Lingua Franca, Ca

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lingua Franca, Ca Mediterranean lingua franca, ca. 1450-1650: Threshold or holdover? Karla Mallette Professor of Italian and Middle East Studies University of Michigan • The research question • Lingua franca: definition and structure • Evidence • Negative evidence • Afterlife Image: 15th century Genoese portolan Pre-modern Mediterranean trade routes: • Trans-Mediterranean routes • Cabotage (along the coast) How did travelers on these trade routes communicate? Cabotage: navigation in coastal waters French cabotage, Spanish cabotaje, Italian cabotaggio From northern French nautical terminology Image: ceiling of S. Giacomo dall’Orio, Venice; roof dates to the 14th century Crews and passengers on Mediterranean ships came from ports throughout the Mediterranean. How did they communicate? Enrica Salvatori, “Corsairs’ Crews and Cross- Cultural Interactions: The Case of the Pisan Trapelicinus in the Twelfth Century.” Medieval Encounters 13 (2007) 32-55. “In 1596, a group of caulkers and carpenters working on a Venetian merchant ship in Istanbul included Slavs, Messinese, Genoese, Neapolitans, French, Romans, Greeks, Germans, Puglians, Corsicans, Portuguese, Spaniards, Venetians, Rhodiots and six Muslims of unspecified provenance.” Eric Dursteler, “Speaking in Tongues” 59 Image: man overboard! Lancelot cycle in French, copied in Venice ca. 1300 The crusades brought western Europeans to the Holy Land between ca. 1100-1250. How did they communicate with each other and with locals in the eastern Mediterranean? Credo “according to the Latin and Greek tongues” (first half of the 13th century) I believe / in one God / father / omnipotent / creator / of heaven and earth / and which are seen / of all / and not seen M. Egger, “Mémoire sur un document inédit pour servir à l’histoire des langues romanes.” Mémoires de l’Institut de France 21 (1857): 349-76. Pilgrims – both Muslim and Christian – traveled across the late medieval and early modern Mediterranean to reach the Holy Land (Jerusalem for Christians, Mecca for Muslims). How did they communicate with ship’s crews and with locals on their voyages? Image: the travels of Ibn Jubayr, 1183-85 Between the 16th-18th centuries, the bagnios (prisons) of the Barbary regencies held a population of Christian prisoners, either as slaves or as captives for ransom. How did prisoners and captors communicate? Image: the Barbary regencies John Wansbrough: Lingua franca in the Mediterranean Richmond (Surrey): Curzon Press, 1996. “A Mamluk Letter of 877/1473.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 24 (1961): 200-213. “A Moroccan Amīr’s Commercial Treaty with Venice of the Year 913/1508.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 25 (1962): 449-71. “Venice and Florence in the Mamluk Commercial Privileges.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 28 (1965): 483-523. “A Judaeo-Arabic Document from Sicily.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 30 (1967): 305-313. “Diplomatica Siciliana.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 47 (1984): 10-21. “Sic enim est traditum.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 51 (1988): 203-213. • The research question • Lingua franca: definition and structure • Evidence • Negative evidence • Afterlife Image: 15th century Genoese portolan The lingua franca was used by populations who came into contact with each other and had to communicate with each other over the longue durée • Longue durée > the Annales school, Braudel • Opposed to histoire événementielle • Focuses on long-term and/or habitually repeated historical dynamics: e.g. not the thoughts and actions of princes but the cycles and rhythms of Mediterranean life Image: Venice (from the Kitab-i Bahriye, or Book of the Sea, by Piri Reis; early 16th century) EVERYTHING YOU EVER NEED TO KNOW ABOUT MEDITERRANEAN STUDIES: Connectivity (Horden & Purcell) or routes et villes (Braudel) or orbits (Wansbrough) + the longue durée (Annales school) = the Mediterranean When places that are distinct and self-identical are put into contact with places that are physically distant and also distinct and self-identical, and that contact is constant but sporadic over a long period of time, a unique historical dynamic emerges. But – is it unique to the Mediterranean? The lingua franca was used by populations who came into contact with each other and had to communicate with each other over the longue durée: • corsairs and other sailors • captives in the bagnios of the Barbary regencies • honest merchants and traders • Christian pilgrims to the Holy Land • dragomans (or interpreters) Image: Venice (from the Kitab-i Bahriye, or Book of the Sea, by Piri Reis; early 16th century) Lingua franca > Latin Franci ? Lingua franca > Byzantine phrangoi > Latin Franci ? Lingua franca > Arabic ifranj > Byzantine phrangoi > Latin Franci ? Lingua franca > Romance franco > Arabic ifranj > Byzantine phrangoi > Latin Franci ? Lingua franca > Romance franco > Arabic ifranj > Byzantine phrangoi > Latin Franci ? Definition of franco: Western Christian – from the perspective of someone from the eastern Mediterranean Structure of the lingua franca: • Simplified Italian/Romance • Vocabulary from other languages, especially Greek and Arabic • Pidginization strategies: • Use of the infinitive rather than conjugated verbs • Simplified nouns: no distinction between singular and plural or between masculine and feminine • Simple, rudimentary vocabulary • Subject to relexification: Italian vocabulary (more common in the eastern Mediterranean) could be swapped out for Spanish vocabulary (in the western Mediterranean) Veccio, veccio, niçarane Christiano ven aca, porque tener aqui tortuga? qui portata de campaña? gran vellaco estar, qui ha portato. Anda presto piglia, porta fora, guarda diablo, portar a la campaña, questo si tener en casa, estar grande pecato. Mira no trovar mi altra volta, sino a fee de Dio, mi parlar patron donar bona bastonada, mucho mucho. Antonio de Sosa, Topographia e historia general de Argel (1612) Veccio, veccio, niçarane Christiano ven aca, porque tener aqui tortuga? qui portata de campaña? gran vellaco estar, qui ha portato. Anda presto piglia, porta fora, guarda diablo, portar a la campaña, questo si tener en casa, estar grande pecato. Mira no trovar mi altra volta, sino a fee de Dio, mi parlar patron donar bona bastonada, mucho mucho. Old man, old man, Christian (nasrani), Christian (Christiano), come here, why are you holding that turtle? Who brought it from the field? He’s a big scoundrel, the one who brought it. Go, quickly, pick it up, take it outside, for goodness’ sake, take it to the field, if you keep it in the house it’s a great sin. See that I don’t find it another time, if so – by God – I’ll speak to the boss, who will give you a good thrashing, an awful lot. Cifoletti, La lingua franca barbaresca (Rome, 2004); reprint of Dictionnaire de la langue franque ou petit mauresque (Marseille 1830) From the Concise Oxford Dictionary of Linguistics: lingua franca: Any language used for communication between groups who have no other language in common: e.g. Swahili in much of East and Central Africa where it is not native. Cf. langue véhiculaire, also pidgin; in reference to Africa, in particular, these categories are not always easily distinguished langue véhiculaire: French term for a language used in communication between members of societies whose own languages are different: e.g. French itself in much of West and Central Africa Image: Pier Francesco Mola, “Barbary Pirate” (1650) From the Concise Oxford Dictionary of Linguistics: pidgin: A simplified form of speech developed as a medium of trade, or through other extended but limited contact, between groups of speakers who have no other language in common: e.g. the simplified forms of English, French, or Dutch which are assumed to be the origin of creoles in the West Indies. Distinguished in principle at least from less established forms of similar origin, sometimes described as ‘jargons’ or ‘pre-pidgins’ From the Concise Oxford Dictionary of Linguistics: creole: Defined, in classic treatments, as a language that has developed historically from a pidgin. In theory, accordingly, a pidgin develops from trade or other contacts; it has no native speakers, its range of use is limited, and its structure is simplified. Later it becomes the only form of speech that is common to a community; it is learned by new speakers and used for all purposes; its structure and vocabulary are enlarged; and so on. Thence, more generally, of any form of speech perceived as having structural features similar to those of pidgins, or of forms traditionally described as ‘creoles’, or known to have arisen historically over a characteristically short period; whether or not development from a pidgin is posited or can be demonstrated. E.g. Middle English was a creole, under a sufficiently loose definition. The lingua franca only existed as a spoken language: it never creolized (it was no one’s mother tongue and never became a written language). • The research question • Lingua franca: definition and structure • Evidence • Negative evidence • Afterlife Image: 15th century Genoese portolan The galley, used by the Barbary My research strategy: and Maltese corsairs • Following the trail of those who wrote about the lingua franca • Digital resources • Looking for language The xebec, used by the Sallee rovers Earliest sources that describe the lingua franca: Algiers: Antonio de Sosa, Topographia e historia general de Argel (1612): “La tercera lengua que
