DOCSLIB.ORG

The American Liberty League, 1934-1940 Author(S): Frederick Rudolph Source: the American Historical Review, Vol

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The American Liberty League, 1934-1940 Author(S): Frederick Rudolph Source: the American Historical Review, Vol The American Liberty League, 1934-1940 Author(s): Frederick Rudolph Source: The American Historical Review, Vol. 56, No. 1 (Oct., 1950), pp. 19-33 Published by: American Historical Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1840619 Accessed: 06/07/2010 21:45 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=aha. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. American Historical Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The American Historical Review. http://www.jstor.org The AmericanLiberty League, 1934-1940 FREDERICK RUDOLPH IN March,1934, the New Deal was a yearold. The economiccollapse which had provokedit and the confusedbut determinedactivities of the New Deal had become,by then,profoundly disturbing to men whosegods wereAdam Smith and HerbertSpencer. For them both the depressionand Franklin Roosevelt'ssolutions contained unwholesome quantities of uncertaintyand change. Correspondence,reflecting despair and anger, flowed from one citadelof economicpower to another,most of it destinedto remainin the privatefiles for which it was intended.Some of it, however,found its way into the chambersof Congressand eventuallyinto the public press.There the anguish of what has come to be called the AmericanWay was from time to time documentedand recorded.Of such a characterwas the ex- change of lettersbetween the Du Pont Building in Wilmingtonand the Empire State Building in New York in March, 1934, betweenR. R. M. Carpenter,a retiredDu Pont vice-president,and JohnJ. Raskob, a retired chairmanof the Democraticparty but a stillactive vice-president of the Du Pontorganization. "Five negroeson myplace in South Carolinarefused work this spring. sayingthey had easy jobs withthe government,"Carpenter wrote. "A cook on mryhouseboat at Fort Myersquit becausethe government was payinghim a dollar an hour as a painter."What Mr. Carpenterasked of Mr. Raskob was thathe, who mighthave the ear of thePresident for the asking,inquire of Mr. Rooseveltwhether he knew wherethe countrywas going; his own experiences,at his place in South Carolina and on his houseboatin Florida, had convincedhim thatthe directionswere altogethercontrary to American promise.Mr. Raskob was inclinedto agree,but, he said, he was now out of politicsand, besides,he had a betteridea. "You haven'tmuch to do," he wroteCarpenter, "and I know of no one thatcould bettertake the lead in tryingto inducethe Du Pont and GeneralMotors groups, followed by other big industries,to definitelyorganize to protectsociety from the sufferings whichit is bound to endureif we allow communisticelements to lead the people to believethat all businessmenare crooks."Raskob went on to sug- gest thatthere was a need for"some verydefinite organization that would come out openlywith some plan foreducating the peopleto the value of en- couragingpeople to work; encouragingpeople to get rich." He feltthat I9 20 FrederickRudolph R. R. M. Carpenter,and his friendsPierre and Ireneedu Pont,were es- peciallyequipped to takeon thattask, for they were "in a positionto talk directlywith a groupthat controls a largershare of industry. thanany othergroup in theUnited States."1 Of suchbeginnings was theAmerican Liberty League. On AugustI5, 1934, an organizationsuch as Raskobhad contemplatedwas charteredin Washington,D.C., dedicatedto "teachthe necessity of respect for the rights ofpersons and property ... and ... theduty of government toencourage and protectindividual and groupinitiative and enterprise,to foster the right to work,earn, save and acquireproperty, and to preservethe ownership and lawfuluse of propertywhen acquired."2 And fromits birth until its death, its mostfaithful financial backers were the Du Pontand GeneralMotors groupsupon whom Raskob had counted.3 The LibertyLeague was as indigenouslyAmerican as the New Deal whichit was determined todestroy. Its unsuccessful efforts tounseat Franklin Roosevelt,its philosophy and program, the