01DUEP-Prelims (V-X)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

01DUEP-Prelims (V-X) Contents Acknowledgments vii Preface viii 1. Biographical Background and Analytical Analysis 1 2. Influences of the Times: The 1930s 7 3. Leon H. Keyserling and the Council of Economic Advisers 17 Introduction 17 The Employment Act 19 The historical record of the Council, 1946–53 27 The Eisenhower comparison: a brief note 53 The Council, 1946–53: an overview 57 Appendix 1: A Personal Postscript 60 Appendix 2: Keyserling’s Anti-inflationary Policy and Cost Curves: A Simplified Analysis 61 4. Selected Testimonies: Hearings Before the Joint Economic Committee of Congress (HJEC) 64 Introduction 64 The Council years, selected testimony 66 The post Council years, selected testimony 68 Conclusion 80 5. Keyserling after the Council of Economic Advisers: “The Conference on Economic Progress” 82 Introduction 82 A selected review: The Conference on Economic Progress 83 6. Other Writings of Leon H. Keyserling: The Problems of Economic Balance and the End of Poverty – the Crucial Connection 133 The balanced economy and progress of poverty: the vital interdependence 133 v vi Contents 7. The Theoretical Analysis of Leon H. Keyserling and Economic Policy 141 Appendix 1: The Concept of Economic Growth in Economic Analysis 157 Appendix 2: Brief Chronology and Biographical References by Leon H. Keyserling (Edited: W. Robert Brazelton) 160 Appendix 3: Other Related Articles, Not Quoted Herein (But Presented to Author by Leon H. Keyserling) 162 Appendix 4: Book-Length Publications of Leon H. Keyserling 166 (Conference on Economic Progress) Notes 168 Bibliography 169 Index 177 Acknowledgments The author wishes to thank Dr Benjamin Zobrist, former Director of the Harry S. Truman Library, a Presidential Library, for financial support for the original study of Keyserling and the economic policies of the Truman era. The author also wishes to thank Dennis Bilger and others of the Harry S. Truman Library, Independence, Missouri, USA, for their aid, patience, and cooperation. Any acknowledgement would be incomplete without a special mention of Dr Willadee Gillan Wehmeyer who worked with me on the original report to the Truman Library on the research project financed by that Library. That project included both an analytical biography of both Leon Hirsch Keyserling and, also, his wife – a respected economist and “feminist” in her own right – Mary Dublin Keyserling entitled: Leon H. Keyserling and Mary Dublin Keyserling, Growth and Equity: Over Fifty Years of Economic Policy and Analysis, from Truman to Bush, 1989, Truman Library, Independence, Missouri, USA. Special thanks go to both Leon Keyserling and Mary Keyserling. Their cooperation was crucial, and the association with them is a bright spot in my memory. Thanks, also to my typist, Linda Raske; my Doctoral Assistant, Jessie Jo Johnson, whose advice, sincere interest, patience, and pre- editing were crucial. Also, I would be remiss not to mention David Lazarus and the other staff members in Government Documents at the Miller Nichols Library of the University of Missouri–Kansas City for their aid and patience. Naturally, all errors, oversights, et alius herein are the author’s. vii Preface This book is a revision of a previous study, supported by the Harry S. Truman Library, Independence, Missouri, USA, by myself and Willadee Gillan Wehmeyer, a graduate student at the University of Missouri–Kansas City, and now an instructor at Central Nazarene University, Olathe, Kansas. The Truman Library study involved several interviews, usually of several days in length, with both Leon Hirsch Keyserling and his wife, Mary Dublin Keyserling, in their home in Washington, DC. In the original study, both Chapter I and Chapter II were personal in nature. Chapter I involved the personal recollections of Willadee and myself concerning the Keyserlings. Chapter II involved the Keyserlings’ personal stories concerning events, personalities, con- versations between personalities, et cetera, that are of great interest to historians and biographers. However, in this book, both chapters have been deleted for a study of the economic events and of econ- omic thought that existed at the time of the Keyserlings’ youth; their years of education; and the economic realities of the United States in the pre-World War II and the post-World War II periods. Thus, this specific book is more for economists or economic stu- dents and interested lay persons, rather than historians and bio- graphers of the Truman Era. For those who wish to read the original study by Willadee and myself, it is available in Independence, Missouri at the Harry S. Truman Library, Independence, Missouri, USA. The original copy on deposit at the Truman Presidential Library included both a study of Leon H. Keyserling and Mary Dublin Keyserling by myself and Willadee Wehmeyer. After that study, Dr Wehmeyer completed her Doctoral dissertation on Mary Dublin Keyserling (Mary Dublin Keyserling: Economist and