DOCSLIB.ORG

Water Resources Research Center in the District of Columbia: Water

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Water Resources Research Center in the District of Columbia: Water DC WRRC Report. No. 36 UNIVERSITY OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Water Resources Research Center WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Water Supply Management In the District of Columbia: An Institutional Assessment by Daniel P. Beard, Principal Investigator February 1982 WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT IN TI-M DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: AN INSTITUTIONAL ASSESSMENT WRRC Report No. 36 by Or. Daniel Beard ERRATA The following errors should be corrected as follows: Page V-5, Line 11 - The diameter of the conduit from Great Falls is 9 ft. not 90 ft. Page V-6, Line 18 - The operation of the water department of the District is not under the Chief of Engineers. Page V-8, Figure 14 - The line of supply to the Federal Government in Virginia is through the D.C.-DES, not through Arlington County. Page VI-8 - Mr. Jean B. Levesque was the Administrator of the Water Resources Management Administration of the Department of Environmental Services. DISCLAIMER "Contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the United States Department of the Interior, Office of Water Research and Technology, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute their endorsement or recommendation for use by the United States Government”. ABSTRACT This study defines the District of Columbia's water management structure, explains how it operates, delineates the issues it will have to deal with in the 1980's, and assesses how the District is prepared to deal with these issues. The study begins with a description of the Potomac River Basin and the physical environment water managers in the Washington Metropolitan have to deal with. It then discusses the legal and institutional arrangements for managing water supply in the Washington Metropolitan Area for the District of Columbia. The report describes how each water supplier in the Area, including the District, provide water to their customers. Finally, the report presents a discussion of the major water resource management issues facing the District of Columbia. These problems include: adequacy of future supplies; regional cooperation; water supply urgency and drought management; rehabilitation of water supply system; water billing and collection; and, rate increases and conservation pricing. The report also includes a list of research questions under each of the major items discussed in the report as a means of guiding future research efforts on water supply in the District of Columbia. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER I - INTRODUCTION The Water "Crisis" I-1 National Policy Initiatives I-3 National Policy Shift I-5 Water Supply Studies I-6 Metropolitan Area Water Supply Study I-8 Meeting Future Needs I-10 History of Local Cooperation I-11 Local Problems I-11 Resolving Local Problems I-12 District Water System and Its Problems I-12 CHAPTER II - THE POTOMAC RIVER BASIN Tributaries II-1 Precipitation and Runoff II-3 Water Quality II-7 Patuxent River Basin II-10 Potomac Estuary II-12 CHAPTER III - LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL MANAGEMENT OF THE POTOMAC RIVER Introduction III-1 Maryland III-1 Department of Natural Resources III-3 Water Resources Administration III-4 Department of Health and Mental Hygiene III-5 Maryland Potomac Water Authority III-6 Virginia III-7 Legal Regime III-8 State Water Control Board III-9 Department of Health III-10 State Corporation Commission III-10 Local Government Organizations III-11 Maryland III-11 General Governments III-11 Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission III-12 Private Water and Sewage Companies III-14 Virginia III-14 General Government Units III-14 Fairfax County Water Authority III-15 Page CHAPTER IV - WATER SUPPLY IN THE WASHINGTON REGION: AN OVERVIEW Introduction IV-1 Storage Facilities IV-1 North Branch IV-3 Stony River Reservoir and Dam IV-3 Mount Storm Lake IV-3 Bloomington Reservoir and Dam IV-4 Savage River Reservoir and Dam IV-5 Triadelphia and Rocky Gorge Reservoirs IV-6 Occoquan Reservoir and Dam IV-6 Existing Water Supply Facilities IV-7 Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission IV-10 Fairfax County Water Authority IV-11 CHAPTER V - WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Introduction V-1 Legal and Institutional Organization V-1 Washington Aqueduct Division V-4 Treatment and Distribution Facilities V-7 Department of Environmental Services V-15 Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund V-19 Water Resources Management Administration V-23 CHAPTER VI- THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN THE REGIONAL CONTEXT Introduction VI-1 Problem Identification VI-2 Adequacy of Future Supplies VI-2 Regional Cooperation VI-5 Water Supply Emergency and Drought Management VI-10 Rehabilitation of Water System VI 12 Water Billing and Collection VI-20 Rate Increases and Conservation VI-22 Conclusion VI-24 APPENDIX A - PRESIDENT CARTER'S WATER POLICY INITIATIVES APPENDIX B - EXCERPT FROM PUBLIC LAW 93-251 APPENDIX C - PUBLIC LAW 91-407 APPENDIX D - METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON