DOCSLIB.ORG

Arequipa Ayacucho Huancavelica Lima

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arequipa Ayacucho Huancavelica Lima .! ·# 76°0'0"O 75°0'0"O Ä Æ Æ Ä LM 7 MAPA DE UBICACIÓN 129 LIMA LM 7 131 Æ Ä LIRCAY S .! S " " LM 7 0 PE 0 ' t ' 130 0 26B 0 ° /. ° Æ 3 Ä 3 1 # Huirpina a 1 ! # 7 ar HV Tant Toldo R Huancuilla # 114 Río TUMBES LORETO AMAZONAS San Jose Llamacancha ! SAN PEDRO DE # HUACARPANA Pirup#ata PIURA ! de Chavin # Yanaco ·# Chunapata R #Chaupicirco Huayhuasca CAJAMARCA R PE tPE # # t SAN LAMBAYEQUE ® 24 Lindenen IC Rumi Cruz 26 /. MARTIN . # / ( .! 500 ! ·# HUANCAVELICA Huapunga (huaytiana) Liscay SAN VICENTE CHAVIN ! LA LIBERTAD R # Huancapampa R # í ANCASH DE CAÑETE !# o HUANUCO Jatun Pata # A # r Otapallca m # Pampa Andino # PASCO UCAYALI Chuncani Sayhua Grande a Ramadilla Bellavista ! San Jose de LIMA R JUNIN # Huacarpana (#San José) MADRE Cuyara San Luis de DE DIOS Æ # Ä ! Huañupiza CUSCO N Curitana# Curacana HUANCAVELICA IC 7 # ! IC Co#pacabana Pampa Clarita # 100 Taquia APURIMAC ( Lucmo IC 502 ! ICA ( Payamarca 501 ! PUNO lca # SAN JUAN pa ero # Huanca DE YANAC u AREQUIPA ·# Rí o Q Æ Ä Ì o Hu Rí ! Lucumo Alto acho Santa Ines Minas Santa s MOQUEGUA # ! IC 7 Beatriz ! Rinconada Cacacho # Palca 101 tPE TACNA Olivo !Huatiana # R pa Tinco ío Ca uipam 28D Yacaraquina rh /. # # Pauna Alta Buena Vista Y Baja ! .! Tororume !Toro Rumi # # tPE CASTROVIRREYNA tPE rá Chunchos Santuario 26A 28E pa Pampa de Ñoco Pati # /. /. To # o # Rí # IC Piedra Rajada Chocos 505 ( PUENTE JAHUAY ! ! Jaguay an Fundo Cerros Ju ! # #Naranjillo an Lateral Once Culebrilla N o S Rí # Tarpunca# Villa Del Mar # # Rumichaca Pampa de ñoco Hornillo ·#TICRAPO ! P Villa Alegre ! # Huayapa San Juan ! ! IC Santuario ( 522 ! ío .! # Ticacancha R CHINCHA ALTA Chilca te # en # ALTO LARAN ·# IC g ! Mina Tenta Dora N #Calera ata Conta Grande Santa Catalina 514 ( IC ! Æ Ä M fCerro Bolsa o # ( 513 ! í IC R Chaupicancha # ( 515 ! LA CALERA # IC 7 Molle PTE. CHINCHA II # 102 Abandonada Alala # !San Alfredo Arcopunco Huaca de # # Pampa Blanca # IC EL CARMEN Æ Ä ·# CHINCHA PISCO Pumarangra 518 ( Gallinazo # ! Puente IC 7 IC Ta#noyocc ( 519 ! # PTE. CHINCHA II 104 # Paracas Puquio Santo # Huenco IC a ( 523 ! ! #Labrador m INFRAESTRUCTURA DEPARTAMENTAL, IC r Lurinchincha A 520 ( ! # to i Datos Estadísticos - 2019 Fdo. Guerrero Pampano u # ! # Q o Huayanay IC í Yerba Buena R ! ( 524 ! # ha # cac Mina Sal HUANCANO PUENTE HUANCANO Aymara Viz # ío ý ! #Fdo. Fray Ramon IC ·# HUAYTARA R PE # Ps # ( t 529 ! Fdo. Natividad Veladero Grande P .! ¾ N°24 PACRA 1SE # Muralla PE Reserva Nacional /. # t ý Santa Teresa IC IC 28A 533 ( ! # IC Oroya /. ( Sistema de Islas,Islotes 525 ! 526 ( ! Camacho # Cabeza de Toro # Red Vial - SINAC Aeroportuaria y Puntas Guaneras Agua Sant#a # PUENTE LA QUINGA (Existente) # IC Ancayapampa Æ - Isla Chincha Norte, Centro y Sur Agua Blanca La Quinga Grande Ä ( IC 540 ! Letrayo Aeropuertos - Públicos 527 ( ! ! Nacional 697.3 Km HV 7 Públicos ( 683.3 Km Pav. / 14.1 Km No Pav.) 01 SAN CLEMENTE 121 Concesionados ·# # # #Fdo. Cabezudo PUENTE HUAMANI 01 Públicos Bandin INDEPENDENCIA a Departamental 743.1 Km Aeródromos Urrutia Auquish# lism ·# hau ( 48.9 Km Pav. / 694.1 Km No Pav.) 01 Privados Æ Reserva Nacional Santa Beatriz # Granja Los # C Ä PISCO Pantayco ío Sistema de Islas, Islotes # Manzanares Algarrobos # Huancacasa R # # 7 Vecinal 2 064.2 Km .! N Pampa Arteaga HUMAY HV - Públicos y Puntas Guaneras IC PUENTE CABEZA ·# Pampa Negro 118 ( 82.0 Km Pav. / 1 982.2 Km No Pav.) Helipuertos ( 582 ! Fdo. la Cruz IC AEROPUERTO PE # 02 Privados ( PE t # DE TORO R co 595 ! - Isla Ballestas Norte, Centro y Sur