DOCSLIB.ORG

New Life for the Ocean

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New Life for the Ocean New Life for the Ocean How Marine Protections Keep Our Waters Wild New Life for the Ocean How Marine Protections Keep Our Waters Wild Written by James Horrox, Frontier Group Steve Blackledge and Kelsey Lamp, Environment America Research & Policy Center February 2021 Acknowledgments The authors thank Jon Day, former Director, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority; Jorge Torre, Director General, Comunidad y Biodiversidad, A.C. (Mexico); Wayne Palsson, former Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife research scientist; Michelle Paddack, Professor of Biology, Marine Sciences & Ecology, Santa Barbara City College; Jennifer Caselle, Marine Science Institute, University of California Santa Barbara; Jerald S. Ault, Ph.D., Professor & Chair, Department of Marine Ecosystems and Society, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami; Jenna Sullivan-Stack, Ph.D., Oregon State University Department of Integrative Biol- ogy; and Andy Winer, Executive Vice President, Strategies 360, for their review of drafts of this document, as well as their insights and suggestions. Thanks also to Aidan Braun for his contribution to this report, and to Tony Dutzik, Susan Rakov, Elizabeth Ridlington and Bryn Huxley-Reicher of Frontier Group for editorial support. This report is funded in part by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. Environment America Research & Policy Center also thanks the Paul M. Angell Family Foundation for making the report possible. The authors bear responsi- bility for any factual errors. The recommendations are those of Environment America Research & Policy Center. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of our funders or those who provided review. 2021 Environment America Research & Policy Center. Some Rights Reserved. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 3.0 U.S. License. To view the terms of this license, visit creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us. Environment America Research & Policy Center is a 501(c)(3) organization. We are dedicated to protecting our air, water and open spaces. We investigate problems, craft solutions, educate the public and decision-makers, and help the public make their voices heard in local, state and national debates over the quality of our environment and our lives. For more information about Environment America Research & Policy Center or for additional copies of this report, please visit www.environmentamericacenter.org. Frontier Group provides information and ideas to build a healthier, more sustainable America. We focus on problems that arise from our nation’s material and technological wealth – the problems of abundance. We deliver timely research and analysis that is accessible to the public, applying insights gleaned from diverse fields of knowledge to arrive at new paths forward. For more information about Frontier Group, please visit www.frontiergroup.org. Layout: To The Point Collaborative, tothepointcollaborative.com Cover photo: A sea turtle off the coast of Hawaii. Credit: Piqsels, Public Domain CC0. Contents Executive summary . 4 Introduction: The ocean under threat . .7 Ocean protections have come a long way, but not far enough . 10 MPAs can offer varying levels of protection . 11 Marine protected areas safeguard wildlife and ecosystems . 13 MPAs promote increased biomass, abundance and density of marine species . 13 MPAs protect and enhance biodiversity . 14 Highly and fully protected MPAs can help mitigate the impacts of climate change . .15 Marine protected areas: Six success stories . 17 California . 17 The Channel Islands MPAs . 18 Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument, HI . 21 Dry Tortugas National Park, FL . 24 Cabo Pulmo, Mexico . 26 The Great Barrier Reef, Australia . .28 Edmonds Underwater Park, WA . 32 Conclusions and recommendations . 34 Notes . 35 Executive summary he ocean drives the processes that make our • MPAs create increased biomass, abundance and planet capable of supporting life, and contains diversity of marine species. A 2009 analysis synthe- some of the world’s most complex and diverse sizing a range of studies of no-take marine reserves T 1 ecosystems. But these ecosystems are increasingly under (fully protected MPAs) showed that full protection threat. Pollution, overfishing, offshore drilling and resulted in significant increases in average biomass other human activities are destroying ocean habitat and (i.e., the total mass of living organisms in a specific threatening marine species, with profound consequences area), size and density of organisms, and the number for the biodiversity on which the health of our ocean of species present.5 In half of the reserves, total depends.2 biomass of studied species was more than triple that of unprotected areas, and the density of those A growing number of scientists and conservationists species more than 60 percent higher.6 are coalescing around the goal of protecting at least 30 percent of the world’s ocean by 2030 through networks • Highly to fully protected MPAs can help mitigate of marine protected areas (MPAs) – protected zones of the impacts of climate change. Protected marine ocean where extractive and destructive human activity is reserves have been found to increase the resilience limited. of marine species to climate-induced impacts, such as shifts in species distribution, decreased ecosystem The experience of six MPAs in the United States productivity and oxygen depletion, and to maintain and around the world shows that marine protected the health of coral reefs and other features that areas are effective tools to conserve and revive marine protect coastlines from extreme weather events.7 A ecosystems. To restore our ocean to health, govern- 2017 study concluded