Community Guide MERP Toronto Campus
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
City of Toronto — Detached Homes Average Price by Percentage Increase: January to June 2016
City of Toronto — Detached Homes Average price by percentage increase: January to June 2016 C06 – $1,282,135 C14 – $2,018,060 1,624,017 C15 698,807 $1,649,510 972,204 869,656 754,043 630,542 672,659 1,968,769 1,821,777 781,811 816,344 3,412,579 763,874 $691,205 668,229 1,758,205 $1,698,897 812,608 *C02 $2,122,558 1,229,047 $890,879 1,149,451 1,408,198 *C01 1,085,243 1,262,133 1,116,339 $1,423,843 E06 788,941 803,251 Less than 10% 10% - 19.9% 20% & Above * 1,716,792 * 2,869,584 * 1,775,091 *W01 13.0% *C01 17.9% E01 12.9% W02 13.1% *C02 15.2% E02 20.0% W03 18.7% C03 13.6% E03 15.2% W04 19.9% C04 13.8% E04 13.5% W05 18.3% C06 26.9% E05 18.7% W06 11.1% C07 29.2% E06 8.9% W07 18.0% *C08 29.2% E07 10.4% W08 10.9% *C09 11.4% E08 7.7% W09 6.1% *C10 25.9% E09 16.2% W10 18.2% *C11 7.9% E10 20.1% C12 18.2% E11 12.4% C13 36.4% C14 26.4% C15 31.8% Compared to January to June 2015 Source: RE/MAX Hallmark, Toronto Real Estate Board Market Watch *Districts that recorded less than 100 sales were discounted to prevent the reporting of statistical anomalies R City of Toronto — Neighbourhoods by TREB District WEST W01 High Park, South Parkdale, Swansea, Roncesvalles Village W02 Bloor West Village, Baby Point, The Junction, High Park North W05 W03 Keelesdale, Eglinton West, Rockcliffe-Smythe, Weston-Pellam Park, Corso Italia W10 W04 York, Glen Park, Amesbury (Brookhaven), Pelmo Park – Humberlea, Weston, Fairbank (Briar Hill-Belgravia), Maple Leaf, Mount Dennis W05 Downsview, Humber Summit, Humbermede (Emery), Jane and Finch W09 W04 (Black Creek/Glenfield-Jane -
Centerpoint Trade Area Analysis.Pdf
An Exceed Location Intelligence Report for North York| Centerpoint Mall 1st Trade Area(s) Comparison Location Analytics and Optimization for Canadian Real Estate Trade Area of Interest (TAoI) Filters Calbration Parameters North York| Centerpoint Mall Prov R ▶ 1st TA % N ▶ 1st TA % 0 100 1st Trade Area(s) Comparison All Markham| First Markham Place (R) Primary TA Layers C ▶ 1st TA % N ▶ 2nd TA % 100 100 North York| Centerpoint Mall (R) All Richmond Hill| Hillcrest Mall (R) C ▶ 2nd TA % N ▶ 3rd TA % Super Regional 100 100 Thornhill| CF Promenade (R) Regional Toronto| Fairview Mall (R) Community Neighbourhood Hillcrest Mall First Markham Place CF Promenade Centerpoint Mall Fairview Mall © 2019 Mapbox ©OpenStreetMap 1. Primary Trade Area Layers 1.1 The super-regional layer has the greatest consumer attraction, with the largest depth and breadth goods and services, particularily for shopping (durable) and many specialty goods. They generally have a GLA of over 800 sq ft with 3+ anchors. Super-regional layers typically carry convenience (non-durable) goods, which have a lower level of attraction then shopping and specialty goods. 1.2 The regional layer competes directly with the super-regional layer for shopping goods, but have slightly less attraction because of a reduced depth and breath. They consist of enclosed malls with a GLA of 400-800k sq ft and 2-3 anchors, or open-air centres with 3+ box stores with a GLA of 400-1,000 sq ft. 1.3 The community layer competes directly with the super-regional and regional layers for both shopping (durable) and convenience (non-durable) goods. -
GARDINER EXPRESSWAY and LAKE SHORE BOULEVARD EAST RECONFIGURATION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Infrastructure Baseline Conditions Report - 2014
GARDINER EXPRESSWAY AND LAKE SHORE BOULEVARD EAST RECONFIGURATION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Infrastructure Baseline Conditions Report - 2014 1 Gardiner Expressway and Lake Shore Blvd East Reconfiguration Environmental Assessment Infrastructure Baseline Conditions Report 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Study Area ........................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 STUDY METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................... 4 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING BASELINE CONDITIONS ........................................................................ 5 3.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 5 3.2 Road Infrastructure ............................................................................................................. 6 3.2.1 Gardiner Expressway Corridor ............................................................................... 6 3.2.2 Don Valley Parkway ............................................................................................. 15 3.2.3 Lake Shore Boulevard East Corridor .................................................................... 16 3.2.4 Roads and Streets ............................................................................................... -
