ESTIMATES for the PHM ATLÂNTICO BASED on OPEN SOURCES Luiz Octávio Gavião1 Marcio Magno De Farias Franco E Silva2 Emilia Machado3 Mariana Petine4

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ESTIMATES for the PHM ATLÂNTICO BASED on OPEN SOURCES Luiz Octávio Gavião1 Marcio Magno De Farias Franco E Silva2 Emilia Machado3 Mariana Petine4 DOI 10.21544/1809-3191.v24n3.p735-758 OPERATING AND SUPPORT COSTS FOR NEW VESSELS: ESTIMATES FOR THE PHM ATLÂNTICO BASED ON OPEN SOURCES Luiz Octávio Gavião1 Marcio Magno de Farias Franco e Silva2 Emilia Machado3 Mariana Petine4 ABSTRACT PHM Atlântico was recently acquired by the Brazilian Navy. The size of the ship indicates that its operating and support costs must be the highest among the conventional vessels of the Force. In general, naval assets remain in active service for 25 to 30 years, although the Navy is extending the working time of some of its main vessels. Knowing the life-cycle costs of ships allows the Force to carry out the appropriate budget planning in the medium and long term. However, the new ships acquired, from construction projects or even directly from the market, lack historical cost records. This makes it difficult to estimate life-cycle costs. This paper aims to apply analogy and parametric methods, associated with Bayesian inference models, to estimate the operation and support costs for the PHM Atlântico. Only open source data was used in the research. The results by different methods were similar, offering interesting alternatives for the calculation of life-cycle costs in a situation of data scarcity. Keywords: Life-Cycle Costs. Analogy method. Parametric method. Bayesian Inference. PHM Atlântico. 1 Holds a Bachelor’s degree in Naval Sciences from the Naval School, a Master’s in Military Studies at United States Marine Corps University (2002-2003), a Master’s and PhD in Production Engineering from UFF, and is an Adjunct Professor at the Brazilian War College (ESG), where he conducts research at the Training Center for Defense Acquisition (CCAD). Email: [email protected] 2 Rear Admiral (RM1), Superintendent and Dean of Research and Graduate Program in Maritime Studies at the Naval War College (EGN). Rio de Janeiro - RJ). Email: marcio. [email protected] 3 Graduate student in International Security and Defense, Brazilian War College (ESG). Rio de Janeiro - RJ). Brazil. Email: [email protected] 4 Holds a graduate degree in International Security and Defense at the Brazilian War College (ESG) - (RJ), Brazil. Email: [email protected] R. Esc. Guerra Nav., Rio de Janeiro, v. 24, n. 2, p. 435-462. maio/agosto. 2018. 436 OPERATING AND SUPPORT COSTS FOR NEW VESSELS INTRODUCTION The management of the life cycle of defense systems is a topic of the highest relevance. In general, defense systems are inherently complex because of the high number of elements that compose them, with various interrelationships between these components and with other systems, requiring advanced technology for their use and maintenance. In this context, it is necessary to know, measure and manage the life cycle of these complex systems, which can remain active for over 40 years (BRAZIL, 2017). The life cycle includes the whole spectrum of activities related to a system of interest, from the identification of capabilities and requirements, to system design and development, production and/or construction, operational deployment, maintenance support and disposal of materials. At each stage of the lifecycle, a series of processes and models inherent in system acquisition, contracting, development and operating expenditure need to be addressed under best management practices. These various life cycle phases involve time and resources and should receive the utmost attention from managers and advisors, so that efficient life cycle management contributes to the reliability and availability of defense systems employed in each of the Brazilian Armed Forces (BRAZIL, 2017). Estimating costs of defense systems life cycle phases is essential for efficient management. Government procurement programs require cost estimates for several reasons: supporting decisions about which program to prioritize; annual budget planning; assessing requirements at key decision points during life cycle management; and developing performance benchmarks. In addition, having a realistic estimate of projected costs makes resource allocation effective and increases the likelihood of program success (USGAO, 2009). However, measuring defense system costs is considerably challenging. The conditions for developing a good cost estimate require stable and accurate development programs, access to detailed documentation and historical data, availability of well-trained and experienced cost analysts, execution of risk and uncertainty analysis, identification of adequate confidence levels and long-term contingency and management reserves under the best of these circumstances. These conditions usually do not exist in the real world. Information is not accurate and fully available to users. Supporting documentation is scarce or classified, there are no similar programs for comparison, or estimation methodologies are based on irrelevant or outdated data (USGAO, 2009). In short, the task of estimating costs requires analysts to R. Esc. Guerra Nav., Rio de Janeiro, v. 24, n. 3, p. 735-758. setembro/dezembro. 