that marine reserves are thus ments should take a strategic, science-based approach “a viable low-tech, cost-effective adaptation strategy to planning and implementing MPAs and regional that would yield multiple cobenefits from local to MPA networks. global scales.”8 • Highly to fully protected MPAs can protect and Marine protected areas have helped restore some of the increase biodiversity, which in turn boosts overall world’s most precious and unique ocean ecosystems – ecosystem health.3 A 2006 meta-analysis showed including several in the United States. that species richness in fully protected MPAs increased by an average of 23 percent after their • California’s MPA network. In America’s first designation, and fish numbers in surrounding areas science-based, statewide MPA network, once- also significantly increased as a result of spillover depleted populations of cabezon, lingcod, black from the protected zones.4 rockfish, black abalone and other species have 4 New Life for the Ocean experienced dramatic increases.9 Within a decade of tions. Research has found the abundance of copper the implementation of a network of fully protected rockfish to be 15 times higher in Edmonds than in zones within the Channel Islands National Marine unprotected areas of the Puget Sound, and lingcod Sanctuary, the density of species targeted by fishing more than twice as abundant and significantly had risen in these zones by 50 percent, and biomass larger than in fished areas of the Sound.15 by 80 percent.10 Marine reserves have also provided important research • Dry Tortugas National Park and Ecological baselines to understand how marine ecosystems and Reserve, FL. Protection of an “ecological cross- individual organisms are being affected by local and roads” in the Gulf of Mexico has played a key role global stressors, as well as important areas of reference in the recovery of reef species including red grouper, for education and research on intact marine ecosystems. mutton snapper, yellowtail snapper and hogfish.11 Policy recommendations • Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument, HI. America’s largest Marine National The health of our ocean is in crisis. Abuse and over- Monument, located in the Pacific Ocean off Hawaii, exploitation of marine environments have led to has helped rescue the endangered green turtle ecosystem destruction and biodiversity decline on an and Laysan duck from the brink of extinction and unprecedented scale. And experts say the worst may be nurtured thriving populations of sharks, giant yet to come. trevally and other species that have experienced Federal and state governments must take urgent action massive population die-offs elsewhere.12 to boost our ocean’s resilience against the myriad • Cabo Pulmo, Mexico. In one of the world’s great- threats it currently faces, and to ensure the mainte- est marine protection success stories, protections nance of ocean ecosystems and conservation of marine enabled a reef to recover from near-total destruction life. Meeting these objectives will require action on by aggressive over-fishing. In the space of just 10 numerous fronts, including sustainable fisheries man- years, overall marine biomass in the protected area agement and global action on climate change. increased by 463 percent, and the biomass of top Marine protected areas, if effectively implemented and predators, including sharks and grouper, increased properly managed, are a critical tool for protecting by more than 1,000 percent.13 and enhancing the health of our ocean. Governments • Great Barrier Reef no-take marine reserves, should take the following actions to expand marine Australia. In the world’s most famous reef, protected areas and maximize their benefits for ocean
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Billing Code 3510-JE DEPARTMENT of COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Availability of Final Evaluation
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 10/09/2020 and available online at federalregister.gov/d/2020-22460, and on govinfo.gov Billing Code 3510-JE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Availability of Final Evaluation Findings of State Coastal Programs and National Estuarine Research Reserves AGENCY: Office for Coastal Management (OCM), National Ocean Service (NOS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Department of Commerce (DOC). ACTION: Notice of availability of evaluation findings. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the availability of final evaluation findings of state coastal programs and national estuarine research reserves. The NOAA Office for Coastal Management has completed review of the Coastal Zone Management Program evaluations for the states and territories of California, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Minnesota, Mississippi, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, and Wisconsin. In addition, the NOAA Office for Coastal Management has completed review of the National Estuarine Research Reserve evaluations for Great Bay, Hudson River, Kachemak Bay, North Inlet-Winyah Bay, Old Woman Creek, and Rookery Bay, and Sapelo Island. Copies of these final evaluation findings may be downloaded at http://coast.noaa.gov/czm/evaluations/evaluation_findings/index.html or by submitting a written request to the person identified under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carrie Hall, Evaluator, Planning and Performance Measurement Program, Office for Coastal Management at [email protected] or (240) 530-0730. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The states and territories were found to be implementing and enforcing their federally approved Coastal Zone Management Programs, addressing the national coastal management objectives identified in CZMA Section 303(2), and adhering to the programmatic terms of their financial assistance awards.
