DOCSLIB.ORG

Railamerica, Inc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

RailAmerica, Inc. Dawn of a New Era in Railroading RailAmerica Corporate Video on CD RailAmerica, Inc. 5300 Broken Sound Boulevard NW 2000 Annual Report Boca Raton, Florida 33487 (561) 994-6015 www.railamerica.com CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS 5300 Broken Sound Boulevard NW Boca Raton, Florida 33487 (561) 994-6015 CORPORATE OFFICES (561) 994-4629 (facsimile) Corporate Headquarters Boca Raton, Florida Regional Office San Antonio, Texas REGISTRAR AND TRANSFER AGENT Regional Office San Francisco, California American Stock Transfer and Trust Company NORTH AMERICAN RAILROADS New York, New York Cape Breton & Central Nova Scotia Railway Stellarton, Nova Scotia, Canada (800) 937-5449 Carolina Piedmont Railroad Laurens, South Carolina Cascade & Columbia River Railroad Omak, Washington ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS Central Oregon & Pacific Railroad Roseburg, Oregon RailAmerica, Inc. June 22, 2001 at 10 a.m. EDT Central Railroad Company of Indiana Cincinnati, Ohio Boca Raton Marriott Hotel Central Railroad Company of Indianapolis Kokomo, Indiana (www.railamerica.com), 5150 Town Center Circle Central Western Railway Stettler, Alberta, Canada Boca Raton, Florida Chesapeake & Albemarle Railroad Elizabeth City, North Carolina the world’s largest short Connecticut Southern Railroad East Hartford, Connecticut line and regional rail- INVESTOR INQUIRIES Dakota Rail Hutchinson, Minnesota To receive copies of reports filed with the Dallas, Garland & Northeastern Railroad Garland, Texas road operator, owns 39 Securities and Exchange Commission or Esquimalt & Nanaimo Railway Nanaimo, Vancouver Island, Company Profile short line and regional other information about RailAmerica, contact British Columbia, Canada Wayne A. August, Assistant Vice President of Georgia Southwestern Railroad Smithville, Georgia railroads operating over Investor Relations, at the corporate offices, Goderich-Exeter Railway Kitchener, Ontario, Canada or email at [email protected]. Grand Rapids Eastern Railroad Grand Rapids, Michigan approximately 11,000 Huron & Eastern Railway Vassar, Michigan route miles in the United COMPANY WEBSITE Indiana & Ohio Rail Corporation Cincinnati, Ohio Visit our website at www.railamerica.com Indiana Southern Railroad Petersburg, Indiana States, Canada, Australia to obtain recent press releases, quarterly Lakeland & Waterways Railway Edmonton, Alberta, Canada reports and additional information about MacKenzie Northern Railway McLennan, Alberta, Canada and the Republic of Chile. RailAmerica, including how to receive a Michigan Shore Railroad Muskegon, Michigan In North America, the hard copy of our Annual Report, as well as Mid-Michigan Railroad Greenville, Michigan to sign up to receive Company information Missouri & Northern Arkansas Railroad Carthage, Missouri Company’s railroads via email. New England Central Railroad St. Albans, Vermont North Carolina & Virginia Railroad Ahoskie, North Carolina operate in 22 states and INDEPENDENT AUDITORS Ottawa Valley Railway North Bay, Ontario, Canada six Canadian provinces. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Otter Tail Valley Railroad Fergus Falls, Minnesota Fort Lauderdale, Florida Saginaw Valley Railway Vassar, Michigan Internationally, the San Diego & Imperial Valley Railroad San Diego, California Company operates an Company Information STOCK LISTING South Carolina Central Railroad Hartsville, South Carolina Nasdaq National Markett (NNM) Southern Ontario Railway Hamilton, Ontario, Canada additional 4,300 route Symbol: RAIL Texas-New Mexico Railroad Hobbs, New Mexico Texas Northeastern Railroad Garland, Texas miles under track access STOCK PRICE RANGE Toledo, Peoria & Western Railroad East Peoria, Illinois High Sales Low Sales Ventura County Railroad Port Hueneme, California arrangements in 2000 Price Price Virginia Southern Railroad Keysville, Virginia Australia and Argentina. Q1 $9.063 $5.750 West Texas & Lubbock Railroad Lubbock, Texas Designed by Curran & Connors, Inc. / www.curran-connors.com Q2 6.938 4.625 Q3 7.875 5.750 INTERNATIONAL RAILROADS Q4 8.000 5.688 Ferronor (Empresa de Transporte Ferroviario S.A.) Coquimbo, Chile High Sales Low Sales Freight Australia Melbourne, Australia 1999 Price Price Q1 $10.250 $7.688 Q2 10.313 8.750 Q3 10.750 9.125 Q4 9.938 7.063 Financial Highlights 1996-2000 ($ thousands, except earnings per share) 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 Income Statement Data Rail Operating Revenues $357,936 $129,818 $ 39,136 $24,496 $12,020 Rail Operating Income 70,034 25,279 5,781 3,365 2,529 Income from Continuing Operations 9,608 6,025 113 288 478 Diluted Earnings Per Share from Continuing Operations $0.49$ 0.43 $ 0.01 $ 0.02 $ 0.09 Pro forma(1) Diluted Earnings Per Share from Continuing Operations $0.74$ 0.43 $ 0.01 $ 0.02 $ 0.09 Net Income 11,661 9,921 4,401 1,939 505 Net Income Per Diluted Share $0.60$ 0.77 $ 0.45 $ 0.22 $ 0.10 Pro forma(1) Net Income Per Diluted Share $0.85$ 0.77 $ 0.45 $ 0.22 $ 0.10 Weighted Average Diluted Shares Outstanding 18,267 11,665 9,778 8,587 5,114 Balance Sheet Data