DOCSLIB.ORG

Calabi-Yau Threefolds and Heterotic String Compactification

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Calabi-Yau Threefolds and Heterotic String Compactification Calabi-Yau Threefolds and Heterotic String Compactification Rhys Davies University College University of Oxford A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Trinity Term 2010 Calabi-Yau Threefolds and Heterotic String Compactification Rhys Davies University College University of Oxford A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Trinity Term 2010 This thesis is concerned with Calabi-Yau threefolds and vector bundles upon them, which are the basic mathematical objects at the centre of smooth supersymmetric compactifications of heterotic string theory. We begin by explaining how these objects arise in physics, and give a brief review of the techniques of algebraic geometry which are used to construct and study them. We then turn to studying multiply-connected Calabi-Yau threefolds, which are of particular importance for realistic string compactifications. We construct a large number of new examples via free group actions on complete intersection Calabi-Yau manifolds (CICY's). For special values of the parameters, these group actions develop fixed points, and we show that, on the quotient spaces, this leads to a particular class of singularities, which are quotients of the conifold. We demonstrate that, in many cases at least, such a singularity can be resolved to yield another smooth Calabi-Yau threefold, with different Hodge numbers and fundamental group. This is a new example of the interconnectedness of the moduli spaces of distinct Calabi-Yau threefolds. In the second part of the thesis we turn to a study of two new `three-generation' manifolds, constructed as quotients of a particular CICY, which can also be represented as a hypersurface in dP6×dP6, where dP6 is the del Pezzo surface of degree six. After describing the geometry of this manifold, and especially its non-Abelian quotient, in detail, we show how to construct on the quotient manifolds vector bundles which lead to four-dimensional heterotic models with the standard model gauge group and three generations of particles. The example described in detail has the spectrum of the minimal supersymmetric standard model plus a single vector-like pair of colour triplets. Acknowledgements I have been lucky to benefit from the help and support of many people before and during my time at Oxford, and I am grateful to all of them, but I would particularly like to acknowledge the following people. • Most of all I thank my wife Emma, whose endless love and encouragement motivates and strengthens me in all pursuits. • A special thank-you goes to my parents Pam and Owen, who have always supported and encouraged me, even though my choices have taken me half a world away from them. • I thank my supervisors and collaborators Andre Lukas, Xenia de la Ossa, Philip Candelas, Volker Braun and Ron Donagi. They have taught me a great deal, and this thesis would not have come to be without their help. I also thank Mark Gross, Bal´azsSzendr}oiand Duco van Straten for sharing with me some of their expertise in algebraic geometry. • I would like to thank everybody with whom I have talked informally about physics and mathematics during my D.Phil., but especially Matt McCullough. Such discussions, espe- cially over cups of coffee or pints of ale, have been an invaluable and immensely enjoyable part of the whole experience. • Finally, I would like to acknowledge the financial support of the Sir Arthur Sims Travelling Scholarship, from the University of Melbourne, and the Oxford-Australia University College Old Members' Scholarship. Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Aspects of Algebraic Geometry 7 2.1 Divisors and line bundles . .8 2.1.1 Divisors . .8 2.1.2 Holomorphic line bundles . .9 2.2 Holomorphic vector bundles and their cohomology . 10 2.2.1 Bundles on hypersurfaces . 11 2.2.2 Projective space . 12 2.3 Singularities and resolutions . 14 2.3.1 Blowing up . 14 2.3.2 Resolution of singularities . 15 2.3.3 The conifold, and conifold transitions . 16 2.4 Toric geometry . 17 2.4.1 Affine toric varieties . 18 2.4.2 Fans and toric varieties . 19 2.4.3 Homogeneous coordinates . 20 2.4.4 Toric geometry and Calabi-Yau manifolds . 22 3 New Calabi-Yau Manifolds with Small Hodge Numbers 23 3.1 Overview: CICY's and quotient manifolds . 23 3.1.1 Splitting and Contraction . 24 3.1.2 Configurations and diagrams . 27 3.1.3 Calculation of the Euler characteristic and Hodge numbers . 28 3.1.4 Checking transversality of the defining equations . 29 3.1.5 Webs of CICY's with freely acting symmetries . 30 3.2 Some examples of free actions by Z5 ......................... 