Social Activist, University of Missouri–Kansas City, 1994) which expanded upon her contribution to the original work on the Keyserlings. This present work includes only an analysis of Leon Keyserling by myself. The work on Mary Dublin Keyserling will be published separately by Dr Wehmeyer. It is, I believe, an important work in viii Preface ix relation to the Roosevelt-Truman eras, and of the women’s movement of that and later periods. W. Robert Brazelton 1 Biographical Background and Analytical Analysis Leon Hirsch Keyserling was born in Charleston, South Carolina, on January 2, 1908, the son of a prominent Jewish family; and lived his first eight years in St. Helena Island, South Carolina, near Beaufort, South Carolina. His father, William Keyserling, was a prosperous and influential farmer, growing and marketing fruits and vegetables. After Leon Keyserling’s graduation from high school in Beaufort in 1924, he went to Columbia University in New York City and became a student of Rexford Guy Tugwell. Later, he received a Law degree from Harvard University before returning to Columbia University to work on his Doctorate in Economics, which he never finished. However, during that time, he was busy helping Rexford Tugwell in his writing; and in doing his own writings. And later, as he often said, he was busy composing and lobbying for legislation concerning the Labor acts, the Housing acts, the Employment act, et alius, which, to him, outweighed a dissertation. Later, he became Vice Chair of the Council of Economic Advisors to the President and succeeded to its Chairmanship after Edwin Nourse’s resigna- tion, partly for Nourse’s refusal to testify on economic policy matters before Congress – a task Keyserling considered both a neces- sity and a duty in order to support the President’s economic policies before Congress and the Nation. Keyserling’s policies were policies of growth, as will be seen in later chapters. Many economists argue that a growing economy, like a rising tide, raises all ships. Keyserling recognized, however, that some ships would not rise as fast as others or, without aid, may not rise at all. Thus, economic growth was a necessary condition for 1 2 Designing US Economic Policy increasing wealth, but, by itself, was not a sufficient condition. As some sectors of the economy were weaker than others; or, as some groups were weaker than other groups, those groups must be select- ively helped by selective policies or selective controls. Thus, anti- recessionary, pro-growth policies should stimulate the overall economy and help lagging sectors as well by selective methods relating to those lagging sectors. This view of anti-recessionary policy was continued into Key- serling’s view of anti-inflationary policy as well. An inflation can be argued to be caused by an excess of demand over supply. This Keyserling translated as a lag in supply in relation to demand. Thus, even though anti-inflationary policy should dampen overall inflationary pressures, it should also stimulate the growth of supply of lagging areas, especially those areas of high priority (for example, housing and the jobs related to housing). Then, even though an anti-inflationary policy may be less lenient than would be an anti- recessionary policy, it must allow for selective sectors to continue to expand via selective controls or interest rates. For example, if housing was in short supply and widgets in excess supply, anti- inflationary policy should restrict the latter, not the former. Also, to Keyserling, the high interest rates caused by anti-inflationary policy were a high cost to the economy and would have to be paid over a long period of time by taxpayers and debtors to bond holders and creditors. Thus, in general, Keyserling believed that interest rates, even in an inflation, should be kept low, and, if increased, only where needed, selectively on a micro level, not a primarily or exclusively macro level. In light of Keyserling’s view of interest rates, Keyserling dis- approved of the “Accord” between the Federal Reserve and the United States Treasury in 1951. In the post-World War II, period, the Federal Reserve had “agreed” to purchase Treasury bonds at a set rate of interest. This essentially pegged the interest rate. The interest rate was low and allowed the Treasury to float its bonds without fear of rising interest rates which may be considered as allowing the Treasury to increase debt, which could result in inflation. The reason for this policy was to keep interest rates low; and to belie the fear that the post-World War II years would duplicate the stagnation of the 1930s and the instabilities of the 1920s. However, as expan- sion – not contraction – was the post-war reality, many believed that such a policy was not needed. Thus, after the Accord of 1951, Biographical Background and Analytical Analysis 3 the Federal Reserve no longer pegged the interest rate which meant that Treasury deficits (bonds) did not have a guaranteed market at a guaranteed interest rate.
