WAR and the Hall of Fame

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

WAR and the Hall of Fame WAR and the Hall of Fame Joshua Bayzick May 5,2015 Abstract Sabermetrics is a term coined by Bill James, and it is the search for objective knowledge about baseball. This mathematical approach to baseball produced a statistic called Wins Above Replacement (WAR), which takes into account batting, baserunning, and fielding to determine how many `wins' that position player was worth. This project looks at how player's WAR values change as they age. We will compare two groups of players, First-ballot Hall of Famers (HOF) and the average player. We know that the HOF group will have higher WAR values because they were well above average players, but the basic question is do they age differently than the average player. 1 Introduction A relatively new statistic called WAR (Wins Above Replacement) was developed by saber- metricians to answer questions such as \Who had the better career?" or \Who had the better year?" For example, in 2014 Alex Gordon had a batting average of .266 with 19 home runs and 74 RBI. In 2014 Yoenis Cespedes had a batting average of .260 with 22 home runs and 100 RBI. Based on these conventional statistics, they appear to have had fairly similar years. One might even argue that Cespedes was slightly better because of the RBI advantage. However, these conventional statistics do not measure everything a player does to help his team win a game. WAR, which takes into account batting, baserunning, and fielding, says that in 2014 Alex Gordon was worth 6.6 WAR for his team, while Ces- pedes was worth 3.3 WAR. Based on this WAR statistic, we easily conclude Alex Gordon had the better year overall. This paper will show you how parts of the WAR calculation are done and other uses of the statistic. 2 WAR Calculation The Sabermetrics website FanGraphs describes the statistic as follows: \WAR offers an estimate to answer the question, `If this player got injured, and their(sic) team had to replace them with a freely available minor leaguer or a AAAA player from their bench, how much value would the team be losing?'" The statistic summarizes a player's contribution to his team's win total in one statistic. One characteristic of WAR is that it is independent of ballpark, league and season. It is also important to note that WAR is an approximation. For example, a 6 WAR player may be worth between 5 and 7 WAR, but we can certainly say this player performed at a 1 high level. A WAR value of 7 is considered to be an MVP season, according to FanGraphs. Therefore, WAR values tend to be situated between 0 and 7. The table below details WAR values even further. Lastly, WAR values are calculated differently for position players than they are for pitchers. This paper will focus only on position players. WAR Level of Play 0{1 Scrub 1{2 Role Player 2{3 Solid Starter 3{4 Good Player 4{5 All Star 5{6 Superstar 6{7 MVP To determine how many wins a player is worth to his team, we must first find out how many runs that player is worth to his team. For position players, these runs come from three phases of the game: batting, baserunning, and fielding. We add these runs together and then adjust the values based on his position, league, and the value of a replacement player. This produces the total amount of runs this player is worth. Lastly, we divide the total runs by the runs per win to produce wins. 2.1 Batting Runs To determine how many runs a batter creates by batting, we must first calculate Weighted On Base Average (wOBA). Using wOBA, we can calculate weighted Runs Above Average (wRAA), and then finally we can calculate batting runs. The statistic wOBA is calculated by taking league data and using multiple regression to generate the optimum weight for each hitting event. In other words, wOBA is designed to generate the optimum relationship between the hitting events and the amount of runs scored. The formula for wOBA is : w · uBB + w · HBP + w · 1B + w · 2B + w · 3B + w · HR wOBA = 1 2 3 4 5 6 AB + BB − IBB + SF + HBP where w1; w2; : : : ; w6 are the weights of each hitting event, uBB represents unintentional walks, HBP represents the number of times a batter was hit by a pitch, and 1B, 2B, 3B, and HR represent singles, doubles, triples and home runs respectively. These weights will change every year, but in 2013 we have 0:690 · uBB + 0:722 · HBP + 0:888 · 1B + 1:271 · 2B + 1:616 · 3B + 2:101 · HR wOBA = AB + BB − IBB + SF + HBP After using a player's statistics to calculate his wOBA, we can calculate wRAA. The formula for wRAA is wOBA − lg wOBA wRAA = · PA wOBA scale This formula finds the difference between a player's wOBA and the league's, and then scales this value so that plate appearances are an appropriate multiple. 