Messing with the Attractiveness Algorithm V8
Do not cite, quote, or reprint without permission. Instead, cite: Gieseking, Jen Jack. 2018. Messing with the Attractiveness Algorithm: a Response to Queering Code/Space. Gender, Place and Culture. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2017.1379955. Messing with the Attractiveness Algorithm: a Response to Queering Code/Space Jen Jack Gieseking American Studies, Trinity College ABSTRACT Responding to the collection of articles, “Queering Code/Space,” this article discusses how algorithms affect the production of online lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) spaces, namely online dating sites. The set of papers is well timed: lesbian bars have closed en masse across the US and many gay male bars have followed suit so that online spaces fill—or perhaps make—a gap in the social production of LGBTQ spaces. I draw on Cindi Katz’s idea of “messy” qualities of social reproduction and the necessity of “messing” with dominant narratives in order to think about the labor, experience, and project of queering code/space. KEYWORDS Queer, code, space, social media, social reproduction If I had not been dating on and off since the rise of internet dating, and if I didn’t study the lesbian and queer production of digital and material spaces (which often overlap), I would not have made sense of the years of frustration and anxiety I have heard among lesbian, queer, and trans (LQT) folks. At parties and bars, femme and feminine-presenting LQT people would say upon meeting me (a six foot, white, sizeable butch/trans dyke): “Why haven’t we met? Oh, because there are no butches and/or transmen (et al) on OkCupid.” In homes and on the street, butches, transmen, and masculine-presenting LQT people told me: “I can’t meet a girl.
[Show full text]