DOCSLIB.ORG

Autoethnography As Constructionist Project Laura L

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Autoethnography As Constructionist Project Laura L Santa Clara University Scholar Commons Women's and Gender Studies College of Arts & Sciences 2008 Autoethnography as Constructionist Project Laura L. Ellingson Santa Clara University, [email protected] Carolyn Ellis Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/gender Part of the Communication Commons, and the Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons Recommended Citation Ellingson, L. L., & Ellis, C. (2008). Autoethnography as constructionist project. In J. A. Holstein, & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 445-465). New York: Guilford. Copyright © 2008 Guilford Press. Reprinted with permission of The uiG lford Press. This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts & Sciences at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Women's and Gender Studies by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ~ THE GUILFORD PRESS New York London Autoethnography as Constructionist __ Project Laura L. Ellingson Carolyn Ellis everal years ago, we published an essay guished by virtue of what they are not." No­ in which we claimed that qualitative re­ where is this evidenced more strongly than Ssearch can be productively thought in the quantitative-qualitative divide. Even of as existing along a continuum. Ai-tistic in qualitative work itself polarities mark the interpretivists anchor one end, whereas sci­ differences between interpretivists and real­ entific positivists hold down the other. In be­ ists (Atkinson, Coffey, Delamont, Lofland, & tween is a vast and varied middle ground Lofland, 2001; Bochner & Ellis, 1999). Re­ wherein most qualitative researchers locate cently autoethnographers have begun to dis­ themselves (Ellis & Ellingson, 2000). We tinguish themselves from one another by constructed a nuanced range of possibilities separating evocative from analytic autoeth­ to describe what many others have socially nography. Analytic autoethnographers fo­ constructed as dichotomies (mutually exclu­ cus on developing theoretical explanations sive, paired opposites), such as art- science, of broader social phenomena, whereas evo­ hard-soft, and qualitative-quantitative (see cative autoethnographers focus on narrative Potter, 1995). Dichotomous thinking re­ presentations that open up conversations mains the default mode of the academy. and evoke emotional responses (Hunt & "Language, and thus meaning, depends on a Junco, 2006). system of differences," explains Gergen When Carolyn invited me (Laura) to coau­ (1994, p. 9). "These differences have been thor this chapter, I accepted with enthusi­ cast in terms of binaries... All are distin- asm, excited to be working with her again. 445 446 11> STRATEGIES AND TECHNIQUES Perusing the Handbook prospectus, I chuck­ covered in my many years of directing led at the irony of the two of us jointly con­ dissertations that the main roadblock for structing a story about the intersections students is that they try to do too much. between autoethnography and social con­ Then they encounter difficulty doing any structionism once again. Those familiar with one thing deeply or thoroughly enough. Carolyn's methodological novel on auto­ Laura was among the very best students I ethnography (Ellis, 2004) might recognize had ever mentored, and I wanted her to suc­ me as the witty, weak-bladdered woman in ceed. Laura persevered, and I guess I Carolyn's qualitative methods seminar. shouldn't have been surprised, given that Whereas Carolyn cheerfully explores my she was as astute at traditional analysis as she bodily weakness to add levity to her story, was talented as a narrative writer, that she her discussion of my dissertation only hints pulled off an excellent dissertation that in­ at the lengthy, intense saga of my negotia­ corporated multiple perspectives and meth­ tion with her and my committee over the ods. In light of our experience, I thought she role autoethnography would play in my would be the perfect coauthor for this chap­ ethnographic construction of an interdisci­ ter. plinary geriatric oncology team. Thankfully, In this chapter, we explore autoethnog­ the story had a happy ending; together we raphy as a social constructionist project. We resisted the art-science dichotomy and em­ want to resist the tendency to dichotomize braced crystallization, a postmodern form of and instead explore how autoethnography methodological tJ.iangulation that utilizes makes connections between seemingly polar multiple methods of analysis and multiple opposites. Though we see it as a sign of prog­ genres of representation (Richardson, ress that authors desire to tease out differ­ 2000). I combined narrative ethnography, ences in autoethnographic projects, we ar­ grounded theory analysis, autoethnography, gue that concentrating on dichotomies is and feminist analyses into a single disser­ counterproductive, given that autoethnog­ tation prqject, now revised into a book raphy by definition operates as a bridge, (Ellingson, 2005a). In this chapter, Carolyn connecting autobiography and ethnography and I continue that conversation, develop­ in order to study the intersection of self and ing our conception of autoethnography as a others, self and culture. constructionist project. After further