Recommended publications
  • A Proposal for Conversational Questionnaires Alexandre François
    A proposal for conversational questionnaires Alexandre François To cite this version: Alexandre François. A proposal for conversational questionnaires. Aimée Lahaussois; Marine Vuiller- met. Methodological Tools for Linguistic Description and Typology, 16, pp.155-196, 2019, Language Documentation & Conservation Special Publications, 978-0-9973295-5-1. hal-02061237 HAL Id: hal-02061237 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02061237 Submitted on 7 Mar 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - ShareAlike| 4.0 International License Methodological Tools for Linguistic Description and Typology edited by Aimée Lahaussois Marine Vuillermet Language Documentation & Conservation Special Publication No. 16 Table of Contents 1. Introduction: Methodological tools for linguistic description and typology Aimée Lahaussois & Marine Vuillermet ................................................................ 1 2. Linguistic diversity, language documentation and psycholinguistics: The role
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship of Nigerian English and Nigerian Pidgin in Nigeria: Evidence from Copula Constructions in Ice-Nigeria
    journal of language contact 13 (2020) 351-388 brill.com/jlc The Relationship of Nigerian English and Nigerian Pidgin in Nigeria: Evidence from Copula Constructions in Ice-Nigeria Ogechi Florence Agbo Ph.D student, Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany [email protected] Ingo Plag Professor of English Language and Linguistics Faculty of Arts and Humani- ties, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany [email protected] Abstract Deuber (2006) investigated variation in spoken Nigerian Pidgin data by educated speakers and found no evidence for a continuum of lects between Nigerian Pidgin and English. Many speakers, however, speak both languages, and both are in close contact with each other, which keeps the question of the nature of their relationship on the agenda. This paper investigates 67 conversations in Nigerian English by educated speakers as they occur in the International Corpus of English, Nigeria (ice-Nigeria, Wunder et al., 2010), using the variability in copula usage as a test bed. Implicational scaling, network analysis and hierarchical cluster analysis reveal that the use of vari- ants is not randomly distributed over speakers. Particular clusters of speakers use par- ticular constellations of variants. A qualitative investigation reveals this complex situ- ation as a continuum of style, with code-switching as one of the stylistic devices, motivated by such social factors as formality, setting, participants and interpersonal relationships. Keywords Nigerian Pidgin – Nigerian English – code-switching – style-shifting – implicational scaling – network analysis – cluster analysis © Ogechi Agbo and Ingo Plag, 2020 | doi:10.1163/19552629-bja10023 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the prevailing cc-by-nc License at the time of Downloaded from Brill.com09/29/2021 10:21:27AM publication.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dialectal Shared Linguistic Features of the Diverse Arabic Dialects Resulting a Lingua Franca
    International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN: 2319-7064 ResearchGate Impact Factor (2018): 0.28 | SJIF (2018): 7.426 The Dialectal Shared Linguistic Features of the Diverse Arabic Dialects Resulting a Lingua Franca Dialect of Arabic Ameer Ali Hussein Al Majtoomy Lecturer M.A. linguistics in University of Kufa, Najaf, Iraq Abstract: Arabic is a very morphologically rich Semitic language so it has several dialects across the Arab homeland, the paper focuses on the similarities and differences between the Arabic dialects. The research tries to find out the most shares features among the Arabic dialects and decide a dialect a lingua franca of Arabic language to be used and taught as for learners of Arabic. This lingua franca dialect could be used outside the Arabic countries. Keywords: MSA, dialect, lingua franca, Levantine dialect, Gulf dialect, Maghreb dialect 1. Introduction 3. Aims of the study This topic addressed a very important phenomenon in This study aims: western society where immigrants of different Arabic 1) To identify the shared linguistic features according to the dialects can communicate easily in spite of the difference phonological,morphological, syntactic, and semantic between those dialects. The main problem of this project is levels. to shed the light on the similarities between the Arabic 2) To know how the similarities or shared features help the dialects which make it possible for those speakers speakers of Diverse Arabic dialects to understand each understand each other. The second question is how these other. diverse dialects make a speech Arabic community in the 3) To decide whether these diverse dialects of Arabic western society, is it because of the syntactic, semantic and compose a speech community.