2 Finally, we can calculate batting runs by using the formula leagueR PF · leagueR leagueR AL/NL nonpitcher wRC BR = wRAA+ − PA+ − PA leaguePA leaguePA leaguePA AL/NL PA Essentially this formula takes batting runs and then adjusts that value for the park effect of a player's home field, and also for the league. The park adjustment is necessary because baseball fields have different dimensions and characteristics. Some parks suppress runs and others encourage runs. This adjustment makes sure that no player has an advantage based on the park they played in. The last term simply balances the effect of the league. For example, the American League (AL) usually produces more runs since there is a Designated Hitter to bat for the pitcher. Thus, more runs are scored in the AL and it takes more runs to account for a win. 2.2 Baserunning Runs How many runs a player adds based on his baserunning is determined by two statistics: Ultimate Baserunning and Weighted Stolen Base Runs. These statistics are mostly pro- prietary, but they measure how effective a baserunner is. They account for the amount of steals, the success rate of steals, and even how often a player advances extra bases on a hit. They utilize video review to find values for these statistics. 2.3 Fielding Runs Fielding Runs are also largely based on proprietary data. There are a few metrics available, such as Ultimate Zone Rating, Total Zone, and Defensive Runs Saved. There are different kinds of WAR based on the fielding metric used. These WAR values are similar, but the kinds of WAR must be distinguished from one another if the formula is different. We are using FanGraph's version of WAR (referred to as fWAR). Video is employed here as well to better estimate the range of a fielder. 2.4 Adjustments After summing the Batting Runs, Baserunning Runs, and Fielding Runs, we must adjust this value. There are three adjustments. The first is a positional adjustment. These are adjustments based on the position the player played. Certain positions are more difficult to play than others, and the positional adjustment tries to account for this. The second adjustment is a league adjustment. This just makes certain that the runs above average balances out to zero. This is often a minor adjustment. The last adjustment is the replace- ment player adjustment. So far, all of our calculations have been based around the average player. A replacement player is below the league average, so we must add some runs to the player to compare them to a replacement player. These adjustments are typically very small. 2.5 Final Calculation To calculate WAR we take the sum of the six components: batting runs, baserunning runs, fielding runs, and the three adjustments. This total is the amount of runs a player 3 contributes. To find the amount of wins the player was worth, we must divide the total number of runs by a Runs per Win value. This value changes year to year, but typically is somewhere around 10. Thus, the full calculation for WAR is Batting + Baserunning + Fielding + Positional Adj. + League Adj. + Replacement WAR = Runs per Win 3 Uses of WAR Now that we know how WAR is calculated, we must understand what it offers to the baseball community. The main goal of the statistic is to generate one number to account for player performance. It is very easy for anyone to understand the phrase: \He was a 6 win player." As the Sabermetrics approach takes hold, WAR is being used increasingly in the administering of individual awards, such as the MVP and Cy Young awards. Another application is even its use in calculating the dollar value of a player for contract negotiations. 4 The Basic Question This brings us to our research question: \Do Inner Circle Hall of Fame Players age differently than the average player?" It is important to note that the Hall of Fame player will have higher WAR values, but we are concerned with the change in the values as the player ages. Further, we will define Inner Circle Hall of Famers, as players elected to the Hall of Fame their first year on the ballot. They must have been retired for seven years to be considered, and to be elected they must appear on 75% of the ballots of the sportswriters who vote. There are 32 First Ballot Hall of Fame position players, including Babe Ruth, Ted Williams, Mickey Mantle, and Willie Mays (See Appendix A). 4.1 Definition of Data Sets Due to the nature of WAR and the development of the game we will only use players from the live-ball era, which began in 1920.