    [Show full text]
  • Eyes Over Puget Sound
    Publication No. 21-03-070 Eyes Over Puget Sound Summary Stay connected COVID Stories Critters & Divers Climate and streams Aerial photos Info Picture by: Jesse Miller 2020 in Review Up-to-date observations of visible water quality conditions in Puget Sound and the Strait of Juan de Fuca Summary conditions at a glance Summary Stay connected COVID Stories Critters & Divers Climate and streams Aerial photos Info The COVID pandemic of 2020 resulted in an information UNIT COVID gap in our work between March and September. Our field Stories crew slowly has restored full capacity and data collection, and EOPS photography resumed in September. Critters Critters in the sediment and water are a testament that and life continues in beautiful ways, and it’s worth going for Divers a dive in Puget Sound when the water is clear. Climate Despite wildfires and a lot of smoke during a dry late and summer, precipitation and flows of major rivers were as Streams expected, or even above normal, for most of the year. MARINE MONITORING MONITORING MARINE With volunteers sending in images on the water we can say that 2020 was a productive year for Puget Sound. TERM Aerial - photos Schools of herring were abundant, Noctiluca blooms were big and numerous, and large amounts of decaying organic material washed onto beaches. LONG Picture by: Jessica Alexanderson Editor: Dr. Christopher Krembs, editorial assistance: Valerie Partridge. PSEMP Marine Waters Workgroup Report of 2018 Summary Stay connected COVID Stories Critters & Divers Climate and streams Aerial photos Info Follow-up on the conditions that led up to 2019, in Puget Sound’s comprehensive marine waters report.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Species of Oahu, Hawaii 2016
    Fish identification photo guide, Oahu, Hawaii 2016 (work in progress 2016-08-22) Stina Tano About this guide Disclaimer First of all, this document is by no means perfect- I have spent a lot of time trying to correctly identify the fish species herein, but shit happens. Use your own best judgement, and do not hold me responsible for misidentifications. All photos are by S Tano if not stated otherwise. Please note that all pictures have been edited, and that some of them, despite this, still suck- it happens, get over it. Families found herein: Acanthuridae (p.1-7) Balistidae (p.8-9) Blennidae (p.10) Carangidae (p.11) Chaetodontidae (p.12-14) Cirrhitidae (p.15) Fistulariidae (p.16) Gobiidae (p.17) Kuhliidae (p.18) Kyphosidae (p.19-20) Labridae (p.21-26) Lutjanidae (p.27) Monacanthidae (p.28) Mugilidae (p.29) Mullidae (p.30-31) Muraenidae (p.32-33) Myliobatidae (p.34) Ostraciidae (p.35) Pomacentridae (p.36-38) Scaridae (p.39-42) Serranidae (p.43) Syngnathidae (p.44) Tetraodontidae (p.45-46) Zanclidae (p.47) Acanthuridae 1 Acanthurus achilles Achilles tang Acanthurus blochii Ringtail surgeonfish Separates from A. xanthopterus by having a long (horizontally long) dark spine, white band on tail and yellow spot behind eye. Juvenile Acanthurus dussumieri Eyestripe surgeonfish Acanthuridae 2 Acanthurus guttatus Whitespotted surgeonfish Acanthurus leucopareius Whitebar surgeonfish Acanthurus nigrofuscus Brown surgeonfish/ Lavender tang Acanthuridae 3 Acanthurus nigroris Bluelined surgeonfish Acanthurus olivaceus Orangespot surgeonfish Acanthuridae 4 Acanthurus triostegus Convict surgeonfish Acanthurus xanthopterus Yellowfin surgeonfish Small (short in length horizontally) dark spine, yellow pectoral fins and yellow mask over eyes.
