SABINE PARISH HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN I

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SABINE PARISH HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN I SABINE PARISH HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN i SABINE PARISH HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN ii ***This Page Left Intentionally Blank*** SABINE PARISH HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN iii SABINE PARISH HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE Prepared for: Sabine Parish Prepared by: Stephenson Disaster Management Institute Ms. Lauren Stevens Mr. Chris Rippetoe Mr. Joseph Harris Mr. Brant Mitchell Mr. Stuart Nolan Louisiana State University - Business Education Complex Baton Rouge, LA 70803 DATE GOES HERE SABINE PARISH HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN iv ***This Page Left Intentionally Blank*** SABINE PARISH HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This 2016 Sabine Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update was coordinated by the Sabine Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Steering Committee, in collaboration with the participating jurisdictions as well as community stakeholders and the general public. The participating jurisdictions are made up of the following communities: Unincorporated Sabine Parish Village of Converse Village of Fisher Village of Florien Town of Many Village of Noble Village of Pleasant Hill Town of Zwolle Special thanks is directed to all of those who assisted in contributing feedback and expertise on this document, especially the Sabine Parish Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Management. These combined efforts have made this project possible. The Sabine Parish Steering Committee consists of the following individuals, who are credited in the creation of this document: Kenneth Freeman Mayor of Many Town of Many G.J. Martinez Mayor of Zwolle Town of Zwolle Troy H. Terrell Mayor of Converse Village of Converse Susan Slay Mayor of Fisher Village of Fisher Eddie Jones, Jr. Mayor of Florien Village of Florien Gary Rivers Mayor of Noble Village of Noble Bill Thomas Mayor of Pleasant Hill Village of Pleasant Hill David Davis OHSEP Director Sabine Parish OHSEP Kenneth Moore OHSEP Director Vernon Parish OHSEP Teresa Basco GOHSEP Region 6 Coordinator GOHSEP Keneth Ebarb Police Jury President Sabine Parish Police Jury The 2016 Sabine Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update was written by the Stephenson Disaster Management Institute, Louisiana State University. Further comments should be directed to the Sabine Parish Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness: 1756 San Antonio Ave., Many, LA, 71449. SABINE PARISH HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN vi Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1-1 Location, Demography, and Economy........................................................................................................ 1-2 Location .................................................................................................................................................. 1-2 Economy ................................................................................................................................................. 1-3 Hazard Mitigation ....................................................................................................................................... 1-4 General Strategy ......................................................................................................................................... 1-6 2016 Plan Update ....................................................................................................................................... 1-6 2. Hazard Identification and Parish-Wide Risk Assessment ....................................................................... 2-1 Prevalent Hazards to the Community ........................................................................................................ 2-1 Previous Occurrences ................................................................................................................................. 2-3 Probability of Future Hazard Events ........................................................................................................... 2-3 Inventory of Assets for the Entire Parish .................................................................................................... 2-4 Essential Facilities of the Parish.................................................................................................................. 2-6 Future Development Trends .................................................................................................................... 2-11 Future Hazard Impacts ............................................................................................................................. 2-13 Land Use ................................................................................................................................................... 2-13 Hazard Identification ................................................................................................................................ 2-15 Drought ................................................................................................................................................. 2-15 Flooding ................................................................................................................................................ 2-18 Thunderstorms ..................................................................................................................................... 2-41 Tornadoes ............................................................................................................................................. 2-52 Tropical Cyclones .................................................................................................................................. 2-59 Wildfires ............................................................................................................................................... 2-75 Winter Storms ...................................................................................................................................... 2-92 Dam Failure........................................................................................................................................... 2-97 3. Capability Assessment ............................................................................................................................ 3-1 Policies, Plans, and Programs ..................................................................................................................... 3-1 Building Codes, Permitting, Land Use Planning and Ordinances ........................................................... 3-2 Administration, Technical, and Financial.................................................................................................... 3-3 Education and Outreach ............................................................................................................................. 3-4 Flood Insurance and Community Rating System ........................................................................................ 3-5 NFIP Worksheets ........................................................................................................................................ 