DOCSLIB.ORG

Rural Roads Prioritization Report Iringa District

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rural Roads Prioritization Report Iringa District RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT IRINGA DISTRICT Technical Assistance to Support the Development of Irrigation and Rural Roads Infrastructure Project (IRRIP2) December 2017 This document was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by CDM Smith for the Technical Assistance to Support the Development of Irrigation and Rural Roads Infrastructure Project, Task Order number AID-621-TO- 12-00002, under the USAID Global A&E IQC (Contract No.: EDH-I-00-08-00023-00). February 2013 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by CDM International Inc. OCTOBER 2012 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by CDM International Inc. RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT IRINGA DISTRICT Technical Assistance to Support the Development of Irrigation and Rural Roads Infrastructure Project (IRRIP2) Prepared by: Richard Mwakasitu, Roads Component Lead Keith F. Williams, P.E., Chief of Party Organization: CDM International, Inc. (CDM Smith) Submitted to: Boniphace Marwa, United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) USAID Contract No.: EDH-I-00-08-00023-00, Task Order AID-621-TO-12-00002 Report Date: 06 December 2017 DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................4 1.1 Project Overview....................................................................................................4 1.1.1 Overall FTF Goals and Objectives ..........................................................4 1.1.2 FTF Project Activities ..............................................................................4 1.1.3 IRRIP2 Goals, Objective and Expected Results .....................................4 1.1.4 Rural Roads Infrastructure ......................................................................5 1.2 Iringa District Rural Roads Prioritization Context...................................................5 2 DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION ..........................................................................................5 3 DISTRICT POTENTIAL.....................................................................................................5 3.1 The Midland Zone ..................................................................................................5 3.2 The Lowland Zone .................................................................................................6 4 ROAD NETWORK DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................6 4.1 Socio-economic Role .............................................................................................6 4.2 Traffic .....................................................................................................................6 4.3 Description of Roads..............................................................................................6 4.4 Drainage Structures ...............................................................................................7 5 ROAD PRIORITIZATION PROCESS................................................................................7 5.1 Training on the Prioritization Tool ..........................................................................7 5.2 Approaches to the Prioritization Process ...............................................................7 5.3 Selection of the Road Segments ...........................................................................8 5.4 Traffic Counts.........................................................................................................8 5.5 Data Collection.......................................................................................................8 5.6 Prioritization Tool Layout and Format ....................................................................8 5.7 Criteria used in the Prioritization Process ..............................................................8 5.7.1 Road Network Connectivity.....................................................................8 5.7.2 Population ...............................................................................................9 5.7.3 Current Transport Demand .....................................................................9 5.7.4 Relevance to Agricultural Development ..................................................9 5.7.5 Access to Social Services .......................................................................9 5.7.6 Road Condition........................................................................................9 5.7.7 Cost Estimates. .......................................................................................9 5.8 Prioritization Tool Application...............................................................................10 5.9 Prioritization Tool Output .....................................................................................10 5.10 Selected Major Bridges........................................................................................11 RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT IRINGA DISTRICT i 6 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................12 ANNEXES Annex A Data Collection Forms Annex B Tool Workings and Output Annex C Cost Estimates Annex D Location Map TABLES Table 4.1: Road Network Distribution by Classification and Surface