Recommended publications
  • 2021 Topps Tier One Checklist .Xls
    AUTOGRAPH TIER ONE AUTOGRAPHS T1A-ABE Adrian Beltre Texas Rangers® T1A-BH Bryce Harper Philadelphia Phillies® T1A-CJ Chipper Jones Atlanta Braves™ T1A-CY Christian Yelich Milwaukee Brewers™ T1A-DJ Derek Jeter New York Yankees® T1A-DS Darryl Strawberry New York Mets® T1A-EJ Eloy Jimenez Chicago White Sox® T1A-EM Edgar Martinez Seattle Mariners™ T1A-FTA Frank Thomas Chicago White Sox® T1A-GM Greg Maddux Chicago Cubs® T1A-I Ichiro Seattle Mariners™ T1A-IR Ivan Rodriguez Florida Marlins™ T1A-JB Johnny Bench Cincinnati Reds® T1A-JMA J.D. Martinez Boston Red Sox® T1A-JS Juan Soto Washington Nationals® T1A-LW Larry Walker Colorado Rockies™ T1A-MC Miguel Cabrera Detroit Tigers® T1A-MR Mariano Rivera New York Yankees® T1A-MS Mike Schmidt Philadelphia Phillies® T1A-MT Mike Trout Angels® T1A-PG Paul Goldschmidt St. Louis Cardinals® T1A-PMO Paul Molitor Minnesota Twins® T1A-RJ Randy Johnson Arizona Diamondbacks® T1A-RJA Reggie Jackson Oakland Athletics™ T1A-SB Shane Bieber Cleveland Indians® T1A-TG Tom Glavine Atlanta Braves™ T1A-WC Will Clark San Francisco Giants® BREAK OUT AUTOGRAPHS BOA-AB Alec Bohm Philadelphia Phillies® Rookie BOA-ABO Alec Bohm Philadelphia Phillies® Rookie BOA-AG Andres Gimenez New York Mets® Rookie BOA-AGI Andres Gimenez New York Mets® Rookie BOA-AK Alex Kirilloff Minnesota Twins® Rookie BOA-AKI Alex Kirilloff Minnesota Twins® Rookie BOA-AN Austin Nola San Diego Padres™ BOA-ANO Austin Nola San Diego Padres™ BOA-AT Anderson Tejeda Texas Rangers® Rookie BOA-ATE Anderson Tejeda Texas Rangers® Rookie BOA-AV Alex Verdugo Boston
    [Show full text]
  • July 10-14, 2015 SQ
    OVER 400,000 July 10-14, 2015 SQ. FEET OF FUN Duke Energy Convention Center • Cincinnati, OH LEGENDS PROGRAMTM The Legends Program gives fans the opportunity to meet some Major League Baseball® is looking for volunteers to assist of the past and present Major League Baseball® legends. With with the events surrounding the 2015 MLB® All-Star Week™. four great ways to meet players, the Legends Program provides Volunteer opportunities during MLB® All-Star Week™ include a once in a life time experience for all fans. Fans can get free T-Mobile All-Star FanFest,® MLB® community events and autographs, participate in clinics coached by the legends, take MLB® All-Star hospitality events. The events will take place a photo at the World’s Largest Baseball, or sit in and listen to July 10th through July 14th. Volunteers must be 18 years or the great baseball stories in our Question and Answer sessions. older and can register now on ALLSTARGAME.COM to be All opportunities are included in the price of admission. part of all the fun and excitement. Don’t miss out on this unique and fun opportunity. Question and Answer Sessions Photo Opportunities Ozzie Smith (HOF) Paul Molitor (HOF) Diamond Clinics Autograph Sessions Dave Winfield (HOF) Alex Gordon Past legends who have made appearances include: • Lou Brock (HOF) • Bryce Harper • Rollie Fingers (HOF) • Clayton Kershaw • Barry Larkin (HOF) • Andrew McCutchen • Miguel Cabrera • Giancarlo Stanton Mr. Red Legs Visit for an updated schedule FOR MORE INFORMATION VISIT FOR MORE INFORMATION VISIT of appearances and autograph sessions *All appearances are subject to change* Duke Energy Convention Center July 10-14, 2015 LIVE OUT YOUR ® BASEBALL DREAMS This July you can experience Major League Baseball® in ways you’ve only dreamed about.
