DOCSLIB.ORG

226 Chatham Island Oystercatcher

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Text and images extracted from Marchant, S. & Higgins, P.J. (editors) 1993. Handbook of Australian , New Zealand &Antarctic Birds. Volume 2, Raptors to lapwings. Melbourne, Oxford University Press. Pages 648-649, 715, 734-739; plate 56. Reproduced with the permission of Bird life Australia and Jeff Davies. 648 C haradri ifo rmes Order CHARADRIIFORMES A large, diverse asse mblage of small to medium-large (1 2-75 em long) limicoline, pratincoline, aquatic or terrestrial birds. Cosmopolitan fro m Arctic to Antarctic regions; in all sorts of maritime, freshwater and open terrestrial habitats (including deserts ) with a few (woodcocks and snipes) even using dense forests. Once known as Limicolae or Laro-limicolae (e.g. Mayr & Amadon 195 1) ; colloquially, the assemblage (excluding alcids, sku as, gulls, tems and skimmers) is often referred to as waders (especially in Britain) or shorebirds (especially in North America). About 350 species in 19 fa milies, though taxonomic treatments vary. Following families recognized (mostly based on recent reviews of O rder [Sibley et al. 1988; Sibley & A hlquist 1990; Sibley & M onroe 1990]): Thinocoridae seedsnipes; fo ur species, S. America. Pedionomidae Plains-wanderer; monotypic, Aust. Scolopacidae sandpipers, snipes and allies; c. 85 species, cosmopolitan. Rostratulidae pa inted snipes; two species, s. America and O ld World. Jacanidae jacanas; seven species, pantropical. Chionididae sheathbills; two species, Antarctica and subantarctic islands. Burhinidae thick-knees, stone-curlews; nine species, widespread in Old World and two in Neotropics . Haematopod idae oystercatchers; c. 11 species, worldwide in tropics and temperate regions. Recurvirostridae avocets and stilts; about seven species, worldwide in tropical and temperate regions. Ibidiorhynchidae Ibisbill; monotypic, central Asia. Charadriidae plovers and lapwings; c. 60 species, cosmopolitan. Pluvianellidae Mage llanic Plover; monotypic, S. A merica. Dromad idae C rab Plover; monotypic, Arabian region. G lareolidae pratincoles, coursers, and Egyptian Plover; c. 15 species, widespread in Old W orld. Stercorariidae skuas and jaegers; about seven species, mostly in Arctic and Antarctic regions. Rhynchopidae skimmers; three species, pantropical. Laridae gulls; c. 47 species, cosmopolitan. Sternidae tems; c. 42 species, cosmopolitan. A lcidae auks; c. 20 species, Arctic and temperate regions of n. hemisphere. Apparently monophyletic. Pteroclididae (sa ndgrouse ) probably sister-group of Charadriiformes (e.g. Fjeldsa 1976, 1977; Sibley & Ahlquist 1990; BWP) , though whether best placed within Charadriiformes or in separate order is debated. Flamingoes (Phoenicopterid ae ) and di vers (Gaviidae ) have also been treated as Charadriiformes (Olson & Feduccia 198 1; Fjeldsa 1976, 1977 ) b ut DNA-DNA hybridization studies (Sibley & A hlquist 1990) inconsistent with these theories. Affinities to other orders still controversial; DNA-DNA h ybridization h as suggested closest links are to large waterbirds, such as storks, herons and allies, Pelicaniformes, Procellariformes, penguins, grebes, divers ( Gaviidae) and also Falconiformes. All these were combined in huge order C iconiiformes by Sibley & Ahlquist ( 1990). Taxonomy and relationships reviewed in Sibley & Ahlquist (1990), Christian etal. (1 992) and BWP (and references therein). Recent rev iews have included: patterning of downy young (J ehl1968; Fj eldsa 1976, 1977), osteology (Strauch 1978; Mickevitch & Parenti 1980; Olson &Steadman 1981 ), DNA- DNA hybridization (Sibleyetal.1988, Sibley &Ahlquist 1990) and electrophoresis of tissue proteins (Christian etal. 1992 ). The studies of allozymes, DNA-DN A hybridiza ti on and the most recent osteological study of the e ntire o rder (Strauch 1978) h ave agreed in finding two or three we ll-knit, monophyletic asse mblages within the Charadriifonnes: scolopacids and allies (Thinocoridae , Pedionomidae, Scolopacidae, Rostratulidae, Jacanidae ) and c haradrids and allies (Chionididae, Burhinidae, Haematopodidae, Recurvirostridae, Ibidorhyncidae, Charadriidae, Pluvianellidae, Dromadidae, Glareolidae, Stercorcariidae, Rhynchopidae, Laridae, Sternidae, A lcidae ); Strauch ( 1978) treated Alcidae as separate lineage, but skeletons may be so highly modified for foot-propelled diving that they do not reflect relations well (Sibley & Ahlquist 1990); gulls and allies have also been regarded as a separate lineage (Christian etal. 1992 ) or as allied to charadrids (e.g. Sibley & Ahlquist 1990). Further relationships within the O rder discussed in introductions to fa milies. Because the O rd er comprises so many species and adaptations are so diverse, few characters shared by all species; those that are shared are mostly