DOCSLIB.ORG

Using Time-Lapse and Stroboscopic Photography to Enhance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Using Time-Lapse and Stroboscopic Photography to Enhance Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2007 Using time-lapse and stroboscopic photography to enhance student understanding of plant growth, structure, and pollination: an inquiry-based study Louis John Schultz Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Education Commons Recommended Citation Schultz, Louis John, "Using time-lapse and stroboscopic photography to enhance student understanding of plant growth, structure, and pollination: an inquiry-based study" (2007). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 676. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/676 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. USING TIME-LAPSE AND STROBOSCOPIC PHOTOGRAPHY TO ENHANCE STUDENT UNDERSTANDING OF PLANT GROWTH, STRUCTURE, AND POLLINATION: AN INQUIRY-BASED STUDY A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In The Department of Educational Theory, Policy, & Practice By Louis J. Schultz, Sr. B.S.M.A.E., Oklahoma State University, 1970 B.S., Southeastern Louisiana University, 1974 M.Ed., Southeastern Louisiana University, 1976 Ed.S., Louisiana State University, 1999 May 2007 ©Copyright 2007 Louis J. Schultz, Sr. All right reserved ii DEDICATION To my mother Elizabeth N. Perkins and The memory of my mother-in-law, Josie Carreca. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The accomplishment of something significant is rarely the work of an individual. I would have never reached this point without the undying support of family, friends, and mentors. I could never adequately express my appreciation to my wife Mary Ann, who has always been there to support me in this endeavor. It would have been impossible without her. A special thanks to my children, grandchildren, and mother for their support. A special thank you goes out to Brandi and Daniel for being my test subjects when I needed them and my sister Betty for her help in constructing the black room. I would like to give special thanks to Dr. Melinda Holt and Dr. Brenda Nixon for sharing their time and expertise in all phases of this project and the students and staff at my research school for their cooperation and encouragement. Finally, I would like to thank Dr. James Wandersee without whose mentoring this would have been impossible. His philosophy of increasing ones own knowledge and at the same time sharing that knowledge with others will always be a part of me. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION............................................................................................................................... iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS........................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES....................................................................................................................... viii LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................... ix ABSTRACT.....................................................................................................................................x INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................1 Historical Aspects of Scientific Images...........................................................................................1 Multiple Images ...............................................................................................................................2 Technological Changes in Imaging .................................................................................................4 Stroboscopic Photography ...............................................................................................................5 Motion Pictures................................................................................................................................5 Slow Motion.....................................................................................................................................7 Time-Lapse Photography.................................................................................................................7 Images and Learning........................................................................................................................9 Major Learning Paradigms ..............................................................................................................9 Scientific Literacy..........................................................................................................................11 Botany and Science Education.......................................................................................................12 Rationale for the Study ..................................................................................................................13 Research Questions........................................................................................................................15 Definition of Terms........................................................................................................................16 Gowin Vee .....................................................................................................................................17 LITERATURE REVIEW ..............................................................................................................18 Early Scientific Images..................................................................................................................18 Multiple Images .............................................................................................................................22 Hand Sketches................................................................................................................................23 Technological Changes and Images...............................................................................................24 Stroboscopic Photography ..........................................................................................................25 Early Attempts at Motion............................................................................................................26 First Motion Picture ....................................................................................................................27 High Speed Photography and Motion Pictures...........................................................................28 Time-Lapse Photography............................................................................................................29 Visual Cognition ............................................................................................................................30 Learning Paradigms .......................................................................................................................33 Humanism...................................................................................................................................34 Behaviorism ................................................................................................................................35 Cognitism....................................................................................................................................36 Constructivism ............................................................................................................................36 v Human Constructivism ...............................................................................................................36 METHODS AND MATERIALS...................................................................................................39 Sample............................................................................................................................................39 Institutional Review Board ............................................................................................................40 Focus of the Study .........................................................................................................................41 Protocols ........................................................................................................................................42 Materials ........................................................................................................................................42 Amaryllis Bulbs ..........................................................................................................................43 Daylilies ......................................................................................................................................44 Tree Seeds...................................................................................................................................44 Dark Room..................................................................................................................................45
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Animation: Types
    Animation: Animation is a dynamic medium in which images or objects are manipulated to appear as moving images. In traditional animation, images are drawn or painted by hand on transparent celluloid sheets to be photographed and exhibited on film. Today most animations are made with computer generated (CGI). Commonly the effect of animation is achieved by a rapid succession of sequential images that minimally differ from each other. Apart from short films, feature films, animated gifs and other media dedicated to the display moving images, animation is also heavily used for video games, motion graphics and special effects. The history of animation started long before the development of cinematography. Humans have probably attempted to depict motion as far back as the Paleolithic period. Shadow play and the magic lantern offered popular shows with moving images as the result of manipulation by hand and/or some minor mechanics Computer animation has become popular since toy story (1995), the first feature-length animated film completely made using this technique. Types: Traditional animation (also called cel animation or hand-drawn animation) was the process used for most animated films of the 20th century. The individual frames of a traditionally animated film are photographs of drawings, first drawn on paper. To create the illusion of movement, each drawing differs slightly from the one before it. The animators' drawings are traced or photocopied onto transparent acetate sheets called cels which are filled in with paints in assigned colors or tones on the side opposite the line drawings. The completed character cels are photographed one-by-one against a painted background by rostrum camera onto motion picture film.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Examples of Early Animation
    Sabine Fox, 21101363 Introduction Animation first started out as still drawings, such as in cave paintings, which depicted animals or humans with multiple sets of legs, giving the illusion of movement. There has also been an ancient bowl found in Iran which features sequential images of a goat leaping to a tree. When putting animation into context of portraying actual movement by using mechanisms and sequential images, the earliest known animation was created for devices of Chinese inventor Ting Huan in 180 AD. The device was an earlier version of the zoetrope, where it held a series of drawings that rotated when the device was suspended over a lamp. When rotated at the right speed, it created an illusion of movement. Examples of early animation Thaumatrope, 1826, created by English physician John Ayrton Paris. -- It consisted of a disc with two images on opposite sides that merged together when the disc was quickly spun using strings. An example is a bird on one side and a cage on the other. In 1831 Joseph Plateau created the phenakistiscope -- a wheel that had slits around the edge. Under each slit were images on a paper slip that are almost similar to one another, and when the wheel is spun facing the mirror, the images appear to move. The zoetrope, designed by William George Homer in 1834 but wasn’t widely used until 1867. The device was similar to how the phenakistiscope worked -- did not require a mirror to see the images and was moved by turning the cylinder around. It also allowed for the images to be changed, which wasn’t possible with the phenakistiscope.
    [Show full text]
  • The Plateau Exhibition in Ghent 2001
    The Plateau Exhibition in Ghent 2001 By Ron Holloway Spring 2002 Issue of KINEMA THE PLATEAU EXHIBITION AT THE SCIENCE MUSEUM IN GHENT 2001 Film historians with a tick for the archaeology of the cinema are well advised to pay a visit to the Museum of Science in Ghent to view the exhibition honouring the 200th birthday of Belgian scientist Joseph Plateau. It was Plateau’s experiments on optical deception and the persistence of vision in the middle of the 19th century that led to the invention of the anorthoscope (distorted view) and the phenakistiscope (deceitful view), the direct precursors of the first moving picture inventions. The entire range of related optical inventions the stroboscope (whirling view), the thaumatrope (magical turning), and zoetrope (life turning), to name just the key scientific discoveries that led to cinematography were placed on mechanically driven display atthe opening of the 28th Flanders International Film Festival in Ghent (8-18 October 2001). Visitors to the Flanders festival were also presented with an invaluable catalogue to accompany the exhibition: ”Joseph Plateau, (1801-1883) Living Between Art and Science” (Gent: Provincie Oost-Vlaanderen, 2001) by Maurice Dorikens, with additional essays by David Robinson, Laurent Mannoni, and Giusy Pisno-Basile. Robinson’s contribution on ”Plateau, Faraday and Their Spinning Discs” focuses on the fruitful competition between Joseph Plateau in Belgium and Michael Faraday in England on experiments relating to optical deception. Plateau won that race by a few months to perfect the anorthoscope in 1936, a concession readily made by Faraday upon reading the Belgian scientist’s published papers.