detailing in this chapter the When I (Carolyn) asked Laura to coau­ limits of dichotomous thinking, we sketch thor this chapter with me, I hesitated at first the meanings and goals of autoethnography. as I thought about how insistent she had We then discuss social constructionist con­ been in her dissertation on including every­ cepts pertinent to autoethnography by de­ thing but "the kitchen sink." She wanted to constructing various methodological dichot­ engage in crystallization and approach the omies. oncology team she studied from a variety of perspectives. Her goal was to illuminate the socially constructed world of the team while The Limits simultaneously revealing the constructed na­ of Dichotomous Thinking ture of her multiple accounts of the team. Yes, perhaps I would have preferred at the I (Laura) often feel! am channeling Carolyn time that Laura do it "my" way. Don't we all when I introduce the continuum of qualita­ want to reproduce ourselves? But I also tive methods to my undergraduate qualita­ pride myself on helping students to find tive students, so tied to our personal rela­ their particular and unique voices, especially tionship is my knowledge of and passion for if they are different from mine. I was leery of qualitative methods. I recall with fondness Laura's proposed project because I've dis- Carolyn's chart of qualitative research with Autoethnography @ 447 the squiggly, broken line down the middle mal channels, such as academic journals, between the art and science sides. "Qualita­ and through informal, interpersonal tive as art and qualitative as science," she interaction with others [ Gergen, 1994]. giys adamantly, "are endpoints of a contin­ Unfortunately, we are so schooled in lium. You have to decide where you want to some ways of thinking that we no longer ibcate yourselves in terms of your identity notice how limiting those mental patterns ind in every research project you do. That can be. There ai·e three ways in which di­ location will determine your goals, the pro­ chotomies limit our thinking. You'll want tedures you use, and the claims you make" to take notes on this and ask me questions (Ellis, 2004, pp. 25-31, 359-363). if you don't understand, since this isn't in \ I address the limits of dichotomous think­ the reading, and it will be on the exam." irig early in my qualitative methods course, tight after introducing social construction­ This last comment brings them to rapt at- ism as the epistemology that underlies the tention, and they poise their pens above iliethodological continuum. "The central their notebooks as I explain. ~remise of social constructionism," I tell stu­ dents, "is that meaning is not inherent. The "First, dichotomies present as opposites i::entral concerns of constructionist inquiry what are actually interdependent. Socially ire to study what people 'know' and how constructed opposites actually depend they create, apply, contest, and act upon upon each other for existence; without these ideas" (Harris, 2006, p. 225). women there would be no men, only peo­ Ci My undergraduate students sit with their ple; without hard, there would be no soft, ~esks arranged in a circle, faces not yet only a single texture. drooping with late-term fatigue but more "Second, dichotomies limit the possibil­ than a few evidencing the mild resentment ities to two and only two, negating t11e $om of taking required courses. I discuss near-infinite possibilities present between fhe politics of the field of qualitative re­ any two poles. Thus we can resist the limi­ iearch and how hotly contested many issues tations of femininity and masculinity as ~-e within the field, referencing their read­ mutually exclusive opposites and imagine frig ofJames Potter (1995). My students look them instead as poles between which at me with naked disbelief when I add with a there are many degrees of androgyny, ~iriile, "And some of us actually care so blended identities, and possible perfor­ (li:eply and passionately about this stuff that mances of sex, gender, and sexuality. W,e have ongoing debates and dialogues and "Finally, when we limit possibilities to fven get mad at each other sometimes!" The only two, one will inevitably be valued ftudents shake their heads, mystified as to over the other. It is not possible to view li_ow anyone could care so much about such the world in terms of equal opposites; one ~h:opic. side is always already privileged." 'fhThen I tell them that making sense of the World through dichotomous thinking is un­ As I finish the $tatement I notice I am lean­ ptoductive. "Dichotomies are pervasive in ing forward, gesturing enthusiastically, my M[estern thinking," I add, warming to my voice effortlessly projecting throughout the J9pic, my excitement growing. The circle of room. One of my students, a lovely young }fudents remains quite unexcited, but I con­ woman who works in my department office, tinue.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Applying Social Constructionist Epistemology to Research In