Recommended publications
  • Uncorrected Transcript
    1 CEA-2016/02/11 THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION FALK AUDITORIUM THE COUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISERS: 70 YEARS OF ADVISING THE PRESIDENT Washington, D.C. Thursday, February 11, 2016 PARTICIPANTS: Welcome: DAVID WESSEL Director, The Hutchins Center on Monetary and Fiscal Policy; Senior Fellow, Economic Studies The Brookings Institution JASON FURMAN Chairman The White House Council of Economic Advisers Opening Remarks: ROGER PORTER IBM Professor of Business and Government, Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government, The John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University Panel 1: The CEA in Moments of Crisis: DAVID WESSEL, Moderator Director, The Hutchins Center on Monetary and Fiscal Policy; Senior Fellow, Economic Studies The Brookings Institution ALAN GREENSPAN President, Greenspan Associates, LLC, Former CEA Chairman (Ford: 1974-77) AUSTAN GOOLSBEE Robert P. Gwinn Professor of Economics, The Booth School of Business at the University of Chicago, Former CEA Chairman (Obama: 2010-11) PARTICIPANTS (CONT’D): GLENN HUBBARD Dean & Russell L. Carson Professor of Finance and Economics, Columbia Business School Former CEA Chairman (GWB: 2001-03) ALAN KRUEGER Bendheim Professor of Economics and Public Affairs, Princeton University, Former CEA Chairman (Obama: 2011-13) ANDERSON COURT REPORTING 706 Duke Street, Suite 100 Alexandria, VA 22314 Phone (703) 519-7180 Fax (703) 519-7190 2 CEA-2016/02/11 Panel 2: The CEA and Policymaking: RUTH MARCUS, Moderator Columnist, The Washington Post KATHARINE ABRAHAM Director, Maryland Center for Economics and Policy, Professor, Survey Methodology & Economics, The University of Maryland; Former CEA Member (Obama: 2011-13) MARTIN BAILY Senior Fellow and Bernard L. Schwartz Chair in Economic Policy Development, The Brookings Institution; Former CEA Chairman (Clinton: 1999-2001) MARTIN FELDSTEIN George F.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Report of the President.” ______
    REFERENCES Chapter 1 American Civil Liberties Union. 2013. “The War on Marijuana in Black and White.” Accessed January 31, 2016. Aizer, Anna, Shari Eli, Joseph P. Ferrie, and Adriana Lleras-Muney. 2014. “The Long Term Impact of Cash Transfers to Poor Families.” NBER Working Paper 20103. Autor, David. 2010. “The Polarization of Job Opportunities in the U.S. Labor Market.” Center for American Progress, the Hamilton Project. Bakija, Jon, Adam Cole and Bradley T. Heim. 2010. “Jobs and Income Growth of Top Earners and the Causes of Changing Income Inequality: Evidence from U.S. Tax Return Data.” Department of Economics Working Paper 2010–24. Williams College. Boskin, Michael J. 1972. “Unions and Relative Real Wages.” The American Economic Review 62(3): 466-472. Bricker, Jesse, Lisa J. Dettling, Alice Henriques, Joanne W. Hsu, Kevin B. Moore, John Sabelhaus, Jeffrey Thompson, and Richard A. Windle. 2014. “Changes in U.S. Family Finances from 2010 to 2013: Evidence from the Survey of Consumer Finances.” Federal Reserve Bulletin, Vol. 100, No. 4. Brown, David W., Amanda E. Kowalski, and Ithai Z. Lurie. 2015. “Medicaid as an Investment in Children: What is the Long-term Impact on Tax Receipts?” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 20835. Card, David, Thomas Lemieux, and W. Craig Riddell. 2004. “Unions and Wage Inequality.” Journal of Labor Research, 25(4): 519-559. 331 Carson, Ann. 2015. “Prisoners in 2014.” Bureau of Justice Statistics, Depart- ment of Justice. Chetty, Raj, Nathaniel Hendren, Patrick Kline, Emmanuel Saez, and Nich- olas Turner. 2014. “Is the United States Still a Land of Opportunity? Recent Trends in Intergenerational Mobility.” NBER Working Paper 19844.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (Pdf)
