DOCSLIB.ORG

UFL/COEL-92/008 HISTORICAL SHORELINE RESPONSE to INLET MODIFICATIONS and SEA LEVEL RISE by Jonathan R. H. Grant Thesis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UFL/COEL-92/008 HISTORICAL SHORELINE RESPONSE to INLET MODIFICATIONS and SEA LEVEL RISE by Jonathan R. H. Grant Thesis UFL/COEL-92/008 HISTORICAL SHORELINE RESPONSE TO INLET MODIFICATIONS AND SEA LEVEL RISE by Jonathan R. H. Grant Thesis May 1992 HISTORICAL SHORELINE RESPONSE TO INLET MODIFICATIONS AND SEA LEVEL RISE By JONATHAN R. H. GRANT A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1992 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Robert Dean, for all of his assistance and utmost patience in helping me complete this thesis. The assistance of my other committee members, Dr. Ashish Mehta and Dr. Daniel Hanes, is greatly appreciated. I would like to thank Cynthia Vey, Sandra Bivins, Becky Hudson, Helen Twedell and Sabarna Malakar for their patience, humor and help in transforming my research into a thesis. I would also like to thank all of the professors who have taught me so much outside of my research work. This work was sponsored by Florida Sea Grant, whose continued support of coastal re- search is appreciated. The data used in this study were supplied by the Florida Department of Natural Resources. Special thanks goes to Emmett Foster (of FDNR) for taking the time to help furnish the most up to date shoreline data. The salvation of my sanity is the result of all my friends in Gainesville, to whom I am indebted. Thanks to all my fellow Coastals: Steve, Sam (my initial tutor to graduate school), Paul, Phil D., Jei and Mike and especially Mark and Phil H. (of G. H. and Assoc.). Katia, Pete, Pete, Shannon and Annie are responsible for all my nonengineering, activities and their friendship and help in creating the Florida Four will never be forgotten. Finally, I would like to thank my brother, Dr. William "Boo" Grant for showing me that the ocean could be more than just a playground. I wish he could be here to see me accomplish that. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................ ii LIST OF FIGURES .................................... v LIST OF TABLES ...... ................................. xi ABSTRACT .................... ..................... xii CHAPTERS 1 INTRODUCTION ..................... ............ 1 1.1 Purpose of this Study ...... ............ ........... 1 1.2 Scope. ...................................... 2 2 APPROACH .................................... 7 2.1 Review of Available Data ........................... 7 2.2 Erosion at Inlets ................... ............. 9 2.2.1 Erosion at Modified Inlets .................... 10 2.2.2 The Updrift and Downdrift Extent of the Influence of Inlets . 14 2.3 Sea Level Rise ..... ... .......... ... .... 19 3 METHODOLOGY ................... ............... 23 3.1 Introduction .................... .............. 23 3.2 Shoreline Change Rates ............................ 23 3.2.1 Inlet Influenced Shoreline Segments . .... 24 3.2.2 The Coast of Florida ......................... 24 3.3 Sea Level Changes ............................. 25 4 RESULTS ...................................... 28 4.1 Introduction .................................... 28 4.2 East Coast Inlets ............................... 28 4.2.1 St. Augustine Inlet ................... ....... 28 4.2.2 Matanzas Inlet .................... ........... 32 4.2.3 Ponce de Leon Inlet ................... ....... 32 iii 4.2.4 Port Canaveral Entrance ....................... 36 4.2.5 Sebastian Inlet ............................ 40 4.2.6 Ft. Pierce Inlet ............................ 43 4.2.7 St. Lucie Inlet ... ... ... ..... ... ....... 47 4.2.8 Jupiter Inlet ....... ........ ... ... ..... .. 51 4.2.9 Lake Worth Inlet ................... ........ 54 4.2.10 South Lake Worth Inlet ....................... 57 4.2.11 Boca Raton Inlet .......................... 60 4.2.12 Hillsboro Inlet ................. ... ........ 63 4.2.13 Port Everglades Entrance . .. ... 67 4.2.14 Bakers Haulover Inlet ......................... 70 4.3 West Coast Inlets ............................... 73 4.3.1 Pensacola Pass ............................ 73 4.3.2 East Pass (Destin Harbor) ...................... 75 4.3.3 St. Andrews Bay Entrance Channel (Panama City) . ... 79 4.3.4 Mexico Beach Inlet ................... ....... 83 4.3.5 Venice Inlet ................... .......... 83 4.4 Counties .................... .............. 