WATER SUPPLY EMERGENCY AGREEMENT, COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS APPENDIX E - BLOOMINGTON LAKE REFORMULATION STUDY APPENDIX F - WATER SUPPLY AND TREAD FACILITIES IN THE 7.10DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA APPENDIX G - WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN WATER SUPPLY TASK FORCE APPENDIX H - "CO-OP": COOPERATIVE WATER SUPPLY OPERATIONS ON THE POTOMAC BIBLIOGRAPHY PREFACE Few subjects have been more thoroughly investigated than providing water supply for the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area (WMA). Report after report has been published, volume after volume has been compiled, and meeting after meeting has been held. The result is a collection of policy, technical and scientific research related to nearly every aspect of water resources in the WMA. 1 Given this history of prolific writing, why do we need another study? Is there something left unsaid or not investigated? The answer to both questions is: "Yes." Too often in a rush to investigate problems, we don't stop to look closely at the tools we presently have at our disposal to solve problems. Before launching out in an effort to solve problems, we should thoroughly understand what resources we have and whether these resources are sufficient to correct the problems. This report takes that approach. The report seeks to gain a better understanding of the water problems of the District of Columbia and to see how existing institutions are dealing with those problems. As a result, this report does not contain any clarion warnings about an impending water crisis. Neither does it call for any new programs, regulations, compacts, or massive reorganizations. Rather, this report is intended to describe and assess has the District of Columbia and surrounding jurisdictions are organized to provide water supplies. The objective is to understand how the present system works and to assess whether the organizations supplying water appear prepared to meet the _______________________ 1Despite all this activity, there are no comprehensive bibliographies or compendiums of literature on this subject. vi The author would like to thank all the water officials in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area who generously consented to interviews and were most willing to provide information. As always, the conclusions drawn in this report do not reflect the views of any institution, organization or government; they remain solely those of the author. CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION The people of the United States are in no danger of any early shortage of water--the facts just do not bear that out. But we are going to have to work out new methods of managing water. -Gilbert F. White. Probably nothing is more intrinsically political than the allocation of water among differ- ent regions and competing uses. -Robert E. Reinhold2 The Water "Crisis" Water is a fundamental prerequisite for life, and as a result, it has always been a central concern of every society. Man has constantly struggled to adapt and/or control the water resources of a given environment. And in many respects, it is no different today than it was thousands of years ago. It has been fashionable in the popular press to speak of an impending "water crisis" similar to the energy crisis which has plagued the United States for nearly a decade.3 Yet the water problems the United States faces have only reached "crisis" proportions in isolated areas and for only short periods of time. Despite repeated warnings of a "crisis," the United States is endowed with bountiful supplies that should be adequate to support the 1As quoted in R. Reinhold, "Nation's Water Is Bountiful, but Supplies Are Squandered," New York Times, August 9, 1981, p. 1. 2Ibid., p. 48. 3The literature on the "water crisis" is extensive. A good summary is found in "The Browning of America," Newsweek, February 23, 1981, pp. 26-37. Other sources include: N. Wollman and G. Bonem, The Outlook for Water Quality, Quantity and National Growth (Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins Press, 1971); U.S. Congress, Senate, Comnittee on Environment and Public Works, State and National Water Use Trends to the Year 2000, 96th Cong. 2nd Sess. (Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1980); U.S. National Water Commission, Water Policies for the Future (Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1973); U.S. Congress, Senate, Committee on Environment and Public Works, Subcommittee on Water Resources, Priority Setting for Water Resources Projects and Programs, 96th Cong., 2nd Sess. (Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1980); and U.S. General Accounting Office, Water Resources Planning, Management and Development: What Are the Nations Water Suppler Problems and and Issues?, Pub. No. CED-77-100 (Washington, D.C.: GAO, 1977). nation for generations.4 Nevertheless, the United States does have a water problem. As the Water Resources Council has observed: There is no denying that without renewed dedication to careful management of water resources, pressures from the population of our technological society will seriously deplete and foul the water to the extent that it threatens the very survival of the United States...