PISCO t 1SG ío Pis - Rio Seco 1SH . Cuchilla Vieja / o # # . IC PUENTE SAN IGNACIO l / # ? l TP MULTIBOYAS PISCO i o Fdo. la ( 584 ! Murga b ¬(¬ IC La Bolivar b m tPE m a !? ( TP PLUSPETROL - PISCO Prometida 574 ! a T # 1SC T ío # # N /. ío R !? Æ San Hilarion IC Ä !? # Costa Rica R ( 587 ! TP GENERAL Santa Elena IC Pampa Lanchas HV 7 ( 596 ! SAN MARTÍN Punta Pejerrey Río Santi 118 N # ago IC Huancacasa PE ( N (¬ t 597 ! Ferroviaria Hidrovía Punta Paracas /.1SF Escalante # Portuaria La Puntilla! N # Atenas ·# tPE IC ! La Guanera Pampa Santa Cruz - Km Públicas ( 600 ! Los Amigos 01 Públicas /.28 # ! ! PARACAS # La Laja Públicas Públicas # Fundo la Hda. Villa Luz 01 # # Cabo Blanco # - Km Concesionadas Concesionadas Museo de Paracas Fundo Santa Cruz Rinconada # Hornitos (Metro de Lima - Km) Julio C. Tello IC # 02 Privadas ( 609 ! Fdo. San Isidro Fundo Toños IC Fundo la Merced # # Mina San 602 ( # ! Lagunillas IC # - Km Privadas - Km HIDROVÍA Æ ( Ä 611 ! !Pozo Santo Miguel Rescate# Fdo. Santa Rita ! Acora 7 Pampa Santa N IC IC HV ( 610 ! # 612 ( N Pampa del Aguila ! 121 Luisa # ICA Fundo Santa Ana N # IC Laguna Los Patos Ps P #Josefina ·# ( 603 ! Cerro Patajana Cicofra #El Fraile Æ SAN JOSE DE Ä IC LOS MOLINOS 613 ( ! # 7 Æ Cristal El Olivo HV Ä # IC ! Mina Zurita ( 615 ! 119 ! HV 7 Æ #Cantera de Tiza El Carmen # Ä 121 S ·# IC #Los Romanes S " " Punta Salinillas # Aguada ! Tingo HV 7 ( Punta Zarate 622 ! 0 N GUADALUPE 0 ' N N Tambo Cruz! 120 ' 0 Zurita 0 Ì Cerro Prieto ! Col!lazos ° Isla Zarate SAN JUAN IC Pacaymoc ° 4 Salinas de Otuma ·# IC ! 4 ( 725 ! 1 BAUTISTA 1 ( ·# 651 ! Æ ! IC Ä SUBTANJALLA Ì a Æ ! Ä 631 ( ! Mina Cansas # g Macacona IC n IC IC 7 Ñahuinya a ( o 728 ! R r 7 ( 604 ! ¬ HV Æ LAS DUNAS Ä 106 # a N #! ! u 121 H Llusque # ! 7 IC Pampa El Diablo IC Espinal San José IC o í 727 ( # ! Timpuspuquio ( 114 729 ! Uchpa! ! de Curis Paclapata R IC Chavez lpo Las Mercedes N ICA ul IC 605 ( ! !P # o ! P ! o 754 ( IC g Carhua í ! Cerro Antivo in R IC ( 653 ! San Isidro # Yauria (las T # ( Reserva Nacional ío # Duraznuyoc 730 ! IC cas Quilque R ·# TIBILLO ( El Palmar 755 ! Orbejo PUENTE LOS MAESTROS Canteras) har ! ·# de Paracas Coc # # Æ o Curis Ä Rí PAMPAHUASI Pongo ! IC #Amor Seco # tPE # # Casa Blanca ora # ( El Rosario ! IC # 732 ! # as 30D El Palmarcito Buicoto AY 7 ihu /. 726 ( IC ! Toctuca ll IC # Los Aquijes Cocharcas Igosniyoc ay 673 ( ! Palomayo 113 P o ( 607 ! o y Santo Domingo o PALPA Rí a Cerro El Frontón ari ! Rosario m IC s # u IC N o Callusca# c 689 ( PAMPA DE TATE ! Fundo la R del Yauca l 608 ( ! l N Área de Conservación # e Yorascancha u Cerro Canastones ·# ·# d IC C Æ Ä Catalina o # 724 ( Tajahuana Alta TATE DE LA í ! La Candera # o R ! í Regional Laguna de CAPILLA # R IC 7 Singuro IC a Hda. Santa Luisa # t 105 Huacachina Molletambo o 757 ( is # ! ll ! u r i c u i SANTIAGO Socorral b ·# C i u ío Huamani T N # H R o # N í o IC í R ingue Misterio R Gramadal Æ T Ä Playa Carhuas # IC ío R 703 ( í ! R Punta Carreta o ! 723 ( ! # I Fdo. San ! c IC 7 Huarangal Huauyanga a Mina Chavez Seis # IC Tingüe # Francisco 107 # 718 ( Sacta ! Granado ! # Palcamarca # #Los Castillo Fdo. Santa Maria Palmar ta ca Mina Piedra ! lo IC # Ucuchimpana A ( 719 ! Pintada ío R le Æ # #Mina Esperanza Ä u N C #La Venta # # Mina Santa ío Isla 7 Marjarenja Pueblo Fuerza # IC R Independencia Gertrudis 109 Armada Malpaso N IC Isla Santa #Los Piscontes Huambo!