MKCHELANGELO~S §JH[ADOW~ Gnjlkano BUGKARDKNK

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MKCHELANGELO~S §JH[ADOW~ Gnjlkano BUGKARDKNK MKCHELANGELO~S §JH[ADOW~ GnJLKANO BUGKARDKNK NORMAN E. LAND THOUGH HE WROTE of a host of painters, sculptors and architects in his Lives if the Artists (Florence, 1568), Giorgio Vasari focused on the best masters of the Italian Renaissance, among them Giotto, Donatello, Leonardo da Vinci and, above all, the hero of his book, Michelangelo. Still, he gave considerable attention to a number of other, less formidable artists, one of whom is the Florentine painter, Giuliano di Piero di Simone Bugiardini (1475-1554).1 Although there is an on-going and objective assessment of Bugiardini's life and works, scholars have not fully appreciated the figure of the artist in Vasari's Lives. 2 For Vasari, Bugiardini was a minor painter who did not play a leading role in the complex story of the progress of Renaissance art from its beginnings in the fourteenth century to its perfection in the sixteenth. Nevertheless, Bugiardini is an important figure in the Lives, for Vasari uses him to throw certain features of Michelangelo's character and personality into relief. Bugiardini is also significant because, for Vasari, he was an example of a particular kind of artistic personality. He was a simple man who was long on self-confidence but short on self-knowledge. Vasari's figure of Bugiardini reflects an actual person who was a friend and at times a close associate of Michelangelo and is often mentioned in documents related to him. For example, as early as April 1508, a famous letter alludes to what was to become a professional relationship between Bugiardini and Michelangelo. The latter, then in Rome, wrote to Francesco Granacci asking for some Florentine artists to assist him in painting the Sistine Chapel ceiling. Bugiardini was one of those hired by Granacci and sent to Rome (Ii Carteggio 1: 64-65,374- 78).3 Over twenty years later Michelangelo and Bugiardini were still associates. In a letter dated September 1531 to Bartolommeo Valori, Giovanni Battista Mini mentions that Michelangelo had visited him in EIRC31.1 (Summer 2005): 1-18 E. 2 EXPLORATIONS IN RENAISSANCE CULTURE the company of Bugiardini and Antonio Mini, Giovanni's nephew (II Carteggio 3: 329-30). On October 8 of the same year, Giovanni Mini again wrote to Valori from Florence about Michelangelo and again mentions Bugiardini, who was working on a painting representing the abduction of Dina Gacob's daughter). This most worthy work, Mini says, had been designed by Fra Bartolommeo, and Michelangelo could not stop praising it (Gaye 2: 231).4 There is also a letter, dated in the fall of 1532, from Bugiardini to Michelangelo about a comet the former had seen and drawn. Interestingly, Michelangelo wrote drafts of three poems to Tommaso Cavalieri on this letter, suggesting that he kept it close at hand (II Carteggio 3: 433). Later, Michelangelo sent several letters that refer to Bugiardini from Rome to his nephew Lionardo Buonarroti. On September 24, 1547 Michelangelo instructed Lionardo to ask Messer Giovan Francesco to commend him to Bugiardini, "if he is alive" (II Carteggio 4: 276). This letter suggests that Bugiardini might have been seriously ill or injured or perhaps that Michelangelo had not seen his friend for a good while. In any case, a year later Michelangelo sent a cover letter to Lionardo in which was enclosed another letter written directly to Bugiardini (II Carteggio 4:304).Then, on April 13, 1549, Michelangelo wrote to Lionardo telling him not to include letters from other people with his own, adding in explanation "Bugiardini is a good person, but a simple man" (II Carteggio 4: 321-22).5 Vasari surely noticed the several ways in which the actual circumstances of the lives of Michelangelo and Bugiardini followed a similar course.6 For example, he knew that, like Michelangelo who was a native of Caprese, Bugiardini was born outside Florence, near the Porta a Faenza, and although he does not specifically say as much, he must have realized that the two artists were born within the same year. More importantly, Vasari was aware that Bugiardini's early artistic education was virtually the same as that received by Michelangelo. When they were young artists, they assisted Domenico Ghirlandaio in painting his frescoes in the Cappella Maggiore in S. Maria Novella, and both studied with Bertoldo di Giovanni in the Medici sculpture garden next to the Piazza di San Marco. 7 Still, as the reader of Bugiardini's vita soon understands, Vasari was interested in more than simply recounting the bare facts of the painter'S existence. .