45 3.2.1 X2;52; a split of the quintic threefold . 45 3.2.2 X7;27; a further split of the quintic . 46 3.3 Some manifolds admitting free actions by Z3 .................... 48 3;48 2 3.3.1 X ; a P split of the bicubic . 48 3.3.2 X4;40; a second split of the bicubic . 51 5 1;73 3.3.3 P [3; 3] .................................... 52 3.3.4 X3;39; splitting the two cubics . 53 3.3.5 X9;27; a second split of both cubics . 56 3.3.6 X5;50; a one-sided split of X1;73 ........................ 59 3.3.7 X8;44 ....................................... 60 3.3.8 The manifold X19;19 .............................. 66 3.4 Some manifolds with quaternionic symmetry . 66 7 3.4.1 The manifold P [2222]............................ 66 5;37 7 3.4.2 X , a symmetrical split of P [2 2 2 2] . 67 3.4.3 X4;68|the tetraquadric . 68 1;1 2;1 3.4.4 An H quotient of the manifold with (h ; h ) = (19; 19) . 69 4 Hyperconifold Singularities 71 4.1 A Z5 example . 73 4.1.1 The conifold and Z5-hyperconifold as toric varieties . 74 4.2 Local hyperconifold singularities in general . 75 4.2.1 Analysis of fixed points . 75 4.2.2 The hyperconifolds torically . 76 4.2.3 Topology of the singularities . 80 4.3 Global resolutions . 80 4.3.1 Blowing up a node . 80 4.3.2 The toric picture, and the Z2-hyperconifold . 81 4.3.3 The Z2M -hyperconifolds . 83 4.4 Hyperconifold transitions in string theory? . 85 5 New Three-Generation Manifolds 88 5.1 A manifold with a χ = −6 quotient . 88 5.1.1 The quotient manifold . 89 5.1.2 The group representations of Dic3 ...................... 93 5.1.3 Group action on homology . 93 5.2 Symmetries of X and XG ............................... 95 5.2.1 Symmetries of dP6×dP6 ............................ 96 5.2.2 Symmetries of the quotient . 96 5.3 Conifold transition to a manifold with (h1;1; h2;1) = (2; 2) . 99 5.3.1 The parameter space of 3-nodal quotients XG ................ 99 5.3.2 The nodes and their resolution . 100 5.3.3 Identifying the (2; 2) manifold with a quotient of X19;19 .......... 103 5.4 Toric considerations and the mirror manifold . 104 5.4.1 The Newton polyhedron and its dual . 104 5.4.2 Triangulations . 107 5.4.3 The mirror manifold . 110 5.5 The Abelian quotient . 113 5.5.1 Group action on homology . 113 5.6 Alternative representations . 113 5.6.1 The non-Abelian quotient . 114 5.6.2 The Z12 quotient . 114 6 Semi-Realistic Heterotic Models 115 6.1 Bundle deformations and the low-energy theory . 116 6.2 The deformed bundle . 117 6.2.1 Bundle stability and deformations . 118 6.2.2 Equivariant structures . 120 6.2.3 Constructing bundle deformations . 121 6.3 Calculating the cohomology/spectrum . 125 6.3.1 Calculating n10 and n10 ............................ 125 6.3.2 Calculating n5 and n5 ............................. 126 6.3.3 Group action on cohomology, and the low-energy spectrum . 128 6.4 Models on the Z12 quotient . 130 6.4.1 Wilson line breaking of SU(5)GUT ...................... 131 6.4.2 Bundle deformations and the spectrum . 131 6.5 Moduli stabilisation . 133 6.6 Summary . 134 A Cohomology Calculations 135 A.1 Cohomology on dP6 .................................. 135 A.1.1 The tangent bundle and related bundles . 135 A.2 Cohomology on X8;44 ................................. 137 A.2.1 Some cohomologies . 138 A.2.2 Deformations of T X8;44 ............................ 139 1. Introduction Superstring theory has many remarkable features which set it apart from any other attempt to describe fundamental physics. The consistent quantisation of the theory requires that the dimension of spacetime is ten | no other theory makes such a prediction. The spectrum of excitations of a string contains gravitons, Yang-Mills gauge fields, and charged fermions, all of which we know are required for a sensible description of our universe. Furthermore, string theory provides field equations for the vacuum configurations of these fields, which reduce at large distances to general relativity coupled to a Yang-Mills gauge theory. It also appears that the theory is finite, and therefore makes sense at all energy scales. This striking structure makes string theory a very appealing candidate for the correct description of physics at the most fundamental level. Nevertheless, there is still a lot of work to be done to properly understand the theory itself. Various non-perturbative features have been understood, but a complete non- perturbative definition of the theory is yet to be found. At least as important as understanding the foundations of string theory is attempting to connect it directly to experiment. The big problem for this pursuit, referred to broadly as `string phenomenology', is that at low energies, string theory is typically indistinguishable from quantum field theory; quintessentially `stringy' effects only show up around the string scale.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wall Crossing and M-Theory