2018. Luiz Octávio Gavião, Marcio Magno de Farias Franco e Silva, Emilia Machado and Mariana Petine437 use their skills and judgment to produce essentially probabilistic results. In a recent interview with the Valor Econômico newspaper, the Navy Commander (NC) exposed some concerns related to the life-cycle management of navy ships. Since 2013, Navy resources fell 55% to R$ 2.9 billion. This decrease has affected major ongoing programs, causing delays in submarine construction and extending the useful life of surface vessels that should operate for 25 to 30 years. According to the NC, investments in the re-equipment of the Navy should be of around R$ 1.2 billion per year, but the Force only receives, on average, approximately R$ 600 million (ROSA, 2018). The budget constraint scenario in the Navy in recent years makes expenditure forecasting even more important to prevent premature depreciation of assets. In the case of new defense products (PRODE), developed in research and development (R&D) projects or even acquired in the market, this forecasting capacity is limited due to the scarcity of historical cost records. In this case, the Force risks acquiring new equipment with a high life-cycle cost (LCC), further aggravating budget constraints. This long-term economic sustainability problem is called “affordability” in the specialized literature (MELESE, 2015). Managing the life cycle of a defense system requires the use of estimation models, because of the uncertainties involving its useful life. Operative and, eventually, combat activities over decades of active service can result in additional operating and support costs, making budget planning difficult. Modernization programs of equipment, required to keep them up to date with the state of the art of similar systems, may aggravate the difficulty. This uncertainty is expressed in estimation results by ranges of values and associated probabilities. At first glance, an estimate may be depreciated compared with accurate data. However, defense system operation and maintenance data are naturally private and classified by manufacturers and users. Thus, a result, even if estimated, is better than the lack of the information necessary for comparison and decision-making. Another relevant aspect of the scope of this study concerns the use of open sources. Estimated results based on publicly available information are of interest because they allow anticipated planning and comparison with other systems with potential for development or acquisition. In addition, results based on open sources may serve as a reference when assessing classified data obtained during or after negotiation with supplying countries and firms. For example, estimates based on classified data that are considerably lower than open source results may indicate data omission or miscalculations, seriously R. Esc. Guerra Nav., Rio de Janeiro, v. 24, n. 3, p. 735-758. setembro/dezembro. 2018. 438 OPERATING AND SUPPORT COSTS FOR NEW VESSELS impairing long-term budget planning. On the other hand, significantly higher results may warn of high maintenance costs of certain subsystems or components, characterizing the new equipment as atypical. The open sources used in this study are naval architecture data, available in reference publications, official data on HMS Ocean published by the Royal Navy, and information from the specialized media. In this context, the recent acquisition of PHM Atlântico is the focus of this paper. Because it is the largest ship in the Fleet, it is reasonable to assume that it will require the largest share of resources among conventional vessels, restricted here to those without nuclear propulsion. Considering an useful life of 25 to 30 years, a significant resource consumption is expected for its operation and support. The Royal Navy, which designed and launched the then called HMS Ocean in 1998, spent ₤ 150 million in its acquisition, according to British media reports (ROBERTSON, 2018). However, detailed records of annual operating and support costs (O&S) throughout its useful life cycle from 1995 to 2018 are not available from open sources. These costs represent, in general, the largest share of the total ownership costs of a ship and not knowing them may compromise the readiness of the Force (Gansler & Lucyshyn, 2015). Thus, the answer to the following research question may contribute to medium- and long-term navy budget planning: How to estimate PHM Atlântico’s O&S, within a context of data scarcity, and what is
Recommended publications
  • The British Commonwealth and Allied Naval Forces' Operation with the Anti
