Ticf Kkddv KERALA GAZETTE B[Nimcniambn {]Kn≤S∏Spøp∂Xv PUBLISHED by AUTHORITY

2015 tabv 5 Xncph\¥]pcw, 5th May 2015 hmeyw 4 \º¿ sNmΔ 1190 taSw 21 21st Medam 1190 18 Vol. IV } Thiruvananthapuram, No. } 1937 sshimJw 15 Tuesday 15th Vaisakha 1937 PART I Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

Labour and Skills Department ANNEXURE Labour and Skills (A) Whether wage fixed to factory workers of Mangalam ORDERS News Paper Daily in respect of recommendation of Majidiya Wage Board by the management is (1) correct or not ? If not correct what is the G.O. (Rt.) No. 318/2015/LBR. remedy the workers are entitled to ? What will Thiruvananthapuram, 16th March 2015. be the eligible amount to each worker, as per the Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an correct wage fixation ? industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director, Mangalam Publications India (Private) Limited, (2) S. H. Mount P. O., Kottayam-686 006 and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the G.O. (Rt.) No. 319/2015/LBR. President, Mangalam Employees Union (TUCI), Kaumudi Thiruvananthapuram, 16th March 2015. Building, T. B. Road, Kottayam-686 001 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ; Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is industrial dispute exists between (1) Smt. Bini Saju, necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for w/o Saju, Neduveli Puthenpurakkal House, Muttithadi adjudication; P. O., Thrissur-680 317 (2) Sri C. R. Shaju, Choondayil Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred House, Ollur, Pallinada, Thrissur-680 306 and the workmen by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of of the above referred establishment (1) 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for Sri N. R. Haridas, Nellanattu House, Kallur P. O., adjudication to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Pin-680 302 (2) Sri K. O. Binoy, Kalathinkal House, Court will pass the award within a period of three months. Ponnukkara P. O., Bharatha, Thrissur-680 306 represented

7 76 KERALA GAZETTE [PART I by Sri K. V. Haridas, General Secretary Trichur District (4) Road Transport Employees Union (CITU) Machingal Lane, G.O. (Rt.) No. 321/2015/LBR. Cylon Lodging, Thrissur-680 001 in respect of matters Thiruvananthapuram, 16th March 2015. mentioned in the annexure to this order ; Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is industrial dispute exists between The Manager, Mary necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for Matha ICSE School, Pudukad P. O., Thrissur-680 301 and adjudication; the workman of the above referred establishment Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred Smt. Jessy, w/o Joshi Antony, Thekkumpuram Veedu, Pudukad P. O., Thrissur–680 301 in respect of matters by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of mentioned in the annexure to this order ; 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The adjudication; Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months. Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of ANNEXURE 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for Whether the denial of employment to adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Sri N. R. Haridas, Driver and Sri K. O. Binoy, Industrial Tribunal, will pass the award within a period of Conductor by the bus owners Smt. Bini Saju three months. and Sri C. R. Shaju is justifiable ? If not, what ANNEXURE relief they are entitled to get ? Whether the denial of employment to (3) Smt. Jessy, Ayah, by the management of Mary Matha ICSE School is justifiable ? If not G.O. (Rt.) No. 320/2015/LBR. what relief she is entitled to get ? Thiruvananthapuram, 16th March 2015. (5) Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an G.O. (Rt.) No. 322/2015/LBR. industrial dispute exists between Sri I. R. Vijayan, Thiruvananthapuram, 16th March 2015. President, P. D. D. P. Society, Kalariparambu, Mathilakam Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an P. O., Pin-680 685 and the workman of the above referred industrial dispute exists between Sri P. K. Ayoob, establishment Smt. K.V. Sreedevi, w/o Sajeevan, Adiparambil, Proprietor, Damas Wedding Silks, Civic Centre, Main Road, Kalariparambu, Mathilakam P. O., Pin-680 685 in respect Chavakkad, Thrissur-680 506 and the workman of the of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ; above referred establishment Smt. K. N. Bindhu w/o And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is Preman, Ponmalan Veedu, Blangad P. O., Chavakkad, Thrissur-680 506 in respect of matters mentioned in the necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for annexure to this order ; adjudication; And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of adjudication; 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The three months. Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months. ANNEXURE . ANNEXURE Whether the denial of employment to Whether the denial of employment to Smt. K. V. Sreedevi, Helper by the management Smt. K. N. Bindhu, Sales girl, by the management of P. D. D. P. Society, Mathilakam is justifiable ? of M/s Damas Wedding Silks is justifiable ? If not what relief she is entitled to get ? If not what relief she is entitled to get ?