    Wall Crossing and M-theory The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Aganagic, Mina, Hirosi Ooguri, Cumrun Vafa, and Masahito Yamazaki. 2011. Wall crossing and M-theory. Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences 47(2): 569-584. Published Version doi:10.2977/PRIMS/44 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:7561260 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#OAP CALT-68-2746 IPMU09-0091 UT-09-18 Wall Crossing and M-Theory Mina Aganagic1, Hirosi Ooguri2,3, Cumrun Vafa4 and Masahito Yamazaki2,3,5 1Center for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 2California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 3 IPMU, University of Tokyo, Chiba 277-8586, Japan 4Jefferson Physical Laboratory, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 5Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan Abstract arXiv:0908.1194v1 [hep-th] 8 Aug 2009 We study BPS bound states of D0 and D2 branes on a single D6 brane wrapping a Calabi- Yau 3-fold X. When X has no compact 4-cyles, the BPS bound states are organized into a free field Fock space, whose generators correspond to BPS states of spinning M2 branes in M- theory compactified down to 5 dimensions by a Calabi-Yau 3-fold X.
    [Show full text]
  • Abdus Salam Educational, Scientific and Cultural XA0500266 Organization International Centre
    the united nations abdus salam educational, scientific and cultural XA0500266 organization international centre international atomic energy agency for theoretical physics 1 a M THEORY AND SINGULARITIES OF EXCEPTIONAL HOLONOMY MANIFOLDS Bobby S. Acharya and Sergei Gukov Available at: http://www.ictp.it/-pub-off IC/2004/127 HUTP-03/A053 RUNHETC-2003-26 United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization and International Atomic Energy Agency THE ABDUS SALAM INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS M THEORY AND SINGULARITIES OF EXCEPTIONAL HOLONOMY MANIFOLDS Bobby S. Acharya1 The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy and Sergei Gukov2 Jefferson Physical Laboratory, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. Abstract M theory compactifications on Gi holonomy manifolds, whilst supersymmetric, require sin- gularities in order to obtain non-Abelian gauge groups, chiral fermions and other properties necessary for a realistic model of particle physics. We review recent progress in understanding the physics of such singularities. Our main aim is to describe the techniques which have been used to develop our understanding of M theory physics near these singularities. In parallel, we also describe similar sorts of singularities in Spin(7) holonomy manifolds which correspond to the properties of three dimensional field theories. As an application, we review how various aspects of strongly coupled gauge theories, such as confinement, mass gap and non-perturbative phase transitions may be given a
    [Show full text]
  • Heterotic String Compactification with a View Towards Cosmology
    Heterotic String Compactification with a View Towards Cosmology by Jørgen Olsen Lye Thesis for the degree Master of Science (Master i fysikk) Department of Physics Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences University of Oslo May 2014 Abstract The goal is to look at what constraints there are for the internal manifold in phe- nomenologically viable Heterotic string compactification. Basic string theory, cosmology, and string compactification is sketched. I go through the require- ments imposed on the internal manifold in Heterotic string compactification when assuming vanishing 3-form flux, no warping, and maximally symmetric 4-dimensional spacetime with unbroken N = 1 supersymmetry. I review the current state of affairs in Heterotic moduli stabilisation and discuss merging cosmology and particle physics in this setup. In particular I ask what additional requirements this leads to for the internal manifold. I conclude that realistic manifolds on which to compactify in this setup are severely constrained. An extensive mathematics appendix is provided in an attempt to make the thesis more self-contained. Acknowledgements I would like to start by thanking my supervier Øyvind Grøn for condoning my hubris and for giving me free rein to delve into string theory as I saw fit. It has lead to a period of intense study and immense pleasure. Next up is my brother Kjetil, who has always been a good friend and who has been constantly looking out for me. It is a source of comfort knowing that I can always turn to him for help. Mentioning friends in such an acknowledgement is nearly mandatory. At least they try to give me that impression.
