DOCSLIB.ORG

Forum Reply Doi:10.1130/G32501Y.1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Forum Reply Doi:10.1130/G32501Y.1 Forum Reply doi:10.1130/G32501Y.1 The neglected early history of Geology: The Copernican Revolution as a major advance in understanding the Earth Walter Alvarez1 and Henrique Leitão2 clearly makes this point: “I do not mean to deny the fact that there is an- 1Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, other aspect of geological research that emphasizes laws and processes Berkeley, California 94720-4767, USA, and Osservatorio Geologico di (i.e., physical geology).” Coldigioco, 62021 Apiro, Italy A third focus of geology might be called “confi guration”—the study 2Centro de História das Ciências, Faculdade de Ciências da of the geometrical arrangement of parts of Earth. For example, some ge- Universidade de Lisboa, Edifício C4 - Piso 3, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal ologists quantify the shape of Earth’s surface using tools like airborne laser mapping and digital elevation models, or map the sea fl oor with echo sound- We thank Alessandro Iannace (2011) for his very interesting and ing and satellite geodesy. Geophysicists use seismic tomography to map the thought-provoking comments on our suggestion that geologists might confi guration of layers and seismic-velocity structures within Earth. trace the origin of geology back to the Copernican Revolution (Alvarez Even in the most obviously historical branches of geology, like stra- and Leitão, 2010). Iannace’s concern is that we were forcing geology into tigraphy, geologists begin by determining the confi guration of the rocks— the mold of physics, and were ignoring the fact that geology is a historical measuring sections, studying contacts and faults, and describing rock com- science with a quite distinct epistemology from physics. This was certain- positions and textures. It is this geometrical study, combined with what ly not our intention, for we completely agree with Iannace on the distinc- we have learned about the signifi cance of such features as sedimentary tion between historical sciences like geology and ahistorical sciences like structures, that allows us to interpret the history recorded in rocks. We do physics. However, as discussed below, the science of geology also con- not usually make a major distinction between confi gurational, process, and tains non-historical aspects that deal with confi guration and process, and historical geology. Surely, we do not believe that we are being geologists a balanced understanding of our science requires considering all aspects. when we make historical interpretations of outcrops, but something else— So the question appears to be this: Given that geology is a historical not geologists—when we measure and describe stratigraphic sections. science, should the Copernican Revolution be excluded from the history The Copernican Revolution focused on confi guration—with the Sun of geology because it did not deal with history, or should it be included at the center of the solar system, with no need for planetary epicycles, because it profoundly transformed the conception of the Earth? and with the Moon, but nothing else, orbiting Earth. And it focused on In that transformation, Earth came to be considered a planet. This process—all the planets orbiting the Sun, with the gravitational mecha- is a simple phrase but the concepts behind it are complex. It means that nism fi nally being understood by Newton. As with our modern studies of the old Aristotelian framework was rejected, that the fundamental dis- outcrops and stratigraphic sections, the historical interpretation could not tinction between an earthly realm and a terrestrial realm was abandoned, come until later. But we now understand the history of the solar system in and that Earth and the moving planetary lights in the sky were seen to be a general way, and the history of Earth itself in considerable detail. equivalent. The Copernican changes of the 17th century had repercussions Our second additional argument has to do with the need for geolo- beyond the fi elds of physics and astronomy, and made possible the subse- gists to interpret the complex evidence we uncover—a task generally quent rise of geology. avoided in the controlled experiments of physicists. The interpretation of The reading of Earth history from rocks came later, beginning with evidence is studied by the philosophical fi eld of hermeneutics, mentioned Steno in the 1660s as Iannace stresses, and we agree that this marked the by Iannace and summarized by Frodeman (1995), who stressed, even in beginning of geology as a historical science. We further note that Steno his title, that geology is “an interpretive and historical science.” The role of not only provided the tools for reading Earth history, by formulating the interpretation in geology is also emphasized by Baker (1999). laws of stratigraphy, but that using those tools, he worked out a very cred- The Copernican Revolution involved perhaps the greatest re-interpre- itable