    THE BRITISH COMMONWEALTH AND ALLIED NAVAL FORCES’ OPERATION WITH THE ANTI-COMMUNIST GUERRILLAS IN THE KOREAN WAR: WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE OPERATION ON THE WEST COAST By INSEUNG KIM A dissertation submitted to The University of Birmingham For the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of History and Cultures College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham May 2018 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This thesis examines the British Commonwealth and Allied Naval forces operation on the west coast during the final two and a half years of the Korean War, particularly focused on their co- operation with the anti-Communist guerrillas. The purpose of this study is to present a more realistic picture of the United Nations (UN) naval forces operation in the west, which has been largely neglected, by analysing their activities in relation to the large number of irregular forces. This thesis shows that, even though it was often difficult and frustrating, working with the irregular groups was both strategically and operationally essential to the conduct of the war, and this naval-guerrilla relationship was of major importance during the latter part of the naval campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Narrative Ours Is the Epic Story of the Royal Navy, Its Impact on Britain and the World from Its Origins in 625 A.D
    NMRN Master Narrative Ours is the epic story of the Royal Navy, its impact on Britain and the world from its origins in 625 A.D. to the present day. We will tell this emotionally-coloured and nuanced story, one of triumph and achievement as well as failure and muddle, through four key themes:- People. We tell the story of the Royal Navy’s people. We examine the qualities that distinguish people serving at sea: courage, loyalty and sacrifice but also incidents of ignorance, cruelty and cowardice. We trace the changes from the amateur ‘soldiers at sea’, through the professionalization of officers and then ships’ companies, onto the ‘citizen sailors’ who fought the World Wars and finally to today’s small, elite force of men and women. We highlight the change as people are rewarded in war with personal profit and prize money but then dispensed with in peace, to the different kind of recognition given to salaried public servants. Increasingly the people’s story becomes one of highly trained specialists, often serving in branches with strong corporate identities: the Royal Marines, the Submarine Service and the Fleet Air Arm. We will examine these identities and the Royal Navy’s unique camaraderie, characterised by simultaneous loyalties to ship, trade, branch, service and comrades. Purpose. We tell the story of the Royal Navy’s roles in the past, and explain its purpose today. Using examples of what the service did and continues to do, we show how for centuries it was the pre-eminent agent of first the British Crown and then of state policy throughout the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Operations in Libya
    Military Operations in Libya Standard Note: SN/IA/5909 Last updated: 24 October 2011 Author: Claire Taylor Section International Affairs and Defence Section On 17 March 2011 the UN Security Council adopted resolution 1973 (2011), under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, which authorised the use of force, including enforcement of a no-fly zone, enforcement of a UN arms embargo against Libya and to protect civilians and civilian areas targeted by the Qaddafi regime and its supporters. The weekend of 19/20 March saw French, British and US military action begin under Operation Odyssey Dawn. By the end of March command of that operation had been gradually transitioned to NATO. On 23 March NATO assumed command of operations to enforce the UN arms embargo. The transfer of command responsibility for the no-fly zone was agreed on 24 March; while the decision to transfer command and control for all military operations in Libya was taken on 27 March. NATO formally assumed command under Operation Unified Protector at 0600 hours on 31 March 2011. Military operations have been ongoing for seven months. During that time there have been criticisms of stalemate in the military campaign, allegations over burden sharing among NATO Member States, and questions over the existence of a viable exit strategy. Following the fall of Sirte and the death of Colonel Gadaffi, Libya’s transitional government declared liberation on 23 October 2011. The NATO Secretary General also confirmed in a statement that a preliminary decision had been taken to end Operation Unified Protector on 31 October 2011. However, he also went on to state that NATO would monitor the situation and retain the capacity to respond to threats to civilians if necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Cadets to the Rescue