3-8 4. Mitigation Strategy ................................................................................................................................. 4-1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 4-1 Goals ........................................................................................................................................................... 4-1 SABINE PARISH HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN vii 2016 Mitigation Actions and Update on Previous Plan Actions ................................................................. 4-2 Sabine Parish 2011 Hazard Mitigation Action Update ........................................................................... 4-3 Unincorporated Sabine New Mitigation Actions .................................................................................. 4-11 Village of Converse - New Mitigation Actions ...................................................................................... 4-13 Village of Fisher – New Mitigation Actions........................................................................................... 4-15 Village of Florien – New Mitigation Actions ......................................................................................... 4-17 Town of Many – New Mitigation Actions ............................................................................................. 4-19 Village of Noble – New Mitigation Actions ........................................................................................... 4-21 Village of Pleasant Hill – New Mitigation Actions ................................................................................ 4-23 Town of Zwolle – New Mitigation Actions ........................................................................................... 4-25 Action Prioritization .................................................................................................................................. 4-27 Appendix A: Planning Process ........................................................................................................................ A-1 Purpose ....................................................................................................................................................... A-1 The Sabine
Recommended publications
  • List of Tables
    Louisiana MFP Accountability Report JUNE 2014 STATE BOARD OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION For further information, please contact: Mr. Charles E. Roemer Mr. Jay Guillot Allen Schulenberg President 5th BESE District Office of Administrative Support 6th BESE District Division of Information Technology Services Mr. James D. Garvey, Jr. Ms. Carolyn Hill Phone: 225.342.2292 Vice President 8th BESE District E-mail: [email protected] 1st BESE District Ms. Holly Boffy Ms. Jane Smith Secretary/Treasurer Member-at-Large This public document was printed at a cost of $48.51. Five (5) copies of this document were printed in this first printing at a cost of $48.51. This 7th BESE District document package was printed by the Louisiana Department of Education, Office of Administrative Support, Division of Information Technology Ms. Kira Orange Jones Dr. Judy Miranti Services; P.O. Box 94064; Baton Rouge, LA 70804-9064. This material was printed in accordance with the standards for printing by State Agencies 2nd BESE District Member-at-Large established pursuant to R.S. 43:31. Ms. Lottie P. Beebe Ms. Connie Bradford The mission of the Louisiana Department of Education (LDOE) is to ensure equal 3rd BESE District Member-at-Large access to education and to promote equal excellence throughout the state. The LDOE is committed to providing Equal Employment Opportunities and is committed to ensuring that all of its programs and facilities are accessible to all members of the public. The LDOE does not discriminate on the basis of age, color, disability, Mr. Walter Lee Ms. Heather Cope national origin, race, religion, sex, or genetic information.
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-08-1120 Disaster Recovery: Past Experiences Offer Insights For
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Committee on Homeland GAO Security and Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate September 2008 DISASTER RECOVERY Past Experiences Offer Insights for Recovering from Hurricanes Ike and Gustav and Other Recent Natural Disasters GAO-08-1120 September 2008 DISASTER RECOVERY Accountability Integrity Reliability Past Experiences Offer Insights for Recovering from Highlights Hurricanes Ike and Gustav and Other Recent Natural Highlights of GAO-08-1120, a report to the Disasters Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found This month, Hurricanes Ike and While the federal government provides significant financial assistance after Gustav struck the Gulf Coast major disasters, state and local governments play the lead role in disaster producing widespread damage and recovery. As affected jurisdictions recover from the recent hurricanes and leading to federal major disaster floods, experiences from past disasters can provide insights into potential declarations. Earlier this year, good practices. Drawing on experiences from six major disasters that heavy flooding resulted in similar declarations in seven Midwest occurred from 1989 to 2005, GAO identified the following selected insights: states. In response, federal agencies have provided millions of • Create a clear, implementable, and timely recovery plan. Effective dollars in assistance to help with recovery plans provide a road map for recovery. For example, within short- and long-term recovery. 6 months of the 1995 earthquake in Japan, the city of Kobe created a State and local governments bear recovery plan that identified detailed goals which facilitated coordination the primary responsibility for among recovery stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Area Contingency Plan 2020.1
    Southeast Texas and Southwest Louisiana Area Contingency Plan 2020.1 Southeast Texas and Southwest Louisiana Area Contingency Plan (SETX and SWLA ACP) 2020.1 SETX and SWLA ACP Commandant 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave United States Coast Guard Washington, DC 20593-7516 Staff Symbol: CG-MER Phone: (202) 372-2675 16471 08 Dec 2020 MEMORANDUM ALONSO.RICARDO. Digitally signed by ALONSO.RICARDO.MANUEL.1183 MANUEL.11834353 435376 76 Date: 2020.12.08 11:32:29 -05'00' From: R. M. Alonso, CAPT Reply to CG-MER COMDT (CG-MER) Attn of: Jonathan R. Smith Phone: (202) 372-2675 To: Distribution Digitally signed by GARR.JOHN.WITHNER.1164051451 GARR.JOHN.WITHNER.1164051451 Date: 2021.01.04 12:32:04 -05'00' Thru: CG LANTAREA (LANT-5) Subj: COAST GUARD NATIONAL REVIEW PANEL RESULTS FOR MARINE SAFETY UNIT PORT ARTHUR AREA CONTINGENCY PLAN Ref: (a) COMDT (CG-5RI) Memo 16471 of 28 Nov 2017 (b) U.S. Coast Guard Marine Environmental Response and Preparedness Manual, COMDTINST M16000.14 (c) COMDT (DCO) Memo 16471 of 02 Feb 2017 (d) National Contingency Plan, 40 CFR part 300 1. BACKGROUND. In accordance with reference (a), CG-MER launched a new Area Contingency Plan (ACP) review and approval process, which is now formally incorporated into reference (b). This new policy is a cornerstone product of the broader area contingency planning revitalization initiative outlined in reference (c). The focal points of this new policy are to promote formal standards for annual updates as well as institute a Coast Guard National Review Panel (CGNRP) that will address national consistency on a macro level and ensure our compliance with references (b) and (d).