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Retrospective Tiered Environmental Assessment of the Mount Storm Wind Energy Facility, West Virginia, Usa
    - ORNL/TM-2012/515 A RETROSPECTIVE TIERED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF THE MOUNT STORM WIND ENERGY FACILITY, WEST VIRGINIA, USA November 26, 2012 Rebecca A. Efroymson and Robin J. Day Oak Ridge National Laboratory M. Dale Strickland Western EcoSystems Technology DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY Reports produced after January 1, 1996, are generally available free via the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Information Bridge. Web site http://www.osti.gov/bridge Reports produced before January 1, 1996, may be purchased by members of the public from the following source. National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 Telephone 703-605-6000 (1-800-553-6847) TDD 703-487-4639 Fax 703-605-6900 E-mail [email protected] Web site http://www.ntis.gov/support/ordernowabout.htm Reports are available to DOE employees, DOE contractors, Energy Technology Data Exchange (ETDE) representatives, and International Nuclear Information System (INIS) representatives from the following source. Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Telephone 865-576-8401 Fax 865-576-5728 E-mail [email protected] Web site http://www.osti.gov/contact.html This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Participant Statistical Areas Program Verification
    39.338794N 2020 PSAP VERIFICATION (PSAPV) - CENSUS TRACT CODE REVIEW MAP: Tucker County, WV 39.335839N 79.842446W 79.282054W S a un r ny o sid Rd r e e R 26 u ik d n d A P tow orge R Kane e W H r G a e d s hingt o v on wy i R H 50 ll F R hurch o i r ll e w C y R e e d t t d R i h l S 72 el 50 W G D d 50 a y R r d re n d t ha e Aurora R t S s itt H e w w d e y il D 50 en W B g in 219 K d venb 50 R Ste urg d 24 50 l R o d y Rd 50 on ho w b c Geor H ib S ge Washi R n n g gton Hwy e so d n u n R i l a orman R i r B k M G n 50 p a S R le p 560 a M /5 te 76 ollo o R Dayt tone H w Rd C on S B o lya rd n Rd Georg ma e Wa Gor sco L sh er d Ro a in y R n te ill t g S ll H z t Be o R n d Hw Grange Hall 219 y glon Rd 50 R E S M te e a v nburg d p en teve le bu S R rg o S B c d p ir k R r ch y 72 in Cas d lley Hw d g h Ro t R Va n Va o t la H lle 50 l a e Is w y o R h y d o C n d h e 50 ge R c v id e R S w S o rr 6 24 a R 1 N ts d a r Mo e Rd b ge Gorman m Rid u e N pl m te S Sn y yder w H H o tt llo e w rr d 90 a R G k K c no o tt R s 219 e l F b V e a Rd 50 C l T a a t d on l h o or le e n l R C a H a n Rd y t i rt o ill H ll o ls e H 50 w Rd P i ous y ent D W th Accid Al Rd y ar d a ay W B rk 72 a P d 90 e in o W F ses h G airview C S Hor neg hurch R in d y Chur d Bayard c n R ch l u Rd a l R r i nak T r S e Rd R y a e c d l l e a n V e S n s 24 i e v e s a t r G D H 219 - ir e a e l L inc d S R lli H n a ilson Rd m W w o d PRESTON 077 B R ds lan d n Is R Seve TUCKER 093 e Ridg ry er d h R C d k R c s a t B a l g F A les Rd o l Sca d H B o ro o
    [Show full text]
  • Health and History of the North Branch of the Potomac River
    Health and History of the North Branch of the Potomac River North Fork Watershed Project/Friends of Blackwater MAY 2009 This report was made possible by a generous donation from the MARPAT Foundation. DRAFT 2 DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 TABLE OF Figures ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 THE UPPER NORTH BRANCH POTOMAC RIVER WATERSHED ................................................................................... 7 PART I ‐ General Information about the North Branch Potomac Watershed ........................................................... 8 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 Geography and Geology of the Watershed Area ................................................................................................. 9 Demographics .................................................................................................................................................... 10 Land Use ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DC Flood Insurance Study
    DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WASHINGTON, D.C. REVISED: SEPTEMBER 27, 2010 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 110001V000A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panels for this community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map panels (e.g., floodways and cross sections). In addition, former flood insurance risk zone designations have been changed as follows. Old Zone(s) New Zone A1 – A30 AE V1 – V30 VE B X C X The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult with community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. Initial FIS Effective Date: November 15, 1985 Revised FIS Date: September 27, 2010 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Class G Tables of Geographic Cutter Numbers: Maps -- by Region Or
    G3862 SOUTHERN STATES. REGIONS, NATURAL G3862 FEATURES, ETC. .C55 Clayton Aquifer .C6 Coasts .E8 Eutaw Aquifer .G8 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway .L6 Louisville and Nashville Railroad 525 G3867 SOUTHEASTERN STATES. REGIONS, NATURAL G3867 FEATURES, ETC. .C5 Chattahoochee River .C8 Cumberland Gap National Historical Park .C85 Cumberland Mountains .F55 Floridan Aquifer .G8 Gulf Islands National Seashore .H5 Hiwassee River .J4 Jefferson National Forest .L5 Little Tennessee River .O8 Overmountain Victory National Historic Trail 526 G3872 SOUTHEAST ATLANTIC STATES. REGIONS, G3872 NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. .B6 Blue Ridge Mountains .C5 Chattooga River .C52 Chattooga River [wild & scenic river] .C6 Coasts .E4 Ellicott Rock Wilderness Area .N4 New River .S3 Sandhills 527 G3882 VIRGINIA. REGIONS, NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. G3882 .A3 Accotink, Lake .A43 Alexanders Island .A44 Alexandria Canal .A46 Amelia Wildlife Management Area .A5 Anna, Lake .A62 Appomattox River .A64 Arlington Boulevard .A66 Arlington Estate .A68 Arlington House, the Robert E. Lee Memorial .A7 Arlington National Cemetery .A8 Ash-Lawn Highland .A85 Assawoman Island .A89 Asylum Creek .B3 Back Bay [VA & NC] .B33 Back Bay National Wildlife Refuge .B35 Baker Island .B37 Barbours Creek Wilderness .B38 Barboursville Basin [geologic basin] .B39 Barcroft, Lake .B395 Battery Cove .B4 Beach Creek .B43 Bear Creek Lake State Park .B44 Beech Forest .B454 Belle Isle [Lancaster County] .B455 Belle Isle [Richmond] .B458 Berkeley Island .B46 Berkeley Plantation .B53 Big Bethel Reservoir .B542 Big Island [Amherst County] .B543 Big Island [Bedford County] .B544 Big Island [Fluvanna County] .B545 Big Island [Gloucester County] .B547 Big Island [New Kent County] .B548 Big Island [Virginia Beach] .B55 Blackwater River .B56 Bluestone River [VA & WV] .B57 Bolling Island .B6 Booker T.
    [Show full text]
  • Scanned Document
    1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION EASTERN SERVICE AREA CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DECLARATION/RECORD OF DECISION The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has determined that the following proposed airspace procedure changes associated with Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA) are categorically excluded from further environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). To enhance national security, and in response to a request from the United States Secret Service (USSS), the proposed action amends eight existing north flow standard instrument departures (SIDs) by moving one waypoint approximately 784 feet to the southwest to direct aircraft further away from protected airspace above the White House and Naval Observatory. Additionally, in response to a request from the Reagan National Community Noise Working Group, the proposed action amends one waypoint on six existing SIDs, which will route aircraft closer to the Potomac River. Furthermore, the proposed action will establish the AMEEE1 SID to replace the HOLTB1 and BOOCK3, both of which will be canceled. The AMEEE procedure will use the new waypoint established for national security, and will otherwise not change from the procedures it is replacing. Finally, to integrate air traffic with the Northeast Corridor (NEC) and Atlantic Coast Routes (ACR) procedures, the action proposes to implement the SCOOB transition by extending the AMEEE (HOLTB/BOOCK replacement procedure) enroute transition beyond waypoint COLIN to SCOOB. This final action also requires amending the Baltimore Washington Airport (BWI) CONLE SID and Dulles Airport (IAD) JCOBY SID to establish the SCOOB Transition beyond COLIN waypoint. The SCOOB transition will be used for aircraft flying over 18,000 feet above ground level (AGL).
