CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE Rhe STONE

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE Rhe STONE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE rHE STONE CIRCLES OF IRELAND \) A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the · requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Anthropology by Ellen Gail Boatwright June, 1979 The Thesis of Ellen Gail Boabvright is approved: Mrchael~west Antonio Gilman California State University, Northridge ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express my sincere gratitude and appreci­ ation to Antonio Gilman for his guidance and assistance throughout the writing of this thesis and to Louis Tartaglia and Michael West for their helpful sugg-estions. My thanks to Robert Kuboshima, who expertly drew and professionally assembled the maps of the Boggeragh and Sperrin mountains, Figures 59 and 60, from my rough drafts. Special thanks to my husband, Bob, and children, Pam and Craig, whose patience and understanding made possible the completion of this· project. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . iii LIST OF TABLES vii LIST OF FIGURES viii ABSTRACT xi INTRODUCTION . 1 Chapter I. SPECULATIVE PERIOD AND SUCCEEDING THEORETICAL PARADIGMS . • • • 6 Speculative Period . • • . • • . 6 Early Prehistoric Studies in Britain 6 Early Prehistoric Studies in Ireland 9 Diffusionist Paradigm ( 189 5-19 25) . • 12 Modified Diffusionist Paradigm (1925-1965). • . • • • • . 14 Independent Invention/Functionalist Paradigm ( 19 65-Present) . • . 19 II. CULTURAL CONTEXT OF THE IRISH STONE CIRCLES .•...•.• 26 The Ecology . • • 27 The Mesolithic . • . • • • • • • 30 The Neolithic . • • . • • • 32 Habitation Sites . • • • • 32 Megalithic Tombs . 38 The Early Bronze Age . • • . • • 46 The Beaker Folk . • • • • • • . 46 Metallurgy . • . • • 47 Round Cairns . • • . • • • 51 Standing Stones • • . • • 53 Stone Circles . • • • • • . • • 54 Conclusion . • • • • 55 iv Chapter III. DESCRIPTION OF SITES BY GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION . • • • • • • • • • • • 57 Southwest Ireland 58 Western Ireland . 65 Eastern Ireland 67 Northern Ireland 70 Discuss ion • • . 74 IV. -PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CIRCLES 78 Thorn's Metrology and Geometry . • • • • 79 Geometry and. Construction • • • • • 81 Discussion . • . • • • • • • • • 84 Analysis by Diameter, Nlmber of Stones and Associated Features . • • • • • 93 Conclusions • • • • • • • • • . • • • 109 . v. ARCHAEOASTRONOMICAL THEORY • 112 Introduction • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 112 Astronomical Observations • • • • • • 117 Solar Observations . • • • • 117 Lunar Observations . • • • • • • • • 120 Stellar Observations . • . • . • • • 127 Methodology of Archaeoastronomical Studies . • • . • • • • • • • • ·129 Alexander Thorn • . • . • • • • • 129 John Edwin Wood . • . • • • • . • • 133 Gerald Hawkins . • • • • 135 Jonathan Reyman . • • • • • 138 Cork and Kerry Recumbent Stone Circle Alignments . • • • • • • • • • 140 Conclusion . • • • • • • . • • • • • 145 VI. THE CIRCLES AS CEREMONIAL SITES: IMPLICATIONS FOR SOCIAL ORGANIZATION 147 Small-Scale Societies • • • • • • 149 Social Organization • • • • • • 149 Ceremonies . • • . • • • • • • • • • 151 Ceremonial Structures . • • • • . 152 Cooperation, Competition or Autonomy: Models of Social Interaction . • • 155 Distribution and Social Organization • • . 157 Cork and Kerry Circles • . • • • • • • • 157 Western Circles • • • • • • • • • • • • 161 v Eastern Circles . • . • • 162 Northern Circles . 162 Summary and Conclusion • • • 165 CONCLUSION 167 REFERENCES . 171 APPENDIX • 180 vi LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Approximate Beginning Dates for Irish Epochs 4 2. Climate and Vegetation History from Pollen Analysis . 29 3. Radiocarbon Dates for the Neolithic 34 4. Radiocarbon Dates for the Bronze Age 49 5. Diameters of Irish Stone Circles in Meters and Megalithic Yards 86 6. Irish Stone Circles, Physical Characteristics and Associated Features . • • • • • • • • • 94 7. Diameters of Irish Stone Circles • . 103 8. Numbers of Stones in Irish Stone Circles ,, . 103 9. Circles of 30 m or More 104 10. Associated Features of the Stone Circles • . 105 11. The Sixteen-Month Bronze Age Calendar .