geologic history of Tuscany, limited only by his lack of methods for tation of the Earth imaginable. Before the Revolution, Earth was consid- dating rocks (Rodolico, 1971; Alvarez, 2009, p. 74–82). ered by western scholars to lie at the bottom of the cosmos, forming the Steno is widely accepted as the founder of geology as a historical sci- “cesspool where all fi lth and corruption fell and accumulated” (Alvarez ence. Could we also accept the Copernican Revolution as marking the be- and Leitão, 2010, p. 233). After the Revolution, it was understood to be one ginning of modern (i.e., post-Greco-Roman) geology in a broader sense? of the planets, ennobled and perfected, in the words of Galileo (Alvarez and This is, to some extent, a matter of emphasis and taste. Iannace ar- Leitão, 2010). We therefore continue to suggest that geologists could rec- gues that “a new science cannot be characterized merely by the object of ognize the Copernican Revolution as part of the history of geology without its research, Earth in this case, but requires in addition the utterly original in any way denying the character of geology as a historical science. epistemological foundation of its approach to the object itself—an ap- REFERENCES CITED proach that can be summarized in the use of history as the main tool for the Alvarez, W., 2009, The Mountains of Saint Francis: New York, W.W. Norton, 304 p. investigation of the planet.” While that is a defensible position, it seems Alvarez, W., and Leitão, H., 2010, The neglected early history of geology: The to us that an equally defensible, alternative view is that geology is indeed Copernican Revolution as a major advance in understanding the Earth: Geology, v. 38, p. 231–234, doi:10.1130/G30602.1. characterized by its object of study, Earth. We suggest that geology had to Baker, V.R., 1999, Geosemiosis: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 111, become a historical science, and the fi rst one, simply because it focused on p. 633–645, doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1999)111<0633:G>2.3.CO;2. the historically complex Earth. Frodeman, R., 1995, Geological reasoning: Geology as an interpretive and historical science: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 107, p. 960–968, Going beyond these reasonable alternative positions, let us raise two doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1995)107<0960:GRGAAI>2.3.CO;2. additional arguments for accepting the ahistorical Copernican Revolution Iannace, A., 2011, The neglected early history of Geology: The Copernican as part of the history of geology. Our fi rst additional argument is that al- Revolution as a major advance in understanding the Earth: Comment: though geology includes much emphasis on Earth history, other aspects of Geology, doi:10.1130/G31766C.1. Rodolico, F., 1971, Niels Stensen, founder of the geology of Tuscany, in Scherz, geology are not primarily historical. In a paper cited by Iannace, Frode- G., ed., Dissertations on Steno as Geologist: Odense, Denmark, Odense man (1995, note 20), while stressing the historical character of geology, Universitetsforlag, p. 237–243. © 2011 Geological Society of America. For permission to copy, contact Copyright Permissions, GSA, or [email protected]. GEOLOGY FORUM, September 2011 e247 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geology/article-pdf/39/9/e247/3542170/e247.pdf by guest on 02 October 2021.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • History of Geology
    FEBRUARY 2007 PRIMEFACT 563 (REPLACES MINFACT 60) History of geology Mineral Resources Early humans needed a knowledge of simple geology to enable them to select the most suitable rock types both for axe-heads and knives and for the ornamental stones they used in worship. In the Neolithic and Bronze Ages, about 5000 to 2500 BC, flint was mined in the areas which are now Belgium, Sweden, France, Portugal and Britain. While Stone Age cultures persisted in Britain until after 2000 BC, in the Middle East people began to mine useful minerals such as iron ore, tin, clay, gold and copper as early as 4000 BC. Smelting techniques were developed to make the manufacture of metal tools possible. Copper was probably the earliest metal to be smelted, that is, extracted from its ore by melting. Copper is obtained easily by reducing the green copper carbonate mineral malachite, itself regarded as a precious stone. From 4000 BC on, the use of clay for brick-making became widespread. The Reverend William Branwhite Clarke (1798-1878), smelting of iron ore for making of tools and the ‘father’ of geology in New South Wales weapons began in Asia Minor at about 1300 BC but did not become common in Western Europe until Aristotle believed volcanic eruptions and nearly 500 BC. earthquakes were caused by violent winds escaping from the interior of the earth. Since earlier writers had ascribed these phenomena to The classical period supernatural causes, Aristotle's belief was a By recognising important surface processes at marked step forward. Eratosthenes, a librarian at work, the Greek, Arabic and Roman civilisations Alexandria at about 200 BC, made surprisingly contributed to the growth of knowledge about the accurate measurements of the circumference of earth.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGY THEME STUDY Page 1