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Pidgin English on the Effective Learning of English Language Among Junior Secondary School Students in Port Harcourt
    International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 9 • No. 6 • June 2019 doi:10.30845/ijhss.v9n6p10 Impact of Pidgin English on the Effective Learning of English Language among Junior Secondary School Students in Port Harcourt Obisike Iheanyi Osondu Ph.D. School Of Foundation Studies Rivers State College of Health Science & Technology Port Harcourt, Nigeria Nwala Michael Alozie Ph.D Department Of English Studies University of Port Harcourt Choba, Port Harcourt, Nigeria Mbong Joy Etaruwak Faculty of Education National Open University of Nigeria Abuja, Nigeria Abstract This study investigated mother tongue interference among junior secondary school students in Port Harcourt Local Government Area of Rivers State, Nigeria where Pidgin English is mostly used in communication and serves as the L1. It focused on “transfer of rules” errors. The study adopted a quantitative research design with a sample size of 120 students randomly selected from four schools in the study area. The questionnaire was used as the instrument for data collection. Frequencies, percentages and mean scores were used to analyse the data. Any item that scores above 50% was considered valid. The major findings show that the students had “Transfer of Rules” Error on Phonology; they had 54.4% incorrect responses on the realization of /θ/ and /z/. The respondents also had difficulty in the correct usage of the morpheme “er” in generating words; they had an overall mean score of 60.4% under incorrect responses. The study therefore recommended adequate and constant practice so as to overcome negative mother tongue transfer. Keywords: Pidgin English, mother tongue, target language, interference, language, communication, interaction; deviation 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Creole and Pidgin Languages
    Author's personal copy Provided for non-commercial research and educational use only. Not for reproduction, distribution or commercial use. This article was originally published in the International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition, published by Elsevier, and the attached copy is provided by Elsevier for the author’s benefit and for the benefit of the author’s institution, for non-commercial research and educational use including without limitation use in instruction at your institution, sending it to specific colleagues who you know, and providing a copy to your institution’s administrator. All other uses, reproduction and distribution, including without limitation commercial reprints, selling or licensing copies or access, or posting on open internet sites, your personal or institution’s website or repository, are prohibited. For exceptions, permission may be sought for such use through Elsevier’s permissions site at: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissionusematerial From Mufwene, S.S., 2015. Pidgin and Creole Languages. In: James D. Wright (editor-in-chief), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition, Vol 18. Oxford: Elsevier. pp. 133–145. ISBN: 9780080970868 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. unless otherwise stated. All rights reserved. Elsevier Author's personal copy Pidgin and Creole Languages Salikoko S Mufwene, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA Ó 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Abstract The study of creoles and pidgins has been marked by controversy about how they emerged, whether they can be identified by their structural features, and how they stand genetically in relation to their lexifiers. There have also been disagreements about what contact-induced varieties count as creoles, whether expanded pidgins should be lumped together with them, otherwise what distinguishes both kinds of vernaculars from each other, and how other contact-induced language varieties can be distinguished from all the above.