• 119 12. Declination in Terms of Azimuth, Altitude, and Latitude . • • • • • • . • ••• ~ • 132 13. Refraction as a Function of Observed Altitude •••.•••• • 137 14. Semi diameter and Parallax of the Sun and !'·1oon. • 137 15. Extreme Declination of the Sun and Moon • 138 16. Azimuth and Declination of Cork Circles from Barber's Study ••••••••.••••• 142 vii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Map of the Counties and Provinces of Ireland . • . 181 2. Distribution of Stone Circles in the British Isles . 182 3. Bristlecone-pine Calibration Done by Hans E. Suess . • . • • 183 4. The New Chronology 184 5. Distribution Maps: a. Extent and Effects of Most Recent Glaciation b. Mineral Resources c. Plants of Lusitanian and North American Origin d. Peat Deposits .••••••••....• 185 6. Flint Implements and Neolithic Pottery Sherd . ~ 186 7. Axeheads, Stages of Manufacture • 187 8. Distribution of Tievebulliagh Axeheads 188 9. Neolithic Houses, Plans ..• 189 10. Lough Gur Pottery, Classes I, Ia, II 190 11. Distribution of Plain Round-base Neolithic Pottery . 191 12. Radiocarbon Dates for Neolithic Pottery Styles in Southern England and Northern Ireland . 192 13. Radiocarbon Dates for Earthen Long Barrows and Chambered Tombs . • • 193 14. Knowth Basin Stone 194 viii Figure 15. New Grange Entrance Stone and Roof-box 195 16. Fine Beaker Ware 196 17. Early Bronze Age Gold Ornaments 197 18. Axehead Hold 198 19. Bronze Age Pottery 199 20. Typical Grave-goods of Megalithic Tombs 200 21. Bowl Food Vessel Burial from Cist at Carrickinah, Co. Down • • . • • • • 201 22. Grave Group in Cist, Kilskeery, Corkragh, Co. Tyrone • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • 202 2 3. Distribution of Stone Circles in Southwest Ireland 203 24. Drombeg, Co. Cork . 204 25. Reanascreena, Co. Cork • . .. 205 26. Plans of Four Stone Circles in Cork 206 27. Lisivigeen, Co. Kerry 207 28. The Lios, Co. Limerick 208 29. Plan of the Lios, Co. Limerick . 209 30. Athgreany, Co. Wicklow •••• 210 31. Plans of Three Stone Circles in Wicklow 211 32. Ballynoe, Co. Down • 212 33. Millin Bay, Co. Down • 213 34. New Grange Stone Circle, Co. Meath • 214 35. Beaghmore, Co. Tyrone 215 36. Plan of Circles at Beaghmore, Co. Tyrone •• 216 37. Graph of Diameters and Circumferences in Megalithic Yards • • •••••••• 217 ix Figure 38. Flattened Circles, Types A and B •. 218 39. Ellipse, Postbridge 219 40. A Type I Egg-shaped Circle, Woodhenge 220 41. A Type II Egg-shaped Circle, Borrowston Rig . 221 42. Avebury, Geometry of the Circle 222 43. The Celestial Sphere 223 44. The Sun's Daily Movement Through the Sky . 223 45. Celestial Equator and the Ecliptic . 224 46. The Sun at Summer Solstice 225 47. The Sun at Winter Solstice 226 48. The Sun at the Equinoxes . 227 49. Diagram of Internal Structure of New Grange 228 50. Histogram of Observed Declinations 229 51. Phases of the Moon . • 230 52. Movements of the Moon 231 53. The Moon at Major Standstill 232 54. The Moon at Minor Standstill • . 233 55. Northern and "southern Extremes of the Moon at Major Standstill . • • . 234 56. Northern and Southern Extremes of the Moon at Minor Standstill . • . • . 235 57. Major and Minor Standstills at Winter Solstice 236 58. Solar and Lunar Extremes in Azimuth 237 59. Boggeragh Mountains, Co. Cork 159 60. Sperrin Mountains, Cos. Londonderry and Tyrone . • . • . • • . • . • • • . • . • • 163 X ABSTRACT THE STONE CIRCLES OF IRELAND by Ellen Gail Boatwright Master of Arts in Anthropology This thesis is primarily an overview of the Irish stone circles. Successive paradigms by which they have been interpreted have been examined. Their Late Neolithic and Early Bronze Age cultural contexts have been discussed. The circles have been described and their physical charac­ teristics, diameter and number of stones, and their associated features analyzed. Two hypothesized primary functions have been examined, that of astronomical observa­ tory and that of religious-ceremonial site. It was con­ cluded that the circles were not constructed to serve primarily as astronomical observatories, but rather that an astronomical orientation, present at many of the sites, indicates that observance of midwinter solstice was prob­ ably an integral part of the religion of their builders. xi