# 754 ( ! e t Rosita # a Limoncillo m o e T ·# # Solelo ! h ICA o c í o Æ OCUCAJE Ä Mina Icas ! Huaraco R c n a AY 7 a S lp 111 Hda. Cerro a te o N ! P ma a í o ra ñ R #Blanco #San Antonio # í a ca Orongo R o L O Pampa de Huaylarilla Rí o gostura alco Paras Rí An P los Medanos ! ío ío R R Æ e Ä d n # # a Tambo Locari Alto r AY 7 G 112 o tPE í ! ! R 1S o /. Locari La Isla AYACUCHO h c n i v # Chichitara s a ! Casa Vieja izca h ! La Rancheria o V C # ! Rí uysa o Ur Saramanca í Río ! R ! Callango San Jacinto San Genaro de Cerro Punta ! # ! Punta de # de Cerro Alto Mollaque (san Genaro) Æ Cerro Alto N QueÄ mado N PUENTE RIO.GRANDE N PUENTE PALPA IC# 7 z PALPA u Isla Azua r .! ! 111 N ! El Molino #Toma Luz C Huayuri # La Peña ta PUENTE VISCAS Cerro Bandera n IC (molino) # a ( 766 ! S o San Antonio í # R Playa Media Luna ! Matature !Pueblo Nuevo Carahuarco# Æ Ä #Uliujaya ! N Carahurco # Yanahuarmi IC 7 Media Luna # ! Cerro Media Luna IC Cerro Redondo Æ 108 Ä ( 749 ! Mina Centauro # # s # 7 a IC Condoya anc ! Piedras Gordas IC 113 Tr ( 790 ! N Ullujalla ! ío IC # Arpichillo R 791 ( N ! Medanos Tunin! ·# Canaca Punta Lacra! EL INGENIO #Playa El Faro # Infiernillo IC IC CHANGUILLO ! San Javier # ·# IC 752 ( ! 830 ( ! NASCA ( ! Estudiante 787 ! Estacion Zamaca IC f # MARIA REICHE Gramada#l 785 ( ! PUENTE SAN.JOSE Playon N # IC Torre Mirador 782 ( Las Lomas de ! ! Malpaso# Río Nazca IC 798 ( Æ N Ullujalla Ä ! IC do Punta Lomitas IC 7 a ( # 784 ! Comunidad# m 112 # ue Reserva Nacional Los Batanes Mina la Española# Q # Mina Brillante bo m Sistema de Islas, Islotes Gramadal ! Ta # ío Jumana R y Puntas Guaneras - Punta Lomitas ija ! A# Chile ío N Coyungo R San Marcos tPE Santa Rosa 30A Punta de Olleros # # /. IC Cerro Aja La Ca#pilla ! N nca 753 ( # ! Estanqueria Alta a Bla # Buenos AiresP # Huancavelica Tierr Estanqueria Baja # IC La Comunidad 2 Río IC 796 ( ! 805 ( ! IC ! ! #Soisongo Tierra Blanca ! Sol de Oro 803 ( Montegrande IC Cahuachi ! # 800 ( ! .! N La Viuda VISTA ALEGRE IC # ( 793 ! ·# NASCA Mina de Oro # # IC o N Cerro Alto ( Atarco 802 ! ¬ de Nazca Puya NASCA - Cerro N Maijo Chico# # IC MARIA REICHE NEUMAN NPortachuelo ( Boca del Rio Huaroto 792 ! IC # # # 808 ( Caracoles # ! Carrizal Medina PTE.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lima Junin Pasco Ica Ancash Huanuco Huancavelica Callao Callao Huanuco Cerro De Pasco
    /" /" /" /" /" /" /" /" /" /" 78C°U0E'0N"WCA DEL RÍO CULEBRAS 77°0'0"W 76°0'0"W CUENCA DEL RÍO ALTO MARAÑON HUANUCO Colombia CUENCA DEL RÍO HUARMEY /" Ecuador CUENCA DEL RÍO SANTA 10°0'0"S 10°0'0"S TUMBES LORETO HUANUCO PIURA AMAZONAS Brasil LAMBAYEQUECAJAMARCA ANCASH SAN MARTIN LA LICBEURTAED NCA DEL RÍO PACHITEA CUENCA DEL RÍO FORTALEZA ANCASH Peru HUANUCO UCAYALI PASCO COPA ") JUNIN CALLAOLIMA CUENCA DEL RÍO PATIVILCA CUENCA DEL RÍO ALTO HUALLAGA MADRE DE DIOS CAJATAMBO HUANCAVELICA ") CUSCO AYACUCHOAPURIMAC ICA PUNO HUANCAPON ") Bolivia MANAS ") AREQUIPA GORGOR ") MOQUEGUA OYON PARAMONGA ") CERRO DE PASCOPASCO ") PATIVILCA TACNA ") /" Ubicación de la Región Lima BARRANCA AMBAR Chile ") ") SUPE PUERTOSUPE ANDAJES ") ") CAUJUL") PACHANGARA ") ") CUENCA DEL RÍO SUPE NAVAN ") COCHAMARCA ") CUENCA DEL R")ÍO HUAURA ") ")PACCHO SANTA LEONOR 11°0'0"S VEGUETA 11°0'0"S ") LEONCIO PRADO HUAURA ") CUENCA DEL RÍO PERENE ") HUALM")AY ") H")UACHO CALETA DE CARQUIN") SANTA MARIA SAYAN ") PACARAOS IHUARI VEINTISIETE DE NOVIEMBR")E N ") ") ")STA.CRUZ DE ANDAMARCA LAMPIAN ATAVILLOS ALTO ") ") ") CUENCA DEL RÍO CHANCAY - HUARAL ATAVILLOS BAJO ") SUMBILCA HUAROS ") ") CANTA JUNIN ") HUARAL HUAMANTANGA ") ") ") SAN BUENAVENTURA LACHAQUI AUCALLAMA ") CHANCAY") ") CUENCA DEL RÍO MANTARO CUENCA DEL RÍO CH")ILLON ARAHUAY LA")R")AOS ") CARAMPOMAHUANZA STA.ROSA DE QUIVES ") ") CHICLA HUACHUPAMPA ") ") SAN ANTONIO ") SAN PEDRO DE CASTA SAN MATEO ANCON ") ") ") SANTA ROSA ") LIMA ") PUENTE PIEDRACARABAYLLO MATUCANA ") ") CUENCA DEL RÍO RIMAC ") SAN MATEO DE OTAO