    TYNE AND WEAR News from and about members Cadets to the rescue THE COUNTY of Tyne and Wear takes Legion to lay a wreath at Whitley Bay to its name from two magnificent rivers commemorate the 75th Anniversary of the and therefore ports, docks, rivers and the Battle of Britain, again I was grateful to sea dominate the landscape and played a the Sea Cadets for their hearty singing (the prominent part in my first six months as Salvation Army having failed to turn up High Sheriff of Tyne and Wear. and leaving me somewhat exposed as lead Just a few days after my Declaration, soprano). Britain’s largest warship and helicopter On the Gateshead side of the river carrier HMS Ocean sailed into the port of Tyne, the new Lord-Lieutenant of Tyne Top: Hard at work Sunderland to be awarded the Freedom of and Wear, Mrs Sue Winfield (High Sheriff Above: High Sheriff (second from left): 'What on the City by Sunderland City Council. I was in 2010/11) commissioned a new pontoon earth are we supposed to do?' fascinated by the capability demonstration; for the Marine Cadets; I commissioned learnt a great deal about the role of the two new sailing boats, and the Gateshead’s by the sense of community in our county Royal Navy in keeping our nation safe; Mayor was allocated a rowing boat. Again and the fabulous work undertaken by so marched to the Royal Marines Band; the young cadets were impressive and I many volunteers who are supporting our enjoyed the Salute at dusk (but I wished accepted their invitation to return to their children and young people, many of whom I worn some thermals!); dined with the open day and took part in rowing, sailing face the most challenging circumstances in Captain and thoroughly enjoyed learning and other water sports.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Maritime Power
    Joint Doctrine Publication 0-10 UK Maritime Power Fifth Edition Development, Concepts and Doctrine Centre Joint Doctrine Publication 0-10 UK Maritime Power Joint Doctrine Publication 0-10 (JDP 0-10) (5th Edition), dated October 2017, is promulgated as directed by the Chiefs of Staff Director Concepts and Doctrine Conditions of release 1. This information is Crown copyright. The Ministry of Defence (MOD) exclusively owns the intellectual property rights for this publication. You are not to forward, reprint, copy, distribute, reproduce, store in a retrieval system, or transmit its information outside the MOD without VCDS’ permission. 2. This information may be subject to privately owned rights. i Authorisation The Development, Concepts and Doctrine Centre (DCDC) is responsible for publishing strategic trends, joint concepts and doctrine. If you wish to quote our publications as reference material in other work, you should confirm with our editors whether the particular publication and amendment state remains authoritative. We welcome your comments on factual accuracy or amendment proposals. Please send them to: The Development, Concepts and Doctrine Centre Ministry of Defence Shrivenham SWINDON Wiltshire SN6 8RF Telephone: 01793 31 4216/4217/4220 Military network: 96161 4216/4217/4220 E-mail: [email protected] All images, or otherwise stated are: © Crown copyright/MOD 2017. Distribution Distributing Joint Doctrine Publication (JDP) 0-10 (5th Edition) is managed by the Forms and Publications Section, LCSLS Headquarters and Operations Centre, C16 Site, Ploughley Road, Arncott, Bicester, OX25 1LP. All of our other publications, including a regularly updated DCDC Publications Disk, can also be demanded from the LCSLS Operations Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunset for the Royal Marines? the Royal Marines and UK Amphibious Capability
    House of Commons Defence Committee Sunset for the Royal Marines? The Royal Marines and UK amphibious capability Third Report of Session 2017–19 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 30 January 2018 HC 622 Published on 4 February 2018 by authority of the House of Commons The Defence Committee The Defence Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Ministry of Defence and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon Dr Julian Lewis MP (Conservative, New Forest East) (Chair) Leo Docherty MP (Conservative, Aldershot) Martin Docherty-Hughes MP (Scottish National Party, West Dunbartonshire) Rt Hon Mark Francois MP (Conservative, Rayleigh and Wickford) Graham P Jones MP (Labour, Hyndburn) Johnny Mercer MP (Conservative, Plymouth, Moor View) Mrs Madeleine Moon MP (Labour, Bridgend) Gavin Robinson MP (Democratic Unionist Party, Belfast East) Ruth Smeeth MP (Labour, Stoke-on-Trent North) Rt Hon John Spellar MP (Labour, Warley) Phil Wilson MP (Labour, Sedgefield) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website at www.parliament.uk/defcom and in print by Order of the House. Evidence relating to this report is published on the inquiry page of the Committee’s website. Committee staff Mark Etherton (Clerk), Dr Adam Evans (Second Clerk), Martin Chong, David Nicholas, Eleanor Scarnell, and Ian Thomson (Committee Specialists), Sarah Williams (Senior Committee Assistant), and Carolyn Bowes and Arvind Gunnoo (Committee Assistants).