A religious-ceremonial function was found to be the more likely primary function for the majority of the circles. Analysis was made of the distribution of the circles in relation to three models of social interaction (coopera­ tion, competition, or autonomy) among basic population units (extended families) and inferences drawn concerning the social organization of the builders. It was concluded that no one model alone could explain the distribution of the circles, but that different processes were operating in different areas in a transitional social evolutionary stage between the more egalitarian Neolithic and more hierarchi­ cal Middle Bronze Age. xii INTRODUC'riON The stone circles of Ireland (map, Figure 1) are a type of megalithic structure or monument. The term mega- lithic refers to the massive stones used in these construe- tions, built without the use of mortar, rather than to any particular group of people who constructed such monuments. Many peoples have built megalithic structures. Megalithic monuments in Europe consist of tombs (dolmens), single standing stones (menhirs), and stone circles. When one speaks of stone circles, Stoneheng.e, because it is so well known, immediately comes to mind. There is, however, a distinction between henges and stone circles. A stone circle is usually defined as a ring of stanq~ng.stones
Recommended publications
  • Pottery Technology As a Revealer of Cultural And
    Pottery technology as a revealer of cultural and symbolic shifts: Funerary and ritual practices in the Sion ‘Petit-Chasseur’ megalithic necropolis (3100–1600 BC, Western Switzerland) Eve Derenne, Vincent Ard, Marie Besse To cite this version: Eve Derenne, Vincent Ard, Marie Besse. Pottery technology as a revealer of cultural and symbolic shifts: Funerary and ritual practices in the Sion ‘Petit-Chasseur’ megalithic necropolis (3100–1600 BC, Western Switzerland). Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, Elsevier, 2020, 58, pp.101170. 10.1016/j.jaa.2020.101170. hal-03051558 HAL Id: hal-03051558 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03051558 Submitted on 10 Dec 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 58 (2020) 101170 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Anthropological Archaeology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jaa Pottery technology as a revealer of cultural and symbolic shifts: Funerary and ritual practices in the Sion ‘Petit-Chasseur’ megalithic necropolis T (3100–1600 BC,
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation Into Bridge Usage by Bats Within the Sullane & Laney
    An Investigation into Bridge Usage by Bats within the Sullane & Laney River Catchments, Co. Cork Report prepared by Mark Masterson, Daniel Buckley, Mary O’Brien and Conor Kelleher of the Cork County Bat Group for The Heritage Council & National Parks and Wildlife Service March 2008 An Investigation into Bridge Usage by Bats within the Sullane & Laney River Catchments, Co. Cork Report prepared by Mark Masterson, Daniel Buckley, Mary O’Brien & Conor Kelleher of the Cork County Bat Group for The Heritage Council & National Parks and Wildlife Service March 2008 An Investigation into Bridge Usage by Bats within the Sullane & Laney River Catchments, Co. Cork 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................................................. 1 ABSTRACT................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 3 1.1 Project aims .......................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Cork County Bat Group ....................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Bats and bridges .................................................................................................................. 4 1.4 Previous bridge
    [Show full text]
  • The Prehistoric Burial Sites of Northern Ireland