    Losantos, Montoya, Exeni, Santa Cruz & Loots Applying Social Constructionist Epistemology to Research in Psychology Marcela Losantos, Tatiana Montoya, Scherezada Exeni La Paz, Bolivia & Brussels, Belgium Mariana Santa Cruz Santa Cruz, Bolivia & Brussels, Belgium Gerrit Loots Brussels, Belgium Abstract This contribution presents three methods for collecting information on research in psychology, inspired by the premises of social constructionism. First, we propose that the position of not knowing allows formulating research questions that balanced the power relationship among the researcher and child participants living on the streets. Then, we present a new methodology of joint construction of life stories with adolescents in conflict with the law, who are deprived from freedom. Finally, we exhibit how social constructionism led to the recognition of multiple voices in the study of social support with migrant women in Bolivia. Keywords: research in psychology, social constructionism, methodology, position of not knowing, joint construction of stories, vulnerable population. Introduction This article is the result of a seminar on social constructionist epistemology, conducted as part of our doctoral training. As a product of this seminar, our investigations were profoundly transformed, allowing us to find new directions and generate new findings. In this sense, we present three methods of data collection in the field of psychology, with populations in situations of social vulnerability. These methodologies were motivated by the principles of social constructionism. We hope this contribution will inspire other doctoral students who are beginning the journey. First, we present a theoretical review of the main ideas of this epistemology, applied to research. Then, we describe and explain the basic premises of the social constructionism research in the field of psychology and finally we present three types of data collection methodologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Autoethnography to Explore and Critically Reflect Upon Changing Identity
    Using autoethnography to explore and critically reflect upon changing identity annmarie judge preston Abstract Reflexivity is a professional requirement of the Adult Guidance Counsellor, with reflex- ive practice paramount to our work. From 2008 to 2010 I trained as an Adult Guidance Counsellor while working with an unemployed adult client group. During this time, I also journeyed through my first pregnancy. Towards the end of my training, I experi- enced a crisis, which led to a process of reflection and transformative learning. In this paper, I share personal writings from my learning journey, using autoethnography as a vehicle for reflexivity. Authoethnography is a research method that allows the author to write in a highly personalised style, drawing on his or her own experience to extend understanding about a social phenomenon. My reflections show a subjective change over time to the understanding of my changing self, and highlight the role of autoeth- nography as a reflexive tool for the Guidance Counsellors’ Practice. Introduction We must write about what we really prefer not to write about. It is not about pre- senting ourselves in a good light – in charge, competent, controlled, organised and so on, or how we might like to be seen. Rather it is about writing rich, full accounts that include the messy stuff – the self-doubts, the mistakes, the embar- rassments, the inconsistencies, the projections and that which may be distaste- ful. It is about writing all of it. Tenni, Smyth, Bochner, (2001:4) ‘My Story…’ On November 4th 2008, the world changed, as Barack Hussein Obama became the first African American to be elected as president of the United States of America.
    [Show full text]
  • Autoethnography: a Potential Method for Sikh Theory to Praxis Research
    religions Article Autoethnography: A Potential Method for Sikh Theory to Praxis Research Narinder Kaur-Bring Centre for Sikh and Panjabi Studies, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, UK; [email protected] Received: 16 November 2020; Accepted: 16 December 2020; Published: 19 December 2020 Abstract: The application of autoethnographic research as an investigative methodology in Sikh studies may appear relatively novel. Yet the systematic analysis in autoethnography of a person’s experience through reflexivity and connecting the personal story to the social, cultural, and political life has synergy with the Sikh sense-making process. Deliberation (vichhar) of an individual’s experience through the embodied wisdom of the Guru¯ (gurmat) connecting the lived experience to a greater knowing and awareness of the self is an established practice in Sikhi. This article explores autoethnography as a potential research method to give an academic voice to and capture the depth of the lived experiences of Sikhs: first, by articulating the main spaces of synergy of autoethnography with gurmat vichhar; second, discussing common themes such as inclusivity of disregarded voices, accessibility to knowledge creation, relational responsibility, and integrity in storytelling common to both autoethnography and gurmat vichhar. In conclusion, the autoethnographic approach has the means to illuminate nuances in understanding Sikhi that is transformative and familiar to the ancestral process of how Sikhs have made sense of themselves and the world around them. Keywords: Sikh; autoethnography; lived experience; reflexivity; gurmat; diaspora; pandemic 1. Introduction This essay aimed to evaluate the inherent subjective nature and flexibility of autoethnography as a potential methodology in Sikh Studies, in particular, in researching the lived experiences of Sikhs across the globe.