techniques which it usedin order to surviveas longas it did-theseare notthe materials of an un-American movement.They are the compound of a setof emphases which, although they foundlittle support in theNew Deal, areas mucha partof the structure of Americanvalues as are thosewhich have been carried along in succeeding Democraticadministrations since 1932. The LibertyLeague representeda vigorousand well-stateddefense of nineteenthcentury individualism and liberalism,a more explicit and determinedelaboration of thatposition than willbe foundelsewhere in Americanhistory. It wasorganized at a timewhen byand large the philosophy of rugged individualism had stopped performing in Americansociety, but thatis not to saythat it had lostall function-it stillretained, for example, a stronghold upon the imaginationsof men whoseexperiences supported its promises. Although the New Deal and the historyof Americanpolitical preferences since I932 hardlyargues for the survivalof theposition which the Liberty League maintained, there was too muchof a thoroughlyAmerican character in themovement to permitthe 1 New York Times,Dec. 2I, I934. The correspondencewas disclosedduring the Nye muni- tionshearings in the Senate.When JouettShouse, president of the League, informedthe press of the formationof the organization,he disclosedthat Raskob was one of its primemovers. Ibid.,Aug. 23, I934. 2 AmericanLiberty League, AmericanLiberty League: A Statementof Its Principlesand Purposes(Washington, I934). '3 The League made periodicreports to Congresson the stateof its financesand the source of its income.These may be foundreported in the New York Times forJan. II, I935; Jan.26, I936; Mar. I7, I936; Apr. 9, I936; JuneI2, I936; Sept. I2, I936; Oct. 22, I936; Jan.8, I937; Mar. I2, I937; JuneI2, 3937; Sept. II, I937; Mar. II, I938. A studyof the reportsindicates thatthe League spentover a milliondollars; that Shouse, in I936, was the highestpaid political organizerin the UnitedStates, at a salaryof $36,ooo and $i8,ooo forexpenses; and thatof the $483,000 collectedin I935, over one thirdwas contributedby membersof the Du Pont family. The American Liberty League, I934-40 2 1 conclusionthat it was an unimportant,flash-in-the-pan combination of un- dercoverpolitical party and overtpressure group. The AmericanLiberty League was much more than that.Indeed, it symbolizedessentially old and establishedtraditions and valuescoming face to facewith new social,political, and economicfacts. In such a case, new facts,however unalterable, do not immediatelysucceed in overcomingold values. At least until now, it has been the natureof civilizedsocieties that men have complicatedtheir lives by seekingto reconcilethe irreconcilable;such, in a way, was the aim of the AmericanLiberty League. It emphasizedthe values which,by its lights,de- servedencouragement and protectionfrom new factsat whichit balked,and from certainother values in the societywhich it chose to ignore or de- emphasize. At a time when the Republicanparty was bankruptof leadershipand purpose,the AmericanLiberty League becamethe spokesmanfor a business civilization,and a defenderof that civilizationfrom the attacksof the ad- ministrationin Washingtonand of lessergroups from the rightand the left, thefollowers of FatherCoughlin, the Townsendites, the Socialists, the Share- the-Wealthmovement of Huey Long. "Businesswhich bears the responsi- bilityfor the paychecksof privateemployment has littlevoice in govern- ment,"it complainedin itsStatement of Principlesand Purposes,proceeding then to become in the mid-thirtiesthe mouthpieceof organizedAmerican conservatism.4At a time when economicdistress encouraged an increasing emphasisupon the forgottenman and the commonman, it came to the de- fense of the uncommonman who stood at the pinnacle-the uncommon man, whose freedomto followthe bentof his naturaltalents, unfettered by governmentregulation and control,had long been an ingrainedtenet of the Americanfaith. The rosterof itsofficers and of itschief financial contributors is a rosterof the uncommonmen of the time,the men whose ambitionsand abilitieshad been rewardedwith the success,the power,and the prestigeto whichAmericans of everybackground have been traditionallyconditioned to aspire: Irenee,Pierre, and Lammot du Pont, controllersof a vast industrial empire;Ernest T. Wier, steelman; Will L. Clayton,Texas cottonbroker; AlfredP. Sloan, presidentof GeneralMotors; Edward F. Hutton,chairman of GeneralFoods; J.Howard Pew, presidentof Sun Oil; William S. Knud- sen,also of GeneralMotors; Joseph E. Widener,Philadelphia transportation magnate;Sewell