    [Show full text]
  • Baseball Record Book
    2018 BASEBALL RECORD BOOK BIG12SPORTS.COM @BIG12CONFERENCE #BIG12BSB CHAMPIONSHIP INFORMATION/HISTORY The 2018 Phillips 66 Big 12 Baseball Championship will be held at Chickasaw Bricktown Ballpark, May 23-27. Chickasaw Bricktown Ballpark is home to the Los Angeles Dodgers Triple A team, the Oklahoma City Dodgers. Located in OKC’s vibrant Bricktown District, the ballpark opened in 1998. A thriving urban entertainment district, Bricktown is home to more than 45 restaurants, many bars, clubs, and retail shops, as well as family- friendly attractions, museums and galleries. Bricktown is the gateway to CHAMPIONSHIP SCHEDULE Oklahoma City for tourists, convention attendees, and day trippers from WEDNESDAY, MAY 23 around the region. Game 1: Teams To Be Determined (FCS) 9:00 a.m. Game 2: Teams To Be Determined (FCS) 12:30 p.m. This year marks the 19th time Oklahoma City has hosted the event. Three Game 3: Teams To Be Determined (FCS) 4:00 p.m. additional venues have sponsored the championship: All-Sports Stadium, Game 4: Teams To Be Determined (FCS) 7:30 p.m. Oklahoma City (1997); The Ballpark in Arlington (2002, ‘04) and ONEOK Field in Tulsa (2015). THURSDAY MAY 24 Game 5: Game 1 Loser vs. Game 2 Loser (FCS) 9:00 a.m. Past postseason championship winners include Kansas (2006), Missouri Game 6: Game 3 Loser vs. Game 4 Loser (FCS) 12:30 p.m. (2012), Nebraska (1999-2001, ‘05), Oklahoma (1997, 2013), Oklahoma Game 7: Game 1 Winner vs. Game 2 Winner (FCS) 4:00 p.m. State (2004, ‘17), TCU (2014, ‘16), Texas (2002-03, ‘08-09, ‘15), Texas Game 8: Game 3 Winner vs.
    [Show full text]
  • A Statistical Study Nicholas Lambrianou 13' Dr. Nicko
    Examining if High-Team Payroll Leads to High-Team Performance in Baseball: A Statistical Study Nicholas Lambrianou 13' B.S. In Mathematics with Minors in English and Economics Dr. Nickolas Kintos Thesis Advisor Thesis submitted to: Honors Program of Saint Peter's University April 2013 Lambrianou 2 Table of Contents Chapter 1: The Study and its Questions 3 An Introduction to the project, its questions, and a breakdown of the chapters that follow Chapter 2: The Baseball Statistics 5 An explanation of the baseball statistics used for the study, including what the statistics measure, how they measure what they do, and their strengths and weaknesses Chapter 3: Statistical Methods and Procedures 16 An introduction to the statistical methods applied to each statistic and an explanation of what the possible results would mean Chapter 4: Results and the Tampa Bay Rays 22 The results of the study, what they mean against the possibilities and other results, and a short analysis of a team that stood out in the study Chapter 5: The Continuing Conclusion 39 A continuation of the results, followed by ideas for future study that continue to project or stem from it for future baseball analysis Appendix 41 References 42 Lambrianou 3 Chapter 1: The Study and its Questions Does high payroll necessarily mean higher performance for all baseball statistics? Major League Baseball (MLB) is a league of different teams in different cities all across the United States, and those locations strongly influence the market of the team and thus the payroll. Year after year, a certain amount of teams, including the usual ones in big markets, choose to spend a great amount on payroll in hopes of improving their team and its player value output, but at times the statistics produced by these teams may not match the difference in payroll with other teams.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving the FIP Model
    Project Number: MQP-SDO-204 Improving the FIP Model A Major Qualifying Project Report Submitted to The Faculty of Worcester Polytechnic Institute In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science by Joseph Flanagan April 2014 Approved: Professor Sarah Olson Abstract The goal of this project is to improve the Fielding Independent Pitching (FIP) model for evaluating Major League Baseball starting pitchers. FIP attempts to separate a pitcher's controllable performance from random variation and the performance of his defense. Data from the 2002-2013 seasons will be analyzed and the results will be incorporated into a new metric. The new proposed model will be called jFIP. jFIP adds popups and hit by pitch to the fielding independent stats and also includes adjustments for a pitcher's defense and his efficiency in completing innings. Initial results suggest that the new metric is better than FIP at predicting pitcher ERA. Executive Summary Fielding Independent Pitching (FIP) is a metric created to measure pitcher performance. FIP can trace its roots back to research done by Voros McCracken in pursuit of winning his fantasy baseball league. McCracken discovered that there was little difference in the abilities of pitchers to prevent balls in play from becoming hits. Since individual pitchers can have greatly varying levels of effectiveness, this led him to wonder what pitchers did have control over. He found three that stood apart from the rest: strikeouts, walks, and home runs. Because these events involve only the batter and the pitcher, they are referred to as “fielding independent." FIP takes only strikeouts, walks, home runs, and innings pitched as inputs and it is scaled to earned run average (ERA) to allow for easier and more useful comparisons, as ERA has traditionally been one of the most important statistics for evaluating pitchers.
