Transportation System Plan Update City of Forest Grove, Oregon

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Transportation System Plan Update City of Forest Grove, Oregon Transportation System Plan Update City of Forest Grove, Oregon Adopted February 2014 Ordinance 2014-03 DLCD Work Program Approval Order: 001852 June 2014 TSP Update Project Information Project: Transportation System Plan Update Prepared for: City of Forest Grove 1924 Council Street Forest Grove, Oregon 97116 Project Representative Prepared by: SCJ Alliance 315 W Mill Plain Blvd, Suite 208 Vancouver, WA 98660 503.341.6248 www.scjalliance.com In Association with: Nelson-Nygaard Associates Parametrix, Inc. Contact: Anne Sylvester, PTE Daniel Riordan, City of Forest Grove Senior Planner/Project Manager (503) 992-3226 www.forestgrove-or.gov Project Reference: SCJ #805.11 Path: Document1 City of Forest Grove & SCJ Alliance Adopted – February 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Transportation Needs ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1.1 Existing Conditions ....................................................................................................... 1 1.1.2 Future City Growth ....................................................................................................... 2 1.1.3 Future Transportation Needs ....................................................................................... 2 1.1.4 Transportation Plan ...................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Developing a Financially Constrained Transportation Plan....................................................... 5 1.2.1 Transportation Funding ................................................................................................ 5 1.2.2 Revenue Forecast Scenario Projects ............................................................................ 6 2. GOALS, POLICIES and performance measures .............................................................. 11 2.1 Overview.................................................................................................................................. 11 2.2 Goals and Policies .................................................................................................................... 11 2.3 Performance Measures ........................................................................................................... 17 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................................................................................ 21 3.1 Pedestrians .............................................................................................................................. 23 3.2 Bicycles .................................................................................................................................... 25 3.3 Transit ...................................................................................................................................... 25 3.3.1 TriMet Fixed-Route Service ........................................................................................ 29 3.3.2 Yamhill County Transit ............................................................................................... 31 3.3.3 Ride Connection – Washington County Bus ............................................................... 31 3.3.4 Demand Responsive Transit Services ......................................................................... 31 3.3.5 School Bus Service ...................................................................................................... 32 3.3.6 Summary of Key Findings and Conclusions ................................................................ 32 3.4 Motor Vehicles ........................................................................................................................ 33 3.4.1 Functional Classification ............................................................................................. 33 3.4.2 Roadway Jurisdiction .................................................................................................. 37 3.4.3 Roadway Characteristics ............................................................................................ 38 3.4.4 Traffic Levels of Service .............................................................................................. 42 3.4.5 Crash History .............................................................................................................. 45 3.4.6 Trucks ......................................................................................................................... 46 3.5 Rail Transportation .................................................................................................................. 49 3.6 Air Transportation ................................................................................................................... 49 3.7 Water Transportation .............................................................................................................. 49 3.8 Pipelines .................................................................................................................................. 49 4. FUTURE TRAVEL DEMAND ........................................................................................... 51 4.1 Travel Demand and Land Use .................................................................................................. 51 4.1.1 Projected Land Use Growth ....................................................................................... 51 4.2 Travel Forecasting ................................................................................................................... 53 4.2.1 Metro Area Travel Demand Model ............................................................................ 53 4.2.2 Model Verification ...................................................................................................... 55 City of Forest Grove & SCJ Alliance Adopted – February 2014 Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 4.2.3 Model Application to Forest Grove ............................................................................ 55 4.3 Future Traffic Operations Analysis .......................................................................................... 56 4.3.1 Intersection Operation Performance Standards ........................................................ 56 4.3.2 2035 Preferred Land Use Alternative ......................................................................... 56 4.4 Intersection Improvements ..................................................................................................... 59 4.4.1 Improvement Options ................................................................................................ 59 4.4.2 Timing of Need for Intersection Improvements ............ Error! Bookmark not defined. 4.4.3 Potential Impacts of Local Street Improvements on Key Intersections ..................... 60 5. PEDESTRIAN SYSTEM PLAN.......................................................................................... 62 5.1 Preferred Plan Pedestrian Network ........................................................................................ 