DOCSLIB.ORG

UFL/COEL-92/008 HISTORICAL SHORELINE RESPONSE to INLET MODIFICATIONS and SEA LEVEL RISE by Jonathan R. H. Grant Thesis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UFL/COEL-92/008 HISTORICAL SHORELINE RESPONSE to INLET MODIFICATIONS and SEA LEVEL RISE by Jonathan R. H. Grant Thesis Historical shoreline response to inlet modifications and sea level rise Item Type monograph Authors Grant, Jonathan R. H. Publisher University of Florida, Coastal and Oceanographic Engineering Department Download date 27/09/2021 03:50:54 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/18442 UFL/COEL-92/008 HISTORICAL SHORELINE RESPONSE TO INLET MODIFICATIONS AND SEA LEVEL RISE by Jonathan R. H. Grant Thesis May 1992 HISTORICAL SHORELINE RESPONSE TO INLET MODIFICATIONS AND SEA LEVEL RISE By JONATHAN R. H. GRANT A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1992 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Robert Dean, for all of his assistance and utmost patience in helping me complete this thesis. The assistance of my other committee members, Dr. Ashish Mehta and Dr. Daniel Hanes, is greatly appreciated. I would like to thank Cynthia Vey, Sandra Bivins, Becky Hudson, Helen Twedell and Sabarna Malakar for their patience, humor and help in transforming my research into a thesis. I would also like to thank all of the professors who have taught me so much outside of my research work. This work was sponsored by Florida Sea Grant, whose continued support of coastal re- search is appreciated. The data used in this study were supplied by the Florida Department of Natural Resources. Special thanks goes to Emmett Foster (of FDNR) for taking the time to help furnish the most up to date shoreline data. The salvation of my sanity is the result of all my friends in Gainesville, to whom I am indebted. Thanks to all my fellow Coastals: Steve, Sam (my initial tutor to graduate school), Paul, Phil D., Jei and Mike and especially Mark and Phil H. (of G. H. and Assoc.). Katia, Pete, Pete, Shannon and Annie are responsible for all my nonengineering, activities and their friendship and help in creating the Florida Four will never be forgotten. Finally, I would like to thank my brother, Dr. William "Boo" Grant for showing me that the ocean could be more than just a playground. I wish he could be here to see me accomplish that. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................ ii LIST OF FIGURES .................................... v LIST OF TABLES ...... ................................. xi ABSTRACT .................... ..................... xii CHAPTERS 1 INTRODUCTION ..................... ............ 1 1.1 Purpose of this Study ...... ............ ........... 1 1.2 Scope. ...................................... 2 2 APPROACH .................................... 7 2.1 Review of Available Data ........................... 7 2.2 Erosion at Inlets ................... ............. 9 2.2.1 Erosion at Modified Inlets .................... 10 2.2.2 The Updrift and Downdrift Extent of the Influence of Inlets . 14 2.3 Sea Level Rise ..... ... .......... ... .... 19 3 METHODOLOGY ................... ............... 23 3.1 Introduction .................... .............. 23 3.2 Shoreline Change Rates ............................ 23 3.2.1 Inlet Influenced Shoreline Segments . .... 24 3.2.2 The Coast of Florida ......................... 24 3.3 Sea Level Changes ............................. 25 4 RESULTS ...................................... 28 4.1 Introduction .................................... 28 4.2 East Coast Inlets ............................... 28 4.2.1 St. Augustine Inlet ................... ....... 28 4.2.2 Matanzas Inlet .................... ........... 32 4.2.3 Ponce de Leon Inlet ................... ....... 32 iii 4.2.4 Port Canaveral Entrance ....................... 36 4.2.5 Sebastian Inlet ............................ 40 4.2.6 Ft. Pierce Inlet ............................ 43 4.2.7 St. Lucie Inlet ... ... ... ..... ... ....... 47 4.2.8 Jupiter Inlet ....... ........ ... ... ..... .. 51 4.2.9 Lake Worth Inlet ................... ........ 54 4.2.10 South Lake Worth Inlet ....................... 57 4.2.11 Boca Raton Inlet .......................... 60 4.2.12 Hillsboro Inlet ................. ... ........ 63 4.2.13 Port Everglades Entrance . .. ... 67 4.2.14 Bakers Haulover Inlet ......................... 70 4.3 West Coast Inlets ............................... 73 4.3.1 Pensacola Pass ............................ 