed • Are the growing conditions and weeds conducive to weed control? • Recalibrate every year and even do a check up during the spray season • Calibrate every applicator that applies products DOW RESTRICTED - For internal use only Rates, Carrier & Equipment • Select herbicide product that: – controls the majority of target weeds – use the correct rates (don’t scrimp) • Water carrier per acre – use enough to get the product to the desired site of activity (if herbicide is soil active, it must penetrate the vegetative canopy to get benefit) – Use Syltac or R-11 • Tune-up sprayers and do timely repairs DOW RESTRICTED - For internal use only Adjuvants/Surfactants • Always use Syltac or R-11 • Use
    [Show full text]
  • Rosebud and Wolf Mountains Battlefields Under Siege
    ROSEBUD AND WOLF MOUNTAINS BATTLEFIELDS UNDER SIEGE A Case Study in Threats to the Spirit of Place CHERE JIUSTO Montana Preservation Alliance 120 Reeder’s Alley Helena, Montana, U.S.A. 59601 [email protected] AND LYNDA B. MOSS Foundation for Community Vitality 611 N 31st Street Billings, Montana, U.S.A. 59101 [email protected] Abstract. This paper discusses the deeply seated spirit of battlefields and places of conflict, the need to recognize various cultural perspectives at such places, and the grave threats posed to sites of high cultural value by global energy development. Using Montana’s Rosebud and Wolf Mountains Battlefields, two pristine but threatened sites, and pending United States National Historic Landmarks, as case studies, the authors will address the complex challenges and strategies for preserving such places. No sites embody a more conflicted spirit of place than battlefields, where heroic sacrifice and tragic human failures resonate across time. The spirit of conflicted places has layered meaning, reflecting different significance for people of divergent cultural perspectives. Thus, when a site represents the experience of several culture groups, seeking to preserve the spirit is a nuanced assignment. To truly preserve the spirit of such places, it is important to consult people from all sides of the story, and to seek broad understanding and definition of the values of place. And ultimately, in seeking consensus, there must also be a true willingness to save, rather than develop, the cultural landscape. 2 CHERE JIUSTO AND LYNDA B. MOSS 1. Territorial Conflict on the Northern Plains Eastern Montana falls within a geographic region known as the Northern Plains, a large grasslands environment that until the late 1800s was home to vast herds of buffalo and native equestrian cultures.
    [Show full text]
  • Battle of the Greasy Grass
    The Military Campaign of 1876 After the discovery of gold in the Black Hills following Custer’s 1875 Expedition, the US tried to buy the land from the Sioux, but they would not sell their sacred Paha Sapa. The government issued a decree requiring all non-reservation Indians to report to the agencies by Jan. 1, 1876. Because of this decree, in November of 1875, . Hunkpapa Lakota Headman and Holy Man SITTING BULL sent out a call to gather together all of the Sioux, Cheyenne, and Arapaho at the Chalk Buttes at the end of the Moon When Geese Return to discuss what to do about the incursion of whites into the land granted them in the United States treaties. Sun Dance Sitting Bull decides to hold a Sun Dance to gather the leaders to decide what to do about the white invaders and unite the people in the sacred ceremony. Sitting Bull sacrifices 100 pieces of flesh and has a vision of Long Knives Falling from the Sky. General George Crook, General Alfred Terry, and Colonel John Gibbon Led the Campaign to move all Indians to reservations, defeating those who resisted. Battle of the Rosebud Or, Battle Where the Woman Saved Her Brother On June 17, 1876, Sioux and Cheyenne forces led by Crazy Horse spotted General Crook, his 1,050 soldiers, and 260 Crow and Shoshone scouts, defeating them and eliminating them from the campaign. Three Army Expeditions General Crook would be coming from the south from Fort Fetterman in Wyoming Territory Col Gibbon would arrive from the west from Fort Ellis in Montana Territory General Terry would travel from the east from Fort Abraham Lincoln in Dakota Territory.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting the Crown: a Century of Resource Management in Glacier National Park
    Protecting the Crown A Century of Resource Management in Glacier National Park Rocky Mountains Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (RM-CESU) RM-CESU Cooperative Agreement H2380040001 (WASO) RM-CESU Task Agreement J1434080053 Theodore Catton, Principal Investigator University of Montana Department of History Missoula, Montana 59812 Diane Krahe, Researcher University of Montana Department of History Missoula, Montana 59812 Deirdre K. Shaw NPS Key Official and Curator Glacier National Park West Glacier, Montana 59936 June 2011 Table of Contents List of Maps and Photographs v Introduction: Protecting the Crown 1 Chapter 1: A Homeland and a Frontier 5 Chapter 2: A Reservoir of Nature 23 Chapter 3: A Complete Sanctuary 57 Chapter 4: A Vignette of Primitive America 103 Chapter 5: A Sustainable Ecosystem 179 Conclusion: Preserving Different Natures 245 Bibliography 249 Index 261 List of Maps and Photographs MAPS Glacier National Park 22 Threats to Glacier National Park 168 PHOTOGRAPHS Cover - hikers going to Grinnell Glacier, 1930s, HPC 001581 Introduction – Three buses on Going-to-the-Sun Road, 1937, GNPA 11829 1 1.1 Two Cultural Legacies – McDonald family, GNPA 64 5 1.2 Indian Use and Occupancy – unidentified couple by lake, GNPA 24 7 1.3 Scientific Exploration – George B. Grinnell, Web 12 1.4 New Forms of Resource Use – group with stringer of fish, GNPA 551 14 2.1 A Foundation in Law – ranger at check station, GNPA 2874 23 2.2 An Emphasis on Law Enforcement – two park employees on hotel porch, 1915 HPC 001037 25 2.3 Stocking the Park – men with dead mountain lions, GNPA 9199 31 2.4 Balancing Preservation and Use – road-building contractors, 1924, GNPA 304 40 2.5 Forest Protection – Half Moon Fire, 1929, GNPA 11818 45 2.6 Properties on Lake McDonald – cabin in Apgar, Web 54 3.1 A Background of Construction – gas shovel, GTSR, 1937, GNPA 11647 57 3.2 Wildlife Studies in the 1930s – George M.
