DOCSLIB.ORG

Sect 3 Chapter 23.Qxp

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sect 3 Chapter 23.Qxp The Henge Builders New Discoveries inspire archaeologists to re-envision the culture that created Stonehenge. BY MIKE PITTS N 1856 AMERICAN WRITER NATHANIEL ing Britain’s stone circles. On that project I found a IHawthorne hired a carriage for a 10-mile journey pit that once held a large megalith; its location from the rural town of Salisbury to Stonehenge. Of strengthened the idea that the stones were aligned the great megaliths he wrote,” There never was a with the rising and setting sun. But I ran into the ruder thing made by mortal hands as if Nature and same problem that then impeded all new man had worked upon it with one consent, and so... Stonehenge research—the results of nearly a centu- all the stranger and more impressive from its rude- ry of intermittent excavation at the site had been ness.” largely unpublished and jealously guarded by the archaeologists. Resolving this shameful situation Some 150 years later I’m following Haw- took a new generation of scholars, as well as a thorne’s route across Salisbury Plain, along a rough determined push from English Heritage, the public track that opens onto sweeping fields and skies. I agency that manages Stonehenge. can see Stonehenge less than a mile away, on a gen- tly sloping spur, dwarfed by surrounding hills. In 1995, the publication of all twentieth-centu- There, massive blocks of sarsen sandstone rise 17 ry excavation results was completed and a new era feet, encircling even larger sarsen stones and rings of understanding began. All information about the of bluestones up to eight feet high that had been stones is now accessible. Controversial road con- transported more than 200 miles from the Preseli struction plans led to extensive surveys of the sur- Hills in Wales. Scattered around the landscape are rounding landscape. Substantial monuments exca- earthen mounds 12 or more feet high, covering the vated in the last century once thought to be older Bronze Age graves of people once thought to have, than the stones, now seem to be contemporary, built the mysterious monument. according to a refined radiocarbon chronology. These include the sites of Woodhenge and The view has changed little since Hawthorne’s Durrington Walls, which sit only 200 feet apart. The time, but my vision of Stonehenge today is very dif- sites feature hundreds of tall oak posts that seem to ferent. Artists, mystics, and scientists have contem- mimic Stonehenge. New excavations at Durrington plated the stones for centuries, calling them every- Walls, named after a nearby village, have revealed a thing from a place to summon demons to the Neolithic settlement where heaps of artifacts and world’s first computer. Hawthorne didn’t find any animal bones suggest complex rituals. answers here. It is, he wrote, “a mystery as to who built it, and how, and for what purpose.” But now, We are in the midst of the most dramatic era of as modern archaeology reaches beyond the stones, Stonehenge discovery and debate since burials near we are finding a ceremonial landscape as unique s the monument were first excavated 200 years ago. the megaliths within it. While the new excavations have yet to be fully ana- lyzed, let me share with you some of the excitement My first excavation at Stonehenge took place and surprises that enliven what many have seen as a nearly 30 years ago, at the start of my career study- monument with nothing more to say. “The Henge Builders” by Mike Pitts. Reprinted with permission of ARCHAEOLOGY magazine, Vol. 61, #1, www.archaeology.org. Copyright © The Archaeological Institute of America, January/February 2008. 1 2 The Henge Builders Despite centuries of erosion and the number of stones that have fallen or were carried away, Stonehenge’s unique profile still evokes awe in one million visitors each year. INCE THE NINETEENTH CENTURY, everything from the carpentry-like jointing of the SStonehenge was believed to have been built in sarsen stones to the very concept of a monumental the Bronze Age because of the exceptional number arrangement of freestanding uprights. This new of nearby graves that contained bronze daggers and context may offer insight into how the stones fit other fine artifacts. Richard Atkinson, director of within the belief system of the people who erected Stonehenge excavations in the 1950s and ‘60s, them. favored 1500–1400 B.C. as a time frame for the erection of the megaliths. The apparent similarities