Total Assets $839,703 $443,929 $130,964 $95,141 $65,215 Long-term Debt 358,856 162,827 66,327 47,603 37,788 Subordinated Debt 141,411 122,449 — 2,212 2,212 Stockholders’ Equity (incl. Preferred Stock) 130,047 78,297 41,642 26,814 15,992 (1) Pro forma for year 2000 special items consisting of acquisition-related costs, a non-cash foreign exchange loss and non- recurring asset sale gains, which combined result in an addback of $4.6 million after-tax, or $.25 per diluted share. Rail Operating Revenues EBITDA* Total Assets Stockholders ´ Equity (in millions) (in millions) (in millions) (in millions) $96.1 $839.7 $130.0 $357.9 $78.3 $443.9 $34.5 $129.8 $41.6 $131.0 $26.8 $39.1 $95.1 $8.3 $16.0 $65.2 $24.5 $5.2 $3.6 $12.0 ´00 ´00 ´00 ´00 ´99 ´99 ´99 ´99 ´98 ´98 ´98 ´98 ´97 ´97 ´97 ´97 ´96 ´96 ´96 ´96 *Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization 1 Chairman’s Letter With railroads being part of industrialized soci- rose 176 percent to $358 million, operating income ety for the past two centuries, one may find it hard to increased 177 percent to $70 million, EBITDA climbed believe that RailAmerica is bringing anything novel to 179 percent to $96 million and income from continu- railroading today, much less ushering in “a new dawn ing operations increased 59 percent to $10 million. in railroading.” Many have said that railroads are After the successful completion of our RailTex dinosaurs, an “old economy” business that has been acquisition in early 2000, we solidified our long-term losing market share and has outlasted their useful- capital structure. Working within the constraints of a ness—how could RailAmerica make such a daring tight credit market, we replaced three high interest statement in the face of such criticism of the industry? bridge loans with permanent financing. We success- The answer lies within the world’s largest and preem- fully consummated an institutional finance package inent short line and regional railroad operator and its consisting of $330 million in term loans and $50 million latest financial achievements, its talented management in a revolving credit facility. In addition, we com- team, its innovative approach to rail service, and pleted a high yield bond financing for $130 million in finally, its proven growth strategy. Combined, they a challenging capital market environment during the create a Company working to grow the business, help summer of 2000. These transactions allowed us to change the industry and enhance shareholder value. reduce future interest expense, enhance cash flow and solidify our balance sheet. 2000 Financial Achievements Recognizing the need to reduce debt incurred in RailAmerica continued its remarkable growth in 2000, connection with our acquisition activities over the achieving record revenues, carloads, operating income, past several years, management implemented a plan EBITDA and net income. Our carloads reached nearly to identify and monetize certain non-core, non-strategic 1.2 million, up 193 percent, while “same railroad” car- assets. This process produced proceeds from sales loads rose 9 percent over the prior year. Revenues and other transactions totaling over $120 million as of In 2000, RailAmerica celebrated our fifteenth year as a rail operator. The Company was formed in 1986 when we purchased the 83-mile Huron & Eastern Railroad (right) in Michigan from Class I carrier CSX. year-end 2000. Included in the assets sold were Kalyn/Siebert, Inc., our truck trailer manufacturing operations, five small railroads, our 26 percent minor- ity equity interest in Quebec Railway Corporation, and other non-operating real estate and non-essential track and rolling stock. To better utilize the value of our core rolling stock, we commenced the process of executing a total of approximately $150 million in off- balance sheet operating leases through the sale and leaseback of locomotives and railcars—completing $22 million of such transactions in December 2000. Through our asset rationalization and sale/ leaseback programs, we have been able to reduce our debt to equity ratio from over 5 times after the RailTex acquisition, to less than 3.7 times at December 31, 2000. Additionally, these programs have allowed us to increase our focus on our major, core railroads and generate significant cash proceeds, enabling us to fur- ther enhance shareholder value. Gary O. Marino Chairman, President & CEO Talented Management As we celebrate our fifteenth year of business at RailAmerica, I have always acknowledged our fine President & Chief Financial Officer. Gary, a 30-year management team and staff and how vital their contri- railroad veteran from CSX and Conrail, brings a butions have been, and will continue to be, in making wealth of rail operating expertise to our Company. this company a success. Bennett, a former KPMG partner with over 30 years The core of our management team has been of finance and accounting experience, is a highly together since our inception, but we have also respected executive who possesses solid business and enhanced the team with a corporate governance experi- number of experienced execu- ence.
Recommended publications
  • Reporting Marks

