<<

Geofísica Internacional ISSN: 0016-7169 [email protected] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México México

Carciumaru, Dana; Ortega, Roberto On the origin of low angle normal faulting in the Southern Rift Geofísica Internacional, vol. 50, núm. 2, junio, 2011, pp. 177-190 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Distrito Federal, México

Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=56819976004

How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative GEOFÍSICA INTERNACIONAL (2011) 50­2: 177­190 ORIGINAL PAPER On the origin of low angle normal faulting in the Southern

Dana Carciumaru and Roberto Ortega

,'4'-A'*V#W)1'#XXO#XYY>T#"44'$&'*V#Q'M%)"%7#6O#XY66T#$)M+-(H'*#/1#+-1'V#S"%4H#X>O#XY66

Resumen Abstract

!"#$"%&'#()%#*'+#,-.&#,-/#0%"1*'#'(&2#*'31-*"#$/%# We reconstruct the stress regime in the East una serie de fallas normales de alto ángulo que Potrillo and Franklin Mountains. Using modern separan bloques elevados de grandes cuencas 1)B'%-4"+# &'4H1-D)'(# &H'# (&%'((# 3'+*# "1*# &H'# de depósitos del Cenozoico. Una serie de fallas tectonic history of this region is discussed normales de bajo ángulo se encuentran en los and extensional veins were compared with bloques elevados y sus relaciones con la cuenca y &H'# I'1'%"+# (&%'((# 3'+*C# JH'# B"K/%-&7# /.# .")+&(# con las estructuras montañosas es controversial. L'%'#%'"4&-A"&'*#*)%-1I#&H'#3%(&#,-/#0%"1*'#%-.&# Estudios preliminares concluyeron que las fallas extensional event and occurrence of extensive de bajo ángulo se formaron en una fase previa tilting and rotations occurred. In the East de extensión y después fueron inclinadas sobre Potrillo Mountains, back tilting by W25°SE and la orientación actual de fallas más recientes. W45°SE oriented along strikes of N30°W are Otros estudios concluyeron que estas fallas son el required in order to obtain two homogeneous resultado de un fallamiento reciente y son un factor (&%'((# 3'+*(C# JH'# 4/%%'4&'*# .")+&# $+"1'# (H/L(# clave en el desarrollo de las cuencas actuales y de "# (-I1-34"1&# /M+-D)'# 4/B$/1'1&# -1# M/&H# (&%'((# la topografía montañosa. Por esta razón, en esta 3'+*(C#JH'#3%(&#(&%'((#3'+*#4/%%'($/1*(#&/#"#.")+&# parte de la dorsal de Rift Rio Grande el análisis %'"4&-A"&-/1#L-&H#56#"1*#58#/%-'1&'*#9:;N<#"1*# de esfuerzos es una tarea difícil. Fechar la edad 9=>N<# %'($'4&-A'+7O# LH'%'"(# &H'# ('4/1*# (&%'((# geológica de las estructuras y el basculamiento 3'+*# -(# %'+"&'*# &/# &H'# 7/)1I'(&# .")+&# /%-'1&'*# extensivo del área son las principales fuentes de 9=?N@#"1*#9=6N<#%'($'4&-A'+7C#P1#&H'#Q%"1R+-1# error. En este artículo reconstruimos el régimen S/)1&"-1(O# &-+&-1I# -(# +'((# (-I1-34"1&T# H/L'A'%# de esfuerzos usando técnicas numéricas basadas &L/# (&%'((# 3'+*(# L-&H# (-B-+"%# /%-'1&"&-/1(# M)&# en estadística para dos montañas del Rift del *-..'%'1&# $H-# A"+)'(# "%'# %'4/I1-U'*C# JH'# $/(&# F# Rio Grande: y Franklin Laramide stress history of the region is controlled Mountains. El campo de esfuerzos y la historia M7# *-..'%'1&# 'G&'1(-/1"+# 'A'1&(# &H"&# -1E)'14'*# tectónica también se discuten. Las direcciones the preexisting structures and generated other de las venas extensionales fueron comparadas young fault systems. con el campo general de esfuerzos. Se encontró que la mayoría de las fallas fueron reactivadas Key words: stress inversion, low angle normal en la primera etapa de extensión de Rio Grande, faults, back tilting, Rio Grande rift. además con la ocurrencia de un basculamiento extensivo con rotaciones. En Potrillo Mountains se requiere un proceso de corrección angular por basculamiento de W25 SE y W45 SE orientado N30W para obtener dos campos de esfuerzos homogéneos. El plano de falla corregido muestra un componente oblicuo en estos dos campos de esfuerzos; el primero corresponde a la reactivación *'#+"(#."++"(#4/1#'+#56#7#58#/%-'1&"*/(#9:;<#7#9=><# respectivamente mientras el segundo campo de esfuerzos es relacionado con las fallas más actuales 7#'(#/%-'1&"*/#9=?@#7#9=6<#%'($'4&-A"B'1&'C#<1# Franklin Mountains el basculamiento es menos D. Carciumaru importante sin embargo dos campos de esfuerzos Orbis Consultores en Geología y Geofísica SC con orientaciones similares pero valores de phi ,'&/%1/#Z"+"3"#6XYO#Z/+C#Z"+"3"O diferentes fueron detectados (reconocidos). La La Paz, BCS, 23054, historia de esfuerzos post – Laramidica de la región México es controlada de diferentes eventos exensiónales Corresponding author: [email protected] D)'#-1E)'14-"%/1#+"(#'(&%)4&)%"(#$%'#F#'G-(&'1&'(# R. Ortega y también generaron un sistema de falla nueva. CICESE !"#["UO#S-%"E/%'(#88? Palabras clave: inversión de esfuerzos, falla Fracc. Bella Vista normal de bajo ángulo, correccion angular por La Paz, BCS, 23050 basculamiento, rift del Rio Grande. México