88 4.4.1 East Coast ................... ... ......... 88 4.4.2 W est Coast .............................. 90 4.5 Florida's Coastline .............................. 90 4.6 Effects of Inlets ................... .............. 92 4.7 Sea Level Rise ................... ..... .......... 97 5 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ....................... 104 REFERENCES .................... ................ 107 APPENDIX ...................................... .. 110 A.1 Introduction ...................... ....... ......... 110 A.2 East Coast Counties ................... .......... 112 A.3 West Coast Counties ................... .......... 126 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH ................... ........... 140 iv LIST OF FIGURES 1.1 Location of inlets along the coast of Florida covered in this thesis in- cluding the location of tide gauges from which the sea level data were obtained. ... ........... ......... .. ... ..... 4 1.2 Location of counties examined in this thesis for shoreline change. 5 1.3 Approximate longshore sediment transport along the coast of Florida. 6 2.1 DNR monuments located in St. Johns County. 8 2.2 Longshore migration of a natural inlet. ... 11 2.3 Basic transfer process of sand at a natural inlet. ... 11 2.4 Shoreline changes due to placement of a shore normal littoral barrier. 13 2.5 Shoreline changes as a result of placing jetties at an inlet ........ 16 2.6 Definitions of the variables Ob, B, h. and . ... 20 3.1 Monthly mean sea level variations and long-term sea level data at the three locations on the east coast of Florida used in this study. Based on tide gauge data (from Hicks et al., 1983). .... 27 4.1 Historical shorelines for St. Augustine Inlet (from Marino, 1986). 30 4.2 Shoreline change rates before (1858-1937) and after (1943-1986) training St. Augustine Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. ... 31 4.3 Shoreline change rates before (1858-1924) and after (1937-1986) con- struction of the Rt. A1A bridge over Matanzas Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. ................... ... ........ .... 33 4.4 Shoreline change rates before (1873-1967) and after (1972-1989) training Ponce de Leon Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. .... 35 4.5 Ponce de Leon Inlet: South jetty alignment. Adapted from Jones and M ehta, 1978. .................. .............. 36 v 4.6 Shoreline change rates before (1874-1948) and after (1964-1986) training Port Canaveral. Change rates in feet per year. ... 38 4.7 Shoreline change rates for pre- (1964-1974) and post-nourishment (1976- 1986) of the south beach of Port Canaveral. The shoreline change rates for after training (see previous figure) are included for reference. Change rates in feet per year. ................... ......... 39 4.8 Historical shorelines for Sebastian Inlet. ... 41 4.9 Shoreline change rates after training (1948-1986) Sebastian Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. ................... ......... 42 4.10 Historical shorelines for Ft. Pierce Inlet. ..... 44 4.11 Shoreline change rates after training (1928-1987) Ft. Pierce Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. ................... ......... 45 4.12 Shoreline change rates for pre- (1928-1970) and post-nourishment (1972- 1987) of Ft. Pierce Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. ... 46 4.13 Historical shorelines for St. Lucie Inlet (from Marino, 1986). 49 4.14 Shoreline change rates after training (1928-1984) St. Lucie Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. ................... ......... 50 4.15 Historical shorelines for Jupiter Inlet. ... 52 4.16 Shoreline change rates after training (1927-1980) Jupiter Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. .... .......................... 53 4.17 Historical shorelines for Lake Worth Inlet. ... 55 4.18 Shoreline change rates after training (1928-1980) Lake Worth Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. Note that indicated downdrift accretion is due to recovery following south jetty construction. .... 56 4.19 South Lake Worth Inlet in 1969 ...................... 58 4.20 Shoreline change rates after training (1928-1980) South Lake Worth In- let. Change rates in feet per year. ..... 59 4.21 Historical shorelines for Boca Raton Inlet (from Marino, 1986) ... 61 4.22 Shoreline change rates after training (1942-1980) Boca Raton Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. ........... ...... .... ... 62 4.23 Hillsboro Inlet in 1967. ............................ 