Type................6 Table 5.1: Prioritization Ranking..............................................................................11 Table 5.2: List of Major Bridges ...............................................................................11 RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT IRINGA DISTRICT ii Acronyms and Abbreviations ADT Average daily traffic CM Council Manager - TARURA DROMAS District roads maintenance system FARIL Fixed Amount Reimbursement Implementation Letter FtF Feed the Future (a USAID food security initiative) GoT Government of Tanzania IRRIP2 Irrigation and Rural Roads Infrastructure Project 2 km Kilometer km/hr Kilometers per hour LGA Local government authority LGV Light goods vehicle MCC Manual classified count MGV Medium goods vehicle MT Motorized traffic NMT Non-motorized traffic NPV Net present value PQM Project Quality Management RRDP Rural Roads Development Project RUC Road user cost SOAG Strategic Objective Grant Agreement TANROADS Tanzania National Roads Agency TARURA Tanzania Rural and Urban Roads Agency TZS Tanzanian Shilling USAID United States Agency for International Development USD United States Dollars vpd Vehicles per day RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT IRINGA DISTRICT iii 1 INTRODUCTION This report documents the status of Iringa District’s efforts to identify and prioritize rural roads within their network for inclusion in the “Rural Roads Development Project” rehabilitation activities included under the Irrigation and Rural Roads Infrastructure Project (IRRIP), funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). 1.1 Project Overview On July 26, 2005, the United States of America, acting through USAID and the Government of the United Republic of Tanzania (GoT), through the Ministry of Finance executed Strategic Objective Grant Agreement (SOAG) Number 12 for Incomes of Small Farmers Increased in Selected Agricultural Commodity Sub-Sectors. To achieve that Objective, the Parties agreed to work together under the Feed the Future (FTF) initiative to achieve the following Results: (1) Increased production of selected agricultural commodities and (2) Increased access to markets in selected community agricultural commodities. 1.1.1 Overall FTF Goals and Objectives The overall FTF goals and objectives are: Developing the rice sector to spur growth; Increasing food security through improved productivity, processing, transport, and storage in maize and rice sectors; and Improving nutritional status of Tanzanians through the development of the horticulture sector. 1.1.2 FTF Project Activities Among the activities to be implemented under the FTF initiatives are: IRRIP: IRRIP1 (engineering services) and IRRIP2 (technical assistance) Focus Value Chains for Staples (rice and maize) and Horticulture Food Processing Nutrition Policy Reforms Research and Training Monitoring and Evaluation 1.1.3 IRRIP2 Goals, Objective and Expected Results The IRRIP2 activity has its own goals, objectives and expected results. These are: Expanded access to markets: FTF Target is to rehabilitate at least 1,000 km of rural roads Improved and sustainable increase in irrigated agricultural productivity: FTF target is to add 47,000 ha of irrigated area through 7 smallholder schemes in Morogoro and Zanzibar (IRRIP1 + IRRIP2) Increased capacity of Government authorities involved in irrigation and rural roads infrastructure RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT IRINGA DISTRICT 4 1.1.4 Rural Roads Infrastructure Under IRRIP2 through Rural Roads Development Project (RRDP), approximately 1,000 km of strategic rural roads are planned to be rehabilitated and upgraded. These roads are: Collector and feeder roads in three districts of Iringa, Kilolo, and Mufindi District Councils in Iringa Region. Collector and feeder road in four
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RMO Newsletter December 2017 Results Management Office
    Issue 01 RMO Newsletter December 2017 Results Management Office Content Foreword Program highlights Success stories Page 02 I would like to extend It is a little after 10 o’clock on in Mufindi district, Kasanga gratitude to all our partners a Thursday morning in July ward, in the heart of Iringa for the great work thus far. 2017. The sun is overhead but region, six groups comprising We have recently......... a majority of the........ a total.............. Page 04 Page 06 Page 14 Collaboration. Impact. Growth. RMO Newsletter | Issue 01 | December 2017 RMO Newsletter | Issue 01 | December 2017 Contents 04 06 10 12 14 18 Foreword Program highlights Program highlights Program highlights Success stories Success stories – US diplomat visits Ilula – A newly renovated facility – Program Review Meeting – Orphans and Vulnerable – Working with CSOs to link Lutheran Hospital in Iringa at the Saba Saba Health in Morogoro Program Children supported clients back to CTC services Centre through SILC groups 02 03 RMO Newsletter | Issue 01 | December 2017 RMO Newsletter | Issue 01 | December 2017 Foreword I would like to extend gratitude to all million budget, the USAID Boresha I would be remiss if I failed to our partners for the great work thus Afya project’s core vision is to create acknowledge the immense contribution far. We have recently concluded one a dynamic, integrated platform of my outstanding team including year since this programme commenced for delivery of health services that our implementing partners; FHI360, and while we faced teething problems emphasizes strong collaboration Management and Development for in the beginning, I can now state with between government, health facilities Health (MDH) and EngenderHealth certainty that we are on course to meet and communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Iringa-Summary-Brief-Final.Pdf