    [Show full text]
  • Vincent Bouchard – Associate Professor
    Vincent Bouchard | Associate Professor Rhodes Scholar (Québec and Magdalen, 2001) Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Alberta 632 CAB, Edmonton, AB, Canada – T6G 2G1 T +1 (780) 492 0099 • B [email protected] Í www.ualberta.ca/ vbouchar Education University of Oxford, Magdalen College Oxford, UK D.Phil. Mathematics 2001–2005 Université de Montréal Montréal, QC B.Sc. Physics, Excellence, Palmarès de la doyenne, average 4.3/4.3 1998–2001 Cégep Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, QC D.E.C. Natural Sciences, Excellence 1996–1998 D.Phil. thesis Title: Toric Geometry and String Theory [arXiv:hep-th/0609123] Supervisor: Rouse Ball Professor Philip Candelas Positions Associate Professor Edmonton, AB Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Alberta 2013–Present Assistant Professor Edmonton, AB Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Alberta 2009–2013 Postdoctoral Fellow Cambridge, MA Physics Department, Harvard University 2007–2009 NSERC Postdoctoral Fellow Waterloo, ON Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics 2006–2007 Postdoctoral Fellow Berkeley, CA Mathematical Sciences Research Institute 2006 “New Topological Structures in Physics” program, January–May Postdoctoral Fellow Phildelphia, PA Department of Mathematics, University of Pennsylvania 2005 Joint math/physics visiting position, September–December Research Grants NSERC Discovery Grant: $225,000 2013–2018 NSERC Discovery Grant: $130,000 2010–2013 University of Alberta Research
    [Show full text]
  • Open Gromov-Witten Invariants and Syz Under Local Conifold Transitions
    OPEN GROMOV-WITTEN INVARIANTS AND SYZ UNDER LOCAL CONIFOLD TRANSITIONS SIU-CHEONG LAU Abstract. For a local non-toric Calabi-Yau manifold which arises as smoothing of a toric Gorenstein singularity, this paper derives the open Gromov-Witten invariants of a generic fiber of the special Lagrangian fibration constructed by Gross and thereby constructs its SYZ mirror. Moreover it proves that the SYZ mirrors and disc potentials vary smoothly under conifold transitions, giving a global picture of SYZ mirror symmetry. 1. Introduction Let N be a lattice and P a lattice polytope in NR. It is an interesting classical problem in combinatorial geometry to construct Minkowski decompositions of P . P v On the other hand, consider the family of polynomials v2P \N cvz for cv 2 C with cv 6= 0 when v is a vertex of P . All these polynomials have P as their Newton polytopes. This establishes a relation between geometry and algebra, and the geometric problem of finding Minkowski decompositions is transformed to the algebraic problem of finding polynomial factorizations. One purpose of this paper is to show that the beautiful algebro-geometric correspondence between Minkowski decompositions and polynomial factorizations can be realized via SYZ mirror symmetry. A key step leading to the miracle is brought by a result of Altmann [3]. First of all, a lattice polytope corresponds to a toric Gorenstein singularity X. Altmann showed that Minkowski decompositions of the lattice polytope correspond to (partial) smoothings of X. From string- theoretic point of view different smoothings of X belong to different sectors of the same stringy K¨ahlermoduli.