    [Show full text]
  • Proto-Cinematic Narrative in Nineteenth-Century British Fiction
    The University of Southern Mississippi The Aquila Digital Community Dissertations Fall 12-2016 Moving Words/Motion Pictures: Proto-Cinematic Narrative In Nineteenth-Century British Fiction Kara Marie Manning University of Southern Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations Part of the Literature in English, British Isles Commons, and the Other Film and Media Studies Commons Recommended Citation Manning, Kara Marie, "Moving Words/Motion Pictures: Proto-Cinematic Narrative In Nineteenth-Century British Fiction" (2016). Dissertations. 906. https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations/906 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MOVING WORDS/MOTION PICTURES: PROTO-CINEMATIC NARRATIVE IN NINETEENTH-CENTURY BRITISH FICTION by Kara Marie Manning A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School and the Department of English at The University of Southern Mississippi in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Approved: ________________________________________________ Dr. Eric L.Tribunella, Committee Chair Associate Professor, English ________________________________________________ Dr. Monika Gehlawat, Committee Member Associate Professor, English ________________________________________________ Dr. Phillip Gentile, Committee Member Assistant Professor,
    [Show full text]
  • Two Discs from Fores's Moving Panorama. Phenakistiscope Discs
    Frames per second / Pre-cinema, Cinema, Video / Illustrated catalogue at www.paperbooks.ca/26 01 Fores, Samuel William Two discs from Fores’s moving panorama. London: S. W. Fores, 41 Piccadily, 1833. Two separate discs; with vibrantly-coloured lithographic images on circular card-stock (with diameters of 23 cm.). Both discs featuring two-tier narratives; the first, with festive subject of music and drinking/dancing (with 10 images and 10 apertures), the second featuring a chap in Tam o' shanter, jumping over a ball and performing a jig (with 12 images and 12 apertures). £ 350 each (w/ modern facsimile handle available for additional £ 120) Being some of the earliest pre-cinema devices—most often attributed either to either Joseph Plateau of Belgium or the Austrian Stampfer, circa 1832—phenakistiscopes (sometimes called fantascopes) functioned as indirect media, requiring a mirror through which to view the rotating discs, with the discrete illustrations activated into a singular animation through the interruption-pattern produced by the set of punched apertures. The early discs offered here were issued from the Piccadily premises of Samuel William Fores (1761-1838)—not long after Ackermann first introduced the format into London. Fores had already become prolific in the publishing and marketing of caricatures, and was here trying to leverage his expertise for the newest form of popular entertainment, with his Fores’s moving panorama. 02 Anonymous Phenakistiscope discs. [Germany?], circa 1840s. Four engraved card discs (diameters avg. 18
    [Show full text]
  • THE PUBLIC EXHIBITION of MOVING PICTURES BEFORE 1896 by Deac Rossell
    THE PUBLIC EXHIBITION OF MOVING PICTURES BEFORE 1896 by Deac Rossell [Pre-publication English-language text later published in slightly altered form in KINtop: Jahrbuch zur Erforschung des frühen Films, 14/15 (Frankfurt am Main/Basle, 2006: Stroemfeld/Roter Stern)] Part 1: Choosing a different perspective This article is an attempt to refresh our ideas of how moving pictures were invented and first seen. It is also an attempt to find one new way — of many possible ways — of discussing the earliest moving pictures, and in so doing to think again about which inventors or pioneers were significant in developing moving image culture. A fresh look at the period of invention before 1896, particularly one that is frank and open about its assumptions and methodology, and one that incorporates recent scholarship from all of Europe as well as America, can help to illuminate the work of some figures who have been poorly served – or even wholly ignored – in the received version of the history of the invention of moving pictures. As an appendix to the main text, but as a crucial element of this recast narrative, a chronology noting specific moving picture exhibitions forms Part 3 of this essay. Why is an article about the earliest public exhibition of moving pictures necessary? What new shapes does it bring to the story of the invention of the cinema as it is usually written? This story is usually conceived as a narrative about technology; indeed, the very use of the word “invention” popularly implies some ingenious arrangement of mechanical elements to produce a wholly new effect or process.
