The Charm of the Chiltern Hills
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Lowland Calcareous Grassland Habitat Action Plan
Buckinghamshire & Milton Keynes Biodiversity Action Plan Lowland Calcareous Grassland Habitat Action Plan Lowland Calcareous Grassland Key associated species Chalk Carpet Moth Chalkhill Blue Chiltern Gentian Duke of Burgundy Early Gentian Glow Worm Green Hairstreak Hornet Robber Fly Horseshoe Vetch Juniper Linnet Meadow Clary Pasque Flower Roman Snail Silver-spotted Skipper Snail Abida secale Stone Curlew Striped Lychnis Moth Yellow Meadow Ant This habitat includes all semi-improved grassland and unimproved grassland occurring on shallow lime-rich soils normally underlain by chalk or limestone rocks. Calcareous grassland is associated with distinct topographic features such as escarpments or dry valley slopes and ancient earth works. Lowland calcareous grassland supports a very rich flora with many nationally rare and scarce species together with a diverse invertebrate fauna such as Chalkhill Blue and Duke of Burgundy butterflies. Scrub, such as Juniper and Box, is associated with calcareous grassland and contributes to local biodiversity. 1 Current status in the UK Biological status 1.1 Calcareous grassland is a rich grassland type in terms of the diversity of plant and invertebrate species supported. Many species are confined to calcareous grassland in the UK, including those that are on the northern edge of their European range. 1.2 Lowland calcareous grasslands are defined by the UK Biodiversity Group as the first nine communities in the National Vegetation Classification CG grouping. These communities are largely restricted to the warmer and drier climate of southern and eastern areas of the UK. 1.3 The amount of calcareous grassland has undergone a significant decline over the last 50 years. Although there are no detailed figures available for the UK as a whole, local statistics demonstrate the overall decline eg 50% lost in Dorset between the mid-1950s and the early 1990s, 25% lost in Sussex between 1966 and 1980. -
Indiana Comprehensive Wildlife Strategy 2
Developed for: The State of Indiana, Governor Mitch Daniels Department of Natural Resources, Director Kyle Hupfer Division of Fish and Wildlife, Director Glen Salmon By: D. J. Case and Associates 317 E. Jefferson Blvd. Mishawaka, IN 46545 (574)-258-0100 With the Technical and Conservation information provided by: Biologists and Conservation Organizations throughout the state Project Coordinator: Catherine Gremillion-Smith, Ph.D. Funded by: State Wildlife Grants U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Indiana Comprehensive Wildlife Strategy 2 Indiana Comprehensive Wildlife Strategy 3 Indiana Comprehensive Wildlife Strategy 4 II. Executive Summary The Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Fish and Wildlife (DFW) working with conservation partners across the state, developed a Comprehensive Wildlife Strategy (CWS) to protect and conserve habitats and associated wildlife at a landscape scale. Taking advantage of Congressional guidance and nationwide synergy Congress recognized the importance of partnerships and integrated conservation efforts, and charged each state and territory across the country to develop similar strategies. To facilitate future comparisons and cross-boundary cooperation, Congress required all 50 states and 6 U.S. territories to simultaneously address eight specific elements. Congress also directed that the strategies must identify and be focused on the “species in greatest need of conservation,” yet address the “full array of wildlife” and wildlife-related issues. Throughout the process, federal agencies and national organizations facilitated a fruitful ongoing discussion about how states across the country were addressing wildlife conservation. States were given latitude to develop strategies to best meet their particular needs. Congress gave each state the option of organizing its strategy by using a species-by-species approach or a habitat- based approach. -
Biodiversity and Planning in Buckinghamshire
