Draft Programme
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Final Draft Report on Constitutional Amendment Procedures
Strasbourg, 4 December 2009 CDL(2009)168* Study no. 469 / 2008 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) FINAL DRAFT REPORT ON CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT PROCEDURES on the basis of comments by Ms Gret HALLER (Member, Switzerland) Mr Fredrik SEJERSTED (Substitute member, Norway) Mr Kaarlo TUORI (Member, Finland) Mr Jan VELAERS (Member, Belgium) *This document has been classified restricted at the date of issue. Unless the Venice Commission decides otherwise, it will be declassified a year after its issue according to the rules set up in Resolution CM/Res(2001)6 on access to Council of Europe documents. This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL(2009)168 - 2 - TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ..........................................................................................................................3 II. Preliminary observations....................................................................................................3 III. Overview of existing constitutional provisions for amending national constitutions 7 A. Initiative................................................................................................................................7 B. Parliamentary procedures...................................................................................................8 C. Referendums.....................................................................................................................11 D. Special limitations -
Swiss Human Rights Policy: Between Humanitarian Tradition and Political Reluctance
Research Collection Working Paper Swiss human rights policy: between humanitarian tradition and political reluctance Author(s): Fanzun, Jon A. Publication Date: 2003 Permanent Link: https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-004474247 Rights / License: In Copyright - Non-Commercial Use Permitted This page was generated automatically upon download from the ETH Zurich Research Collection. For more information please consult the Terms of use. ETH Library Eidgenössische Ecole polytechnique fédérale de Zurich Technische Hochschule Politecnico federale di Zurigo Zürich Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich CIS / Center for International Studies, Zurich Zentrum für Internationale Studien, Zürich Jon A. Fanzun Swiss Human Rights Policy: Between Humanitarian Tradition and Political Reluctance Beiträge Nr. 39 • Januar 2003 Forschungsstelle für Internationale Beziehungen Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule 1 Table of contents Introduction ..............................................................................................................................3 1 Human Rights and Foreign Policy.................................................................................4 2 Humanitarianism and Neutrality...................................................................................6 2.1 Humanitarian Tradition..............................................................................................6 2.2 Neutrality and Solidarity ............................................................................................7 2.3 Lack of Human -
Rhetorics of Judge-Penitence
RHETORICS OF JUDGE-PENITENCE HOW MORAL SUPERIORITY IS PUBLICLY CONSTRUCTED THROUGH ADMISSIONS OF PAST WRONGDOING Bernhard Forchtner A thesis submitted to Lancaster University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy April 2011 ProQuest Number: 11003569 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 11003569 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 ABSTRACT Given the increasing number of public admissions of wrongdoing by official representatives of states, other institutions and individuals, as well as the subsequent scholarly attention directed to this phenomenon, this thesis investigates one potential misuse of such practices. Here, I take Albert Camus' novel The Fall as a starting point and ask if such admissions cannot ultimately be directed against 'others' through rhetorics of judge-penitence. Such an argumentative pattern aims to project the in-group as a penitent sinner which has faced its dark past and thus learnt the lessons provided by history. This creates, in turn, the possibility to construct an 'other' discursively as having failed to do so, i.e. as being morally inferior. -
2010 Annual Report
The Venice Commission 2010 Annual activity report 100 95 75 25 European Commission for Democracy through Law 5 COUNCIL CONSEIL OF EUROPE DE L’EUROPE 0 Member states of the Venice Commission, 2011 Members – 57 Kyrgyzstan (1.01.2004) Ukraine (3.02.1997) Latvia (11.09.1995) United Kingdom (1.06.1999) Albania (14.10.1996) Liechtenstein (26.08.1991) Algeria (1.12.2007) Lithuania (27.04.1994) Associate member Andorra (1.02.2000) Luxembourg (10.05.1990) Armenia (27.03.2001) Malta (10.05.1990) Belarus (24.11.1994) Austria (10.05.1990) Mexico (3.02.2010) Azerbaijan (1.03.2001) Moldova (25.06.1996) Observers – 7 Belgium (10.05.1990) Monaco (5.10.2004) Bosnia and Herzegovina (24.04.2002) Montenegro (20.06.2006) Argentina (20.04.1995) Brazil 01.04.2009) Morocco (1.06.2007) Canada (23.05.1991) Bulgaria (29.05.1992) Netherlands (1.08.1992) Holy See (13.01.1992) Chile (1.10.2005) Norway (10.05.1990) Japan (18.06.1993) Croatia (1.01.1997) Peru (11.02.2009) Kazakhstan (30.04.1998) Cyprus (10.05.1990) Poland (30.04.1992) United States (10.10.1991) Czech Republic (1.11.1994) Portugal (10.05.1990) Uruguay (19.10.1995) Denmark (10.05.1990) Romania (26.05.1994) Estonia (3.04.1995) Russian Federation (1.01.2002) Participants – 4 Finland (10.05.1990) San Marino (10.05.1990) France (10.05.1990) Serbia (3.04.2003). European Commission Georgia (1.10.1999) Slovakia (8.07.1993) EU Committee of the Regions Germany (3.07.1990) Slovenia (2.03.1994) OSCE/ODIHR Greece (10.05.1990) Spain (10.05.1990) International Association of Constitutional Hungary (28.11.1990) Sweden -