anatomical fea tures of the skull, e.g. most or all have schizorhinal nostrils, schizognathous palates, well-developed vomer, lachrymals fused with ectethemoid and pre-frontal bones, well-developed supra-orbital grooves; see O lson & S teadman (1 981) fo r more information on osteological characters. Wings usually have 11 primaries, with p1 0 longest and p 11 minute; 15-24 secondaries; diastataxic except in Scolopax minor, as far as is known. Usually 12 tail-feathers. Necks usually rather long with 15- 16 cervical vertebrae. O il-gland bilobed and tufted. Syrinx, tracheo-bronchial; two carotids (type A- 1 of G lenny 1955 ); caeca present. Legs usually rather long; hind toe small or lacking in most but all toes greatly elongated in Jacanidae. Feathers w ith small thin afterfeathers. Normally two moults annually: complete post- Pedionomus torquatus 649 breeding and partial pre-breeding; some jacanas and alcids have fl ightless periods when moulting re miges. Young, downy, usually with intricate cryptic patterns on upperparts of three chief types: pebbly, spotted and striped , ma tching characters of habitat (Fjeldsa 1976, 1977): precocial, nidifugo us usually, self-feeding or not depending greatly on parents. Thirteen families recorded in HANZA B region, with 54 species breeding, 41 occurring as regular n on-breeding migrants and c. 38 as accidentals or probable accidentals. Scolopac idae, Stercorcariidae, Laridae and Stemidae will be dealt with in Volume 3 of HANZAB. REFEREN CES Chri sti an, P. O., et al. 1992. Aust. ). Zool. 40: 29 1- 302. O lson, S.L., & A. Feduccia. 1981. Smirhson. Contrib. Zool. 323: 1- 24. Fje ldsa, J. 1976. Videns/c Mecld. dansk. Natur. Foren. 139: 179-243. -, & O.W. Steadman. 198 1. Smithson. Contrib. Zool. 337: 1- 25. - 1977. Guide to rh e Young of European Precocial Birds. Scarv Nature Sibley, CG., & J .E. A hlquist. 1990. Ph ylogeny and Classification of Birds Productions, Tisv ildeleje. of the World. Ya le Univ. Press, New Haven. Glenny, F.H . 1955. Proc. US natn. Mus. 103 (3346): 525-62 1. -, & B.L. Monroe. 1990. Diso-ibution and Taxonom)' of the Birds of the Jchl, j.L., Jr. 1968. Mem. San Diego Soc. nat. Hist. 3. World. Ya le Univ. Press; New Haven. Mayr, E., & D. A madon . 195 1. Am . Mus. Novit. 1496. - ,etal. 1988 . Auk 105:409- 423. Mickevich, M. F., & L.R. Parent i. 1980. Syst. Zool. 29: 108-113. Strauch, J.G ., Jr. 1978 . Trans. zool. Soc. Lond. 34: 263-345. 71 5 Family HAEMATOPODIDAE oystercatchers Rather large ( 40-49 em long) black or pied waders, heavily built, with sturdy legs, and long straight robust bills. About 21 species and subspecies, all in single genus Haematopus; almost worldwide on temperate and tropical coastlines. Species limits uncertain (Baker 1975, 1977); rather uniform structure and simple patterns of plumages not reflecting well any generic differentiation of allopatric species and subspecies; as few as three species and as many as twelve have been recognized. The relationships and arrangement of species or subspecies continues to be debated; we treat as fi ve species in our region, two endemic to Aust. and three to NZ and C hatham Is. Probably most closely related to Recurvirostridae (q.v.) ; intermediate anatomically and behaviourally between Scolopacidae and Laridae . Solidly built. Sexes similar; females slightly larger than m ales. N ecks stout; 15 cervical vertebrae. Wings, long and pointed; 11 primaries (pll minute), 18-20 secondaries and moderately large carpal knob. Tails, short and square; 12 rectrices. Bills, long and straight, laterally compressed; adapted for opening shells and chiselling molluscs off rocks, with muscles of jaw and neck strongly developed (Burton 1974 ). Bills range from blunt and square-tipped to pointed; length and shape of bill-tip varying in individuals according to choice of prey and feeding substrate (Hulscher & Ens 199 1 ). Nostrils, pervious; schizorhinal. Legs, stout and rather long; tarsi, reticulated with small hexagonal scales. Toes, stout, only transversely scutellated on distal half; slightly webbed at base, no hallux. Caeca present. No crop. Large supraorbital glands. Plumages, black or blackish brown, some species with white underparts, rump and wing-bars. Bills, legs and feet, orange or pink to red; irides, scarlet or ye llow; orbital rings, reddish (yellow in H. leucojJodus) . Two moults per cycle. Post-breeding moult, complete, primaries outwards; pre-breeding moult, partial but only in Euras ian O ystercatcher H . ostralegus do breeding and non-breeding plumages differ markedly. Young hatch in soft woolly down; most species, brownish grey, with white belly and vent, all with dark lines and spots above forming simple pebbled pattern, similar to that of Burhinidae. Juveniles, duller scalloped versions of adult with darker bare parts;
Recommended publications
  • Black Oystercatcher