73 4.3.2 East Pass (Destin Harbor) ...................... 75 4.3.3 St. Andrews Bay Entrance Channel (Panama City) . ... 79 4.3.4 Mexico Beach Inlet ................... ....... 83 4.3.5 Venice Inlet ................... .......... 83 4.4 Counties .................... .............. 88 4.4.1 East Coast ................... ... ......... 88 4.4.2 W est Coast .............................. 90 4.5 Florida's Coastline .............................. 90 4.6 Effects of Inlets ................... .............. 92 4.7 Sea Level Rise ................... ..... .......... 97 5 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ....................... 104 REFERENCES .................... ................ 107 APPENDIX ...................................... .. 110 A.1 Introduction ...................... ....... ......... 110 A.2 East Coast Counties ................... .......... 112 A.3 West Coast Counties ................... .......... 126 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH ................... ........... 140 iv LIST OF FIGURES 1.1 Location of inlets along the coast of Florida covered in this thesis in- cluding the location of tide gauges from which the sea level data were obtained. ... ........... ......... .. ... ..... 4 1.2 Location of counties examined in this thesis for shoreline change. 5 1.3 Approximate longshore sediment transport along the coast of Florida. 6 2.1 DNR monuments located in St. Johns County. 8 2.2 Longshore migration of a natural inlet. ... 11 2.3 Basic transfer process of sand at a natural inlet. ... 11 2.4 Shoreline changes due to placement of a shore normal littoral barrier. 13 2.5 Shoreline changes as a result of placing jetties at an inlet ........ 16 2.6 Definitions of the variables Ob, B, h. and . ... 20 3.1 Monthly mean sea level variations and long-term sea level data at the three locations on the east coast of Florida used in this study. Based on tide gauge data (from Hicks et al., 1983). .... 27 4.1 Historical shorelines for St. Augustine Inlet (from Marino, 1986). 30 4.2 Shoreline change rates before (1858-1937) and after (1943-1986) training St. Augustine Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. ... 31 4.3 Shoreline change rates before (1858-1924) and after (1937-1986) con- struction of the Rt. A1A bridge over Matanzas Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. ................... ... ........ .... 33 4.4 Shoreline change rates before (1873-1967) and after (1972-1989) training Ponce de Leon Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. .... 35 4.5 Ponce de Leon Inlet: South jetty alignment. Adapted from Jones and M ehta, 1978. .................. .............. 36 v 4.6 Shoreline change rates before (1874-1948) and after (1964-1986) training Port Canaveral. Change rates in feet per year. ... 38 4.7 Shoreline change rates for pre- (1964-1974) and post-nourishment (1976- 1986) of the south beach of Port Canaveral. The shoreline change rates for after training (see previous figure) are included for reference. Change rates in feet per year. ................... ......... 39 4.8 Historical shorelines for Sebastian Inlet. ... 41 4.9 Shoreline change rates after training (1948-1986) Sebastian Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. ................... ......... 42 4.10 Historical shorelines for Ft. Pierce Inlet. ..... 44 4.11 Shoreline change rates after training (1928-1987) Ft. Pierce Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. ................... ......... 45 4.12 Shoreline change rates for pre- (1928-1970) and post-nourishment (1972- 1987) of Ft. Pierce Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. ... 46 4.13 Historical shorelines for St. Lucie Inlet (from Marino, 1986). 49 4.14 Shoreline change rates after training (1928-1984) St. Lucie Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. ................... ......... 50 4.15 Historical shorelines for Jupiter Inlet. ... 52 4.16 Shoreline change rates after training (1927-1980) Jupiter Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. .... .......................... 53 4.17 Historical shorelines for Lake Worth Inlet. ... 55 4.18 Shoreline change rates after training (1928-1980) Lake Worth Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. Note that indicated downdrift accretion is due to recovery following south jetty construction. .... 56 4.19 South Lake Worth Inlet in 1969 ...................... 58 4.20 Shoreline change rates after training (1928-1980) South Lake Worth In- let. Change rates in feet per year. ..... 