    [Show full text]
  • Singlet Glueballs in Klebanov-Strassler Theory
    Singlet Glueballs In Klebanov-Strassler Theory A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY IVAN GORDELI IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Doctor of Philosophy ARKADY VAINSHTEIN April, 2016 c IVAN GORDELI 2016 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Acknowledgements First of all I would like to thank my scientific adviser - Arkady Vainshtein for his incredible patience and support throughout the course of my Ph.D. program. I would also like to thank my committee members for taking time to read and review my thesis, namely Ronald Poling, Mikhail Shifman and Alexander Voronov. I am deeply grateful to Vasily Pestun for his support and motivation. Same applies to my collaborators Dmitry Melnikov and Anatoly Dymarsky who have suggested this research topic to me. I am thankful to my other collaborator - Peter Koroteev. I would like to thank Emil Akhmedov, A.Yu. Morozov, Andrey Mironov, M.A. Olshanetsky, Antti Niemi, K.A. Ter-Martirosyan, M.B. Voloshin, Andrey Levin, Andrei Losev, Alexander Gorsky, S.M. Kozel, S.S. Gershtein, M. Vysotsky, Alexander Grosberg, Tony Gherghetta, R.B. Nevzorov, D.I. Kazakov, M.V. Danilov, A. Chervov and all other great teachers who have shaped everything I know about Theoretical Physics. I am deeply grateful to all my friends and colleagues who have contributed to discus- sions and supported me throughout those years including A. Arbuzov, L. Kushnir, K. Kozlova, A. Shestov, V. Averina, A. Talkachova, A. Talkachou, A. Abyzov, V. Poberezh- niy, A. Alexandrov, G. Nozadze, S. Solovyov, A. Zotov, Y. Chernyakov, N.
    [Show full text]
  • Calabi-Yau Geometry and Higher Genus Mirror Symmetry
    Calabi-Yau Geometry and Higher Genus Mirror Symmetry A dissertation presented by Si Li to The Department of Mathematics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Mathematics Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts May 2011 © 2011 { Si Li All rights reserved. iii Dissertation Advisor: Professor Shing-Tung Yau Si Li Calabi-Yau Geometry and Higher Genus Mirror Symmetry Abstract We study closed string mirror symmetry on compact Calabi-Yau manifolds at higher genus. String theory predicts the existence of two sets of geometric invariants, from the A-model and the B-model on Calabi-Yau manifolds, each indexed by a non-negative inte- ger called genus. The A-model has been mathematically established at all genera by the Gromov-Witten theory, but little is known in mathematics for B-model beyond genus zero. We develop a mathematical theory of higher genus B-model from perturbative quantiza- tion techniques of gauge theory. The relevant gauge theory is the Kodaira-Spencer gauge theory, which is originally discovered by Bershadsky-Cecotti-Ooguri-Vafa as the closed string field theory of B-twisted topological string on Calabi-Yau three-folds. We generalize this to Calabi-Yau manifolds of arbitrary dimensions including also gravitational descen- dants, which we call BCOV theory. We give the geometric description of the perturbative quantization of BCOV theory in terms of deformation-obstruction theory. The vanishing of the relevant obstruction classes will enable us to construct the higher genus B-model. We carry out this construction on the elliptic curve and establish the corresponding higher genus B-model.