Recommended publications
  • The Master of the Unruly Children and His Artistic and Creative Identities
    The Master of the Unruly Children and his Artistic and Creative Identities Hannah R. Higham A Thesis Submitted to The University of Birmingham For The Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Art History, Film and Visual Studies School of Languages, Art History and Music College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham May 2015 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This thesis examines a group of terracotta sculptures attributed to an artist known as the Master of the Unruly Children. The name of this artist was coined by Wilhelm von Bode, on the occasion of his first grouping seven works featuring animated infants in Berlin and London in 1890. Due to the distinctive characteristics of his work, this personality has become a mainstay of scholarship in Renaissance sculpture which has focused on identifying the anonymous artist, despite the physical evidence which suggests the involvement of several hands. Chapter One will examine the historiography in connoisseurship from the late nineteenth century to the present and will explore the idea of the scholarly “construction” of artistic identity and issues of value and innovation that are bound up with the attribution of these works.
    [Show full text]
  • Michelangelo Buonarroti Artstart – 3 Dr
    Michelangelo Buonarroti ArtStart – 3 Dr. Hyacinth Paul https://www.hyacinthpaulart.com/ The genius of Michelangelo • Renaissance era painter, sculptor, poet & architect • Best documented artist of the 16th century • He learned to work with marble, a chisel & a hammer as a young child in the stone quarry’s of his father • Born 6th March, 1475 in Caprese, Florence, Italy • Spent time in Florence, Bologna & Rome • Died in Rome 18th Feb 1564, Age 88 Painting education • Did not like school • 1488, age 13 he apprenticed for Domenico Ghirlandaio • 1490-92 attended humanist academy • Worked for Bertoldo di Giovanni Famous paintings of Michelangelo The Sistine Chapel Ceiling – (1508-12) Vatican, Rome Famous paintings of Michelangelo Doni Tondo (Holy Family) (1506) – Uffizi, Florence Famous paintings of Michelangelo The Creation of Adam (1508-12) – Vatican, Rome Famous paintings of Michelangelo The Last Judgement - (1508-12) – Vatican, Rome Famous paintings of Michelangelo Ignudo (1509) – Vatican, Rome Famous paintings of Michelangelo The Drunkenness of Noah - (1508-12) – Vatican, Rome Famous paintings of Michelangelo The Deluge - (1508-12) – Vatican, Rome Famous paintings of Michelangelo The First day of creation - - (1508-12) – Vatican, Rome Famous paintings of Michelangelo The Prophet Jeremiah - (1508-12) – Vatican, Rome Famous paintings of Michelangelo The last Judgement - (1508-12) – Vatican, Rome Famous paintings of Michelangelo The Crucifixion of St. Peter - (1546-50) – Vatican, Rome Only known Self Portrait Famous paintings of Michelangelo
    [Show full text]
  • THE BERNARD and MARY BERENSON COLLECTION of EUROPEAN PAINTINGS at I TATTI Carl Brandon Strehlke and Machtelt Brüggen Israëls