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The American Liberty League and the Rise of Constitutional Nationalism Jared Goldstein Roger Williams University School of Law
    Roger Williams University DOCS@RWU Law Faculty Scholarship Law Faculty Scholarship Winter 2014 The American Liberty League and the Rise of Constitutional Nationalism Jared Goldstein Roger Williams University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.rwu.edu/law_fac_fs Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Law and Politics Commons Recommended Citation Jared A. Goldstein, The American Liberty League and the Rise of Constitutional Nationalism, 86 Temp. L. Rev. 287, 330 (2014) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Faculty Scholarship at DOCS@RWU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Law Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of DOCS@RWU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. +(,121/,1( Citation: Jared A. Goldstein, The American Liberty League and the Rise of Constitutional Nationalism, 86 Temp. L. Rev. 287, 330 (2014) Provided by: Roger Williams University School of Law Library Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline Thu Nov 16 15:40:33 2017 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: Copyright Information Use QR Code reader to send PDF to your smartphone or tablet device THE AMERICAN LIBERTY LEAGUE AND THE RISE OF CONSTITUTIONAL NATIONALISM JaredA. Goldstein* This Article launches a project to identify constitutional nationalism-the conviction that the nation'sfundamentalvalues are embodied in the Constitution-as a recurring phenomenon in American public life that has profoundly affected both popular and elite understandingof the Constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • American Civil Associations and the Growth of American Government: an Appraisal of Alexis De Tocqueville’S Democracy in America (1835-1840) Applied to Franklin D
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 2-2017 American Civil Associations and the Growth of American Government: An Appraisal of Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America (1835-1840) Applied to Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal and the Post-World War II Welfare State John P. Varacalli The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1828 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] AMERICAN CIVIL ASSOCIATIONS AND THE GROWTH OF AMERICAN GOVERNMENT: AN APPRAISAL OF ALEXIS DE TOCQUEVILLE’S DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA (1835- 1840) APPLIED TO FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT’S NEW DEAL AND THE POST-WORLD WAR II WELFARE STATE by JOHN P. VARACALLI A master’s thesis submitted to the Graduate Program in Liberal Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, The City University of New York 2017 © 2017 JOHN P. VARACALLI All Rights Reserved ii American Civil Associations and the Growth of American Government: An Appraisal of Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America (1835-1840) Applied to Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal and the Post World War II Welfare State by John P. Varacalli The manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Liberal Studies in satisfaction of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Arts ______________________ __________________________________________ Date David Gordon Thesis Advisor ______________________ __________________________________________ Date Elizabeth Macaulay-Lewis Acting Executive Officer THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii ABSTRACT American Civil Associations and the Growth of American Government: An Appraisal of Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America (1835-1840) Applied to Franklin D.