    [Show full text]
  • Jackson@Lyattorneys at Law Pllc
    JACKSON@LYATTORNEYS AT LAW PLLC 1600 IAIDLMTOWER PO.BOX 553 * CHARLESTON,WESTVlRGlNIA 25322 ‘TELEPHONE: 304-340-1000 *TELECOPIER 304-340-1 I30 wJacksonkelly.com Direct Dial No. (304) 340- 1251 e-mail: [email protected] State Bar ID No. 599 1 September 24,2002 Via hand delivery Sandra Squire, Executive Secretary $5 Public Service Commission of West Virginia 201 Brooks Street Post Office Box 8 12 Charleston, West Virginia 25323 Re: Case No. 02- 1189-E-CN NedPower Mount Storm LLC Dear Ms. Squire: Enclosed please find an original and six copies of an “Endangered Species Status and Phase I Avian Risk Assessment” for the Project prepared by Potesta & Associates, Inc., NedPower’s environmental consultants on the Project (“Study”). In the Study, Potesta summarizes three assessments performed in L.c% connection with the Project and attached to the Study as Appendices A, B and C, respectively: A. “Surveys for Potential Habitat of the West Virginia Northern Flying Squirrel at the Proposed NedPower Mount Storm LLC Windmill Turbines Project Site,” prepared by Dr. Edwin D. Michael, Professor Emeritus, West Virginia University; B. “Habitat Assessments for Potential Habitat of Cheat Mountain Salamanders (Plethodon nettingi) in Proposed Windmill Sites of the NedPower Mount Storm LLC,” prepared by Dr. Thomas K. Pauley, Professor, Marshall University; and C. “Phase I Avian Risk Assessment for a Proposed Wind Farm in Grant County, West Virginia,” prepared by Dr. Ronald A. Canterbury, Professor, Concord College. We would be pleased to provide additional copies of the Study to the Commissioners shouy they so request. #L ~ . , - -.* %,, . ,- ,, > Was~~.C~~~~~~,*~in~on,KY Fairmont, WV Martinsburg, WV Wheeling, WV Morgantown, WV New Martinsville,WV Parkersburg,WV , .
    [Show full text]
  • District of Columbia Washington, D.C
    DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WASHINGTON, D.C. REVISED: SEPTEMBER 27, 2010 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 110001V000A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panels for this community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map panels (e.g., floodways and cross sections). In addition, former flood insurance risk zone designations have been changed as follows. Old Zone(s) New Zone A1 – A30 AE V1 – V30 VE B X C X The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult with community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. Initial FIS Effective Date: November 15, 1985 Revised FIS Date: September 27, 2010 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington
    VOL. XIV, PP, 47-86 JUNE 19, 1901 PROCEEDINGS OF THE BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON SIXTH LIST OF ADDITIONS TO THE FLORA OF WASHINGTON, D. C. AND VICINITY. BY EDWARD S. STEELE. WITH DESCRIPTIONS OF NEW SPECIES AND VARIETIES BY EDWARD L. GREENE, ALVAH A. EATON, AND THE AUTHOR. The following list is based upon a course of collecting prose cuted outside of my routine work for five years beginning with 1896. The general purpose has been merely to record names of new and less familiar plants, with stations; but advantage has been taken of the opportunity to publish a few descriptions of new local material and to record some observations. Professor Greene has kindly furnished for publication here a name and character for a new violet which I was so fortunate as to discover. Mr. Alvah A. Eaton describes two new forms of Isoetes, which are not, however, my own discoveries. I propose a segregate from the Lycopus virginicus of authors, a well-marked species long since noticed, but apparently never properly named. In an extended note on Vernonia glauca I hope to have set that species in a somewhat clearer light. Other notes are scattered through the list. I am indebted to several gentlemen for the revision of my determinations, particularly to Mr. L. H. Dewey, who studied all my earlier collections of grasses. The dichotomous Pani- JO BIOL. Soc. WASH. VOL. XIV, 1901. (47) 48 Steele Additions to the Flora, of Washington. cums I have of late left wholly to the skill and kindness of Mr. E.