    Can a Safety Net Subsidy Be Contained? John R. Walter n 1997 the U.S. Congress introduced legislation that would broaden op- portunities for combining banks with nonbank ®nancial and non®nancial I businesses.1 There has been some concern, however, that such combina- tions would possibly allow a safety net subsidy that banks might receive to spill over to nonbanking companies af®liated with banks. In response to the concern, supporters of this reform have suggested various proposals to try to keep a subsidy within the bank itself.2 Two mechanisms, in particular, have received considerable attention: the ®rst would restrict nonbanking activities to bank holding company (BHC) subsidiaries and deny them to bank subsidiaries; the second would allow nonbank activities in bank subsidiaries but restrict intracompany transactions.3 In this article, I assess the potential of these proposals to contain any ex- isting safety net subsidy, without evaluating the usefulness of the proposals for other purposes.4 I explain how supervisory and regulatory policies that support This article bene®ted greatly from suggestions from Marvin Goodfriend, Thomas Humphrey, Rowena Johnson, Wenli Li, Elaine Mandaleris, Roy Webb, and John Weinberg. The views expressed herein are the author's and do not necessarily represent the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond or the Federal Reserve System. 1 For example, one might imagine a large ®nancial supermarket offering commercial bank- ing, investment banking, and insurance services, together with some non®nancial services, such as manufacturing. 2 Discussions of such proposals can be found in Greenspan (1997), Helfer (1997), Kwast and Passmore (1997), Ludwig (1997), and Whalen (1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Plistorioeil Revie^Kr
    Plistorioeil Revie^Kr The State Historical Society of Missouri COLUMBIA, MISSOURI BOARD OF EDITORS LAWRENCE 0. CHRISTENSEN SUSAN M. HARTMANN University of Missouri-Rolla Ohio State University, Columbus WILLIAM E. FOLEY ALAN R. HAVIG Central Missouri State University, Stephens College, Warrensburg Columbia JEAN TYREE HAMILTON DAVID D. MARCH Marshall Kirksville ARVARH E. STRICKLAND University of Missouri-Columbia COVER DESCRIPTION: This 1943 oil painting, Simi Valley, California (\5lA" x 23"), by Fred Shane is a recent gift to the State Historical Society from Harry and Ann Cohen of Columbia. Shane (1906- 1990), a noted artist and educator, taught art at the University of Missouri-Columbia for thirty- seven years. Most major museums in the nation have exhibited his work. The painting is a welcome addition to the Society's holdings of Shane paint­ ings and drawings and will be displayed periodical­ ly in the Art Gallery. Gallery hours are 8:30 A.M. to 4:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. MISSOURI HISTORICAL REVIEW Published Quarterly by THE STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF MISSOURI COLUMBIA, MISSOURI JAMES W. GOODRICH EDITOR LYNN WOLF GENTZLER ASSOCIATE EDITOR LEONA S. MORRIS RESEARCH ASSISTANT Copyright © 1992 by the State Historical Society of Missouri 1020 Lowry Street, Columbia, Missouri 65201 The Missouri Historical Review (ISSN 0026-6582) is owned by The State Historical Society of Missouri and is published quarterly at 10 South Hitt, Columbia, Missouri 65201. Send communications, business and editorial correspondence and change of address to the State Historical Society of Missouri, 1020 Lowry Street, Columbia, MO 65201. Second class postage is paid at Columbia, Missouri.