    [Show full text]
  • Relación De Agencias Que Atenderán De Lunes a Viernes De 8:30 A. M. a 5:30 P
    Relación de Agencias que atenderán de lunes a viernes de 8:30 a. m. a 5:30 p. m. y sábados de 9 a. m. a 1 p. m. (con excepción de la Ag. Desaguadero, que no atiende sábados) DPTO. PROVINCIA DISTRITO NOMBRE DIRECCIÓN Avenida Luzuriaga N° 669 - 673 Mz. A Conjunto Comercial Ancash Huaraz Huaraz Huaraz Lote 09 Ancash Santa Chimbote Chimbote Avenida José Gálvez N° 245-250 Arequipa Arequipa Arequipa Arequipa Calle Nicolás de Piérola N°110 -112 Arequipa Arequipa Arequipa Rivero Calle Rivero N° 107 Arequipa Arequipa Cayma Periférica Arequipa Avenida Cayma N° 618 Arequipa Arequipa José Luis Bustamante y Rivero Bustamante y Rivero Avenida Daniel Alcides Carrión N° 217A-217B Arequipa Arequipa Miraflores Miraflores Avenida Mariscal Castilla N° 618 Arequipa Camaná Camaná Camaná Jirón 28 de Julio N° 167 (Boulevard) Ayacucho Huamanga Ayacucho Ayacucho Jirón 28 de Julio N° 167 Cajamarca Cajamarca Cajamarca Cajamarca Jirón Pisagua N° 552 Cusco Cusco Cusco Cusco Esquina Avenida El Sol con Almagro s/n Cusco Cusco Wanchaq Wanchaq Avenida Tomasa Ttito Condemaita 1207 Huancavelica Huancavelica Huancavelica Huancavelica Jirón Francisco de Angulo 286 Huánuco Huánuco Huánuco Huánuco Jirón 28 de Julio N° 1061 Huánuco Leoncio Prado Rupa Rupa Tingo María Avenida Antonio Raymondi N° 179 Ica Chincha Chincha Alta Chincha Jirón Mariscal Sucre N° 141 Ica Ica Ica Ica Avenida Graú N° 161 Ica Pisco Pisco Pisco Calle San Francisco N° 155-161-167 Junín Huancayo Chilca Chilca Avenida 9 De Diciembre N° 590 Junín Huancayo El Tambo Huancayo Jirón Santiago Norero N° 462 Junín Huancayo Huancayo Periférica Huancayo Calle Real N° 517 La Libertad Trujillo Trujillo Trujillo Avenida Diego de Almagro N° 297 La Libertad Trujillo Trujillo Periférica Trujillo Avenida Manuel Vera Enríquez N° 476-480 Avenida Victor Larco Herrera N° 1243 Urbanización La La Libertad Trujillo Victor Larco Herrera Victor Larco Merced Lambayeque Chiclayo Chiclayo Chiclayo Esquina Elías Aguirre con L.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural and Mining Labor Interactions in Peru: a Long-Run Perspective
    Agricultural and Mining Labor Interactions in Peru: ALong-RunPerspective(1571-1812) Apsara Iyer1 April 4, 2016 1Submitted for consideration of B.A. Economics and Mathematics, Yale College Class of 2016. Advisor: Christopher Udry Abstract This essay evaluates the context and persistence of extractive colonial policies in Peru on contemporary development indicators and political attitudes. Using the 1571 Toledan Reforms—which implemented a system of draft labor and reg- ularized tribute collection—as a point of departure, I build a unique dataset of annual tribute records for 160 districts in the Cuzco, Huamanga, Huancavelica, and Castrovirreyna regions of Peru over the years of 1571 to 1812. Pairing this source with detailed historic micro data on population, wages, and regional agri- cultural prices, I develop a historic model for the annual province-level output. The model’s key parameters determine the output elasticities of labor and capital and pre-tribute production. This approach allows for an conceptual understand- ing of the interaction between mita assignment and production factors over time. Ithenevaluatecontemporaryoutcomesofagriculturalproductionandpolitical participation in the same Peruvian provinces, based on whether or not a province was assigned to the mita. I find that assigning districts to the mita lowers the average amount of land cultivated, per capita earnings, and trust in municipal government Introduction For nearly 250 years, the Peruvian economy was governed by a rigid system of state tribute collection and forced labor. Though the interaction between historical ex- traction and economic development has been studied in a variety of post-colonial contexts, Peru’s case is unique due to the distinct administration of these tribute and labor laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Source of 1746 Callao Earthquake from Tsunami Numerical Modeling