62 5.1.1 Sidewalks .................................................................................................................... 62 5.1.2 Intersection Improvements ........................................................................................ 63 5.1.3 Signal Timing Evaluation and Modification ................................................................ 63 5.1.4 Innovative Pedestrian Signal Features ....................................................................... 64 5.1.5 Curb Ramps ................................................................................................................ 64 5.1.6 Streetscape Improvements ........................................................................................ 65 5.1.7 Shared Use Paths ........................................................................................................ 65 5.1.8 Opportunities to Formalize/Enhance Existing Paths .................................................. 65 5.1.9 New Path Corridors .................................................................................................... 66 5.1.10 Path Feasibility Studies ............................................................................................... 66 5.1.11 Accessways ................................................................................................................. 66 5.1.12 Pedestrian and Bicycle Access to Transit ................................................................... 66 5.2 Service to Diverse Communities .............................................................................................. 67 5.3 Pedestrian System Project List ................................................................................................ 68 6. BICYCLE SYSTEM PLAN ................................................................................................ 72 6.1 Preferred Plan Bicycle Network .............................................................................................. 72 6.1.1 Bike Lanes ................................................................................................................... 72 6.1.2 Bike Lanes as Part of New Street Construction .......................................................... 73 6.1.3 Bike Lanes as Part of
Recommended publications
  • Please Be Kind to One Another
    SERVING ORGANIZED LABOR IN OREGON AND SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON SINCE 1900 INSIDE OUTSIDE PAGES NORTHWEST HE TOFFICIAL PUBLICBATION UOF LLETIN LABOR Amalgamated Transit Union PRESS Local 757 VOLUME 121, NUMBER 23 PORTLAND, OREGON DECEMBER 4, 2020 President’s Vice President’s Report Roundup Please be kind to one another By Shirley Block By Jonathan Hunt out and getting into trouble when they normally Season’s greetings Sisters and Brothers, wouldn’t. I would like to encourage you to check in with Hello, Brothers and Sisters, I hope you are all able to have your fellow sisters and brothers! First, I want to say I hope everyone had a happy and safe Thanks - a safe holiday with your family. At this point in time it doesn’t appear we’re go - giving. I know this year has been hard on everyone and very dif - With so many things chang - ing to have regular Union Meetings for a while. ferent. I know that none of us thought we would still be dealing ing all around us, we need to However, we are having monthly check-ins and with this virus. And I know that it hits harder when it starts affecting give each other space. We need small Zoom discussions. Please reach out to me the holidays. Most folks that I know stayed home with the family to practice social distancing, but if your work group would like to have a Zoom they live with and relied on Zoom and phone calls to reach out to we also need to be kind to one meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Amberglen Community Plan
    Create a vibrant regional activity center enlivened with high-quality pedestrian and environmental amenities, taking advantage of the region’s light rail system. AmberGlen Community Plan CITY OF HILLSBORO, OREGON Adopted by Ordinance No. 5933, January 19, 2010 AmberGlen Community Plan Adopted by Ordinance No. 5933, January 19, 2010 Prepared by the City of Hillsboro with Cardno WRG David Evans and Associates, Inc. Johnson Reid Land Use Economics 2007 OHSU/AmberGlen Concept Plan Prepared for the City of Hillsboro by PB PlaceMaking Leland Consulting Group Kittelson & Associates, Inc. SWCA Environmental Consultants Cover Illustration Credit: Sabrina Henkhaus, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 2 Purpose..........................................................................................................................2 Plan Organization .........................................................................................................3 BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................... 4 Context...........................................................................................................................4 Planning Process ..........................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • STAFF REPORT To: Daniel L. Dias, Economic and Community Development Director From: Gregg Snyder, Transportation Planning Superv
    STAFF REPORT To: Daniel L. Dias, Economic and Community Development Director From: Gregg Snyder, Transportation Planning Supervisor Don Odermott, Transportation Planning Engineer Date: April 16, 2019 Subject: Letters of Support and Required Mitigation for TriMet’s Red Line Extension and Operational Improvements Project Requested City Council Action: Consider Transportation Committee’s recommendation to City Council to authorize the Mayor to execute two letters to TriMet regarding the Red Line Extension and Operational Improvements Project; one which confers full support of the project and one which requires mitigation of the Red Line Project’s significant impact to multi-modal mobility and safety at the 185th Avenue at-grade crossing. Background/Project Overview: TriMet is currently planning to extend the MAX Red Line from its current terminus at the Beaverton Transit Center out to the Fairplex Station in Hillsboro. According to the analysis completed to date, staff have concerns that the at-grade railroad crossing at 185th Avenue will be significantly affected by the increase in light rail train frequencies. Current traffic analysis is showing an unmitigated double digit increase in vehicle, bus and pedestrian delays and queues in the corridor. At the February 2019 Transportation Committee meeting staff presented the findings of the traffic analysis and discussed next steps which included sending two letters to TriMet. The first letter would confer full support of the project and the second would require mitigation of the Red Line’s significant impact to multi-modal mobility at the grade crossing. Exhibit 1 and Exhibit 2 are the proposed letters that the Transportation Committee is recommending be executed by the Mayor and delivered to TriMet.