    [Show full text]
  • Autoethnography
    Autoethnography IIQM Webinar Series Dr. Sarah Wall July 24, 2014 Presentation Overview This is an introductory overview of autoethnography Origins and definitions Methodological approaches Examples Controversies and the future of autoethnography Questions from participants My Autoethnographic Work Adoptive motherhood Transdisciplinary education Learning theory Methodological papers Also, as editor of IJQM – see a lot of submissions about autoethnography An Increasingly Popular Method Simple literature search using keyword “autoethnography” 1990-2002 – about 5-10/year 2003 on – about 35/year (Muncey, 2010) My own search this week: Sociological Abstracts (scholarly journals, English) 2000-2009 – 110 2010-2014 – 114 Topics: Gender, sexuality, race, discrimination, sport, illness, death, pregnancy, family, getting a PhD, work processes… Origins of Autoethnography Term “autoethnography” in use for 35 years – introduced by Hayano but… “I also acknowledge but disregard studies...which analyze one's own life through the procedures of ethnography. These studies are not only autoethnographic, they are self- ethnographic, but it is not immediately shown how they are applicable to other cultural members” (Hayano, 1979, p. 103) What is Autoethnography? Nevertheless, Ellis & Bochner use the term to describe exactly such “self-ethnographic” work Autoethnographies “are highly personalized accounts that draw upon the experience of the author/researcher for the purposes of extending sociological understanding” (Sparkes, 2000, p. 21)
    [Show full text]
  • Apparently Being a Self-Obsessed C**T Is Now Academically Lauded": Experiencing Twitter Trolling of Autoethnographers
    Volume 18, No. 3, Art. 16 September 2017 "Apparently Being a Self-Obsessed C**t Is Now Academically Lauded": Experiencing Twitter Trolling of Autoethnographers Elaine Campbell Key words: Abstract: Online hostility and mockery, often known as "trolling," is a phenomenon almost as old as autoethnography; the internet itself. Nevertheless, the rise in trolling aimed at researchers using non-traditional, trolling; social creative methodologies, such as autoethnography, remains severely under-explored. This essay media seeks to fill the gap in the literature and make a contribution to the discourse on autoethnographic research. Writing autoethnographically, I share my experience of discovering vile, misogynist, and cruel trolling of autoethnographers and their work on the social media platform Twitter. I reflect on the online hatred I received when I raised the issue publically. Many of the messages I received focused on my perceived inability to cope with opinions other than my own. Therefore, I finish by offering a brief response to critiques of autoethnography; albeit criticism that comes from researchers who raise their concerns in a constructive and scholarly manner. Above all, the purpose of this essay is to bring trolling of autoethnographers to the fore and encourage others to speak about their experiences. If we do not write about trolling, then it—and our story—remains hidden. Table of Contents 1. Prologue 2. Hello Twitter 3. Trolling 4. Back to Twitter 5. Online Misogyny 6. Healthy Criticism of Autoethnography: My Response 6.1 "Diddling your pet hamster": The accusation that autoethnographers are narcissists 6.2 "Is it just "stuff that happened to me"?": The accusation autoethnography is unscientific 6.3 "I get it's writing about yourself, but what if you don't have anything interesting to say?": The accusation that autoethnographers are uninteresting 7.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Autoethnography in Educational Research: Locating Who We Are in What We Do
    Canadian Journal for New Scholars in Education/ Volume 3, Issue 1 Revue canadienne des jeunes chercheures et chercheurs en éducation June 2010 The Use of Autoethnography in Educational Research: Locating Who We Are in What We Do Lisa J. Starr University of Victoria [email protected] Abstract Autoethnography is a research method that engages the individual in cultural analysis and interpretation (Chang, 2008). The resultant self-analysis can have purposeful implications for the preparation of teachers and schools leaders. The process of self-exploration and interrogation aids individuals in locating themselves within their own history and culture allowing them to broaden their understanding of their own values in relation to others. In this paper, the methodological implications of autoethnography as well as its value as a research method is discussed in the context of understanding the self/other dialectic. Further, the relationship between autoethnography and the philosophical and practical implications relating to identity within education is examined. Introduction The modern era of public schooling has emphasized a gridlock of planning, design, implementation, and evaluation in education (Eisner, 2004); leaving much said about the structure of schooling and less about the agentic roles within it. In Canada, birth patterns and immigration have changed the face of the student population; as a result, complex diversity has become a cornerstone of public education (Ryan, Pollack, & Antonelli, 2009). Teachers, administrators, and school personnel face unprecedented socio-economic, religious, and ethnic heterogeneity in the student population. However, those who guide students have yet to occupy a similar space; that is, diversity amongst teachers is significantly underrepresented in school settings (Ryan et al., 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • The Whiteness of Silence: a Critical Autoethnographic Tale of a Strategic Rhetoric
