Mast Product Catalogue
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
S.V.R.A SVRA Pocono Vintage Festival S.V.R.A
S.V.R.A SVRA Pocono Vintage Festival S.V.R.A. Hawk Performance Endurance Series with the Shelby American Convention SVRA Sprint Race Series and Historic Oval Racing Exhibition Cars Southeast Road Circuit: 1.37miles Pocono Raceway Long Pond, Pa. Tri-Oval: 2.5 miles Provisional Schedule-Update August 20--23, 2015 August 6, 2015 Wednesday, August 19th Saturday, continued 3:00pm—6:00pm Registration 4:00pm Facility Access (approximate time) 1:00pm Group 1,3,4,8 Race 1 30m win 1:30pm Group 9 Race 1 Thursday, August 20th (8-6pm) 2:00pm Entry deadline for SVRA All-Group Enduro 7:00am—5:00pm Registration 2:00pm-3:10pm SVRA Track Courtesy Period 7:30am—6:00pm Tech Inspection ARCA Garages 1&2. After IndyCar Qualifying 3pm, priority to first 4 run Groups of Friday schedule. (Log Books by Appt.) 8:00am-11:45am/ 4:45pm-6:00pm SAAC Track Day Sessions 3:15—4:30pm SVRA All-Group Enduro 75 minutes 9:30am Drivers' Meeting---Test Day Drivers-ARCA Pavilion All SVRA Races Groups 1 pit stop 10:00am SVRA DOP/TOP Classroom--ARCA Pavilion 6:15-6:30pm SVRA Car Show "Final Laps"--Tri Oval 11:45--12:45 LUNCH DOP/TOP Track Van Around Sessions 12:00-12:30pm SAAC Track Touring on Tri-Oval Paced by SVRA 6:30pm SVRA Event Party 12:00pm-4:45pm SVRA TEST DAY/DOP-TOP SESSIONS Friday, August 21st ( 8-6pm) Sunday, August 23rd (8-12:30pm) 7:00am--5:00pm Registration 7:30am-11:30am / 1:30pm-5:30pm Tech Insp. -
General Regulations for Series Run on Circuits / Automobile Sport (As on 29.05.2020)
General Regulations for Series run on Circuits / Automobile Sport (as on 29.05.2020) Name of the Series: Tourenwagen Classics 2020 DMSB Visa Number: 631/20 Status of the Series/Events: National A Plus incl. NSAFP This series is to make the heroic appearances of the 'golden era' of touring car racing of the 70s, 80s and 90s with all their personalities and vehicles back in the race. A sporty field for private drivers and ex-professionals who want to use their technically complex racing cars in the demanding but cost-conscious setting. Only vehicles that are in their appearance from that era and are seen in those series such as DTM, DRM, STW, BTCC, ETCC or other similar series are addressed. At designated events and by invitation only, the vehicle field will be supplemented by the heroes of the German Racing Championship (formerly DRM) and other iconic cars known , in order to be able to offer organizers, fans and drivers a thrilling spectrum of motorsport history Promoter / Organisation: Tourenwagen Classics GmbH Contacts: Ralph Bahr Mobil-No.: +49 173 1644114 Michael Thier Mobil-No.: +49 171 5104881 Homepage: www.tourenwagen-classics.com E-Mail: [email protected] Table of Contents Part 1 Sporting Regulations 1. Introduction 2. Organisation 2.1 Details on titles and awards of the Series 2.2 Name of the parent ASN 2.3 ASN Visa/Registration Number 2.4 Name of the Organiser/Promoter, address and contacts (Permanent office) 2.5 Composition of the organising committee 2.6 List of Officials (Permanent Stewards) 3. Regulations and Legal Basis of the Series 3.1 Official language 3.2 Responsibility, modification of the regulations, cancellation of the event 4. -
Pocono Provis. 6Grp 71115
S.V.R.A SVRA Pocono Vintage Festival S.V.R.A. Hawk Performance Endurance Series with the Shelby American Convention SVRA Sprint Race Series and Historic Oval Racing Exhibition Cars Southeast Road Circuit: 1.37miles Pocono Raceway Long Pond, Pa. Tri-Oval: 2.5 miles Provisional Schedule August 20--23, 2015 July 11, 2015 Wednesday, August 19th Saturday, continued 3:00pm—6:00pm Registration 4:00pm Facility Access (approximate time) 12:00pm—1:10pm LUNCH BREAK SVRA & SAAC Track Touring Thursday, August 20th (8-6pm) 7:00am—5:00pm Registration 1:10pm Group 7, 9 Race 1 30m win 7:30am—6:00pm Tech Inspection ARCA Garages 1&2. After 1:40pm Group 6 Race 1 3pm, priority to first 4 run Groups of Friday schedule. 