in the layout of the stones at Stonehenge and the posts at Woodhenge It came as a shock when the 1995 radiocarbon and Durrington Walls particularly struck Mike dates indicated the stones were erected up to a thou- Parker Pearson, an archaeologist at the University sand years earlier, pushing Stonehenge back to the of Sheffield, while he was conducting fieldwork in Neolithic period. Use of the site as a monument Madagascar. Ritual megaliths and posts are still began with construction of a circular ditch and bank erected on the large island off the east coast of at about 2975 B.C. (That date, the most precise we Africa. Some Madagascans associate stone with have for Stonehenge, was derived from analysis of their deceased ancestors, and wood with living peo- nine digging tools made of red deer antler.) ple. Perhaps, thought Parker Pearson and his Madagascan colleague, Ramilisonina, the same The new date puts Stonehenge in an entirely principle applied more than 4,000 years ago in different context. Now we understand the megaliths southern England. are roughly the same age as the ceremonial timber rings at Durrington Walls and Woodhenge. Late The landscape, they argued, could be divided Neolithic people (3000–2200 B.C.) knew how to into two “domains,” that of the ancestors around work stone to make cutting tools and weapons. And Stonehenge in the west, and that of the living beside it is now possible to understand that the construc- the River Avon in the east. Debris, including bones tion of Stonehenge was inspired by nearby circular of butchered pigs, had been recovered from the tim- oak structures (see box “The Wooden Henges,”) in ber monuments at Woodhenge and Durrington The Henge Builders 3 Walls but no evidence of feasting and few artifacts It is well known that Stonehenge faces the have been found at Stonehenge despite structural summer solstice sunrise, but the site is also aligned similarities between the sites. That, said Parker to the winter solstice sunset. Parker Pearson argues Pearson and Ramilisonina, was because the stone that the winter alignment also links Stonehenge and monument was inhabited only by the spirits of the Durrington Walls. Analysis of huge numbers of pig ancestors. teeth recovered from Durrington revealed that most of the pigs had been killed when they were nine Stonehenge and Woodhenge-Durrington Walls months old. It is likely they were born in the spring, are close enough to be visible to each other were it so they probably died in the winter as part of a not for a ridge separating them. There is, however, a “midwinter cull,” he says. link between them marked by parallel banks and ditches 70 to 110 feet apart, known as the Stone- Archaeoastronomer Clive Ruggles, professor henge Avenue. Parker Pearson and Ramilisonina emeritus at the University of Leicester, provides believe it shows the two locations were connected further support for the winter solstice link. Citing physically and spiritually. The avenue begins at the results of a new archaeological survey, he says Stonehenge with a straight section aligned with the the entrance to the Southern Circle faces the rising site’s solar axis, It then takes a sharp right turn, winter solstice sun. Unlike Stonehenge, this site is crosses the ridge, turns right again, and ends near in a small valley, and the reverse summer alignment the river south of Woodhenge. The circuit formed is obscured. Here, at least, the alignment seems to by the avenue and the river—about five miles be a winter one. between Stonehenge and Woodhenge—linked the living and the dead. Parker Pearson’s vision is of a great win- ter solstice festival. People from a wide area In 2003, Parker Pearson and colleagues at the gathered at Durrington Walls to feast and con- universities of Manchester and Bournemouth duct ceremonies among the oak rings before launched the Stonehenge Riverside Project, named walking down the short avenue to cast the cre- for the concentration of earthworks and monuments mated remains of the dead in the river. Among on the west bank of the Avon, To date, eight more the dead, he argues, a select group of individuals universities and 30 researchers (myself included) would have had their ashes carried by hand down- have joined the project, making it one of the largest stream, and up the Stonehenge Avenue, to be buried in the history of British archaeology. in a ring around the stones. At least 50 cremations had been interred at Stonehenge, and perhaps many We have conducted fieldwork at numerous more, making the site the largest cemetery of its locations, but the Neolithic town at Durrington type in Britain. Walls has held an iconic fascination for us since landmark excavations at the site 40 years ago. To Discoveries of houses in the new excavations get down on our hands and knees and pick up the at Durrington Walls made headlines, The New York debris left by people who might have seen Stone- Times called it “the largest Neolithic village ever henge being built—at the same time as the Great found in Britain,” which is less impressive when it Pyramid in Egypt—is an unexpected privilege.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Archaeology's Place in Modernity