    [Show full text]
  • Italian-Spanish Contact in Early 20Th Century Argentina
    Ennis, Juan Antonio Italian-Spanish Contact in Early 20th Century Argentina Journal of language contact 2015, vol. 8, nro. 1, p. 112-145 Ennis, J. (2015). Italian-Spanish Contact in Early 20th Century Argentina. Journal of language contact, 8 (1), 112-145. En Memoria Académica. Disponible en: http://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.9987/pr.9987.pdf Información adicional en www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ journal of language contact 8 (2015) 112-145 brill.com/jlc Italian-Spanish Contact in Early 20th Century Argentina Juan Antonio Ennis conicet/Universidad de La Plata [email protected] Abstract This article attempts to provide a general approach to the exceptional language contact situation that took place in Argentina from the end of the 19th century until the first decades of the 20th century, in which an enormous immigration flow drastically modified the sociolinguistic landscape. This was most evident in urban environments—and among them especially the Buenos Aires area—and led the local ruling elites to set up a complex and massive apparatus for the nationalisation of the newcomers, which included a language shift in the first stage. Given that the majority of immigrants came from Italy, the most widespread form of contact was that between the local varieties of Spanish and the Italian dialects spoken by the immigrants, which led to the creation of a contact variety called Cocoliche that arose, lived then perished. Although this contact variety did not survive the early years, at least not as a full- fledged variety, the history of its emergence and the ways in which it can be studied today nevertheless make it an object of special interest for research perspectives ori- ented around the question of the early years of language contact.
    [Show full text]
  • The International Status of Kiswahili: the Parameters of Braj Kachru's
    The International Status of Kiswahili: The Parameters of Braj Kachru’s Model of World Englishes by Patrick Lugwiri Okombo, MA [email protected] Nairobi, Kenya & Edwin Muna, MA [email protected] Nairobi, Kenya Abstract This paper critically examines the status of Kiswahili as an international language within the parameters of Braj Kachru’s sociolinguistic construct – “Model of World Englishes”, that works to analyze how sociolinguistic histories, multicultural backgrounds and contexts of function influence the use of English in different regions of the world. In our view, such a model yields fairly objective results. Thus, the results of this paper are that Kiswahili perfectly meets the standards of an international language within Braj Kachru’s model, albeit with few disparities. The paper concludes that Kiswahili’s growth into an international language is clearly taking the trends taken by English as examined by Kachru. Hence, the findings reinforce Kiswahili’s geo- political significance as it recommends the creation of conditions that would encourage its spread and influence in the world. Key words: Kiswahili, international language, world Englishes, native speaker 55 Africology: The Journal of Pan African Studies, vol.10, no.7, September 2017 Introduction Kiswahili is an indigenous African language whose origin, according to many researchers, is the coast of Eastern Africa. Traditionally, it was regarded as the language of the coastal communities of Kenya and Tanzania. It remained the language of the people of East African coast for a long time. It is argued that the early visitors and traders, such as the Arabs and Persians who came to the East African coast, used to speak with the natives in Kiswahili.