Upper Canada Railway Society B Ox 12 2 Stat Io N " A" T O R O Nto, Ontario *
INCORPORATED 1952 NUMBER 472 FEBRUARY 1989 UPPER CANADA RAILWAY SOCIETY B OX 12 2 STAT IO N " A" T O R O NTO, ONTARIO *-- This business car, the NORTHERN LIGHTS, was photographed in April, 1988 at the Lantic Sugar Co. siding adjacent to VIA's Toronto Maintenance Facility. It is owned by Private Rail Inc., and was formerly Chicago, Burlington & Quincy 4, the ROUNDUP and MISSISSIPPI, buiit in 1915 and rebuilt in 1934. The car is now numbered 15111. —John D. Thompson photo The TTC Harbourfront LRT Line Union Station Loop awaits track and over• head installation in this January, 1989 view. The opening at right leads to the mezzanine of Union Station on the Yonge Subway. —photo by Ted Wickson, TTC A GMD plant switcher moves a gleaming new Norfolk Southern unit, 6657, across a road outside the plant on Dec. 11, 1988. —John E. Parneii photo February 1989 UCRS News 3 • r etter TorontoTransit Commission MEETING HATF November 29 . 1988 3 Hovember 22 , . 1988 ^^^^^^ DATE. .REPORT NO.. 18 M8R[ RERUILDS In 1S85 Metro Council requested the Commission to investigate the feasibility of rebuilding some of the aging PCC streetcars for use on the Harbourfront and Spadina LRT Lines. At its meehing of August 27, 1985, the Commission approved the use of ten' existing. CLRV's for service on the Harbourfront Line and the Rebuild of one PCC car by outside forces to ascertain whether or not the rebuild of sufficient PCCs to operate the Spadina Line can,be economically justified. Subsequently, at its meeting on February 11, 198 6, the Commission approved, the award of a contract to U.T.D.C. -
Negotiating Toronto's Vietnamese
EATING VERSUS SELLING AUTHENTICITY: NEGOTIATING TORONTO’S VIETNAMESE CULINARY LANDSCAPE BY NANCY HUYNH A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE PROGRAM IN THE DEPARTMENT OF GEOGRAPHY IN CONFORMITY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS QUEEN’S UNIVERSITY KINGSTON, ONTARIO, CANADA OCTOBER 2012 COPYRIGHT © NANCY HUYNH, 2012 ABSTRACT Despite the popularity of Vietnamese cuisine in Toronto, there is limited understanding of how this culinary cuisine is socially constructed through its consumption and production. This thesis research examines the production of Toronto’s Vietnamese culinary landscape with the aim of unpacking the discursive power relations between consumers’ and purveyors’ construction of authenticity through the processes of racialization. It also highlights the identities created through racialized consumption and production practices, and how such identity constructions are constitutive of Vietnamese culinary culture. To this aim, consumers were surveyed and in‐depth interviews were conducted with owners and managers. Results from the fieldwork process demonstrated that both consumers and producers construct authenticity and images of Vietnamese culture for their own benefits but had different, and sometimes confounding, understandings of how such constructions are interpreted and practiced. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Dr. Audrey Kobayashi for her advisement through the research and writing processes of this thesis. Her commitment and mentorship helped me through the up and downs of each stage of the Master’s program and was influential to my completion of this thesis. A thank you to my examining committee, Dr. Heather Nicol, Dr. Laura Cameron, Dr. Petra Fachinger, and Dr. Audrey Kobayashi, for their helpful and thought‐provoking comments, questions, and suggestions. -
Toronto 5 Why Learn English in Toronto? 8 10 Ways to Practise Your English in Toronto 11 1