    [Show full text]
  • HOUSE RESOLUTION No. 6054 WHEREAS, the Kansas City
    HOUSE RESOLUTION No. 6054 ARESOLUTION congratulating and commending the Kansas City Royals baseball organization on their World Championship 2015 season. WHEREAS, The Kansas City Royals are the 2015 World Series Champions, earn- ing the title of World Champions of Major League Baseball; and WHEREAS, The Kansas City Royals are also the 2015 American League Central Division Champions and won the 2015 American League pennant for the second year in a row; and WHEREAS, The Kansas City Royals won an American League leading 95 games, and won 11 more games in the postseason, culminating in a dominant World Series victory over the New York Mets in five games, in the best-of-seven annual champi- onship classic, earning the Royals their first championship since 1985; and WHEREAS, The 2015 World Series matchup between the Royals and the Mets featured the first-ever Fall Classic between two of Major League Baseball’s expansion franchises; and WHEREAS, Game one of the World Series was played on October 27, 2015, which exactly 30 years prior to such day, on October 27, 1985, the Kansas City Royals won game seven and their first World Series Championship; and WHEREAS, With the first pitch in the bottom of the first inning of the first game of the 2015 World Series, Royals shortstop, Alcides Escobar hit the first inside-the- park home run by a lead-off hitter in a World Series game since 1903; and WHEREAS, The opening game also set the tone for this memorable series when Royals All-Star Alex Gordon sent the game into extra innings in the ninth inning, becoming only the fifth player in history to tie a World Series game with a ninth- inning home run.
    [Show full text]
  • Mediaguide.Pdf
    American Legion Baseball would like to thank the following: 2017 ALWS schedule THURSDAY – AUGUST 10 Game 1 – 9:30am – Northeast vs. Great Lakes Game 2 – 1:00pm – Central Plains vs. Western Game 3 – 4:30pm – Mid-South vs. Northwest Game 4 – 8:00pm – Southeast vs. Mid-Atlantic Off day – none FRIDAY – AUGUST 11 Game 5 – 4:00pm – Great Lakes vs. Central Plains Game 6 – 7:30pm – Western vs. Northeastern Off day – Mid-Atlantic, Southeast, Mid-South, Northwest SATURDAY – AUGUST 12 Game 7 – 11:30am – Mid-Atlantic vs. Mid-South Game 8 – 3:30pm – Northwest vs. Southeast The American Legion Game 9 – Northeast vs. Central Plains Off day – Great Lakes, Western Code of Sportsmanship SUNDAY – AUGUST 13 Game 10 – Noon – Great Lakes vs. Western I will keep the rules Game 11 – 3:30pm – Mid-Atlantic vs. Northwest Keep faith with my teammates Game 12 – 7:30pm – Southeast vs. Mid-South Keep my temper Off day – Northeast, Central Plains Keep myself fit Keep a stout heart in defeat MONDAY – AUGUST 14 Game 13 – 3:00pm – STARS winner vs. STRIPES runner-up Keep my pride under in victory Game 14 – 7:00pm – STRIPLES winner vs. STARS runner-up Keep a sound soul, a clean mind And a healthy body. TUESDAY – AUGUST 14 – CHAMPIONSHIP TUESDAY Game 15 – 7:00pm – winner game 13 vs. winner game 14 ALWS matches Stars and Stripes On the cover Top left: Logan Vidrine pitches Texarkana AR into the finals The 2017 American Legion World Series will salute the Stars of the ALWS championship with a three-hit performance and Stripes when playing its 91st World Series (92nd year) against previously unbeaten Rockport IN.