    THE BERNARD AND MARY BERENSON COLLECTION OF EUROPEAN PAINTINGS AT I TATTI Carl Brandon Strehlke and Machtelt Brüggen Israëls GENERAL INDEX by Bonnie J. Blackburn Page numbers in italics indicate Albrighi, Luigi, 14, 34, 79, 143–44 Altichiero, 588 Amsterdam, Rijksmuseum catalogue entries. (Fig. 12.1) Alunno, Niccolò, 34, 59, 87–92, 618 Angelico (Fra), Virgin of Humility Alcanyiç, Miquel, and Starnina altarpiece for San Francesco, Cagli (no. SK-A-3011), 100 A Ascension (New York, (Milan, Brera, no. 504), 87, 91 Bellini, Giovanni, Virgin and Child Abbocatelli, Pentesilea di Guglielmo Metropolitan Museum altarpiece for San Nicolò, Foligno (nos. 3379 and A3287), 118 n. 4 degli, 574 of Art, no. 1876.10; New (Paris, Louvre, no. 53), 87 Bulgarini, Bartolomeo, Virgin of Abbott, Senda, 14, 43 nn. 17 and 41, 44 York, Hispanic Society of Annunciation for Confraternità Humility (no. A 4002), 193, 194 n. 60, 427, 674 n. 6 America, no. A2031), 527 dell’Annunziata, Perugia (Figs. 22.1, 22.2), 195–96 Abercorn, Duke of, 525 n. 3 Alessandro da Caravaggio, 203 (Perugia, Galleria Nazionale Cima da Conegliano (?), Virgin Aberdeen, Art Gallery Alesso di Benozzo and Gherardo dell’Umbria, no. 169), 92 and Child (no. SK–A 1219), Vecchietta, portable triptych del Fora Crucifixion (Claremont, Pomona 208 n. 14 (no. 4571), 607 Annunciation (App. 1), 536, 539 College Museum of Art, Giovanni di Paolo, Crucifixion Abraham, Bishop of Suzdal, 419 n. 2, 735 no. P 61.1.9), 92 n. 11 (no. SK-C-1596), 331 Accarigi family, 244 Alexander VI Borgia, Pope, 509, 576 Crucifixion (Foligno, Palazzo Gossaert, Jan, drawing of Hercules Acciaioli, Lorenzo, Bishop of Arezzo, Alexeivich, Alexei, Grand Duke of Arcivescovile), 90 Kills Eurythion (no.
    [Show full text]
  • “Unlucky in Affairs of Business….” Turning Points in the Life of Lorenzo
    “Unlucky in affairs of business….” Turning Points in the life of Lorenzo de Medici Harry Don Stephenson, Jr. Faculty Advisor: Thomas Robisheaux, Ph.D. Fred W. Schaffer Professor of History History Department November 2015 This project was submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Graduate Liberal Studies Program in the Graduate School of Duke University. Copyright by Harry Don Stephenson, Jr. 2015 i Contents Abstract ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…iii List of Tables and Figures ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….…iv Acknowledgements …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..v Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………1 Chapter One: Banking in Fifteenth Century Italy………………………………………………………………………. 5 Chapter Two: Family Tree ………………………………………………………………………………………………………...12 Chapter Three: Lorenzo in Rome – 1466 ………………………………………………………………………………….. 30 Chapter Four: The Pazzi Conspiracy- April 1478 ………………………………………………………………………. 36 Chapter Five: The Pazzi War – 1479-1480 ………………………………………………………………………………….50 Chapter Six: Restoration with Rome - 1488 …………………………………………………………………………….. 59 Chapter Seven: Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 66 Bibliography ii Abstract The Medici family name is inextricably tied to Florence and the Italian Renaissance. For three hundred and fifty years, through twelve generations, the Medici lived in, work in, and to a considerable degree ruled the city. No Medici name rises higher in recorded history than Lorenzo di Piero de’ Medici. Lorenzo il Magnifico is remembered as a patron of the arts, poet, humanist, diplomat and savior of Florence during the Pazzi War. His legacy as a competent banker, manager and caretaker of the family business empire is sadly much less triumphant. Through the “quirks of genealogical fortune”, including a string of untimely deaths of male members of the Medici, Lorenzo found himself to be the sole owner of the Medici Bank in its sixth decade of business.