    THOMAS / archaeology’s place in modernity 17 Archaeology’s Place in Modernity Julian Thomas Introduction Archaeology, as an academic discipline and as a means of MODERNISM / modernity addressing the past, is a phenomenon that emerged in the mod- VOLUME ELEVEN, NUMBER ern era. For many commentators this is because some specific ONE, PP 17–34. © 2004 THE JOHNS aspect of the modern experience has facilitated or promoted HOPKINS UNIVERSITY PRESS the study of the material traces of the past. These might include the rise of an educated and affluent middle class; improvements in transport, which rendered the antiquities of the countryside accessible; or the construction of canals and railways, and the consequent exposure of buried deposits. However, in this con- tribution I will argue that the link between archaeology and modernity is more than circumstantial. Indeed, I will suggest that modern philosophy, modern forms of political organization, and modern social practices represent the ground of the possi- bility of “doing archaeology.” I will hope to demonstrate that in some senses archaeology distills a modern sensibility, embody- Julian Thomas is ing conceptions of time, humanity, nature, and science that have Chair of Archaeology at the University of been widely adopted over the past half-millennium. It is dis- Manchester, and is a tinctive of the modern world that philosophy and science, while Vice-President of the representing the discourses of specialized professionals, have Royal Anthropological contributed much to the everyday rationality routinely employed Institute. His publica- by lay people. This is in part because philosophy and science tions include Time, partake of a “ground plan” or set of fundamental assumptions Culture and Identity that is hard to fully articulate, and is therefore metaphysical.1 (Routledge, 1996), Understanding the Archaeology, perhaps as much as any other discipline, is steeped Neolithic (Routledge, in the implicit and explicit presuppositions of modern thought.
    [Show full text]
  • BENEATH HAY BLUFF, UNITED KINGDOM Course ID: ARCH 365BG June 23Rd – August 1St, 2021
    BENEATH HAY BLUFF, UNITED KINGDOM Course ID: ARCH 365BG June 23rd – August 1st, 2021 FIELD SCHOOL DIRECTOR(S): Prof. Julian Thomas, Department of Classics, Ancient History & Archaeology, University of Manchester ([email protected]) Prof. Keith Ray, Department of Archaeology, University of Cardiff ([email protected]) Dr. Nick Overton, Department of Classics, Ancient History & Archaeology, University of Manchester ([email protected]) Tim Hoverd, Herefordshire County Council ([email protected]) INTRODUCTION Since 2010, the Beneath Hay Bluff Project has been investigating the character of prehistoric, and specifically Neolithic activity in southwest Herefordshire, or the border between modern England and Wales. This region has been somewhat neglected by prehistoric archaeology, in part owing to a lack of antiquarian investigations, but it is increasingly clear that it is distinguished by a rich and under- exploited prehistoric record. In seeking to address questions of monumentality, memory, place and material traditions, we have excavated at a number of sites, including the funerary round cairn at 1 | P a g e Olchon Court and the long mounds, buildings and causewayed enclosure of Dorstone Hill. The region is a rural one, with picturesque villages, castles, abbeys, rolling hills and lush river valleys: it is at once typically ‘English’ and bordering on rugged Welsh uplands. The field school provides a unique learning experience by drawing on the resources of both the University of Manchester and Herefordshire Archaeology, who contribute facilities, equipment and staff. Many of our supervisory staff are professionals from the world of commercial archaeology, who bring a wealth of experience and know- how.
