Managing Railcar Maintenance, F T a Report Number 0043
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
November 2008 Bulletin.Pub
TheNEW YORK DIVISION BULLETIN - NOVEMBER, 2008 Bulletin New York Division, Electric Railroaders’ Association Vol. 51, No. 11 November, 2008 The Bulletin IND EXTENDED TO EUCLID AVENUE 60 YEARS AGO Published by the New On November 28, 1948, A service was ex- a simpler circuit was available. R-42s were York Division, Electric Railroaders’ Association, tended from Broadway-East New York to the first cars equipped with a solid state in- Incorporated, PO Box Euclid Avenue. Test trains started running at verter, which converted the direct current 3001, New York, New 12:01 AM and revenue service began at 7 from the third rail to high frequency alternat- York 10008-3001. AM. Additional service was provided by 40 R- ing current. 10 cars, which were just delivered. The old-type windmill fans were replaced For general inquiries, OPENING CEREMONIES by eight 12-inch bracket fans mounted two contact us at nydiv@ Stores in the vicinity of the Euclid Avenue on a fixture. To maintain uniform car tempera- electricrailroaders.org station were decorated with bunting and a ture, the car heaters were thermostatically or by phone at (212) small crowd that gathered near the subway controlled. Shock absorbers dampened vi- 986-4482 (voice mail available). ERA’s entrance was waiting for the Mayor to arrive bration and side sway. website is in his automobile. A newspaper photo shows Following is a summary of delivery and in- www.electricrailroaders. Borough President Cashmore and Mayor service dates: org. O’Dwyer putting dimes in the turnstile slots at DELIVERED IN SERVICE Euclid Avenue. Editorial Staff: Date Car(s) Date Car(s) Editor-in-Chief: While about 250 representatives of civic Bernard Linder and transportation groups were present, First August 19, 1803 November 1830-1838, News Editor: Mayor O’Dwyer officially opened the $47 mil- 1948 19, 1948 1843 Randy Glucksman lion extension. -
United States District Court Southern District of Ohio Western Division
Case: 1:05-cv-00437-MHW Doc #: 155 Filed: 03/15/13 Page: 1 of 10 PAGEID #: <pageID> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION American Premier Underwriters, Inc., Plaintiff, Case No. 1:05cv437 v. Judge Michael R. Barrett General Electric Company, Defendant. OPINION & ORDER This matter is before the Court upon Defendant General Electric Company’s (“GE”) Motion for Summary Judgment on the Merits. (Doc. 92). Plaintiff American Premier Underwriters, Inc.’s (“APU”) filed a Memorandum in Opposition (Doc. 123), and GE filed a Reply (Doc. 142). GE has also filed a Notice of Supplemental Authority (Doc. 148), to which APU filed a Response (Doc. 149) and GE filed a Reply (Doc. 150). I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff APU is the successor to the Penn Central Transportation Company (“Penn Central”). This action arises from contamination at four rail yards operated by Penn Central prior to April 1, 1976: (1) the Paoli Yard, located in Paoli, Pennsylvania; (2) the South Amboy Yard, located in South Amboy, New Jersey; (3) Sunnyside Yard, located in Long Island, New York; and (4) Wilmington Shops and related facilities, located in Wilmington, Delaware. During the period when Penn Central operated these rail yards, it owned and used passenger rail cars with transformers manufactured by Defendant GE. APU claims the GE transformers contaminated the rail yards by leaking polychlorinated biphenyls (“PCBs”). The PCBs were contained in “Pyranol,” which was Case: 1:05-cv-00437-MHW Doc #: 155 Filed: 03/15/13 Page: 2 of 10 PAGEID #: <pageID> the trade name of the fluid used by GE in the transformers as a cooling and insulating fluid. -
April 1, 2010 Lancaster Dispatcher Page 2 April 2010 the Power Director by Ed Mayover