64 4.24 Shoreline change rates before (1883-1962) and after (1970-1985) jetty construction at Hillsboro Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. 65 vi 4.25 Shoreline change rates after construction (1935-1985) of initial training device (north rock groin) at Hillsboro Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. 66 4.26 Historical shorelines for Port Everglades Entrance. ... 68 4.27 Shoreline change rates after training (1935-1985) of Port Everglades En- trance. Change rates in feet per year. .... 69 4.28 Historical shorelines for Bakers Haulover Inlet. ... 71 4.29 Shoreline change rates after training (1927-1986) of Bakers Haulover Inlet. Downdrift shoreline includes shoreline change rates prior to Miami Beach nourishment (1927-1974). Change rates in feet per year. 72 4.30 Long term (1856-1978) shoreline change rates adjacent to Pensacola Pass. Change rates in feet per year. ....... 74 4.31 Historical shorelines for East Pass (Destin Harbor).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Experience Ocean, Lakes Abd Everglades in the Palm Beaches
    YEAR 2017 Experience Ocean, Lakes and Everglades in The Palm Beaches, Florida Discover the best way to experience Florida’s great outdoors, unique wildlife and natural beauty in The Palm Beaches. Situated between 47 miles of Atlantic Ocean and the shores of Lake Okeechobee, the largest lake in the southeastern United States, The Palm Beaches is the gateway to the Everglades and home to treasured animal sanctuaries, untouched nature preserves and a diverse range of soft adventure activities. TAKE A HIKE (OR PICTURE) Beauty is just a short hike away. The terrain is mostly flat, but tropical trees and plants abound with exotic wonder. Trek alongside wetlands in the Everglades or through wide-open wet prairie, no matter the trail, hikers will find sunshine serenity. DuPuis Management Area – Canal Point, FL The DuPuis Management Area is a 21,875-acre multi-use natural area located in the northwestern part of The Palm Beaches. The park land is interspersed with numerous ponds, wet prairies, cypress domes, pine flatwoods and remnant Everglades marsh. The area provides miles of hiking and horseback trails, an equestrian center, graded vehicle roads, backpack and group campsites as well as seasonal hunting. DuPuis is far from urban areas, and its dark night sky lends itself to excellent stargazing. Harold A. Campbell Public Use Area This site covers 17,000 acres on the southern border of The Palm Beaches, making it the largest constructed wetland in the world. Its public use area provides access to vast wetland habitat where bicyclists, hikers and birdwatchers can see a variety of wildlife native to Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • SEBASTIAN RIVER SALINITY REGIME Report of a Study
    Special Publication SJ94-SP1 SEBASTIAN RIVER SALINITY REGIME Report of a Study Part I. Review of Goals, Policies, and Objectives Part II: Segmentation Parts III and IV: Recommended Targets (Contract 92W-177) Submitted to the: St. Johns River Water Management District by the: Mote Marine Laboratory 1600 Thompson Parkway Sarasota, Florida 34236 Ernest D. Estevez, Ph.D. and Michael J. Marshall, Ph.D. Principal Investigators EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This is the third and final report of a project concerning desirable salinity conditions in the Sebastian River and adjacent Indian River Lagoon. A perception exists among resource managers that the present salinity regime of the Sebastian River system is undesirable. The St. Johns River Water Management District desires to learn the nature of an "environmentally desirable and acceptable salinity regime" for the Sebastian River and adjacent waters of the Indian River Lagoon. The District can then calculate discharges needed to produce the desired salinity regime, or conclude that optimal discharges are beyond its control. The values of studying salinity and making it a management priority in estuaries are four-fold. First, salinity has intrinsic significance as an important regulatory factor. Second, changes in the salinity regime of an estuary tend to be relatively easy to handle from a computational and practical point of view. Third, eliminating salinity as a problem clears the way for studies of, and corrective actions for, more insidious factors. Fourth, the strong covariance of salinity and other factors that tend to be management problems in estuaries makes salinity a useful tool in their analysis. Freshwater inflow and salinity are integral aspects of estuaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Collier Miami-Dade Palm Beach Hendry Broward Glades St
    Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission F L O R ID A 'S T U R N P IK E er iv R ee m Lakewood Park m !( si is O K L D INDRIO ROAD INDRIO RD D H I N COUNTY BCHS Y X I L A I E O W L H H O W G Y R I D H UCIE BLVD ST L / S FT PRCE ILT SRA N [h G Fort Pierce Inlet E 4 F N [h I 8 F AVE "Q" [h [h A K A V R PELICAN YACHT CLUB D E . FORT PIERCE CITY MARINA [h NGE AVE . OKEECHOBEE RA D O KISSIMMEE RIVER PUA NE 224 ST / CR 68 D R !( A D Fort Pierce E RD. OS O H PIC R V R T I L A N N A M T E W S H N T A E 3 O 9 K C A R-6 A 8 O / 1 N K 0 N C 6 W C W R 6 - HICKORY HAMMOCK WMA - K O R S 1 R L S 6 R N A E 0 E Lake T B P U Y H D A K D R is R /NW 160TH E si 68 ST. O m R H C A me MIDWAY RD. e D Ri Jernigans Pond Palm Lake FMA ver HUTCHINSON ISL . O VE S A t C . T I IA EASY S N E N L I u D A N.E. 120 ST G c I N R i A I e D South N U R V R S R iv I 9 I V 8 FLOR e V ESTA DR r E ST.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2016 Division 3, 7Th CG District Aux
    The Log Publication USCGAUX Flotilla 36 Boca Raton, Florida Flotilla 36 Volume XXXV, Issue 7 Boca Raton, Florida Division 3, 7th CG District Aux July, 2011 Volume XXXX, Issue 6 June 2016 Division 3, 7th CG District Aux http://www.cgauxboca.org This version FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Disseminate to US Coast Guard and Coast Guard Auxiliary ONLY Flotilla 36 wished a fond farewell to Richard and Maddy Edwards, who have moved to Jacksonville, FL. Rick has been an FC, VFC, instructor, vessel examiner, and program visitor, as well as many other duties for the flotilla and division. He will be greatly missed. We all wish him the best in his new home. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE - PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 The information contained in this publication is subject to the provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974, and may only be used for the official business the Coast Guard or the Coast Guard Auxiliary The Log Publication USCGAUX Flotilla 36 Boca Raton, Florida And the Award goes to…. Robert Tingley (3rd from left) is sworn in by FC Tom Thayer, VCDR D3 Marvin Merritt, and IPFC Rick Edwards. Todd Greenstein is sworn in as FSO-IS by IPFC Rick Edwards, VCDR D3 Marvin Merritt, and FC Tom Thayer. The Log Publication USCGAUX Flotilla 36 Boca Raton, Florida The USGC Meritorious Team Commendation for participating on the 2015 D3 Boat Show Team is awarded to Ron Dillon, Andrea Rutherfoord, Helene Houge, Rick Edwards, and Mario Stagliano. Other flotilla members who participated received their awards at the Division meeting. The Log Publication USCGAUX Flotilla 36 Boca Raton, Florida From the Helm… Tom Thayer Flotilla Commander 3 6 [email protected] Greetings, fellow Auxiliary Members! The Flotilla year continues to roll right along.
    [Show full text]
  • USGS 7.5-Minute Image Map for Matanzas Inlet, Florida
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MATANZAS INLET QUADRANGLE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FLORIDA T9S 7.5-MINUTE SERIES 81°15' 12'30" 10' 81°07' 30" IntracoastalR30E4 000m Waterway 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 29°45' 76 E 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 610 000 FEET 86 87 29°45' 3291000mN 3291 FLORIDA 2 «¬A1 S Devils Elbow T . r J e O v H i R N S S s s 11 32 32 a C 90 90 z O n a t a M Anastasia Island 3289 3289 12 1 960 000 FEET «¬A1 3288 3288 T9S R30E 13 Fort 3287 Matanzas 3287 FORT MATANZAS NATIONAL MONUMENT 24 Imagery................................................NAIP, January 2010 Roads..............................................©2006-2010 Tele Atlas Names...............................................................GNIS, 2010 42'30" 42'30" Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2010 Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2010 Claude Varne ATLANTIC Bridge Matanzas Inlet OCEAN 3286 3286 DR RIA TA RA AR B G E N E E Rattlesnake J RD Summer Haven O SON Island HN OLD A1A J U N E E A1 32 32 L «¬ 85 85 N M a t a n z a s s R i v e r 3284 3284 3283 3283 ST. JOHNS CO FLAGLER CO «¬A1 3282 Intracoastal Waterway 3282 40' 40' Hemming Point N N O C E A N Marineland S H O R E E B r L V e D v i 32 R DEERWOOD ST 3281 81 2 s a BEACHSIDE DR k z e n e a r t C a r r M e SHADY OAK LN c i .