www.ecenglish.com | 1 Contents DISCLAIMER 4 HOW TO USE THIS GUIDE 4 WELCOME TO TORONTO 5 WHY LEARN ENGLISH IN TORONTO? 8 10 WAYS TO PRACTISE YOUR ENGLISH IN TORONTO 11 1. Find the hidden gem on the 5th floor of the Toronto Reference Library 12 2. Join an English conversation circle 12 3. Go on an art tour at the University of Toronto 13 4. Watch a movie in unique surroundings 13 5. Shop at St. Lawrence’s Market 13 6. Go to a live concert 14 7. Order up at the restaurant 14 8. Go on a street-art tour 14 9. Go to the Islands 15 10. Read and watch CTV 15 WHAT TO SEE & EXPERIENCE IN THE “QUEEN CITY” 16 CN TOWER 17 ROGERS CENTRE 19 TORONTO CITY HALL 21 RIPLEY’S AQUARIUM OF CANADA 23 TORONTO ZOO 24 GRAFFITI ALLEY 27 THE LOCAL TORONTO 31 Eat and drink on patios 32 Eat and shop at Kensington Market 32 Eat from a food truck 33 Attend a festival or event 33 Have brunch at the weekend 34 TOP 10 THINGS TO DO IN TORONTO 35 1. Dance with dinosaurs 36 2. Go to a live music performance 36 3. Go to the Islands 37 4. Sample some Craft Beer 37 5. Go on a food tour 38 6. Go to the Beach 38 www.ecenglish.com | 2 7. Catch a sports game 39 8. Travel on a streetcar 40 9. Play Bubble Soccer 40 10. Go to beaches 40 SURVIVAL GUIDE 41 Getting to Toronto 42 Getting around Toronto 42 Fun & useful info about Toronto 44 Emergency Phone Numbers 44 Useful Links 45 Useful Apps 46 Final Tips 46 www.ecenglish.com | 3 DISCLAIMER Whilst all efforts have been made by the author to ensure that the information herein is accurate at the time of writing, the reader is advised to double check the information at the time of travel to ensure it is still relevant. -
Festivals, Festival Foods, and Dietary Acculturation: a Journey of Hybridization and Identity Formation for Chinese International Students in Ottawa
FESTIVALS, FESTIVAL FOODS, AND DIETARY ACCULTURATION: A JOURNEY OF HYBRIDIZATION AND IDENTITY FORMATION FOR CHINESE INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN OTTAWA By Shihan Liu A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Communication and Media Studies Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario © Shihan Liu, 2019 ABSTRACT Through participant observation at the 2018 Ottawa Night Market Chinatown and interviews with fifteen post-secondary Chinese international students in Ottawa about their dietary acculturation, this research aims to answer the following questions: How does hybridity play out in Chinese students’ dietary acculturation? What are the impacts of festivals and festival foods on hybridization and identity formation? The findings suggest that Chinese students do become more “hybrid” in their food practices, but this is less so from incorporating Canadian food habits, and more a result of increased consumption of various Chinese regional cuisines and Asian cuisines. However, becoming more hybrid does not weaken the participants’ Chinese identity; rather they retain it through attending the Night Market, celebrating traditional Chinese festivals, and maintaining cultural beliefs related to food choices, health and nutrition. This study suggests that hybridization involves multi-cultural and multi-dimensional influences, and confirms that hybridization is distinct from identity formation. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My journey of dietary acculturation and ethnic identity all started about three years ago when I met Dr. Irena Knezevic in her Food and Communication class. The short documentary that I made for the class assignment named One Day gave an insight into the lives of two Chinese students, who were also my friends at Carleton. -
Innovative Design Competition for Toronto's Central Waterfront
Innovative Design Competition for Toronto’s Central Waterfront Backgrounder The Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation (TWRC), in partnership with the Government of Canada, Province of Ontario and the City of Toronto held a six-week Innovative Design Competition to bring a fresh new perspective to Toronto’s 3.5 kilometre-long central waterfront, one of the most heavily used parts of the shoreline and the one closest to the city’s downtown. The design competition includes the area from Bathurst Street in the west to Parliament Street in the east. The objective of the competition was to connect and build on existing successful outdoor spaces like the Music Garden, the York and John Quay promenades and HtO Park, as well as to provide a distinct and recognizable identity for Toronto’s revitalized waterfront. Key