    [Show full text]
  • Ch1 4.Pdf (2.873Mb)
    Chapter 1 Introduction: A Site, Questions… Ruins provide the incentive for restoration…There has to be an interim… of death or rejection before there can be renewal and reform. The old order has to die before there can be a born-again landscape. John Brinckerhoff Jackson (Jackson 1980,102) In the summer 2001, while exploring thesis possibilities, the author made two impor- tant discoveries. The first related to the Society for Industrial Archeology (SIA). Although founded in Washington, DC, in 1971, it took 30 years before the Society returned to hold an annual conference in the nation’s capital. At the time, the Society recognized that few considered Washington a prime candidate for the exploration of industrial heritage. Yet while Washington’s heritage never duplicated that of cities such as Pittsburgh and Buffalo, the capital had evolved its own industrial heritage, one notable example of which was the Washington Aqueduct and its McMillan Reservoir Sand Filtration Plant, the largest slow sand filtration system built in the United States (SIA 2001). A second discovery came from an old issue of Landscape Architecture magazine. In late 1992, the magazine conducted a small informal work- shop (LA Forum) to explore revival of the McMillan plant site that had been closed to the public since World War II and abandoned since the late 1980s. Workshop par- 1.2 Site from First Street ticipants visited not only a 25-acre industrial ruin but also the remnants of a park designed and installed atop it by Frederick Law Olmsted, Jr. as an offshoot of the 1902 McMillan Plan for the capital’s park system.
    [Show full text]
  • Drinking Water Supply in the Washington, D.C. Metropolitan Area: Prospects and Options for the 21St Century
    LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA WATER SUPPLY TASK FORCE DRINKING WATER SUPPLY IN THE WASHINGTON, D.C. METROPOLITAN AREA: PROSPECTS AND OPTIONS FOR THE 21ST CENTURY February, 1999 LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA WATER SUPPLY TASK FORCE Published by: League of Women Voters of the National Capital Area Washington, D.C. Copyright: © February 1999, The League of Women Voters of the National Capital Area Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication or resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: League of Women Voters of the National Capital Area, Water Supply Task Force, February 1999, Drinking Water Supply in the Washington, D.C. Metropolitan Area: Prospects and Options for the 21st Century. (Washington, D.C.: League of Women Voters of the National Capital Area) Information: As of January 2012, copies of this report and of its executive summary may be found on the world wide web at http://www.joyhecht.net/professional.html. For further information, please contact: Dr. Joy E. Hecht, chair Water Supply Task Force 1-202-494-1162 [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES………………………………………………………………………………………. i LIST OF FIGURES………………………………………………………………………………………. i LIST OF ACRONYMS…………………………………………………………………………………. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………………………………………. iii MEMBERS OF THE WATER SUPPLY TASK FORCE……………………………………………………. iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ………………………………………………………………………………. v 1. INTRODUCTION: THE PROBLEM ……………………………………………………………. 1 2. BACKGROUND: THE REGION'S WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM …………………………………… 3 3. PROJECTIONS OF SUPPLY AND DEMAND ……………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • February 2015 Volume 46, No
    The newsletter of the Montgomery Bird Club of the Maryland Ornithological Society February 2015 Volume 46, No. 1 President’s Chat aving just returned from to the Joy of Birding nature a family (non-birding) camp in Hog Island, Maine. vacation in Argentina, Congratulations to Carolyn! HI am now back to the reality of On the back of this Chat is the the cold winter in Montgomery signup form for our Club Social County. Quite the contrast from on Friday, March 20, at the ANS relaxing in a comfortable chair Woodend mansion. This is a great enjoying one of Mendoza’s fine chance for all of us to get together Malbecs while leisurely watching over delicious food, chat, and be Southern Lapwings with 90oF amazed at the wonderful photos presented temperatures! by our members. I encourage you to sign up early Just a reminder that our inclement weather policy since space is limited. Please contact Clive Harris is that if Montgomery County public schools are ([email protected]) if you would like to closed for the day or if evening activities have help with the Social or can bring appetizers. been cancelled, our meeting will also be cancelled. Good birding! An additional reminder that we have many good —Ed Patten field trips on the schedule. Check the calendar, and get out in the field. See what birds are in Montgomery County this season. CONTENTS We are in need of some volunteers for the Chat. Susan Hunt is retiring as editor. The May issue Winter/Spring Calendar ...............................................2 will be her last.
    [Show full text]