    [Show full text]
  • Service Alerts – Digital Displays
    Service Alerts – Digital Displays TriMet has digital displays at most MAX Light Rail stations to provide real-time arrival information as well as service disruption/delay messaging. Some of the displays are flat screens as shown to the right. Others are reader boards. Due to space, the messages need to be as condensed as possible. While we regularly post the same alert at stations along a line, during the Rose Quarter MAX Improvements we provided more specific alerts by geographical locations and even individual stations. This was because the service plan, while best for the majority of riders, was complex and posed communications challenges. MAX Blue Line only displays MAX Blue Line disrupted and frequency reduced. Shuttle buses running between Interstate/Rose Quarter and Lloyd Center stations. trimet.org/rq MAX Blue and Red Line displays page 1 – Beaverton Transit Center to Old Town MAX Blue/Red lines disrupted and frequency reduced. Red Line detoured. Shuttle buses running between Interstate/RQ and Lloyd Center. trimet.org/rq MAX Blue and Red Line displays page 2 – Beaverton Transit Center to Old Town Direct shuttle buses running between Kenton/N Denver Station, being served by Red Line, and PDX. trimet.org/rq MAC Red and Yellow displays – N Albina to Expo Center Red, Yellow lines serving stations btwn Interstate/RQ and Expo Center. trimet.org/rq. Connect with PDX shuttle buses at Kenton. MAX Red display – Parkrose Red Line disrupted, this segment running btwn Gateway and PDX. Use Blue/Green btwn Lloyd Center and Gateway, shuttles btwn Interstate/RQ and Lloyd Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F-1: Westside Service Enhancement Plan
    Appendix F-1: Westside Service Enhancement Plan The following pages are an excerpt from the Westside Service Enhancement Plan showing the direct reference to the Red Line Extension. The full plan is available at https://trimet.org/future/pdf/westside-report.pdf. • Merlo to Progress Ridge/Tigard Extension of service south of the Merlo Rd/158th Ave MAX station connecting with South Beaverton, the Progress Ridge Townsquare, and the Tigard Transit Center. • Willow Creek to the North Hillsboro Industrial Area Extension of service to Cornell Rd., Orenco, Intel Ronler Acres, and the North Hillsboro Industrial Area via Shute Rd. and Brookwood Parkway. Downtown Portland to Progress Ridge Opportunities for action • Extension of peak period express service from Realign bus routes to strengthen a more complete downtown Portland to Progress Ridge north-south and east-west grid, extend MAX Red Townsquare. Line service to Hillsboro and provide frequent or • Downtown Hillsboro to Downtown Beaverton express services on key north- south corridors. New bus line running between Hatfield Complete the grid of bus lines Government Center and Beaverton Transit Extend or change eight bus routes so they better Center via Baseline Rd. and Jenkins Rd. connect with areas of current development and connecting downtown Hillsboro, Willow Creek future growth–residential and employment—and Transit Center, Nike, Cedar Hills Crossing and with MAX and Frequent Service Lines, especially Beaverton Transit Center. going north-south. Improvements include: • North Hillsboro to South Hillsboro Realigned bus service running from Intel Jones Farm to the future South Hillsboro via Brookwood Ave. and TV Highway and connect- ing with MAX at the Fair Complex/Hillsboro Airport Station.