    Black Oystercatcher

    Alaska Species Ranking System - Black Oystercatcher Black Oystercatcher Class: Aves Order: Charadriiformes Haematopus bachmani Review Status: Peer-reviewed Version Date: 08 April 2019 Conservation Status NatureServe: Agency: G Rank:G5 ADF&G: Species of Greatest Conservation Need IUCN: Audubon AK: S Rank: S2S3B,S2 USFWS: Bird of Conservation Concern BLM: Final Rank Conservation category: V. Orange unknown status and either high biological vulnerability or high action need Category Range Score Status -20 to 20 0 Biological -50 to 50 11 Action -40 to 40 -4 Higher numerical scores denote greater concern Status - variables measure the trend in a taxon’s population status or distribution. Higher status scores denote taxa with known declining trends. Status scores range from -20 (increasing) to 20 (decreasing). Score Population Trend in Alaska (-10 to 10) 0 Suspected stable (ASG 2019; Cushing et al. 2018), but data are limited and do not encompass this species' entire range. We therefore rank this question as Unknown. Distribution Trend in Alaska (-10 to 10) 0 Unknown. Habitat is dynamic and subject to change as a result of geomorphic and glacial processes. For example, numbers expanded on Middleton Island after the 1964 earthquake (Gill et al. 2004). Status Total: 0 Biological - variables measure aspects of a taxon’s distribution, abundance and life history. Higher biological scores suggest greater vulnerability to extirpation. Biological scores range from -50 (least vulnerable) to 50 (most vulnerable). Score Population Size in Alaska (-10 to 10) -2 Uncertain. The global population is estimated at 11,000 individuals, of which 45%-70% breed in Alaska (ASG 2019).
  • Phylogenetic Reanalysis of Strauch's Osteological Data Set for The