2:00pm Entry deadline for Historic/GT/GTP Enduro (Sat PM) (Log Books by Appt.) 2:10pm Group 10, 11 Race 1 8:00am-11:45am/ 4:45pm-6:00pm SAAC Track Day Sessions 2:40pm Group 2 Race 1 9:30am Drivers' Meeting---Test Day Drivers-ARCA Pavilion 3:10pm Group 5, 8 Race 1 10:00am SVRA DOP/TOP Classroom--ARCA Pavilion 3:40pm Group 1,3,4 Race 1 11:45--12:45 LUNCH DOP/TOP Track Van Around Sessions 4:25—5:55pm Historic GT/GTPALMS Enduro 90 minutes End #2 (Groups 5b,6b,7,9,10,11) 2 pit stops 12:00pm-4:45pm SVRA TEST DAY/DOP-TOP SESSIONS Friday, August 21st ( 8-6pm) 6:15-6:30 SVRA Car Show "Final Laps" 7:00am--5:00pm Registration 6:30pm SVRA Event Party & Concert 7:30am-11:30am / 1:30pm-5:30pm Tech Insp. -
Metastability Relationship Between Two- and Three-Dimensional Crystal
www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Metastability relationship between two‑ and three‑dimensional crystal structures: a case study of the Cu‑based compounds Shota Ono Some of the three‑dimensional (3D) crystal structures are constructed by stacking two‑dimensional (2D) layers. To study whether this geometric concept, i.e., using 2D layers as building blocks for 3D structures, can be applied to computational materials design, we theoretically investigate the dynamical stability of copper‑based compounds CuX (a metallic element X) in the B h and L11 structures constructed from the buckled honeycomb (BHC) structure and in the B2 and L10 structures constructed from the buckled square (BSQ) structure. We demonstrate that (i) if CuX in the BHC structure is dynamically stable, those in the B h and L11 structures are also stable. Using molecular dynamics simulations, we particularly show that CuAu in the B h and L11 structures withstand temperatures as high as 1000 K. Although the interrelationship of the metastability between the BSQ and the 3D structures (B2 and L10 ) is not clear, we fnd that (ii) if CuX in the B2 (L10 ) structure is dynamically stable, that in the L10 (B2) is unstable. This is rationalized by the tetragonal Bain path calculations. Since the synthesis of many atomically thin materials, the two-dimensional (2D) structure has been regarded as one of the metastable structures in materials science, as a result of which the database including several 2D structures can now be available1–5. Many 2D materials can be exfoliated from their three-dimensional (3D) coun- terparts, as the relation between the graphene and the graphite, in turn, implying that the 2D layers can be build- ing blocks for constructing the 3D crystal structures. -
A Preliminary Study of University Students' Collaborative Learning Behavior Patterns in the Context of Online Argumentation Le
A Preliminary Study of University Students’ Collaborative Learning Behavior Patterns in the Context of Online Argumentation Learning Activities: The Role of Idea-Centered Collaborative Argumentation Instruction Ying-Tien Wu, Li-Jen Wang, and Teng-Yao Cheng [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Graduate Institute of Network Learning Technology, National Central University, Taiwan Abstract: Learners have more and more opportunities to encounter a variety of socio-scientific issues (SSIs) and they may have difficulties in collaborative argumentation on SSIs. Knowledge building is a theory about idea-centered collaborative knowledge innovation and creation. The application of idea-centered collaboration practice as emphasized in knowledge building may be helpful for facilitating students’ collaborative argumentation. To examine the perspective above, this study attempted to integrate idea-centered collaboration into argumentation practice. The participants were 48 university students and were randomly divided into experimental and control group (n=24 for both groups). The control group only received argumentation instruction, while the experimental group received explicit idea-centered collaborative argumentation (CA) instruction. This study found that two groups of students revealed different collaborative learning behavior patterns. It is also noted that the students in the experimental group benefited more in collaborative argumentation from the proper adaption of knowledge building and explicit idea-centered collaborative argumentation instruction. Introduction In the knowledge-based societies, learners have more and more opportunities to encounter a variety of social dilemmas coming with rapid development in science and technologies. These social dilemmas are often termed “Socio-scientific issues (SSIs)” which are controversial social issues that are generally ill-structured, open-ended authentic problems which have multiple solutions (Sadler, 2004; Sadler & Zeidler, 2005). -