    The Qualitative Report Volume 20 Number 9 Article 7 9-14-2015 The Whiteness of Silence: A Critical Autoethnographic Tale of a Strategic Rhetoric Jennifer E. Potter Towson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr Part of the Quantitative, Qualitative, Comparative, and Historical Methodologies Commons, and the Social Statistics Commons Recommended APA Citation Potter, J. E. (2015). The Whiteness of Silence: A Critical Autoethnographic Tale of a Strategic Rhetoric. The Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1434-1447. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2290 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the The Qualitative Report at NSUWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Qualitative Report by an authorized administrator of NSUWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Whiteness of Silence: A Critical Autoethnographic Tale of a Strategic Rhetoric Abstract Nakayama and Krizeck’s essay, “A Strategic Rhetoric of Whiteness” offers an understanding of Whiteness as cultural praxis operating beyond the narrow understanding of mere skin color. While scholars have added valuable contributions to the study of Whiteness, the discussion of the “strategic rhetoric” still lacks examples of embodiment. This essay seeks to demonstrate the deployment of Whiteness by describing a specific moment in which I was complicit in the deployment of Whiteness using the strategy of silence. This essay enumerates the machinations of Whiteness hidden in a seemingly mundane performance and contributes to an ongoing conversation about problematizing Whiteness. Keywords Critical Autoethnography, Whiteness Studies, Race, and Ethnicity Studies Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluative Criteria for Autoethnographic Research: Who’S to Judge? (Chapter 15)
    Portland State University PDXScholar Library Faculty Publications and Presentations University Library 8-2017 Evaluative Criteria for Autoethnographic Research: Who’s to Judge? (Chapter 15) Robert Schroeder Portland State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/ulib_fac Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details R. Schroeder. "Evaluative Criteria for Autoethnographic Research: Who’s to Judge?" The Self as Subject: Autoethnographic Research into Identity, Culture, and Academic Librarianship. Deitering, A.M., R. Schroeder & R. Stoddart (Eds.), Chicago, IL: ACRL Publications, 2017. Chapter 15. This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Library Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Chapter 15* Evaluative Criteria for Autoethnographic Research Who’s to Judge? Robert Schroeder Stories go in circles. They don’t go in straight lines. It helps if you listen in circles because there are stories inside and between stories, and finding your way through them is as easy and as hard as finding your way home. Part of finding is getting lost, and when you are lost you start to open up and listen. —Terry Tayofa1 It’s September 2014, and I’m sitting in my office at my computer, finishing the second of two articles about Indigenous and critical research methods and their potential for librarians and librarianship.2 Synchronisitically, I receive an e-mail from a colleague, Anne-Ma- rie Deitering, looking for feedback regarding an idea she has for a journal issue showcasing the autoethnographic research method.
    [Show full text]
  • Autoethnography Introduction and Overview
    1 Autoethnography Introduction and Overview Draft Proof - Do not copy, post, or distribute Copyright ©2017 by SAGE Publications, Inc. This work may not be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means without express written permission of the publisher. Chapter 1 Autoethnography 5 Focus Your Reading • What is the history of autoethnography as it relates to traditional qualitative research approaches? • How does autoethnography function as a broad methodology as well as a specific method of data collection and analysis? • How is autoethnography debated and critiqued because of its focus on the self? • What are five key ideas to consider when applying autoethnography as critical social research? Histories of Autoethnography Prior to discussing the functions and forms that define autoethnography as contem- porary critical social research, we need to address the histories of autoethnography and how the genre has evolved. We begin this introductory chapter by delving into the historical evolution of the naming of autoethnography. Autoethnography in its most simplified definition is the study of the self (Reed-Danahay, 1997, p. 9). While related to autobiography, narrative, and ethnography, it is unique from a research perspective in that the researcher is the subject of study. We view autoethnography as part of the broader family of qualitative approaches that includes ethnography, self-study, and narrative inquiry. By using the phrases histories of autoethnography and historical evolution, we intend to highlight evidence from multiple published perspec- tives on the historical lineage of autoethnography. The histories of the genre detailed here are drawn primarily from five academic sources: Hayano (1979); Reed-Danahay (1997); Anderson (2006); Elder, Bremser, and Sheridan (2007); and Ellis, Adams, and Bochner (2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Exo-Autoethnography: an Introduction