    Phylogenetic Reanalysis of Strauch's Osteological Data Set for The

    TheCondor97:174-196 0 The Cooper Ornithological Society 1995 PHYLOGENETIC REANALYSIS OF STRAUCH’S OSTEOLOGICAL DATA SET FOR THE CHARADRIIFORMES PHILIP c. CHU Department of Biology and Museum of Zoology The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Abstract. Strauch’s (1978) compatibility analysisof relationshipsamong the shorebirds (Charadriifonnes) was the first study to examine the full range of charadriifonn taxa in a reproducibleway. SubsequentlyMickevich and Parenti (1980) leveled seriouscharges against Strauch’s characters,method of phylogenetic inference, and results. To account for these charges,Strauch ’s characterswere re-examined and recoded, and parsimony analyseswere performed on the revised matrix. A parsimony analysison 74 taxa from the revised matrix yielded 855 shortesttrees, each length = 286 and consistencyindex = 0.385. In each shortest tree there were two major lineages,a lineageof sandpiper-likebirds and a lineageof plover- like birds; the two formed a monophyletic group, with the auks (Alcidae) being that group’s sister taxon. The shortest trees were then compared with other estimates of shorebird re- lationships, comparison suggestingthat the chargesagainst Strauch’s results may have re- sulted from the Mickevich and Parenti decisions to exclude much of Strauch’s character evidence. Key words: Charadrilformes; phylogeny; compatibility analysis: parsimony analysis; tax- onomic congruence. INTRODUCTION Strauch scored 227 charadriiform taxa for 70 The investigation of evolutionary relationships characters. Sixty-three of the characters were among shorebirds (Aves: Charadriiformes) has a taken from either the skull or postcranial skel- long history (reviewed in Sibley and Ahlquist eton; the remaining seven involved the respec- 1990). Almost all studies used morphology to tive origins of three neck muscles, as published make inferences about shared ancestry; infer- in Burton (1971, 1972, 1974) and Zusi (1962).
  • CHAPTER 1 General Introduction 1.1 Shorebirds in Australia Shorebirds

    CHAPTER 1 General Introduction 1.1 Shorebirds in Australia Shorebirds

    CHAPTER 1 General introduction 1.1 Shorebirds in Australia Shorebirds, sometimes referred to as waders, are birds that rely on coastal beaches, shorelines, estuaries and mudflats, or inland lakes, lagoons and the like for part of, and in some cases all of, their daily and annual requirements, i.e. food and shelter, breeding habitat. They are of the suborder Charadrii and include the curlews, snipe, plovers, sandpipers, stilts, oystercatchers and a number of other species, making up a diverse group of birds. Within Australia, shorebirds account for 10% of all bird species (Lane 1987) and in New South Wales (NSW), this figure increases marginally to 11% (Smith 1991). Of these shorebirds, 45% rely exclusively on coastal habitat (Smith 1991). The majority, however, are either migratory or vagrant species, leaving only five resident species that will permanently inhabit coastal shorelines/beaches within Australia. Australian resident shorebirds include the Beach Stone-curlew (Esacus neglectus), Hooded Plover (Charadrius rubricollis), Red- capped Plover (Charadrius ruficapillus), Australian Pied Oystercatcher (Haematopus longirostris) and Sooty Oystercatcher (Haematopus fuliginosus) (Smith 1991, Priest et al. 2002). These species are generally classified as ‘beach-nesting’, nesting on sandy ocean beaches, sand spits and sand islands within estuaries. However, the Sooty Oystercatcher is an island-nesting species, using rocky shores of near- and offshore islands rather than sandy beaches. The plovers may also nest by inland salt lakes. Shorebirds around the globe have become increasingly threatened with the pressure of predation, competition, human encroachment and disturbance and global warming. Populations of birds breeding in coastal areas which also support a burgeoning human population are under the highest threat.
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii

    Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii

    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
  • Trophic Facilitation by the Oystercatcher Haematopus Palliatus Temminick on the Scavenger Snail Buccinanops Globulosum Kiener in a Patagonian Bay

    Trophic Facilitation by the Oystercatcher Haematopus Palliatus Temminick on the Scavenger Snail Buccinanops Globulosum Kiener in a Patagonian Bay

    Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 325 (2005) 27–34 www.elsevier.com/locate/jembe Trophic facilitation by the oystercatcher Haematopus palliatus Temminick on the scavenger snail Buccinanops globulosum Kiener in a Patagonian bay Pedro Daleoa,b,*, Mauricio Escapab,c, Juan Pablo Isaccha,b, Pablo Ribeiroa,b, Oscar Iribarnea,b aDepartamento de Biologı´a (FCEyN), Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Funes 3250, CC 573 Correo Central, B7600WAG, Mar del Plata, Argentina bConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientı´ficas y Te´cnicas (CONICET), Argentina cInstituto Argentino de Oceanografı´a (IADO), Argentina Received 25 August 2004; received in revised form 4 April 2005; accepted 7 April 2005 Abstract This study investigated the role of the American oystercatcher (Haematopus palliatus) as a resource subsidizer for the scavenger snail Buccinanops globulosum in a northern Patagonian bay (40845VS, 64856VW, San Antonio Bay, Argentina). The most frequent food item for the snails was dead crabs Cyrtograpsus angulatus Dana, and the snails preferred this item. In the field, most dead crabs (78%) resulted from oystercatcher predation. Field densities of dead crabs were within the 95% confidence limits of the estimated densities produced by oystercatcher foraging activity, suggesting that a large proportion of carrion available for snails is a byproduct of oystercatcher predation. Dead crabs with injuries were more rapidly detected and consumed by snails, probably because injuries produced by oystercatchers increase leakage of body fluids and facilitate penetration of the proboscis of the snails. Our results suggest that oystercatcher predation subsidize this scavenger snail by increasing availability of food, decreasing variability in their provision and facilitating their consumption.
  • Black Oystercatcher Foraging ­ Hollenberg and Demers 35