177 D. Carciumaru and R. Ortega

Introduction classical stress inversion method of Angelier ]6>>?_#(/#&H"&#"#+"%I'#1)BM'%#/.#/$&-B"+#(&%'(('(# JH'# (/)&H'%1# ,-/# 0%"1*'# %-.&# -(# *'31'*# M7# "# is computed and analysed as a point in stress series of high angle normal faults which separate ($"4'C#a-I1-34"1&#(&%'(('(#"%'#&H)(#%'$%'('1&'*# uplifted blocks of bedrock from large basins M7#4+)(&'%(#/.#$/-1&(C#`'%'#L'#"1"+7('#B)+&-$+'# L-&H# *''$# Z'1/U/-4# 3++C# 9)B'%/)(# +/L# "1I+'# inverse method results by the stress difference normal faults occur within the uplifted blocks technique proposed by Orife and Lisle (2003). whose relationship to the current basin and range structure has been controversial. Several Once the data set is corrected, we apply the previous studies have concluded that the low classical stress inversion technique of Michael angle faults were formed during an early phase ]6>;?_#-1#/%*'%#&/#%'4/1(&%)4&#&H'#&'4&/1-4#H-(&/%7# of extension and were tilted into their present /.#&H'#%'I-/1C#JL/#%'I-/1(O#&H'#<"(&#[/&%-++/#"1*# orientation by younger faults. Other studies have Franklin Mountains in the southern Rio Grande concluded that the faults are the result of recent rift are studied. Results in the East Potrillo faulting and are a key factor in the development Mountains suggest that a substantial tilting of the modern basin and range topography. For correction is needed. In the Franklin Mountains this reason in this part of the Rio Grande rift, &H'# &-+&-1I# 4/%%'4&-/1# -(# +'((# (-I1-34"1&# "1*# &L/# $"+'/(&%'((# "1"+7(-(# -(# "# *-.34)+&# &"(RC# \"&-1I# (&%'((# 3'+*(# L-&H# (-B-+"%# (&%'((# /%-'1&"&-/1# M)&# uncertainties of the geological structures and different stress ratio (phi value) were obtained. extensive tilting during periods of late Cenozoic JH-(# ()II'(&(# &H"&# &H'# %'I-/1# H"(# M''1# )1*'%# extension are the main sources of error. continuous deformation.

In the southern Rio Grande rift, a key Geological setting problem is determining if normal faults formed in response to different stress regimes or to a JH'#!"%"B-*'#&'4&/1-4(#/.#(/)&H'%1#9'L#S'G-4/# single progressive deformation. Dating geological remains controversial (Seager, 2004). Models structures in this region by means of crosscutting include thin ­ skinned tectonics (Corbitt and relations, mineral associations or stratigraphy is @//*L"%*O# 6>:8T# @//*L"%*# "1*# \)# ZH'1'O# *-.34)+&#M'4")('#B"17#1/%B"+#.")+&(#"%'#7/)1I# 6>;6_T# 4/)$+'*# L-&H# M"('B'1&# d# -1A/+A'*# /%# %'"4&-A"&'*# /+*'%# .")+&(C# JH'%'./%'O# +/L# "1*# ./%'+"1*# )$+-.&# ]\%'L'(O# 6>:;O# 6>;6O# 6>;;_O# high angle normal faulting in the Rio Grande rift L-&H# M"('B'1&# M+/4R# )$+-.&(# ]a'"I'%O# 6>;8T# -(# 4/1&%/A'%(-"+# ]!'L-(# "1*# ^"+*%-*I'O# 6>>?_C# a'"I'%#"1*#S"4RO#6>;c_#"1*#-1A'%(-/1#&'4&/1-4(# Extensive faulting and tilting may have occurred ]^"7/1"O#6>>;T#!"L&/1O#6>>=T#!"L&/1O#XYYY_C during two distinct extensional phases in the Rio Grande rift (Aldrich et alCO# 6>;=T# `'1%7# Outcrops of Laramide structures are mostly "1*# [%-4'O# 6>;?T# S/%I"1# et alCO# 6>;=T# a'"I'%# uplifted bed rock blocks. Most of the early et alCO# 6>;?_C# JH'%'./%'O# M"4R# &-+&-1I# .%/B# "# J'%&-"%7# *'./%B"&-/1# L"(# %'(&%-4&'*# &/# 1"%%/L# single correction factor is unlikely and rotation north ­ west trending fault zones that resulted in corrections are needed in order to reconstruct a series of northwest trending uplifts and basins %'+-"M+'#$"+'/(&%'((#3'+*(C ]a'"I'%O# XYY?_C# JH'# M"(-1(# "%'# "(7BB'&%-4"+T# they deepen to the south toward a thrust or Classical stress inversion is based on the idea reverse fault and they are generally associated /.# -131-&'(-B"+# (&%"-1C# b# *'31-&-/1# /.# (&%'((# ./%# with uplifts along their southwestern margins. &H'#4"('#/.#*'./%B"&-/1#L-&H#31-&'#%/&"&-/1(#-(#1/&# )1-D)'# ]Q)1IO# 6>=c_C# JH'%'./%'# -&# -(# 1'4'(("%7## JH'#$/(&#d#!"%"B-*'#(&%'((#%'I-B'#-(#L-*'+7# reconsider the analysis of deformation without recognized (Aldrich et alCO# 6>;=T# ^"+*%-*I'# et "#%'(&%-4&-/1#/.#-131-&'(-B"+#*-($+"4'B'1&(C#JH'# alCO#6>;YT#S/%I"1#"1*#0/+/BM'RO#6>;?T#S/%I"1# I'1'%"+-U"&-/1# .%/B# -131-&'(-B"+# (&%"-1# &H'/%7# et alCO#6>;=_C#JH'#,-/#0%"1*'#%-.&#/$'1'*#-1#&L/# &/# 31-&'# *'./%B"&-/1# -1A/+A'(# &%'B'1*/)(# stages associated with different stress regimes. complexity of the normal equations. Nonlinear JH'#3%(&#$H"('#/.#*'./%B"&-/1#/44)%%'*#.%/B#8Y# 3'+*# &H'/%7# -(# M'7/1*# &H'# (4/$'# /.# &H-(# $"$'%O# &/#6;#S"O#LH'1#(H"++/L#M"(-1(#M/)1*'*#M7#+/L# but another possible approach is to consider "1I+'# 1/%B"+# .")+&(# L'%'# ./%B'*C# JH-(# $'%-/*# mechanical or kinematic constraints. A likely is associated with volcanism and is attributed kinematic assumption is that tilted blocks are to a thinning of hot lithosphere with a shallow produced from an identical normalized stress brittle ­ ductile transition (Baldridge et alCO#6>>cT# tensor that conserves similar relations before Keller et alC#6>>6T#S/%I"1#"1*#0/+/BM'RO#6>;?_C# tilting, as successfully tested by Yamaji et al. Such low angle normal faults are only known in ]XYYc_# )(-1I# "%&-34-"+# *"&"C# JH'-%# &'4H1-D)'# -(# isolated areas, and their nature is still a point based on a multiple inverse method (Yamaji, /.# *'M"&'C# b# +"&'%# %-.&-1I# $H"('# M'I-11-1I# 6Y# 2000) that separates reduced stress tensors from Ma is associated with classic Basin and Range the earlier back tilted data. In heterogeneous style block faulting (Keller et alCO# 6>>6_# L-&H# data, subsets of faults are analysed with the delineation of the present interconnected rift basins and uplifts.