    The Prehistoric Burial Sites of Northern Ireland Harry and June Welsh Archaeopress Archaeology Archaeopress Gordon House 276 Banbury Road Oxford OX2 7ED www.archaeopress.com ISBN 978 1 78491 006 8 ISBN 978 1 78491 007 5 (e-Pdf) © Archaeopress, H and J Welsh 2014 Cover photo: portal tomb, Ballykeel in County Armagh All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners. Printed in England by CMP (UK) Ltd This book is available direct from Archaeopress or from our website www.archaeopress.com Contents Introduction �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1 Background and acknowledgements ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1 A short history of prehistoric archaeology in northern ireland ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1 Northern ireland’s prehistory in context....................................................................................................................... 3 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Classifications used in the inventory............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Friday, the 19Th of June 09:00 Garcia Sanjuan, Leonardo the Hole in the Doughnut
    monumental landscapes neolithic subsistence and megaliths 09:25 schiesberg, sara; zimmermann, andreas 10:40 coffee break siemens lecture hall bosch conference room Stages and Cycles: The Demography of Populations Practicing 11:00 schiesberg, sara Collective Burials Theories, Methods and Results The Bone Puzzle. Reconstructing Burial Rites in Collective Tombs 09:00 schmitt, felicitas; bartelheim, martin; bueno ramírez, primitiva 09:00 o’connell, michael 09:50 rinne, christoph; fuchs, katharina; kopp, juliane; 11:25 cummings, vicki Just passing by? Investigating in the Territory of the Megalith Builders The pollen evidence for early prehistoric farming impact: towards a better schade-lindig, sabine; susat, julian; krause-kyora, ben The social implications of construction: a consideration of the earliest of the Southern European Plains. The Case of Azután, Toledo. understanding of the archaeological fi eld evidence for Neolithic activity in Niedertiefenbach reloaded: The builders of the Wartberg gallery grave Neolithic monuments of Britain and Ireland 09:25 carrero pazos, miguel; rodríguez casal, antón a. western Ireland 10:15 klingner, susan; schultz, michael 11:50 pollard, joshua Neolithic Territory and Funeral Megalithic Space in Galicia (Nw. Of 09:25 diers, sarah; fritsch, barbara The physical strain on megalithic tomb builders from northern How routine life was made sacred: settlement and monumentality in Iberian Peninsula): A Synthetic Approach Changing environments in a Megalithic Landscape: the Altmark case Germany –results of an
    [Show full text]
  • Ritual Landscapes and Borders Within Rock Art Research Stebergløkken, Berge, Lindgaard and Vangen Stuedal (Eds)
    Stebergløkken, Berge, Lindgaard and Vangen Stuedal (eds) and Vangen Lindgaard Berge, Stebergløkken, Art Research within Rock and Borders Ritual Landscapes Ritual Landscapes and Ritual landscapes and borders are recurring themes running through Professor Kalle Sognnes' Borders within long research career. This anthology contains 13 articles written by colleagues from his broad network in appreciation of his many contributions to the field of rock art research. The contributions discuss many different kinds of borders: those between landscapes, cultures, Rock Art Research traditions, settlements, power relations, symbolism, research traditions, theory and methods. We are grateful to the Department of Historical studies, NTNU; the Faculty of Humanities; NTNU, Papers in Honour of The Royal Norwegian Society of Sciences and Letters and The Norwegian Archaeological Society (Norsk arkeologisk selskap) for funding this volume that will add new knowledge to the field and Professor Kalle Sognnes will be of importance to researchers and students of rock art in Scandinavia and abroad. edited by Heidrun Stebergløkken, Ragnhild Berge, Eva Lindgaard and Helle Vangen Stuedal Archaeopress Archaeology www.archaeopress.com Steberglokken cover.indd 1 03/09/2015 17:30:19 Ritual Landscapes and Borders within Rock Art Research Papers in Honour of Professor Kalle Sognnes edited by Heidrun Stebergløkken, Ragnhild Berge, Eva Lindgaard and Helle Vangen Stuedal Archaeopress Archaeology Archaeopress Publishing Ltd Gordon House 276 Banbury Road Oxford OX2 7ED www.archaeopress.com ISBN 9781784911584 ISBN 978 1 78491 159 1 (e-Pdf) © Archaeopress and the individual authors 2015 Cover image: Crossing borders. Leirfall in Stjørdal, central Norway. Photo: Helle Vangen Stuedal All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners.