75TH ANNIVERSARY 1935-2010 VOLUME 41 NUMBER 4 APRIL 2010 APRIL 1, 1976 - CONRAIL 34TH ANNIVERSARY - APRIL 1, 2010 LANCASTER DISPATCHER PAGE 2 APRIL 2010 THE POWER DIRECTOR BY ED MAYOVER multiple-unit (DMU) cars, though the study carefully lists numerous Amtrak Launches Wireless Access on Acela trains caveats. “If Amtrak is to take a leadership on a DMU concept,” the Amtrak has rolled out wireless Internet access on all study says, “there must be sufficient vehicles required to justify a new 20 of its Acela Express trains between Washington product development launch. Ideally this should be a vehicle and Boston and in six major stations along the requirement of over 100 cars." [Railway Age Rail Group News] northeast corridor. The service is free for now, though the railroad says that policy will be reviewed after an introductory period. NYC Moynihan Station Project Advances After Feds Dole Out Wireless is now available inside the gate areas of Washington Union Stimulus Dollars Station, Baltimore Penn Station, Philadelphia 30th Street Station, New On Feb. 16, Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) announced the U.S. York Penn Station, Providence Station and Route 128 Station in Department of Transportation (USDOT) awarded an $83.3 million Boston, as well as on board the Acela. Amtrak says Wilmington Station Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) will be Wi-Fi equipped once station renovations are completed in 2011. program grant for the Moynihan Station project in New York City. The [Associated Press via American Rail Link] project calls for converting a former post office into a train station Amtrak Releases “Fleet Strategy” For Rolling Stock named after the late Sen. -
Section 4 ELECTRIC ROLLING STOCK EQUIPMENT POWER
Section 4 ELECTRIC ROLLING STOCK EQUIPMENT POWER 4.1 EQUIPMENT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS The rolling stock equipment to be selected must be designed and built in full accordance with the rules and regulations issued by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and the Recommendations issued by the American Public Transportation Association (APTA). On May 12, 1999, FRA issued comprehensive rules addressing rail vehicle design and construction in accordance with operating speeds. Tier I of the rules apply to "...railroad passengerequipment operating at speedsnot exceeding 125 mph..." "Unless otherwise specified, these requirements only apply to passenger equipment ordered on or after September 8, 2000 or placed in service for the first time on or after September 9, 2002. The rule also states that "The structural standards of this subpart. do not apply to passengerequipment if used exclusively on a rail line: (i) With no public highway-rail grade crossings; (ii) On which no freight operations occur at any time; (iii) On which only passengerequipment of compatible design is utilized; (iv) On which trains operate at speedsnot exceeding 79 mph. The rule provides for alternative compliance by demonstrating "...at least an equivalent of safety in such environment with respect to the protection of its occupants from serious injury in the case of a derailment or collision." Given the fact that JPB's equipment: a) operates, or may operate in the future, on the same lines as other freight and passengertrains; and b) that it will likely operate at speeds higher than 79 mph in the future, it is assumed that the electrically powered rolling stock will be required to meet the rules and regulations as written, with no waivers or alternative solutions. -
Northeast Corridor Chase, Maryland January 4, 1987
PB88-916301 NATIONAL TRANSPORT SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C. 20594 RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT REAR-END COLLISION OF AMTRAK PASSENGER TRAIN 94, THE COLONIAL AND CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION FREIGHT TRAIN ENS-121, ON THE NORTHEAST CORRIDOR CHASE, MARYLAND JANUARY 4, 1987 NTSB/RAR-88/01 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 2.Government Accession No. 3.Recipient's Catalog No. NTSB/RAR-88/01 . PB88-916301 Title and Subtitle Railroad Accident Report^ 5-Report Date Rear-end Collision of'*Amtrak Passenger Train 949 the January 25, 1988 Colonial and Consolidated Rail Corporation Freight -Performing Organization Train ENS-121, on the Northeast Corridor, Code Chase, Maryland, January 4, 1987 -Performing Organization 7. "Author(s) ~~ Report No. Performing Organization Name and Address 10.Work Unit No. National Transportation Safety Board Bureau of Accident Investigation .Contract or Grant No. Washington, D.C. 20594 k3-Type of Report and Period Covered 12.Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Iroad Accident Report lanuary 4, 1987 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD Washington, D. C. 20594 1*+.Sponsoring Agency Code 15-Supplementary Notes 16 Abstract About 1:16 p.m., eastern standard time, on January 4, 1987, northbound Conrail train ENS -121 departed Bay View yard at Baltimore, Mary1 and, on track 1. The train consisted of three diesel-electric freight locomotive units, all under power and manned by an engineer and a brakeman. Almost simultaneously, northbound Amtrak train 94 departed Pennsylvania Station in Baltimore. Train 94 consisted of two electric locomotive units, nine coaches, and three food service cars. In addition to an engineer, conductor, and three assistant conductors, there were seven Amtrak service employees and about 660 passengers on the train. -