    [Show full text]
  • Authoritarianism and Democracy in Muslim Countries: Rentier States and Regional Diffusion
    Authoritarianism and Democracy in Muslim Countries: Rentier States and Regional Diffusion AHMET T. KURU ACCORDING TO FREEDOM HOUSE (2013),1 among countries with populations higher than 200,000, the proportion of electoral democracies is 56 percent (98/174) worldwide, whereas it is only 20 percent (10/49) in Muslim‐majority countries. The average Freedom House score (1 for most and 7 for least democratic) for all countries (3.5) is also better than the average score for Muslim‐majority countries (5.1). Analyzing countries with populations over 500,000, Polity (2010) reaches a similar result: 57 percent (93/164) of all countries and 28 percent (13/47) of Muslim‐majority countries are democracies.2 Why is the rate (and score) of democracy disproportionately low among Muslim‐majority countries? This article argues that the combined effects of rentier states and regional diffusion provide the best explanation. The rentier state model explains the links between the rent revenue, limited taxation, and authoritarianism. A state becomes “rentier” if oil, gas, and mineral rents constitute over 40 percent of its revenues. The state 1Freedom House, “Freedom in the World 2013,” accessed at http://www.freedomhouse.org/sites/default/ files/FIW%202013%20Booklet.pdf, 1 October 2013. 2Polity IV, “Country Reports 2010,” accessed at http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity06.htm, 1 Jan- uary 2012. AHMET T. KURU is an associate professor of political science at San Diego State University. He is the author of the award‐winning Secularism and State Policies toward Religion: The United States, France, and Turkey, and the co‐editor (with Alfred Stepan) of Democracy, Islam, and Secularism in Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • In Praise of Fluffy Bunnies
    In Praise of Fluffy Bunnies Copyright © 2012, Richard Forsyth. Background Reading John Lanchester's Whoops!, an entertaining account of how highly paid hotshot traders in a number of prestigious financial institutions brought the world to the brink of economic collapse, I was struck by the following sentence: "In an ideal world, one populated by vegetarians, Esperanto speakers and fluffy bunny wabbits, derivatives would be used for one thing only: reducing levels of risk." (Lanchester, 2010: 37). What struck me about this throwaway remark, apart from the obvious implication that derivatives were actually used to magnify risk rather than reducing it (doubtless by carnivores ignorant of Esperanto), was its presumption that right-thinking readers would take it for granted that Esperanto symbolizes well-meaning futility -- thus highlighting the author's status as a tough-minded realist. This is just one illustration that disdain for Esperanto in particular, and auxiliary languages in general, pervades intellectual circles in Britain today, as in many other countries. And if you dare to raise the subject of constructed international languages with a professional translator or interpreter be prepared not just for disdain but outright hostility. Of course professional interpreters are among the most linguistically gifted people on the planet, and can't see why the rest of us shouldn't become fluent in half a dozen natural languages in our spare time. (Not to mention the fact that a widespread adoption of Esperanto, or one of its competitors, would have a seriously negative impact on their opportunities for gainful employment.) Thus Esperanto has become a symbol of lost causes, to be dismissed out of hand by practical folk.
    [Show full text]
  • Mutual Intelligibility and Slavic Constructed Interlanguages : a Comparative Study of Ruski Jezik and ​ ​ Interslavic