    [Show full text]
  • Further Investigations Into the King George
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2010 Further investigations into the King George Island Mounds site (16LV22) Harry Gene Brignac Jr Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Brignac Jr, Harry Gene, "Further investigations into the King George Island Mounds site (16LV22)" (2010). LSU Master's Theses. 2720. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/2720 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FURTHER INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE KING GEORGE ISLAND MOUNDS SITE (16LV22) A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of Geography and Anthropology By Harry Gene Brignac Jr. B.A. Louisiana State University, 2003 May, 2010 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I would like to give thanks to God for surrounding me with the people in my life who have guided and supported me in this and all of my endeavors. I have to express my greatest appreciation to Dr. Rebecca Saunders for her professional guidance during this entire process, and for her inspiration and constant motivation for me to become the best archaeologist I can be.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane and Tropical Storm
    State of New Jersey 2014 Hazard Mitigation Plan Section 5. Risk Assessment 5.8 Hurricane and Tropical Storm 2014 Plan Update Changes The 2014 Plan Update includes tropical storms, hurricanes and storm surge in this hazard profile. In the 2011 HMP, storm surge was included in the flood hazard. The hazard profile has been significantly enhanced to include a detailed hazard description, location, extent, previous occurrences, probability of future occurrence, severity, warning time and secondary impacts. New and updated data and figures from ONJSC are incorporated. New and updated figures from other federal and state agencies are incorporated. Potential change in climate and its impacts on the flood hazard are discussed. The vulnerability assessment now directly follows the hazard profile. An exposure analysis of the population, general building stock, State-owned and leased buildings, critical facilities and infrastructure was conducted using best available SLOSH and storm surge data. Environmental impacts is a new subsection. 5.8.1 Profile Hazard Description A tropical cyclone is a rotating, organized system of clouds and thunderstorms that originates over tropical or sub-tropical waters and has a closed low-level circulation. Tropical depressions, tropical storms, and hurricanes are all considered tropical cyclones. These storms rotate counterclockwise in the northern hemisphere around the center and are accompanied by heavy rain and strong winds (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NOAA] 2013a). Almost all tropical storms and hurricanes in the Atlantic basin (which includes the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea) form between June 1 and November 30 (hurricane season). August and September are peak months for hurricane development.
    [Show full text]
  • US Energy Industry Response to Recent Hurricane Seasons
    Hardening and Resiliency U.S. Energy Industry Response to Recent Hurricane Seasons Infrastructure Security and Energy Restoration Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability U.S. Department of Energy August 2010 For Further Information This report was prepared by the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability under the direction of Patricia Hoffman, Assistant Secretary, and William Bryan, Deputy Assistant Secretary. Specific questions about information in this report may be directed to Alice Lippert, Senior Technical Advisor ([email protected]). Contributors include Mindi Farber-DeAnda, Matthew Cleaver, Carleen Lewandowski, and Kateri Young. Cover photo sources: Lineman photo: David H. Lewis/istockphoto.com Pipeline photo: Christian Lagereek/istockphoto.com Refinery photo: Erik de Graaf/istockphoto.com Mobile transformer photo: Deltastar, reproduced with permission. OE/ISER Final Report 8/16/10 i Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ v Background ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Focus of the Study .......................................................................................................................... 3 Aging Infrastructure and Hurricane Hazards .............................................................................. 5 Storm Surge and Flood Damage ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons Learned: Evacuations Management of Hurricane Gustav
