RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT IRINGA DISTRICT

Technical Assistance to Support the Development of Irrigation and Rural Roads Infrastructure Project (IRRIP2)

December 2017 This document was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by CDM Smith for the Technical Assistance to Support the Development of Irrigation and Rural Roads Infrastructure Project, Task Order number AID-621-TO- 12-00002, under the USAID Global A&E IQC (Contract No.: EDH-I-00-08-00023-00).

February 2013

This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by CDM International Inc.

OCTOBER 2012

This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by CDM International Inc. RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT IRINGA DISTRICT

Technical Assistance to Support the Development of Irrigation and Rural Roads Infrastructure Project (IRRIP2)

Prepared by: Richard Mwakasitu, Roads Component Lead Keith F. Williams, P.E., Chief of Party Organization: CDM International, Inc. (CDM Smith) Submitted to: Boniphace Marwa, United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) USAID Contract No.: EDH-I-00-08-00023-00, Task Order AID-621-TO-12-00002 Report Date: 06 December 2017

DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION ...... 4

1.1 Project Overview...... 4 1.1.1 Overall FTF Goals and Objectives ...... 4 1.1.2 FTF Project Activities ...... 4 1.1.3 IRRIP2 Goals, Objective and Expected Results ...... 4 1.1.4 Rural Roads Infrastructure ...... 5 1.2 Iringa District Rural Roads Prioritization Context...... 5

2 DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION ...... 5

3 DISTRICT POTENTIAL...... 5

3.1 The Midland Zone ...... 5 3.2 The Lowland Zone ...... 6

4 ROAD NETWORK DESCRIPTION ...... 6

4.1 Socio-economic Role ...... 6 4.2 Traffic ...... 6 4.3 Description of Roads...... 6 4.4 Drainage Structures ...... 7

5 ROAD PRIORITIZATION PROCESS...... 7

5.1 Training on the Prioritization Tool ...... 7 5.2 Approaches to the Prioritization Process ...... 7 5.3 Selection of the Road Segments ...... 8 5.4 Traffic Counts...... 8 5.5 Data Collection...... 8 5.6 Prioritization Tool Layout and Format ...... 8 5.7 Criteria used in the Prioritization Process ...... 8 5.7.1 Road Network Connectivity...... 8 5.7.2 Population ...... 9 5.7.3 Current Transport Demand ...... 9 5.7.4 Relevance to Agricultural Development ...... 9 5.7.5 Access to Social Services ...... 9 5.7.6 Road Condition...... 9 5.7.7 Cost Estimates...... 9 5.8 Prioritization Tool Application...... 10 5.9 Prioritization Tool Output ...... 10 5.10 Selected Major Bridges...... 11

RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT IRINGA DISTRICT i 6 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...... 12

ANNEXES Annex A Data Collection Forms Annex B Tool Workings and Output Annex C Cost Estimates Annex D Location Map

TABLES Table 4.1: Road Network Distribution by Classification and Surface Type...... 6 Table 5.1: Prioritization Ranking...... 11 Table 5.2: List of Major Bridges ...... 11

RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT IRINGA DISTRICT ii Acronyms and Abbreviations

ADT Average daily traffic CM Council Manager - TARURA DROMAS District roads maintenance system FARIL Fixed Amount Reimbursement Implementation Letter FtF Feed the Future (a USAID food security initiative) GoT Government of IRRIP2 Irrigation and Rural Roads Infrastructure Project 2 km Kilometer km/hr Kilometers per hour LGA Local government authority LGV Light goods vehicle MCC Manual classified count MGV Medium goods vehicle MT Motorized traffic NMT Non-motorized traffic NPV Net present value PQM Project Quality Management RRDP Rural Roads Development Project RUC Road user cost SOAG Strategic Objective Grant Agreement TANROADS Tanzania National Roads Agency TARURA Tanzania Rural and Urban Roads Agency TZS Tanzanian Shilling USAID United States Agency for International Development USD United States Dollars vpd Vehicles per day

RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT IRINGA DISTRICT iii 1 INTRODUCTION This report documents the status of Iringa District’s efforts to identify and prioritize rural roads within their network for inclusion in the “Rural Roads Development Project” rehabilitation activities included under the Irrigation and Rural Roads Infrastructure Project (IRRIP), funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).

1.1 Project Overview On July 26, 2005, the United States of America, acting through USAID and the Government of the United Republic of Tanzania (GoT), through the Ministry of Finance executed Strategic Objective Grant Agreement (SOAG) Number 12 for Incomes of Small Farmers Increased in Selected Agricultural Commodity Sub-Sectors. To achieve that Objective, the Parties agreed to work together under the Feed the Future (FTF) initiative to achieve the following Results: (1) Increased production of selected agricultural commodities and (2) Increased access to markets in selected community agricultural commodities. 1.1.1 Overall FTF Goals and Objectives The overall FTF goals and objectives are:  Developing the rice sector to spur growth;  Increasing food security through improved productivity, processing, transport, and storage in maize and rice sectors; and  Improving nutritional status of Tanzanians through the development of the horticulture sector. 1.1.2 FTF Project Activities Among the activities to be implemented under the FTF initiatives are:  IRRIP: IRRIP1 (engineering services) and IRRIP2 (technical assistance)  Focus Value Chains for Staples (rice and maize) and Horticulture  Food Processing  Nutrition  Policy Reforms  Research and Training  Monitoring and Evaluation 1.1.3 IRRIP2 Goals, Objective and Expected Results The IRRIP2 activity has its own goals, objectives and expected results. These are:  Expanded access to markets: FTF Target is to rehabilitate at least 1,000 km of rural roads  Improved and sustainable increase in irrigated agricultural productivity: FTF target is to add 47,000 ha of irrigated area through 7 smallholder schemes in Morogoro and Zanzibar (IRRIP1 + IRRIP2)  Increased capacity of Government authorities involved in irrigation and rural roads infrastructure

RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT IRINGA DISTRICT 4 1.1.4 Rural Roads Infrastructure Under IRRIP2 through Rural Roads Development Project (RRDP), approximately 1,000 km of strategic rural roads are planned to be rehabilitated and upgraded. These roads are:  Collector and feeder roads in three districts of Iringa, Kilolo, and Mufindi District Councils in .  Collector and feeder road in four districts of Chunya, Kyela, Mbeya and Rungwe District Councils in Mbeya Region.

1.2 Iringa District Rural Roads Prioritization Context Iringa district has a total core road network of 1,684.3 out of these 420km are under Tanzania National Roads Agency (TANROADS) and the remaining 1264.3 km are under the jurisdiction of Iringa District Council. Roadworthiness during the rainy season is the measure of the effectiveness of the road network. 81 percent of the district’s total road network is impassable throughout the year while 19 percent is passable greater part of the year. Apart from tarmac and gravel roads, earth roads with sand soil texture of low water retention capacity during rainy season. The roads quality within the district vicinity is mostly ranked well, whereas most of them are earth roads and hence regular maintenance is required to easy transportation of goods and services to rural areas of the District. Road of 52 km connecting Mapogoro and Msembe is the longest road link while road of 4 km connecting Ifunda and Isupilo is the shortest. Approximately 1,000 km of roads will be designed for being rehabilitated and upgraded for all the seven districts under RRDP in Iringa and Mbeya Regions. This means that only part of Iringa District road network can be covered by the project thus requiring a prioritization process to identify a priority list of roads.

2 DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION Iringa District is one of the five Districts in Iringa region others being Kilolo, Mufindi, Mafinga township and Iringa municipal. Iringa District has a total population of about 259,113 (according to year 2012 census projection) 125,708 people being male and 133,405 females. The District covers a total area of 20,576 square km. It has 6 Divisions, 28 wards and 129 villages.

3 DISTRICT POTENTIAL Iringa district is potential for agriculture, livestock keeping, fishing and game controlled area where tourist hunting is carried out. The district climate varies with altitude and is closely associated with two distinctive landscape zones namely the midland and the lowlands.

3.1 The Midland Zone This zone is found in Mlolo, Kiponzelo, Kalenga divisions, Nduli and Kihogorota wards in Ismani division, characterized by an undulating topography with scattered mountain hills and plateau at an altitude of 1,200 meters and 1,600 meters above the sea level. The District experiences moderate mean rainfalls, ranging from 600 mm and 1,000 mm annually with mean temperature being 15oC– 20oC. Most of the soils in this zone have high nutrient contents and are considered suitable for a wide range of food and cash crops and therefore have the potential for profitable cultivation. The main crops grown in this zone include tobacco, sunflowers, maize, simsim, vegetables such as onions, carrot, cabbages and tomatoes, beans, cowpeas, sorghum and fruits

RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT IRINGA DISTRICT 5 including mangoes, guava and pawpaw. The zone is also suitable for livestock keeping including dairy and beef cattle, pigs, poultry, goats and sheep.

3.2 The Lowland Zone The Zone comprises of Pawaga, Idodi and Isimani divisions and lies between altitudes 900 and 1,200 meters above the sea level. It is semi-arid or commonly known as the marginal area, due to low mean rainfalls which range from 500 mm – 600 mm and relatively hot with temperatures ranging between 20oC – 25oC, of which the higher temperatures are experienced from September to October. The zone has very rich soils suitable for agriculture but the agricultural production level is low due to unreliable rainfall. Therefore, farmers depend mainly on irrigated farms along Ruaha River and Mtera Dam using traditional and improved schemes and canals. Crops grown in this zone include paddy, cotton, millet, cassava, groundnuts, bananas, onions, tomatoes and fruits such as mangoes, oranges and pawpaw.

4 ROAD NETWORK DESCRIPTION

4.1 Socio-economic Role The roads are mainly used to transport crops from villages and agricultural production areas to market centers. The roads also provide access to social and economic services (i.e. schools, dispensaries, health centers and District hospital).

4.2 Traffic The estimated traffic is less than 300vpd for urban roads (Iringa urban roads) and in rural areas traffic is less than 100 vpd. The number of vehicles increase depending on the season. The peak number of vehicle is experienced during harvesting period.