    Reporting Marks

    Lettres d'appellation / Reporting Marks AA Ann Arbor Railroad AALX Advanced Aromatics LP AAMX ACFA Arrendadora de Carros de Ferrocarril S.A. AAPV American Association of Private RR Car Owners Inc. AAR Association of American Railroads AATX Ampacet Corporation AB Akron and Barberton Cluster Railway Company ABB Akron and Barberton Belt Railroad Company ABBX Abbott Labs ABIX Anheuser-Busch Incorporated ABL Alameda Belt Line ABOX TTX Company ABRX AB Rail Investments Incorporated ABWX Asea Brown Boveri Incorporated AC Algoma Central Railway Incorporated ACAX Honeywell International Incorporated ACBL American Commercial Barge Lines ACCX Consolidation Coal Company ACDX Honeywell International Incorporated ACEX Ace Cogeneration Company ACFX General Electric Rail Services Corporation ACGX Suburban Propane LP ACHX American Cyanamid Company ACIS Algoma Central Railway Incorporated ACIX Great Lakes Chemical Corporation ACJR Ashtabula Carson Jefferson Railroad Company ACJU American Coastal Lines Joint Venture Incorporated ACL CSX Transportation Incorporated ACLU Atlantic Container Line Limited ACLX American Car Line Company ACMX Voith Hydro Incorporated ACNU AKZO Chemie B V ACOU Associated Octel Company Limited ACPX Amoco Oil Company ACPZ American Concrete Products Company ACRX American Chrome and Chemicals Incorporated ACSU Atlantic Cargo Services AB ACSX Honeywell International Incorporated ACSZ American Carrier Equipment ACTU Associated Container Transport (Australia) Limited ACTX Honeywell International Incorporated ACUU Acugreen Limited ACWR
  • 2.0 Current Freight Rail System and Services in Florida