    [Show full text]
  • Marriner S. Eccles and the 1951 Treasury – Federal Reserve Accord: Lessons for Central Bank Independence
    Working Paper No. 747 Marriner S. Eccles and the 1951 Treasury – Federal Reserve Accord: Lessons for Central Bank Independence by Thorvald Grung Moe* Levy Economics Institute of Bard College January 2013 * Thorvald Grung Moe is a senior adviser at Norges Bank, the central bank of Norway, and a research associate at the Levy Economics Institute. The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the position of Norges Bank. The Levy Economics Institute Working Paper Collection presents research in progress by Levy Institute scholars and conference participants. The purpose of the series is to disseminate ideas to and elicit comments from academics and professionals. Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, founded in 1986, is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, independently funded research organization devoted to public service. Through scholarship and economic research it generates viable, effective public policy responses to important economic problems that profoundly affect the quality of life in the United States and abroad. Levy Economics Institute P.O. Box 5000 Annandale-on-Hudson, NY 12504-5000 http://www.levyinstitute.org Copyright © Levy Economics Institute 2013 All rights reserved ISSN 1547-366X ABSTRACT The 1951 Treasury – Federal Reserve Accord is an important milestone in central bank history. It led to a lasting separation between monetary policy and the Treasury’s debt-management powers, and established an independent central bank focused on price stability and macroeconomic stability. This paper revisits the history of the Accord and elaborates on the role played by Marriner Eccles in the events that led up to its signing. As chairman of the Fed Board of Governors since 1934, Eccles was also instrumental in drafting key banking legislation that enabled the Federal Reserve System to take on a more independent role after the Accord.
    [Show full text]
  • The Treasury-Fed Accord: a New Narrative Account
    The Treasury-Fed Accord: A New Narrative Account Robert L. Hetzel and Ralph F. Leach he fiftieth anniversary of Federal Reserve Independence Day was March 4, 2001. After World War II ended, the Fed continued its T wartime pegging of interest rates. The Treasury-Fed Accord, an- nounced March 4, 1951, freed the Fed from that obligation. Below, we chron- icle the dramatic confrontation between the Fed and the White House that ended with the Accord.1 1. THE CHALLENGE TO THE TREASURY In April 1942, after the entry of the United States into World War II, the Fed publicly committed itself to maintaining an interest rate of 3/8 percent on Treasury bills. In practice, it also established an upper limit to the term structure of interest rates on government debt. The ceiling for long-term government bonds was 2 1/2 percent. In summer 1947, the Fed raised the peg on the Treasury bill rate.2 However, the Treasury adamantly insisted that the Robert L. Hetzel is Economist and Vice President at the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. From 1971 through 1977, Ralph F. Leach was Chairman of the Executive Committee of J. P. Morgan and Morgan Guaranty Trust. Before joining the Guaranty Trust Company in 1953, he was Chief of the Government Finance Section at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. This article contains his reminiscences about the Treasury–Federal Reserve Accord. The authors gratefully acknowledge conversations with C. Richard Youngdahl and Donald B. Riefler and thank Marvin Goodfriend, Tom Humphrey, Jeff Lacker, and Anna Schwartz for many useful suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdfin Late August
    Library of Congress image det 4a32167, photo by William Henry Jackson (circa 1892). In �ate �ugust The Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City’s Jackson Hole Economic Policy Symposium In �ate �ugust The Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City’s Jackson Hole Economic Policy Symposium Published by the Public Affairs Department of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City 1 Memorial Drive • Kansas City, MO 64198 Diane M. Raley, publisher Craig S. Hakkio, content advisor Kristina J. Young, associate publisher Lowell C. Jones, executive editor Tim Todd, co-author Bill Medley, co-author Casey McKinley, designer Cindy Edwards, archivist All rights reserved, Copyright © 2013 Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior consent of the publisher. First Edition, 2011 First Edition, Second Printing 2013 In Late August • III �ontents vii Introduction 1 ‘Monetary Policy Issues in the 1980s’ August 1982 • Grand Teton National