59 4.21 Historical shorelines for Boca Raton Inlet (from Marino, 1986) ... 61 4.22 Shoreline change rates after training (1942-1980) Boca Raton Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. ........... ...... .... ... 62 4.23 Hillsboro Inlet in 1967. ............................ 64 4.24 Shoreline change rates before (1883-1962) and after (1970-1985) jetty construction at Hillsboro Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. 65 vi 4.25 Shoreline change rates after construction (1935-1985) of initial training device (north rock groin) at Hillsboro Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. 66 4.26 Historical shorelines for Port Everglades Entrance. ... 68 4.27 Shoreline change rates after training (1935-1985) of Port Everglades En- trance. Change rates in feet per year. .... 69 4.28 Historical shorelines for Bakers Haulover Inlet. ... 71 4.29 Shoreline change rates after training (1927-1986) of Bakers Haulover Inlet. Downdrift shoreline includes
Load more

Recommended publications
  • USGS 7.5-Minute Image Map for Matanzas Inlet, Florida
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MATANZAS INLET QUADRANGLE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FLORIDA T9S 7.5-MINUTE SERIES 81°15' 12'30" 10' 81°07' 30" IntracoastalR30E4 000m Waterway 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 29°45' 76 E 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 610 000 FEET 86 87 29°45' 3291000mN 3291 FLORIDA 2 «¬A1 S Devils Elbow T . r J e O v H i R N S S s s 11 32 32 a C 90 90 z O n a t a M Anastasia Island 3289 3289 12 1 960 000 FEET «¬A1 3288 3288 T9S R30E 13 Fort 3287 Matanzas 3287 FORT MATANZAS NATIONAL MONUMENT 24 Imagery................................................NAIP, January 2010 Roads..............................................©2006-2010 Tele Atlas Names...............................................................GNIS, 2010 42'30" 42'30" Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2010 Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2010 Claude Varne ATLANTIC Bridge Matanzas Inlet OCEAN 3286 3286 DR RIA TA RA AR B G E N E E Rattlesnake J RD Summer Haven O SON Island HN OLD A1A J U N E E A1 32 32 L «¬ 85 85 N M a t a n z a s s R i v e r 3284 3284 3283 3283 ST. JOHNS CO FLAGLER CO «¬A1 3282 Intracoastal Waterway 3282 40' 40' Hemming Point N N O C E A N Marineland S H O R E E B r L V e D v i 32 R DEERWOOD ST 3281 81 2 s a BEACHSIDE DR k z e n e a r t C a r r M e SHADY OAK LN c i .
    [Show full text]
  • Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, Florida: Maintenance Dredging
    FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA, TO MIAMI, FLORIDA MAINTENANCE DREDGING Prepared by U. S. Army Engineer District, Jacksonville Jacksonville, Florida May 1974 INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY. JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI MAINTENANCE DREDGING ( ) Draft (X) Final Responsible Office: U. S. Army Engineer District, Jacksonville, Florida. 1. Name of Action: (X) Administrative ( ) Legislative 2. Description of Action: Eleven shoals are to be removed from this section of the Intracoastal Waterway as a part of the regular main­ tenance program. 3. a. Environmental Impacts. About 172,200 cubic yards of shoal material in the channel will be removed by hydraulic dredge and placed in diked upland areas and as nourishment on a county park beach south of Jupiter Inlet. b. Adverse Environmental Effects. Dredging will have a temporary adverse effect on water quality and will destroy benthic organisms in both the shoal material and on the beach. In addition, some turtle nests at the beach nourishment site may be destroyed. 4. Alternatives. Consideration was given to alternate methods of spoil disposal. It was determined that the methods selected (as described in paragraph 1) would best accomplish the purpose of the project while minimizing adverse impact on the environment. 5. Comments received on the draft statement in response to the 3 November 1972 coordination letter: Respondent Date of Comments U. S. Coast Guard 7 November 1972 U. S. Department of Agriculture 8 November 1972 Florida State Museum 8 November 1972 Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 14 November 1972 Florida Department of Transportation 20 November 1972 Florida Department of Natural Resources 30 November 1972 Environmental Protection Agency 8 December 1972 Florida G&FWFC 13 December 1972 U.