2016 Bmw Motorsport Junior Programme
BMW Motorsport 2016 BMW MOTORSPORT www.press. Sheer JUNIOR PROGRAMME bmwgroup-sport.com Driving Pleasure MEDIA INFORMATION. BMW MOTORSPORT JUNIOR PROGRAMME. TALENT PROMOTION IN GT RACING. The development of promising talented drivers enjoys a long tradition at BMW Motorsport. In 2014 a new multi-level GT junior concept had been introduced: the BMW Motorsport Junior Programme. This realignment saw BMW Motorsport shift its development of young drivers back to the GT and touring car sector. In Formula racing the concept bore fruit for many years in Formula BMW and the Formula BMW Talent Cup and kick-started the racing career of many successful drivers like Sebastian Vettel, Nico Rosberg and Nico Hülkenberg. The focus is on GT and touring car drivers who already have some racing experience. Outings in the BMW M235i Racing are an integral part of the comprehensive training programme. As well as race starts and test drives, intensive theory courses dealing with fitness and PR are planned, as are mental and simulator training. The potential candidates for this year’s class were put to the test in a shootout in the BMW M235i Racing in Dijon on 10th/11th March. A decision as to which of the young drivers showed the most potential is made by a jury of experts, headed by BMW Motorsport Director Jens Marquardt. BMW works driver Dirk Adorf will act as a mentor for the junior programme. At the end of the year, the most successful BMW Motorsport Junior of the season will be given the opportunity to continue his training for a second year in a higher racing category. -
(Group N) Component Substitution Application Form
5th Category Historic Touring Car (Group N) Component Substitution Application Form Applicant Information Full Name: Savy Dick Last First M.I. Address: 37 Adrian Rd Street Address Campbellfield Vic 3061 City State Postcode Home Phone: ( 03 ) 93576330 Mobile Phone: ( ) 0408 728 967 E-mail Address: [email protected] CAMS Licence No: COD No: Vehicle Information Make of vehicle: Ford Historic Grp.: Nc Model: Mustang / XW GT Falcon Type/identification: Year of manufacture: 1969 / 1970 Year Represents: Chassis No: Component Substitution Give a brief outline or general view of the substitution. To provide a cost effective solution for the engine block in the Mustangs and Falcons that run the 351 Windsor engine in Group Nc Historic Touring Cars. These engines were only made in small numbers compared to other V8 engines, and now almost 50 years on, they are becoming very hard (almost impossible) to find in a serviceable condition. These standard early 351Windsor engine blocks have a common problem of cracking through the main bearing tunnel webbing and the mid 90s blocks commonly crack through the lifter valley area, so after spending a great deal of time trying to find a standard block, you then need to spend even more money and time to crack test these blocks and hope you have found a good one. The engine block we are proposing is a Ford replacement block (similar to the 302 replacement engine block used in Group N already), that is readily available at a reasonable cost both here in Australia and the USA. Page | 1 Wednesday, 20 June 2018 The following Component Substitution Criteria from section 3.6.4 of the CAMS Manual of Motor Sport, 5 th Category Historic Cars must be addressed as part of the submission. -
South African Champions (Up to 2006)