    [Show full text]
  • Coast Guard, DHS § 80.525
    Coast Guard, DHS Pt. 80 Madagascar Singapore 80.715 Savannah River. Maldives Surinam 80.717 Tybee Island, GA to St. Simons Is- Morocco Tonga land, GA. Oman Trinidad 80.720 St. Simons Island, GA to Amelia Is- land, FL. Pakistan Tobago Paraguay 80.723 Amelia Island, FL to Cape Canaveral, Tunisia Peru FL. Philippines Turkey 80.727 Cape Canaveral, FL to Miami Beach, Portugal United Republic of FL. Republic of Korea Cameroon 80.730 Miami Harbor, FL. 80.735 Miami, FL to Long Key, FL. [CGD 77–075, 42 FR 26976, May 26, 1977. Redes- ignated by CGD 81–017, 46 FR 28153, May 26, PUERTO RICO AND VIRGIN ISLANDS 1981; CGD 95–053, 61 FR 9, Jan. 2, 1996] SEVENTH DISTRICT PART 80—COLREGS 80.738 Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands. DEMARCATION LINES GULF COAST GENERAL SEVENTH DISTRICT Sec. 80.740 Long Key, FL to Cape Sable, FL. 80.01 General basis and purpose of demarca- 80.745 Cape Sable, FL to Cape Romano, FL. tion lines. 80.748 Cape Romano, FL to Sanibel Island, FL. ATLANTIC COAST 80.750 Sanibel Island, FL to St. Petersburg, FL. FIRST DISTRICT 80.753 St. Petersburg, FL to Anclote, FL. 80.105 Calais, ME to Cape Small, ME. 80.755 Anclote, FL to the Suncoast Keys, 80.110 Casco Bay, ME. FL. 80.115 Portland Head, ME to Cape Ann, MA. 80.757 Suncoast Keys, FL to Horseshoe 80.120 Cape Ann, MA to Marblehead Neck, Point, FL. MA. 80.760 Horseshoe Point, FL to Rock Island, 80.125 Marblehead Neck, MA to Nahant, FL.
    [Show full text]
  • Currently the Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems
    CRITICALLY ERODED BEACHES IN FLORIDA Updated, June 2009 BUREAU OF BEACHES AND COASTAL SYSTEMS DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION STATE OF FLORIDA Foreword This report provides an inventory of Florida's erosion problem areas fronting on the Atlantic Ocean, Straits of Florida, Gulf of Mexico, and the roughly seventy coastal barrier tidal inlets. The erosion problem areas are classified as either critical or noncritical and county maps and tables are provided to depict the areas designated critically and noncritically eroded. This report is periodically updated to include additions and deletions. A county index is provided on page 13, which includes the date of the last revision. All information is provided for planning purposes only and the user is cautioned to obtain the most recent erosion areas listing available. This report is also available on the following web site: http://www.dep.state.fl.us/beaches/uublications/tech-rut.htm APPROVED BY Michael R. Barnett, P.E., Bureau Chief Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems June, 2009 Introduction In 1986, pursuant to Sections 161.101 and 161.161, Florida Statutes, the Department of Natural Resources, Division of Beaches and Shores (now the Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems) was charged with the responsibility to identify those beaches of the state which are critically eroding and to develop and maintain a comprehensive long-term management plan for their restoration. In 1989, a first list of erosion areas was developed based upon an abbreviated definition of critical erosion. That list included 217.6 miles of critical erosion and another 114.8 miles of noncritical erosion statewide.