    [Show full text]
  • Michelangelo Buonarotti
    MICHELANGELO BUONAROTTI Portrait of Michelangelo by Daniele da Volterra COMPILED BY HOWIE BAUM Portrait of Michelangelo at the time when he was painting the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel. by Marcello Venusti Hi, my name is Michelangelo di Lodovico Buonarroti Simoni, but you can call me Michelangelo for short. MICHAELANGO’S BIRTH AND YOUTH Michelangelo was born to Leonardo di Buonarrota and Francesca di Neri del Miniato di Siena, a middle- class family of bankers in the small village of Caprese, in Tuscany, Italy. He was the 2nd of five brothers. For several generations, his Father’s family had been small-scale bankers in Florence, Italy but the bank failed, and his father, Ludovico di Leonardo Buonarroti Simoni, briefly took a government post in Caprese. Michelangelo was born in this beautiful stone home, in March 6,1475 (546 years ago) and it is now a museum about him. Once Michelangelo became famous because of his beautiful sculptures, paintings, and poetry, the town of Caprese was named Caprese Michelangelo, which it is still named today. HIS GROWING UP YEARS BETWEEN 6 AND 13 His mother's unfortunate and prolonged illness forced his father to place his son in the care of his nanny. The nanny's husband was a stonecutter, working in his own father's marble quarry. In 1481, when Michelangelo was six years old, his mother died yet he continued to live with the pair until he was 13 years old. As a child, he was always surrounded by chisels and stone. He joked that this was why he loved to sculpt in marble.
    [Show full text]
  • 182 MICHAELANGELO's Shadow: GUILIANO BUGIARDINI
    MICHAeLANGeLO’S SHADOW: GUILIANO BUGIARDINI NORMAN E. LAND THOUGH he wrote of a host of painters, sculptors and architects in his Lives of the Artists (Florence, 1568), Giorgio Vasari focused on the best masters of the Italian Renaissance, among them Giotto, Donatello, Leonardo da Vinci and, above all, the hero of his book, Michelangelo. Still, he gave considerable atten- tion to a number of other, less formidable artists, one of whom is the Florentine painter, Giuliano di Piero di Simone Bugiardini (1475–1554).1 Although there is an on-going and objective assessment of Bugiardini’s life and works, scholars have not fully appreciated the figure of the artist in Vasari’s Lives.2 For Vasari, Bugiar- dini was a minor painter who did not play a leading role in the complex story of the progress of Renaissance art from its beginnings in the fourteenth century to its perfection in the sixteenth. Nevertheless, Bugiardini is an important figure in the Lives, for Vasari uses him to throw certain features of Michelangelo’s character and personality into relief. Bugiardini is also significant because, for Vasari, he was an example of a particular kind of artistic personality. He was a simple man who was long on self-confidence but short on self-knowledge. Vasari’s figure of Bugiardini reflects an actual person who was a friend and at times a close associate of Michelangelo and is often mentioned in documents re- lated to him. For example, as early as April 1508, a famous letter alludes to what was to become a professional relationship between Bugiardini and Michelangelo.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Alert: Frick to Present the First Exhibition on Florentine Sculptor Bertoldo Di Giovanni
    MEDIA ALERT: FRICK TO PRESENT THE FIRST EXHIBITION ON FLORENTINE SCULPTOR BERTOLDO DI GIOVANNI LONG IDENTIFIED AS A STUDENT OF DONATELLO AND INSTRUCTOR OF MICHELANGELO, BERTOLDO IS REDEFINED IN TERMS OF HIS DISTINCT STYLE AND ACHIEVEMENTS September 18, 2019, through January 12, 2020 Next fall The Frick Collection will present the first exhibition to focus on the Florentine sculptor Bertoldo di Giovanni (ca. 1440–1491). This monographic display of more than twenty statues, reliefs, medals, and statuettes will bring together the artist’s entire extant oeuvre and is exclusive to the New York City institution, which owns the only sculptural figure by the artist outside of Europe. This comprehensive exhibition will offer the first chance to fully explore longstanding questions of attribution, function, groupings, and intended display. The exhibition of Bertoldo’s artistic production in bronze, wood, and terracotta will highlight the ingenuity of the sculptor’s design across media. A number of objects that share common iconography will be included, displayed in a way that will shed light on his creative process, which has puzzled scholars for the past century. Bertoldo di Giovanni: The Renaissance Bertoldo di Giovanni (ca. 1440–1491), Shield Bearer, early 1470s, gilded bronze, The Frick Collection of Sculpture in Medici Florence, follows a series of acclaimed Frick shows on Renaissance sculptors and is organized by Aimee Ng, Associate Curator; Alexander J. Noelle, Anne L. Poulet Curatorial Fellow; and Xavier F. Salomon, Peter Jay Sharp Chief Curator; with the assistance of Julia Day, Associate Conservator, who has been coordinating and conducting an extensive scientific analysis of the objects.