    [Show full text]
  • Podding of Paralomis Granulosa
    Nauplius ORIGINAL ARTICLE Podding of Paralomis granulosa (Lithodidae) juveniles inhabiting kelp forests of the Cape Horn e-ISSN 2358-2936 www.scielo.br/nau Archipelago (Chile) www.crustacea.org.br Ivan Cañete1 orcid.org/0000-0002-1293-886X Alan M. Friedlander2,3 orcid.org/0000-0003-4858-006X Enric Sala2 orcid.org/0000-0003-4730-3570 Tania Figueroa1 orcid.org/0000-0003-4928-4924 1 Department of Sciences and Natural Resources, Faculty of Sciences, University of Magallanes. Punta Arenas, Chile. IC E-mail: [email protected] TF E-mail: [email protected] 2 Pristine Seas, National Geographic Society. Washington DC, United States of America ES E-mail: [email protected] 3 Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology, University of Hawaii. Kaneohe, Hawaii. United States of America. AMF E-mail: [email protected] ZOOBANK: http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A40E315A-4C8E-4FB7- A6CB-8AF9973CFBDF ABSTRACT Subtidal observations along the Cape Horn Archipelago, Chile (CHA) in February 2017 revealed an unusually large aggregation (or pod) of juvenile false king crabs, Paralomis granulosa (Hombron and Jacquinot, 1846), in association with kelp forests (Macrocystis pyrifera and Lessonia spp.). This is the first study to report a dense aggregation of juveniles of this crab, which was observed at Wollaston Island (WI) (~ 10 m). Paralomis granulosa was present on half the transects at WI (N=10), with a density of 3.1 ± 9.9 ind. m-2. Photographs from the podding event showed densities of P. granulosa ranging from 63 to 367 ind. plant-1 (190 ± 133 ind. plant-1).
    [Show full text]
  • Blancpain Ocean Commitment Partnerships
    Blancpain Ocean Commitment September 2020 The partnerships Blancpain Ocean Commitment Partnerships Exploration and preservation of the world’s oceans is core to Blancpain. With its almost 70-year legacy of the Fifty Fathoms diving watch, the Brand has woven close ties with the explorers, photographers, scientists, and environmentalists who treasure this precious resource. With that affinity has come a determination to support important activities and initiatives dedicated to the oceans. For the past several years, the Blancpain Ocean Commitment (BOC) has demonstrated consistent support for oceanographic initiatives and partnerships with leading organizations, such as the Pristine Seas expeditions, Laurent Ballesta’s Gombessa project, the World Ocean Initiative organized by The Economist, and the World Oceans Day, celebrated every year at the United Nations headquarters in New York. Blancpain was a frontrunner in backing the Pristine Seas initiative as founding partner from 2011 to 2016. Headed by National Geographic Society's Explorer-in-Residence, Dr. Enric Sala, the Pristine Seas expeditions were dedicated to exploring and protecting the precious few remaining, truly unspoiled, wild ocean areas. The expeditions studied and filmed these areas as part of the effort to educate the public and governments on the value and uniqueness of their ecosystems, and to secure governmental pledges as well as support from local communities to protect them. The program helped in particular to protect marine areas in the United States, Chile, Gabon, Kiribati, Costa Rica, French Polynesia, the Seychelles, northern Greenland, and South America's Patagonia region. Laurent Ballesta's Gombessa project focuses on studying some of the rarest, most elusive marine creatures and phenomena.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Extreme Environment Mission Operations Project (NEEMO) 15
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA Extreme Environment Mission Operations Project (NEEMO) 15 facts XV NASA possible t-shirt colors Space exploration presents many unique aquanauts, live in the world’s only undersea challenges to humans. In order to prepare laboratory, the Aquarius, located 3.5 miles astronauts for these extreme environments off the coast of Key Largo, Fla. in space, NASA engineers and scientists use comparable environments on Earth. Most underwater activities are One of the most extreme environments is accomplished by traditional scuba diving, the ocean. Not only is the ocean a harsh but divers are limited to specific amounts of and unpredictable environment, but it has time because of the risk of decompression many parallels to the challenges of living sickness (often called the “bends”). Based and working in space – particularly in on the depth and the amount of time spent destinations with little or no gravity, such as underwater, inert gases such as nitrogen asteroids. will build up in the human body. If a diver ascends out of the water too quickly, the The NASA Extreme Environment Mission gases that were absorbed can create Operations project, known as NEEMO, bubbles within the diver’s body as the sends groups of astronauts, engineers, surrounding pressure reduces. doctors and professional divers to live in an underwater habitat for up to three weeks A technique known as saturation diving at a time. These crew members, called allows people to live and work underwater for days or weeks at a time. After twenty four hours Station, which has served as the living quarters for at any underwater depth, the human body becomes Expedition crew members.