4.3 Description of Roads More than 89% of these roads are of earth standard with fair and poor condition. The District roads are characterized by slippery, black cotton soil and red soil at both low land area and high land also experiences landslides at highland areas causing slippery condition, ruts and potholes and hence increase travel time, hindering comfortability to the travelers and increased vehicles maintenance’s cost. Table 4.1: Road Network Distribution by Classification and Surface Type Percentage Percentage by Road by Surface Road S/N Classification Surface Type Length (km) type Classification Paved 1.73 0.4% Gravel 55 12.5% Earth 157.89 35.9% 1 Collector Roads Sub-total 214.62 48.8% Paved 2.64 0.6% Gravel 39.54 9.0% Earth 152.78 34.7% 2 Feeder Roads Sub-total 194.96 44.3% Paved 0.4 0.1% Gravel 8.9 2.0% Community and Earth 21.3 4.8% 3 Urban Roads Sub-total 30.6 6.9% TOTAL NETWORK 440.18 100.0% 100.0%

RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT IRINGA DISTRICT 6 4.4 Drainage Structures The assessment conducted during the prioritization process revealed that most of roads require new drainage structures such as box culverts and pipe culverts. Most of these culverts are 7m. A few existing drainage structures need to be either replaced or repaired to improve their drainage function. No major bridges are expected along any of the road segments.

A major bridge to be considered is Mlambalasi Bridge along Nzihi – Mlambalasi - Kiwere Road having span of 30m crossing Ruaha River. The Bridge is necessary to be constructed to ensure connectivity for the whole road section. The road creates a reliable access to an existing irrigation scheme with a high potential of large scale paddy farming.

5 ROAD PRIORITIZATION PROCESS Generally, prioritization aims at ranking interventions in a priority order that reflects their net contribution to economic welfare. In the language of economic appraisal, this means (for example) ranking in order of net present value (NPV) divided by cost. With the assistance of IRRIP team, for each LGA the TARURA Council Managers will be responsible for designing the road improvements and producing the tender documents. The Prioritization process consisted of the following main activities: i. Training on the Prioritization Tool ii. Selection of the road segments from the District road network iii. Conducting traffic counts iv. Collection of field data such as rapid road condition assessment; cost estimates and collection of social economic information. v. Analysis of data by use of the prioritization tool

5.1 Training on the Prioritization Tool IRRIP2 has developed a comprehensive, but simple and robust system for prioritizing rural road maintenance and rehabilitation interventions. The tool was developed to conduct a prioritization process based on a wider range of more quantifiable criteria. On 13th to 14th July 2017, IRRP team conducted training on the utilization of prioritization tool to the Council Managers (CMs) and their subordinates from Iringa, Kilolo and Mufindi in Iringa Region together with Chunya, Kyela, Mbeya and Rungwe from Mbeya Region. During the training, participants could grasp knowledge on the following items: i. Tool layout and format ii. Approaches to the prioritization process iii. Criteria used in the prioritization process iv. Collection of relevant information required for the tool including road condition assessment, cost estimates, traffic counts and socio-economic information. v. Tool workings and output

5.2 Approaches to the Prioritization Process Approaches to the prioritization process included the following: -  Ranking interventions in a priority order that reflects contribution to economic welfare i.e. net present value divided by cost.  A prioritization process which has intention of making road improvements with the impact of boosting the welfare of road Users. Prioritization should be in such a way that the roads with high positive impact to road users are ranked high.

RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT IRINGA DISTRICT 7  Saving in Road user costs(RUCs) are compared with change in estimated road agency costs (RACs)

5.3 Selection of the Road Segments Based on the district priority list, 27 road segments with a total length of 489km were selected for prioritization process. Criteria used in selecting the roads totaling 489km out of the district network of 1,264.31 km were: i. All areas with potential for agricultural production; and ii. Rural roads serving more population to access social services such as health centers and schools.

5.4 Traffic Counts Traffic counts were done in two-way ADT from 7-day x 12 h using standard DROMAS traffic count forms. The traffic count was conducted by road enumerators in 12-hour shifts from 6:00 am to 6:00 pm over 7 days for all selected roads.

5.5 Data Collection Data collected were categorized in two groups: i. Socio-economic related data which includes ward population, traffic volume, warehouses, markets, education/health facilities and relevance to agricultural development; and ii. Data related to road condition. These includes road classification, road length, number of days the road is impassable, current road condition and transit speed, and estimated total cost for improvement. Information like ward population, warehouses, markets, education / health facilities, relevance to agricultural development, road classification, road length and estimated number of days the road is impassable were compiled from office records and verified in the field. Information like traffic volume, road condition and estimated costs were collected from field work. Data collection was divided in two forms namely Form No 01 for socio-economic related data and Form No 02 for road condition related data. The completed forms are included in Annex A.

5.6 Prioritization Tool Layout and Format The tool is built in a Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet containing the Data, Workings, Lockups tables and Ranking List. It is only in the Data sheet where input variables are done and editing process enabled.

5.7 Criteria used in the Prioritization Process The prioritization tool is built such that the following criteria are used to calculate the total economic benefits expected to be generated after the road improvements: 5.7.1 Road Network Connectivity This includes all selected road segments in the LGAs showing road names, road Classification, and Road Length.

RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT IRINGA DISTRICT 8 Consideration was given to roads that are connected to arterial roads i.e. Trunk, Regional Roads and well-maintained Collector Roads. 5.7.2 Population Ward Population served by each road segment was taken and if the road traverses in more than one ward the summation of the population of the served wards were adopted.

Population data was collected from the District Planning Office. 5.7.3 Current Transport Demand Classified traffic counts were conducted for seven days from 03rd August to 09th August 2017 on each road segment. The decision on whether the recorded traffic is High, Medium or Low is made inside the prioritization tool.

The percentages of pedestrians and cycles carrying Loads were also recorded. 5.7.4 Relevance to Agricultural Development Relevance to agricultural potential was measured High, Medium or Low depending on the type and quantity of crops produced in areas services by a road segment. Areas with high production of cereal crops such as maize and rice were ranked high together with areas with irrigation schemes, warehouses, large market centers and areas where other FTF projects are present.

Agricultural information was collected from the District Agriculture Irrigation and Cooperatives Department. 5.7.5 Access to Social Services Existence of any social services like Secondary Schools or Colleges and Hospitals or Health Centers contributes to the total benefits of improving a road segment. Primary schools and dispensaries were not counted as they do not contribute any difference in the benefits generated.

Information on existence of secondary schools along the road segments was obtained from the Education Department while that for health facilities was obtained from the Health Department within the LGA. 5.7.6 Road Condition Road condition assessment was conducted for each road segment and recorded as Poor, Fair, or Good. All earth roads were categorized as poor regardless of the visibly good condition during the dry season.

An estimate of the number of days per year the road is impassable to anything larger than motor-cycle was done for each road segment.

Average transit speed in km/hr was estimated through speeding along the roads segments and using historical information. 5.7.7 Cost Estimates. Preliminary cost estimates for all the road segments were done after collection of the field data and proposing the necessary interventions for improvement of the roads to gravel standard. Major Low Volume Roads activities of work included but not limited to:  Clearing and grubbing  Road Formation

RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT IRINGA DISTRICT 9  Fill and Cross fill  Gravel wearing course  Installation of drainage structures such as pipe and box culverts, solid and vented drifts  Excavation of open drains like catch water and miter  Construction of gabions protection works where necessary

After determining the cost for major activities, a percentage was added for preliminaries and general items. The final cost for each road was converted to ‘000 USD at an exchange rate of TZS 2,200. The summary of cost estimates is presented in Annex C.

5.8 Prioritization Tool Application The prioritization tool developed under IRRIP2 was used to generate the priority index for each road. The priority index (benefits/km/year÷cost/km) incorporates the following five elements: i. conventional RUC benefits to motorized traffic because of reduced IRI roughness arising from rehabilitation; ii. conventional RUC benefits to non-motorized traffic because of reduced IRI roughness on days when the road is passable; iii. on days when the road in its current condition is impassable (to all except non- motorized traffic and motor-cycles), the benefits of rehabilitation are a switch of mode from load-carrying motor-cycles to MGVs and a switch from loaded cycles and pedestrians to LGVs; iv. the transport benefit of high or medium agricultural potential is taken as similar in concept to generated (or “induced”) traffic (additional traffic in a corridor arising from a reduction of transport costs). For areas of high agricultural potential, the generated traffic is the fleet of MGVs needed to transport an additional 5t/ha x 200ha/km of road, each MGV assumed to have a 3t payload. For areas of medium potential the additional yield is 3t/ha and the area taken as 100ha/km. The agricultural benefit is the RUC saving of an MGV x veh-km traveling on a good as opposed to a poor road, with 50 percent added for agricultural inputs, etc. and v. a social trip purpose benefit. This is taken as additional household trips (i.e. generated traffic) arising from rehabilitation. The population per km of road is rated as low (up to 1,500 people/km), medium (1,500-2,500/km) or high (>2,500/km) and each person is assumed to make five return trips per year in a small bus (dala-dala or equivalent) carrying ten passengers. As with agricultural benefits, the generated traffic benefit of additional household trips is the RUC saving of a small bus x veh-km traveled on a good as opposed to a poor road. This benefit can be scaled up to reflect the existence of a hospital or secondary school along the road.

5.9 Prioritization Tool Output The prioritization tool output is as summarized in the table 5.2 below having 27 roads in the prioritization process, the highest ranked road is Kalenga - Kiponzero road with priority index of 1.04 and the lowest is Udumka - Mfukulenge road with priority index of 0.15 Details of the prioritization tool workings and output are presented in Annex B The roads were arranged in descending order of their prioritization ranking indexes as listed in the table below:

RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT IRINGA DISTRICT 10 Table 5.1: Prioritization Ranking Rank of Road Class Length Index Index Ward Road Name (km) Score 1 Ulanda and Maboga Kalenga - Kiponzelo Collector 31.6 1.04 2 Nzihi and Kipera Nzihi -Mlambalasi - Kiwere Collector 22.5 1.02 3 Kalenga and Kiwere Kalenga - Mgera Collector 14.7 0.93 Mlowa, Mlenge and 4 Kimande Mbuyuni - Mlowa Collector 40.2 0.86 Mseke , Lamgungwe 5 and Mgama Wenda - Mgama Collector 19.0 0.85 6 Wasa and Maboga Kiponzelo- Wasa Collector 25.2 0.80 7 Wasa Wasa -Ulata Feeder 20.6 0.74 8 Nzihi and Mlowa Mafuruto - Nyamahana Collector 25.8 0.69 9 Mgama Ibumila - Ilandutwa Feeder 14.3 0.69 10 Lumuli Isupilo - Ulete Collector 29.3 0.69 Mgama - Ilandutwa - 11 Mgama and Ifunda Udumuka Collector 22.6 0.65 Mgama and Mgama - Itwaga - 12 Lyamgungwe. Lupembelwasenga Feeder 11.6 0.64 13 Ifunda Ifunda - Udumuka Collector 19.4 0.51 14 Luhota and Mseke, Tagamenda-Ugwachanya Collector 23.1 0.60 15 Magulilwa and Luhota Magulilwa - Mlanda Feeder 10.8 0.48 16 Maboga and Nzihi. Ibogo - Igangidung'u Feeder 8.8 0.49 17 Ifunda Kibena - Mfukulembe Collector 11.2 0.47 Igula – Luhota Sekondari - 18 Luhota. Nyabula feeder 10.8 0.46 19 Mseke and Kalenga Wenda - Tosamaganga Collector 7.4 0.45 20 Kiwere and Kising’a Kiwere - Igingilanyi Collector 19.9 0.45 21 Kalenga and Ulanda Tosamaganga - Weru Feeder 10.6 0.30 22 Maboga and Idodi Makombe - Kitanewa Collector 22.5 0.28 Magulilwa and 23 Lyamgungwe Ndiwili - Ng'enza Collector 21.2 0.27 Mkungugu -Ikengeza - 24 Nyang’oro and Kising’a Nyangoro Collector 22.9 0.25 25 Mgama and Ifunda Ilandutwa - Ifunda Feeder 7.2 0.25 26 Kalenga and Ulanda Tosamaganga -Ibangamoyo Collector 5.7 0.21 27 Ifunda Udumka - Mfukulembe Collector 10.2 0.15 TOTAL 489.0

5.10 Selected Major Bridges Major bridges are proposed to be treated as separate projects due to their complexity and high costs. For Iringa District, one bridge is proposed to be constructed along Nzihi – Mlambalasi – Kiwere Road. Details of the bridge are as listed in the table below. Table 5.2: List of Major Bridges Location (Road Estimated Span Proposed Cost Estimate No Bridge Name name) (m) Bridge Type (USD) Nzihi – Mlambalasi 1 Mlambalasi bridge – Kiwere ch. 5+200 30 ACROW bridge 700,000

RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT IRINGA DISTRICT 11 6 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS According to the weights allocated to the criteria, the tool gives highest priority to the roads accessing FTF projects, i.e. areas with irrigation schemes, agricultural productive areas with warehouses, millers etc. Areas with high production of rice, maize, hot culture, tea and coffee are also regarded to have high agricultural potential and score high ranking benefits as compared to other areas. Comments are sought on the following recommendations: i. If the agreement reached in the June 2017 Project Initiation Workshop persists, after the prioritization is done, the list of roads as shown in Table 5.1 will be basis for Development Partners to select the number of road segments and length depending on the available financial resources. ii. Upon approval and selection of the road segments, TARURA Iringa Council will conduct detailed engineering design with the support of IRRIP team. Designs are planned to commence in November 2017 and expected to be completed within five months to allow procurement of contractors to be done between April and June 2018, and construction works to commence in July 2018 iii. Agreement is expected to be reached between USAID, Development Partners and Iringa LGA on the scope of works for the road segments to be selected from the prioritized list.

RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT IRINGA DISTRICT 12 ANNEXES Annex A Data Collection Forms Annex B Tool Workings and Output Annex C Cost Estimates Annex D Location Map

RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT IRINGA DISTRICT Annex A Data Collection Forms