    Mutual intelligibility and Slavic constructed interlanguages : a comparative study of Ruski Jezik and ​ ​ Interslavic ** Jade JOANNOT M.A Thesis in Linguistics Leiden university 2020-2021 Supervisor : Tijmen Pronk TABLE OF CONTENTS Jade Joannot M.A Thesis Linguistics 24131 words 1.1. Abstract 1.2. Definitions 1.2.1. Constructed languages 1.2.2. Interlanguage 1.2.3. Mutual intelligibility 1.3. Object of study 1.3.1. History of Slavic constructed languages Pan-Slavic languages (19th century) Esperanto-inspired projects Contemporary projects 1.3.2. Ruski Jezik & Interslavic Ruski Jezik (17th century) Interslavic (21th century) 1.3.3. Shared aspects of Ruski Jezik and Interslavic 1.4. Relevance of the study 1.4.1. Constructed languages and mutual intelligibility 1.4.2. Comparative study of Ruski Jezik and Interslavic 1.4.3. Historical linguistics 1.5. Structure of the thesis 1.5.1. Research question 1.8. Description of the method 1.8.1. Part 1 : Approaches to Slavic mutual intelligibility and their conclusions 1.8.2. Part 2 : Study of Ruski Jezik and Interslavic I.1. Factors of mutual intelligibility I.1.1. Extra-linguistic factors I.1.2. Linguistic predictors of mutual intelligibility I.1.2.1. Lexical distance I.1.2.2. Phonological distance I.1.2.3. Morphosyntactic distance I.1.2.3.1. Methods of measurements I.1.2.3.2. The importance of morphosyntax I.1.3. Conclusions I.2. Mutual intelligibility in the Slavic area I.2.1. Degree of mutual intelligibility of Slavic languages I.2.2. The case of Bulgarian 2 Jade Joannot M.A Thesis Linguistics 24131 words I.2.3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Study of Pidgin and Creole Languages
    r The study of pidgin and creole lenguages PiererMuysken and Norval Smith r.r Introduction This book is concernedwith pidgin and creolelanguages. This statementmight well give the impressionthat we know preciselywhat is meant by theseterms. In fact they arethe subjectofmuch debate.Creolists agree neither about the precisedefinition ofthe terms pidgin and creole,nor abour the statuso[a number oflanguagesthat havebeen claimed to be pidginsor creoles,Mixed languages,introduced in chapter4, havegenerally not been mentionedat all. To turn first to pidgin languages,it is generallyagreed that in essencethese represent speech-formswhichdo nothavenative speakers, and are therefore primarily usedas a means of communication among pcoplewho do not sharea common language.The degreeof developmentand sophisticationattained by sucha pidgin dependson the qpe and intensiry of communicativeinteraction among the i$ users.Miihlhiusler (r986) makesthree basic distinctionsamongst speech-forms that crcolistshave referred to aspidgins - (ratherun- stable)jargons, stablepidgins, and expandedpidgins (seefurther chapter3). To turn to creolelalguages (or just creoles),one vital differencefrom pidgins is that pidginsdo not havenativespeakers, while creolesdo. This is not alwaysan easydistinction to make,as one aspectof theworldwideincrease in linguisticconformiry and the concomi- tanrreducdon in linguisticdiversity, is that extendedpidgins are beginning to acquirenative speakers.This has happenedfor instancewith Tok Pisin, Nigerian Pidgin English, and Sango(Central
    [Show full text]
  • Language and Country List
    CONTENT LANGUAGE & COUNTRY LIST Languages by countries World map (source: United States. United Nations. [ online] no dated. [cited July 2007] Available from: www.un.org/Depts/Cartographic/english/htmain.htm) Multicultural Clinical Support Resource Language & country list Country Languages (official/national languages in bold) Country Languages (official/national languages in bold) Afghanistan Dari, Pashto, Parsi-Dari, Tatar, Farsi, Hazaragi Brunei Malay, English, Chinese, other minority languages Albania Tosk, Albanian Bulgaria Bulgarian, Turkish, Roma and other minority languages Algeria Arabic, French, Berber dialects Burkina Faso French, native African (Sudanic) languages 90% Andorra Catalán, French, Spanish, Portuguese Burundi Kirundi, French, Swahili, Rwanda Angola Portuguese, Koongo, Mbundu, Chokwe, Mbunda, Cambodia Khmer, French, English Antigua and English, local dialects, Arabic, Portuguese Cameroon French, English, 24 African language groups Barbuda Canada English, French, other minority languages Argentina Spanish, English, Italian, German, French Cape Verde Portuguese, Kabuverdianu, Criuolo Armenia Armenian, Yezidi, Russian Central French (official), Sangho (lingua franca, national), other minority Australia English, Indigenous and other minority languages African languages Austria German, Slovenian, Croatian, Hungarian, Republic Alemannisch, Bavarian, Sinte Romani, Walser Chad French, Arabic, Sara, more than 120 languages and dialects Azerbaijan Azerbaijani (Azeri), Russian, Armenian, other and minority languages Chile
    [Show full text]