    2.0 Current Freight Rail System and Services in Florida

    Investment Element of the 2010 Florida Rail System Plan 2.0 Current Freight Rail System and Services in Florida 2.1 Overview The Florida rail system is comprised of 2,786 miles of mainline track, which are owned by 15 operating line-haul railroads and terminal or switching companies, as well as 81 miles owned by the State of Florida. Florida’s rail system includes 2 Class I Railroads (CSX Transportation and Norfolk Southern Corporation), 1 Class II (Florida East Coast Railway), 11 Class III (Alabama and Gulf Coast Railway AN Railway, Bay Line Railroad, First Coast Railroad, Florida West Coast Railroad, Florida Central Railroad, Florida Midland Railroad, Florida Northern Railroad, Georgia and Florida Railway, Seminole Gulf Railway, and South Central Florida Express) and 1 railroad specializing in switching and terminals (Talleyrand Terminal).9 The largest operator in the State is CSX Transportation, which owns more than 53 percent of the statewide track mileage. In 2008, Florida’s railroads carried nearly 1.6 million carloads – 19 percent less than in 2006 – and approximately 83 million tons of freight, representing a 25 million ton (23 percent) decrease from 2006.10 During that year, railroads handled freight equivalent to roughly 5.0 million heavy trucks.11 Nonetheless, railroads continue to support thousands of jobs throughout the State and assist Florida’s industries to remain competitive with international and domestic markets for fertilizer, construction rock, consumer goods, paper products, processed 9 U.S. Class I Railroads are line-haul freight railroads with 2007 operating revenue in excess of $359.6 million (2006 operating revenues exceeding $346.7 million).
  • Baltimore and Ohio Rail Road

    Baltimore and Ohio Rail Road

    Baltimore and Ohio Rail Road BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAIL ROAD. Spec. law of MD, February 28, 1827 Trackage, June 30, 1918: 2315.039 mi. First main track 774.892 mi. Second and other main tracks 1580.364 mi. Yard track and sidings Equipment Steam locomotives 2,242 Other locomotives 9 Freight cars 88,904 Passenger cars 1,243 Floating equipment 168 Work equipment 2,392 Miscellaneous 10 Equipment, leased Steam locomotives 16 to Baltimore and Ohio Chicago Terminal Steam locomotives 1 to Little Kanawha Railroad Steam locomotives 4 to Long Fork Railway Steam locomotives 1 to Morgantown and Kingwood Steam locomotives 5 to The Sandy Valley & Elkhorn Railway Steam locomotives 6 to The Sharpsville Railroad Steam locomotives 30 to Staten Island Rapid Transit Steam locomotives 158 from Toledo and Cincinnati Freight cars 4 to Long Fork Railway Freight cars 5 to The Sandy Valley & Elkhorn Railway Freight cars 5,732 from Toledo and Cincinnati Freight cars 976 from Mather Humane Stock Transportation Co. Passenger cars 1 to Baltimore and Ohio Chicago Terminal Passenger cars 3 to Long Fork Railway Passenger cars 4 to The Sandy Valley & Elkhorn Railway Passenger cars 1 to The Sharpsville Railroad Passenger cars 110 from Toledo and Cincinnati Work equipment 2 to The Sandy Valley & Elkhorn Railway Work equipment 57 to Staten Island Rapid Transit Miscellaneous 2 from Toledo and Cincinnati Miscellaneous 1 from Baltimore and Ohio in Pennsylvania Miscellaneous 7 from Baltimore and Ohio Southwestern The Baltimore and Ohio Rail Road controls the following companies:
  • Transcontinental Railways and Canadian Nationalism Introduction Historiography