Menschenrechte Und Europa
zeitschrift für menschenrechte journal for human rights Menschenrechte und Europa Mit Beiträgen von Samantha Besson Hauke Brunkhorst Sonja Buckel Carina Fiebich-Dinkel Nadja Meisterhans Michael Popovi´c Marta Sánchez Dionis Markus Thiel herausgegeben von Tessa Debus, Regina Kreide, Michael Krennerich, Karsten Malowitz, Arnd Pollmann und Susanne Zwingel WOCHENSCHAU VERLAG 44901_zfmr901_zfmr 11_2013.indd_2013.indd 1 117.06.20137.06.2013 110:56:550:56:55 IMPRESSUM zeitschrift für menschenrechte journal for human rights Herausgeber: Tessa Debus (Wochenschau Verlag) Regina Kreide (Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen) Michael Krennerich (Nürnberger Menschenrechtszentrum sowie Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg) Karsten Malowitz (Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg) Arnd Pollmann (Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg) Wissenschaft- Susanne Zwingel (State University of New York, Potsdam) licher Beirat: Zehra Arat (Purchase College, New York) Heiner Bielefeldt (Friedrich-Alexander-Univ. Erlangen-Nürnberg) Marianne Braig (Freie Universität Berlin) Horst Fischer (Ruhr-Universität Bochum) Rainer Forst (Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt/M.) Karl-Peter Fritzsche (Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg) Brigitte Hamm (Institut für Entwicklung und Frieden, Duisburg) Rainer Huhle (Nürnberger Menschenrechtszentrum) Paul Martin (Human Rights Center, Columbia University) Anja Mihr (Utrecht University) Uta Ruppert (Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt/M.) Rainer Schmalz-Bruns (Leibniz Universität Hannover) Beate Wagner -
In Whose Name? INTERNATIONAL COURTS and TRIBUNALS SERIES
INTERNATIONAL COURTS AND TRIBUNALS SERIES General Editors: Ruth Mackenzie, Cesare P.R. Romano, and Philippe Sands In Whose Name? INTERNATIONAL COURTS AND TRIBUNALS SERIES General Editors: Ruth Mackenzie, Cesare P.R. Romano, and Philippe Sands A distinctive feature of modern international society is the increase in the number of international judicial bodies and dispute settlement and implementation control bodies; in their case-loads; and in the range and importance of the issues they are called upon to address. These factors reflect a new stage in the delivery of interna- tional justice. The International Courts and Tribunals series has been established to encourage the publication of independent and scholarly works which address, in critical and analytical fashion, the legal and policy aspects of the functioning of international courts and tribunals, including their institutional, substantive, and procedural aspects. In Whose Name? A Public Law Theory of International Adjudication Armin von Bogdandy and Ingo Venzke Translated from the German by Thomas Dunlap and revised by the authors •• 1 1 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, ox2 6dp, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © Armin von Bogdandy & Ingo Venzke 2014 The moral rights of the authors have been asserted First Edition published in 2014 Impression: 1 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. -
OSCE Yearbook 1998 Is, Overall, a Clear One: the Future Belongs to the OSCE
Contents Bronislaw Geremek Preface 11 Kurt P. Tudyka Foreword 13 Dieter S. Lutz Introduction 17 I. The Situation OSCE: Developments and Prospects Bronislaw Geremek The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe - Its Development and Prospects 27 Niels Helveg Petersen OSCE: Developments and Prospects 37 Nikolai Afanasievski The OSCE - The Present and Future of European Security 49 The Strengthening of the OSCE in the Light of NATO Enlargement Dieter S. Lutz Strengthen the OSCE - The Strengths of the OSCE 59 Kurt P. Tudyka The Quartet of European Institutions and Its Prospects 77 Adam Daniel Rotfeld European Security: The New Role of NATO and the OSCE 89 Pál Dunay Be Realistic: The OSCE Will Keep Confronting New Problems 119 5 The Interests and the Commitment of the OSCE States Janne Haaland Matlary The OSCE's Role in European Security - A Norwegian View 131 Nils Daag The New OSCE: From Words to Deeds - A Swedish View on the Past, the Present and the Future 139 Kari Möttölä Finland and the OSCE 145 Ginte Damušis Lithuania and the OSCE 165 II. Instruments, Responsibilities, Mechanisms and Procedures Conflict Prevention and Settlement of Disputes Franz Vranitzky The OSCE Presence in Albania 177 Jens Reuter Kosovo 1998 183 Elena Drozdik The Difficult Business of Perception - OSCE Observers in Croatia 195 Heinz Timmermann The OSCE Representation in Belarus 203 Herbert Grubmayr Problems and Difficulties of the OSCE's Long-Term Missions 217 6 Hansjörg Eiff Autonomy as a Method of Conflict Management and Protection of Minorities within