criteria that the jury used to select the winning design includes: • Continuous public promenade from the Western Gap to the Parliament Street Slip • Completion of Martin Goodman Trail in this area • Creation of major points of arrival where the heads of slips meet Queens Quay • Improved Queens Quay Boulevard • Consistent standards for finishes, furniture, pavers, boardwalks and railings • Sustainable approach that includes habitat and water quality improvements 2006 Competition Process: • February - TWRC issues international request for qualifications. Thirty-eight design teams from 15 countries on four continents submitted respond to the RFQ. • March - TWRC short lists five firms and officially launches competition with an -
Rapid Transit in Toronto Levyrapidtransit.Ca TABLE of CONTENTS
The Neptis Foundation has collaborated with Edward J. Levy to publish this history of rapid transit proposals for the City of Toronto. Given Neptis’s focus on regional issues, we have supported Levy’s work because it demon- strates clearly that regional rapid transit cannot function eff ectively without a well-designed network at the core of the region. Toronto does not yet have such a network, as you will discover through the maps and historical photographs in this interactive web-book. We hope the material will contribute to ongoing debates on the need to create such a network. This web-book would not been produced without the vital eff orts of Philippa Campsie and Brent Gilliard, who have worked with Mr. Levy over two years to organize, edit, and present the volumes of text and illustrations. 1 Rapid Transit in Toronto levyrapidtransit.ca TABLE OF CONTENTS 6 INTRODUCTION 7 About this Book 9 Edward J. Levy 11 A Note from the Neptis Foundation 13 Author’s Note 16 Author’s Guiding Principle: The Need for a Network 18 Executive Summary 24 PART ONE: EARLY PLANNING FOR RAPID TRANSIT 1909 – 1945 CHAPTER 1: THE BEGINNING OF RAPID TRANSIT PLANNING IN TORONTO 25 1.0 Summary 26 1.1 The Story Begins 29 1.2 The First Subway Proposal 32 1.3 The Jacobs & Davies Report: Prescient but Premature 34 1.4 Putting the Proposal in Context CHAPTER 2: “The Rapid Transit System of the Future” and a Look Ahead, 1911 – 1913 36 2.0 Summary 37 2.1 The Evolving Vision, 1911 40 2.2 The Arnold Report: The Subway Alternative, 1912 44 2.3 Crossing the Valley CHAPTER 3: R.C. -
TTC Typography History
With the exception of Eglinton Station, 11 of the 12 stations of The intention of using Helvetica and Univers is unknown, however The Toronto Subway Font (Designer Unknown) the original Yonge Subway line have been renovated extensively. with the usage of the latter on the design of the Spadina Subway in Based on Futura by Paul Renner (1928) Some stations retained the original typefaces but with tighter 1978, it may have been an internal decision to try and assimilate tracking and subtle differences in weight, while other stations subsequent renovations of existing stations in the aging Yonge and were renovated so poorly there no longer is a sense of simplicity University lines. The TTC avoided the usage of the Toronto Subway seen with the 1954 designs in terms of typographical harmony. font on new subway stations for over two decades. ABCabc RQKS Queen Station, for example, used Helvetica (LT Std 75 Bold) in such The Sheppard Subway in 2002 saw the return of the Toronto Subway an irresponsible manner; it is repulsively inconsistent with all the typeface as it is used for the names of the stations posted on ABCabc RQKS other stations, and due to the renovators preserving the original platfrom level. Helvetica became the primary typeface for all TTC There are subtle differences between the two typefaces, notably the glass tile trim, the font weight itself looks botched and unsuitable. wayfinding signages and informational material system-wide. R, Q, K, and S; most have different terminals, spines, and junctions. ST CLAIR SUMMERHILL BLOOR DANGER DA N GER Danger DO NOT ENTER Do Not Enter Do Not Enter DAVISVILLE ST CL AIR SUMMERHILL ROSEDALE BLOOR EGLINTON DAVISVILLE ST CLAIR SUMMERHILL ROSEDALE BLOOR EGLINTON DAVISVILLE ST CLAIR SUMMERHILL ROSEDALE BLOOR The specially-designed Toronto Subway that embodied the spirit of modernism and replaced with a brutal mix of Helvetica and YONGE SUBWAY typeface graced the walls of the 12 stations, progress. -