    [Show full text]
  • String Cosmology
    ��������� � ������ ������ �� ��������� ��� ������������� ������� �� � �� ���� ���� ������ ��������� ���� � �� ������� ���������� �� �������� ���������� �� ������� ��������� �� ���������� ������ Lecture 2 Stabilization of moduli in superstring theory Fluxes NS (perturbative string theory) RR (non-perturbative string theory) Non-perturbative corrections to superpotential and Kahler potential Start 2008 Higgs?Higgs? MSSM?MSSM? SplitSplit susysusy?? NoNo susysusy?? IFIF SUSYSUSY ISIS THERETHERE…… The significance of discovery of supersymmetry in nature, which will manifests itself via existence of supersymmetric particles, would be a discovery of the fermionicfermionic dimensionsdimensions ofof spacetimespacetime ItIt willwill bebe thethe mostmost fundamentalfundamental discoverydiscovery inin physicsphysics afterafter EinsteinEinstein’’ss relativityrelativity SUPERSYMMETRY: GravityGravity Supergravity/StringSupergravity/String theorytheory There are no single scalars fields in susy models! Scalars come in pairs, they are always complex in supersymmetry. For example, axion and dilaton or axion and radial modulus. Generically, multi-dimensional moduli space. An effective inflaton may be a particular direction in moduli space. In string theory scalars often have geometrical meaning: distance between branes, size of internal dimensions, size of supersymmetric cycles on which branes can be wrapped, etc StabilizationStabilization ofof modulimoduli isis necessarynecessary forfor stringstring theorytheory toto describedescribe thethe effectiveeffective
    [Show full text]
  • Conifold Transitions and Five-Brane Condensation in M-Theory on Spin(7
    INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS PUBLISHING CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY Class. Quantum Grav. 20 (2003) 665–705 PII: S0264-9381(03)53801-1 Conifold transitions and five-brane condensation in M-theory on Spin(7) manifolds Sergei Gukov1,JamesSparks2 and David Tong3 1 Jefferson Physical Laboratory, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 2 Centre for Mathematical Sciences, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK 3 Center for Theoretical Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] and [email protected] Received 23 September 2002, in final form 6 January 2003 Published 28 January 2003 Online at stacks.iop.org/CQG/20/665 Abstract We conjecture a topology-changing transition in M-theory on a non-compact asymptotically conical Spin(7) manifold, where a 5-sphere collapses and a CP2 bolt grows. We argue that the transition may be understood as the condensation of M5-branes wrapping S5.Upon reduction to ten dimensions, it has a physical interpretation as a transition of D6-branes lying on calibrated submanifolds of flat space. In yet another guise, it may be seen as a geometric transition between two phases of type IIA string theory on a G2 holonomy manifold with either wrapped D6-branes, or background Ramond–Ramond flux. This is the first non-trivial example of a topology-changing transition with only 1/16 supersymmetry. PACS numbers: 11.25.Mj, 11.30.Pb, 11.15.Tk Contents 1. Introduction 666 2. D6-branes, M-theory and Spin(7) conifolds 670 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Gauss-Manin Connection in Disguise: Calabi-Yau Threefolds 1
    Gauss-Manin connection in disguise: Calabi-Yau threefolds 1 Murad Alim, Hossein Movasati, Emanuel Scheidegger, Shing-Tung Yau Abstract We describe a Lie Algebra on the moduli space of Calabi-Yau threefolds enhanced with differential forms and its relation to the Bershadsky-Cecotti-Ooguri-Vafa holo- morphic anomaly equation. In particular, we describe algebraic topological string alg partition functions Fg , g ≥ 1, which encode the polynomial structure of holomorphic and non-holomorphic topological string partition functions. Our approach is based on Grothendieck’s algebraic de Rham cohomology and on the algebraic Gauss-Manin connection. In this way, we recover a result of Yamaguchi-Yau and Alim-L¨ange in an algebraic context. Our proofs use the fact that the special polynomial generators defined using the special geometry of deformation spaces of Calabi-Yau threefolds cor- respond to coordinates on such a moduli space. We discuss the mirror quintic as an example. Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Holomorphic anomaly equations 7 2.1 Specialgeometry ................................. 7 2.2 Specialcoordinates.............................. 8 2.3 Holomorphic anomaly equations . ... 9 2.4 Polynomialstructure. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 9 3 Algebraic structure of topological string theory 10 3.1 Specialpolynomialrings . 10 3.2 Different choices of Hodge filtrations . ..... 12 3.3 LieAlgebradescription . 13 3.4 Algebraic master anomaly equation . ..... 14 arXiv:1410.1889v1 [math.AG] 7 Oct 2014 4 Proofs 15 4.1 Generalizedperioddomain . 15 4.2 ProofofTheorem1................................ 16 4.3 ProofofTheorem2................................ 17 4.4 The Lie Algebra G ................................ 18 4.5 Two fundamental equalities of the special geometry . .......... 18 5 Mirror quintic case 19 6 Final remarks 21 1 Math.