    [Show full text]
  • Mining Authoritativeness in Art Historical Photo Archives. Semantic Web Applications for Connoisseurship
    Alma Mater Studiorum · Università di Bologna DOTTORATO DI RICERCA IN Culture Letterarie e Filologiche Ciclo XXXI Settore Concorsuale: 11/A4 (primario); 01/B1 (secondario) Settore Scientifico Disciplinare: M-STO/08 Mining Authoritativeness in Art Historical Photo Archives. Semantic Web Applications for Connoisseurship Presentata da: Marilena Daquino Coordinatore Dottorato: Supervisore: Prof. Luciano Formisano Prof.ssa Francesca Tomasi Esame finale anno 2019 Abstract The purpose of this work is threefold: (i) to facilitate knowledge discovery in art historical photo archives, (ii) to support users’ decision-making process when evaluating contradictory artwork attributions, and (iii) to provide policies for information quality improvement in art historical photo archives. The ap- proach is to leverage Semantic Web technologies in order to aggregate, assess, and recommend the most documented authorship attributions. In particular, findings of this work offer art historians an aid forre- trieving relevant sources, assessing textual authoritativeness (i.e. internal grounds) of sources of attribution, and evaluating cognitive authoritativeness of cited scholars. At the same time, the retrieval process allows art historical data providers to define a low-cost data integration process to update and enrich their collection data. The contributions of this thesis are the following: (1) a methodology for representing question- able information by means of ontologies; (2) a conceptual framework of Information Quality measures addressing dimensions of textual and cognitive authoritativeness characterising art historical data, (3) a number of policies for metadata quality improvement in art historical photo archives as derived from the application of the framework, (4) a ranking model leveraging the conceptual framework, (5) a semantic crawler, called mAuth, that harvests authorship attributions in the Web of Data, and (6) an API and a Web Application to serve information to applications and final users for consuming data.
    [Show full text]
  • MICHELE DI GIOVANNI DA FIESOLE and the ORIGINS of the FLORENTINE PLAQUETTE by Michael Riddick Fig
    MICHELE DI GIOVANNI DA FIESOLE AND THE ORIGINS OF THE FLORENTINE PLAQUETTE by Michael Riddick Fig. 01: Virgin and Child within an Arch here attributed to Michele di Giovanni da Fiesole, bronze, ca. 1445-54, Florence, Italy (Wallace Collection, UK) Michele di Giovanni da Fiesole Michael Riddick - RenBronze.com and the origins of the Florentine plaquette 2 Michele di Giovanni da Fiesole and the origins of the Florentine plaquette A large rectangular relief of the Virgin and Child Italian Renaissance. As suggested by their subject within an Arch (Fig. 01) and a smaller arched relief and scale, both reliefs were intended for private of the Virgin and Child within a Niche (Fig. 02) devotional use. The larger relief could stand-alone are recognized as two of the earliest sculptural or may have served as the central panel for a house productions of what is today considered the genre altar.1 In one instance, it was appropriated as a of plaquettes, being the reproductive casting of tabernacle door.2 The smaller relief is unanimously small reliefs in metal with an origin in the early recognized as intended for use on paxes, to be set into a frame and used during the liturgy. Both reliefs show a distinct awareness of Donatello’s inventions. Douglas Lewis notes their rilievo schiacciato, a sophisticated technique of low-relief sculpture invented and popularized by Donatello.3 The larger relief reflects Donatello’s anatomical typology for the child Christ4 while the disappearance of the child’s arm behind the Virgin recalls an early relief portraying the Virgin and Child Christ within a Mantle attributed to a young Donatello or sometimes credited to Lorenzo Ghiberti.5 The architectural motif of the Virgin and Child within an Arch is frequently noted for its reflection of Donatello’s use of antique architecture to add perspectival depth to the scene, as noted and compared against his bronze relief of the Feast of Herod for the Baptistery Font Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Art of Sandro Botticelli And