    Transcontinental Railways and Canadian Nationalism Introduction Historiography

    ©2001 Chinook Multimedia Inc. Page 1 of 22 Transcontinental Railways and Canadian Nationalism A.A. den Otter ©2001 Chinook Multimedia Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized duplication or distribution is strictly prohibited. Introduction The Canadian Pacific Railway (CPR) has always been a symbol of Canada's nation-building experience. Poets, musicians, politicians, historians, and writers have lauded the railway as one of the country's greatest achievements. Indeed, the transcontinental railway was a remarkable accomplishment: its managers, engineers, and workers overcame incredible obstacles to throw the iron track across seemingly impenetrable bogs and forests, expansive prairies, and nearly impassable mountains. The cost in money, human energy, and lives was enormous. Completed in 1885, the CPR was one of the most important instruments by which fledgling Canada realized a vision implicit in the Confederation agreement of 1867-the building of a nation from sea to sea. In the fulfilment of this dream, the CPR, and subsequently the Canadian Northern and Grand Trunk systems, allowed the easy interchange of people, ideas, and goods across a vast continent; they permitted the settlement of the Western interior and the Pacific coast; and they facilitated the integration of Atlantic Canada with the nation's heartland. In sum, by expediting commercial, political, and cultural intercourse among Canada's diverse regions, the transcontinentals in general, and the CPR in particular, strengthened the nation. Historiography The first scholarly historical analysis of the Canadian Pacific Railway was Harold Innis's A History of the Canadian Pacific Railway. In his daunting account of contracts, passenger traffic, freight rates, and profits, he drew some sweeping conclusions.
  • Michigan Railroads Association

    Michigan Railroads Association

    Michigan Railroads Association Local Surface Grade Crossing Railroad Contact list Mark Dobronski, President Tyler Delvaux, Assistant, SLE and Adrian & Blissfield Rail Road Trainmaster 734.641.2300 o Escanaba & Lake Superior Railroad [email protected] 906.786.0693 c [email protected] Steven M. Ayala, Roadmaster Ann Arbor Railroad Bob Anderson, SLE & Operations Manager 419.206.8172 c Escanaba & Lake Superior Railroad [email protected] 906.280.2513 o 906.542.3214 c Mark Dobronski, President [email protected] Charlotte Southern Railroad Company 734.641.2300 o Adam Robillard, Roadmaster [email protected] Grand Elk Railroad 269.762.9069 c Thomas Brasseur, Manager of Public Works [email protected] CN 248.452.4854 c Toby Tobias, AVP Engineering [email protected] Grand Rapids Eastern Railroad 855.793.7900 o Kevin T. Voss, Director – Track [email protected] Maintenance Conrail Mark Russell, Chief Engineer 856.231.2055 c Great Lakes Central [email protected] 231.775.2182 o 989.666.2706 c Amanda DeCesare, CSX Engineering [email protected] CSX Transportation 859.372.6124 o Luke Ziesemer, Roadmaster [email protected] Huron & Eastern Railroad 989.797.5129 c Mark Dobronski, President [email protected] Detroit Connecting Railroad Company 734.641.2300 o Scott Sandoval, AVP Engineering [email protected] Indiana & Ohio Railway 614.479.1863 o 231.233.9084 c [email protected] Mark Dobronski, President Toby Tobias, AVP Engineering Jackson & Lansing Railroad Company Michigan Shore Railroad 734.641.2300 o 855.793.7900 o [email protected] [email protected] Mark Pennell, Superintendent MOW Toby Tobias, AVP Engineering Lake State Railway Mid Michigan Railroad 989.393.9820 o 855.793.7900 o 989.529.6640 c [email protected] [email protected] Brent Emerson – Ft.
  • One Rail Australia Submission to ESCOSA