6:; VOLUME 50 NUMBER 2 GEOFÍSICA INTERNACIONAL

Aldrich et alC# ]6>;=_# "((/4-"&'# B"17# .")+&(# to major low angle normal faults in the southern and dikes with reactivated structures, but their Rio Grande rift. (&%-R'#L"(#1/&#*'31'*#-1#B/(&#"%'"(#*)'#&/#+"4R# of structural data. From dikes in plutons, and Studied region dating, they found the orientation of the least compressive stress was N ­ NE to S – SW; in JH'# <"(&# [/&%-++/# S/)1&"-1(# "1*# &H'# Q%"1R+-1# the late phase they found west ­ northwest to S/)1&"-1(#L'%'#(&)*-'*#-1#*'&"-+#]Q-I)%'#6_C#JH'# east ­ southeast extension. Aldrich et alC#]6>;=_# East Potrillo Mountains are located 20 to 22 miles "1*#ZH"$-1#"1*#Z"&H'%#]6>>?_#4/1(-*'%'*#'"%+7# (/)&H#/.#!"(#Z%)4'(O#9'L#S'G-4/C#JH'7#"%'#$"%&#/.# Miocene dikes in the roofs of plutons as the a north ­ northwest trending mountain chain that best indicators of regional stress orientations. crosses the Mexican border. Exposed Laramide Since they are only known at two locations, thrust faults belong to the southwestern margin they may not be representative of the regional /.#&H'#[/&%-++/#M"(-1C#JH'#1/%&HL'(&#'G&'1(-/1#/.# stress regime. In this study fault slip inversion this range subsurface is called “Potrillo uplift” is used to determine the state of stress adjacent (Lawton 2000).

Figure 1.#0'/+/I-4"+#B"$#/.#&H'#%'I-/1C#JH'#&L/#(&)*-'*#"%'"(#"%'#&H'#<"(&#[/&%-++/#S/)1&"-1(#]-1('&(#6#"1*#X_#"1*# &H'#Q%"1R+-1#S/)1&"-1(#]-1('_C#^/&H#%"1I'(#"%'#+/4"&'*#"&#&H'#1/%&H'%1#B"%I-1#/.#&H'#ZH-H)"H)"#&%/)IH#]B/*-3'*# from Ruiz, 2004).

APRIL ­ JUNE 2011 6:> D. Carciumaru and R. Ortega

Lower Cretaceous rocks are dominant in be probably early Miocene in age, thus they must the outcrop of the East Potrillo Mountains, with have formed during an early phase of extension narrow belts of Permian rocks on the east and in the Rio Grande rift. L'(&#(-*'(#/.#&H'#%"1I'C#a'"I'%#"1*#S"4R#]6>>?_# described marine clastic and carbonate shelf In the Franklin Mountains, substantial tilting deposits above a basal conglomerate: all of them occurred late during the range uplift. According &H-1#(/)&HL"%*C#JH'('#(/B'LH"&#"%R/(-4#4+"(&-4# &/#!/A'K/7#"1*#a'"I'%#]6>:;_O#8cN##&-+&-1I#&//R# rocks and limestones contain Albian ­ Aptian "M/)&# X8# Sb# &/# *'A'+/$C# JH'7# "&&%-M)&'*# B/(&# ./((-+(#"1*#4/%%'+"&'#L-&H#&H'#`'++d&/dQ-1-(H#"1*# of the low angle faults to large scale landsliding U­Bar formations of southwestern . and “gravity glide” as the range was uplifted. Conglomerate beds contain clasts of lower `/L'A'%O#('A'%"+#%'4'1&#(&)*-'(#H"A'#4/14+)*'*# Z%'&"4'/)(# 4"%M/1"&'(# ]^%/*'%-4RO# 6>;?_# "1*# that the Franklin Mountains are the result of B)(&# M'O# 7/)1I'%# &H"1# '"%+7# Z%'&"4'/)(C# JH'# &-+&-1I#L-&H-1#&H'#+"(Y#B"#]!)'&H#et alCO#6>>;T# arkosic rocks may indicate uplift and erosion of a'"I'%O#6>;6_C# JH'# 1/%&H'%1B/(&# $"%&# .'"&)%'(# the underlying or adjacent Precambrian granite homoclinally west dipping Paleozoic limestones during Laramide time. Laramide deformation and shales (Fig. 4). Unusual structures in this in the East Potrillo Mountains is intense. Folds part of the range include north ­ northwest and associated thrust faults involve lower ­ trending low angle normal faults. Kelly and Cretaceous and Permian rocks trending N30°W S"&H'17# ]6>;8_# 4/14+)*'*# &H"&# &H'('# .")+&(# and converging toward the northeast (Fig. 2 and were produced by tilting of steeper faults and Fig. 3). A system of low ­ angle normal faults fractures as the Franklin Mountains were uplifted is also exposed in the East Potrillo Mountains. "1*#&-+&'*#L'(&#](''#"+(/#a'"I'%O#6>;6_C a'"I'%#"1*#S"4R#]6>>?_#4/1(-*'%#&H'('#.")+&(#&/#