    [Show full text]
  • Forms of Machines, Forms of Movement
    Forms of Machines, Forms of Movement Benoît Turquety for Hadrien Fac-similes In a documentary produced in 1996-1997, American filmmaker Stan Bra- khage, who spent much of his life painting and scratching film, stated that One of the major things in film is that you have 24 beats in a second, or 16 beats or whatever speed the projector is running at. It is a medium that has a base beat, that is intrinsically baroque. And aesthetically speaking, it’s just appalling to me to try to watch, for example, as I did, Eisenstein’s Battleship Potemkin on video: it dulls all the rhythm of the editing. Because video looks, in comparison to the sharp, hard clarities of snapping individual frames, and what that produces at the cut, video looks like a pudding, that’s virtually uncuttable, like a jello. It’s all ashake with itself. And furthermore, as a colorist, it doesn’t interest me, because it is whatever color anyone sets their receptor to. It has no fixed color.1 Each optical machine produces a specific mode of perception. Canadian filmmaker Norman McLaren also devoted an essential part of his work to research on the material of film itself, making films with or without camera through all kinds of methods, drawing, painting, scratching film, develop- ing a reflection on what a film frame is and what happens in the interval between two images. Yet today his work is distributed by the National Film Board of Canada only in digital format, and such prestigious institutions as the Centre Pompidou in Paris project it that way – even as the compression of digital files required by their transfer on DVD pretty much abolishes the fundamental cell that is the single frame.
    [Show full text]
  • The Experimental Origins of Cinema and Stereo
    University of Dundee Capturing Motion and Depth before Cinematography Wade, Nicholas J. Published in: Journal of the History of the Neurosciences DOI: 10.1080/0964704X.2015.1070029 Publication date: 2016 Document Version Peer reviewed version Link to publication in Discovery Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Wade, N. J. (2016). Capturing Motion and Depth before Cinematography. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 25(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964704X.2015.1070029 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in Discovery Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from Discovery Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain. • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 07. Oct. 2021 Capturing motion and depth before cinematography Nicholas J. Wade, School of Psychology, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, Scotland. Tel: +44 3182 384616 E-mail: [email protected] Running head: motion and depth This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of the history of the neurosciences, January 2016, available online: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1080/0964704X.2015.1070029 1 ABSTRACT Visual representations of biological states have traditionally faced two problems: they lacked motion and depth.
    [Show full text]
  • Mid-Victorian Fiction and Moving-Image Technologies
    Durham E-Theses The Eye in Motion: Mid-Victorian Fiction and Moving-Image Technologies BUSH, NICOLE,SAMANTHA How to cite: BUSH, NICOLE,SAMANTHA (2015) The Eye in Motion: Mid-Victorian Fiction and Moving-Image Technologies , Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/11124/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 The Eye in Motion: Mid-Victorian Fiction and Moving-Image Technologies Nicole Bush Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of English Studies Durham University January 2015 Abstract This thesis reads selected works of fiction by three mid-Victorian writers (Charlotte Brontë, Charles Dickens, and George Eliot) alongside contemporaneous innovations and developments in moving-image technologies, or what have been referred to by historians of film as ‘pre-cinematic devices’.