Biodiversity and Planning in Buckinghamshire Version 2. March 2014 Contents Section 1 1a About this guidance ......................................................................................................................3 WHO IS THIS Protecting and enhancing Buckinghamshire’s biodiversity ...............................3 How to use this guidance ................................................................................................3 GUIDANCE FOR? 1b Biodiversity in the planning process .......................................................................................4 This guidance should be helpful if 1c Information requirements ...........................................................................................................5 you are: Section 2 n a planning officer in either 2a Internationally and nationally designated sites ..................................................................6 policy or development 2b Legally protected species ............................................................................................................8 management; Section 3 n writing a Neighbourhood Plan; 3 Local sites and priority habitats and species ........................................................................11 3a Local Sites ..........................................................................................................................................12 n going to be submitting a 3b Irreplaceable Habitats ...................................................................................................................14 -
Keystone Ancient Forest Preserve Resource Management Plan 2011
Keystone Ancient Forest Preserve Resource Management Plan 2011 Osage County & Tulsa County, Oklahoma Lowell Caneday, Ph.D. With Kaowen (Grace) Chang, Ph.D., Debra Jordan, Re.D., Michael J. Bradley, and Diane S. Hassell This page intentionally left blank. 2 Acknowledgements The authors acknowledge the assistance of numerous individuals in the preparation of this Resource Management Plan. On behalf of the Oklahoma Tourism and Recreation Department’s Division of State Parks, staff members were extremely helpful in providing access to information and in sharing of their time. In particular, this assistance was provided by Deby Snodgrass, Kris Marek, and Doug Hawthorne – all from the Oklahoma City office of the Oklahoma Tourism and Recreation Department. However, it was particularly the assistance provided by Grant Gerondale, Director of Parks and Recreation for the City of Sand Springs, Oklahoma, that initiated the work associated with this RMP. Grant provided a number of documents, hosted an on-site tour of the Ancient Forest, and shared his passion for this property. It is the purpose of the Resource Management Plan to be a living document to assist with decisions related to the resources within the park and the management of those resources. The authors’ desire is to assist decision-makers in providing high quality outdoor recreation experiences and resources for current visitors, while protecting the experiences and the resources for future generations. Lowell Caneday, Ph.D., Professor Leisure Studies Oklahoma State University Stillwater, -
Statutory Contaminated Land Strategy
Aylesbury Vale District Council : Contaminated Land Strategy : July 2001 Aylesbury Vale District Council Statutory Contaminated Land Strategy Required under the provisions of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 Section 78B Rachel Christie Head of Environmental Health Services PO Box 459 Aylesbury HP20 1YW Fax (01296) 585674 DX 4130 Aylesbury www.aylesburyvaledc.gov.uk Visitors please call at 66 High Street Aylesbury 1 Aylesbury Vale District Council : Contaminated Land Strategy : July 2001 Contents Page Introduction & Overview i.1 Background to the legislation 4 i.2 Explanation of terms 5 i.3 National objectives of the new regime 6 i.4 Local objectives 7 i.5 About this strategy 8 i.6 Roles and responsibilities 9 i.7 Outline of the statutory procedure 9 i.8 Situations where this regime does not apply 11 i.9 Land under the ownership of the enforcing authority 13 i.10 The need for team working 13 i.11 Financial and manpower implications 14 The Strategy Part 1 - Description of the Aylesbury Vale Council area and how its 15 particular characteristics impact on the inspection strategy Part 2 - Identification of potentially contaminated sites and their 23 prioritisation according to risk Part 3 - Obtaining further information on pollutant linkages and 27 the risk assessment process Part 4 - The written record of determination and formal notification 31 Part 5 - Liability and enforcement 33 Part 6 - Data handling and access to information 36 Part 7 - Quality control, performance indicators and arrangements 38 for review Part 8 - Projected costs -