    [Show full text]
  • Cynoglossum Officinale L
    United States Department of Agriculture NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE Invasive Species Technical Note No. MT-8 January 2007 Ecology and Management of Houndstongue (Cynoglossum officinale L.) by Jim Jacobs, NRCS Invasive Species Specialist, Bozeman, Montana Sharlene Sing, Assistant Research Professor, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana Abstract Houndstongue, Cynoglossum officinale (Boraginaceae), is a biennial or short-lived perennial originating from montane zones in western Asia and Eastern Europe. Houndstongue reproduces by seed only, and was probably introduced to North America as a grain seed contaminant. This species was first reported in Montana from Sweet Grass County near Big Timber, Montana in 1900. As of 2006, houndstongue has been reported in 35 of Montana’s 56 counties (http://invader.dbs.umt.edu). Houndstongue invades grasslands, pastures, shrublands, forestlands, croplands and riparian areas, and is an effective competitor that readily displaces desirable species, establishing monocultures and further degrading forage quality in disturbed habitats. This species is particularly well adapted to invading and dominating forest openings created through logging activities. Houndstongue has a number of biological characteristics that contribute to its invasiveness. Houndstongue seeds are covered with barbed prickles that have been referred to as ‘nature’s Velcro®. These facilitate the effective, widespread dispersal of seeds on the fur, wool or hides of passing wildlife and livestock, and on the cloths of humans. The seeds are also relatively large; this provision of stored energy confers a significant competitive advantage due to high germination rates and seedling establishment. The large taproot developed in the first year of growth enables houndstongue to tolerate environmental stress and produce many seeds in the second year of growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Plants of Northeastern Utah
    MOUNTAIN PLANTS OF NORTHEASTERN UTAH Original booklet and drawings by Berniece A. Andersen and Arthur H. Holmgren Revised May 1996 HG 506 FOREWORD In the original printing, the purpose of this manual was to serve as a guide for students, amateur botanists and anyone interested in the wildflowers of a rather limited geographic area. The intent was to depict and describe over 400 common, conspicuous or beautiful species. In this revision we have tried to maintain the intent and integrity of the original. Scientific names have been updated in accordance with changes in taxonomic thought since the time of the first printing. Some changes have been incorporated in order to make the manual more user-friendly for the beginner. The species are now organized primarily by floral color. We hope that these changes serve to enhance the enjoyment and usefulness of this long-popular manual. We would also like to thank Larry A. Rupp, Extension Horticulture Specialist, for critical review of the draft and for the cover photo. Linda Allen, Assistant Curator, Intermountain Herbarium Donna H. Falkenborg, Extension Editor Utah State University Extension is an affirmative action/equal employment opportunity employer and educational organization. We offer our programs to persons regardless of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age or disability. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Robert L. Gilliland, Vice-President and Director, Cooperative Extension
    [Show full text]
  • OUT HERE, WE HAVE a STORY to TELL. This Map Will Lead You on a Historic Journey Following the Movements of Lt
    OUT HERE, WE HAVE A STORY TO TELL. This map will lead you on a historic journey following the movements of Lt. Col. Custer and the 7th Calvary during the days, weeks and months leading up to, and immediately following, the renowned Battle of Little Bighorn were filled with skirmishes, political maneuvering and emotional intensity – for both sides. Despite their resounding victory, the Plains Indians’ way of life was drastically, immediately and forever changed. Glendive Stories of great heroism and reticent defeat continue to reverberate through MAKOSHIKA STATE PARK 253 the generations. Yet the mystique remains today. We invite you to follow the Wibaux Trail to The Little Bighorn, to stand where the warriors and the soldiers stood, 94 to feel the prairie sun on your face and to hear their stories in the wind. 34 Miles to Theodore Terry Roosevelt Fallon National Park 87 12 Melstone Ingomar 94 PIROGUE Ismay ISLAND 12 12 Plevna Harlowton 1 Miles City Baker Roundup 12 89 12 59 191 Hysham 12 4 10 2 12 14 13 11 9 3 94 Rosebud Lavina Forsyth 15 332 447 16 R MEDICINE E ER 39 IV ROCKS IV R R 5 E NE U STATE PARK Broadview 87 STO 17 G OW Custer ON L T NORTH DAKOTA YE L 94 6 59 Ekalaka CUSTER GALLATIN NF 18 7 332 R E 191 IV LAKE Colstrip R MONTANA 19 Huntley R 89 Big Timber ELMO E D Billings W 447 O 90 384 8 P CUSTER Reed Point GALLATIN Bozeman Laurel PICTOGRAPH Little Bighorn Battlefield NATIONAL 90 CAVES Hardin 20 447 FOREST Columbus National Monument Ashland Crow 212 Olive Livingston 90 Lame Deer WA Agency RRIO SOUTH DAKOTA R TRA 212 IL 313 Busby
    [Show full text]