    One Rail Australia Submission to ESCOSA

    One Rail Australia Submission to ESCOSA One Rail Australia welcomes the invitation from ESCOSA to respond to the South Australian Rail Access Regime Review Issues Paper (February 2020). The review is timely given recent developments in the rail industry in South Australia, which are set out in detail below. Overall, our position is: • There is no compelling case to change the current regime significantly. • Whilst volumes on intrastate main lines continue to reduce, this has been driven by increased competition from road transport, rather than deficiencies in the access regime. • Other than lower volumes, there has been no significant change in the operation of the market since 2015, such that ESCOSA’s conclusions at the time supporting the continuation of the existing regime should have altered; • The current regime is a cost-effective way to provide protection to both access seekers and access providers in South Australia and provides certainty for all parties through the negotiation and arbitration framework; • ESCOSA reflects a fit-for-purpose regulator for the South Australian rail market given its size relative to the national regulated market which allows for efficient communication and resolution of issues; and • Changing to a national regime would be a costly process during transition and would raise regulatory compliance costs of all parties in the long run. It would also generate risks around the process of transition and there may be opportunity for other parties, such as national transport carriers, to exert market power. The rest of this submission sets out some information about One Rail Australia, an update on the South Australian freight transport industry, an overview of our perceptions of strengths and weaknesses of the current regime.
  • Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report

    Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report

    Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report Genesee & Wyoming Inc.*owns or leases 122 freight railroads worldwide that are organized into 10 operating regions with approximately 7,300 employees and 3,000 customers. * The terms “Genesee & Wyoming,” “G&W,” “the company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer collectively to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliated companies. Financial Highlights Years Ended December 31 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Statement of Operations Data Operating revenues $874,916 $1,568,643 $1,639,012 $2,000,401 $2,001,527 Operating income 190,322 380,188 421,571 384,261 289,612 Net income 52,433 271,296 261,006 225,037 141,096 Net income attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 48,058 269,157 260,755 225,037 141,137 Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. common stockholders: Diluted earnings per common share (EPS) $1.02 $4.79 $4.58 $3.89 $2.42 Weighted average shares - Diluted 51,316 56,679 56,972 57,848 58,256 Balance Sheet Data as of Period End Total assets $5,226,115 $5,319,821 $5,595,753 $6,703,082 $7,634,958 Total debt 1,858,135 1,624,712 1,615,449 2,281,751 2,359,453 Total equity 1,500,462 2,149,070 2,357,980 2,519,461 3,187,121 Operating Revenues Operating Income Net Income Diluted Earnings ($ In Millions) ($ In Millions) ($ In Millions) 421.61,2 Per Common Share 2 2,001.5 401.6 1 $2,000 2,000.4 $400 394.12 $275 271.3 $5.00 1 2 4.79 1 374.3 1 380.21 384.3 261.0 4.581 1,800 250 4.50 350 1,639.0 225.01 225 2 1 1,600 233.5 4.00 2 3.89 1,568.6 4.10 2 300 2 200 213.9 213.3 2 3.78 2 1,400 1 3.50 3.69 289.6 183.32 3.142 250 175 1,200 3.00 211.
  • Quarterly Rail Cost Adjustment Factor 70% Ownership Interest in Transrail 2 on February 3, 2012, in Docket No

    Quarterly Rail Cost Adjustment Factor 70% Ownership Interest in Transrail 2 on February 3, 2012, in Docket No

    Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 57 / Friday, March 23, 2012 / Notices 17121 Issued in Washington, DC, on March 20, The MG Principals will retain the Class RailAmerica et al. states that: (1) W&C 2012. B Common Units of TransRail, thereby does not connect with any of Jeffrey D. Wiese, retaining a 30% interest in TransRail, RailAmerica’s subsidiary railroads; (2) Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety. though they will not retain control or the proposed transaction is not part of [FR Doc. 2012–7080 Filed 3–22–12; 8:45 am] the power to control W&C. a series of anticipated transactions to BILLING CODE 4910–60–P Fortress’ noncarrier affiliate, RR connect W&C and any of RailAmerica’s Acquisition, currently owns about 60% subsidiary railroads; and (3) the of the publicly traded shares and proposed transaction does not involve a DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION controls the noncarrier RailAmerica, Class I rail carrier. The proposed which directly controls the noncarrier transaction is therefore exempt from the Surface Transportation Board Palm Beach, which directly controls the prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. [Docket No. FD 35605] noncarrier RTC. 11323 pursuant to 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(2). RailAmerica states that it controls the Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(g), the Board RailAmerica, Inc., Palm Beach Rail following Class III rail carriers: (1) may not use its exemption authority to Holding, Inc., RailAmerica Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway LLC; (2) relieve a rail carrier of its statutory Transportation Corp., RailTex, Inc., Arizona & California Railroad Company; obligation to protect the interests of its Fortress Investment Group, LLC, and (3) Bauxite & Northern Railway employees.
  • CP's North American Rail