    [Show full text]
  • Durrington Walls
    Durrington Walls Stonehenge builders' houses found A huge ancient settlement used by the people who built Stonehenge has been found, archaeologists have said. Excavations at Durrington Walls, near the legendary Salisbury Plain monument, uncovered remains of ancient houses. People seem to have occupied the sites seasonally, using them for ritual feasting and funeral ceremonies. In ancient times, this settlement would have housed hundreds of people, making it the largest Neolithic village ever found in Britain. The dwellings date back to 2,600-2,500 BC - according to the researchers, the same period that Stonehenge was built. But some archaeologists point out that there are problems dating Stonehenge itself because the stone circle has been rebuilt many times. The village would have housed hundreds of people (Image: National Geographic) Consequently, archaeological material has been dug up and reburied on numerous occasions, making it difficult to assign a date to the original construction. But Mike Parker Pearson and his colleagues are confident of a link. "In what were houses, we have excavated the outlines on the floors of box beds and wooden dressers or cupboards," he explained. The Sheffield University researcher said this was based on the fact that these abodes had exactly the same layout as Neolithic houses at Skara Brae, Orkney, which have survived intact because - unlike these dwellings - they were made of stone. The researchers have excavated eight houses in total at Durrington. But they have identified many other probable dwellings using geophysical surveying equipment. In fact, they think there could have been at least one hundred houses. Each one measured about 5m (16ft) square, was made of timber, with a clay floor and central hearth.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download Stonehenge: Making Sense of a Prehistoric Mystery Kindle
    STONEHENGE: MAKING SENSE OF A PREHISTORIC MYSTERY PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Mike Parker Pearson,Joshua Pollard,Colin Richards,Julian Thomas,Kate Welham | 120 pages | 29 Feb 2016 | Council for British Archaeology | 9781909990029 | English | York, United Kingdom Stonehenge: Making Sense of a Prehistoric Mystery PDF Book We aim to show you accurate product information. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Accept Cookies Customise Cookies. Record type: Book. Excellent coverage of latest fingings and theory on the monument. See All Buying Options. Verified Purchase. Cancel Post. A distinguished prehistorian he has been involved with many major projects, including leading the recent Stonehenge Riverside Project. Mauchline was the administrative centre of the regality of Kylesmuir, granted in the twelfth century to Melrose Abbey. Author: Colin Richards. Jo marked it as to-read Apr 17, Located on the south side of the River Tees, in north-east England, the Roman villa at Ingleby Barwick is one of the most northerly in the Roman Empire. Sarah marked it as to-read Apr 20, We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. Showing 0 comments. Pickup not available. Audible Download Audiobooks. Joshua Pollard ,. Create a commenting name to join the debate Submit. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. Arrived quickly. Add to registry. Download statistics Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Overview Stonehenge is an iconic monument for people all around the world. Last modified: 14 Jul Stonehenge: Making Sense of a Prehistoric Mystery Writer Mike Parker Pearson. Try again.
    [Show full text]
  • Afterword and Acknowledgements
    AFTERWORD AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A short genealogy: At the first conference on 'Devising and Documentation', organised by the Centre for Performance Research in Cardiff in February 1993, a number of performance practitioners and companies were invited to give precise ten-minute reflections on particular aspects of their work. The chosen forms included lecture, demonstration, exposition, short performance. Several used video, slide and overhead projection. They were, by turn, polemical, anecdotal, autobiographical, descriptive, scripted, improvised. In each presentation, the remains of the past were used to create something in the present. And all these ways of remembering represented forms of documentation. This was a revelation for those delegates who had regarded the single viewpoint, real-time video-recording as the authentic record of performance. Julian Thomas also spoke on the nature of the archaeo- logical record, the vagaries of survival and how we make use of the traces of the past in the present. He suggested that we can neither create an authoritative record nor try to predetermine and control its interpretation. Perhaps the best we can ever do is to put exciting material into the world and then let it alight where it will, envisaging creative acts of interpretation at other times and in other places. An initial series of provocations towards a theatre archaeology were presented at the conference. Julian Thomas's responses to them completed a seminal piece published in The Drama Review (Pearson 1994a; Thomas 1994). In the dialogue of a set of evolving relationships, articulated in a series of papers, presentations and practical projects manifest almost entirely within the discourse of archaeology, the deeper affinities of the two practices were further revealed.