    Jimenez, C. et al. Paper: Seismic Source of 1746 Callao Earthquake from Tsunami Numerical Modeling Cesar Jimenez∗1,∗2, Nabilt Moggiano∗2, Erick Mas∗3, Bruno Adriano∗3, Shunichi Koshimura∗3, Yushiro Fujii∗4, and Hideaki Yanagisawa∗5 ∗1Fenlab, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos (UNMSM) Av Venezuela s/n, Lima, Peru E-mail: [email protected] ∗2Direccion de Hidrografia y Navegacion (DHN) Calle Roca N 116, Chucuito-Callao, Peru ∗3Laboratory of Remote Sensing and Geoinformatics for Disaster Management, International Research Institute of Disaster Science, Tohoku University Aoba 6-6-03, Sendai 980-8579, Japan ∗4International Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, Building Research Institute Tatehara, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0802, Japan ∗5Department of Regional Management, Faculty of Liberal Arts, Tohoku Gakuin University 2-1-1 Tenjinzawa, Izumi-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 981-3193, Japan [Received November 2, 2012; accepted February 8, 2013] In this paper a model of slip distribution is proposed and crustal deformation. This is not the case for his- for the 1746 Callao earthquake and tsunami based on torical events such as the 1746 earthquake, however. In macroseismic observations written in historical docu- this sense, we can only infer or estimate a seismic source ments. This is done using computational tools such as model from macroseismic and tsunami descriptions of tsunami numerical simulation through a forward pro- historical documents found in the literature. cess by trial and error. The idea is to match historical observations with numerical simulation results to ob- tain a plausible seismic source model. Results show 2. Historical Aspects a high asperity from Canete˜ to Huacho, which would explain the great destruction in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Vm Holding S.A. Technical Report on the Pukaqaqa
    VM HOLDING S.A. TECHNICAL REPORT ON THE PUKAQAQA PROJECT, HUANCAVELICA REGION, PERU NI 43-101 Report Qualified Persons: José Texidor Carlsson, P Geo. Katharine Masun, P.Geo. David M. Robson, P.Eng., M.B.A. Kathleen Ann Altman, Ph.D., P.E. Stephan Theben, Dipl-Ing., SLR Consulting (Canada) Ltd. August 4, 2017 RPA 55 University Ave. Suite 501 I Toronto, ON, Canada M5J 2H7 IT + 1 (416) 947 0907 www.rpacan.com www.rpacan.com Report Control Form Document Title Technical Report on the Pukaqaqa Project, Huancavelica Region, Peru Client Name & Address VM Holding S.A. rd 43 ave John Fitzgerald Kennedy, 3 Floor L-1855 LUXEMBOURG Document Reference Status & FINAL Project #2783 Issue No. Version Issue Date August 4, 2017 Lead Author José Texidor Carlsson (Signed) Katharine Masun (Signed) David M. Robson (Signed) Kathleen Ann Altman (Signed) Stephan Theben (Signed) Peer Reviewer David Smith (Signed) Project Manager Approval Luke Evans (Signed) Project Director Approval Deborah McCombe (Signed) Report Distribution Name No. of Copies Client RPA Filing 1 (project box) Roscoe Postle Associates Inc. 55 University Avenue, Suite 501 Toronto, ON M5J 2H7 Canada Tel: +1 416 947 0907 Fax: +1 416 947 0395 [email protected] VM Holding S.A. – Pukaqaqa Project, Project #2783 Technical Report NI 43-101 – August 4, 2017 Page i www.rpacan.com TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1 SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 1-1 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Peru-CPF-112299-PE-04102017.Pdf