    Black Oystercatcher Foraging ­ Hollenberg and Demers 35

    Black Oystercatcher foraging ­ Hollenberg and Demers 35 Black Oystercatcher (Haematopus bachmani) foraging on varnish clams (Nuttallia obscurata) in Nanaimo, British Columbia Emily J. R. Hollenberg 1 and Eric Demers 2 1 406­3905 Quadra St., Victoria, B.C., V8X 1J1; email: [email protected] 2 Corresponding author: Biology Department, Vancouver Island University, 900 Fifth St., Nanaimo, B.C., V9R 5S5; email: [email protected] Abstract: In this study, we investigated whether Black Oystercatchers (Haematopus bachmani) feed on the recently intro­ duced varnish clam (Nuttallia obscurata), and whether they selectively feed on specific size classes of varnish clams. Sur­ veys were conducted at Piper’s Lagoon and Departure Bay in Nanaimo, British Columbia, between October 2013 and February 2014. Foraging oystercatchers were observed, and the number and size of varnish clams consumed were recor­ ded. We also determined the density and size of varnish clams available at both sites using quadrats. Our results indicate that Black Oystercatchers consumed varnish clams at both sites, although feeding rates differed slightly between sites. We also found that oystercatchers consumed almost the full range of available clam sizes, with little evidence for size­selective foraging. We conclude that Black Oystercatchers can successfully exploit varnish clams and may obtain a significant part of their daily energy requirements from this non­native species. Key Words: Black Oystercatcher, Haematopus bachmani, varnish clam, Nuttallia obscurata, foraging, Nanaimo. Hollenberg, E.J.R. and E. Demers. 2017. Black Oystercatcher (Haematopus bachmani) foraging on varnish clams (Nuttallia obscurata) in Nanaimo, British Columbia. British Columbia Birds 27:35–41. Campbell et al.
  • AFRICAN Black OYSTERCATCHER

    AFRICAN Black OYSTERCATCHER

    1 1 2 2 3 3 4 African Black Oystercatcher 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 Between 8 9 9 10 10 11 the tides 11 12 Text by Phil Hockey 12 13 13 14 he African Black Oystercatcher’s 14 15 15 first entry into the scientific ‘led- 16 16 17 ger’ happened only 141 years 17 18 T 18 19 ago, when a specimen collected at the 19 20 Cape of Good Hope was described by 20 21 21 22 Bonaparte. Bonaparte named the bird 22 23 moquini after the French botanist, 23 24 24 25 Horace Benedict Alfred Moquin Tandon, 25 26 director of the Toulouse Botanical 26 27 27 28 Gardens. Its first entry into the litera- 28 29 29 ture, however, predates this by more 30 30 31 than 200 years. 31 32 32 33 In 1648, Étienne de Flacourt, the 33 34 Governor-General of Madagascar, 34 35 35 36 visited Saldanha Bay. He wrote: ‘There 36 37 are birds like blackbirds, with a very shrill 37 38 38 39 and clear cry, as large as partridges, with 39 40 40 a long sharp beak and red legs: they are 41 41 42 very good to eat and when young they 42 43 43 44 taste like Woodcock’. The first descrip- 44 45 tions of the bird’s biology date from the 45 46 46 47 late 19th century – much of what was 47 48 written then was culled from knowledge 48 49 49 50 of the European Oystercatcher, and much 50 51 51 of it was wrong! 52 52 53 Now, at the end of the 20th century, it 53 54 54 55 seems as though this striking bird may 55 56 be moving from a confused past into an 56 57 57 58 uncertain future.
  • The Institute for Bird Populations 2012