    [Show full text]
  • The Elkton Hastings Historic Farmstead Survey, St
    THE ELKTON HASTINGS HISTORIC FARMSTEAD SURVEY, ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FLORIDA Prepared For: St. Johns County Board of County Commissioners 2740 Industry Center Road St. Augustine, Florida 32084 May 2009 4104 St. Augustine Road Jacksonville, Florida 32207- 6609 www.bland.cc Bland & Associates, Inc. Archaeological and Historic Preservation Consultants Jacksonville, Florida Charleston, South Carolina Atlanta, Georgia THE ELKTON HASTINGS HISTORIC FARMSTEAD SURVEY, ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FLORIDA Prepared for: St. Johns County Board of County Commissioners St. Johns County Miscellaneous Contract (2008) By: Myles C. P. Bland, RPA and Sidney P. Johnston, MA BAIJ08010498.01 BAI Report of Investigations No. 415 May 2009 4104 St. Augustine Road Jacksonville, Florida 32207- 6609 www.bland.cc Bland & Associates, Inc. Archaeological and Historic Preservation Consultants Atlanta, Georgia Charleston, South Carolina Jacksonville, Florida MANAGEMENT SUMMARY This project was initiated in August of 2008 by Bland & Associates, Incorporated (BAI) of Jacksonville, Florida. The goal of this project was to identify and record a specific type of historic resource located within rural areas of St. Johns County in the general vicinity of Elkton and Hastings. This assessment was specifically designed to examine structures listed on the St. Johns County Property Appraiser’s website as being built prior to 1920. The survey excluded the area of incorporated Hastings. The survey goals were to develop a historic context for the farmhouses in the area, and to make an assessment of the farmhouses with an emphasis towards individual and thematic National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) potential. Florida Master Site File (FMSF) forms in a SMARTFORM II database format were completed on all newly surveyed structures, and updated on all previously recorded structures within the survey area.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Matanzas National Monument Digital Documentation Project:Â
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Digital Heritage and Humanities Collections Faculty and Staff Publications Tampa Library 8-2013 Fort Matanzas National Monument Digital Documentation Project: Utilizing Terrestrial Lidar For The Understanding Of Structural Integrity Concerns For Coastal Forts And Coquina Structures (Cesu,National Park Service) Lori D. Collins University of South Florida, [email protected] Travis F. Doering University of South Florida, [email protected] Jorge Gonzalez University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/dhhc_facpub Scholar Commons Citation Collins, Lori D.; Doering, Travis F.; and Gonzalez, Jorge, "Fort Matanzas National Monument Digital Documentation Project: Utilizing Terrestrial Lidar For The Understanding Of Structural Integrity Concerns For Coastal Forts And Coquina Structures (Cesu,National Park Service)" (2013). Digital Heritage and Humanities Collections Faculty and Staff Publications. 3. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/dhhc_facpub/3 This Technical Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Tampa Library at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Digital Heritage and Humanities Collections Faculty and Staff Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FORT MATANZAS NATIONAL MONUMENT DIGITAL DOCUMENTATION PROJECT: UTILIZING TERRESTRIAL LIDAR FOR THE UNDERSTANDING OF STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY CONCERNS FOR COASTAL FORTS AND COQUINA STRUCTURES (CESU, NATIONAL PARK SERVICE) LORI COLLINS, PH.D. AND TRAVIS DOERING, PH.D., 8/2013 CONTRIBUTIONS BY: JORGE GONZALEZ, STEVEN FERNANDEZ, JAMES MCLEOD, AND JOSEPH EVANS Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Dr. Margo Schwadron, Archeologist with the Southeast Archeological Center, who assisted with the planning, organizing, and implementation of this project and provided support, advice, and suggestions throughout the process.
    [Show full text]
  • National List of Beaches 2004 (PDF)
    National List of Beaches March 2004 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington DC 20460 EPA-823-R-04-004 i Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 States Alabama ............................................................................................................... 3 Alaska................................................................................................................... 6 California .............................................................................................................. 9 Connecticut .......................................................................................................... 17 Delaware .............................................................................................................. 21 Florida .................................................................................................................. 22 Georgia................................................................................................................. 36 Hawaii................................................................................................................... 38 Illinois ................................................................................................................... 45 Indiana.................................................................................................................. 47 Louisiana
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I: Critical Erosion Report 2018 State Hazard Mitigation Plan ______
    Appendix I: Critical Erosion Report 2018 State Hazard Mitigation Plan _______________________________________________________________________________________ APPENDIX I: Critical Erosion Report _______________________________________________________________________________________ Florida Division of Emergency Management Critically Eroded Beaches In Florida Division of Water Resource Management Florida Department of Environmental Protection August 2016 2600 Blair Stone Rd., MS 3590 Tallahassee, FL 32399-3000 www.dep.state.fl.us Foreword This report provides an inventory of Florida’s erosion problem areas fronting on the Atlantic Ocean, Straits of Florida, Gulf of Mexico, and the roughly sixty-six coastal barrier tidal inlets. The erosion problem areas are classified as either critical or non-critical and county maps and tables are provided to depict the areas designated critically and non-critically eroded. Many areas have significant historic or contemporary erosion conditions, yet the erosion processes do not currently threaten public or private interests. These areas are therefore designated as non-critically eroded areas and require close monitoring in case conditions become critical. This report, originating in 1989, is periodically updated to include additions and deletions. All information is provided for planning purposes only and the user is cautioned to obtain the most recent erosion areas listing available in the updated critical erosion report of 2016 on pages 4 through 20 or refer to the specific county of interest listed