    [Show full text]
  • More on Defensive Regression (Or Runs) Analysis 7
    More on Defensive A Regression (or Runs) Analysis Th is appendix has three primary objectives: fi rst, to disclose aspects of DRA not disclosed in chapter two; second, to address aspects of the model that raise issues related less to baseball per se than to statistical modeling in gen- eral; and third, to drive home the fundamental point that DRA is not an answer, but a method. Included in this appendix are certain alternative models I tried, and suggestions for further improvements, which should provide some sense of the range of alternative approaches that are possible. DRA POST-1951 Overview Th ere are essentially two DRA models: post-1951 and pre-1952. Th e post- 1951 model uses a subset of Retrosheet play-by-play data currently available for seasons aft er 1951, and was almost completely described in chapter two. Th e pre-1952 model must make do with considerably less data, which ren- ders it more primitive for infi elders and unavoidably more complicated for outfi elders. When we fi rst began explaining DRA, we took a ‘bottom-up’ approach, starting from the shortstop position and gradually building up until we had a team model. Here we’ll take a ‘top-down’ approach, revealing the entire post-1951 team model all at once, and then discussing its components. Likewise, we’ll start with a top-down discussion of the pre-1952 model. Th e following page presents the entire post-1951 model on one page, with a glos- sary of defi ned terms on the facing page. 3 AAppendix-A.inddppendix-A.indd 3 22/1/2011/1/2011 22:27:53:27:53 PPMM AAppendix-A.indd 4 p p e n d i x - A .
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Standings
    ANNUAL STANDINGS 2013 Conference Overall School W L T Pct. H A N W L T Pct. H A N Streak vs. Top 25 Kansas State 16 8 0 .667 9-3-0 7-5-0 0-0-0 45 19 0 .703 26-7-0 13-10-0 6-2-0 Lost 2 6-6 Oklahoma State 13 10 0 .565 7-4-0 4-5-0 2-1-0 41 19 0 .683 24-7-0 8-7-0 9-5-0 Lost 1 4-3 Oklahoma 13 11 0 .542 7-2-0 5-7-0 1-2-0 43 21 0 .672 25-6-0 9-12-0 9-3-0 Lost 2 5-7 West Virginia 13 11 0 .542 8-4-0 5-7-0 0-0-0 33 26 0 .559 15-5-0 12-14-0 6-7-0 Won 2 4-4 Baylor 12 11 0 .522 9-3-0 3-8-0 0-0-0 27 28 0 .491 17-10-0 6-14-0 4-4-0 Lost 3 5-6 Kansas 12 12 0 .500 7-5-0 5-7-0 0-0-0 34 25 0 .576 17-6-0 8-14-0 9-5-0 Lost 1 4-4 TCU 12 12 0 .500 7-5-0 5-7-0 0-0-0 29 28 0 .509 16-14-0 11-12-0 2-2-0 Lost 2 3-10 Texas Tech 9 15 0 .375 5-7-0 4-8-0 0-0-0 26 30 0 .464 19-10-0 6-16-0 1-4-0 Won 1 5-8 Texas 7 17 0 .292 4-8-0 3-9-0 0-0-0 27 24 0 .529 22-10-0 5-14-0 0-0 Won 1 2-7 NCAA Participants (3): K-State, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State CWS Participants: None 2012 CONFERENCE OVERALL School W L T Pct.
