Three-Dimensional Virtual Histology of Early Vertebrate Scales Revealed by Synchrotron X-Ray Phase-Contrast Microtomography
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Table S1.Xlsx
Bone type Bone type Taxonomy Order/series Family Valid binomial Outdated binomial Notes Reference(s) (skeletal bone) (scales) Actinopterygii Incertae sedis Incertae sedis Incertae sedis †Birgeria stensioei cellular this study †Birgeria groenlandica cellular Ørvig, 1978 †Eurynotus crenatus cellular Goodrich, 1907; Schultze, 2016 †Mimipiscis toombsi †Mimia toombsi cellular Richter & Smith, 1995 †Moythomasia sp. cellular cellular Sire et al., 2009; Schultze, 2016 †Cheirolepidiformes †Cheirolepididae †Cheirolepis canadensis cellular cellular Goodrich, 1907; Sire et al., 2009; Zylberberg et al., 2016; Meunier et al. 2018a; this study Cladistia Polypteriformes Polypteridae †Bawitius sp. cellular Meunier et al., 2016 †Dajetella sudamericana cellular cellular Gayet & Meunier, 1992 Erpetoichthys calabaricus Calamoichthys sp. cellular Moss, 1961a; this study †Pollia suarezi cellular cellular Meunier & Gayet, 1996 Polypterus bichir cellular cellular Kölliker, 1859; Stéphan, 1900; Goodrich, 1907; Ørvig, 1978 Polypterus delhezi cellular this study Polypterus ornatipinnis cellular Totland et al., 2011 Polypterus senegalus cellular Sire et al., 2009 Polypterus sp. cellular Moss, 1961a †Scanilepis sp. cellular Sire et al., 2009 †Scanilepis dubia cellular cellular Ørvig, 1978 †Saurichthyiformes †Saurichthyidae †Saurichthys sp. cellular Scheyer et al., 2014 Chondrostei †Chondrosteiformes †Chondrosteidae †Chondrosteus acipenseroides cellular this study Acipenseriformes Acipenseridae Acipenser baerii cellular Leprévost et al., 2017 Acipenser gueldenstaedtii -
Constraints on the Timescale of Animal Evolutionary History
Palaeontologia Electronica palaeo-electronica.org Constraints on the timescale of animal evolutionary history Michael J. Benton, Philip C.J. Donoghue, Robert J. Asher, Matt Friedman, Thomas J. Near, and Jakob Vinther ABSTRACT Dating the tree of life is a core endeavor in evolutionary biology. Rates of evolution are fundamental to nearly every evolutionary model and process. Rates need dates. There is much debate on the most appropriate and reasonable ways in which to date the tree of life, and recent work has highlighted some confusions and complexities that can be avoided. Whether phylogenetic trees are dated after they have been estab- lished, or as part of the process of tree finding, practitioners need to know which cali- brations to use. We emphasize the importance of identifying crown (not stem) fossils, levels of confidence in their attribution to the crown, current chronostratigraphic preci- sion, the primacy of the host geological formation and asymmetric confidence intervals. Here we present calibrations for 88 key nodes across the phylogeny of animals, rang- ing from the root of Metazoa to the last common ancestor of Homo sapiens. Close attention to detail is constantly required: for example, the classic bird-mammal date (base of crown Amniota) has often been given as 310-315 Ma; the 2014 international time scale indicates a minimum age of 318 Ma. Michael J. Benton. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. [email protected] Philip C.J. Donoghue. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. [email protected] Robert J. -
1 Evolutionary Time Best Explains the Global Distribution of Living
Evolutionary time best explains the global distribution of living freshwater fish diversity SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Included in this document: Supplementary text: 1. Extended Methods 2. Extended Results 1: Comparing colonization time estimates between two phylogenies, one with fossil taxa 3. Extended Results 2: Effect of excluding early diverging lineages on diversification rate and colonization time estimates of basins Supplementary tables: 1. Table S1: Constraints on dispersal used in stratified DEC model 2. Table S2: Change in richness, diversification rates, time-for-speciation and surface area with latitude and longitude 3. Table S3: Effect of time-for-speciation and diversification rates on species richness 