MOTH CHECKLIST Species Listed Are Those Recorded on the Wetland to Date
Version 4.0 Nov 2015 Map Ref: SO 95086 46541 MOTH CHECKLIST Species listed are those recorded on the Wetland to date. Vernacular Name Scientific Name New Code B&F No. MACRO MOTHS 3.005 14 Ghost Moth Hepialus humulae 3.001 15 Orange Swift Hepialus sylvina 3.002 17 Common Swift Hepialus lupulinus 50.002 161 Leopard Moth Zeuzera pyrina 54.008 169 Six-spot Burnet Zygaeba filipendulae 66.007 1637 Oak Eggar Lasiocampa quercus 66.010 1640 The Drinker Euthrix potatoria 68.001 1643 Emperor Moth Saturnia pavonia 65.002 1646 Oak Hook-tip Drepana binaria 65.005 1648 Pebble Hook-tip Drepana falcataria 65.007 1651 Chinese Character Cilix glaucata 65.009 1653 Buff Arches Habrosyne pyritoides 65.010 1654 Figure of Eighty Tethia ocularis 65.015 1660 Frosted Green Polyploca ridens 70.305 1669 Common Emerald Hermithea aestivaria 70.302 1673 Small Emerald Hemistola chrysoprasaria 70.029 1682 Blood-vein Timandra comae 70.024 1690 Small Blood-vein Scopula imitaria 70.013 1702 Small Fan-footed Wave Idaea biselata 70.011 1708 Single-dotted Wave Idaea dimidiata 70.016 1713 Riband Wave Idaea aversata 70.053 1722 Flame Carpet Xanthorhoe designata 70.051 1724 Red Twin-spot Carpet Xanthorhoe spadicearia 70.049 1728 Garden Carpet Xanthorhoe fluctuata 70.061 1738 Common Carpet Epirrhoe alternata 70.059 1742 Yellow Shell Camptogramma bilineata 70.087 1752 Purple Bar Cosmorhoe ocellata 70.093 1758 Barred Straw Eulithis (Gandaritis) pyraliata 70.097 1764 Common Marbled Carpet Chloroclysta truncata 70.085 1765 Barred Yellow Cidaria fulvata 70.100 1776 Green Carpet Colostygia pectinataria 70.126 1781 Small Waved Umber Horisme vitalbata 70.107 1795 November/Autumnal Moth agg Epirrita dilutata agg. -
Checklist of the Washington Baltimore Area
Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plants of the Washington - Baltimore Area Part I Ferns, Fern Allies, Gymnosperms, and Dicotyledons by Stanwyn G. Shetler and Sylvia Stone Orli Department of Botany National Museum of Natural History 2000 Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560-0166 ii iii PREFACE The better part of a century has elapsed since A. S. Hitchcock and Paul C. Standley published their succinct manual in 1919 for the identification of the vascular flora in the Washington, DC, area. A comparable new manual has long been needed. As with their work, such a manual should be produced through a collaborative effort of the region’s botanists and other experts. The Annotated Checklist is offered as a first step, in the hope that it will spark and facilitate that effort. In preparing this checklist, Shetler has been responsible for the taxonomy and nomenclature and Orli for the database. We have chosen to distribute the first part in preliminary form, so that it can be used, criticized, and revised while it is current and the second part (Monocotyledons) is still in progress. Additions, corrections, and comments are welcome. We hope that our checklist will stimulate a new wave of fieldwork to check on the current status of the local flora relative to what is reported here. When Part II is finished, the two parts will be combined into a single publication. We also maintain a Web site for the Flora of the Washington-Baltimore Area, and the database can be searched there (http://www.nmnh.si.edu/botany/projects/dcflora). -
Butterflies & Moths of the Spanish Pyrenees