    [Show full text]
  • Rembrandt, the Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Nicolas Tulp
    86 REMBRANDT, THE ANATOMY LESSON OF DR. NICOLAS TULP (1632) AN EROTICS OF SPACE: THE CINEMATIC APPARATUS IN THE AURA OF SCIENCE JANINE MARCHESSAULT That the destruction ofan illusion does not 87 produce truth but only one more piece ofignorance, an extension ofour "empty space," an increase of our "desert"- Nietzsche - The year is 1632. Eight men of science stand around an anatomy table. The body of a petty tbief from Leyden is stretcbed out in front of them, lifeless. Except for a cloth draped over its genitals, the male body is exposed-open to tbe gaze; its left arm appears partially dissected, the skin pulled back to reveal a greenish mass of muscle tissue. Aris Kindt pays retribution to the society he has wronged; beyond bis death he becomes the servicing agent for a nascent Enlightenment. The scene is famous. Rembrandt's moribund painting The Anatomy Lesson ofDr. Nicolaas Tulp depicts the ceremonial penetration of death in the name of a science which seeks to multiply the order of it's reasoning. l Endeavoring to know death by making it's body clear and distinct, the reputed surgeon Tulp extends the previous public execution to the spectacle of science. The Anatomy Lesson documents an important shift in the relation between power and life ("power over life") in the West. One which Foucault identifies as a shift from the sover­ eign right to administer death to a life-administering power: "a power bent on generating forces, making them grow, and ordering them, rather than one dedicated to impeding them, making them submit, or destroying them"2.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Computer Animation 3/20/92 1
    tea:1 i20SZ bu :J1, Chapter 4 : A HISTORY OF COMPUTER ANIMATION 3/20/92 1 A History of Computer Animation . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .1 The Origins of Animation . .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..1 Animated phase pictures and roll media (1828- 1895) . .. .. .. .. .......... .. .. .. ................. ..........1 The early trickfilmsters and technology (1895- 1909) . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ............ .. .. ............. ...2 The animation studio and techniques (1910-1920) . .5 The Classical Period (1920-1960) . .. 1 0 The Origins of the Computer . ............................ .. .. .. .. .. ...... .. ..14 Analog computers.... .. ... .. ... ... .. .. .. .. ... .. .. ..14 Digital computers . .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .............. .. .. .. .. ..16 Analog Computer Animation .... .. .. .. .. ............... ..21 Electronic Analog Computer Animation . .. .. .. ............. .21 Mechanical Analog Computer Animation . .. ..... ...... .. .23 Computerizating the Animation Stand and Optical Printer. .. .... ... .. ..... .. .... ..... .... ... .. .. .. ... .2 7 Benefits of Computer Animation Stand . .2 9 Motion Control . .............. .. .. .. .. .. ........ .. .. ..3 0 Benefits of Computerized Motion Control .............. .. .... .. .32 Synthetic Imagery. .. .. ... .. ... ... .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .3 3 Computer hardware fusions. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..3 3 The interactive cathode ray tube display. .3 3 The mechanical plotter. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .3 5 Film recorder CRT's. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. .. .. ..
    [Show full text]
  • History of Motion Pictures
    MARK FREEMAN Encyclopedia of Science, Technology and Society http://www.factsonfile.com/newfacts/FactsDetail.asp?PageValue=B ooks&SIDText=0816031231&LeftID=0 HISTORY OF MOTION PICTURES The technology that made possible the projection and exhibition of photographed moving images is just 100 years old. In 1895 in Europe and North America the moment was ripe for a diverse group of engineers, scientists, eccentrics and inventors to nearly simultaneously create cameras and projectors capable of photographing and displaying motion pictures. Yet this invention ----the technology itself---is not equivalent to "The Movies." Cinema as we know it is an economically, socially and culturally defined mass entertainment. An interest in projected entertainments was not solely a Western one. For example, (puppet) shadow theater is common to many traditions including Turkey, Java, India and China. [Illustration] The technological roots of moving pictures can be traced to the camera obscura---a roomsize pinhole camera which projects an upside-down view of an exterior scene on an opposite interior wall. [Illustration] The principles of this device were first recorded in the 11th century in Egypt by Ibn al Haitam. The magic lantern --- essentially a slide projector---was in use in Europe as early as 1646. By the 1790's Etienne Gaspard Robertson shocked and confounded Parisian audiences with his Fantasmagorie. He used magic lanterns to (rear) project images of the dead onto smoke in the darkened chapel of an abandoned monastery. The principles of photography were well established by Niepce and Daguerre by the 1830's. And the 19th century gave rise to a seemingly endless stream of Greek and Latin named inventions designed to simulate the appearance of motion in a series of still drawings and eventually photographs.
    [Show full text]