    [Show full text]
  • Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, Florida: Maintenance Dredging
    FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA, TO MIAMI, FLORIDA MAINTENANCE DREDGING Prepared by U. S. Army Engineer District, Jacksonville Jacksonville, Florida May 1974 INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY. JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI MAINTENANCE DREDGING ( ) Draft (X) Final Responsible Office: U. S. Army Engineer District, Jacksonville, Florida. 1. Name of Action: (X) Administrative ( ) Legislative 2. Description of Action: Eleven shoals are to be removed from this section of the Intracoastal Waterway as a part of the regular main­ tenance program. 3. a. Environmental Impacts. About 172,200 cubic yards of shoal material in the channel will be removed by hydraulic dredge and placed in diked upland areas and as nourishment on a county park beach south of Jupiter Inlet. b. Adverse Environmental Effects. Dredging will have a temporary adverse effect on water quality and will destroy benthic organisms in both the shoal material and on the beach. In addition, some turtle nests at the beach nourishment site may be destroyed. 4. Alternatives. Consideration was given to alternate methods of spoil disposal. It was determined that the methods selected (as described in paragraph 1) would best accomplish the purpose of the project while minimizing adverse impact on the environment. 5. Comments received on the draft statement in response to the 3 November 1972 coordination letter: Respondent Date of Comments U. S. Coast Guard 7 November 1972 U. S. Department of Agriculture 8 November 1972 Florida State Museum 8 November 1972 Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 14 November 1972 Florida Department of Transportation 20 November 1972 Florida Department of Natural Resources 30 November 1972 Environmental Protection Agency 8 December 1972 Florida G&FWFC 13 December 1972 U.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Reports
    Stock boundaries for spotted seatrout (Cynoscion nebulosus) in Florida based on population genetic structure Item Type monograph Authors Seyoum, Seifu; Tringali, Michael D.; Barthel, Brandon L.; Villanova, Vicki; Puchulutegui, Cecilia; Davis, Michelle C.; Alvarez, Alicia C. Publisher Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Fish and Wildlife Research Institute Download date 04/10/2021 17:27:27 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/41131 Florida Fish and Wildlife Research Institute TECHNICAL REPORTS Stock Boundaries for Spotted Seatrout (Cynoscion nebulosus) in Florida Based on Population Genetic Structure Seifu Seyoum, Michael D. Tringali, Brandon L. Barthel, Vicki Villanova Cecilia Puchulutegui, Michelle C. Davis, Alicia C. Alvarez Rick Scott Governor of Florida Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Nick Wiley Executive Director The Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWRI) is a division of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). The FWC is “managing fish and wildlife resources for their long-term well-being and the benefit of people.” The FWRI conducts applied research pertinent to managing fishery resources and species of special concern in Florida. Programs at FWRI focus on obtaining the data and information that managers of fish, wildlife, and ecosystem resources need to sustain Florida’s natural resources. Topics include managing recreationally and commercially important fish and wildlife species; preserving, managing, and restoring terrestrial, freshwater, and marine habitats; collecting information related to population status, habitat requirements, life history, and recovery needs of upland and aquatic species; synthesizing ecological, habitat, and socioeconomic information; and developing educational and outreach programs for classroom educators, civic organizations, and the public. The FWRI publishes three series: Memoirs of the Hourglass Cruises, Florida Marine Research Publications, and FWRI Technical Reports.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Proposed Action