    STRATEGIC AssEssMENT TO DEFINE A COMPREHENSIVE RESPONSE TO HIV IN IRINGA, TANZANIA RESEARCH BRIEF SUMMARY OF FINDINGS STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT TO DEFINE A COMPREHENSIVE RESPONSE TO HIV IN IRINGA, TANZANIA RESEARCH BRIEF SUMMARY OF FINDINGS September 2013 The USAID | Project SEARCH, Task Order No.2, is funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development under Contract No. GHH-I-00-07-00032-00, beginning September 30, 2008, and supported by the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief. The Research to Prevention (R2P) Project is led by the Johns Hopkins Center for Global Health and managed by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Center for Communication Programs (CCP). Iringa Strategic Assessment: Summary of Findings TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................. 2 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 3 METHODS ............................................................................................................................ 5 Quantitative Methods .................................................................................................................................. 5 Review of existing data including recent data triangulation efforts ........................................................... 5 DHS analysis ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TFCG Technical Paper 18 the VERTEBRATE BIODIVERSITY AND
    TFCG Technical Paper 18 THE VERTEBRATE BIODIVERSITY AND FOREST CONDITION OF UDZUNGWA MOUNTAIN FORESTS IN MUFINDI DISTRICT By N. Doggart, C. Leonard, A. Perkin, M. Menegon and F. Rovero Dar es Salaam June 2008 Cover photographs by Michele Menegon. From left to right. 1. Horned bush viper eating a reed frog. 2. View of Igoda Forest and adjacent tea fields. 3. Spiny flanked chameleon (Chamaeleo laterispinis) ¤ Tanzania Forest Conservation Group Suggested citations: Whole report Doggart, N., C. Leonard, A. Perkin, M. Menegon and F. Rovero (2008). The Biodiversity and forest condition of Udzungwa Mountain forests in Mufindi District. TFCG Technical Paper No 18. DSM, Tz. 1- 142 pp. Sections with Report: (example using section 3) Menegon, M., (2008). Reptiles and Amphibians. In: Doggart, N., C. Leonard, A. Perkin, M. Menegon and F. Rovero (2008). The Biodiversity and forest condition of Udzungwa Mountain forests in Mufindi District.TFCG Technical Paper No 18. DSM, Tz. 1 - 142 pp. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction The Eastern Arc Mountain forests in Mufindi District lie at the south-western extreme of the Eastern Arc. The forests are found on the Mufindi plateau at the top of the Mufindi escarpment. The plateau includes a mosaic of forest, commercial tea cultivation, pine and eucalyptus plantation, coffee and subsistence agriculture. The forests of Mufindi are highly fragmented and many of them show high levels of disturbance some of which dates back over 50 years. Lovett & Pócs (1993) suggest that parts of the larger Mufindi forests such as Kigogo were cultivated in the mid 19th Century and cite the presence of agricultural ridges under the forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Bringing Nutrition to Scale Project in Iringa, Mbeya and Njombe
    Evaluation of the Bringing Nutrition to Scale Project in Iringa, Mbeya and Njombe Regions (2013–2017) Evaluation Report 23 April 2018 Prepared by Stephen Turner (Team Leader) Bjorn Ljungqvist Joyce Kinabo Jim Grabham Proposal contacts: Evaluation of Bringing Nutrition to Scale in Iringa, Mbeya and Njombe ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND DISCLAIMER The evaluation team are grateful to the nutrition colleagues at the UNICEF Country Office in Dar es Salaam and the Sub-office in Mbeya for all their support in providing information and facilitating meetings throughout this assignment. Quality support for the evaluation has been provided by the QS team assigned to the evaluation: Stephen Anderson (Food Economy Group) and Stephen Lister (Mokoro Ltd). The authors take full responsibility for the contents of this report. The designations employed, maps and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNICEF concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delineation of its frontiers or boundaries. ii Evaluation of Bringing Nutrition to Scale in Iringa, Mbeya and Njombe Contents Summary v 1. Introduction __________________________________________________ 1 1.1. Evaluation purpose and scope ___________________________________ 1 1.2. Country context ______________________________________________ 1 1.3. Nutrition in Tanzania and the project area __________________________ 2 2. The BNTS and ASRP projects _____________________________________ 5 2.1. Project description ____________________________________________ 5 2.2. Key stakeholders and linkages ___________________________________ 8 2.3. Summary of reported performance ______________________________ 10 3. Approach and methods _________________________________________ 11 3.1. Evaluation approach __________________________________________ 11 3.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Socio-Economic Root Causes of the Loss of Biodiversity in the Ruaha Catchment Area