    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARKS Dr. Harry A. Butowsky GEOLOGY THEME STUDY Page 1 Geology National Historic Landmark Theme Study (Draft 1990) Introduction by Dr. Harry A. Butowsky Historian, History Division National Park Service, Washington, DC The Geology National Historic Landmark Theme Study represents the second phase of the National Park Service's thematic study of the history of American science. Phase one of this study, Astronomy and Astrophysics: A National Historic Landmark Theme Study was completed in l989. Subsequent phases of the science theme study will include the disciplines of biology, chemistry, mathematics, physics and other related sciences. The Science Theme Study is being completed by the National Historic Landmarks Survey of the National Park Service in compliance with the requirements of the Historic Sites Act of l935. The Historic Sites Act established "a national policy to preserve for public use historic sites, buildings and objects of national significance for the inspiration and benefit of the American people." Under the terms of the Act, the service is required to survey, study, protect, preserve, maintain, or operate nationally significant historic buildings, sites & objects. The National Historic Landmarks Survey of the National Park Service is charged with the responsibility of identifying America's nationally significant historic property. The survey meets this obligation through a comprehensive process involving thematic study of the facets of American History. In recent years, the survey has completed National Historic Landmark theme studies on topics as diverse as the American space program, World War II in the Pacific, the US Constitution, recreation in the United States and architecture in the National Parks.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Geological Science – Silvia F
    GEOLOGY – History of Geological Science – Silvia F. de M. Figueiroa HISTORY OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCE Silvia F. de M. Figueirôa Department of Geological Education, Institute of Geosciences / University of Campinas (UNICAMP), P.O. box 6152 13083-970, Campinas-SP, Brazil Keywords: history, geology, mineralogy, paleontology, earth, mining, geological surveys, maps, gemstones, stratigraphy, fossils. Contents 1. Beginnings 2. Middle Ages and the Renaissance 3. The ‘Scientific revolution’ and its long-lasting impacts 4. Industrial Revolution, the search for raw materials and the survey of territories Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary This chapter aims to provide a broad picture of the development of geological science, as detailed as possible. Geology as a modern science started roughly around two centuries ago. But as knowledge of the Earth it has existed since the beginnings of humankind. We begin by mentioning the ideas of ancient peoples – Greeks and Romans. We continue up to the Renaissance (15th century), explaining that practically all schools of thought shared a fairly integrated and unified vision of all the Cosmos. In a Geocentric world, Earth suffered the influence of all other planets and stars and so did everything in it, whether it was human, animal, vegetal or mineral. The planet was not composed only of its own element, but also by fire, water and air, as Aristotle had already postulated. The context of the so-called ‘Scientific Revolution’ implicated profound changes and discoveries that led to a conceptual revision of the knowledge about the Earth: Astronomy redefined by Copernicus denied the central place of the earth in the planetary system. At the same time, the construction and use of the telescope showed that the world was almost infinitely large, and that Earth and the Solar System did not occupy a special place in the Universe.
    [Show full text]
  • GSA TODAY North-Central, P
    Vol. 9, No. 10 October 1999 INSIDE • 1999 Honorary Fellows, p. 16 • Awards Nominations, p. 18, 20 • 2000 Section Meetings GSA TODAY North-Central, p. 27 A Publication of the Geological Society of America Rocky Mountain, p. 28 Cordilleran, p. 30 Refining Rodinia: Geologic Evidence for the Australia–Western U.S. connection in the Proterozoic Karl E. Karlstrom, [email protected], Stephen S. Harlan*, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131 Michael L. Williams, Department of Geosciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 01003-5820, [email protected] James McLelland, Department of Geology, Colgate University, Hamilton, NY 13346, [email protected] John W. Geissman, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, [email protected] Karl-Inge Åhäll, Earth Sciences Centre, Göteborg University, Box 460, SE-405 30 Göteborg, Sweden, [email protected] ABSTRACT BALTICA Prior to the Grenvillian continent- continent collision at about 1.0 Ga, the southern margin of Laurentia was a long-lived convergent margin that SWEAT TRANSSCANDINAVIAN extended from Greenland to southern W. GOTHIAM California. The truncation of these 1.8–1.0 Ga orogenic belts in southwest- ern and northeastern Laurentia suggests KETILIDEAN that they once extended farther. We propose that Australia contains the con- tinuation of these belts to the southwest LABRADORIAN and that Baltica was the continuation to the northeast. The combined orogenic LAURENTIA system was comparable in