SOUTH AFRICAN CHAMPIONS (UP TO 2006) CIRCUIT CARS: SA MOTOR RACING DRIVERS CHAMPIONSHIP 1953 D.H. Duff 1954 D.E. Jennings 1955 F. Brodie 1956 D.E. Jennings 1957 D.E. Jennings 1958 I.J. Fraser-Jones 1959 I.J. Fraser-Jones 1960 S. van der Vyver 1961 S. van der Vyver 1962 E. Pieterse 1963 N. Lederle 1964 J. Love 1965 J. Love 1966 J. Love 1967 J. Love 1969 J. Love 1970 D. W. Charlton 1971 D.W. Charlton 1972 D.W. Charlton 1973 D.W. Charlton 1974 D.W. Charlton 1975 D.W. Charlton 1976 I. Scheckter 1977 I. Scheckter 1978 I. Scheckter 1979 I. Scheckter 1980 T. Martin 1981 B. Tilanus 1982 G. Duxbury 1983 I. Scheckter 1984 I. Scheckter 1985 T. van Rooyen 1986 W. Taylor 1987 Discontinued SA DRIVERS CHAMPIONSHIP 1990 A. Taylor 1991 M. Briggs 1992 S. van der Linde 1993 D. Vos 1994 M. dos Santos 1995 E. van der Linde 1996 M. Jurgens 1997 J. Smith 1998 J. Smith 1999 J. Fourie 2000 Discontinued SA SALOON CAR CHAMPIONSHIP 1964 J. Swanepoel 1965 J.R. Olthoff 1966 B.V. van Rooyen 1967 B.V. van Rooyen 1968 A.W. Porter 1969 P. Gough 1970 G. Mortimer 1971-1983 Discontinued 1984 H. van der Linde 1985 H. van der Linde 1986 H. van der Linde 1987 J. Coetzee 1988 P. Lanz 1989 J. Coetzee 1990 J. Coetzee 1991 T. Moss 1992 D. Joubert 1993 T. Moss 1994 S. van der Merwe 1995 M. Briggs 1996 T. Moss 1997 G. de Villiers 1998 G. -
CONVERTISSEURS CATALYTIQUES HOMOLOGUES PAR LES ASN CATALYTIC CONVERTERS HOMOLOGATED by the Asns
FIA Liste Technique / Technical List n°8 CONVERTISSEURS CATALYTIQUES HOMOLOGUES PAR LES ASN CATALYTIC CONVERTERS HOMOLOGATED BY THE ASNs LISTE TECHNIQUE N° 8 / TECHNICAL LIST N° 8 Les copies des fiches d'homologation sont disponibles auprès des ASN Copies of the homologation forms are available from the ASNs Fabricant Marquage Information / Information Manufacturer Date Marking (ASN) Cylindrée / Cyl. cap. Type de voiture / Type of car AM Group Redback SBF KAT 08-22 08.08 max. 4000 cm3 (SBF) SBF KAT 09-23 11.09 max. 4000 cm3 2/1412C-10 03.95 ST 2/7612C-10 03.95 ST 2/7622C-10 02.96 ST AUDI AG 2/1012C-10 03.95 ST (DMSB) 2/1013C-10 04.97 ST 2/1014C-10 06.97 ST 2/7623C-10 07.97 ST AUDI SPORT 2/1428C-10 Audi 80 (ST) (DMSB) 2/1512C-10 Audi 80 (ST) ALFA ROMEO 3 CAT 001 - CSAI 06.98 max. 2000 cm Alfa Romeo 156 (M.Y. 1997) (CSAI) max. 2000 cm3 moteurs du groupe BMW DMSB B 1054-10-PE 03.06 2 pieces in // BMW group engines BMW AG max. 5000 cm3 moteurs du groupe BMW DMSB B2/2790-10-PE 5 07.06 (DMSB) 2 pieces in // BMW group engines max. 4000 cm3 moteurs du groupe BMW DMSB B 1052-10 S 03.10 2 pieces in // BMW group engines 2/9074-10 BMW 318i E36/4 ST 2/1059-10 BMW 318i E36/4 ST 2/1590-10 03.95 BMW 320i E36/4 ST BMW M GMBH 2/1592-10 10.95 BMW 320i E36/4 ST (DMSB) 2 /1593-10 02.96 ST DMSB B1054-10 ETCC 04.03 max. -
Southern California Historic Sports Car Festival Auto Club Speedway, Fontana, CA February 7-9, 2020 Track Length - 2.88 Miles
Southern California Historic Sports Car Festival Auto Club Speedway, Fontana, CA February 7-9, 2020 Track Length - 2.88 miles All ticket sales at Ticket Office: Enter Gate one and follow signs for SVRA Registration and Ticket Sales Friday, February 7 Sunday, February 9 Ticket office open 8:00AM-5PM 8:00am—1pm Ticket Office open Hagerty Cars and Caffeine Car Show 10AM-5PM 8:30AM – 4:10PM TESTING All groups 8:30am Group 6 Feature Race 1 8:55am Group 2 Feature Race 1 9:20am Groups 5, 7 Feature Race 1 Saturday, February 8 9:45am Group 10a, 11 Feature Race 1 Ticket Office open 8:00AM-3PM 10:10am Groups 1, 3, 4 Feature Race 1 Hagerty Cars and Caffeine Car Show 10AM-5PM 10:35am Group 8 Feature Race 1 11:00am Group 10b Feature Race 1 8:30am Groups 1, 3, 4 Practice 11:25am Group 9 Feature Race 1 8:55am Group 2 Practice 9:20am Group 10b Practice 11:50am —12:50pm LUNCH BREAK 9:45am Group 6 Practice 12:10pm-12:50pm Car Show Touring Laps 10:10am Group 8 Practice 10:35am Groups 10a, 11 Practice 12:50pm Mustang Reunion Feature Race 11:00am Group 9 Practice 1:15pm Group 8 Feature Race 2 11:25am Groups 5, 7 Practice 1:40pm Groups 5, 7 Feature Race 2 2:05pm Group 9 Feature Race 2 11:50am-12:50pm LUNCH BREAK 2:30pm Group 6 Feature Race 2 12:10pm-12:50pm Car Show Touring Laps 2:55pm Groups 10a, 11 Feature Race 2 3:20pm Group 10b Feature Race 2 12:50pm Groups 1, 3, 4 Qualifying 3:45pm Group 2 Feature Race 2 1:15pm Group 2 Qualifying 4:10pm Groups 1, 3, 4 Feature Race 2 1:40pm Group 10b Qualifying 2:05pm Group 6 Qualifying Victory Circle is located just outside of Garage #2 2:30pm Group 8 Qualifying Following each Feature Race 2 on Sunday. -