    Volume 18, No. 3, Art. 13 September 2017 Exo-Autoethnography: An Introduction Anna Denejkina Key words: Abstract: Exo-autoethnography is the autoethnographic exploration of a history whose events the autoethnography; researcher does not experience directly, but a history that impacts the researcher through familial, exo- or other personal connections, by proxy. It is an approach to research and autoethnographic writing autoethnography; that seeks to analyze individual and private experience, as directed by the other's experience or posttraumatic history, to better understand: a history that affects the researcher indirectly; and personal and stress disorder community experience as it relates to that history. (PTSD); familial trauma; trauma The method of exo-autoethnographic research and writing has been developed for the qualitative transmission; study into transgenerational transmission of trauma, moving beyond the personal experience of the transgenerational researcher. In this first and preliminary conception, the method aims to connect the present with a transmission of history of the other through transgenerational transmission of trauma and/or experiences of an trauma upbringing influenced by parental trauma. Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. What Is Exo-Autoethnography? 2.1 On autoethnography 2.1.1 Evocative autoethnography 2.1.2 Analytic autoethnography 2.2 A note on criticism of autoethnography 2.3 On exo-autoethnography 2.4 Doing exo-autoethnography 2.5 Transgenerational trauma 3. Conclusion References Author Citation 1. Introduction In this article, I introduce a new autoethnographic method: exo-autoethnography. This method aims to shed light on, and add knowledge to the study of transgenerational trauma transmission (TTT). Exo-autoethnography connects the present with a history of the other through the impact of TTT and/or experiences of an upbringing influenced by parental trauma.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic Communities, Identity and Belonging: an Autoethnography
    ETHNIC COMMUNITIES, IDENTITY AND BELONGING: AN AUTOETHNOGRAPHY by Evanilde Bekkout, BA in Arts – Major History, Ryerson University, 2014 A Major Research Paper presented to Ryerson University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Program of Immigration and Settlement Studies Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2015 ©Evanilde Bekkout 2015 Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this major research paper. This is a true copy of the MRP, including any required final revisions. I authorize Ryerson University to lend this paper to other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I further authorize Ryerson University to reproduce this paper by photocopying or by other means, in total or in part, at the request of other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I understand that my MRP may be made electronically available to the public. Evanilde Bekkout ii ETHNIC COMMUNITIES, IDENTITY AND BELONGING: AN AUTOETHNOGRAPHY Evanilde Bekkout Master of Arts 2015 Immigration and Settlement Studies Ryerson University Abstract This paper presents an autoethnographic analysis of identity and belonging. I describe some of my own experiences as a member of the Brazilian and Portuguese communities in order to propose that multicultural individuals need to navigate among the many identities they relate to, which make them live at the margins of cultural groups rather than limiting them to one exclusive culture. I examine the period I lived in the Brazilian community and why I do not fit there; and why I fit in the Portuguese community although I do not feel that I fully belong there.
    [Show full text]
  • Representing Ourselves in Information Science Research
    Representing Ourselves in Information Science Research: A Methodological Essay on Autoethnography / La représentation de nous-mêmes dans la recherche en sciences de l’information : Essai méthodologique sur l’auto-ethnographie Elysia Guzik Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, Volume 37, Number 4, December/décembre 2013, pp. 267-283 (Article) Published by University of Toronto Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/ils.2013.0025 For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/536795 [ Access provided at 1 Oct 2021 12:29 GMT with no institutional affiliation ] Representing La représentation de Ourselves in nous-mêmes dans la Information Science recherche en sciences Research: A de l’information : Essai Methodological Essay méthodologique sur on Autoethnography l’auto-ethnographie Elysia Guzik PhD Student Faculty of Information, University of Toronto 140 St. George Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3G6 [email protected] Abstract: Autoethnography offers a promising methodology to illuminate informa- tion experiences, yet it has been relegated to the margins of information science. This paper reviews examples and critiques of autoethnographic research and sup- ports the idea that autoethnographic approaches increase information professionals’ awareness of their cultural assumptions and provide a framework for analysing such assumptions when developing programs and services (Michels 2010, 166). By showcasing an exemplary autoethnographic study (Michels 2010), this paper presents autoethnography as a useful methodology that acknowledges the research- er’s subjectivity, accounts for the affective aspects of information experiences, and focuses on how personal stories can teach us about information behaviour. Keywords: autoethnography, interpretive methods, narrative, reflexivity, informa- tion experience Résumé : L’auto-ethnographie propose une méthodologie prometteuse permettant d’éclairer les expériences informationnelles.
    [Show full text]