    [Show full text]
  • Time, Culture and Identity: an Interpretive Archaeology
    Time, culture and identity: An interpretive archaeology. Julian Thomas Routledge, London and New York, 1996. ISBN: 0415118611. 267 pages. Book review by Danny Hind It is five years since we first read the introduction to Rethinking the Neolithic, where Julian Thomas grappled with the problems of self-aware and reflexive archaeological narrative. The past is unfamiliar, so the only way we can understand it is to familiarise it, to tame it; but then its nature has changed. The conclusion seemed to be that sooner or later you had to sit down and write a story, but one which not only captured as much of the 'wildness' of the past as possible, but was ethical with respect to the present. Strange then, many will think, that Dr. Thomas now chooses to work out "what a 'Heideggerian archaeology' might look like" (p.2). For those unfamiliar with the name, Martin Heidegger (1887-1976) was a philosopher who used the methods of phenomenology to explore the structures of human existence. His work, impressive if often impenetrable, has been largely ignored in some areas because as rector of Freiburg University (1933-1945) he was a member of the Nazi Party, resulting in a tarnished reputation which he made no effort to restore. Two questions then: can Thomas's use of Heidegger be justified and, if so, is it strictly necessary? It is not for me to write Thomas's apology (he provides his own in the introduction). It is notable that Chris Gosden was unapologetic about his use of Heidegger's ideas in Social Being and Time.
    [Show full text]
  • A Massive, Late Neolithic Pit Structure Associated with Durrington Walls Henge, Internet Archaeology 55
    This PDF is a simplified version of the original article published in Internet Archaeology. Enlarged images, the animation and all additional data that support this publication can be found in the original version online. All links also go to the online version. Please cite this as: Gaffney, V. et al. 2020 A Massive, Late Neolithic Pit Structure associated with Durrington Walls Henge, Internet Archaeology 55. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.55.4 A Massive, Late Neolithic Pit Structure associated with Durrington Walls Henge Vincent Gaffney, Eamonn Baldwin, Martin Bates, C. Richard Bates, Christopher Gaffney, Derek Hamilton, Tim Kinnaird, Wolfgang Neubauer, Ronald Yorston, Robin Allaby, Henry Chapman, Paul Garwood, Klaus Löcker, Alois Hinterleitner, Tom Sparrow, Immo Trinks, Mario Wallner and Matt Leivers Summary A series of massive geophysical anomalies, located south of the Durrington Walls henge monument, were identified during fluxgate gradiometer survey undertaken by the Stonehenge Hidden Landscapes Project (SHLP). Initially interpreted as dewponds, these data have been re-evaluated, along with information on similar features revealed by archaeological contractors undertaking survey and excavation to the north of the Durrington Walls henge. Analysis of the available data identified a total of 20 comparable features, which align within a series of arcs adjacent to Durrington Walls. Further geophysical survey, supported by mechanical coring, was undertaken on several geophysical anomalies to assess their nature, and to provide dating and environmental evidence. The results of fieldwork demonstrate that some of these features, at least, were massive, circular pits with a surface diameter of 20m or more and a depth of at least 5m.