    [Show full text]
  • The Educational Value of the History of Geomorphology
    Geomorphology 47 (2002) 313–323 www.elsevier.com/locate/geomorph The educational value of the history of geomorphology Dorothy Sack* Department of Geography, 122 Clippinger Labs, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701 USA Received 12 December 1999; received in revised form 10 January 2000; accepted 25 October 2001 Abstract The history of geomorphology can be a valuable tool for educating students of geomorphology. The largest and most available record of what geomorphologists thought and did in the past is their original published work. Also available are some fine papers on the history of geomorphology that review and analyze primary sources and past events in the discipline in order to generalize, explain trends, and reveal historical associations. Interest in the history of the discipline varies widely, of course, among geomorphologists. Nevertheless, several educational benefits, in addition to explaining the academic affiliation of geomorphology with two separate disciplines, can be derived from incorporating the history of geomorphology into university-level geomorphology courses. History is a popular subject, and presenting some geomorphic concepts using a historical approach can help to maintain or stimulate student interest. Because of the tendency for older literature to contain more qualitative description and methodological detail than more recent literature, undergraduate students may comprehend some concepts better from older papers. By reading the original literature, students determine for themselves what previous practitioners accomplished, rather than relying solely on the interpretations of others. Reading original literature also helps students realize that older does not mean less intelligent, and that like the critical reading of recent geomorphic literature, the critical reading of historic geomorphic papers can provide a wealth of new research ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Explanatory Notes for the Plate-Tectonic Map of the Circum-Pacific Region
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP SHEETS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCUM-PACIFIC PLATE-TECTONIC MAP SERIES Explanatory Notes for the Plate-Tectonic Map of the Circum-Pacific Region By GEORGE W. MOORE CIRCUM-PACIFIC COUNCIL_a t ENERGY AND MINERAL \il/ RESOURCES THE ARCTIC SHEET OF THIS SERIES IS AVAILABLE FROM U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MAP DISTRIBUTION BOX 25286, FEDERAL CENTER, DENVER, COLORADO 80225, USA OTHER SHEETS IN THIS SERIES AVAILABLE FROM THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PETROLEUM GEOLOGISTS BOX 979 TULSA, OKLAHOMA 74101, USA 1992 CIRCUM-PACIFIC COUNCIL FOR ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES Michel T. Halbouty, Chair CIRCUM-PACIFIC MAP PROJECT John A. Reinemund, Director George Gryc, General Chair Explanatory Notes to Supplement the PLATE-TECTONIC MAP OF THE CIRCUM-PACIFIC REGION Jose Corvalan Dv Chair, Southeast Quadrant Panel lan W.D. Dalziel, Chair, Antarctic Panel Kenneth J. Drummond, Chair, Northeast Quadrant Panel R. Wallace Johnson, Chair, Southwest Quadrant Panel George W. Moore, Chair, Arctic Panel Tomoyuki Moritani, Chair, Northwest Quadrant Panel TECTONIC ELEMENTS George W. Moore, Department of Geosciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA Nikita A. Bogdanov, Institute of the Lithosphere, Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia Jose Corvalan, Servicio Nacional de Geologia y Mineria, Santiago, Chile Campbell Craddock, Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin H. Frederick Doutch, Bureau of Mineral Resources, Canberra, Australia Kenneth J. Drummond, Mobil Oil Canada, Ltd., Calgary, Alberta, Canada Chikao Nishiwaki, Institute for International Mineral Resources Development, Fujinomiya, Japan Tomotsu Nozawa, Geological Survey of Japan, Tsukuba, Japan Gordon H. Packham, Department of Geophysics, University of Sydney, Australia Solomon M.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Geology Division