    CP's North American Rail

    2020_CP_NetworkMap_Large_Front_1.6_Final_LowRes.pdf 1 6/5/2020 8:24:47 AM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Lake CP Railway Mileage Between Cities Rail Industry Index Legend Athabasca AGR Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway ETR Essex Terminal Railway MNRR Minnesota Commercial Railway TCWR Twin Cities & Western Railroad CP Average scale y y y a AMTK Amtrak EXO EXO MRL Montana Rail Link Inc TPLC Toronto Port Lands Company t t y i i er e C on C r v APD Albany Port Railroad FEC Florida East Coast Railway NBR Northern & Bergen Railroad TPW Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway t oon y o ork éal t y t r 0 100 200 300 km r er Y a n t APM Montreal Port Authority FLR Fife Lake Railway NBSR New Brunswick Southern Railway TRR Torch River Rail CP trackage, haulage and commercial rights oit ago r k tland c ding on xico w r r r uébec innipeg Fort Nelson é APNC Appanoose County Community Railroad FMR Forty Mile Railroad NCR Nipissing Central Railway UP Union Pacic e ansas hi alga ancou egina as o dmon hunder B o o Q Det E F K M Minneapolis Mon Mont N Alba Buffalo C C P R Saint John S T T V W APR Alberta Prairie Railway Excursions GEXR Goderich-Exeter Railway NECR New England Central Railroad VAEX Vale Railway CP principal shortline connections Albany 689 2622 1092 792 2636 2702 1574 3518 1517 2965 234 147 3528 412 2150 691 2272 1373 552 3253 1792 BCR The British Columbia Railway Company GFR Grand Forks Railway NJT New Jersey Transit Rail Operations VIA Via Rail A BCRY Barrie-Collingwood Railway GJR Guelph Junction Railway NLR Northern Light Rail VTR
  • View Detailed

    View Detailed

    C H A R L E V O I X Alpena Gaylord A N T R I M O T S E G O M O N T M O R E N C Y A L P E N A L E E L A N A U GLC G R A N D K A L K A S K A C R AW F O R D O S C O D A A L C O N A B E N Z I E T R AV E R S E L S R C M A N I S T E E W E X F O R D M I S S A U K E E O G E M AW L O S C O Lake Huron R O S C O M M O N Manistee Filer City Cadillac MICHIGAN Stronach C G R L A R E N A C S C L M A S O N L A K E O S C E O L A C L A R E G L A D W I N Ludington Walhalla Kinde Scottville Baldwin Pigeon H U R O N L Bad Axe Lake Michigan S Quarry R Elkton MQT C M I D L A N D B AY Ubly Sebewaing Ruth Essexville Auburn Akron O C E A N A N E WAY G O M E C O S TA I S A B E L L A Midland Bay City Palms Gilford Colling Monitor White Cloud Zilwaukee Munger Fairgrove Deckerville Fremont Carrollton T U S C O L A Buena Caro St Louis Wheeler Saginaw Vista Reese HESR Newaygo Denmark Jct MS Alma Gera S A N I L A C Grant M O N T C A L M Breckenridge Paines Vassar Berry Richville Marlette North Muskegon Hemlock S A G I N AW Arthur Millington Muskegon MMRR Croswell M U S K E G O N G R AT I O T K E N T L C GLC L S Muskegon Heights G R L A P E E R Brown Sparta C City G E N E S E E Fruitport C S T.
  • Michigan Railroads Association Jon Cool, President White Baraga 120 N