4. Table S4: Effect of time-for-speciation and diversification rates on species richness while controlling for the species-area scaling 5. Table S5: Relationship between diversification rates and colonization times 6. Table S6: Influence of area on trends in diversification rates and time-for-speciation 7. Table S7: Regions assigned to fossil taxa with references Supplementary figures: 8. Figure S1: The relationship between basin surface area and richness 9. Figure S2: Method to illustrate complex colonization-richness temporal dynamics 10. Figure S3: Comparing colonization time estimates between alternative phylogenies References Included in FigShare repository (doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.8251394): 1. Table A1: Presence Absence Matrix (PAM) summarizing the distribution of 14,947 species across 3,119 basins 2. Table A2: Basin-specific mean rates of diversification based on BAMM and DR 3. Table A3: Species-specific mean colonization times derived from ancestral area reconstruction analyses. 4. Table A4: Basin-specific mean and median colonization times 5. -
Lineage Imply Later Origin of Modern Ray-Finned Fishes Giles, Sam; Near, Tom; Xu, Guang-Hui; Friedman, Matt
University of Birmingham Early members of ‘living fossil’ lineage imply later origin of modern ray-finned fishes Giles, Sam; Near, Tom; Xu, Guang-Hui; Friedman, Matt DOI: 10.1038/nature23654 License: Other (please specify with Rights Statement) Document Version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (Harvard): Giles, S, Near, T, Xu, G-H & Friedman, M 2017, 'Early members of ‘living fossil’ lineage imply later origin of modern ray-finned fishes', Nature, vol. 549, no. 7671, pp. 265–268. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23654 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: Checked for eligibility: 23/10/2018 This is the accepted manuscript of a paper published in its final form in Nature which can be found at: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23654 General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document. -
Fotw Classification Detailed Version
1 Classification of fishes from Fishes of the World 5th Edition. Nelson, JS, Grande, TC, and Wilson, MVH. 2016. This is a more detailed version of the listing in the book’s Table of Contents. Order and Family numbers are in parentheses; the page number follows a comma; † indicates extinct taxon. If you spot errors, please let us know at [email protected]. Latest update January 11, 2018. PHYLUM CHORDATA, 13 SUBPHYLUM UROCHORDATA—tunicates, 15 Class ASCIDIACEA—ascidians, 15 Class THALIACEA—salps, 15 Order PYROSOMIDA, 15 Order DOLIOLIDA, 15 Order SALPIDA, 15 Class APPENDICULARIA, 15 SUBPHYLUM CEPHALOCHORDATA, 16 Order AMPHIOXIFORMES—lancelets, 16 Family BRANCHIOSTOMATIDAE, 16 Family EPIGONICHTHYIDAE, 16 †SUBPHYLUM CONODONTOPHORIDA—conodonts, 17 †Class CONODONTA, 17 SUBPHYLUM CRANIATA, 18 INFRAPHYLUM MYXINOMORPHI, 19 Class MYXINI, 20 Order MYXINIFORMES (1)—hagfishes, 20 Family MYXINIDAE (1)—hagfishes, 20 Subfamily Rubicundinae, 21 Subfamily Eptatretinae, 21 Subfamily Myxininae, 21 INFRAPHYLUM VERTEBRATA—vertebrates, 22 †Anatolepis, 22 Superclass PETROMYZONTOMORPHI, 23 Class PETROMYZONTIDA, 23 Order PETROMYZONTIFORMES (2)—lampreys, 23 †Family MAYOMYZONTIDAE, 24 Family PETROMYZONTIDAE (2)—northern lampreys, 24 Subfamily Petromyzontinae, 24 Subfamily Lampetrinae, 25 Family GEOTRIIDAE (3)—southern lampreys, 25 Family MORDACIIDAE (4)—southern topeyed lampreys, 26 †Superclass PTERASPIDOMORPHI, 26 †Class PTERASPIDOMORPHA, 26 Subclass ASTRASPIDA, 27 †Order ASTRASPIDIFORMES, 27 Subclass ARANDASPIDA, 27 †Order ARANDASPIDIFORMES, -
Early Gnathostome Phylogeny Revisited: Multiple Method Consensus