    The Institute for Bird Populations 2012

    BIRD POPULATIONS A journal of global avian biogeography Volume 11 2012 (2011-2012) Bird Populations 11:1-6 © The Institute for Bird Populations 2012 A SURVEY OF AVIFAUNAL DIVERSITY IN WETLANDS AROUND KEOLADEO NATIONAL PARK, BHARATPUR, RAJASTHAN, INDIA1 BHUMESH SINGH BHADOURIA2, VINOD B. MATHUR, AND K. SIVAKUMAR Wildlife Institute of India Chandrabani, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India K. R. ANOOP Keoladeo National Park Bharatpur, Rajasthan, India Abstract. Keoladeo National Park, a world heritage site, is famous for its rich avifaunal diversity but is now facing water shortages. Therefore, many species of migratory birds have been moving to nearby wetlands for foraging. In this connection, a survey was carried out during 2009-10 to understand the status of birds and their use of these wetlands. A total of 27 wetlands have been identified within 100 km radius of the Keoladeo National Park, and within them 75 species of water birds were recorded. Of the 27 wetlands, Rediabundh is the most species rich with 44 bird species, while only one species was found in Chicksana wetland. Larger-sized wetlands with more water attracted larger numbers of species, including more individual birds, than the smaller wetlands. A landscape level conservation plan, including these wetlands, is needed for the long term conservation of birds in Keoladeo National Park. Key words: India, Keoladeo National Park, Rediabundh, Wetland bird populations. DIVERSIDAD AVIFAUNISTICA EN LOS HUMEDALES ALEDAÑOS AL PARQUE NACIONAL KEOLADEO, BHARATPUR, RAJASTHAN, INDIA Resumen. El Parque Nacional Keoladeo, sitio patrimonio de la humanidad, es famoso por su rica diversidad de aves pero se enfrenta a cortes de agua.
  • British Birds |

    British Birds |

    VOL. LU JULY No. 7 1959 BRITISH BIRDS WADER MIGRATION IN NORTH AMERICA AND ITS RELATION TO TRANSATLANTIC CROSSINGS By I. C. T. NISBET IT IS NOW generally accepted that the American waders which occur each autumn in western Europe have crossed the Atlantic unaided, in many (if not most) cases without stopping on the way. Yet we are far from being able to answer all the questions which are posed by these remarkable long-distance flights. Why, for example, do some species cross the Atlantic much more frequently than others? Why are a few birds recorded each year, and not many more, or many less? What factors determine the dates on which they cross? Why are most of the occurrences in the autumn? Why, despite the great advantage given to them by the prevail­ ing winds, are American waders only a little more numerous in Europe than European waders in North America? To dismiss the birds as "accidental vagrants", or to relate their occurrence to weather patterns, as have been attempted in the past, may answer some of these questions, but render the others still more acute. One fruitful approach to these problems is to compare the frequency of the various species in Europe with their abundance, migratory behaviour and ecology in North America. If the likelihood of occurrence in Europe should prove to be correlated with some particular type of migration pattern in North America this would offer an important clue as to the causes of trans­ atlantic vagrancy. In this paper some aspects of wader migration in North America will be discussed from this viewpoint.
  • India: Tigers, Taj, & Birds Galore

    India: Tigers, Taj, & Birds Galore

    INDIA: TIGERS, TAJ, & BIRDS GALORE JANUARY 30–FEBRUARY 17, 2018 Tiger crossing the road with VENT group in background by M. Valkenburg LEADER: MACHIEL VALKENBURG LIST COMPILED BY: MACHIEL VALKENBURG VICTOR EMANUEL NATURE TOURS, INC. 2525 WALLINGWOOD DRIVE, SUITE 1003 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78746 WWW.VENTBIRD.COM INDIA: TIGERS, TAJ, & BIRDS GALORE January 30–February 17, 2018 By Machiel Valkenburg This tour, one of my favorites, starts in probably the busiest city in Asia, Delhi! In the afternoon we flew south towards the city of Raipur. In the morning we visited the Humayan’s Tomb and the Quitab Minar in Delhi; both of these UNESCO World Heritage Sites were outstanding, and we all enjoyed them immensely. Also, we picked up our first birds, a pair of Alexandrine Parakeets, a gorgeous White-throated Kingfisher, and lots of taxonomically interesting Black Kites, plus a few Yellow-footed Green Pigeons, with a Brown- headed Barbet showing wonderfully as well. Rufous Treepie by Machiel Valkenburg From Raipur we drove about four hours to our fantastic lodge, “the Baagh,” located close to the entrance of Kanha National Park. The park is just plain awesome when it comes to the density of available tigers and birds. It has a typical central Indian landscape of open plains and old Sal forests dotted with freshwater lakes. In the early mornings when the dew would hang over the plains and hinder our vision, we heard the typical sounds of Kanha, with an Indian Peafowl displaying closely, and in the far distance the song of Common Hawk-Cuckoo and Southern Coucal.
  • SHOREBIRDS (Charadriiformes*) CARE MANUAL *Does Not Include Alcidae