Park, Wyo. 9 ‘World Agricultural Trade: The Potential for Growth’ May 1978 • Kansas City, Mo. 15 ‘Modeling Agriculture for Policy Analysis in the 1980s’ September 1981 • Vail, Colo. 23 ‘Price Stability and Public Policy’ August 1984 • Grand Teton National Park, Wyo. 29 ‘Central Banking Issues in Emerging Market-Oriented Economies’ August 1990 • Grand Teton National Park, Wyo. 37 ‘Maintaining Financial Stability in a Global Economy’ August 1997 • Grand Teton National Park, Wyo. 43 ‘The Greenspan Era: Lessons for the Future’ August 2005 • Grand Teton National Park, Wyo. 51 Afterword 57 Appendix 60 Images from the Jackson Hole Symposium 62 Jackson Hole Economic Symposium Team 63 Bibliography 66 Photo Credits 68 Index Contents • V 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions Collection
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf3s2006vg Online items available Guide to the Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions Collection Processing Information: Arrangement and description by Deborah Kennedy, David C. Tambo, Yolanda Blue, Louisa Dennis, and Elizabeth Witherell; also student assistants Elizabeth Aburto, Julie Baron, Marisela Bautista, Liz Bittner, Michelle Bowden, Chris Caldow, Jacqueline Chau, Alison Church, Hubert Dubrulle, Sivakumar Elambooranan, Richard Frausto, Michael Fry, Joseline Garde, Joseph Gardner, Tim Hagen, Arlene Hebron, Kara Heerman, M. Pilar Herraiz, Ain Hunter, Sandra Jacobs, Derek Jaeger, Gisele Jones, Julie Kravets, Annie Leatt, Kurt Morrill, Chris Shea, Robert Simons, Kay Wamser, Leon Zimlich, and other Library and Special Collections staff and student assistants; machine-readable finding aid created by Xiuzhi Zhou. Latest revision D. Tambo. Department of Special Collections Davidson Library University of California, Santa Barbara Santa Barbara, CA 93106 Phone: (805) 893-3062 Fax: (805) 893-5749 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.library.ucsb.edu/speccoll/speccoll.html © 2000 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Guide to the Center for the Study Mss 18 1 of Democratic Institutions Collection Guide to the Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions (CSDI) Collection, 1950-1991 [bulk dates 1961-1987] Collection number: Mss 18 Department of Special Collections Davidson Library University of California, Santa Barbara Contact Information: Department of Special Collections Davidson Library University of California, Santa Barbara Santa Barbara, CA 93106 Phone: (805) 893-3062 Fax: (805) 893-5749 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.library.ucsb.edu/speccoll/speccoll.html Processing Information: Arrangement and description by Deborah Kennedy, David C.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining Alternative Macroeconomic Theories
    BRUCE C. GREENWALD Bell Communications Research JOSEPH E. STIGLITZ Princeton University Examining Alternative MacroeconomicTheories THE PAST TWO DECADES have witnessed intense competition among theories attemptingto explain macroeconomic behavior. Alternative theories have made claims with respect both to the purity of their methodology and to their ability to explain the "facts." This paper reviews the ability of three of the major competitors-new classical, traditionalKeynesian, and what we call new Keynesian theories-to explain what we take to be the most important stylized facts. Our perspective is unabashedly biased: we believe that new Keynesian theories-particularly those focusing on the consequences of imperfec- tions in the capital, goods, and labormarkets arising from imperfect and costly information-provide the best availableexplanation.' Some Words on Methodology Because our objective is to persuade the reader why these new Keynesiantheories shouldbe taken seriously, and because methodolog- ical issues have been frequentlyraised in discussions of theory assess- ment in recent years, we commentbriefly on these issues. We do not provide here an econometric test of a well-articulated Thanksare due for helpfulcomments to membersof the BrookingsPanel. 1. By "imperfections,"we mean deviationsin these marketsfrom that characteristic standard,neoclassical markets with perfectcompetition and perfectinformation. 207 208 Br-ookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1:1988 version of our model and contrast it with a version of the alternative theories. Eventually, we hope, such a test will be conducted. But tests of relativitytheory were not basedon a statisticalcomparison of goodness of fit between the Newtonian and relativity views of the world. A far more powerful test-and one that was actually used-was to find circumstances in which the two theories yielded markedly different predictionsand to see which did betteron these crucialtests.