    THE HISTORY OF GEOLOGY DIVISION Volume 28, Number 1 http://gsahist.org MARCH 2004 HISTORY OF GEOLOGY DIVISION INITIATES STUDENT AWARD GSA’s History of Geology Division is soliciting proposals for a student award for the amount of $500 for a paper to be given at the GSA Annual Meeting. This new award is made possible by a bequest from the estate of Mary Rabbitt. The first award will be presented at the Denver meeting, November 7-10, 2004. We invite all faculty mentors to encourage their students to consider this award as they are preparing their theses and dissertations. Both undergraduate and graduate students are eligible. While both oral and poster presentations are acceptable, oral presentations are preferred. Faculty advisors may be listed as second author but not as the lead author of the paper. The proposed paper may be: (1) A paper in the history of geology; or (2) A literature review of ideas for a technical work or thesis/dissertation; or (3) Some imaginative aspect of the history of geology we have not thought of before. The award shall consist of $500 to be applied to student expenses to attend the GSA Annual Meeting and present a paper in the History of Geology Division disciplinary session. It is open to all students regardless of discipline, provided the proposed paper is related to the history of a geological idea/person/etc. After the applications have been received and reviewed by the Award Committee, the winner will be notified. The winner must then register for the GSA Annual Meeting and present his or her paper at the History of Geology Division disciplinary session.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions to the History of Geomorphology and Quaternary Geology: an Introduction
    Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on October 1, 2021 Contributions to the history of geomorphology and Quaternary geology: an introduction DAVID R. OLDROYD1 & RODNEY H. GRAPES2 1School of History and Philosophy, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia (e-mail: [email protected]) 2Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Korea University, Seoul, 136-701, Korea (e-mail: [email protected]) This Special Publication deals with various aspects the Baltic States in 2006, where a great deal of of the histories of geomorphology and Quaternary what the geologist sees consists of Quaternary geology in different parts of the world. Geomor- sediments. However, much of the Earth’s surface phology is the study of landforms and the processes is not formed of these sediments but of older that shape them, past and present. Quaternary rocks exposed at the surface by erosion and struc- geology studies the sediments and associated tural displacement. Here, geomorphology can seek materials that have come to mantle much of answers to questions regarding the past histories of Earth’s surface during the relatively recent Pleisto- these rocks, their subsequent erosion, and present cene and Holocene epochs. Geomorphology, with location and form. Geomorphology also raises its concern for Earth’s surface features and pro- questions, and may provide answers, regarding tec- cesses, deals with information that is much more tonic issues, for example from deformed marine amenable to observation and measurement than is terraces and offset fault systems. In all these the case for most geological work. Quaternary instances, the history of geological and geomor- geology focuses mostly, but not exclusively, on phological investigations can serve to illustrate the Earth’s surficial sedimentary cover, which is both the progress and pitfalls involved in the scien- usually more accessible than the harder rocks of tific understanding of the Earth’s surface and the deeper past.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Geology Division
    THE HISTORY OF GEOLOGY DIVISION Volume 30, Number 3 http://gsahist.org September 2006 PHILADELPHIA – October 20-25, 2006 HISTORY GROUPS CELEBRATE ANNIVERSARIES The Geological Society of America’s History of Geology Division (HoG) and the History of Earth Sciences Society (HESS) are celebrating milestone anniversaries at the 2006 GSA Annual Meeting in Philadelphia. The History of Geology Division/GSA George W. White, University of Illinois, who had played a significant role in establishing the International Union of Geological Sciences' International Commission on the History of Geological Sciences (INHIGEO), was interested in getting a similar group started within GSA. White was joined in this effort by Cecil J. Schneer of the University of New Hampshire. The result of this joint effort was the creation of our History of Geology Division which was approved by the GSA Council in November 1976 at the GSA Annual Meeting in Denver: "It is with real pleasure that the officers, Council, and headquarters staff welcome the newly established History of Geology Division" (John C. Frye, GSA Executive Director; Division Newsletter, v. 1, no. 1, February 1977). The stated purpose of the Division has changed little over the past 30 years: "Purpose. The purpose of the division is to provide a suitable forum for presentation of papers on history of geology and discussion of problems of interest in the study of the history of geology and the development of the geological sciences, and to act as an organized group in promoting these objectives within the framework of the Geological Society of America" (Division Bylaws, February 1977).