5 Important Reasons to Join BVA!
Membership 5 Important Reasons to join BVA! Over the years, many of the resident members of the Bayview Village Association (“BVA”) have shared stories with the Association leadership about how they bought their first home in spring 2014. They had saved long and hard to move into an “established” neighbourhood with great schools and ample parkland with vast ravines to walk their pets. You would be amazed at how much research buyers and new entrants into our neighbourhood do beforehand — checking out crime watch and open blogs, drove by at different times of the day and, of course, chatted with the neighbours. Our newer residents state that, most often, the neighbours really sealed the deal for them. “We were moving into a neighbourhood with a highly active and energized neighbourhood association. We signed the last piece of paperwork and immediately jumped into all things neighbourly, and that included joining our neighbourhood association”. If you think these associations aren’t for you, or you are unsure on how you can contribute to your own neighbourhood, I urge you to think about the following: 1. Good Neighbours Equal Good Neighbourhoods When you gather a group of people interested in bettering their neighbourhood, I am pretty confident good things will come your way. While most neighbours are interested in preventing crime, some are interested in clean public parks and open areas or more street lighting. All of these personal agendas make for a diverse to-do list. When it becomes personal, the vested interest grows stronger within the group. “The neighbourhood BVA is that ‘just right’ level of engagement — large enough to take me outside of my individual concerns but small enough to really get to know people and tackle issues head on,” says a current Bayview Village owner/resident. -
1325 Bayview Avenue (PDF)
Conservation Review Commission des biens Board culturels 655 Bay Street 655 rue Bay suite 1500 bureau 1500 Toronto ON M5G 1E5 Toronto ON M5G 1E5 Telephone: (416) 326-3594 Téléphone: (416) 326-3594 Fax: (416) 326-6209 Télécopieur: (416) 326-6209 Web Site: www.crb.gov.on.ca Site Web: www.crb.gov.on.ca CRB 2007-14 CONSERVATION REVIEW BOARD RE: THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF TORONTO – INTENTION TO DESIGNATE THE PROPERTIES KNOWN AS 1325 BAYVIEW AVENUE (GLEN- LEVEN APTS.), 1351 BAYVIEW AVENUE (STRATHAVON APTS.), AND 1365 BAYVIEW AVENUE (KELVINGROVE APTS.), IN THE CITY OF TORONTO, ONTARIO Su Murdoch, Chair Terry Moynihan, Member This hearing was convened under s.29(8) of the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter O.18, amended to 2006 (“Act”), for the purpose of reporting to the Council of the City of Toronto, Ontario (“City”), whether, in the opinion of the Conservation Review Board, on the basis of the evidence it heard, the properties known as 1325, 1351, and 1365 Bayview Avenue should be protected by bylaws under s.29 of the Act. These three properties front on the east side of Bayview Avenue, north from Sutherland Drive. The current legal description for the three parcels of land is Lots 1-5, 48-51, and 9-20 Plan 2880; and Lots 5-8 and 79 Plan 2122, Borough of East York (Leaside community), now the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto. The 2008 (current) owner is ADMNS Kelvingrove Investment Corporation. The Board held one pre-hearing conference on this matter on July 7, 2008.