    [Show full text]
  • Yamhill County Transit Area Transit Development Plan
    Transit Development Plan | Memo #2: Existing Conditions Yamhill County Transit Area T Image: Doug Kerr Yamhill County TransitF Area Transit DevelopmentA Plan Memo #2: ExistingR Conditions – Appendices DRAFT D September 2017 Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. | i T APPENDIX A Route Profile Charts andF Tables A R D Transit Development Plan | Memo #2: Existing Conditions – Appendix A Yamhill County Transit Area Table of Contents Page APPENDIX A Route Profile Charts and Tables ........................................................................... i Route 2 ..................................................................................................................................................... A-1 Route 3 ..................................................................................................................................................... A-4 Route 5 ..................................................................................................................................................... A-7 Route 7 ..................................................................................................................................................... A-9 Route 11 ................................................................................................................................................ A-11 Route 22 ................................................................................................................................................ A-14 Route 24S .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • WSK Commuter Rail Study
    Oregon Department of Transportation – Rail Division Oregon Rail Study Appendix I Wilsonville to Salem Commuter Rail Assessment Prepared by: Parsons Brinckerhoff Team Parsons Brinckerhoff Simpson Consulting Sorin Garber Consulting Group Tangent Services Wilbur Smith and Associates April 2010 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................... 3 WHAT IS COMMUTER RAIL? ................................................................................................... 3 GLOSSARY OF TERMS............................................................................................................ 3 STUDY AREA....................................................................................................................... 4 WES COMMUTER RAIL.......................................................................................................... 6 OTHER PASSENGER RAIL SERVICES IN THE CORRIDOR .................................................................. 6 OUTREACH WITH RAILROADS: PNWR AND BNSF .................................................................. 7 PORTLAND & WESTERN RAILROAD........................................................................................... 7 BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY ..................................................................................................... 7 ROUTE CHARACTERISTICS..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MAX Red Line Extension and Reliability Improvements Portland, Oregon Small Starts Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2019)
    MAX Red Line Extension and Reliability Improvements Portland, Oregon Small Starts Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2019) Summary Description Proposed Project: Light Rail Transit 7.8 Miles, 10 Stations Total Capital Cost ($YOE): $206.02 Million Section 5309 CIG Share ($YOE): $100.00 Million (48.5%) Annual Operating Cost (opening year 2023): $6.62 Million Existing Corridor Ridership (Warranted): 20,000 Daily Linked Trips Overall Project Rating: Medium-High Project Justification Rating: Medium Local Financial Commitment Rating: High Project Description: The Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (TriMet) proposes to increase the reliability of the entire MAX light rail system between Portland International Airport and Beaverton Transit Center. The proposed system will extend the existing Red Line service from Beaverton Transit Center to Downtown Hillsboro and improve capacity constraints on the existing system. The project includes track, switch, and signalization work; construction of an operator break facility at the Fair Complex/ Hillsboro Airport Station; double-tracking at the Gateway Transit Center and Portland International Airport Station area, construction of a new storage track at Ruby Junction Rail Yard, and the purchase of six new light rail vehicles. The service is planned to operate 19.5 hours every day, with trains every 7.5 minutes during peak, off-peak and evening hours both during weekdays and weekends. Project Purpose: Currently the west side of the MAX system in the Beaverton area is overcrowded. The single-track segments on the eastern side of the existing MAX system at Portland International Airport and Gateway Transit Center through which all lines of the system travel impose system-wide scheduling constraints.
    [Show full text]
  • WES Commuter Rail Tour Fact Sheet / July 2016