    [Show full text]
  • 170910 A037 El HMS Ocean Visitará Gibraltar.Pdf
    InfoGibraltar Servicio de Información de Gibraltar Aviso Ministerio de Defensa El HMS Ocean visitará Gibraltar Gibraltar, 10 de septiembre de 2017 [El buque de guerra británico] HMS Ocean llegará a la Base Naval de Su Majestad en Gibraltar (HMNB Gibraltar) el lunes 11 de septiembre para aprovisionarse antes de poner rumbo a su próxima misión en el Caribe, donde ofrecerá asistencia humanitaria y un apoyo vital a los Territorios Británicos de Ultramar y aliados de la Commonwealth afectados por el Huracán Irma. El HMS Ocean, nave portahelicópteros de asalto anfibio y buque insignia de la Royal Navy, se unirá al RFA Mounts Bay para proporcionar asistencia logística y médica en las islas del Caribe devastadas por el Huracán Irma y en la trayectoria del Huracán José. Nota a redactores: Esta es una traducción realizada por la Oficina de Información de Gibraltar. Algunas palabras no se encuentran en el documento original y se han añadido para mejorar el sentido de la traducción. El texto válido es el original en inglés. Para cualquier ampliación de esta información, rogamos contacte con Oficina de Información de Gibraltar Miguel Vermehren, Madrid, [email protected], Tel 609 004 166 Sandra Balvín, Campo de Gibraltar, [email protected], Tel 637 617 757 Eva Reyes Borrego, Campo de Gibraltar, [email protected], Tel 619 778 498 Web: www.infogibraltar.com, web en inglés: www.gibraltar.gov.gi/press-office Twitter: @InfoGibraltar 10/09/2017 1/2 MEDIA RELEASE Reference: CP/06/09 9 September 2017 HMS OCEAN TO VISIT GIBRALTAR HMS OCEAN will arrive in HMNB Gibraltar on Monday 11 September for a stores uplift before deploying to the Caribbean.
    [Show full text]
  • Operations in Libya
    House of Commons Defence Committee OPERATIONS IN LIBYA Written Evidence This is a volume of submissions, relevant to the inquiry into Operations in Libya, which have been reported to the House but not yet approved for publication in final form. Any public use of, or reference to, the contents should make clear that it is not yet an approved final record of the written evidence received by the Committee. List of written evidence 1 Ministry of Defence 2 Commodore Steven Jermy RN 3 Professor M J Williams 4 CJA Cope, Political Editor, Warship World Magazine 5 Keep Our Future Afloat Campaign (KOFAC) 6 Mike Young, Decision Workshops Ltd 7 Raytheon UK 8 Patrick M Lavender 9 Admiral Sir John Woodward and colleagues OL001 Written evidence from the Ministry of Defence On 24 February the Royal Navy and Royal Air Force started evacuating British Entitled Persons from Libya, following widespread protests and fighting across the country. Over the next two weeks almost 1000 persons were evacuated from locations across the country. Shortly after the evacuation was complete, the security situation deteriorated significantly. On the evening of 19 March UK Armed Forces, along with their US and French counterparts, launched military operations in Libya with the aim of protecting the civilian population of Benghazi from an imminent attack by Colonel Gaddafi’s forces. By 31 March NATO had assumed effective command of all operations to enforce UN Security Council Resolutions (UNSCRs) 1970 and 1973 as Operation Unified Protector (OUP). Committing military forces to Libya averted an imminent humanitarian catastrophe in Benghazi and has saved countless lives since.
    [Show full text]
  • Selwood Helps Royal Navy with Decommissioning of HMS Ocean
    SELWOOD RENTAL CASE STUDY Working together with Selwood helps Royal Navy with decommissioning of HMS Ocean The Background The Solution a reliable and robust pumping solution. We were pleased to be able to deliver a solution to meet When Speedy was first approached by Babcock As with all Selwood projects, pump specialists the exact requirements of Babcock International, International to provide a solution to their carried out a detailed and bespoke site survey in including full installation and de-installation, and client’s specialist pumping requirement on order to select the most appropriate units for the were delighted with the positive feedback. We board the former HMS Ocean, they immediately application. The Selwood H150 was selected: with wish HMS Ocean every success for the future as turned to their strategic partner and specialist outstanding performance capabilities for high she enters the next chapter of her journey.” pump supplier Selwood. The project required head and high volume jetting, the H150 has a Selwood’s industry-leading pumps to provide proven track record in a number of industrial and a robust and round-the-clock solution during a civil engineering applications. The Recommendation de-commissioning project on a former Royal Navy It features: Stuart Langham, Contract Director for Babcock vessel. International at Speedy Hire, commented: S Total head of 114m and capacity of 450m3. Through its strategic supply partnership with “This is a great example of collaborative S Capable of handling a solids size of 30mm Speedy Hire, Selwood has been working with working and demonstrates our multi service S Pump speed of 1800rpm.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunset for the Royal Marines? the Royal Marines and UK Amphibious Capability: Government Response to the Committee’S Third Report
    House of Commons Defence Committee Sunset for the Royal Marines? The Royal Marines and UK amphibious capability: Government Response to the Committee’s Third Report Sixth Special Report of Session 2017–19 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 15 May 2018 HC 1044 Published on 16 May 2018 by authority of the House of Commons The Defence Committee The Defence Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Ministry of Defence and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon Dr Julian Lewis MP (Conservative, New Forest East) (Chair) Leo Docherty MP (Conservative, Aldershot) Martin Docherty-Hughes MP (Scottish National Party, West Dunbartonshire) Rt Hon Mr Mark Francois MP (Conservative, Rayleigh and Wickford) Graham P Jones MP (Labour, Hyndburn) Johnny Mercer MP (Conservative, Plymouth, Moor View) Mrs Madeleine Moon MP (Labour, Bridgend) Gavin Robinson MP (Democratic Unionist Party, Belfast East) Ruth Smeeth MP (Labour, Stoke-on-Trent North) Rt Hon John Spellar MP (Labour, Warley) Phil Wilson MP (Labour, Sedgefield) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website at www.parliament.uk/defcom and in print by Order of the House. Evidence relating to this report is published on the inquiry page of the Committee’s website. Committee staff Mark Etherton (Clerk), Dr Adam Evans (Second Clerk), Martin Chong, David Nicholas, Eleanor Scarnell, and Ian Thomson (Committee Specialists), Sarah Williams (Senior Committee Assistant) and Arvind Gunnoo (Committee Assistants).