    4th Symposium on Policy and Socio-Economic Research, American Meteorological Society, Phoenix, AZ, 2009. 2.5 LESSONS LEARNED: EVACUATIONS MANAGEMENT OF HURRICANE GUSTAV Gina M. Eosco1, Mark A. Shafer2, and Barry Keim3 1Department of Communications, University of Oklahoma 2Oklahoma Climatological Survey, University of Oklahoma 3 Department of Geography and Anthropology, Louisiana State University Experience is what you get when you don’t get what you want. The experience of Hurricane Katrina was not what anyone in New Orleans wanted, yet three years after New Orleans was struck by Hurricane Katrina, the city proved they were ready for the next big one. As the National Hurricane Center forecasts started indicating a possible category 3 or stronger hurricane heading towards Louisiana, the city began preparations for evacuation. Gulf coast residents responded with the largest evacuation in U.S. history. Given the contrast with Katrina, why was the response to Gustav so much better? It is true that government officials learned from Katrina, but Katrina was just one milestone along the way toward making New Orleans safer. This paper examines prior recent experience with hurricanes in Louisiana, events surrounding Hurricane Gustav, and Figure 1. Track of Hurricane Georges, September how we have learned from other disasters. Not only 20-27, 1998 (Image source: Unisys did Louisiana officials learn from prior hurricanes, http://weather.unisys.com/hurricane/). but those far-removed from the area of impact learned from their own disaster experiences to hurricane Georges was uncoordinated and chaotic. manage the influx of evacuees. The progression of Each parish had its own separate response plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Disaster Assistance After Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, Wilma, Gustav, and Ike
    Federal Disaster Assistance After Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, Wilma, Gustav, and Ike Updated February 26, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R43139 Federal Disaster Assistance After Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, Wilma, Gustav, and Ike Summary This report provides information on federal financial assistance provided to the Gulf States after major disasters were declared in Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas in response to the widespread destruction that resulted from Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, and Wilma in 2005 and Hurricanes Gustav and Ike in 2008. Though the storms happened over a decade ago, Congress has remained interested in the types and amounts of federal assistance that were provided to the Gulf Coast for several reasons. This includes how the money has been spent, what resources have been provided to the region, and whether the money has reached the intended people and entities. The financial information is also useful for congressional oversight of the federal programs provided in response to the storms. It gives Congress a general idea of the federal assets that are needed and can be brought to bear when catastrophic disasters take place in the United States. Finally, the financial information from the storms can help frame the congressional debate concerning federal assistance for current and future disasters. The financial information for the 2005 and 2008 Gulf Coast storms is provided in two sections of this report: 1. Table 1 of Section I summarizes disaster assistance supplemental appropriations enacted into public law primarily for the needs associated with the five hurricanes, with the information categorized by federal department and agency; and 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane & Tropical Storm
    5.8 HURRICANE & TROPICAL STORM SECTION 5.8 HURRICANE AND TROPICAL STORM 5.8.1 HAZARD DESCRIPTION A tropical cyclone is a rotating, organized system of clouds and thunderstorms that originates over tropical or sub-tropical waters and has a closed low-level circulation. Tropical depressions, tropical storms, and hurricanes are all considered tropical cyclones. These storms rotate counterclockwise in the northern hemisphere around the center and are accompanied by heavy rain and strong winds (NOAA, 2013). Almost all tropical storms and hurricanes in the Atlantic basin (which includes the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea) form between June 1 and November 30 (hurricane season). August and September are peak months for hurricane development. The average wind speeds for tropical storms and hurricanes are listed below: . A tropical depression has a maximum sustained wind speeds of 38 miles per hour (mph) or less . A tropical storm has maximum sustained wind speeds of 39 to 73 mph . A hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 74 mph or higher. In the western North Pacific, hurricanes are called typhoons; similar storms in the Indian Ocean and South Pacific Ocean are called cyclones. A major hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 111 mph or higher (NOAA, 2013). Over a two-year period, the United States coastline is struck by an average of three hurricanes, one of which is classified as a major hurricane. Hurricanes, tropical storms, and tropical depressions may pose a threat to life and property. These storms bring heavy rain, storm surge and flooding (NOAA, 2013). The cooler waters off the coast of New Jersey can serve to diminish the energy of storms that have traveled up the eastern seaboard.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of 2002 Atlantic Tropical Cyclone Activity And