Figure 2. Geological map of the north­ ern part of the East Potrillo Mountains. JH'#&L/#B"-1#./%B"&-/1(#"%'#`'++d&/d Finish and U­Bar, overlying Permian %/4R(C#JH'#I'1'%"+#&%'1*#/.#&H'#(&%)4­ &)%'(#-(#/%-'1&'*#98=N@#]".&'%#a'"I'%# "1*#S"4RO#6>>?_C

6;Y VOLUME 50 NUMBER 2 GEOFÍSICA INTERNACIONAL

Figure 3. Geological map of the southern part of the East Potrillo S/)1&"-1(C# JH'# &L/# main formations are `'++d&/dQ-1-(H# "1*# fd Bar, overlying Permian rocks (after Seager "1*#S"4RO#6>>?_C

o Methods including that fractures form at ~30 #&/#56 and o &H"5O#I'1'%"++7#"1I+'(#"&#e=Y to the fractures, Finding the stress tensor from fault orientation which would correspond to normal faulting by involves an assumption that the direction of Anderson´s criteria. Caution is required when tangential traction in the plane tends to be para­ dealing with other types of faults (e.g, listric or llel to the slip direction; this tangential traction low­angle normal faults). is also assumed to be parallel to the shear stress ],"B("7#"1*#!-(+'O#6>>:_C#@'#"(()B'#&H"&#&H'# Multiple inverse method is a numerical incremental principal strain axes coincide with the technique for separating stress from heteroge­ $%-14-$"+#(&%'((#"G'(C#JH'%'./%'#-.#&H'#&"1I'1&-"+# neous fault­slip data (Yamaji, 2000). It is traction can be determined on a variety of planes based on classic stress inversion by grouping in a region, it may be possible to make inferences data in multiple sets in order to analyze their "M/)&#&H'#%'I-/1"+#(&%'((#3'+*#M7#-1A'%(-/1C# statistical behavior. We minimize the observed and theoretical fault­slip data obtained from !/L# "1I+'# 1/%B"+# .")+&(# "%'# *-.34)+&# &/# /)&4%/$(C#JH'#-1A'%(-/1#*"&"#-14+)*'#&H'#"&&-&)*'# reconstruct in terms of stress inversion since of fault planes, the orientation of striations and they cannot be easily explained from Mohr­ &H'# (+-$# *-%'4&-/1(C# JH'('# D)"1&-&-'(# "%'# 1/1# F# Coulomb failure criteria (Davis et alCO#6>;8_C#JH'# dimensional: only the deviatoric part of the stress direction of maximum resolved shear stress is &'1(/%#4"1#M'#/M&"-1'*C#`/L'A'%O#&H'#(&%'((#%"&-/# constrained by experiment and observations to phi is also determined in order to characterize

+-'#-1#&H'#$+"1'#/.#&H'#.")+&#"1*#-1#&H'#56#d#53 plane. the relationship between the principal stress Mohr­Coulomb criteria lead to some assumptions components. on the orientations of the principal stresses,

APRIL ­ JUNE 2011 6;6 D. Carciumaru and R. Ortega

Figure 4. Geological map of the Anthony Gap area, northern Franklin Mountains (after Kel­ +'7# "1*# S"&H'17O# 6>;8T# Q-I)'%(O#6>;:O#"1*#`"%­ M/)%O#6>:X_C

In the East Potrillo Mountains, faults with the principal stresses. It suggests a possibility good slickenside lineations were found in to exchange the principal and intermediate silica­cemented calcareous siltstones, which "G'(C# JH'# $%-14-$"+# "G'(# B"7# M'# *-.34)+&# &/# M'# "%'# 4/BB/1# -1# &H'# `'++d&/dQ-1-(H# ./%B"&-/1C# exchanged, but this strongly depends on the Slickenlines within major fault zones are rarely .%-4&-/1"+# 4/'.34-'1&# ."4&/%# ]`)# "1*# b1I'+-'%O# observed due to poor exposures and pervasive 2004). cataclasis. Fault strike and dip as well as slickenline trend, plunge, and shear sense were Data measured at outcrops. All data were inverted using the tilt correction for paleostress analysis We# 4/++'4&'*# .")+&# *"&"# .%/B# "A"-+"M+'# 6VX?YYY# (Yamaji et al., 2005). After the fault population I'/+/I-4"+# B"$(# ]`"%M/)%O# 6>:XT# g'++7# "1*# was back tilted, we used the inverse method of S"&H'17O# 6>;8T# a'"I'%# "1*# S"4RO# 6>>?_# "1*# S-4H"'+# ]6>;?_# &/# '(&-B"&'# &H'# %'I-/1"+# (&%'((# .%/B#3'+*#*"&"C#J/$/I%"$H-4#B"$(#L'%'#)('*#"(# tensor: it revealed a tensional regime with an 3'+*#I)-*'(C#a&%'((#"1*#(&%"-1#-1A'%(-/1(#%'D)-%'# -B$/%&"1&# /M+-D)'# 4/B$/1'1&C# JH'# $H-# A"+)'# accurate slickenline data: fault striations are was about 0.5, it measures the relative size of sparse in published maps. Useful structural data