    [Show full text]
  • EA IAA Cut DA-9 at Bakers Inlet
    CESAD-ET-CO-M (CESAJ-C0/21Jun97) (ll-2-240a) 1st End Mr. DeVeaux/ dsm/(404) 331-6742 SUBJECT: Advanced Maintenance Dredging of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (IWW) Jacksonville to Miami, in the Vicinity of Bakers Haulover Inlet, Dade County, Florida Commander, South Atlantic Division, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 77 Forsyth Street, S.W., Room 322, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3490 10 July 1997 FOR THE COMMANDER, JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT, ATTN: CESAJ-CO 1. Your request to perform advanced maintenance in subject channel is approved subject to completing all appropriate environmental documentation, coordination, and clearance. Approval of the Memorandum of Agreement with the Florida Inland Navigation District is also required. 2. You should continue to monitor the cost of maintenance to assure that the proposed advanced maintenance dredging results in the least costly method of maintaining the channel. FOR THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SERVICES: ~&Peei JR., PE~ . Chief, Construction-Operations ~ Directorate of Engineering and Technical Services !<. c v ~...': 7 Yv / 9 7 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS P. 0. BOX 4970 JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA 32232-0019 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF CESAJ-CO (ll-2-240a) 21 June 1997 ~MORANDUM FOR CDR, USAED (CESAD-ET-CO-M), ATLANTA, GA 30335 SUBJECT: Advanced Maintenance Dredging of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (IWW) Jacksonville to Miami, in the Vicinity of Bakers Haulover Inlet, Dade County, Florida 1. Reference ER 1130-2-520. 2. Advanced maintenance dredging is proposed for the IWW in the vicinity of Bakers Haulover Inlet to reduce the frequency of dredging required for this reach of the IWW.
    [Show full text]
  • Fj Sgp-T-77-002 C. 2 Matanzas Inlet Glossaryof Inlets Report ¹5
    FJ SGP-T-77-002 C. 2 MATANZAS INLET GLOSSARYOF INLETS REPORT ¹5 A.J. Mehta Assistant Professor C.P. Jones Graduate Assistant Coastal and Oceanographic Engineering Laboratory University of Florida Gainesvi lie, Florida 32611 Report Number 2l State University System of Florida Sea Grant Program May, 1977 TABLE OF CONTENTS ~Pae FOREWORD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 v ACKNONLEDGEMENT .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ 1V SECTIONS: INTRODUCTION............... ~ .... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 I I. GEOLOGIC SETTING. 7 I I I. VEGETATION. 8 IV. CLIMATE AND STORM HISTORY............... 10 V. HISTORY OF THE INLET.. ~ . ~........ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ 1 5 VI. MORPHOLOGICAL CHANGES...... ~ ............ ~ i ~ 22 6. I Maps, Surveys and Photographs. 22 6.2 Outercoast Shoreline Changes.. 22 6. 3 Changes in the Inl et Cross Secti on............. VI I . HYDRAULI CS............... 43 7.1 Freshwater Di scharge, Runoff and Salinity Measurements .. 43 7.2 Tides .. 43 7.3 Currents 45 7.4 Hydraulic Parameters...... 45 7. 5 Nave C11ma te........... 50 7.6 Inlet Stability.. 50 VI I I . SEDIMENTARY CHARACTERISTICS. 60 8. 1 Volumetric Changes. 60 8.2 Littoral Material Balance.. 65 8.3 Sedimentary Characteristics...,.............. 69 IX. SUMMARY. 74 X. REFERENCES.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ 76 FOREWORD The numerous inlets connecting Florida's inner waters to the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico are important from consideration of recreational and commercial vessel traffic and also because they provide small boats access to safe refuge during unexpected severe weather and waves. In addi- tion, inlets act as flushing agents, providi ng renewal of bay waters by ex- change with outer continental shelf waters. Unfortunately, inlets also con- tr~bute significantly to the serious beach erosion problem prevalent along most of Florida's shoreline.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 SPBO (Statewide Programmatic Biological Opinion)
    nited States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE South Florida Ecological Services Office 133920” Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Service Log Number: 41910-201 1-F-0170 March 13, 2015 Alan M. Dodd, Colonel District Commander U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 701 San Marco Boulevard, Room 372 Jacksonville, Florida 32207-8175 Dear Colonel Dodd: This letter transmits the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s revised Statewide Programmatic Biological Opinion (SPBO) for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Civil Works and Regulatory sand placement activities in Florida and their effects on the following sea turtles: Northwest Atlantic Ocean distinct population segment (NWAO DPS) of loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and its designated terrestrial critical habitat; green (Chelonia mydas); leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea); hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata); and Kemp’s ridley (Lepidochelys kempii) ; and the following beach mice: southeastern (Peromyscus polionotus niveiventris); Anastasia Island (Peromyscus polionotus phasma); Choctawhatchee (Peromyscus polionotus allophrys); St. Andrews (Peromyscus polionotus peninsutaris); and Perdido Key (Peromyscus polionotus trissyllepsis) and their designated critical habitat. It does not address effects of these activities on the non-breeding piping plover (Charadrius melodus) and its designated critical habitat or for the red knot (Calidris canutus rufa). Effects of Corps planning and regulatory shore protection activities on the non-breeding piping plover and its designated critical habitat within the North Florida Ecological Services office area of responsibility and the South Florida Ecological Services office area of responsibility are addressed in the Service’s May 22, 2013, Programmatic Piping Plover Biological Opinion. Effects of shore protection activities for the piping plover in the Panama City Ecological Services office area of responsibility will be addressed on a project by project basis.
