Rice: Global Networks and New Histories Edited by Francesca Bray, Peter A
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
The John De La Howe Site: a Study of Colonoware on the South Carolina Frontier
W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1998 The John De La Howe Site: A Study of Colonoware on the South Carolina Frontier Margaret W. Cooper College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Cooper, Margaret W., "The John De La Howe Site: A Study of Colonoware on the South Carolina Frontier" (1998). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539626157. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-xjp5-4039 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE JOHN DE LA HOWE SITE: A STUDY OF COLONOWARE ON THE SOUTH CAROLINA FRONTIER A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Anthropology The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Margaret W. Cooper 1998 APPROVAL SHEET this thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts AntVirvr Approved, December 1996 Dr. Norman Barki Dr. Marley wow n III TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv LIST OF FIGURES v LIST OF TABLES vii ABSTRACT viii INTRODUCTION 2 CHAPTER I. THE ORIGINS OF COLONOWARE: PREVIOUS INTERPRETATIONS 7 CHAPTER II. THE SETTLEMENT AND EXPANSION OF SOUTH CAROLINA 16 CHAPTER III. -
NPS Form 10 900 OMB No. 1024 0018
NPS Form 10-900 OM0 No. 1024-0018 (Expires 501/2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "NIA for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional certification comments, entries, and narrative items on continuation sheets if needed (NPS Form 10-900a). 1. Name of Pro~ertv historic name Newington Archaeological Site other nameslsite number VDHR No. 049-0096,44KQ0006 street & number 697 Frazier Ferry Road -(not for publication city or town King and Queen Courthouse vicinity state. Virginia code VA county King and Queen code 097 zip code 23085 3. StatelFederal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this xnomination - request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property xmeets -does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at tve following level(s) of significance: local 7- I/L h'* Date / State or Federal agencylbureau or Tribal Government I In my opinion, the property -meets -does not meet the National Register criteria. -
Tranquil Hill Plantation: the Most Charming Inland Place
TRANQUIL HILL PLANTATION: THE MOST CHARMING INLAND PLACE CHICORA FOUNDATION RESEARCH SERIES 66 TRANQUIL HILL PLANTATION: THE MOST CHARMING INLAND PLACE Research Series 66 Michael Trinkley Debi Hacker With Contributions by: Linda Scott Cummings S. Homes Hogue Robert L. McCain Chicora Foundation, Inc. PO Box 8664 ▪ 861 Arbutus Drive Columbia, SC 29202-8664 803/787-6910 www.chicora.org February 2008 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Trinkley, Michael. Tranquil Hill Plantation : the most charming inland place / Michael Trinkley, Debi Hacker ; with contributions by Linda Scott Cummings, S. Homes Hogue, Robert L. McCain. p. cm. -- (Research series ; 66) Includes bibliographical references. Summary: "This study reports on data recovery excavations at archaeological site 38DR141, Tranquil Hill Plantation in Dorchester County, South Carolina. Investigations include excavation and mechanical stripping at the main house, the slave settlement, a domestic slave settlement to the east, and in the large gardens to the south"--Provided by publisher. ISBN 978-1-58317-065-6 (alk. paper) 1. Tranquil Hill Plantation (S.C.)--Antiquities. 2. Excavations (Archaeology)--South Carolina-- Dorchester County. 3. Tranquil Hill Plantation (S.C.)--History. 4. Dwellings--South Carolina--Dorchester County--History. 5. Plantation life--South Carolina--Dorchester County--History. 6. Slaves--South Carolina--Dorchester County--Social life and customs. 7. Slavery--South Carolina--Dorchester County-- History. 8. Gardens, English--South Carolina--Dorchester County--History. 9. Dorchester County (S.C.)-- Antiquities. 10. Dorchester County (S.C.)--Social life and customs. I. Hacker, Debi. II. Title. F279.T69T75 2008 975.7'94--dc22 2008003614 © 2008 by Chicora Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transcribed in any form without permission of Chicora Foundation, Inc. -
Phase I Cultural Resource Survey of the Omni Commerce Park Berkeley County, South Carolina
PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY OF THE OMNI COMMERCE PARK BERKELEY COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA Final Report Cultural Resources Department February 2012 Phase I Cultural Resource Survey S&ME Project No. 1616-11-507 Omni Commerce Park, Berkeley County, SC February 2012 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY S&ME, Inc. (S&ME), on behalf of MeadWestvaco, Inc., has completed a Phase I cultural resource survey of the proposed Omni Commerce Park located in Berkeley County, South Carolina. The 323-acre property consists of approximately 61 acres of delineated wetlands, 36 acres of buffer area surrounding the wetlands, 100 acres that have been heavily disturbed, and 127 acres of uplands. The wetlands and surrounding buffer areas, which have been set aside as conservation areas, as well as the heavily disturbed areas were excluded from the Phase I survey. Based on the nature of the proposed undertaking and existing topography, the proposed Area of Potential Effects (APE) for the project is considered to be a 0.5-mile radius around the project area. Work for this project was carried out in general accordance with S&ME Proposal Number 1616-8439-11, dated November 11, 2011. The project area is bounded by wooded and private properties to the north, east, and west, and commercial property and Drop Off Road to the south (Figures 1 and 2). The southern portion of the project area (the heavily disturbed portion) contains the remnants of a large greenhouse and nursery that has been razed, as well as the associated catchment ponds. The razed area is currently used by Baucom Grading and their office building is the only remaining structure. -