    [Show full text]
  • Underwater Photography Made Easy
    Underwater Photography Made Easy Create amazing photos & video with by Annie Crawley IncludingIncluding highhigh definitiondefinition videovideo andand photophoto galleriesgalleries toto showshow youyou positioningpositioning andand bestbest techniques!techniques! BY ANNIE CRAWLEY SeaLife Cameras Perfect for every environment whether you are headed on a tropical vacation or diving the Puget Sound. These cameras meet all of your imaging needs! ©2013 Annie Crawley www.Sealife-cameras.com www.DiveIntoYourImagination.com Edmonds Underwater Park, Washington All rights reserved. This interactive book, or parts thereof, may not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher, Dive Into Your Imagination, LLC a company founded by Annie Crawley committed to change the way a new generation views the Ocean and themselves. Dive Into Your Imagination, Reg. Pat. & Tm. Off. Underwater Photography Made Easy shows you how to take great photos and video with your SeaLife camera system. After our introduction to this interactive book you will learn: 1. Easy to apply tips and tricks to help you create great images. 2. Five quick review steps to make sure your SeaLife camera system is ready before every dive. 3. Neutral buoyancy tips to help you take great underwater photos & video with your SeaLife camera system. 4. Macro and wide angle photography and video basics including color, composition, understanding the rule of thirds, leading diagonals, foreground and background considerations, plus lighting with strobes and video lights. 5. Techniques for both temperate and tropical waters, how to photograph divers, fish behavior and interaction shots, the difference in capturing animal portraits versus recording action in video. You will learn how to capture sharks, turtles, dolphins, clownfish, plus so much more.
    [Show full text]
  • STAFF WORKING PAPER SUMMARY of SELECTED PEARL HARBOR MARINE NATURAL RESOURCES DATA from 1999 – 2015 - in SUPPORT of PROPOSED PROJECT P 516 Prepared by Stephen H
    1 STAFF WORKING PAPER SUMMARY OF SELECTED PEARL HARBOR MARINE NATURAL RESOURCES DATA FROM 1999 – 2015 - IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSED PROJECT P 516 Prepared by Stephen H. Smith Marine Ecologist SSC Scientific Diving Services March 18, 2015 Introduction Overview. The objective of this Staff Working Paper is to summarize selected data gathered by the author between 1999 and February 2015. During that time period, the author conducted a variety of assessments throughout Pearl Harbor and the Pearl Harbor Entrance Channel. The specific resources which will be addressed in this partial summary are: 1) corals, 2) selected fin fish species and Essential Fish Habitat (EFH), 3) sea turtles, 4) miscellaneous and 5) perceived data gaps. This summary is not intended to reiterate material already presented in the Pearl Harbor INRMP or the many other documents which contain pertinent marine natural resource data; it is intended to summarize unpublished and/or unreported data gathered by the author. In this document, Pearl Harbor is defined as the area north of Hammer Point, as designated on Nautical Chart No. 19366 (Oahu South Coast Pearl Harbor). The Pearl Harbor Entrance Channel (PHEC) is defined as the area south of Hammer Point between the channel markers on the eastern and western sides of the PHEC and extending to the outermost Channel Marker Buoys (No. 1 on the west side and No. 2 on the east side). Figure 1 illustrates the boundaries of the P 516 project assessment area. All the data summarized in this document was gathered by the author, with periodic biological support from Donald Marx, and others.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Workshop Summary Report Salish Sea Fish Assemblage Workshop September 18th 2018 Seattle, Washington Prepared by Zoe van Duivenbode Introduction Changes in the composition and abundance of fish assemblages within the Salish Sea region have long been a topic of interest for management, as they can result in a variety of possible consequences associated with species/population management, habitat conservation, and ecological shifts. The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), and SeaDoc Society organized a workshop to gather managers, researchers, and policy-makers involved in Salish Sea fish assemblages to share and discuss evidence of fish community change, impacts of change on species and ecosystem recovery, and to align management priorities and identify research needs. Further, the idea for a workshop originally was identified within the Endangered Species Act Recovery Plan for yelloweye rockfish and bocaccio of the Puget Sound/Georgia Basin (NMFS 2017)1. It became clear that assessing rockfish assemblage change without the context of assessing available information on full fish assemblage change would be insufficient for addressing recovery needs. The goal of the workshop was to identify relevant time-series data, evaluate current research, and discuss how existing efforts may contribute to future management strategies. In addition to the host agencies, workshop participants represented a collection of agencies and organizations including the Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Puget Sound Restoration Fund, Seattle Aquarium, Samish Tribe’s Department of Natural Resources, Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe, Washington Department of Ecology, WDFW, University of Washington and more (see appendix for full list of participants and organizations).