RESEARCH ARTICLE Early Gnathostome Phylogeny Revisited: Multiple Method Consensus Tuo Qiao1, Benedict King2, John A. Long2, Per E. Ahlberg3, Min Zhu1* 1 Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, 2 School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 3 Department of Organismal Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, NorbyvaÈgen, Uppsala, Sweden * [email protected] a11111 Abstract A series of recent studies recovered consistent phylogenetic scenarios of jawed verte- brates, such as the paraphyly of placoderms with respect to crown gnathostomes, and anti- archs as the sister group of all other jawed vertebrates. However, some of the phylogenetic OPEN ACCESS relationships within the group have remained controversial, such as the positions of Ente- Citation: Qiao T, King B, Long JA, Ahlberg PE, Zhu lognathus, ptyctodontids, and the Guiyu-lineage that comprises Guiyu, Psarolepis and M (2016) Early Gnathostome Phylogeny Revisited: Achoania. The revision of the dataset in a recent study reveals a modified phylogenetic Multiple Method Consensus. PLoS ONE 11(9): hypothesis, which shows that some of these phylogenetic conflicts were sourced from a e0163157. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0163157 few inadvertent miscodings. The interrelationships of early gnathostomes are addressed Editor: Hector Escriva, Laboratoire Arago, FRANCE based on a combined new dataset with 103 taxa and 335 characters, which is the most Received: May 2, 2016 comprehensive morphological dataset constructed to date. This dataset is investigated in a Accepted: September 2, 2016 phylogenetic context using maximum parsimony (MP), Bayesian inference (BI) and maxi- Published: September 20, 2016 mum likelihood (ML) approaches in an attempt to explore the consensus and incongruence between the hypotheses of early gnathostome interrelationships recovered from different Copyright: 2016 Qiao et al. -
Morphology and Histology of Acanthodian Fin Spines from the Late Silurian Ramsasa E Locality, Skane, Sweden Anna Jerve, Oskar Bremer, Sophie Sanchez, Per E
Morphology and histology of acanthodian fin spines from the late Silurian Ramsasa E locality, Skane, Sweden Anna Jerve, Oskar Bremer, Sophie Sanchez, Per E. Ahlberg To cite this version: Anna Jerve, Oskar Bremer, Sophie Sanchez, Per E. Ahlberg. Morphology and histology of acanthodian fin spines from the late Silurian Ramsasa E locality, Skane, Sweden. Palaeontologia Electronica, Coquina Press, 2017, 20 (3), pp.20.3.56A-1-20.3.56A-19. 10.26879/749. hal-02976007 HAL Id: hal-02976007 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02976007 Submitted on 23 Oct 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Palaeontologia Electronica palaeo-electronica.org Morphology and histology of acanthodian fin spines from the late Silurian Ramsåsa E locality, Skåne, Sweden Anna Jerve, Oskar Bremer, Sophie Sanchez, and Per E. Ahlberg ABSTRACT Comparisons of acanthodians to extant gnathostomes are often hampered by the paucity of mineralized structures in their endoskeleton, which limits the potential pres- ervation of phylogenetically informative traits. Fin spines, mineralized dermal struc- tures that sit anterior to fins, are found on both stem- and crown-group gnathostomes, and represent an additional potential source of comparative data for studying acantho- dian relationships with the other groups of early gnathostomes. -
Family-Group Names of Fossil Fishes
European Journal of Taxonomy 466: 1–167 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2018.466 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2018 · Van der Laan R. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1F74D019-D13C-426F-835A-24A9A1126C55 Family-group names of fossil fishes Richard VAN DER LAAN Grasmeent 80, 1357JJ Almere, The Netherlands. Email: [email protected] urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:55EA63EE-63FD-49E6-A216-A6D2BEB91B82 Abstract. The family-group names of animals (superfamily, family, subfamily, supertribe, tribe and subtribe) are regulated by the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Particularly, the family names are very important, because they are among the most widely used of all technical animal names. A uniform name and spelling are essential for the location of information. To facilitate this, a list of family- group names for fossil fishes has been compiled. I use the concept ‘Fishes’ in the usual sense, i.e., starting with the Agnatha up to the †Osteolepidiformes. All the family-group names proposed for fossil fishes found to date are listed, together with their author(s) and year of publication. The main goal of the list is to contribute to the usage of the correct family-group names for fossil fishes with a uniform spelling and to list the author(s) and date of those names. No valid family-group name description could be located for the following family-group names currently in usage: †Brindabellaspidae, †Diabolepididae, †Dorsetichthyidae, †Erichalcidae, †Holodipteridae, †Kentuckiidae, †Lepidaspididae, †Loganelliidae and †Pituriaspididae. Keywords. Nomenclature, ICZN, Vertebrata, Agnatha, Gnathostomata. -