    [Show full text]
  • SUBJECT FILES, 1933-1964 153 Linear Feet, 2 Linear Inches (350 LGA-S Boxes) Herbert Hoover Presidential Library
    Stanford HERBERT HOOVER PAPERS POST PRESIDENTIAL SUBJECT FILES, 1933-1964 153 linear feet, 2 linear inches (350 LGA-S boxes) Herbert Hoover Presidential Library FOLDER LIST Box Contents 1 A General (5 folders) Academy of American Poets, 1934-1959 Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences, Hoover tribute to Ethel Barrymore, 1949 Acheson, Secretary of State Dean - Clippings, 1945-1951 Adams, John – letter to his son, Dec 17, 1800 (reproduction) Advertising Club of New York, 1939-1963 Advertising Council, 1961 Advertising Gold Medal Award of Printers' Ink Publishing Company, 1960-1963 Africa, 1957-1963 African-American Institute, 1958 2 Agricultural Hall of Fame, 1959 Agriculture General, 1934-1953 California Farm Debt Adjustment Committee, 1934-1935 Clippings, 1933-1936 (7 folders) 3 Clippings, 1936-1958, undated (7 folders) Comments and Suggestions, 1933-1935 (3 folders) 4 Comments and Suggestions, 1936-1951, undated (5 folders) Congressional Record, House and Senate Bills, 1917, 1933-1937, 1942-1943 Commodities Cotton, 1934-1943 Wheat, 1933-1943 Farmers' Independence Council of America, 1935-1936 International, 1933-1934 5 Printed Matter, 1934-1953 and undated (2 folders) Statistics, 1940-1944 Agriculture Department Agricultural Adjustment Administration (AAA) Expenditures for 1935 by state, 1936 Printed Material 1933-1941 (2 folders) Bureau of Agricultural Economics Agricultural Finance Review, 1942-1944 6 Agricultural Prices, 1943-1945 (3 folders) Agricultural Situation, 1943-1946 Cotton Situation, 1943 Crop Production, 1942-1946 (4
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Overspeech
    ARTICLES CONGRESSIONAL OVERSPEECH Josh Chafetz* Political theater. Spectacle. Circus. Reality show. We are constantly told that, whatever good congressional oversight is, it certainly is not those things. Observers and participants across the ideological and partisan spectrums use those descriptions as pejorative attempts to delegitimize oversight conducted by their political opponents or as cautions to their own allies of what is to be avoided. Real oversight, on this consensus view, is about fact-finding, not about performing for an audience. As a result, when oversight is done right, it is both civil and consensus-building. While plenty of oversight activity does indeed involve bipartisan attempts to collect information and use that information to craft policy, this Article seeks to excavate and theorize a different way of using oversight tools, a way that focuses primarily on their use as a mechanism of public communication. I refer to such uses as congressional overspeech. After briefly describing the authority, tools and methods, and consensus understanding of oversight in Part I, this Article turns to an analysis of overspeech in Part II. The three central features of overspeech are its communicativity, its performativity, and its divisiveness, and each of these is analyzed in some detail. Finally, Part III offers two detailed case studies of overspeech: the Senate Munitions Inquiry of the mid-1930s and the McCarthy and Army-McCarthy Hearings of the early 1950s. These case studies not only demonstrate the dynamics of overspeech in action but also illustrate that overspeech is both continuous across and adaptive to different media environments. Moreover, the case studies illustrate that overspeech can be used in the service of normatively good, normatively bad, and * Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center.
    [Show full text]
  • 19. the New Deal Democrats: Franklin D. Roosevelt and the Democratic Party
    fdr4freedoms 1 19. The New Deal Democrats: Franklin D. Roosevelt and the Democratic Party With Franklin D. Roosevelt at its helm, the Democratic Party underwent a historic transformation. Before FDR rose to national prominence in the early 1930s, the party had represented a loose conglomeration of local and regional interests. Dominated by the “solid South” that dated to post–Civil War Reconstruction, this group also included Great Plains and Western farmers influenced by the Populist and Progressive movements, as well as the burgeoning ethnic populations of the great cities of the North and East, where the “machine politics” epitomized by New York City’s Tammany Hall ruled the day. Above: A banner for Franklin D. Roosevelt over a pawnshop in This diverse assemblage did not adhere to a central Rosslyn, Virginia, September 1936. ideology or political philosophy, but was instead heavily In November, FDR would outdo his influenced by religious and geographical identities and electoral margins of 1932, winning all but two states and the highest interests. Democrats might be found on both sides of a percentage of electoral votes since variety of political issues. Ironically, the party was home to the virtually uncontested election both the new waves of heavily Catholic and Jewish immigrants of 1820. of the Northeast and the extremely anti-Catholic and nativist Left: A poster for Franklin D. Ku Klux Klan of the South. Roosevelt’s 1932 campaign for president, calling for “action” and The Republicans enjoyed significant support across a fairly “constructive leadership.” The Great wide spectrum of the American political landscape. That party Depression was so cataclysmic that was heavily favored by northern white Protestants, small and it created an appetite for change in America, helping FDR lead a large business interests, professional white-collar workers, historic shift in voting patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Università LUISS “Guido Carli”