    Document of The World Bank Group FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized Report No. 112299-PE INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL FINANCE CORPORATION AND MULTILATERAL INVESTMENT GUARANTEE AGENCY Public Disclosure Authorized COUNTRY PARTNERSHIP FRAMEWORK FOR THE REPUBLIC OF PERU FOR THE PERIOD FY17-FY21 April 4, 2017 Public Disclosure Authorized Bolivia, Chile, Ecuador, Peru and Venezuela Country Management Unit Latin America and the Caribbean Region The International Finance Corporation Latin America and the Caribbean Region The Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency Public Disclosure Authorized This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank Group authorization. ii The date of the last Country Partnership Strategy FY12-FY16 was February 1, 2012 (Report No. 66187-PE) CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange rate effective as of March 19, 2017) US$1 = 3.26 Soles FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 PRINCIPAL ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ASA Advisory Services and Analytics BCRP Central Reserve Bank of Peru (Banco Central de Reserva del Perú) B4O Bottom 40 percent of the population CAF Latin American Development Bank (Banco de Desarrollo de América Latina) CAT DDO Catastrophe Deferred Drawdown Option CPF Country Partnership Framework DPF DDO Development Policy Financing with a Deferred Drawdown Option ENAHO Household Survey (Encuesta Nacional de Hogares) EPSs Water State
    [Show full text]
  • The Persistent Effects of Peru's Mining Mita
    Econometrica, Vol. 78, No. 6 (November, 2010), 1863–1903 THE PERSISTENT EFFECTS OF PERU’S MINING MITA BY MELISSA DELL1 This study utilizes regression discontinuity to examine the long-run impacts of the mita, an extensive forced mining labor system in effect in Peru and Bolivia between 1573 and 1812. Results indicate that a mita effect lowers household consumption by around 25% and increases the prevalence of stunted growth in children by around 6 percentage points in subjected districts today. Using data from the Spanish Empire and Peruvian Republic to trace channels of institutional persistence, I show that the mita’s influence has persisted through its impacts on land tenure and public goods provision. Mita districts historically had fewer large landowners and lower educational attainment. Today, they are less integrated into road networks and their residents are substantially more likely to be subsistence farmers. KEYWORDS: Forced labor, land tenure, public goods. 1. INTRODUCTION THE ROLE OF HISTORICAL INSTITUTIONS in explaining contemporary underde- velopment has generated significant debate in recent years.2 Studies find quan- titative support for an impact of history on current economic outcomes (Nunn (2008), Glaeser and Shleifer (2002), Acemoglu, Johnson, and Robinson (2001, 2002), Hall and Jones (1999)), but have not focused on channels of persistence. Existing empirical evidence offers little guidance in distinguishing a variety of potential mechanisms, such as property rights enforcement, inequality, ethnic fractionalization, barriers to entry, and public goods. This paper uses variation in the assignment of an historical institution in Peru to identify land tenure and public goods as channels through which its effects persist.