Scale Morphology and Squamation Pattern of Guiyu Oneiros Provide
www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Scale morphology and squamation pattern of Guiyu oneiros provide new insights into Received: 8 June 2018 Accepted: 7 January 2019 early osteichthyan body plan Published: xx xx xxxx Xindong Cui1,2,3, Tuo Qiao1,2 & Min Zhu1,2,3 Scale morphology and squamation play an important role in the study of fsh phylogeny and classifcation. However, as the scales of the earliest osteichthyans or bony fshes are usually found in a disarticulated state, research into squamation patterns and phylogeny has been limited. Here we quantitatively describe the scale morphology of the oldest articulated osteichthyan, the 425-million- year-old Guiyu oneiros, based on geometric morphometrics and high-resolution computed tomography. Based on the cluster analysis of the scales in the articulated specimens, we present a squamation pattern of Guiyu oneiros, which divides the body scales into 4 main belts, comprising 16 areas. The new pattern reveals that the squamation of early osteichthyans is more complicated than previously known, and demonstrates that the taxa near the crown osteichthyan node in late Silurian had a greater degree of squamation zonation compared to more advanced forms. This study ofers an important reference for the classifcation of detached scales of early osteichthyans, provides new insights into the early evolution of osteichthyan scales, and adds to our understanding of the early osteichthyan body plan. Research of the scale morphology and squamation of both fossil1–7 and extant osteichthyans8–14 provides valuable information for the fsh systematics and phylogeny. Previous descriptive works on early osteichthyan scale-based taxa were based on qualitative descriptions, or simple quantitative descriptions, lacking any systematic morpho- metric data2,15–20. -
The Developmental Relationship Between Teeth and Dermal
RESEARCH ARTICLE The developmental relationship between teeth and dermal odontodes in the most primitive bony fish Lophosteus Donglei Chen1*, Henning Blom1, Sophie Sanchez1,2,3, Paul Tafforeau3, Tiiu Ma¨ rss4, Per E Ahlberg1* 1Department of Organismal Biology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; 2SciLifeLab, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; 3European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France; 4Estonian Marine Institute, University of Tartu, Tallinn, Estonia Abstract The ontogenetic trajectory of a marginal jawbone of Lophosteus superbus (Late Silurian, 422 Million years old), the phylogenetically most basal stem osteichthyan, visualized by synchrotron microtomography, reveals a developmental relationship between teeth and dermal odontodes that is not evident from the adult morphology. The earliest odontodes are two longitudinal founder ridges formed at the ossification center. Subsequent odontodes that are added lingually to the ridges turn into conical teeth and undergo cyclic replacement, while those added labially achieve a stellate appearance. Stellate odontodes deposited directly on the bony plate are aligned with the alternate files of teeth, whereas new tooth positions are inserted into the files of sequential addition when a gap appears. Successive teeth and overgrowing odontodes show hybrid morphologies around the oral-dermal boundary, suggesting signal cross- communication. We propose that teeth and dermal odontodes are modifications of a single system, regulated and differentiated by the oral and dermal epithelia. *For correspondence: [email protected] (DC); [email protected] (PEA) Introduction A tooth is a particular type of ‘odontode’ (Figure 1A): an exoskeletal structure that forms at an inter- Competing interests: The face between an epithelial fold and the underlying mesenchyme, by dentine growing inwards from authors declare that no the epithelial contact surface. -