    Università LUISS “Guido Carli” Facoltà di Scienze Politiche Corso di Laurea in Scienze Politiche Dopo la Ragione. Eric Voegelin e Michael Oakeshott fra crisi del liberalismo e rinascita del pensiero conservatore. Relatore: Prof. Sebastiano MAFFETTONE Tesi di Laurea di: Tommaso MILANI Matricola: 057462 Anno Accademico 2008/2009 Indice Generale Avvertenza relativa alle indicazioni bibliografiche……………………………….. p. 4 Cap. I. Introduzione. Conservatorismo: uno, nessuno, centomila par. I: Un secolo conservatore? ………………………………………………. p. 6 par. II: Il potere delle idee ……………………………………......................... p. 8 par. III: La definizione situazionale e i suoi limiti ………………………......... p. 12 par. IV: Alle radici dell’ideologia conservatrice ……………........................... p. 14 Cap. II. La vita e i tempi dell’ordine liberale par. I: Capire il New Deal: il ruolo delle idee ………………………………… p. 17 par. I.1: Contro l’economia classica: Adolf A. Berle e Rexford G. Tugwell ….. p. 26 par. I.2: Rinnovare il liberalismo: John Dewey e John Maynard Keynes ............ p. 32 par. I.3: La scienza politica al servizio della trasformazione: Charles E. Merriam ………………………………………………………………………… p. 38 par. II: L’entrata in guerra: declino e tramonto della «Old Right» ……………. p. 44 par. III: Il secondo dopoguerra: il trionfo delle scienze sociali e l’esaurimento del riformismo ………………………………….................................................. p. 50 par. IV: L’eredità del New Deal: il “liberal consensus” ……………………….. p. 56 Cap. III. Liberalismo rivisitato: Berlin, Talmon, Hayek, Niebuhr par. I: Liberalismo realista e liberalismo critico ……………………………….. p. 73 par. II : C’est la faute à Rousseau: la critica all’Illuminismo giacobino ……… p. 80 par. II.1: Isaiah Berlin e i nemici della libertà umana ………………………… p. 80 par. II.2: Jacob L. Talmon e la democrazia totalitaria ………………………… p.
    [Show full text]
  • New Deal Nemesis the “Old Right” Jeffersonians
    SUBSCRIBE NOW AND RECEIVE CRISIS AND LEVIATHAN* FREE! “The Independent Review does not accept “The Independent Review is pronouncements of government officials nor the excellent.” conventional wisdom at face value.” —GARY BECKER, Noble Laureate —JOHN R. MACARTHUR, Publisher, Harper’s in Economic Sciences Subscribe to The Independent Review and receive a free book of your choice* such as the 25th Anniversary Edition of Crisis and Leviathan: Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government, by Founding Editor Robert Higgs. This quarterly journal, guided by co-editors Christopher J. Coyne, and Michael C. Munger, and Robert M. Whaples offers leading-edge insights on today’s most critical issues in economics, healthcare, education, law, history, political science, philosophy, and sociology. Thought-provoking and educational, The Independent Review is blazing the way toward informed debate! Student? Educator? Journalist? Business or civic leader? Engaged citizen? This journal is for YOU! *Order today for more FREE book options Perfect for students or anyone on the go! The Independent Review is available on mobile devices or tablets: iOS devices, Amazon Kindle Fire, or Android through Magzter. INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE, 100 SWAN WAY, OAKLAND, CA 94621 • 800-927-8733 • [email protected] PROMO CODE IRA1703 New Deal Nemesis The “Old Right” Jeffersonians —————— ✦ —————— SHELDON RICHMAN “Th[e] central question is not clarified, it is obscured, by our common political categories of left, right, and center.” —CARL OGLESBY, Containment and Change odern ignorance about the Old Right was made stark by reactions to H. L. Mencken’s diary, published in 1989. The diary received M extraordinary attention, and reviewers puzzled over Mencken’s opposition to the beloved Franklin Roosevelt, to the New Deal, and to U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Interest Groups and Supreme Court Commerce Clause Regulation, 1920-1937