Form No 01: Socio-Economic Data District: IRINGA Data Compiled By: ASEL KAJANGE Date: 24 OCTOBER 2017 Educational/ Traffic Distribution Relevance to agricultural development health facilities Ward Non- No Road Name Motorized % Hospital pop. Motorized % ped. Sec. Traffic cycles / Health Rating Reasons Traffic school veh/day Center Cycles Ped. loaded loaded (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) 1 Tagamenda- 30,491 44 284 156 33% 17% 1 0 H Irrigation Scheme/ Horticulture Ugwachanya 2 Wenda - Mgama 39,039 37 273 375 28% 14% 1 1 H Large scale maize farming 3 Mgama - Ilandutwa - 25,260 5 53 630 7% 1% 1 1 H Large scale maize farming Udumuka 4 Wenda - 23,292 7 168 284 20% 12% 1 1 H Large scale maize farming Tosamaganga 5 Tosamaganga - 16,548 9 79 106 17% 5.1% 1 1 H Irrigation Scheme/ Horticulture Ibangamoyo 6 Nzihi -Mlambalasi - 25,146 49 372 820 42% 6.2% 1 1 H Large scale paddy farming Kiwere 7 Kalenga - Mgera 17,077 72 635 834 1% 1% 1 1 H Irrigation Scheme/ Horticulture 8 Isupilo - Ulete 8,011 56 382 474 11% 2% 1 0 L Small scale maize farming 9 Kalenga - Kiponzelo 20,001 34 132 684 4% 1% 1 1 H Large scale maize farming 10 Kiponzelo- Wasa 23,706 29 356 368 12% 7% 1 1 H Irrigation Scheme/ Horticulture 11 Mbuyuni - Mlowa 34,040 33 130 109 57% 2% 1 1 H Large scale paddy farming 12 Kiwere - Igingilanyi 18,181 20 211 195 7% 2% 1 0 H Large scale maize farming 13 Mkungugu -Ikengeza - 18,216 20 108 83 18% 4% 1 0 H Large scale maize farming Nyangoro 14 Ifunda - Udumuka 12,445 12 318 102 16% 0% 1 0 H Large scale maize farming 15 Kibena - Mfukulembe 12,445 17 159 257 17.3% 8% 1 0 H Large scale maize farming 16 Udumka - Mfukulembe 12,445 3 66 61 0.0% 0.0% 1 0 H Large scale maize farming 17 Ibogo - Igangidung'u 28,070 19 258 359 20.2% 6.5% 1 0 M Medium scale maize farming 18 Makombe - Kitanewa 22,572 23 76 387 24.1% 2.8% 1 0 M Medium scale paddy farming 19 Magulilwa - Mlanda 28,217 17 230 231 15.3% 1.2% 1 0 H Large scale maize farming 20 Ilandutwa - Ifunda 25,260 4 166 79 34.1% 6.9% 1 1 H Large scale maize farming

RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT IRINGA DISTRICT 21 Ibumila - Ilandutwa 12,815 17 650 320 12.7% 6.7% 1 1 H Large scale maize farming 22 Mgama - Itwaga - 22,849 10 178 393 12.4% 3.1% 1 1 H Large scale maize farming Lupembelwasenga 23 Tosamaganga - Weru 16,548 2 275 159 18.7% 5.5% 1 1 M Medium scale maize farming 24 Mafuruto - 24,847 15 275 364 17% 15% 1 1 H Large scale paddy farming Nyamahana 25 Igula - Sekondari - 14,302 23 336 510 9% 12% 1 0 H Large scale maize farming Nyabula 26 Wasa -Ulata 10,809 10 301 340 23% 18% 1 0 H Large scale maize farming 27 Ndiwili - Ng'enza 23,949 8 80 117 23% 9% 1 0 H Large scale maize farming

RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT IRINGA DISTRICT Form No 02: Road Condition Related Data District: IRINGA Data Compiled By: ASEL KAJANGE Date: 24 OCTOBER 2017 Road condition if no Road Length Days improvement Estimated condition No Road Name km impassable Transit Speed Assessment Total Cost after km/hr US$ '000 improvement (1) (2) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) 1 Tagamenda-Ugwachanya 19.40 0 30 Poor 469 Good 2 Wenda - Mgama 19.00 0 40 Poor 484 Good 3 Mgama - Ilandutwa - Udumuka 22.64 90 30 Poor 602 Good 4 Wenda - Tosamaganga 7.40 0 30 Poor 260 Good 5 Tosamaganga -Ibangamoyo 5.70 0 20 Poor 229 Good 6 Nzihi -Mlambalasi - Kiwere 22.50 70 20 Poor 721 Good 7 Kalenga - Mgera 14.70 90 25 Poor 571 Good 8 Isupilo - Ulete 29.30 90 30 Poor 900 Good 9 Kalenga - Kiponzelo 31.60 0 30 Poor 793 Good 10 Kiponzelo- Wasa 25.20 0 30 Poor 704 Good 11 Mbuyuni - Mlowa 40.19 45 20 Poor 1017 Good 12 Kiwere - Igingilanyi 19.90 0 30 Poor 592 Good 13 Mkungugu -Ikengeza - Nyangoro 22.90 0 30 Poor 660 Good 14 Ifunda - Udumuka 23.07 0 20 Poor 580 Good 15 Kibena - Mfukulembe 11.20 0 20 Poor 323 Good 16 Udumka - Mfukulembe 18.25 0 20 Poor 323 Good 17 Ibogo - Igangidung'u 10.75 0 20 Poor 424 Good 18 Makombe - Kitanewa 22.50 120 20 Poor 884 Good 19 Magulilwa - Mlanda 8.84 70 20 Poor 263 Good 20 Ilandutwa - Ifunda 7.21 90 20 Poor 282 Good 21 Ibumila - Ilandutwa 14.25 120 30 Poor 449 Good 22 Mgama - Itwaga - Lupembelwasenga 11.60 0 20 Poor 338 Good 23 Tosamaganga - Weru 10.60 120 20 Poor 382 Good 24 Mafuruto - Nyamahana 25.75 70 20 Poor 660 Good 25 Igula - Sekondari - Nyabula/ 10.80 90 20 Poor 494 Good 26 Wasa -Ulata 20.60 0 25 Poor 431 Good 27 Ndiwili - Ng'enza 21.23 0 30 Poor 550 Good

RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT IRINGA DISTRICT Annex B Tool Workings and Output

RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT IRINGA DISTRICT Rural roads prioritization - Workings and results IRINGA DISTRICT Benefit estimates (rounded) in US$/km/year Conventional Mode switch Access Pop. Est Road RUC savings benefits to Priority Road Band cost condition Agric Basic school index = Rank Rank Classi- per US$ impro- From From pot social or Total ben of total of Ward Road Name fication km km per km vement MT NMT MC NMT benefits access health Benefits ÷cost benefit index (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) Luhota, Tagamenda- From Poor Collector 19.4 M 25,300 1,550 11,810 0 0 740 530 530 15,160 0.599 16 13 Mseke Ugwachanya to Good Mseke, Wenda - From Poor Lyamgungwe Collector 19.0 M 25,500 1,300 17,930 0 0 740 530 1,060 21,560 0.845 7 5 Mgama to Good ,Mgama Mgama - Mgama, From Poor Ilandutwa - Collector 22.6 L 26,600 180 14,880 10 60 1,470 260 520 17,380 0.653 14 11 Ifunda to Good Udumuka Mseke, Wenda - From Poor Collector 7.4 H 35,100 250 12,590 0 0 740 790 1,580 15,950 0.454 15 19 Kalenga Tosamaganga to Good Kalenga, Tosamaganga From Poor Collector 5.7 H 40,200 320 5,110 0 0 740 790 1,580 8,540 0.212 24 26 Ulanda -Ibangamoyo to Good Nzihi - From Poor Nzihi, Kiwere Mlambalasi - Collector 22.5 L 32,000 1,730 27,030 100 1,670 1,470 260 520 32,780 1.024 2 2 to Good Kiwere Kalenga,Kiw Kalenga - From Poor Collector 14.7 L 38,800 3,010 30,570 180 130 1,470 260 520 36,140 0.931 1 3 ere Mgera to Good From Poor Lumuli Isupilo - Ulete Collector 29.3 L 30,700 2,060 17,780 140 570 0 260 260 21,070 0.686 9 10 to Good Ulanda, Kalenga - From Poor Collector 31.6 L 25,100 1,200 23,350 0 0 740 260 520 26,070 1.039 3 1 Maboga Kiponzelo to Good Maboga,Was Kiponzelo- From Poor Collector 25.2 L 27,900 1,020 19,840 0 0 740 260 520 22,380 0.802 4 6 a Wasa to Good Mlowa, Mbuyuni - From Poor Mlenge, Collector 40.2 L 25,300 1,160 16,670 40 1,750 1,470 260 520 21,870 0.864 5 4 Mlowa to Good Kimande Kiwere, Kiwere - From Poor Collector 19.9 L 29,700 700 11,090 0 0 740 260 260 13,050 0.439 19 20 Kising'a Igingilanyi to Good Mkungugu - Kising'a,Nya From Poor Ikengeza - Collector 22.9 L 28,800 700 5,180 0 0 740 260 260 7,140 0.248 25 24 ng'oro to Good Nyangoro Ifunda - From Poor Ifunda Collector 23.1 L 25,100 420 11,100 0 0 740 260 260 12,780 0.509 20 14 Udumuka to Good Kibena - From Poor Ifunda Collector 11.2 L 28,800 600 11,570 0 0 740 260 260 13,430 0.466 18 17 Mfukulembe to Good

RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT IRINGA DISTRICT Rural roads prioritization - Workings and results IRINGA DISTRICT Benefit estimates (rounded) in US$/km/year Conventional Mode switch Access Pop. Est Road RUC savings benefits to Priority Road Band cost condition Agric Basic school index = Rank Rank Classi- per US$ impro- From From pot social or Total ben of total of Ward Road Name fication km km per km vement MT NMT MC NMT benefits access health Benefits ÷cost benefit index (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) Udumka - From Poor Ifunda Collector 10.2 L 31,800 110 3,470 0 0 740 260 260 4,840 0.152 27 27 Mfukulembe to Good Maboga, Ibogo - From Poor Collector 10.8 H 39,400 670 17,070 0 0 180 790 790 19,500 0.495 10 15 Nzihi Igangidung'u to Good Maboga, Makombe - From Poor Collector 22.5 L 39,300 810 8,890 80 370 370 260 260 11,040 0.281 21 22 Idodi Kitanewa to Good Magulilwa, Magulilwa - From Poor Feeder 8.8 H 29,800 600 10,200 30 340 1,470 790 790 14,220 0.477 17 16 Luhota Mlanda to Good Mgama, Ilandutwa - From Poor Feeder 7.2 H 39,100 140 4,930 10 710 1,470 790 1,580 9,630 0.246 23 25 Ifunda Ifunda to Good Ibumila - From Poor Mgama Feeder 14.3 L 31,500 600 17,420 60 1,470 1,470 260 520 21,800 0.692 6 9 Ilandutwa to Good Mgama - Mgama, Itwaga - From Poor Feeder 11.6 M 29,100 350 16,020 0 0 740 530 1,060 18,700 0.643 12 12 Lyamgungwe Lupembelwas to Good enga Kalenga, Tosamaganga From Poor Feeder 10.6 M 36,000 70 7,830 10 890 370 530 1,060 10,760 0.299 22 21 Ulanda - Weru to Good Mafuruto - From Poor Nzihi, Mlowa Feeder 25.8 L 25,600 530 14,270 30 680 1,470 260 520 17,760 0.694 13 8 Nyamahana to Good Igula - From Poor Luhota Sekondari - Feeder 10.8 L 45,700 810 17,690 60 670 1,470 260 260 21,220 0.464 8 18 to Good Nyabula From Poor Wasa Wasa -Ulata Feeder 20.6 L 25,800 350 17,380 0 60 740 260 260 19,050 0.738 11 7 to Good Magulilwa, Ndiwili - From Poor Collector 21.2 L 25,900 280 5,460 0 0 740 260 260 7,000 0.270 26 23 Lyamgunwe Ng'enza to Good

RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT IRINGA DISTRICT Annex C Cost Estimates C1: ROADS Cost Total Cost Rank Road Length Estimate Estimate of Ward Road Name Classi- (km) per km (USD) Index fication (USD) 1 Ulanda and Maboga Kalenga - Kiponzelo Collector 31.6 25,100 793,160 Nzihi -Mlambalasi - 2 Nzihi and Kipera Kiwere Collector 22.5 32,000 720,000 3 Kalenga and Kiwere Kalenga - Mgera Collector 14.7 38,800 570,360 Mlowa, Mlenge and 4 Kimande Mbuyuni - Mlowa Collector 40.2 25,300 1,017,060 Mseke , Lamgungwe 5 and Mgama Wenda - Mgama Collector 19.0 25,500 484,500 6 Wasa and Maboga Kiponzelo- Wasa Collector 25.2 27,900 703,080 7 Wasa Wasa -Ulata Feeder 20.6 25,800 531,480 Mafuruto - 8 Nzihi and Mlowa Nyamahana Collector 25.8 25,600 660,480 9 Mgama Ibumila - Ilandutwa Feeder 14.3 31,500 450,450 10 Lumuli Isupilo - Ulete Collector 29.3 30,700 899,510 Mgama - Ilandutwa - 11 Mgama and Ifunda Udumuka Collector 22.6 26,600 601,160 Mgama and Mgama - Itwaga - 12 Lyamgungwe. Lupembelwasenga Feeder 11.6 29,100 337,560 13 Ifunda Ifunda - Udumuka Collector 19.4 25,100 486,940 Tagamenda- 14 Luhota and Mseke, Ugwachanya Collector 23.1 25,500 589,050 15 Magulilwa and Luhota Magulilwa - Mlanda Feeder 10.8 29,800 321,840 16 Maboga and Nzihi. Ibogo - Igangidung'u Feeder 8.8 39,400 346,720 17 Ifunda Kibena - Mfukulembe Collector 11.2 28,800 322,560 Igula – Luhota 18 Luhota. Sekondari - Nyabula feeder 10.8 45,700 493,560 Wenda - 19 Mseke and Kalenga Tosamaganga Collector 7.4 35,100 259,740 20 Kiwere and Kising’a Kiwere - Igingilanyi Collector 19.9 29,700 591,030 21 Kalenga and Ulanda Tosamaganga - Weru Feeder 10.6 36,000 381,600 22 Maboga and Idodi Makombe - Kitanewa Collector 22.5 39,300 884,250 Magulilwa and 23 Lyamgungwe Ndiwili - Ng'enza Collector 21.2 25,900 549,080 Nyang’oro and Mkungugu -Ikengeza - 24 Kising’a Nyangoro Collector 22.9 28,800 659,520 25 Mgama and Ifunda Ilandutwa - Ifunda Feeder 7.2 39,100 281,520 Tosamaganga - 26 Kalenga and Ulanda Ibangamoyo Collector 5.7 40,200 229,140 27 Ifunda Udumka - Mfukulembe Collector 10.2 31,800 324,360 Sub-Total Roads 489.1 14,489,710

C2: BRIDGES Bridge Span Cost Estimate S/N Bridge Name Road Name (m) (USD) 1 Mlambalasi Bridge Nzihi -Mlambalasi - Kiwere 30.0 700,000

Sub-Total Bridges 700,000

GRAND TOTAL 15,189,710

RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT IRINGA DISTRICT Annex D Location Map

RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT IRINGA DISTRICT RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT IRINGA DISTRICT Technical Assistance to Support the Development of Irrigation and Rural Roads Infrastructure Project (IRRIP2)

U.S. Agency for International Development 686 Old Bagamoyo Road, Msasani P.O. Box 9130 February 2013 Dar es Salaam Tanzania RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT This publication wasIRINGA produced DISTRICT for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by CDM International Inc.

February 2013

This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by CDM International Inc.

OCTOBER 2012

This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by CDM International Inc.

OCTOBER 2012

This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by CDM International Inc.