    SHOREBIRDS (Charadriiformes*) CARE MANUAL *Does Not Include Alcidae

    SHOREBIRDS (Charadriiformes*) CARE MANUAL *Does not include Alcidae CREATED BY AZA CHARADRIIFORMES TAXON ADVISORY GROUP IN ASSOCIATION WITH AZA ANIMAL WELFARE COMMITTEE Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual Published by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums in association with the AZA Animal Welfare Committee Formal Citation: AZA Charadriiformes Taxon Advisory Group. (2014). Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual. Silver Spring, MD: Association of Zoos and Aquariums. Original Completion Date: October 2013 Authors and Significant Contributors: Aimee Greenebaum: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Vice Chair, Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA Alex Waier: Milwaukee County Zoo, USA Carol Hendrickson: Birmingham Zoo, USA Cindy Pinger: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Chair, Birmingham Zoo, USA CJ McCarty: Oregon Coast Aquarium, USA Heidi Cline: Alaska SeaLife Center, USA Jamie Ries: Central Park Zoo, USA Joe Barkowski: Sedgwick County Zoo, USA Kim Wanders: Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA Mary Carlson: Charadriiformes Program Advisor, Seattle Aquarium, USA Sara Perry: Seattle Aquarium, USA Sara Crook-Martin: Buttonwood Park Zoo, USA Shana R. Lavin, Ph.D.,Wildlife Nutrition Fellow University of Florida, Dept. of Animal Sciences , Walt Disney World Animal Programs Dr. Stephanie McCain: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Veterinarian Advisor, DVM, Birmingham Zoo, USA Phil King: Assiniboine Park Zoo, Canada Reviewers: Dr. Mike Murray (Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA) John C. Anderson (Seattle Aquarium volunteer) Kristina Neuman (Point Blue Conservation Science) Sarah Saunders (Conservation Biology Graduate Program,University of Minnesota) AZA Staff Editors: Maya Seaman, MS, Animal Care Manual Editing Consultant Candice Dorsey, PhD, Director of Animal Programs Debborah Luke, PhD, Vice President, Conservation & Science Cover Photo Credits: Jeff Pribble Disclaimer: This manual presents a compilation of knowledge provided by recognized animal experts based on the current science, practice, and technology of animal management.
  • Attempting to See One Member of Each of the World's Bird Families Has

    Attempting to See One Member of Each of the World's Bird Families Has

    Attempting to see one member of each of the world’s bird families has become an increasingly popular pursuit among birders. Given that we share that aim, the two of us got together and designed what we believe is the most efficient strategy to pursue this goal. Editor’s note: Generally, the scientific names for families (e.g., Vireonidae) are capital- ized, while the English names for families (e.g., vireos) are not. In this article, however, the English names of families are capitalized for ease of recognition. The ampersand (&) is used only within the name of a family (e.g., Guans, Chachalacas, & Curassows). 8 Birder’s Guide to Listing & Taxonomy | October 2016 Sam Keith Woods Ecuador Quito, [email protected] Barnes Hualien, Taiwan [email protected] here are 234 extant bird families recognized by the eBird/ Clements checklist (2015, version 2015), which is the offi- T cial taxonomy for world lists submitted to ABA’s Listing Cen- tral. The other major taxonomic authority, the IOC World Bird List (version 5.1, 2015), lists 238 families (for differences, see Appendix 1 in the expanded online edition). While these totals may appear daunting, increasing numbers of birders are managing to see them all. In reality, save for the considerable time and money required, finding a single member of each family is mostly straightforward. In general, where family totals or family names are mentioned below, we use the eBird/Clements taxonomy unless otherwise stated. Family Feuds: How do world regions compare? In descending order, the number of bird families supported by con- tinental region are: Asia (125 Clements/124 IOC), Africa (122 Clem- ents/126 IOC), Australasia (110 Clements/112 IOC), North America (103 Clements/IOC), South America (93 Clements/94 IOC), Europe (73 Clements/74 IOC ), and Antarctica (7 Clements/IOC).