2012 APTA Awards Program
Celebrating Excellence in the Public Transportation Industry 2012 A PTA Awards October 2, 2012 Seattle, Washington 2012 American Public Transportation Association Awards The prestigious APTA Awards are given to those individuals and organizations that have made outstanding contributions to the public transportation industry in North America. Winning an APTA Award means that you are “the best of the best” and a distinguished leader. Today we honor a constellation of stars in the public transportation industry. As stellar role models of excellence, these individuals and organizations have led the way, successfully advancing public transportation on the local and national levels. Today’s ceremony is our chance to applaud their achievements and give them the congratulations and thanks that they deserve. I hope all of you will have a chance to personally thank them as well. Finally, as the chair of the 2012 APTA Awards Committee, I want to thank all the members of the Awards Committee for their dedication and hard work. Rosa Navejar Chair, 2012 APTA Awards Committee and Board Vice Chair Fort Worth Transportation Authority (The T) Fort Worth, TX Many thanks to SPX Genfare for sponsoring the 2012 APTA Awards Book. Cover illustration: ©istockphoto.com/AndreaAstes 2012 APTA Award Winners ORGANIZATION AWARDS INNOVATION AWARD Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority ................................... 2 OUTSTANDING PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ACHIEVEMENT AWARD Rock Island County Metropolitan Mass Transit District (MetroLINK) .................... 4 Metro Transit ............................................................... 6 Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority ................................ 8 INDIVIDUAL AWARDS LOCAL DISTINGUISHED SERVICE AWARD Mayor Antonio R. Villaraigosa .................................................... 10 OUTSTANDING PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION BOARD MEMBER AWARD Gregory A. (Greg) Evans, M.Ed. ................................................... 12 Lee Kemp ..................................................................... -
Executive Summary
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PENNSYLVANIA Public Transportation Annual Performance Report Fiscal Year 2009-10 April 30, 2011 Dear Fellow Pennsylvanians: It has been a productive and exciting year in public transportation! Pennsylvania invested more than $1.2 billion, providing more than 430 million trips, meeting the needs of commuters, business travelers, seniors, persons with disabilities and others. We identified opportunities for delivering more service with less money to maximize the investment of state and other public funding. We have evaluated transit agency management through performance reviews; ensured compliance through on-site agency reviews; enhanced the quality of life through energy initiatives, technology, and human service transportation services; and established a framework for continued improvements. Highlights of fiscal year (FY) 2009-10 include: • Assessed transit agency performance to improve efficiency and effectiveness. • Piloted Human Services Transportation projects designed to contain cost increases, test alternative approaches to providing service, and improve customer service. • Secured additional federal dollars for technology, hybrid buses, and “state of good repair” capital projects. • Advanced Keystone Corridor improvements—grade crossings and station improvements to increase safety, speed, and ridership. • Distributed $766 million in operating funds and more than $330 million in capital funds. The Pennsylvania Public Transportation Annual Performance Report for Fiscal Year 2009-10—an executive summary and a report that profiles every Pennsylvania transit system, including executive summaries of the first three transit system performance reviews—can be viewed in its entirety at www.dot.state.pa.us\ Public Transportation\Bureau of Public Transportation\Bureau Publications. The individual transit system performance reviews can be accessed through the same web site under Public Transportation\Bureau of Public Transportation\Act 44 Performance Reviews. -