    United States Department of the Interior FIS H AND WILDLIFE SERVICE South Florida Ecological Services Office 1339 20 111 Street Vero Beach. Florida 32960 Service Log Number: 41910-2011-F-0170 March 13, 2015 Alan M. Dodd, Colonel District Commander U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 701 San Marco Boulevard, Room 3 72 Jacksonville, Florida 32207-8175 Dear Colonel Dodd: This letter transmits the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's revised Statewide Programmatic Biological Opinion (SPBO) for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Civil Works and Regulatory sand placement activities in Florida and their effects on the following sea turtles: Northwest Atlantic Ocean distinct population segment (NW AO DPS) of loggerhead (Carella caretta) and its designated terrestrial critical habitat; green (Chelonia mydas); leatherback (Dermoche!ys coriacea); hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata); and Kemp's ridley (Lepidochelys kempii) ; and the following beach mice: southeastern (Peromyscus polionotus niveiventris); Anastasia Island (Peromyscus polionolus phasma); Choctawhatchee (Peromyscus polionotus a!lophrys); St. Andrews (Peromyscus polionotus peninsularis) ; and Perdido Key (Peromyscus polionotus trissyllepsis) and their designated critical habitat. It does not address effects of these activities on the non-breeding piping plover (Charadrius melodus) and its designated critical habitat or for the red knot (Calidris canutus rufa), a species currently proposed for listing. Effects of Corps planning and regulatory shore protection activities on the non-breeding piping plover and its designated critical habitat within the North Florida Ecological Services office area of responsibility and the South Florida Ecological Services office area of responsibility are addressed in the Service's May 22, 2013, Programmatic Piping Plover Biological Opinion.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on the Lagoons of East Centeral Florida
    1974 (11th) Vol.1 Technology Today for The Space Congress® Proceedings Tomorrow Apr 1st, 8:00 AM Studies On The Lagoons Of East Centeral Florida J. A. Lasater Professor of Oceanography, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Florida T. A. Nevin Professor of Microbiology Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings Scholarly Commons Citation Lasater, J. A. and Nevin, T. A., "Studies On The Lagoons Of East Centeral Florida" (1974). The Space Congress® Proceedings. 2. https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings/proceedings-1974-11th-v1/session-8/2 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Space Congress® Proceedings by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDIES ON THE LAGOONS OF EAST CENTRAL FLORIDA Dr. J. A. Lasater Dr. T. A. Nevin Professor of Oceanography Professor of Microbiology Florida Institute of Technology Melbourne, Florida ABSTRACT There are no significant fresh water streams entering the Indian River Lagoon south of the Ponce de Leon Inlet; Detailed examination of the water quality parameters of however, the Halifax River estuary is just north of the the lagoons of East Central Florida were begun in 1969. Inlet. The principal sources of fresh water entering the This investigation was subsequently expanded to include Indian River Lagoon appear to be direct land runoff and a other aspects of these waters. General trends and a number of small man-made canals. The only source of statistical model are beginning to emerge for the water fresh water entering the Banana River is direct land run­ quality parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Riviera Beach, Florida
    THE BICENTENNIAL COMNISSION OF RIVIERA BEACH Bobbie E. Brooks, Chairman Nanette Thomas, Secretary-Coordinator Members : Marsha Baker Edna Ortiz Mary Jo Baker James Owens Louise Bowe Johnnie Phillips John George Brat John Shillingburg Gertrude Burney Sophia Sullivan Irene Carr Michael Taylor Barbara Cohen Tom Terry T. B. Engrain Helen Tooke ?!erry Herring Glenn Travers George McClain Marian White Nary Miller William Wilkins Antonio Ortiz v Coordinators: Lynn Brink - Library Director Davender Kant - City Planner Vasilis Patsilaris - Assistant Planner Cover Photo: Auctioning of the lots in the original town site of Riviera, held in front of the F.E.C. ailroad Station at Lakeview (W. 10th St.) and . Commercial, 1913. A HISTORY OF RIVIERA BEACH, FLORIDA Lynn Brink, editor History Comni ttee Members : Louise Bowe John Brat Gertrude Burney Barbara Cohen George McCl ain Jim Owens Tom Terry Helen Tooke Nanette Thomas Published by the Bicentennial Commission of Riviera Beach, Florida with the assistance ,of the Bicenten- nial Commission of Florida and the Bicentennial Commission of Palm Beach County. Acknowledgement of illustrations; Cover: Edith L. Newcomb , Historical Society of Palm Beach County Historical Society of Palm Beach County Palm Beach county- Platbook Edith L. Newcomb Edith L. Newcomb Edith L. Newcomb Edith L. Nowcomb Dorothy Halsey Theroux Dorothy Halsey Theroux Larry Kersey Larry Kersey Dorothy Halsey Theroux Virgil R. Strain Historical Society of Palm Beach County Palm Beach Post Times Palm Beach Post Times 9 Virgil R. Strain Edith L. Newcomb Mr. and Mrs. Maxwell Pinder Larry Kersey Historical Society of Palm Beach County Port of Palm Beach Copyright 1976 by The City of Riviera Beach, Florida All rights reserved Contents The Indians .....................................
    [Show full text]