    Michigan Railroads Association Jon Cool, President White Baraga 120 N

    MICHIGAN’S RAIL SYSTEM KEWEENAW Give us a call... HOUGHTON 517.482.9413 Michigan Railroads Association Jon Cool, President WHITE BARAGA 120 N. Washington Sq., Suite 701 | Lansing, Michigan 48933 PINE ROCKLAND NESTORIA Michigan’s DUNCAN ELS CN P 517.482.9413 | F 517.482.9225 CN MRI ONTONAGON SIDNAW REPUBLIC [email protected] railroads are ready MINE LSI CN/LSI MARQUETTE GOGEBIC BARAGA LUCE michiganrailroadsassociation.com REPUBLIC to help you with your @MI_FreightRail ELS CN ELS MARQUETTE ALGER MUNISING NEWBERRY SAULT STE.MARIE CN development efforts. CN IRON CHANNING CN SCHOOLCRAFT CHIPPEWA ELS MACKINAC TROUT LAKE The following are economic ELS CN ANTOINE DELTA MANISTIQUE DICKINSON CN development contacts for IRON MOUNTAIN CN ESCANABA each railroad operating in Michigan. FAITHHORN CN POWERS EMMET michiganrailroadsassociation.com MENOMINEE CN CHEBOYGAN PETOSKEY PRESQUE ISLE MENOMINEE Adrian & Blissfield Rail Escanaba & Lake Superior CHARLEVOIX Road Co. Railroad GLC Mark W. Dobronski, President Thomas J. Klimek ELMIRA OTSEGO MONT- 38235 N. Executive Dr. Vice President Marketing ANTRIM MORECY ALPENA GAYLORD Westland, MI 48185 P.O. Box 85 Lapeer Industrial Railroad GLC ALPENA (p) 734.641.2300 (f) 734.641.2323 Mark W. Dobronski, President WILLIAMS- LSRC Green Bay, WI 54305 LEELANAU BURG [email protected] (p) 920.841.5062 38235 N. Executive Dr. GLC LSRC abrailroad.com [email protected] Westland, MI 48185 TRAVERSE KALKASKA CRAWFORD OSCODA ALCONA (p) 734.641.2300 (f) 734.641.2323 CITY GLC elsrr.com GRAND GRAYLING HARRISVILLE [email protected] GRAWN Amtrak BENZIE TRAVERSEGLC Derrick James, Director abrailroad.com Grand Elk Railroad WALTON JCT. Government Affairs-Central Damien Cantrell, General Manager MANISTEE LSRC OSCODA Marquette Rail LCC YUMA Chicago Union Station 75 Mills Street MISSAUKEE OGEMAW IOSCO Robert Bingham 500 W.
  • South Dakota's Railroads

    South Dakota's Railroads

    South Dakota’s Railroads South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office South Dakota’s Railroads: An Historic Context Prepared for: South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office 900 Governors Drive Pierre, South Dakota 57501 Prepared by: Mark Hufstetler and Michael Bedeau Renewable Technologies, Inc. 511 Metals Bank Bldg. Butte, Montana 59701 July 1998 Revised, December 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................................2 A. Purpose of this Document..............................................................................................2 B. Methodology ..................................................................................................................3 2. The Importance of Railroads to South Dakota ...........................................................................4 3. The History of Railroading in South Dakota..............................................................................5 A. Geographical Background .............................................................................................5 B. Establishment and Expansion: South Dakota Railroads in the Nineteenth Century......6 1. Beginnings (1851-1868) .....................................................................................6 2. The Little Dakota Boom and the First Railroads (1868-1873)...........................8 3. Railway Expansion During the Great Dakota Boom (1878-1887).....................9 4. The Impact and