    SOCIO-ECONOMIC ROOT CAUSES OF THE LOSS OF BIODIVERSITY IN THE RUAHA CATCHMENT AREA By H. Sosovele & J.J. Ngwale With contributions from C. Malima and D. Mvella Report submitted to WWF- Tanzania March 2002 i TABLE OF CONTENT Page Abbreviations……………………………………………………………………… .iv Acknowledgement………...…………………………………………………………. v 1. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Introduction............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Objective of the Root Causes Analysis............................................................... 1 2.0 BASELINE CONDITION …………………………………………….2 2.1 Socio-Economic Characteristics of the RCA............................................................ 2 2.1.1 Population Changes ........................................................................................... 2 2.1.2 Economic Activities........................................................................................... 3 2.1.2.1 Agriculture .................................................................................................. 3 2.1.2.2 Livestock keeping ....................................................................................... 3 2.1.2.3 Mining......................................................................................................... 3 2.1.2.4 Timber/Logging .......................................................................................... 4 2.1.2.5 Plantations..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Iringa Region Socio-Economic Profile, 2013
    The United Republic of Tanzania IRINGA REGION SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE, 2013 October, 2013 The United Republic of Tanzania IRINGA REGION SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE, 2013 Jointly prepared Ministry of Finance, National Bureau of Statistics and Iringa Regional Secretariat National Bureau of Statistics Dar es Salaam October, 2013 Iringa Region Socio-Economic Profile, 2013 Foreword The goals of Tanzania‟s Development Vision 2025 are in line with United Nation‟s Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and are pursued through the National Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty (NSGRP) or MKUKUTA II. The major goals are to achieve a high-quality livelihood for the people, attain good governance through the rule of law and develop a strong and competitive economy. To monitor the progress in achieving these goals, there is need for timely, accurate data and information at all levels. Problems especially in rural areas are many and demanding. Social and economic Tservices require sustainable improvement. The high primary school enrolment rates recently attained have to be maintained and so is the policy of making sure that all pupils who pass standard seven examinations join Form One. The food situation is still precarious; infant and maternal mortality rates continue are high and unemployment triggers mass migration of youths from rural areas to the already overcrowded urban centres. Added to the above problems, is the menace posed by HIV/AIDS, the prevalence of which hinders efforts to advance into the 21st century of science and technology. The pandemic has been quite severe among the economically active population leaving in its wake an increasing number of orphans, broken families and much suffering.
    [Show full text]
  • Reforestation in Grassland Areas of Idete, Mufindi District, Iringa Region, Tanzania
    CLIMATE, COMMUNITY AND BIODIVERSITY STANDARDS PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CCB-AR-PDD) Reforestation in grassland areas of Idete, Mufindi District, Iringa Region, Tanzania. Page 1 of 109 CONTENTS I. BASIC DATA II. GENERAL SECTION G1. ORIGINAL CONDITIONS AT PROJECT SITE G2. BASELINE PROJECTIONS G3. PROJECT DESIGN & GOALS G4. MANAGEMENT CAPACITY G5. LAND TENURE G6. LEGAL STATUS G7. ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT FOR SUSTAINABILITY (OPTIONAL ) G8. KNOWLEDGE DISSEMINATION III. CLIMATE SECTION CL1. NET POSITIVE CLIMATE IMPACTS CL2. OFFSITE CLIMATE IMPACTS (“L EAKAGE ”) CL3. CLIMATE IMPACT MONITORING CL4. ADAPTING TO CLIMATE CHANGE AND CLIMATE VARIABILITY (OPTIONAL ) CL5. CARBON BENEFITS WITHHELD FROM REGULATORY MARKETS (OPTIONAL ) IV. COMMUNITY SECTION CM1. NET POSITIVE COMMUNITY IMPACTS CM2. OFFSITE COMMUNITY IMPACTS CM3. COMMUNITY IMPACT MONITORING CM4. CAPACITY BUILDING (OPTIONAL ) CM5. BEST PRACTICES IN COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT (OPTIONAL ) V. BIODIVERSITY SECTION B1. NET POSITIVE BIODIVERSITY IMPACTS B2. OFFSITE BIODIVERSITY IMPACTS B3. BIODIVERSITY IMPACT MONITORING B4. NATIVE SPECIES USE (OPTIONAL ) B5. WATER AND SOIL RESOURCE ENHANCEMENT (OPTIONAL ) Annex 1: Standard Operating Procedure: Baseline sampling Annex 2: Monitoring Plan Page 2 of 109 I. BASIC DATA Green Resources Limited (GRL) is the leading plantation, carbon offset and renewable energy company in Eastern Africa. Green Resources AS are conducting reforestation activities in a number of locations in Tanzania, Uganda and Mozambique, with the purpose of deriving revenue streams from the sale of carbon offsets and timber, whilst simultaneously bringing community and environmental benefits. The Idete Forest Project (IFP) is developed by GRL. This project is also applying for the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) validation and verification under the A/R category with approved methodology A/R AM0005 version 04.