6;X VOLUME 50 NUMBER 2 GEOFÍSICA INTERNACIONAL included extensional veins, fold limb orientations, a'"I'%#"1*#S"4R#]6>>?_#%'(&/%'*#&H'#+/L#"1I+'# cleavage planes and bedding directions. Seager normal faults by correcting for westward dip of "1*#S"4R#]6>>?_#()II'(&'*#&H"&#"#&-+/%%'4&-/1#/.# &H'#%"1I'#M7#"#%/&"&-/1#/.#XcNC#JH-(#4/%%'4&-/1#-(########### 25°SW is required in the East Potrillo Mountains; A-%&)"++7# &H'# ("B'# "(# &H'# cYi# &-+&# 4/%%'4&-/1# &H-(#L"(#/M&"-1'*#.%/B#.'L#3'+*#/M('%A"&-/1(#/.# (H/L1# -1# Q-I)%'# :C# 9/&'# &H"&# "# cYi# 4/%%'4&-/1# bedding. It is important to note that this angle is adequate only for the NE trending faults. For merely corrects the range position, but does not &H'# /&H'%# .")+&(O# "# 6YYi# 4/%%'4&-/1# -(# B/%'# restore individual displacements on each fault "$$%/$%-"&'#]Q-I)%'#>_C#JH'#.")+&d(+-$#*"&"#"&#cY# due to incremental strain during the youngest "1*#6YYi#&-+/%%'4&-/1#L'%'#(&-++#H'&'%/I'1'/)(O# extensional period. It is the minimum correction suggesting that a simple progressive back tilting to obtain the original position of the faults. about the N30°W axis was not entirely true. Slight %/&"&-/1(#B"7#H"A'#/4)%%'*#/A'%#&-B'C#`/L'A'%O# In the Franklin Mountains most of the data these corrections are not important as compared were from the Anthony Gap in the northern part to those from the back tilting correction. /.#&H'#%"1I'C#`'%'#H-IH#"1I+'#1/%B"+#.")+&(#"%'# exposed as they grade into large displacement, For the Franklin Mountains, back tilting was low angle normal faults. B)4H# +'((# (-I1-34"1&# ]Q-IC66_C# JH'# M"4R# &-+&-1I# corrections yielded no important difference in Back tilting the results; thus these faults may have occurred ".&'%# &H'# B"-1# &-+&-1I# /.# &H'# M+/4RC# JH'# /%-I-1"+# faults that were rotated to produce low angle Because of the large differences between 1/%B"+#.")+&(#M'4"B'#-1'.34-'1&O#"1*#H-IH#"1I+'# the Franklin Mountains and the East Potrillo .")+&(# *'A'+/$'*# +"&'%C# JH'# B)+&-$+'# -1A'%('# Mountains, we examined the possibility that the method yields two clusters with similar stress .")+&(# L'%'# %/&"&'*C# JH'# M"4R# &-+&-1I# "+I/%-&HB# *-%'4&-/1(# M)&# *-..'%'1&# (&%'((# %"&-/(# %'E'4&-1I## of Yamaji et al. (2005) was found to be useful. continuity of stress over time. JH-(# "$$%/"4H# "(()B'(# &H"&# &-+&'*# M+/4R(# "%'# produced by an identical normalized stress Structures in the East Potrillo Mountains tensor that preserves its orientation before and after backtilting contain a substantial oblique ".&'%#&-+&-1IC#JH'7#()II'(&#&H"&#&H'#B'&H/*#4"1# component. Oblique components are commonly be applied when fault orientation was changed referred to as structures that were formed under by later deformation, as in the low angle normal a transpressional or transtensional stress regime. faults of the southern Rio Grande rift (Seager, In the case of oblique components produced by 6>;6_C# P&# B"7# M'# )('*# -1# M+/4R(# &-+&'*# M7# subsequent rotations, it is inappropiate to use extensional tectonics if they have a similar strike the current structural relations as the present of bedding in the hanging and footwall blocks. (&"&'C# JH)(O# "# 1/%B"+# .")+&# I'1'%"&'*# M7# "1# JH-(# 4/1(&%"-1&# B"7# 1/&# M'# '1&-%'+7# K)(&-3'*# -1# extensional tectonic regime and rotated during the East Potrillo Mountains, given the complex subsequent strike­slip should not be called I'/+/I7# /.# &H'# %"1I'C# `/L'A'%O# !"%"B-*'# "1# /M+-D)'# 'G&'1(-/1# (&%)4&)%'C# JH'# &'%B(# structures in the Potrillo Mountains have similar transtension, and oblique extension structure orientations in the hanging and footwalls of imply syn­tectonic characteristics. As with any the normal faults, so that the correction may *'(4%-$&-/1# /.# (&%"-1O# -&# -(# '(('1&-"+# &/# 31*# /)&# M'# A"+-*C# JH'# B)+&-$+'# -1A'%('# B'&H/*# ]h"B"K-O# why the oblique deformation occurred, and for 2000) separates reduced stress tensors from which period this geometrical relation is valid. the previously back tilted data. It analyses stress from heterogeneous data by preparing Extensional veins subsets of faults and applying the classical stress -1A'%(-/1# B'&H/*# /.# b1I'+-'%# ]6>;?_# (/# &H"&# "# Calcite veins are common extensional structures great number of optimal stresses is computed -1#&H'#<"(&#[/&%-++/#S/)1&"-1(C#P1#Q-I)%'#6X#&H'# and analysed as a point in stress space. distribution of calcite veins of the central part of a-I1-34"1&#(&%'(('(#"%'#%'$%'('1&'*#"(#4+)(&'%(# the range is shown. In the northern part of the of points. Strong clustering is an indication that range most extensional structures are distributed the multiple inverse results are valid. more heterogeneously than in the central part of &H'# %"1I'C# `/L'A'%O#&H'%'# -(# 1/# 'A-*'14'# &H"&# In the East Potrillo Mountains, progressive they belong to different episodes, since there is M"4R# &-+&-1I# /.# &H'# *"&"# .%/B# Y# &/# 6YYi# "M/)&# no correlation to other extensional structures. a trend of N30°W trending rotation axis with a JH'7# "%'# +/4"&'*# -1# "# B)4H# B/%'# *'./%B'*# $+)1I'#?cNa#-(#*'$-4&'*#-1#Q-I)%'(#c#&/#>C#P1#"**-d region where the population of folds, overturned tion, the restored stereographic projections are structures and thrust faults is higher. On the $+/&&'*C#^'7/1*#cYi#]Q-IC#:_O#&H'#&-+/%%'4&-/1# other hand, the poles of calcite veins in the rotated the attitude of the faults by a negligible 4'1&%"+#$"%&#/.#&H'#%"1I'#]Q-IC6X_#"%'#4/1(-(&'1&# amount but the rake of the slip vectors was with maximum extension of the Rio Grande rift. rotated by few degrees.