    [Show full text]
  • Why an Underwater Habitat? Underwater Habitats Are Useful Because They Provide a Permanent Working Area for Aquanauts (Divers) W
    [Type a quote from the document or the summary of an interesting point. You can position the text box anywhere in the document. Use the Drawing Tools tab to change the formatting of the pull quote text box.] Abstract What are the different types of Underwater Habitat and how do they differ? What is the Technology used in Underwater Habitats? Underwater habitats are useful study environments for researchers including marine biologists, There are three main types of underwater habitat that are distinguished from one psychologists studying the effects of prolonged periods of isolation in extreme environments, another by how they deal with water and air pressure. The first type, open To access an underwater lab, divers sometimes swim or take submersibles and physiologists studying how life adapts to different pressures. The technologies used and pressure, has an air pressure inside that is equal to the water pressure outside. which then dock with the facility. Shallow habitats may even be accessed by data gleaned from these studies have applications in space research, and in the future Decompression is required for divers returning to the surface from this type of climbing a ladder or taking an elevator. Deep-sea labs have been taken by crane underwater habitats can be used for industrial activity such as mining the deep sea, and facility, but they are able to go in and out of the laboratory on diving missions with from a boat and placed in the sea. In those labs deep underwater, it becomes expansion of these technologies extends humanity’s reach across earth’s biosphere into its relative ease, due to the fact that they don’t need to acclimate to differing dangerous to breathe in the same air as on the surface because the nitrogen oceans.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Last of the Earth's Frontiers': Sealab, the Aquanaut, and the US
    ‘The Last of the earth’s frontiers’: Sealab, the Aquanaut, and the US Navy’s battle against the sub-marine Rachael Squire Department of Geography Royal Holloway, University of London Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of PhD, University of London, 2017 Declaration of Authorship I, Rachael Squire, hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Signed: ___Rachael Squire_______ Date: __________9.5.17________ 2 Contents Declaration…………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2 Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 5 Acknowledgements …………………………………………………………………………………………… 6 List of figures……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 8 List of abbreviations…………………………………………………………………………………………… 12 Preface: Charting a course: From the Bay of Gibraltar to La Jolla Submarine Canyon……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 13 The Sealab Prayer………………………………………………………………………………………………. 18 Chapter 1: Introducing Sealab …………………………………………………………………………… 19 1.0 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………….... 20 1.1 Empirical and conceptual opportunities ……………………....................... 24 1.2 Thesis overview………………………………………………………………………………. 30 1.3 People and projects: a glossary of the key actors in Sealab……………… 33 Chapter 2: Geography in and on the sea: towards an elemental geopolitics of the sub-marine …………………………………………………………………………………………………. 39 2.0 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………. 40 2.1 The sea in geography……………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Full Document (Pdf 2154
    White Paper Research Project T1803, Task 35 Overwater Whitepaper OVERWATER STRUCTURES: MARINE ISSUES by Barbara Nightingale Charles A. Simenstad Research Assistant Senior Fisheries Biologist School of Marine Affairs School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences University of Washington Seattle, Washington 98195 Washington State Transportation Center (TRAC) University of Washington, Box 354802 University District Building 1107 NE 45th Street, Suite 535 Seattle, Washington 98105-4631 Washington State Department of Transportation Technical Monitor Patricia Lynch Regulatory and Compliance Program Manager, Environmental Affairs Prepared for Washington State Transportation Commission Department of Transportation and in cooperation with U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration May 2001 WHITE PAPER Overwater Structures: Marine Issues Submitted to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Washington Department of Ecology Washington Department of Transportation Prepared by Barbara Nightingale and Charles Simenstad University of Washington Wetland Ecosystem Team School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences May 9, 2001 Note: Some pages in this document have been purposefully skipped or blank pages inserted so that this document will copy correctly when duplexed. TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. REPORT NO. 2. GOVERNMENT ACCESSION NO. 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NO. WA-RD 508.1 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. REPORT DATE Overwater Structures: Marine Issues May 2001 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE 7. AUTHOR(S) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO. Barbara Nightingale, Charles Simenstad 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NO. Washington State Transportation Center (TRAC) University of Washington, Box 354802 11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NO. University District Building; 1107 NE 45th Street, Suite 535 Agreement T1803, Task 35 Seattle, Washington 98105-4631 12.
    [Show full text]