    [Show full text]
  • UFL/COEL-92/008 HISTORICAL SHORELINE RESPONSE to INLET MODIFICATIONS and SEA LEVEL RISE by Jonathan R. H. Grant Thesis
    UFL/COEL-92/008 HISTORICAL SHORELINE RESPONSE TO INLET MODIFICATIONS AND SEA LEVEL RISE by Jonathan R. H. Grant Thesis May 1992 HISTORICAL SHORELINE RESPONSE TO INLET MODIFICATIONS AND SEA LEVEL RISE By JONATHAN R. H. GRANT A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1992 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Robert Dean, for all of his assistance and utmost patience in helping me complete this thesis. The assistance of my other committee members, Dr. Ashish Mehta and Dr. Daniel Hanes, is greatly appreciated. I would like to thank Cynthia Vey, Sandra Bivins, Becky Hudson, Helen Twedell and Sabarna Malakar for their patience, humor and help in transforming my research into a thesis. I would also like to thank all of the professors who have taught me so much outside of my research work. This work was sponsored by Florida Sea Grant, whose continued support of coastal re- search is appreciated. The data used in this study were supplied by the Florida Department of Natural Resources. Special thanks goes to Emmett Foster (of FDNR) for taking the time to help furnish the most up to date shoreline data. The salvation of my sanity is the result of all my friends in Gainesville, to whom I am indebted. Thanks to all my fellow Coastals: Steve, Sam (my initial tutor to graduate school), Paul, Phil D., Jei and Mike and especially Mark and Phil H. (of G. H.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Coastal Engineering Projects in Fort Matanzas National Monument
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Inventory of Coastal Engineering Projects in Fort Matanzas National Monument Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRTR—2013/703 ON THE COVER Fort Matanzas, St. Augustine, Florida Photograph by: Kate Dallas Inventory of Coastal Engineering Projects in Fort Matanzas National Monument Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRTR—2013/703 Kate Dallas Oregon State University 104 CEOAS Administration Building Corvallis, OR 97331 Michael Berry, Peter Ruggiero Oregon State University 104 CEOAS Administration Building Corvallis, OR 97331 March 2013 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received informal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Beach Management Plan: Northeast Atlantic Coast Region Office of Resilience and Coastal Protection Florida Department of Environmental Protection
    Strategic Beach Management Plan: Northeast Atlantic Coast Region Office of Resilience and Coastal Protection Florida Department of Environmental Protection April 2020 Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Strategic Beach Management Plan – Northeast Atlantic Coast Region Table of Contents Introduction - Northeast........................................................................................................................... 1 Sea Islands ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Strategies for Inlets and Critically Eroded Beaches .......................................................................... 2 St. Marys River Entrance, Nassau County .......................................................................................... 2 Fort Clinch, Nassau County, 2,500 feet west of R1-R9 ...................................................................... 3 Fernandina Beach, Nassau County, R9-R33 ....................................................................................... 4 South Amelia Island, Nassau County, R60-R80 ................................................................................. 5 Nassau Sound, Nassau County R79 to Duval County R1 ................................................................... 6 Little Talbot Island State Park, Duval County, R21-R23 .................................................................... 7 Fort George Inlet, Duval County, R25-R26 .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]