    SUMMARY OF 2002 ATLANTIC TROPICAL CYCLONE ACTIVITY AND VERIFICATION OF AUTHORS' SEASONAL ACTIVITY FORECAST An Early Summer Successful Forecast of an Inactive Hurricane Season - But the Many Weak, Higher Latitude Tropical Storms That Formed Were Not Anticipated (as of 21 November 2002) By William M. Gray1, Christopher W. Landsea,2 and Philip Klotzbach3 with advice and assistance from William Thorson4 and Jason Connor5 [This verification as well as past forecasts and verifications are available via the World Wide Web: http://typhoon.atmos.colostate.edu/forecasts/] Brad Bohlander or Thomas Milligan, Colorado State University Media Representatives (970-491-6432) are available to answer questions about this verification. Department of Atmospheric Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 Phone Number: 970-491-8681 2002 ATLANTIC BASIN SEASONAL HURRICANE FORECAST Tropical Cyclone Parameters Updated Updated Updated Updated Observed and 1950-2000 Climatology 7 Dec 5 April 2002 31 May 2002 7 Aug 2002 2 Sep 2002 (in parentheses) 2001 Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Totals Named Storms (NS) (9.6) 13 12 11 9 8 12 Named Storm Days (NSD) (49.1) 70 65 55 35 25 54 Hurricanes (H)(5.9) 8 7 6 4 3 4 Hurricane Days (HD)(24.5) 35 30 25 12 10 11 Intense Hurricanes (IH) (2.3) 4 3 2 1 1 2 Intense Hurricane Days (IHD)(5.0) 7 6 5 2 2 2.5 Hurricane Destruction Potential (HDP) (72.7) 90 85 75 35 25 31 Net Tropical Cyclone Activity (NTC)(100%) 140 125 100 60 45 80 VERIFICATION OF 2002 MAJOR HURRICANE LANDFALL FORECAST 7 Dec 5 Apr 31 May 7 Aug Fcst.
    [Show full text]
  • Behavioral Analysis for Southeast Louisiana Hurricane Events
    *** This Page Intentionally Left Blank *** Behavioral Analysis for Southeast Louisiana Hurricane Events National Hurricane Program Final Draft Report Prepared for: Federal Emergency Management Agency Louisiana Governor’s Office of Homeland National Hurricane Program Security and Emergency Preparedness Prepared by: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: National Planning Center of Expertise for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers New Orleans District And Dewberry Stephenson Disaster Management Institute 2835 Brandwine Road, Suite 100 Louisiana State University Atlanta, Georgia 30351 Louisiana Emerging Technology Center 340 E. Parker Street, Suite 366 Baton Rouge, LA 70803 May 2017 *** This Page Intentionally Left Blank *** Behavioral Analysis for Southeast Louisiana Hurricane Events FINAL REPORT – May 2017 Executive Summary The goal of this analysis is to understand previous evacuation behavior and potential evacuation behavior during future hurricanes for the approximate 1.8 million people who reside in southeast Louisiana. To evaluate this behavior, the Stephenson Disaster Management Institute (SDMI) at Louisiana State University (LSU) partnered with LSU’s Public Policy Research Lab to conduct a telephone survey of over 2,600 people in the 13 parishes that comprise southeast Louisiana. The study was conducted between May 2016 and January 2017, then submitted through Dewberry, the United States Army Corps of Engineers, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency to the Louisiana Governor’s Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness. In August 2016 many of the participating parishes in the study area were severely affected by the historic 1,000 year rain event in the Greater Baton Rouge area. In consideration for those affected, calling in the most severely affected parishes was put on hold immediately after the event and resumed in October 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Tropical Cyclone Report Hurricane Gustav (AL072008) 25 August – 4 September 2008
    Tropical Cyclone Report Hurricane Gustav (AL072008) 25 August – 4 September 2008 John L. Beven II and Todd B. Kimberlain National Hurricane Center 22 January 2009 Revised 15 September 2009 for peak intensity and to add new data Revised 9 September 2014 for U.S. damage Gustav moved erratically through the Greater Antilles into the Gulf of Mexico, eventually making landfall on the coast of Louisiana. It briefly became a category 4 hurricane on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Scale and caused many deaths and considerable damage in Haiti, Cuba, and Louisiana. a. Synoptic History Gustav formed from a tropical wave that moved westward from the coast of Africa on 13 August. The wave continued westward across the tropical Atlantic, with the associated shower activity first showing signs of organization on 18 August. Westerly vertical wind shear, however, prevented significant development for the next several days. The wave moved through the Windward Islands on 23 August with a broad area of low pressure accompanied by disorganized shower activity. Organization increased late on 24 August as the system moved northwestward across the southeastern Caribbean Sea, and it is estimated that a tropical depression formed near 0000 UTC 25 August about 95 n mi northeast of Bonaire in the Netherland Antilles. The “best track” chart of the tropical cyclone’s path is given in Fig. 1, with the wind and pressure histories shown in Figs. 2 and 3, respectively. The best track positions and intensities are listed in Table 11. The depression formed a small inner wind core during genesis with a radius of maximum winds of less than 10 n mi.
    [Show full text]