Late Jurassic Jaw Bones of Halecomorph Fish (Actinopterygii: Halecomorphi) Studied with X-Ray Microcomputed Tomography
Palaeontologia Electronica palaeo-electronica.org Late Jurassic jaw bones of Halecomorph fish (Actinopterygii: Halecomorphi) studied with X-ray microcomputed tomography Błażej Błażejowski, Paul Lambers, Piotr Gieszcz, Daniel Tyborowski, and Marcin Binkowski ABSTRACT New finds of Halecomorphi fish remains from Late Jurassic limestones of Owadów-Brzezinki (Poland) are investigated using X-ray microcomputed tomography (XMT) revealing details of jaw bones for actinopterygian fish histology. Three-dimen- sional (3-D) reconstruction allows for correct taxonomical verification. The possibility of 3-D printing gives the opportunity for work with a model in any desired scale without risk of damaging the specimen. Błażej Błażejowski. Institute of Paleobiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Twarda 51/55, 00-818 Warszawa, Poland. [email protected] Paul Lambers. Universiteitsmuseum Utrecht, Lange Nieuwstraat 106, 3512 PN Utrecht, The Netherlands, [email protected] Piotr Gieszcz. Independent Center for Advanced Research machinic.it, Stawki 4c/10, 00-193 Warszawa, Poland, [email protected] Daniel Tyborowski. Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wilcza 64, 00-679 Warszawa, Poland, [email protected] Marcin Binkowski. Department of Computer Science and Materials Science, University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland, [email protected] Keywords: Halecomorph fish; Late Jurassic; X-ray microcomputed tomography (XMT) Submission: 14 October 2014. Acceptance: 21 October 2015 INTRODUCTION sils of latest Jurassic (Late Tithonian) terrestrial and marine organisms (including also remains of This paper presents the recently discovered pterosaurs, ammonites, horseshoe crabs, decapod jaw bones of halecomorph fish studied with X-ray crustaceans and insects) were discovered (Błaże- microcomputed tomography. The bones came from jowski, 2015; Kin and Błażejowski, 2012, 2014; new paleontological site of the Sławno limestones Błażejowski et al., 2015). -
The Largest Silurian Vertebrate and Its Palaeoecological Implications
OPEN The largest Silurian vertebrate and its SUBJECT AREAS: palaeoecological implications PALAEONTOLOGY Brian Choo1,2, Min Zhu1, Wenjin Zhao1, Liaotao Jia1 & You’an Zhu1 PALAEOCLIMATE 1Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology 2 Received and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, PO Box 643, Beijing 100044, China, School of Biological Sciences, 10 January 2014 Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide 5001, South Australia. Accepted 23 May 2014 An apparent absence of Silurian fishes more than half-a-metre in length has been viewed as evidence that gnathostomes were restricted in size and diversity prior to the Devonian. Here we describe the largest Published pre-Devonian vertebrate (Megamastax amblyodus gen. et sp. nov.), a predatory marine osteichthyan from 12 June 2014 the Silurian Kuanti Formation (late Ludlow, ,423 million years ago) of Yunnan, China, with an estimated length of about 1 meter. The unusual dentition of the new form suggests a durophagous diet which, combined with its large size, indicates a considerable degree of trophic specialisation among early osteichthyans. The lack of large Silurian vertebrates has recently been used as constraint in Correspondence and palaeoatmospheric modelling, with purported lower oxygen levels imposing a physiological size limit. requests for materials Regardless of the exact causal relationship between oxygen availability and evolutionary success, this finding should be addressed to refutes the assumption that pre-Emsian vertebrates were restricted to small body sizes. M.Z. (zhumin@ivpp. ac.cn) he Devonian Period has been considered to mark a major transition in the size and diversity of early gnathostomes (jawed vertebrates), including the earliest appearance of large vertebrate predators1.