APRIL ­ JUNE 2011 6;8 D. Carciumaru and R. Ortega

Figure 5. Normal faults of the East Potrillo S/)1&"-1(#M"4R#&-+&'*#YiC#P1#"**-&-/1#&H'# stereographic projection and the theoretical and observed tangential lineations of &H'# (&%'((# 3'+*# .%/B# &H'# B)+&-$+'# -1A'%('# method is shown.

Figure 6. Normal faults of the East Potrillo S/)1&"-1(#M"4R#&-+&'*#XciC#P1#"**-&-/1#&H'# stereographic projection and the theoreti­ cal and observed tangential lineations of &H'# (&%'((# 3'+*# .%/B# &H'# B)+&-$+'# -1A'%('# method is shown.

6;? VOLUME 50 NUMBER 2 GEOFÍSICA INTERNACIONAL

Figure 7. Normal faults of the East Potrillo S/)1&"-1(#M"4R#&-+&'*#cYiC#P1#"**-&-/1#&H'# stereographic projection and the theoreti­ cal and observed tangential lineations of &H'# (&%'((# 3'+*# .%/B# &H'# B)+&-$+'# -1A'%('# method is shown.

Figure 8. Normal faults of the East Potrillo S/)1&"-1(#M"4R#&-+&'*#:ciC#P1#"**-&-/1#&H'# stereographic projection and the theoreti­ cal and observed tangential lineations of &H'# (&%'((# 3'+*# .%/B# &H'# B)+&-$+'# -1A'%('# method is shown.

APRIL ­ JUNE 2011 6;c D. Carciumaru and R. Ortega

Figure 9. Normal faults of the East Potrillo Mountains back tilted 6YYiC# P1# "**-&-/1# &H'# (&'%'/I%"$H-4# $%/K'4&-/1# "1*# &H'# &H'/%'&-4"+# "1*#/M('%A'*#&"1I'1&-"+#+-1'"&-/1(#/.#&H'#(&%'((#3'+*#.%/B#&H'#B)+&-­ ple inverse method is shown.

Discussion It correlates with cinder cone alignments and JH'#B"-1#"(()B$&-/1#/.#(&%'((#"1"+7(-(#-(#&H"&#&H'# 'G&'1(-/1"+# A'-1(C# JH'%'./%'O# "&# &H-(# &-B'# &H'# principal strain axes match the principal stress main normal fault system in the range originated. axes. Some authors prefer a method based on shear and principal stress axis, others tangential JH'# H-IH# 'G&'1(-/1"+# %"&'# "1*# &H'# -14%'"('# traction and principal strain axes. Marret and in extensional structures indicate an important ['"4/4R# ]6>>>_# *-(4)((# (/B'# $%/M+'B(# %'+"&'*# contribution of normal faults over the general to terminology that may lead to confusing .")+&# (7(&'BC# `/L'A'%O# &H'('# (&%)4&)%'(# L'%'# descriptions. Each method should be described tilted during the last extensional period. in terms of variables and objectives. Instead of stress inversion, a mere correct term would be JH'('#.")+&(#L'%'#4/%%'4&'*#./%#98YN@#&%'1d principal axis estimation by fault­slip inversion. *-1I# -1# /%*'%# &/# %'(&/%'# &H'# &-+&-1IC# JH'7# (H/L# Our general results are robust enough to evidence of important oblique displacements determine the direction of the principal axis of the that can not be restored by tilting correction, (&%'((#3'+*C#JH'#(&%'((#"1*#(&%"-1#-1A'%(-/1#(H/L(# suggesting rather an incremental displacement that the maximum extension is roughly N­S. .%/B#&H'#+"(&#'G&'1(-/1"+#$'%-/*C#JH-(#*-($+"4'B'1&# caused such small angles in fault striations since \)%-1I# '"%+7# S-/4'1'O# &H'# 3%(&# 'G&'1(-/1"+# they coincide with the last reported direction of episode of the Rio Grande rift caused substantial 'G&'1(-/1#-1#&H'#,-/#0%"1*'#%-.&C#Q-I)%'#68#(H/L(# 4H"1I'(# -1# &H'# (&%'((# 3'+*# /.# &H'# *'./%B'*# the tectonic history of the region. It is evident +/L'%# Z%'&"4'/)(# %/4R(# -1# &H'# %'I-/1C# JH'# 3%(&# that a simple reconstruction is but a crude N­S extensional period of the Rio Grande rift representation of the episodes from the early generated major extensional structures in the Miocene to present, as these events occurred (&)*-'*# "%'"C# JH-(# $'%-/*# H"(# M''1# 4/1(-*'%'*# when the evolution of this range was already to have reached the highest extensional rate. highly deformed by the Laramide orogeny.

6;= VOLUME 50 NUMBER 2 GEOFÍSICA INTERNACIONAL

Figure 10. Multiple inverse method results from back tilting in East Po­ &%-++/#S/)1&"-1(C#JL/#*-..'%'1+)(&'%(# "&#cY#"1*#6YYi#"%'#%'4/I1-U'*C#JH'# cYi# %'I-/1# 4/%%'($/1*(# &/# &H'# 9<# &%'1*-1I#.")+&(#"1*#&H'#6YYi#"%'#&H'# NW older and reactivated faults.

Figure 11. Multiple inverse method analysis in the Franklin Mountains. No back tilting correction was needed in /%*'%#&/#/M&"-1#%/M)(&#%'()+&(C#`/L'd A'%# &L/# 4+)(&'%(# /.# .jYC6# "1*# .jYC:# were observed.

APRIL ­ JUNE 2011 6;: D. Carciumaru and R. Ortega

Figure 12. Map of the calcite veins in the central part of the East Potrillo Mountains, showing the planes and the poles to the planes.

Figure 13. Schematic representation of the two main epi­ sodes in the southern Rio Grande rift. a) In the early Mio­ 4'1'O#&H'#3%( #d#a#'G&'1(-/1"+#$'%-/*#/.#&H'#,k/#0%"1*'# rift generated the main extensional structures including 1/%B"+# .")+&(O# 'G&'1(-/1"+# A'-1(# "1*# A/+4"1-4# '*-34'(C# b) During the second E ­ W extensional stage of the Rio Grande rift a substantial oblique displacement generated important rotations over the normal faults. In addition, a second system of N ­ S normal faults were generated.