    [Show full text]
  • Junin Huancavelica Cusco Apurimac Arequipa
    500000 550000 600000 650000 700000 75°0'0"W 74°0'0"W 73°0'0"W 80°0'0"W 75°0'0"W 70°0'0"W " " 0 0 ' ' 0 0 ° ° JUNIN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 COLOMBIA 0 5 ECUADOR 5 6 6 8 8 Ü ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Mulacocha ! ! Río Mantaro ! ! ! ! ! S S ! " " ! 0 0 ! ! n ' ' ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 0 0 ! ! ! Á t ° ° ! ! a 5 5 ! c ! ! ! s i ! ! ! ! ! V ! ! o ! Í LLOCHEGUA 5 R ! ! ! ! ta o n ! c o a c A im u io h R BRASIL C ! ! ! o ! ! ! ! ! Í ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! n ! ! ! ! ! R ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! o ! ! ! ! ! ! SIVIA ! ! ! ! ! Laguna Chillhuacocha ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! c ! 5 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! A ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! S S ! ! ! ! ! ! ! o ! ! ! ! ! ! i " " ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 0 0 ! ! ! ! R ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ' ' ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! 0 0 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ° ° ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 0 0 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! 1 1 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Río Piene ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Laguna Ranracocha !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
    [Show full text]
  • Peru: Floods 2 February 2010
    DREF operation n° MDRPE004 GLIDE n° : FL-2009-000261-PER Peru: Floods 2 February 2010 The International Federation’s Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF) is a source of un-earmarked money created by the Federation in 1985 to ensure that immediate financial support is available for Red Cross and Red Crescent emergency response. The DREF is a vital part of the International Federation’s disaster response system and increases the ability of National Societies to respond to disasters. CHF 171,122 (USD 161,491 or EUR 116,241) has been allocated from the Federation’s Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF) to support the Peruvian Red Cross (PRC) in delivering immediate assistance to some 5,000 beneficiaries. Un-earmarked funds to repay DREF are encouraged. Summary: Continuous rainfall since December 2009 has caused floods and mudslides in Peru. The Peruvian National Civil Defence Institute assessments have reported 11 departments affected: Amazonas, Ancash, Ucayali, Junín, Ayacucho, Arequipa, Lima, Cusco, Huancavelica, Puno and Apurimac. Although assessments are ongoing, it has been ascertained that approximately 63,480 people have been affected by the floods. In the department of Cusco alone, it is reported that a total of 34,730 people have been affected. The Peruvian Red Cross emergency response focuses on the provision of essential relief items and the promotion of community health in the department of Cusco. This DREF operation will support the National In the department of Huancavelica alone 1,084 people Society in delivering this much needed assistance to have been affected according to reports from the the most vulnerable families.
    [Show full text]
  • La Importancia De La Carretera Central Reporte
    2016 La importancia de la Carretera Central Reporte Imagen de la Carretera Central. Latitud Sur 11.6154307, Longitud Oeste 76.2077978. Fuente: Google Maps. Elaborado por: Fernando Vicente Alarcón Huanca Revisado por: Javier J. E. Molina Villanueva N° 001-2016 Dirección de Regulación y Normatividad – DGTT – MTC 1. La Carretera Central La Carretera Central, es el nombre con el que comúnmente se conoce al tramo N° 2 del Corredor Vial Interoceánico Centro. La vía se denomina de esa manera a partir del intercambio vial de Santa Anita en la ciudad de Lima y consta de un solo tramo que conecta Lima con la ciudad de La Oroya en la región Junín. Se entregó en concesión al consorcio Desarrollo Vial de los Andes S.A.C. (DEVIANDES) por un periodo de vigencia de 25 años contados a partir del 27 de septiembre del 2010. La concesión se dio a cabo bajo el esquema BOT (build, operate and transfer; construcción, operación y transferencia en inglés), que consiste en el tipo de concesión donde la empresa privada construye y opera un complejo o sistema hasta el término del periodo de concesión, fecha en la que transfiere la propiedad al Estado. Según datos del Organismo Supervisor de la Inversión en Infraestructura de Transporte de Uso Público (OSITRAN), DEVIANDES ha invertido en la concesión un monto de 100 millones de dólares (OSITRAN, 2014a). En la Ilustración 1 se presenta gráficamente el trazo de la concesión a DEVIANDES. El sector concesionado a la Carretera Central se inicia en el puente Ricardo Palma, ubicado en la provincia de Huarochirí, y recorre 135 km hasta llegar a la Oroya, este tramo de la concesión se encuentra dentro de la ruta PE-22.