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE ANTIQUITY AND THE SISTINE SOJOURN (1481-1482) IN THE ART OF SANDRO BOTTICELLI AND DOMENICO GHIRLANDAIO Volume 1 A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Art by Max Calvin Marmor May, 1982 ~ • I The Thesis of Max Calvin Marmor is approved: anne L. Trabold, Ph.D. California State University, Northridge i i This thesis is dedicated to the immortal words of Ibn Abad Sina "Seek not gold in shallow vessels!" (Contra Alchemia, Praefatio) iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks are due my thesis committee for allowing a maverick to go his own way. Without their contributions, this experience would not have been what it has been. More could be said on this score but, to quote the Devil (whose advice I should have followed from the outset): "Mach es kurz! Am Juengsten Tag ist's nur ein F--z!" So I'll "make it short." I owe special thanks to Dr. Birgitta Wohl, who initially persuaded me that higher education is worthwhile; who expressed unfailing interest in my ideas and progress; and who, throughout, has provided a unique living example of wide learning and humanistic scholarship. Finally, this thesis could not have been written without the ever prompt, ever courteous services of the CSUN Library Inter-Library Loan Department. Thanks to Charlotte (in her many roles}, to Misha and their myriad elves, who, for an unconscionably long time, made every day Christmas! iv CONTENTS Page LIST 01'' FIGURES . vii ABSTRACT . ix Chapter INTRODUCTION: CONTEXT AND CRISIS IN THE REVIVAL OF ANTIQUITY.
    [Show full text]
  • Lives of the Most Eminent Painters Sculptors and Architects
    Lives of the Most Eminent Painters Sculptors and Architects Giorgio Vasari Lives of the Most Eminent Painters Sculptors and Architects Table of Contents Lives of the Most Eminent Painters Sculptors and Architects.......................................................................1 Giorgio Vasari..........................................................................................................................................2 LIFE OF FILIPPO LIPPI, CALLED FILIPPINO...................................................................................9 BERNARDINO PINTURICCHIO........................................................................................................13 LIFE OF BERNARDINO PINTURICCHIO.........................................................................................14 FRANCESCO FRANCIA.....................................................................................................................17 LIFE OF FRANCESCO FRANCIA......................................................................................................18 PIETRO PERUGINO............................................................................................................................22 LIFE OF PIETRO PERUGINO.............................................................................................................23 VITTORE SCARPACCIA (CARPACCIO), AND OTHER VENETIAN AND LOMBARD PAINTERS...........................................................................................................................................31
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the Medici Portrait: from Business to Politics
    THE EVOLUTION OF THE MEDICI PORTRAIT: FROM BUSINESS TO POLITICS A Thesis Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies College of Arts and Sciences of John Carroll University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts By Mark J. Danford Spring, 2013 This thesis of Mark Danford is hereby accepted ________________________________________ ____________________ Reader – Dr. Edward Olszewski Date ________________________________________ ____________________ Reader – Dr. Brenda Wirkus Date ________________________________________ ____________________ Advisor – Dr. Linda Koch Date I certify that this is the original document ________________________________________ ____________________ Author – Mark J. Danford Date Acknowledgements There are many people I would like to thank for their encouragement and support during my graduate studies. I would like to thank the following people at John Carroll University: Dr. William Francis Ryan for introducing me to the Humanities Program; Dr. Brenda Wirkus for advising me and working with my hectic schedule so that I could complete my studies; and Dr. Linda Koch for providing me with an excellent foundation in the field of Art History as well as taking the extra time out of her schedule in order to be my thesis advisor. I would also like to thank Dr. Edward Olszewski from Case Western Reserve University for agreeing to be an additional reader of my thesis and offering his expertise concerning Florence and the Medici. I would like to thank the following people for making my research a little easier and offering me access to the curatorial files in their respective institutions: Andrea Mall from Registration at the Toledo Museum of Art; Anne Halpern from the Department of Curatorial Records at the National Gallery of Art; and Jennifer Vanim from the department of European Painting & Sculpture before 1900 at the Philadelphia Museum of Art.
    [Show full text]