    [Show full text]
  • United Republic of Tanzania
    UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA PRESIDENT’S OFFICE REGIONAL ADMINISTRATION AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT KILOLO DISTRICT COUNCIL KILOLO DISTRICT COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE YEAR 2015/2016-2020/2021 Prepared By: District Executive Director, P.O.BOX 2324, KILOLO. TEL: 0785 261723/0262968010 FAX: 026 2968010 WEB: www.kilolodc.go.tz EMAIL:[email protected] 1 CONTENTS STATEMENT OF KILOLO DISTRICT COUNCIL CHAIRMAN ..................................... 3 SUMMARY OF THE DISTRICT PROFILE .............................................................. 4 KEY ISSUES .................................................................................................. 9 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .......................................................................... 11 KILOLO WATER SECTOR ............................................................................... 19 SECONDARY EDUDUCTION ........................................................................... 26 PRIMARY EDUCATION ................................................................................... 28 SECTOR/SUBSECTOR HEALTH ....................................................................... 30 PLANNING AND ECONOMY ............................................................................ 49 SECTOR/SUB SECTOR:WORKS ...................................................................... 59 SECTOR/SUB SECTOR………………NATURAL RESOURCS ....................................... 69 LAND SECTOR ............................................................................................. 94 SECTOR/SUBSECTOR:AGRICULTURE
    [Show full text]
  • Programme of LUD Field Visit Ihemi- Cluster
    Programme of LUD field visit Ihemi- cluster Dates: 31st October and 1st November 2016 Time Location Brief Description Hosts/focal person. Day 1: 31st October 2016, Kilolo District. 0930-1015 Iringa Courtesy call to Iringa region Secretariat office ( RAS and RC): SAGCOT Centre Ltd regional Objective: Explain the objectives of establishing the land use dialogue in focal person/ Cluster Ihemi Cluster and what will be the expected outputs/outcomes of the Coordinator platform(s). 1000-1030 Iringa Participants Gathering at Gentle Hill Logistic Officer 1030-1100 Kilolo Travel from Iringa town to Kilolo district Cluster Coordinator 1100-1130 Kilolo DED There will be a discussion with the district land committee. Land officer-Kilolo. office Objective: There will be an explanation of land use platform objectives from the team, there after the team will hear about land use issues which includes land allocations, village land use planning and the challenges encountered in the district. 1130-1210 Kilolo/Kidabaga Drive Kilolo to Kidabaga Village 1210-1230 Kidabaga Meeting with the Kidabaga village land use committee; Land officer-Kilolo Objectives: Get to understand the role of village land use committee on village land use mandates, the involvement of the committee in natural forestry conservation. 1230-1320 Kidabaga Visiting the Kidabaga forestry reserve: Land Officer-Kilolo Forestry Reserve Objectives: To view natural forestry protected area and compare with a nearby degrading land due to poor farming practices also see the conversion of land from crop farming to exotic tree planting. 1320-1400 Kidabaga Lunch Break Logistic Intern Village 1400-1430 Lukani Village Drive Kilolo to Lukani and spend time at one river; Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Tanzania Work Plan FY 2018 Project Year 7
    Tanzania Work Plan FY 2018 Project Year 7 October 2017–September 2018 ENVISION is a global project led by RTI International in partnership with CBM International, The Carter Center, Fred Hollows Foundation, Helen Keller International, IMA World Health, Light for the World, Sightsavers, and World Vision. ENVISION is funded by the US Agency for International Development under cooperative agreement No. AID-OAA-A-11-00048. The period of performance for ENVISION is September 30, 2011, through September 30, 2019. The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the US Agency for International Development or the United States Government. ENVISION Project Overview The US Agency for International Development (USAID)’s ENVISION project (2011–2019) is designed to support the vision of the World Health Organization (WHO) and its member states by targeting the control and elimination of seven neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), including lymphatic filariasis (LF), onchocerciasis (OV), schistosomiasis (SCH), three soil-transmitted helminths (STH; roundworm, whipworm, and hookworm), and trachoma. ENVISION’s goal is to strengthen NTD programming at global and country levels and support ministries of health (MOHs) to achieve their NTD control and elimination goals. At the global level, ENVISION—in close coordination and collaboration with WHO, USAID, and other stakeholders—contributes to several technical areas in support of global NTD control and elimination goals, including the following: • Drug and diagnostics procurement, where global donation programs are unavailable • Capacity strengthening • Management and implementation of ENVISION’s Technical Assistance Facility (TAF) • Disease mapping • NTD policy and technical guideline development • NTD monitoring and evaluation (M&E).