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 12-2018 Interest Groups and Supreme Court Commerce Clause Regulation, 1920-1937 Barrett L. Anderson Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Anderson, Barrett L., "Interest Groups and Supreme Court Commerce Clause Regulation, 1920-1937" (2018). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 7329. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/7329 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INTEREST GROUPS AND SUPREME COURT COMMERCE CLAUSE REGULATION, 1920-1937 by Barrett L. Anderson A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Political Science Approved: ______________________ ____________________ Robert Ross, Ph.D. Greg Goelzhauser, Ph.D. Major Professor Committee Member ______________________ ____________________ Randy Simmons, Ph.D. Laurens H. Smith, Ph.D. Committee Member Interim Vice President for Research and Dean of the School of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2018 ii Copyright © Barrett Anderson 2018 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Interest Groups and Supreme Court Commerce Clause Regulation, 1920-1937 by Barrett L. Anderson, Master of Science Utah State University, 2018 Major Professor: Dr. Robert Ross Department: Political Science Did interest groups influence the Supreme Court’s interpretation of federal economic regulatory authority under the Commerce Clause leading up to the Supreme Court’s 1937 reversal? Recent scholarship has begun a renewed study of this tumultuous era seeking alternative explanations for the Court’s behavior beyond the conventional explanations concerning Roosevelt’s court packing plan.
    [Show full text]
  • N50-1936-The-Truth-About-Liberty
    el~ .li.LIO X"IK>li. MaN li.VM<IVOllll 66~ s.ta'IlldWVd: 'IVNOILVNll:il.LNI THE TRUTH ABOUT THE LIBERTY LEAGUE BY GRACE HUTCHINS IF YOU were listening in on the radio one Saturday night not long ago, you may have heard Jouett Shouse, former chairman of the Democratic National Committee, now president of the American Liberty League. On a nationwide hook-up he described the kind of man Wall Street wants as the next President of the United States: "A man of prudent caution, of hard-headed business sense, of inflexible will and determination is needed for the job." Does Alf Mossman Landon, Governor of Kansas and Republican candidate for President of the United States, fit this description? Is he the kind of man the American Liberty League wants in the White House? That is one of the questions we shall seek to an­ swer in- the following pages. And what is this Liberty League that claims to be "non-parti­ san"-whose members are supporting Landon and the Republican Party in the 1936 election campaign? What is this organization that claims to speak in the name of "American Liberty"-two words that mean a great deal to all true Americans? Why is it so much concerned about "liberty"? Liberty for whom? What Is tke Liberty League? At the expensive Union League Club, corner of Park Avenue and 37th Street, New York City, a private meeting was held one day in the Summer of 1934. John J. Raskob, vice-president of E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 'and director of the du Pont­ Morgan General Motors Corp., and other representatives of du 3 Pont munitions were present at this meeting to form the American Liberty League, which was incorporated on August 15, 1934.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republican Right Since 1945
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge American Politics Political Science 1983 The Republican Right since 1945 David W. Reinhard Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Thanks to the University of Kentucky Libraries and the University Press of Kentucky, this book is freely available to current faculty, students, and staff at the University of Kentucky. Find other University of Kentucky Books at uknowledge.uky.edu/upk. For more information, please contact UKnowledge at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Reinhard, David W., "The Republican Right since 1945" (1983). American Politics. 24. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_political_science_american_politics/24 Right SINCE 1945 David W. Reinhard THE UNIVERSITY PRESS OF KENTUCKY Coypright© 1983 by The University Press of Kentucky Scholarly publisher for the Commonwealth, serving Bellarmine College, Berea College, Centre College of Kentucky, Eastern Kentucky University, The Filson Club, Georgetown College, Kentucky Historical Society, Kentucky State University, Morehead State University, Murray State University, Northern Kentucky University, Transylvania University, University of Kentucky, University of louisville, and Western Kentucky University. Editorial and Sales Offices: Lexington, Kentucky 40506-0024 ISBN: 978-0-8131-5449-7 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Reinhard, David W., 1952- The Republican Right since 1945. Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Republican Party (U.S.) 2. Conservatism-United States-Histoty-20th century. 3. United States-Politics and government-1945- I. Title. JK2356.R28 1983 324.2734 82-40460 Contents Preface v 1. If Roosevelt Lives Forever 1 2. A Titanic Ballot-Box Uprising 15 3. The Philadelphia Story 37 4. ANewSetofGuts 54 5. If the Elephant Remembers 75 6.