    L ar b om d SMITH AND BYBEE M WETLANDS NATURAL AREA arine Newberry PIER C COLUMBIA RIVER ol tland Expo Center PARK um b or ia P PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL Marine RACEWAY Delta Park/ F essenden Vanport Portland hns International Airport t Jo S idge Kenton/ MLK town Br German N Denver Lombar d N Lombard Transit Center Ai C r WILLAMETTE RIVER olum por bia Mt Hood Ave t Basin Rosa Parks Cascades Kaiser FOREST PARK West Union N Killingsworth Laidlaw Killingsworth COLUMBIA RIVER Cornelius Pass Parkrose/Sumner d Transit Center Evergreen th Yeon Ai N Prescott 82n rpor Marine 85 S ky t 1 BLUE LAKE l i NE PORTLAND Thompson n WESSt Helens COMMUTER RAILS REGIONAL PARK an e dy ncoe Evergreen Overlook MLK BIG FOUR CORNERS Gle e t Park NATURAL AREA hu th S any 5 d 1 r 24th Albina/ d t Beth 223 Cornell Mississippi 33r Sandy J o 1s Sandy C Orenco/NW 231st Ave orne Broadway rd ld ll a Interstate/ n H tfie NW PORTLAND NE 82nd FAIRVIEW is Hawthorn ornell Rose Quarter Halsey to Ha C Halsey 7th r Quatama/ i GovernmentHillsboro Center Central/ Farm 25 GLENN c SE 3rd Transit Center Fair Complex/ NW 205th Ave OTTO C TROUTDALE o Ba Gateway/NE 99th t WOOD seline s Main Hillsboro Airport l Rose Quarter u AUDUBON Transit Center 1 m SANCUTARIES NE 60th 8 VILLAGE / Transit Center Glisan 1 e b Oak 158th id d s tal T rn i u a r o B E 102nd Ave Glisan E 122nd Ave o d ngton/ o R es E 148th Ave E 162nd Ave E 181st Ave u w th Ave n t i r an v 2th d ashi 2 W 1th k a ty Hospi al r e 1 Murray B 1 li W k Stark a r o e G Rockwood/E 188th Ave Willow Creek/ r SE 1 l H ua o HILLSBORO
    [Show full text]
  • Coordinated Transportation Plan for Seniors and Persons with Disabilities I Table of Contents June 2020
    Table of Contents June 2020 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................... 1-1 Development of the CTP .......................................................................................................... 1-3 Principles of the CTP ................................................................................................................ 1-5 Overview of relevant grant programs ..................................................................................... 1-7 TriMet Role as the Special Transportation Fund Agency ........................................................ 1-8 Other State Funding ................................................................................................................. 1-9 Coordination with Metro and Joint Policy Advisory Committee (JPACT) .............................. 1-11 2. Existing Transportation Services ...................................................................... 2-1 Regional Transit Service Providers .......................................................................................... 2-6 Community-Based Transit Providers ..................................................................................... 2-18 Statewide Transit Providers ................................................................................................... 2-26 3. Service Guidelines ........................................................................................... 3-1 History .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MAX Red Line Extension and Reliability Improvements Profile
    MAX Red Line Extension and Reliability Improvements Portland, Oregon Small Starts Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2019) Summary Description Proposed Project: Light Rail Transit 7.8 Miles, 10 Stations Total Capital Cost ($YOE): $206.02 Million Section 5309 CIG Share ($YOE): $100.00 Million (48.5%) Annual Operating Cost (opening year 2023): $6.62 Million Existing Corridor Ridership (Warranted): 20,000 Daily Linked Trips Overall Project Rating: Medium-High Project Justification Rating: Medium Local Financial Commitment Rating: High Project Description: The Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (TriMet) proposes to increase the reliability of the entire MAX light rail system between Portland International Airport and Beaverton Transit Center. The proposed system will extend the existing Red Line service from Beaverton Transit Center to Downtown Hillsboro and improve capacity constraints on the existing system. The project includes track, switch, and signalization work; construction of an operator break facility at the Fair Complex/ Hillsboro Airport Station; double-tracking at the Gateway Transit Center and Portland International Airport Station area, construction of a new storage track at Ruby Junction Rail Yard, and the purchase of six new light rail vehicles. The service is planned to operate 19.5 hours every day, with trains every 7.5 minutes during peak, off-peak and evening hours both during weekdays and weekends. Project Purpose: Currently the west side of the MAX system in the Beaverton area is overcrowded. The single-track segments on the eastern side of the existing MAX system at Portland International Airport and Gateway Transit Center through which all lines of the system travel impose system-wide scheduling constraints.
    [Show full text]
  • Route and Stop Weekdays
    TriMet Passenger Census -Spring 2018 1 All Day Ons and Offs by Route and Stop Weekdays Route: MAX Blue Line - To Gresham Monthly Stop Location Location ID Direction Position Ons Offs Total Lifts Hatfield Government Center MAX Station 9848 S AT 1,088 0 1,088 | 0 Hillsboro Central/SE 3rd TC MAX Station 9846 E AT 751 51 802 | 0 Tuality Hospital/SE 8th Ave MAX Station 9843 E AT 392 74 466 | 0 Washington/SE 12th Ave MAX Station 9841 E AT 363 114 477 | 0 Fair Complex/Hillsboro Airport MAX Stn 9838 E AT 736 106 842 | 0 Hawthorn Farm MAX Station 9839 E AT 276 96 372 | 0 Orenco MAX Station 9835 E AT 918 299 1,217 | 0 Quatama MAX Station 9834 E AT 1,147 255 1,402 | 0 Willow Creek/SW 185th Ave TC MAX Station 9831 E AT 1,263 484 1,747 | 0 Elmonica/SW 170th Ave MAX Station 9830 E AT 1,110 261 1,371 | 0 Merlo Rd/SW 158th Ave MAX Station 9828 E AT 585 215 800 | 0 Beaverton Creek MAX Station 9822 S AT 756 122 878 | 0 Millikan Way MAX Station 9826 E AT 1,083 390 1,473 | 0 Beaverton Central MAX Station 9824 E AT 430 427 857 | 0 Beaverton TC MAX Station 9821 N AT 1,299 1,486 2,785 | 0 Sunset TC MAX Station 9969 E AT 1,275 380 1,655 | 0 Washington Park MAX Station 10120 E AT 289 201 490 | 0 Goose Hollow/SW Jefferson St MAX Station 10118 E AT 254 1,057 1,311 | 0 Kings Hill/SW Salmon St MAX Station 9759 N AT 184 295 479 | 0 Providence Park MAX Station 9758 E AT 748 750 1,498 | 0 Library/SW 9th Ave MAX Station 8333 E AT 750 1,307 2,057 | 0 Pioneer Square South MAX Station 8334 E AT 1,028 2,507 3,535 | 0 Mall/SW 4th Ave MAX Station 8335 E AT 720 1,008 1,728
    [Show full text]