    [Show full text]
  • British Uses of Aircraft Carriers and Amphibious Ships: 1945 – 2010
    Corbett Paper No 9 British uses of Aircraft Carriers and Amphibious Ships: 1945 – 2010 Tim Benbow The Corbett Centre for Maritime Policy Studies March 2012 British uses of Aircraft Carriers and Amphibious Ships: 1945 – 2010 Tim Benbow Key Points . Recent British debates about defence policy and military capabilities have revealed a lack of understanding of the roles of aircraft carriers and amphibious forces. This paper provides a historical survey aiming to offer some empirical evidence to help correct this weakness. Aircraft carriers and amphibious forces have a repeatedly proven ability to conduct the more common smaller-scale operations alone or to act as the foundation enablers of rarer, larger-scale operations; they are particularly well suited to long- term engagement, crisis prevention, deterrence and early action that can make larger scale intervention unnecessary; and air bases and overflight rights have again and again proved unavailable or inadequate despite policy assumptions to the contrary. This survey shows the options and flexibility that carriers and amphibious ships have provided for policy makers over many years in just the sort of activities and operations that are likely to be required of the British armed forces in the future. Carriers and amphibious forces are not a strategic panacea and have limitations in their ability to dominate ground and in the scale of effort that they can take on without the backing of land-based forces. Nevertheless, they offer unique advantages and are essential for a viable British strategy. Dr Tim Benbow is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Defence Studies, King’s College London, at the JSCSC.
    [Show full text]
  • Nmrn Fleet Air Arm Museum Service Narrative
    NMRN FLEET AIR ARM MUSEUM SERVICE NARRATIVE REVIEWED BY THE COLLECTIONS RESEARCH AND LEARNING COMMITTEE OF THE TRUSTEES / 29 NOVEMBER 2017 NMRN FAAM SERVICE NARRATIVE Fleet Air Arm Museum ~ Service Narrative THE FLEET AIR ARM MUSEUM tells the story of NARRATIVE demands of the 21st century, maintaining its ability to project air power from the sea in defence of the UK’s national British naval aviation from its earliest incarnations In 1909, the Royal Navy (RN) ordered its first airship, the interests and also, when called upon, in support of our allies. to the present day – its triumphs and failures, its Mayfly. Two years later, four officers of the RN, one a Royal Marine, became the first Navy pilots using aircraft borrowed ingenuity and innovation, its impact and from a civilian, Frank McClean. They and those who quickly Purpose 1 The Royal Navy’s new, state-of-the-art aircraft carrier, HMS Queen Elizabeth, 2017. importance. followed them were the pioneers tasked with developing the We tell the story of the origins of naval aviation, its cutting-edge and embryonic concept of operating aircraft at 2 Mechanics, Riggers, Pilot and Observer, around 1916. sea. From that time on, British naval aviation has continued development over time and its purpose today. We trace its to demonstrate and enhance those qualities and capabilities evolution from the Royal Naval Air Service (RNAS) and its 3 Landing Royal Marines in Sierra Leone, Operation that make it unique – the innovation, self-reliance and original ‘Eyes in the Sky’ role to the multi-role operations of Silkman, 2000.
    [Show full text]