8 5th MAY 2015] KERALA GAZETTE 77

(6) (8)

G.O. (Rt.) No. 323/2015/LBR. G.O. (Rt.) No. 329/2015/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 16th March 2015. Thiruvananthapuram, 16th March 2015. Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Mary industrial dispute exists between the General Manager, Matha ICSE School, Pudukad P. O., Thrissur-680 301 B.C. Cheruvally Estate, P. B. No. 2, Erumeli P. O., and the workman of the above referred establishment Kottayam-686 509 and the workman of the above referred Smt. K. M. Priya, Kanjirathinkal Veedu, Palazhi, Pudukad, establishment Sri Joseph Antony, Charangattu Veedu, Thrissur-680 301 in respect of matters mentioned in the Kanakappalam P. O., Cheruvally Estate, Erumeli, Kottayam annexure to this order ; in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ; And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is adjudication; necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication; Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peermade). three months. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a ANNEXURE period of three months. Whether the denial of employment to ANNEXURE Smt. K. M. Priya, Ayah, by the management of Whether the denial of employment to Mary Matha ICSE School is justifiable ? If not Sri Joseph Antony, Worker, by the management what relief she is entitled to get ? of B. C. Cheruvally Estate, P. B. No. 2, Erumeli (7) P. O., Kottayam is justifiable ? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to ? G.O. (Rt.) No. 324/2015/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 16th March 2015. (9)

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an G.O. (Rt.) No. 330/2015/LBR. industrial dispute exists between Sri P. K. Ayoob, Thiruvananthapuram, 16th March 2015. Proprietor, Damas Weddding Silks, Civic Centre, Main Road, Chavakkad, Thrissur- 680 506 and the Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an workman of the above referred establishment industrial dispute exists between the President, Y.M.C.A., Smt. A. M. Yuhanath D/o Muhammadali, Aalungal Veedu, Chinnakkada, Kollam and the workman of the above Munneni, Akaladu P. O., Thrissur-680 518 in respect of referred establishment Smt. Biji Albert d/o Lazar, matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ; Cherupoika Veedu, Nandhirikkal, Vellimon P. O., Kundara in And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order; necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is adjudication; necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred adjudication; by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour three months. Court will pass the award within a period of three months. ANNEXURE ANNEXURE Whether the denial of employment to Smt. A. M. Yuhanath, Sales girl, by the Whether the denial of employment to management of M/s Damas Wedding Silks, Smt. Biji Albert, Cleaning Staff of Y.M.C.A. by is justifiable ? If not what relief she is the President, Y.M.C.A., Kollam is justifiable or entitled to get ? not ? If not, what relief she is entitled to get ?

9 78 KERALA GAZETTE [PART I

(10) (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for G.O. (Rt.) No. 331/2015/LBR. adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Thiruvananthapuram, 16th March 2015. Court will pass the award within a period of three Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an months. industrial dispute exists between Sri Anil Sukumaran, ANNEXURE Jyothis Cutlet (Jyothis Frozen Foods), Near High School Whether the denial of employment to Junction, Kollam and the workman of the above referred Smt. Bindhu Anil, helper by the management of establishment Smt. Bindhu Anil w/o Anil, Thamarapalli Jyothis Cutlet (Jyothis Frozen Foods), Near Vadakkathil, Thrikkadavur, Anchalummoodu, Kollam in High School Junction, Kollam is justifiable respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order; or not ? If not, what relief she is entitled And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is to get ? necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication; By order of the Governor,

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by MADHU, K., Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 Deputy Secretary to Government.