Butterflies & Moths of the Spanish Pyrenees Naturetrek Tour Report 6 - 13 July 2016 Goat Moth by Chris Gibson Large Tortoiseshell by David Tipping Spotted Fritillary by David Tipping Spanish Purple Hairstreak by Bob Smith Report compiled by Chris Gibson Images courtesy of David Tipping, Bob Smith & Chris Gibson Naturetrek Mingledown Barn Wolf's Lane Chawton Alton Hampshire GU34 3HJ England T: +44 (0)1962 733051 F: +44 (0)1962 736426 E: [email protected] W: www.naturetrek.co.uk Tour Report Butterflies & Moths of the Spanish Pyrenees Participants: Chris Gibson, Richard Cash and Peter Rich (Leaders) with 10 Naturetrek clients Introduction A late, damp spring ensured that the landscape around Berdún, in the foothills of the Aragónese Pyrenees, was much greener than on some previous trips at this time. A wide range of nectar sources had persisted until mid- summer, and when the sun came out at least, attracted large numbers and a rich diversity of butterflies. We explored from the lowlands to the high mountains, in weather that varied from warm and humid, to very hot and dry, albeit with persistent northerly winds on the last couple of days. In total the week produced 113 species of butterfly, together with many dazzling day-flying moths (particularly burnets) and other wonderful bugs and beasties. And almost nightly moth trapping gave us a window into the night-life, albeit dominated by Pine Processionaries, but with a good sample of the big, beautiful and bizarre. Add in to the mix the stunning scenery, a good range of mountain birds, a few mammals and reptiles, and wonderful food, drink and accommodation at Casa Sarasa: the perfect recipe for an outstanding holiday! Day 1 Wednesday 6th July We arrived at Zaragoza Airport, met Peter, and boarded the minibuses to be taken to Casa Sarasa in Berdún; it was sunny and hot, but there were still a few interesting birds to be seen en route, including White Stork, Booted Eagle, and Red and Black Kites. -
How Trend Prediction Brewed up Matcha for Unilever
How trend prediction brewed up Matcha for Unilever Their Challenge • Like the craft beer and baking categories, tea is having a revolution with customers tapping into different benefits, Black Swan identified flavours and varieties fuelled by social media. But the motivations and behaviours category is changing faster than brands can keep up with. that consumers follow” and • With traditional variants slowing, Unilever’s Lipton brand look towards. In particular wanted to inform new product innovations and stimulate this helped us to prioritise, growth within the Ice Tea category. They turned to Black refine and find outstanding Swan and Social data to achieve this. proposition options in the all-important health and Our Approach wellness space. • We ingested 36m high-quality tea conversations from Clare Hemphill, social media and using NLP and AI we analysed every Global Insights Director, trend being talked about, to identify what’s a short-term Unilever fad and sustainable trend. • The most interesting emerging trends for Innovation were prioritised and ranked with a The Impact Trend Prediction Value (TPV) by • Lipton used our insight to fast-track the their predicted growth potential launch of a ready-to-drink Matcha Green Tea (not just size or growth). variant which became the leading Iced Tea variant on the market within just five months The Results • A year after our recommendations our prediction accuracy was proven: • We identified that the Matcha conversation was evolving from Matcha products had added £11m in an exotic oriental ingredient to incremental category value one with perceived mainstream Social conversations about Matcha had health and wellness benefits. -
Butterfly Sightings 2007 BC Upper Thames Branch ** January to December 2007 Archive **
Butterfly Sightings 2007 BC Upper Thames Branch ** January to December 2007 Archive ** Monday 31st December 2007 John Lerpiniere sent the following report on 23rd December: "I saw a Peacock at Castle Hill, Reading flying across the traffic on 26th November, a Brimstone at Broadmoor Bottom, Crowthorne, over heather on 29th November and a Peacock near Tidmarsh near Pangbourne making many circuits around a pheasant pen on 1st December." For some winter interest, Dennis Dell sent the photograph below on 3rd December: "It's a hibernating Purple Emperor larva in typical position at a junction of Sallow branches. Fantastic camouflage!" Sunday 2nd December 2007 Nick Bowles reports on the Conservation Work Party at Holtspur Bottom in November: "The reserve continues to look very good. A small group planted Violet (for Dark Green Fritillary larvae) around the scrub edge, after some tidying operations to remove dogwood regrowth, and