    [Show full text]
  • Finscope Tanzania 2017
    20 IRINGA REPORT FinScope Tanzania 2017 FinScope Tanzania 2017: Iringa Regional Report171 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was made possible in partnership with the Bank of Tanzania, Ministry of Finance and Planning, National Bureau of Statistics, Office of Chief Government Statistician-Zanzibar as well as representatives of financial service providers and other regulators. Special recognition is given to Professor Mohammed Warsame, chair of the FinScope Tanzania 2017 Steering Committee and his vice-chair, Dr. Blandina Kilama, as well as the chair of the Technical Committee Dr. Deogratius Macha. Data collection was carried out by Ipsos Tanzania and the Technical Advisory was under Yakini Development Consulting. The complementary qualitative research in Iringa was carried out by Cyril Chimilila, Felic Chengula and Gervas Kahemela. The report was written by Cyril Chimilila, Dr. Amos Ibrahim, Felix Chengula, Elvis Table of Contents Mushi, Julia Seifert and Sosthenes Kewe, edited by Lou Simpson, Neema Mosha and published by the Financial Sector Deepening Trust (FSDT). 1. INTRODUCTION 2. METHODOLOGY 2A: SAMPLING DESIGN 2B: KEY SAMPLING STATISTICS 3. FINDINGS 3A: DEMOGRAPHICS 3B. ADDRESSABILITY 3C: FINANCIAL BEHAVIOUR: 3D: FINANCIAL INCLUSION 3E: USAGE CONCLUSION 3 2 FinScope Tanzania 2017: Iringa Regional Report FinScope Tanzania 2017: Iringa Regional Report S B 9,459 ACHIEVED SAMPLE 1 Introduction In 2014, the National Financial Inclusion Framework (NFIF) set the stage for a national The survey has five main objectives: financial inclusion vision with goals for concrete improvements in the lives of all Tanzanians through improved access and use of financial services. The framework galvanized all • To understand the behaviour (cash flow management, investing, saving relevant stakeholders in financial services under one common vision of success and etc.) and define the financial service needs of consumers (individuals, provided strategic direction for all initiatives for financial inclusion in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • The United Republic of Tanzania Prime Minister’S Office Regional Administration and Local Governmet
    THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA PRIME MINISTER’S OFFICE REGIONAL ADMINISTRATION AND LOCAL GOVERNMET MAFINGA TOWN COUNCIL FIVE YEARS STRATEGIC PLAN (2015/2016 - 2019/2020) TOWN DIRECTOR, P.O. BOX 76, MAFINGA, TANZANIA. TEL.026-2772393 FAX: 026-2772070 EMAIL:[email protected] AUGUST 2017 Abbreviations and Acronyms MDGs Millennium Development Goals NSGRP National Strategy For Growth and Reduction of Poverty MKUKUTA Mkakati wa Kukuza Uchumi na Kupunguza Umaskini CCM Chama Cha Mapinduzi PMO-RALG Prime Minister’s Office –Regional Administration and Local Government LGRP Local Government Reform Programme D by D Decentralisation by Devolution LGAs Local Government Authorities MDAs Ministries ,Independent Departments and Executive Agencies DC District Commissioner HIV Human Immune Virus AIDS Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome RS Regional Secretariat LGMD Local Government Management Data Base MoEVT Ministry of Education and Vocational Training MoHSW Ministry of Health and Social Welfare MAFSC Ministry of Agriculture, Food Security and Cooperatives PEDP Primary Education Development Programme OPRAS Open Performance and Review Appraisal System MTEF Medium Term Expenditure Framework MIS Management Information System LGCDG Local Government Capital Development Grant OM Operation and Maintenance O & OD Opportunity and Obstacles for Development HFs Health facilities NMS National Minimum Standards PMTCT Prevention of Mother to Child Transmission MTC strategic plan 2016/2017-2020/2021 2 Revised, December2017 ANC Antenatal care ITNs Insecticide Treated
    [Show full text]