    [Show full text]
  • & Autres Terres Celtiques
    BRETAGNE & autres Terres celtiques Jean-Louis Pressensé, libraire Catalogue 48 Décembre 2013 1 Jean-Louis Pressensé, libraire Catalogue 48 Généralités, macédoines, etc. BRETAGNE & 1. (Celtomanes , Antiquaires & Bretonistes) Académie celti- que. Collectif. Mémoires de l'Académie celtique, ou Re- AUTRES TERRES cherches sur les Antiquités celtiques, gauloises et françaises. I/V. P., Dubray. 1807-08-09-09-10. 4 vol. in-8°, sobres rel. 1/2 bas. + 1 vol. in-8° débroché (sous couv. fact.), de CELTIQUES (3)+20+440pp & 6 pl. h-t., (6)+474pp & 7 pl. h-t dt 1 dépl., 504pp & 3 dépl. h-t, 508pp & 5 pl. dt 3 dépl., 520pp & 5 pl. dépl. h-t. ; Généralités 001-056 mouill. passim, ensemble disparate mais rarissime, surtout Nos ancêtres les Mégalithiques 057-074 complet de ses vingt-six planches gravées 900 € Indo-Européens et Celtes 075-233 A partir du t. III le titre devient : Mémoires de l'Acad. Celtique, ou Bretagne & Bretons 234-482 Mémoires d'antiquités celtiques… Dont : Moyen Age 407-457 Brittany 483-507 2. (Celtomanes , Antiquaires & Bretonistes) Académie celti- Vieille langue de nos Pères 508-631 que. Collectif. Mémoires de l'Académie celtique [ou Mé- Les Celtes parlent aux Celtes 632-664 moires d'antiquités celtiques, gauloises et françaises]. Tome Chrétientés celtiques (médiévales) 665-722 III complet en 3 livraisons. P., Dubray. 1809. 3 fasc. in-8° Cymru, Pays de Galles 723-756 brochés, couv. impr., de 504pp (pagin. continu), 3 pl. gravées h.- Kernow, Cornouailles 757-764 t., index ; beaux ex. ; contrib. Johanneau, Lenoir, Legonidec, Erin, Irlande 765-841 Mangourit, Baudouin (de Maisonblanche), Rallier, Pictet… 150 € Alba, Ecosse 842-892 Linguistique, philologie 893-941 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Neolithic and Earlier Bronze Age Key Sites Southeast Wales – Neolithic
    A Research Framework for the Archaeology of Wales Key Sites, Southeast Wales, 22/12/2003 Neolithic and earlier Bronze Age Key Sites Southeast Wales – Neolithic and early Bronze Age 22/12/2003 Neolithic Domestic COED-Y-CWMDDA Enclosure with evidence for flint-working Owen-John 1988 CEFN GLAS (SN932024) Late Neolithic hut floor dated to 4110-70 BP. Late Neolithic flints have been found at this site. Excavated 1973 Unpublished: see Grimes 1984 PEN-Y-BONT, OGMORE (SS863756) Pottery, hearth and flints Hamilton and Aldhouse-Green 1998; 1999; Gibson 1998 MOUNT PLEASANT, NEWTON NOTTAGE (SS83387985) Hut, hearth, pottery Savory 1952; RCAHMW 1976a CEFN CILSANWS HUT SITE (SO02480995) Hut consisting of 46 stake holes found under cairn. The hut contained fragments of Mortlake style Peterborough Ware and flint flakes Webley 1958; RCAHMW 1997 CEFN BRYN 10 (GREAT CARN) SAM Gml96 (SS49029055) Trench, pit, posthole and hearth associated with Peterborough ware and worked flint; found under cairn. Ward 1987 Funerary and ritual CEFN BRYN BURIAL CHAMBER (NICHOLASTON) SAM Gml67 (SS50758881) Partly excavated chambered tomb, with an orthostatic chamber surviving in a roughly central position in what remains of a long mound. The mound was made up peaty soil and stone fragments, and no trace of an entrance passage was found. The chamber had been robbed at some time before the excavation. Williams 1940, 178-81 CEFN DRUM CHAMBERED TOMB (SN61360453,) Discovered during the course of the excavation of a deserted medieval settlement on Cefn Drum. A pear-shaped chamber of coursed rubble construction, with an attached orthostatic passage ending in a pit in the mouth of a hornwork and containing cremated bone and charcoal, were identified within the remains of a mound with some stone kerbing.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Tell a Cromlech from a Quoit ©