    [Show full text]
  • Sports Figures Price Guide
    SPORTS FIGURES PRICE GUIDE All values listed are for Mint (white jersey) .......... 16.00- David Ortiz (white jersey). 22.00- Ching-Ming Wang ........ 15 Tracy McGrady (white jrsy) 12.00- Lamar Odom (purple jersey) 16.00 Patrick Ewing .......... $12 (blue jersey) .......... 110.00 figures still in the packaging. The Jim Thome (Phillies jersey) 12.00 (gray jersey). 40.00+ Kevin Youkilis (white jersey) 22 (blue jersey) ........... 22.00- (yellow jersey) ......... 25.00 (Blue Uniform) ......... $25 (blue jersey, snow). 350.00 package must have four perfect (Indians jersey) ........ 25.00 Scott Rolen (white jersey) .. 12.00 (grey jersey) ............ 20 Dirk Nowitzki (blue jersey) 15.00- Shaquille O’Neal (red jersey) 12.00 Spud Webb ............ $12 Stephen Davis (white jersey) 20.00 corners and the blister bubble 2003 SERIES 7 (gray jersey). 18.00 Barry Zito (white jersey) ..... .10 (white jersey) .......... 25.00- (black jersey) .......... 22.00 Larry Bird ............. $15 (70th Anniversary jersey) 75.00 cannot be creased, dented, or Jim Edmonds (Angels jersey) 20.00 2005 SERIES 13 (grey jersey ............... .12 Shaquille O’Neal (yellow jrsy) 15.00 2005 SERIES 9 Julius Erving ........... $15 Jeff Garcia damaged in any way. Troy Glaus (white sleeves) . 10.00 Moises Alou (Giants jersey) 15.00 MCFARLANE MLB 21 (purple jersey) ......... 25.00 Kobe Bryant (yellow jersey) 14.00 Elgin Baylor ............ $15 (white jsy/no stripe shoes) 15.00 (red sleeves) .......... 80.00+ Randy Johnson (Yankees jsy) 17.00 Jorge Posada NY Yankees $15.00 John Stockton (white jersey) 12.00 (purple jersey) ......... 30.00 George Gervin .......... $15 (whte jsy/ed stripe shoes) 22.00 Randy Johnson (white jersey) 10.00 Pedro Martinez (Mets jersey) 12.00 Daisuke Matsuzaka ....
    [Show full text]
  • Determining the Value of a Baseball Player
    the Valu a Samuel Kaufman and Matthew Tennenhouse Samuel Kaufman Matthew Tennenhouse lllinois Mathematics and Science Academy: lllinois Mathematics and Science Academy: Junior (11) Junior (11) 61112012 Samuel Kaufman and Matthew Tennenhouse June 1,2012 Baseball is a game of numbers, and there are many factors that impact how much an individual player contributes to his team's success. Using various statistical databases such as Lahman's Baseball Database (Lahman, 2011) and FanGraphs' publicly available resources, we compiled data and manipulated it to form an overall formula to determine the value of a player for his individual team. To analyze the data, we researched formulas to determine an individual player's hitting, fielding, and pitching production during games. We examined statistics such as hits, walks, and innings played to establish how many runs each player added to their teams' total runs scored, and then used that value to figure how they performed relative to other players. Using these values, we utilized the Pythagorean Expected Wins formula to calculate a coefficient reflecting the number of runs each team in the Major Leagues scored per win. Using our statistic, baseball teams would be able to compare the impact of their players on the team when evaluating talent and determining salary. Our investigation's original focusing question was "How much is an individual player worth to his team?" Over the course of the year, we modified our focusing question to: "What impact does each individual player have on his team's performance over the course of a season?" Though both ask very similar questions, there are significant differences between them.
    [Show full text]
  • Package 'Mlbstats'
    Package ‘mlbstats’ March 16, 2018 Type Package Title Major League Baseball Player Statistics Calculator Version 0.1.0 Author Philip D. Waggoner <[email protected]> Maintainer Philip D. Waggoner <[email protected]> Description Computational functions for player metrics in major league baseball including bat- ting, pitching, fielding, base-running, and overall player statistics. This package is actively main- tained with new metrics being added as they are developed. License MIT + file LICENSE Encoding UTF-8 LazyData true RoxygenNote 6.0.1 NeedsCompilation no Repository CRAN Date/Publication 2018-03-16 09:15:57 UTC R topics documented: ab_hr . .2 aera .............................................3 ba ..............................................4 baa..............................................4 babip . .5 bb9 .............................................6 bb_k.............................................6 BsR .............................................7 dice .............................................7 EqA.............................................8 era..............................................9 erc..............................................9 fip.............................................. 10 fp .............................................. 11 1 2 ab_hr go_ao . 11 gpa.............................................. 12 h9.............................................. 13 iso.............................................. 13 k9.............................................. 14 k_bb............................................
    [Show full text]