    [Show full text]
  • MEMORIA DEL CENTRO DE CIENCIAS DE BENASQUE Barcelona, 31 De Diciembre De 2005
    MEMORIA DEL CENTRO DE CIENCIAS DE BENASQUE Barcelona, 31 de Diciembre de 2005 I – INTRODUCCIÓN En unos pocos años España se ha convertido en uno de los focos mundiales de atracción de actividades veraniegas, principalmente de carácter lúdico y turístico. Hasta este momento se han usado poco las características de nuestro país para convertirlo en un foco de actividades de tipo científico. Hace unas pocas décadas la representación española en el concierto científico internacional era, prácticamente, inexistente. Aún en 1977 sólo el 0.64% de los artículos científicos que aparecían en la base de datos del Science Citation Index (SCI) tenían algún autor español. En el período 1977-1993 los artículos científicos del SCI en los que al menos un autor era español ha aumentado a un ritmo superior al 9% anual y en 1993 un 2.0% de todos los artículos contenidos en el SCI tienen, al menos, un autor español. Se ha avanzado mucho en pocos años, pero este esfuerzo debe continuar. En España era habitual, en 1994, la celebración de conferencias científicas sobre distintas temáticas y con características diversas. Todas estas reuniones, más o menos multitudinarias, se caracterizan por su corta duración (alrededor de una semana) y gran número diario de conferencias, lo cual hace que quede poco tiempo para poder trabajar o discutir con otros científicos. Sin embargo ni en nuestro país ni en el resto de Europa existían, por aquel entonces, verdaderos centros donde, en un ambiente agradable, los científicos se pudieran dedicar a trabajar tranquilamente y a discutir con sus colegas. Un centro de este tipo lleva muchos años funcionando, con gran éxito, en la localidad norteamericana de Aspen, en Colorado.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Non-Abelian Vortex in Four Dimensions and Little String Theory
    FTPI-MINN-17/06, UMN-TH-3622/17 Critical Non-Abelian Vortex in Four Dimensions and Little String Theory M. Shifman a and A. Yung a,b,c aWilliam I. Fine Theoretical Physics Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 bNational Research Center “Kurchatov Institute”, Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Gatchina, St. Petersburg 188300, Russia cSt. Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg 199034, Russia Abstract As was shown recently, non-Abelian vortex strings supported in four- dimensional = 2 supersymmetric QCD with the U(2) gauge group and N Nf = 4 quark multiplets (flavors) become critical superstrings. In addition to the translational moduli non-Abelian strings under consideration carry six orientational and size moduli. Together they form a ten-dimensional target space required for a superstring to be critical. The target space of the string sigma model is a product of the flat four-dimensional space and a Calabi-Yau non-compact threefold, namely, the conifold. We study closed string states which emerge in four dimensions (4D) and identify them with hadrons of arXiv:1704.00825v1 [hep-th] 3 Apr 2017 four-dimensional = 2 QCD. One massless state was found previously: it emerges as a masslessN hypermultiplet associated with the deformation of the complex structure of the conifold. In this paper we find a number of massive states. To this end we exploit the approach used in LST, “Little String Theory,” namely equivalence between the critical string on the conifold and non-critical c = 1 string with the Liouville field and a compact scalar at the self-dual radius. The states we find carry “baryonic” charge (its definition differs from standard).
    [Show full text]