    [Show full text]
  • Neolithic of Europe.Indb
    THE NEOLITHIC OF EUROPE PAPERS IN HONOUR OF ALASDAIR WHITTLE THE NEOLITHIC OF EUROPE PAPERS IN HONOUR OF ALASDAIR WHITTLE Edited by PENNY BICKLE, VICKI CUMMINGS, DANIELA HOFMANN AND JOSHUA POLLARD Oxford & Philadelphia Published in the United Kingdom in 2017 by OXBOW BOOKS The Old Music Hall, 106–108 Cowley Road, Oxford OX4 1JE and in the United States by OXBOW BOOKS 1950 Lawrence Road, Havertown, PA 19083 © Oxbow Books and the individual authors 2017 Hardcover Edition: ISBN 978-1-78570-654-7 Digital Edition: ISBN 978-1-78570-655-4 (epub) A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library and the Library of Congress All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the publisher in writing. Printed in Malta by Gutenberg Press Ltd Typeset in India by Lapiz Digital Services, Chennai For a complete list of Oxbow titles, please contact: UNITED KINGDOM Oxbow Books Telephone (01865) 241249, Fax (01865) 794449 Email: [email protected] www.oxbowbooks.com UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Oxbow Books Telephone (800) 791-9354, Fax (610) 853-9146 Email: [email protected] www.casemateacademic.com/oxbow Oxbow Books is part of the Casemate Group Front cover: Alleskoven dolmen, Denmark (Vicki Cummings). Back cover: La Table des Marchands, France (Vicki Cummings); a reconstructed LBK longhouse in the Paris basin (Penny Bickle); Carrowmore, Ireland (Vicki Cummings); an excavation in progress at the Herpaly tell, Hungary (Pál Raczky).
    [Show full text]
  • 'Blue Stonehenge' Discovered 6 October 2009
    'Blue Stonehenge' discovered 6 October 2009 route constructed at the end of the Stone Age - or the Neolithic period. The outer henge around the stones was built around 2400 BC, but arrowheads found in the stone circle indicate that the stones were put up as much as 500 years earlier. When the newly discovered circle’s stones were removed by Neolithic tribes, they may, according to the team, have been dragged to Stonehenge, to be incorporated within its major rebuilding around The artist's impression. Credit Peter Dunn. 2500 BC. Archaeologists know that after this date, Stonehenge consisted of about 80 Welsh stones (PhysOrg.com) -- Archaeologists have released an and 83 local, sarsen stones. Some of the artist’s impression of what a second stone circle bluestones that once stood at the riverside probably found a mile from Stonehenge might have looked now stand within the centre of Stonehenge. like. The discovery may confirm of the Stonehenge The drawing shows the sensational discovery of Riverside Project’s theory that the River Avon “Blue Stonehenge” by a team led by linked a ‘domain of the living’ - marked by timber archaeologists from Manchester, Sheffield and circles and houses upstream at the Neolithic village Bristol Universities on the West bank of the River of Durrington Walls (discovered by the Project in Avon last month. 2005) - with a ‘domain of the dead’ marked by Stonehenge and this new stone circle. Professor Julian Thomas, from The University of Manchester and a co-director of the Stonehenge The team hope to radiocarbon date antler picks Riverside Project, said the monument was a circle found on the site - used by the stone circle builders of bluestones, dragged from the Welsh Preseli as pickaxes - to provide more precise dates.