    How to tell a cromlech from a quoit © As you might have guessed from the title, this article looks at different types of Neolithic or early Bronze Age megaliths and burial mounds, with particular reference to some well-known examples in the UK. It’s also a quick overview of some of the terms used when describing certain types of megaliths, standing stones and tombs. The definitions below serve to illustrate that there is little general agreement over what we could classify as burial mounds. Burial mounds, cairns, tumuli and barrows can all refer to man- made hills of earth or stone, are located globally and may include all types of standing stones. A barrow is a mound of earth that covers a burial. Sometimes, burials were dug into the original ground surface, but some are found placed in the mound itself. The term, barrow, can be used for British burial mounds of any period. However, round barrows can be dated to either the Early Bronze Age or the Saxon period before the conversion to Christianity, whereas long barrows are usually Neolithic in origin. So, what is a megalith? A megalith is a large stone structure or a group of standing stones - the term, megalith means great stone, from two Greek words, megas (meaning: great) and lithos (meaning: stone). However, the general meaning of megaliths includes any structure composed of large stones, which include tombs and circular standing structures. Such structures have been found in Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia, North and South America and may have had religious significance. Megaliths tend to be put into two general categories, ie dolmens or menhirs.
    [Show full text]
  • Stone-Cist Grave at Kaseküla, Western Estonia, in the Light of Ams Dates of the Human Bones
    Estonian Journal of Archaeology, 2012, 16, 2, 91–117 doi: 10.3176/arch.2012.2.01 Margot Laneman STONE-CIST GRAVE AT KASEKÜLA, WESTERN ESTONIA, IN THE LIGHT OF AMS DATES OF THE HUMAN BONES The article discusses new AMS dates of the human bones at stone-cist grave I at Kaseküla, western Estonia, in the context of previously existent radiocarbon dates, artefact finds and osteological studies. There are altogether 12 radiocarbon dates for 10 inhumations (i.e. roughly a third of all burials) of the grave, provided by two laboratories. The dates suggest three temporally separated periods in the use life of the grave(s): the Late Bronze Age, the Pre-Roman Iron Age and the Late Iron Age. In the latter period, the grave was probably reserved for infant burials only. Along with chronological issues, the article discusses the apparently unusual structure of the grave and compares two competing osteological studies of the grave’s bone assemblage from an archaeologist’s point of view. Margot Laneman, Institute of History and Archaeology, University of Tartu, 18 Ülikooli St., 50090 Tartu, Estonia; [email protected] Introduction The main aim of this article is to present and discuss new radiocarbon (AMS) dates of the human bones collected from stone-cist grave I at Kaseküla, western Estonia. The stone-cist grave was excavated by Mati Mandel in 1973 with the purpose of specifying the settlement history of the region (Mandel 1975). So far it has remained the only excavated stone-cist grave in mainland western Estonia (Mandel 2003, fig. 20). Excavation also uncovered a Late Neolithic settlement site beneath the grave, which was further investigated by Aivar Kriiska in 1997 (Kriiska et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Template Normal Planning Appeal
    Inspector’s Report ABP-306647-20 Development Construction of a crematorium and all associated site works and landscaping including decommissioning of existing waste water treatment system and provision of new waste water treatment system, new car parking and circulation, removal of the entrance gateposts, alterations to entrances at existing locations to create one dedicated entrance and one dedicated exit. Location The former Duhallow Park Hotel site, Drumcummer Beg, Kanturk, Co. Cork. Planning Authority Cork County Council Planning Authority Reg. Ref. 18/06880 Applicant(s) Classic Lodges (Ireland) Ltd Type of Application Permission Planning Authority Decision Refusal Type of Appeal First Party -v- Decision ABP-306647-20 Inspector’s Report Page 1 of 36 Appellant(s) Classic Lodges (Ireland) Ltd Observer(s) John Murphy The Island Crematorium Ltd Dromcummer Residents’ Association Date of Site Inspection 21st May 2020 Inspector Hugh D. Morrison ABP-306647-20 Inspector’s Report Page 2 of 36 Contents 1.0 Site Location and Description .............................................................................. 4 2.0 Proposed Development ....................................................................................... 4 3.0 Planning Authority Decision ................................................................................. 6 Decision ........................................................................................................ 6 Planning Authority Reports ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Neolithic and Early Bronze Age