Herbicide Group Classification
Herbicide Group Classification Limiting the resistance of weeds to herbicides is a b ig concern for most farmers. Herbicide resistance leads to reduced yields, increased control costs and stress. Traditionally herbicide resistance develops when a producer uses the same herbicide or herbicides with the same mode of action repeatedly over some time. Depending on the cropping system, weeds present and the herbicides used, resistance can develop quickly. In corn production, the presence of triazine resistant lamb’s quarters and pigweed is well documented. They originated with the continuous use of atrazine based products over several years. As a result, similar herbicides, with the same mode of action as atrazine can be ineffective against some of these populations. In recent years, fields in the mid western United States, that have been in continuous Roundup Ready corn and soybean rotations, are showing several glyphosate resistant weed species. There are several ways to minimize herbicide resistance development: Using robust crop rotations, integrating physical weed control strategies (tillage) and rotating herbicides with different modes of action. Herbicide rotation is not as easy as it sounds. Simply using a different herbicide may not give the desired effect of mode of action rotation. Using two different herbicides, with the same mode of action, could illicit the same resistance response in a particular weed. For example, switching from atrazine to simazine may still encourage triazine resistance, as they are both triazines and have similar modes of action. Mode of action: The mode of action indicates the way that a pesticide works to stop the normal function of the pest, and eventually suppress or even kill the pest. -
Specific Guidelines for Group 5 Herbicides
SPECIFIC GUIDELINES FOR GROUP 5 HERBICIDES GROUP 5 HERBICIDE Moderate resistance risk The herbicides in the new CropLife Group 5 and Group 6 were previously all in Group C in Australia. The Mode of Action was described as “Inhibitors of photosynthesis at photosystem II". Now, to match international grouping, this MOA has been split into two, identified as Group 5 (PSII D1 Serine 264 binders) and Group 6 (PSII D1 Histidine 215 binders). The rationale is that there is still no demonstrated target site cross-resistance between these two groups. (GHRAC_MOA_UPDATE_2020). Globally herbicide resistance to the Group 5 herbicide mode of action has been confirmed and documented in more than 70 grass and broadleaf weed species across more than 40 countries. Resistance to the Group 5 mode of action is common; in fact, it is the third most likely herbicide mode of action to develop resistance. In Australia, Group 5 resistance exists in 9 weed species across more than 100 weed populations including more than 50 populations of annual ryegrass, more than 20 populations of wild radish, liverseed grass, squirrel tail fescue (silver grass), dwarf (stinging) nettles, Indian hedge mustard, brome grass and barnyard grass (“at risk weeds”). In all situations the resistance status of “at risk weeds” should be determined prior to sowing. Resistance has developed in broadacre, horticultural and non-crop situations. CropLife Australia gives specific guidelines for the use of Group 5 herbicides in all situations and particularly in triazine tolerant (TT) canola, and canola with both glyphosate tolerance and triazine tolerance (TT- RR canola) following increasing reports of resistance development: • For “at risk weeds”, avoid using Group 5 herbicides as the only means of control in the same paddock in consecutive years.