    [Show full text]
  • Experiential Interpretations of the Prehistoric Landscape
    Total Art Journal • Volume 1. No. 2 • Fall 2012 DOORS INTO THE NEOLITHIC MIND Experiential Interpretations of the Prehistoric Landscape SIMON PASCOE AND CAITLIN EASTERBY CHALK, 2011. Atsushi Takenouchi performing in Harting Down end action. Image Credit: Paul Winter. Can art unlock a sense of place that is just as important as the facts? We’ve been driven up the sides of the valley between flaming braziers to the sound of gongs and I wonder whether this is an insight into the avenue at Stonehenge or the great sacred enclosures that we have fragmentary traces of. The idea of moving in a ritual way through fire and wind and light and theatre – if this doesn’t help us to re-engage with ancient ideas then to be perfectly honest I can’t think what will. —Martin Ellis, Curator, Birmingham Museum and Art Gallery, 2011 Total Art Journal Volume 1 No. 2 Fall 2012 http://www.totalartjournal.com • • • Red Earth arts group has for over twenty years created outdoor site-specific installations and performanc- es in, and in response to, landscapes across Britain, mainland Europe, Java, Japan and Mongolia. These intensely experiential events are often the result of interdisciplinary collaborations between artists and non-arts professionals such as ecologists, archaeologists, geologists, historians, land managers, farmers, and communities. We attempt to engage the public in the creative process, bringing people together in participatory events to explore their natural and cultural heritages, and transforming our understanding of the places where we live.1 We are artists who have worked together as Red Earth since its inception over 20 years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • The Age of Stonehenge
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by NERC Open Research Archive The Age of Stonehenge Mike Parker Pearson1, Ros Cleal2, Josh Pollard3, Colin Richards4, Julian Thomas, Chris Tilley5, Kate Welham6, Andrew Chamberlain, Carolyn Chenery7, Jane Evans, Janet Montgomery8 & Mike Richards9 The date of Stonehenge’s sarsen circle and trilithons has never been satisfactorily established. This detailed re-examination of the monument’s stratigraphy identifies flaws in previous excavators’ interpretations, leading to a revision of the stratigraphic sequence and re-dating of this important phase(Phase 3ii) to 2620-2480 BC. Implications of this include the presence of Beaker pottery in Britain before 2500 BC, the relatively late adoption of an inhumation rite after 2470 BC for the Amesbury Archer and other early Beaker burials, and the possible contemporaneity of Stonehenge Phase 3ii with nearby Durrington Walls. The paper outlines two new initiatives: the Beaker People Project (analysing mobility, migration and diet in the late third millennium BC) and the Stonehenge Riverside Project (summarizing results of new excavations at Durrington Walls). Key words: Stonehenge, Durrington Walls, radiocarbon dating, Beakers Introduction The date of Stonehenge remains a matter of dispute. There is no agreement amongst archaeologists as to whether the sarsen stones were erected as early as 2600-2500 BC (Parker Pearson et al. in press), in the period after 2550 BC (Cleal et al. 1995: 167) or even towards the end of the millennium around 2300 BC or later (Pitts 2000: 144; Case 1997: 164). This is perhaps surprising, given the success of the 1994 dating programme which produced three of the four accepted radiocarbon dates from contexts associated with the erection of the sarsen circle and the trilithons (Phase 3ii; Cleal et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Entrevista a Julian Thomas Por Irene García Rovira*
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Revistes Catalanes amb Accés Obert Suau Mayol, Tomàs Entrevista a Julian Thomas Por Irene García Rovira* Julian Thomas comenzó su carrera universitaria estudiando ciencias arqueológicas en la Universidad de Bradford. Al obtener su licenciatura se trasladó a la Universidad de Sheffield donde obtuvo un Master en 1982 y donde realizó su tesis doctoral acabada en 1986. Su investigación se centró en el estudio de los cambios socio-económicos ocurridos durante el Neolítico en Wessex y la región de Upper Thames Valley. Más adelante fue profesor en la Universidad de Gales, Lampeter entre 1987 y 1993 y enseñó en la Universidad de Southampton desde 1994 hasta el año 2000. En abril de ese año, Julian Thomas obtuvo la Cátedra en Arqueología en la Universidad de Manchester. En la actualidad, su mayor área de investigación se centra en el estudio del periodo Neolítico en las Islas Británicas y en Noreste Europeo además de estar interesado en la relación entre teoría y filosofía en arqueología. Julian es vice- catedrático en el Standing Comitee for Archaeology. También ha sido vicepresidente del Royal Anthropological Institute entre 2001 y 2004. * Doctoranda de la University Of Manchester.PhD Archaeology. Su especialización es el neolitico final del area atlantica europea y teoria arqueologica. Está cursando la tesis: Space, Time and Identity: contacts through sea during the third millenium BC on the Atlantic fringe of Europe?’ 140 141 ENTREVISTA Julian Thomas No era un Nos gustaría empezar la entrevista mirando al alumno pasado, a la primera vez que pensó en ser arqueólogo ejemplar, y al momento que decidió tomar esta disciplina como básicamente profesión.
    [Show full text]