6;; VOLUME 50 NUMBER 2 GEOFÍSICA INTERNACIONAL

Acknowledgments \%'L'(# `CO# 6>:;O# JH'# Z/%*-++'%"1# /%/I'1-4# M'+&# between Nevada and : Geolog. JH-(# "%&-4+'# L"(# $"%&# /.# "# [HC\C# &H'(-(# M7# \CZ# Soc. Am. Bull.O#;>O#=?6d=c:C "&#&H'#f1-A'%(-&7#/.#J'G"(#"&#<+#["(/#)1*'%#&H'# supervision of Christopher Andronicos. D.C \%'L'(# `CO# 6>;6O# J'4&/1-4(# /.# (/)&H'"(&'%1# &H"1R(# \%C# b1*%/1-4/(# ./%# H-(# 3'+*# "((-(&"14'# Arizona: U.S. Geolog. Surv. Prof. Paper, during this project. Randy Keller’s suggestions 6O6??O#>>#$$C in an earlier version manuscript is gratefully acknowledged. \%'L'(# `CO# 6>;;O# \'A'+/$B'1&# /.# &H'# ./%'+"1*# zone and adjacent teranes of the Cordilleran Bibliography orogenic belt near the U.S. Mexican border: Geolog. Soc. Am. Mem.,#6:6O#??:d?=8C b+*%-4H#SCWCW%CO#ZH"$-1#ZC;=O# Stress history and tectonic development of Q)1I#hCZCO#6>=cO#Q/)1*"&-/1(#/.#a/+-*#S'4H"1-4(V# the Rio Grande rift, New Mexico: J. Geophys. 9'L#W'%('7O#[%'1&-4'd`"++O#P14O#$"ICCCCC Res.O#>6O#=O6>>d=OX66C# `"%M/)%# ,C!CO# 6>:XO# 0'/+/I7# /.# &H'# 1/%&H'%1# b1I'+-'%#WCO#6>;?O#J'4&/1-4#"1"+7(-(#/.#.")+&#(+-$# Q%"1R+-1# S/)1&"-1(O# J'G"(# "1*# 9'L# S'G-4/V# data set: J. Geophys. Res.O# ;>]^:_O# cO;8cd U.S Geolog. Surv. Bull.O#6X>;O#6X>#$$C cO;?;C `'1%7#ZC\CO#[%-4'#WC0CO#6>;?O#l"%-"&-/1(#-1#4"+*'%"# ^"+*%-*I'# @CaCO# \"B/1# [C;YO# O# Rio Grande rift, New Mexico: New Potassium ;O:=cd;O:;=C – Argon ages: Earth Plan. Sci. Let.O#c6O#8Y>d 8X6C `)#WCZCO#b1I'+-'%#WCO#XYY?O#a&%'((#$'%B)&"&-/1(V# JH%''d*-B'1(-/1"+# *-(&-14&# '+'B'1&# "1"+7(-(# ^"+*%-*I'#@CaCO#g'++'%#0C,CO#`""R#lCO#@'1*+"1*&# accounts for a common phenomenon in brittle >cO# ,-/# tectonics: J. Geophys. Res.O# 6Y>O# ^Y>?Y8O# 0%"1*'#%-.&O#-1V#m+('1O#gC`C]'*C_O#Z/1&-1'1&"+# */-V#6YC6YX>nXYY8W^YYX=6=C# rifts: Evolution, Structure and Tectonics, Developments in GeotectonicsO#XcO#X88dX:=C g'++'%# 0C,CO# S/%I"1# [CO# a'"I'%# @C,CO# 6>>6O# Crustal structure, gravity anomalies and ^"7/1"# 0CO# 6>>;O# a&%"&-I%"$H-4# %'+"&-/1(H-$(# H'"&#E/L#-1#&H'#(/)&H'%1#,-/#0%"1*'#%-.&#"1*# of Cretaceous and Paleogene deposits and their relationship to extensional tectonics: their tectonic implications central Peloncillo Tectonophy.O#6:?O#X6d8:C S/)1&"-1(O#`-*"+I/#Z/)1&7O#9'L#S'G-4/V#9'L# Mexico, New Mexico State University, M.S. g'++'7#aCbCO#S"&H'17#WC[CO#6>;8O#0'/+/I-4"+#S"$O# &H'(-(O#6Xc#$$C Geology of Anthony Gap quadrangle, Dona b1"# Z/)1&7O# 9'L# S'G-4/O# (4"+'# 6VX?OYYV# ^%/*'%-4R#WCZCO#6>;?O#JH'#I'/+/I7#/.#0%"1-&'#`-++O# New Mexico, New Mexico Bureau Mineral and Luna County, New Mexico: El Paso, University ,'(/)%4'(O#6#B"$C /.#J'G"(#"&#<+#["(/O#SCaC#&H'(-(O#6=Y#$$C !"L&/1# JCQCO# 6>>=O# !"%"B-*'# -1A'%(-/1# /.# !"&'# ZH"$-1#ZC>?O#J'4&/1-4#('&&-1I# Jurassic – Early Cretaceous extensional faults, of the axial basins of the northern and central southestern Arizona and southwestern New Rio Grande rift, in: Keller, G.R., Cather, Mexico, in Geological Society of America S.M., (eds.), Basins of the Rio Grande Rift: meeting, Denver: Geological Society of a&%)4&)%'O#a&%"&-I%"$H7#"1*#J'4&/1-4#('&&-1IV# bB'%-4"O#bM(&%"4&(#L-&H#[%/I%"B(O#X;O#8Y>#$$C Special Paper. Geol. Soc. AmericaO# X>6# d# PO# 5­235. !"L&/1#JCQCO#XYYYO#P1A'%(-/1#/.#W)%"((-4#F#<"%+7# Cretaceous extensional faults of the Bisbee Z/%M-&&# !C!CO# @//*L"%*# !CbCO# 6>:8O# J'4&/1-4# basin, southeastern Arizona and southwestern framework of Cordilleran fold­belt in 9'L#S'G-4/O#-1V#!"L&/1O#JC#QCO#S4S-++"1#9C#WCO# southwestern New Mexico: American S4!'B/%'O#lC#JC#]'*(_O#a/)&HL'(&#["(("I'#F# Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, A trip through the Phanerozoic: New Mexico c:#]66_O#XOXY:dXOX6=C a/4-'&7#0)-*'M//RO#c6O#>cd6YXC