Crisis Planning & Management
CRISIS PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT SEPTA SILVERLINER V ISSUE JEFFREY D. KNUEPPEL, PE GENERAL MANAGER CRISIS PLANNING & MANAGEMENT REGIONAL SERVICE PROFILE • 13 Regional Rail lines with over 150 stations • Regional Rail Ridership over 37M annually and has increased 52% since 1998 • 770 trains per day on weekdays (570 per day on weekends) • Total track miles: 474 – 234 SEPTA track miles – 240 Amtrak track miles CRISIS PLANNING & MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW - CHRONOLOGY • June 29th: Inspector notices a problem with a Silverliner V car and removes it from service for further evaluation • June 30th: Silverliner V defect identified at Overbrook Shop • Upon inspection, Vehicle Maintenance personnel found more cracks in several cars which indicated a fleetwide equalizer beam problem • July 1st: Entire 120 car Silverliner V fleet grounded CRISIS PLANNING & MANAGEMENT CONTEXT OF DISCOVERY • Silverliner V’s constitute 30% of Regional Rail fleet • Silverliner V cars are new! • 58% of fleet is 40+ years old! • DNC coming to Philly in 3 weeks • City labor contract expires on 10/31/16!! CRISIS PLANNING & MANAGEMENT EQUALIZER BEAM Equalizer Beam Equalizer ‘Foot’ – welded onto beam Equalizer Seat Equalizer Pad (1/2 inch resilient pad) CRISIS PLANNING & MANAGEMENT WORKING TOGETHER • SEPTA immediately retained LTK Engineers at the start of the Silverliner V issue • Hyundai Rotem, SEPTA, and LTK worked cooperatively on computer modeling, metallurgical evaluation, vehicle instrumentation and developed temporary and then permanent repair schemes CRISIS PLANNING & MANAGEMENT -
Accessibility in Rail Facilities
9/7/2017 Accessibility in Rail Facilities Kenneth Shiotani Senior Staff Attorney National Disability Rights Network 820 First Street Suite 740 Washington, DC 20002 (202) 408-9514 x 126 [email protected] September 2017 1 ADA Transportation Provisions Making Transportation Accessible was a major focus of the statutory provisions of the ADA PART B - Actions Applicable to Public Transportation Provided by Public Entities Considered Discriminatory [Subtitle B] SUBPART I - Public Transportation Other Than by Aircraft or Certain Rail Operations [Part I] 42 U.S.C. § 12141 – 12150 Definitions – fixed route and demand responsive, requirements for new, used and remanufactured vehicles, complementary paratransit, requirements in new facilities and alterations of existing facilities and key stations SUBPART II - Public Transportation by Intercity and Commuter Rail [Part II] 42 U.S.C. § 12161- 12165 Detailed requirements for new, used and remanufactured rail cars for commuter and intercity service and requirements for new and altered stations and key stations 2 1 9/7/2017 What Do the DOT ADA Regulations Require? Accessible railcars • Means for wheelchair users to board • Clear path for wheelchair user in railcar • Wheelchair space • Handrails and stanchions that do create barriers for wheelchair users • Public address systems • Between-Car Barriers • Accessible restrooms if restrooms are provided for passengers in commuter cars • Additional mode-specific requirements for thresholds, steps, floor surfaces and lighting 3 What are the different ‘modes’ of passenger rail under the ADA? • Rapid Rail (defined as “Subway-type,” full length, high level boarding) 49 C.F.R. Part 38 Subpart C - NYCTA, Boston T, Chicago “L,” D.C. -
May 2011 Bulletin.Pub
TheNEW YORK DIVISION BULLETIN - MAY, 2011 Bulletin New York Division, Electric Railroaders’ Association Vol. 54, No. 5 May, 2011 The Bulletin TWO ANNIVERSARIES— Published by the New DYRE AVENUE AND NASSAU STREET York Division, Electric Railroaders’ Association, 70TH ANNIVERSARY OF DYRE from the same terminal five minutes later and Incorporated, PO Box 3001, New York, New AVENUE SERVICE the first revenue train followed at 11:56 AM. York 10008-3001. On May 15, 1941, IRT trains started operat- There was no midnight service when gate ing in the Bronx on the former New York, trains started running in 1941. Two-car trains Westchester & Boston Railway right-of-way. provided shuttle service until through service For general inquiries, began in 1957. Transit Authority statistics contact us at