    [Show full text]
  • GEOL 1 Physical Geology(C-ID GEOL 101)
    Lassen Community College Course Outline GEOL-1 Physical Geology 4.0 Units I. Catalog Description Pursuit of understanding the physical classification of rocks and minerals of the earth as a whole and its past, present and future evolutionary processes. Unifying concepts such as plate tectonics and its implications, the magnitude of geologic time, uniformitarianism, and the ramifications of the fossil record will be explored. This course includes field trips to areas of geological interest. This course has been approved for online and hybrid delivery Recommended Preparation: Successful completion of ENGL105 or equivalent multiple measures placement. Transfers to both UC/CSU General Education Area: A CSU GE Area: B1 & B3 IGETC GE Area: 5A & 5C C-ID GEOL 101 51 Hours Lecture, 51 Hours Lab Scheduled: Fall II. Coding Information Repeatability: Not Repeatable, Take 1 Time Grading Option: Graded or Pass/No Pass Credit Type: Credit - Degree Applicable TOP Code: 191400 III. Course Objectives A. Course Student Learning Outcomes Upon completion of this course the student will be able to: 1. Describe the unifying concepts of Geology. 2. Given a specific geological feature use the unifying concepts of Geology to explain the past, present, and future of the feature. B. Course Objectives Upon completion of this course the student will be able to: 1. Discuss physical geology. 2. Describe the major concepts of physical geology. 3. Describe why it is worthwhile to learn about physical geology such as petroleum, metals, etc. 4. Discuss the formation of natural resourcs. 5. Discuss the hydrologic cycle. 6. Explain the scientific method. 7. Differentiate between the continental crust and the ocean crust .
    [Show full text]
  • GSA TODAY February and University of California, Berkeley Serves to Strengthen PEP by Providing Vol
    Vol. 5, No. 2 February 1995 INSIDE • Honorary Fellows, p. 30 GSA TODAY • Rocky Mountain Section Meeting, p. 37 A Publication of the Geological Society of America • Cordilleran Section Meeting, p. 40 Farthest North: Ocean Drilling in the Arctic Gateway Region Leg 151 Shipboard Scientific Party ABSTRACT The Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) recently recovered the first deep-drilled sediment sequences from the Arctic Ocean, on Leg 151 in July–September 1993. The ODP drill- ship Resolution took advantage of late summer low-ice conditions in the region northwest of Svalbard to drill three sequences on the Yermak Plateau at lat ~80°N and long 5°–8°E. Despite being chased away several times by advancing sea ice, ODP Leg 151 successfully obtained the northernmost long sediment cores (>500 m) ever drilled. The sediment Figure 1. Left: Finnish icebreaker Fennica patrolling sea ice on the Yermak Plateau in the Arctic Ocean at lat ~80°N. Photo by Suzanne O’Connell, Wesleyan University. sequences obtained provide the first Above: Laminated biosiliceous oozes from the late Eocene on the East Greenland opportunity for high-resolution margin (site 913), showing rich green and blue surficial coloration attributed to the records of arctic climates and paleo- presence of vivianite. Photo by ODP Operations Superintendent Gene Pollard. ceanography from the mid-Pliocene to present. Surprisingly high sedi- mentation rates involving high fluxes of glacially derived dropstones and terrigenous detritus attest to relying on the transpolar drift of the circumarctic continental ice sheets and Current, making this area inaccessible dynamic circumarctic continental sea ice. As chronicled in Nansen’s the arctic sea ice, and their subsequent for deep-sea drilling by ships without ice sheets at least episodically since (1899) account of the journey and evolution in Quaternary glacial-inter- icebreaker capabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference on the History of Geologic Pioneers, August 2–5, 2000
    work of Eaton, founder and first professor much of the rest of the United States. With of the Rensselaer School in 1824, that the Emmons, Hall was cofounder of the Conference study of geological science in America took American Association of Geologists, the a giant leap forward. Eaton was so predecessor of the American Association influential during these early years that in for the Advancement of Science. on the American geology, 1818–1836 is known as Edgerton was one of the geologists the Eatonian era. Eaton and Emmons had trained. He was Among the most influential students of born in Burlington, Vermont, and was 21 Eaton was Hall, State Geologist of New years old (1825), when he entered RPI. In History of York, who was known as the father of the 1826, he became adjunct to Eaton and geosyncline. In 1857 (published in 1859), remained in this position until after Hall observed that, where the Paleozoic graduation (fall 1828; Nason, 1887). After marine strata are thin (a few hundred or a leaving RPI, he became professor of natural Geologic few thousand meters thick), they are flat science at the Utica Gymnasium, where lying. In contrast, within the Appalachians, James D. Dana (1813–1895) became his thicknesses of equivalent age strata amount student. Pioneers, to tens of thousands of meters, and the Edgerton’s title almost matched Dana’s strata are not horizontal. Hall hypothesized choice of a profession: He wanted to that the subsidence of the strata within a pursue his interest in natural history (Dana, trough, where they would be extra thick, 1835; Newell, 1997).
    [Show full text]