\"A-(#\CO#a)$$'#WCO#\"H+'1#QCbCO#6>;8O#S'4H"1-4(# !'L-(#ZCO#^"+*%-*I'#@CaCO#6>>?O#`"+.#F#I%"M'1(O# /.# Q/+*d"1*dJH%)(&# ^'+&(# "1*# b44%'&-/1"%7# accommodation zones, and shoulder uplifts Wedges: J. Geophys. Res.O# ;;# ]^X_O# 66c8d in the – Sierra Lucero area, in: 6O6:XC Keller, G.R., Cather, S.M. (eds.), Basins of the

APRIL ­ JUNE 2011 6;> D. Carciumaru and R. Ortega

Rio Grande Rift: Structure, Stratigraphy and a'"I'%# @C,CO# 6>;8O# !"%"B-*'# L%'14H# .")+&(O# J'4&/1-4#('&&-1IV Spec. Pap. Geol. Soc. Am., basement­cored uplifts, and complementary X>6O#68cd6ccC basins in southern New Mexico: New Mexico 0'/+/I7O#cO#=>d:=C !/A'K/7#:;O#\-(4)((-/1#/.# structural geology of Franklin Mountains in: a'"I'%# @C,CO# aH"3-D)++"H# SCO# `"L+7# WC@CO# `"L+'7O#WCJC#]'*C_O# 0)-*'M//R# &/# ,-/# 0%"1*'# S"1*"%A-1#,CQCO#6>;?O#9'L#g#d#b%#*"&'(#.%/B# rift in New Mexico and : New Mexico basalts and the evolution of the southern Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources Rio Grande rift: Geolog. Soc. Am. Bull.O# >cO# Z-%4)+"%O#6=8O#=;d=>C ;:d>>C

!)'&H# lC@CO# 0//*'++# [CZCO# `'-U+'%# SCJCO# ['&'%(# a'"I'%# @C,CO# S"4R# 0C`CO# 6>;cO# !"%"B-*'# !CO# 6>>;O# 0'/4H'B-(&%7O# I'/4H%/1/+/I7# "1*# paleotectonics of southern New Mexico: tectonic implications of jarosite mineralization American Association of Petroleoum in the northern Franklin Mountains, Dona 0'/+/I-(&(#S'B/-%O#?6O#==>d=;cC County, New Mexico: New Mexico Geological a/4-'&7#0)-*'M//RO#?>O#8Y>d86=C a'"I'%#@C,CO#S"4R#0C`CO#6>>?O#0'/+/I7#/.#<"(&# Potrillo Mountains and vicinity, Dona Ana S"%%'&&# ,CO# ['"4/4R# \CZC[CO# 6>>>O# a&%"-1# "1*# County, New Mexico: New Mexico Bureau of stress: J. Struc. GeologyO#X6O#6OYc:d6OY=8C S-1'(#"1*#S-1'%"+#,'(/)%4'(#^)++'&-1O#668C#

S-4H"'+#bCWCO#6>;?O#\'&'%B-1"&-/1#/.#(&%'((#.%/B# Seager W.R., 2004, Laramide (Late Cretaceous slip data: faults and folds: J. Geophys. Res., – Eocene) tectonics of southwestern New ;>O#66Oc6:d66OcX=C# S'G-4/C# -1V# S"4RO# 0C# `CO# 0-+'(# gC# bC# ]'*(C_O# JH'# 0'/+/I7# /.# 9'L# S'G-4/O# 0'/+/I-4# S/%I"1# [CO# 0/+/BM'4R# SC[CO# 6>;?O# Q"4&/%(# `-(&/%7V#9'L#S'G-4/#0'/+/I-4#a/4-'&7#a$'4-"+# controlling the phases and styles of extension [)M+-4"&-/1O#66O#6;8dXYXC in the northern Rio Grande rift: New Mexico Geological Society Guidebook, 35th Field @//*L"%*#!CbCO#\)ZH'1'#`C,CO#6>;6O#mA'%&H%)(&# Z/1.'%'14'O#68d6>C belt of southwestern New Mexico: comparison with Wyoming – Utah overthrust: American S/%I"1#[CO#a'"I'%#@C,CO#0/+/BM'4R#SC[CO#6>;=O# Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, Cenozoic thermal, mechanical and tectonic =cO#:XXd:X>C evolution of the Rio Grande rift: J. Geophys. Res.O#>6O#=OX=8d=OX:=C h"B"K-# bCO# XYYYO# JH'# B)+&-$+'# -1A'%('# B'&H/*V# a new technique to separate stresses from m%-.'# JCO# !-(+'# ,CWCO# XYY8O# 9)B'%-4"+# $%/4'((-1I# heterogeneous fault­slip data: J. Struc. of paleostress results: J. Struc. Geology, 25 GeologyO#XXO#??6d?cXC ]=_O >?>d>c:C h"B"K-#bCO#J/B-&"#aCO#m&()M/#SCO#XYYcO#^'**-1I# ,"B("7#WC0CO#!-(+'#,CWCO#6>>:O#JH'#J'4H1-D)'(#/.# tilt test for paleostress analysis: J. Struc. Modern Structural Geology. Applications of GeologyO#X:O#6=6d6:YC Continuum Mechanics in Structural Geology: a"1#\-'I/O#b4"*'B-4#[%'((O#6OY=6$C a'"I'%#@C,CO#6>;6O#0'/+/I7#/.#&H'#m%I"1#S/)1d tains and southern , New Mexico: New Mexico Bureau of Mines "1*#S-1'%"+#,'(/)%4'(#S'B/-%O#8=,#6d>:C

6>Y VOLUME 50 NUMBER 2