Kidney Vetch (for Small Blue larvae) near the scrape." [To find out more about our Branch Conservation work - click here.] On 29th November Jan Haseler saw a Peacock in the hedge at the Riseley Village Sports Field. Saturday 24th November 2007 John Ward-Smith sent this news from Bracknell on 22nd November: "My wife reported a Peacock in the back garden at mid-day. It even settled on her and she said it was in good condition." David Redhead went to the National Members Day on 17th November: "Whilst chatting to Gillian Oldfield she told me she was surprised to see a Peacock flying in Combe on Friday afternoon - sunny but cold." Dave Wilton has been busy with the search for Brown Hairstreak eggs in the Bucks/Oxon border area over the past couple of weeks and has already managed to add three new kilometre squares to the butterfly's known range around Bicester. -
Reading Naturalist.Qxd
The Reading Naturalist No. 69 Published by the Reading and District Natural History Society Report for 2016 (Published 2017) Price to Non-Members £5.00 T H E R E A D I N G N A T U R A L I S T No 69 for the year 2016 The Journal of the Reading and District Natural History Society President Mrs Jan Haseler Honorary General Secretary Mr Rob Stallard Honorary Editor Mr Ken White, Yonder Cottage, Ashford Hill, Reading, RG19 8AX Honorary Recorders Botany: Dr Ren ée Grayer, 16 Harcourt Drive, Earley, Reading, RG6 5TJ Fungi: Position Vacant Lichens: Position Vacant Lepidoptera: Mr Norman Hall, 44 Harcourt Drive, Earley, Reading, RG6 5TJ Entomology & other Invertebrates: Position Vacant Vertebrates: Mr Tony Rayner, The Red Cow, 46 Wallingford Road, Cholsey, Wallingford, OX10 9LB CONTENTS Presidential Musings Jan Haseler 1 Membership Norman Hall, Ian Duddle 2 Members’ Observations Julia Cooper, Rob Stallard 2 Excursions 2016 Renée Grayer, Jan Haseler 6 Sean O’Leary, Peter Cuss Ailsa Claybourn, Norman Hall Ken White, Sarah White Mid-week Walks 2016 Jan Haseler, Renée Grayer 17 Jerry Welsh, Rob Stallard Indoor Meetings 2016 Renée Grayer, Rob Stallard 21 Winning photographs and photographs from outings Members 33 Christmas Party and Photographic Competition Laurie Haseler 40 Presidential Address Jan Haseler 41 Theale Nightingle & Warbler Survey 2016 Richard Crawford 45 Saving our Swifts Colin Wilson 47 Recorder’s Report for Botany 2016 Renée Grayer 48 Recorder’s Report for Lepidoptera 2016 Norman Hall 52 Recorder’s Report for Vertebrates 2016 Tony Rayner 63 The Weather in Reading during 2016 Roger Brugge 70 Thanks go to all the contributors for their efforts in meeting the deadlines whilst carrying on with busy lives. -
Spring Summer News
THE CHILTERNS NEWSLETTER Wildlife Trust news, views and event information from the Chilterns Group, College Lake and around Buckinghamshire. Issue 99 Spring - Summer 2019 Threats and opportunities PLEASE SUPPORT THE BBOWT Being involved in wildlife conservation is no PLANT AND PRODUCE easy ride these days. Against the background of international horror stories of massive insect CHARITY MARKET losses, unbelievable levels of marine pollution and shocking disregard of climate change evidence, we have depressing threats in our own back yard. HS2 looks set to continue, despite GREAT MISSENDEN mounting doubts about the need for it and enormous overspend predictions. In addition Memorial Centre, Link Road, there are concerns that the East-West Rail project will fail on its ecological promises and Great Missenden HP16 9AE now the prospect of the Oxford-Cambridge Expressway bringing a further swathe of Sunday 19 May 10 - 12 noon destruction across North Bucks, Bernwood and the River Thame floodplain. In its wake the Government wants to see an ‘economic growth arc’ bringing a series of new towns and super- villages between Bicester and Milton Keynes. Thankfully, there are occasional shafts of •Excellent value plants sunlight in this gloom. BBOWT has won its •Tasty homemade produce appeal in the High Court to be able to launch a •Tea, coffee, cakes, Judicial Review of the decision over the route of the Expressway. The Trust could not fight for •Free entry, free parking (1hr) wildlife like this without your support. The Chilterns Group contributed funds towards the legal costs of the court appearance and will continue to do so.