    THE NEOLITHIC AND EARLY BRONZE AGE IN THE FIRTH OF CLYDE ISOBEL MARY HUGHES VOLUMEI Thesis submitted for the degree of Ph. D. Department of Archaeology The University of Glasgow October 1987 0 Isobel M Hughes, 1987. In memory of my mother, and of my father - John Gervase Riddell M. A., D. D., one time Professor of Divinity, University of Glasgow. 7727 LJ r'- I 1GLASGOW UNIVERSITY LIBRARY i CONTENTS i " VOLUME I LIST OF TABLES xii LIST OF FIGURES xvi LIST OF PLATES xix ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS xx SUMMARY xxii PREFACE xxiv CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Field of Enquiry 1.2 Approaches to a Social Archaeology 1.2.1 Introduction 1.2.2 Understanding Change 1.2.3 The Nature of the Evidence 1.2.4 Megalithic Cairns and Neolithic Society 1.2.5 Monuments -a Lasting Impression 1.2.6 The Emergence of Individual Power 1.3 Aims, Objectives and Methodology 11 ý1 t ii CHAPTER2 AREA OF STUDY - PHYSICAL FEATURES 20 2.1 Location and Extent 2.2 Definition 2.3 Landforms 2.3.1 Introduction 2.3.2 Highland and Island 2.3.3 Midland Valley 2.3.4 Southern Upland 2.3.5 Climate 2.4 Aspects of the Environment in Prehistory 2.4.1 Introduction 2.4.2 Raised Beach Formation 2.4.3 Vegetation 2.4.4 Climate 2.4.5 Soils CHAPTER 3 FORMATION OF THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORD 38 3.1 Introduction 3.1.1 Definition 3.1.2 Initiation 3.1.3 Social and Economic Change iii 3.2 Period before 1780 3.2.1 The Archaeological Record 3.2.2 Social and Economic Development 3.3 Period 1780 - 1845 3.3.1 The Archaeological Record 3.3.2 Social and Economic Development 3.4 Period 1845 - 1914 3.4.1 Social and Economic
    [Show full text]
  • Behind the Scenes
    ©Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd 689 Behind the Scenes SEND US YOUR FEEDBACK We love to hear from travellers – your comments keep us on our toes and help make our books better. Our well-travelled team reads every word on what you loved or loathed about this book. Although we cannot reply individually to your submissions, we always guarantee that your feedback goes straight to the appropriate authors, in time for the next edition. Each person who sends us information is thanked in the next edition – the most useful submissions are rewarded with a selection of digital PDF chapters. Visit lonelyplanet.com/contact to submit your updates and suggestions or to ask for help. Our award-winning website also features inspirational travel stories, news and discussions. Note: We may edit, reproduce and incorporate your comments in Lonely Planet products such as guidebooks, websites and digital products, so let us know if you don’t want your comments reproduced or your name acknowledged. For a copy of our privacy policy visit lonelyplanet.com/ privacy. Anthony Sheehy, Mike at the Hunt Museum, OUR READERS Steve Whitfield, Stevie Winder, Ann in Galway, Many thanks to the travellers who used the anonymous farmer who pointed the way to the last edition and wrote to us with help- Knockgraffon Motte and all the truly delightful ful hints, useful advice and interesting people I met on the road who brought sunshine anecdotes: to the wettest of Irish days. Thanks also, as A Andrzej Januszewski, Annelise Bak C Chris always, to Daisy, Tim and Emma. Keegan, Colin Saunderson, Courtney Shucker D Denis O’Sullivan J Jack Clancy, Jacob Catherine Le Nevez Harris, Jane Barrett, Joe O’Brien, John Devitt, Sláinte first and foremost to Julian, and to Joyce Taylor, Juliette Tirard-Collet K Karen all of the locals, fellow travellers and tourism Boss, Katrin Riegelnegg L Laura Teece, Lavin professionals en route for insights, information Graviss, Luc Tétreault M Marguerite Harber, and great craic.
    [Show full text]