    [Show full text]
  • Junin Lima Pasco Cusco Ucayali Huancavelica
    76°0'0"O 75°0'0"O 74°0'0"O HUANUCO Obras 2013 JUNÍN YANAHUANCA HUANUCO DV. ISCOZACIN Intervenciones en la Red Vial Nacional OXAPAMPA PASCO Obra Const. Contratada Por Iniciar CERRO Pte. Puellas Pte. Chivis UCAYALI OYON DE PASCO VILLA RICA ATALAYA YAUPI UNISH PUEBLO LIBRE CHURIN CAMONASHARI SHALIPAYCO VICCO Obra R.M. En Ejecución PE PE MIRAFLORES NUEVA JERUSALEN Carretera Chanchamayo - Villa Rica, 5S COCHAMARCA Tr.: Pte. Raither - Pte. Paucartambo - Villa Rica 5N CARHUAMAYO BAJO PICHANAQUI PUENTE REITHER ULCUMAYO QUIMARINI S S " " 0 0 ' HUAYLLAY HUAYRE PAMPA CAMONA CHANCHAMAYO BOCA DE IPOKI PE ' 0 0 ° 5SA ° 1 CHANCHAMAYO 1 1 JUNIN TINGO 1 COLMES LA MERCED ALTO VILLA VICTORIA LA PROMISORA VILLA MORETI MINA SANTO DOMINGO SAN RAMON CASCA COLONIA HUANCA PE PACCHA PATACANCHA SAN JOSE PUERTO OCOPA DE UTCUYACU 20A JUNIN CUSHIVIANI SHINCAYACU ALPAMARCA PE PE NUEVA ACOS 3N 22B ESPERANZA PE POYENI CONOCANCHA SATIPO TARMA SHINAYACU Obra de Mej. Programadas por iniciar 5S LA CIMA LP 023-2012-MTC-20 Obra R.M. En Ejecución Satipo - Mazamari - Dv. Pangoa - Carretera Dv. Las Vegas - Tarma Puerto Ocopa PALCA MARANIOC MAZAMARI VEGAS MARIPOSA MAL PASO TARMA MARCAPOMACOCHA SAN MARTIN TAMBILLO UCHUBAMBA PE DE PANGOA 24A CANTA TOLDOPAMPA YAULI LA OROYA RUMICHACA CALABAZA CURICOCHA SANTA ROSA CANCHACHUCCLLA CURIBAMBA DE SACCO TUPAC AMARU SANTA ROSA DE CURIMARCA ALTO QUIATARI LOMOLARGO MACON CUBANTIA MOROCOCHA JUNIN RUNATULLO PE SATIPO ALTO ANAPATI 22 ESTACION DE HUARI JAUJA PE COMAS 3S CHACAPALPA SAN MATEO SACSACANCHA BOCA SONARO SAN JOSE DE ANDAYCHAGUA CONCEPCION JAUJA PUNTO PE POMABAMBA SAN ANTONIO DE OCOPA 28C PINASCOCHA VIEJA MATUCANA CONCEPCION MINA PACHANCUTO PUERTO RICO PE S 3SB S " " 0 0 ' COLPA ' 0 ACOPALCA 0 ° SURTUCANCHA ° 2 2 1 COPCA PILCOMAYO 1 SAN JOSE RONCHA DE QUERO CHUPACA HUANCAYO CHILCA SAPALLANGA PE 24 HUANCAYO PE 3SC LEYENDA CHAUCHA CHUPACA PUERTO ENE LIMA NATIVIDAD OBRAS 2013 PE Carreteras Puentes y 3S Mejoramiento (M), Rehabilitación (R) Otros DV.
    [Show full text]
  • Access Barriers to Comprehensive Care for People Affected by Tuberculosis and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Coinfection in Peru, 2010–2015*
    Pan American Journal Original research of Public Health Access barriers to comprehensive care for people affected by tuberculosis and human immunodeficiency virus coinfection in Peru, 2010–2015* Lisset García-Fernández,1 Carlos Benites,1 and Byelca Huamán1 Suggested citation (Original Article) García-Fernández L, Benites C, Huamán B. Barreras para el acceso a la atención integral de las personas afectadas por la coinfección por tuberculosis y virus de inmunodeficiencia humana en Perú, 2010–2015. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2017;41:e23. ABSTRACT Objective. Identify the programmatic barriers that hinder access to comprehensive care of patients with tuberculosis and human immunodeficiency virus (TB/HIV) coinfection. Methods. This is a mixed-method study. Qualitative research was conducted via in-depth interviews with key actors and the quantitative component involved cross-sectional descriptive analysis of programmatic data from 2010-2015 on tuberculosis and HIV programs at health facilities in the cities of Lima and Iquitos. Results. Twenty-two key actors in seven establishments were interviewed. The iden tified barriers were: little or no coordination between tuberculosis and HIV teams, separate manage- ment of tuberculosis and HIV cases at different levels of care, insufficient financing, limited or poorly trained human resources, and lack of an integrated information system. It was found that HIV screening in TB patients increased (from 18.8% in 2011 to 95.2% in 2015), isoniazid coverage of HIV patients declined (from 62% to 9%), and the proportion of deaths among TB/ HIV coinfection cases averaged 20%. Conclusions. There is poor coordination between HIV and TB health strategies. Management of TB/HIV coinfection is framented into different levels of care, which has an impact on comprehensive patien care.
    [Show full text]