    [Show full text]
  • The 70Th Anniversary of the Council of Economic Advisers
    ECONOMIC REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT PRERELEASE OF CHAPTER 7: THE 70TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE COUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISERS February 2016 CHAPTER 7 THE 70TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE COUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISERS lmost exactly 70 years ago, on February 20, 1946, President Harry ATruman signed the Employment Act of 1946 into law. Born out of America’s experience during the Great Depression, this law reflected Congress’s desire to prevent an economic calamity of that scale from ever recurring. Yet the immediate practical consequences of the Employment Act were modest: it created two institutions, the Joint Economic Committee on the Economic Report—subsequently renamed the Joint Economic Committee (JEC)—and the Council of Economic Advisers (CEA). Together with the JEC, it was hoped that CEA would help to “defend the ramparts against depression” (Flash 1965). CEA is in many ways a distinctive institution, both within the admin- istration and in the international context. The CEA chair reports directly to the President on economic issues, but CEA has no regulatory authority and few prescribed operational responsibilities. For most of its history, CEA has had a small staff drawn mostly from the academic economics community and hired on the basis of professional expertise. The views it expresses are grounded in economic analysis, and are based on applying economic theory and empirical research to the often-novel situations in which policymakers find themselves. However, CEA is also a part of the Executive Office of the President, working collaboratively with other departments within the Executive Office of the President and the administration more broadly to advance the President’s agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • 69, 7 October 2014 Special Issue on Piketty’S Capital
    sanity, humanity and science probably the world’s most read economics journal real-world economics review - Subscribers: 24,719 Subscribe here Blog ISSN 1755-9472 - A journal of the World Economics Association (WEA) 13,599 members, join here - Sister open-access journals: Economic Thought and World Economic Review - back issues at www.paecon.net recent issues: 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 Issue no. 69, 7 October 2014 Special issue on Piketty’s Capital The Piketty phenomenon and the future of inequality 2 Robert Wade Egalitarianism’s latest foe 18 Yanis Varoufakis Piketty and the limits of marginal productivity theory 36 Lars Syll Piketty’s determinism? 44 Ann Pettifor and Geoff Tily Piketty’s global tax on capital 51 Heikki Patomäki Reading Piketty in Athens 58 Richard Parker Pondering Mexican hurdles while reading Capital in the XXI Century 74 Alicia Puyana Mutis Piketty’s inequality and local versus global Lewis turning points 89 Richard Koo The growth of capital 100 Merijn Knibbe Piketty vs. the classical economic reformers 122 Michael Hudson Is Capital in the Twenty-first century Das Kapital for the twenty-first century? 131 Claude Hillinger Piketty and the resurgence of patrimonial capitalism 138 Jayati Ghosh Unpacking the first fundamental law 145 James K. Galbraith Capital and capital: The second most fundamental confusion 149 Edward Fullbrook Piketty’s policy proposals: How to effectively redistribute income 161 David Colander Piketty: Inequality, poverty and managerial capitalism 167 Victor. A. Beker Capital in the Twenty-First Century: Are we doomed without a wealth tax? 175 Dean Baker Board of Editors, past contributors, submissions and etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertation Final Draft
    UNITVERISTY OF CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara The Price of Prosperity: Inflation and the Limits of the New Deal Order A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History by Samir Sonti Committee in charge: Professor Nelson Lichtenstein, Chair Professor Mary O. Furner Professor Alice O’Connor Professor Salim Yaqub Professor Kate McDonald March 2017 The dissertation of Samir Sonti is approved. __________________________________________ Kate McDonald __________________________________________ Salim Yaqub __________________________________________ Alice O’Connor __________________________________________ Mary Furner __________________________________________ Nelson Lichtenstein, Committee Chair September 2016 The Price of Prosperity: Inflation and the Limits of the New Deal Order Copyright © 2017 by Samir Sonti iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Dedicated to Jayashree Sonti and Nagesh Sonti Writing a dissertation is at once a solitary and a collective process. Although only my name appears on the title page, and in spite of the countless hours I spent alone while producing draft after draft, I could not have accomplished this on my own. For one, this project would not have been possible without the generous support I received from a number of institutions: The Washington Center for Equitable Growth; the Dirksen Center; the UC Group in Economic History Research; UCSB History Associates; and the UCSB Center for the Study of Work, Labor, and Democracy all provided grants and fellowships that enabled me to travel to archives and complete the research on which this project is based. And the staff at those archives – too many to name all – deserve special recognition. Historians depend upon archives, and archives depend upon archivists. They are the unsung heroes without whom there would be no hope of recovering the past.
    [Show full text]