nydiv@ Northeast Bronx residents were finally able to erausa.org or by phone enjoy rapid transit that was promised, but indicate that fares were always collected at at (212) 986-4482 (voice delayed for several years. each station and by Conductors on the trains. mail available). The When the IND Concourse Line was built, It is believed that passengers deposited their Division’s website is the City expected to extend it via Burke Ave- fares in the turnstiles at the stations during www.erausa.org/ rush hours and that the Conductors collected nydiv.html. nue and Boston Road to Baychester Avenue. But the City ran out of money during the De- fares on the shuttles when riding was light. Editorial Staff: pression and the line was never built. It At first, riding remained nearly constant be- Editor-in-Chief: chose the cheaper alternative, rehabilitation cause no new housing was built during World Bernard Linder War II. -
Silverliner V Rail Car Procurement
Silverliner V Rail Car Procurement Progress Report February 2011 Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority Silverliner V Rail Car Procurement Project Progress Report February 2011 Executive Summary Activities in February focused on production car testing, by the Delaware Transit Corporation (DTC) so that operator and maintainer training, as well as production SEPTA can meet future ridership growth on the activities at the Weccacoe plant. Wilmington Line. During the month of February the pilot cars were primarily used for SEPTA revenue service operation and employee training. In Summary….. The first three production cars, which were delivered to All but one First Article Inspections (FAI) and Type SEPTA in late 2010, went through some additional Tests have been completed, while the first production testing before entering revenue service operation during cars started revenue service. the second half of February. By the end of the month, one six-car train was operating in revenue service. Schedule The pilot cars and two production cars continued testing and operation in Since late January all carshells are in Philadelphia, with revenue service, and also served for 72 carshells at the final assembly facility, and 38 shells operator and maintainer training. The stored at the Philadelphia port due to lack of storage last car is scheduled to be delivered in space at the Weccacoe plant. Three production cars December 2011. were delivered to SEPTA during February, where they will undergo final testing. Costs Payments to UTS total $71.6M. Progress at the Philadelphia final assembly facility Construction All 120 carshells have been completed remains slow, although improvements have been and shipped to Philadelphia. -
Transportation Trips, Excursions, Special Journeys, Outings, Tours, and Milestones In, To, from Or Through New Jersey
TRANSPORTATION TRIPS, EXCURSIONS, SPECIAL JOURNEYS, OUTINGS, TOURS, AND MILESTONES IN, TO, FROM OR THROUGH NEW JERSEY Bill McKelvey, Editor, Updated to Mon., Mar. 8, 2021 INTRODUCTION This is a reference work which we hope will be useful to historians and researchers. For those researchers wanting to do a deeper dive into the history of a particular event or series of events, copious resources are given for most of the fantrips, excursions, special moves, etc. in this compilation. You may find it much easier to search for the RR, event, city, etc. you are interested in than to read the entire document. We also think it will provide interesting, educational, and sometimes entertaining reading. Perhaps it will give ideas to future fantrip or excursion leaders for trips which may still be possible. In any such work like this there is always the question of what to include or exclude or where to draw the line. Our first thought was to limit this work to railfan excursions, but that soon got broadened to include rail specials for the general public and officials, special moves, trolley trips, bus outings, waterway and canal journeys, etc. The focus has been on such trips which operated within NJ; from NJ; into NJ from other states; or, passed through NJ. We have excluded regularly scheduled tourist type rides, automobile journeys, air trips, amusement park rides, etc. NOTE: Since many of the following items were taken from promotional literature we can not guarantee that each and every trip was actually operated. Early on the railways explored and promoted special journeys for the public as a way to improve their bottom line.