    [Show full text]
  • A Progressive Creed: the Experimental Federalism of Justice Brandeis
    Yale Law & Policy Review Volume 2, Number 1, Fall 1983 Article A Progressive Creed: The Experimental Federalism of Justice Brandeis E. E. Steiner* It is one of the happy incidents of thefederal system that a single courageous state may, if its citizens choose, serve as a laboraory and /ry novel social and economic experi- ments without risk to the rest of the coun/r. t As Alexander Bickel predicted in 1970,' the doctrine of experimental 3 federalism 2 espoused by Justice Brandeis in New Slate Ice Co. v. Leibmann is exhibiting new vigor throughout the American legal community. Ci- tations to this famous dissent are no longer confined to U.S. Supreme Court dissents, as they were during the Warren Court era. 4 Instead, * Associate, Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, Cincinnati, Ohio. B.A. University of Virginia, M.A. Johns Hopkins University, J.D. Yale University. The author would like to thank Jan G. Deutsch, David Spring, Eugene Illovsky, Rajesh Garg, R.A. Mason, A. Blair Dorminey and Jose Berrocal for advice in preparing earlier drafts of this article and Robin Tucker for assistance in preparing the manuscript. t New State Ice Co. v. Leibmann, 285 U.S. 262, 311 (1932) (Brandeis, J., dissenting). 1. A. BICKEL, THE SUPREME COURT AND THE IDEA OF PROGRESS 116 (1970) ("There is in being a reaction to the steady unification and nationalization of recent years, a movement toward a decentralization and a diversity of which the as yet unacknowledged prophet-due, I should suppose, for a revival-is Brandeis."). 2. This term is borrowed from Wilkinson,]ustireJohnM.
    [Show full text]
  • The Switch in Time That Saved Nine: a Study of Justice Owen Roberts's Vote in West Coast Hotel Co
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons CUREJ - College Undergraduate Research Electronic Journal College of Arts and Sciences 2012 The Switch In Time That Saved Nine: A Study of Justice Owen Roberts's Vote in West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish Brian T. Goldman Student, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/curej Part of the American Politics Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Political History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Goldman, Brian T., "The Switch In Time That Saved Nine: A Study of Justice Owen Roberts's Vote in West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish" 01 January 2012. CUREJ: College Undergraduate Research Electronic Journal, University of Pennsylvania, https://repository.upenn.edu/curej/150. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/curej/150 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Switch In Time That Saved Nine: A Study of Justice Owen Roberts's Vote in West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish Abstract During President Roosevelt's first term in office (1932-1936) the Supreme Court ruled several landmark New Deal measures unconstitutional; a handful of these decisions were by 5-4 margins. It all changed in 1937, when swing Justice Owen Roberts voted to affirm a minimum wage statute in West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish; a year earlier he had voted against minimum wage legislation in a similar case. This "switch in time that saved nine" has no established consensus that explains its occurrence. Some have posited that President Roosevelt's "court packing" legislation forced Roberts's hand, while other have argued that public opinion caused Roberts's swing in jurisprudence.
    [Show full text]