Cultural Resources Survey of the Elliott Tract, Dorchester County, South Carolina
CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY OF THE ELLIOTT TRACT, DORCHESTER COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA CHICORA RESEARCH CONTRIBUTION 404 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY OF THE ELLIOTT TRACT, DORCHESTER COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA Prepared By: Nicole Southerland, Sarah Fick, And Michael Trinkley, Ph.D., RPA Prepared For: Mr. Kurt Sandness The Sintra Corporation PO Box 2109 Mount Pleasant, SC 29465 CHICORA RESEARCH CONTRIBUTION 404 Chicora Foundation, Inc. PO Box 8664 Columbia, SC 29202-8664 803/787-6910 Email:[email protected] www.chicora.org March 19, 2004 This report is printed on permanent paper ∞ ©2004 by Chicora Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, transmitted, or transcribed in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without prior permission of Chicora Foundation, Inc. except for brief quotations used in reviews. Full credit must be given to the authors, publisher, and project sponsor. ABSTRACT This study reports on an intensive cultural test fill was screened through ¼-inch mesh and the resources survey of a 55 acre tract in the southeast shovel tests were backfilled at the completion of portion of Dorchester County, near the town of the study. A total of 282 shovel tests were Summerville, South Carolina. The work, excavated along 27 transect lines. Additional conducted for the Sintra Corporation, is meant to testing was performed for the identified site. assist this client in complying with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the As a result of these investigations, one regulations codified in 36CFR800. prehistoric site, 38DR224, and one isolated find, 38DR00, were identified. -
9781107044395.Pdf
Rice Global Networks and New Histories Rice today is food to half the world’s population. Its history is inextricably entangled with the emergence of colonialism, the global networks of indus- trial capitalism, and the modern world economy. The history of rice is currently a vital and innovative field of research attracting serious attention, but no attempt has yet been made to write a history of rice and its place in the rise of capitalism from a global and comparative perspective. Rice is a first step toward such a history. The 15 chapters, written by specialists on Africa, the Americas, and several regions of Asia, are premised on the utility of a truly international approach to history. Each one brings a new approach that unsettles prevailing narratives and suggests new connections. Together they cast new light on the significant roles of rice as crop, food, and commodity, tracing how it shaped historical trajectories and interre- gional linkages in Africa, the Americas, Europe, and Asia. Francesca Bray is Professor of Social Anthropology at the University of Edinburgh. She is the author of The Rice Economies: Technology and Development in Asian Societies (1994); Technology and Gender: Fabrics of Power in Late Imperial China (1997); Technology and Society in Ming China, 1368–1644 (2000); and Technology, Gender and History in Imperial China: Great Transformations Reconsidered (2013). Peter A. Coclanis is Albert R. Newsome Distinguished Professor of History and Director of the Global Research Institute at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He is the author of The Shadow of a Dream: Economic Life and Death in the South Carolina Low Country, 1670–1920 (1989)andTime’s Arrow, Time’s Cycle: Globalization in Southeast Asia Over La Longue Durée (2006) and the coeditor of Environmental Change and Agricultural Sustainability in the Mekong Delta (2011). -
Beaufort County Above Ground Historic Resources Survey Beaufort County, South Carolina
Beaufort County Above Ground Historic Resources Survey Beaufort County, South Carolina Brockington and Associates, Inc. Brooker Architectural Design Consultants Historic Beaufort Foundation Preservation Consultants, Inc. 1998 BEAUFORT COUNTY ABOVE-GROUND HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY OF BEAUFORT COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA Prepared for: Beaufort County, South Carolina City of Beaufort, South Carolina Town of Port Royal, South Carolina Brockington and Associates, Inc. Brooker Architectural Design Consultants Historic Beaufort Foundation Preservation Consultants, Inc. April 1998 Beaufort County Above-Ground Historic Resources Survey of Beaufort County, South Carolina Report Prepared for: Beaufort County, South Carolina City of Beaufort, South Carolina Town of Port Royal, South Carolina Prepared by: Bruce G. Harvey Brockington and Associates, Inc. Colin Brooker Brooker Architectural Design Consultants David B. Schneider Historic Beaufort Foundation Sarah Fick Preservation Consultants, Inc. Brockington and Associates, Inc. Brooker Architectural Design Consultants Historic Beaufort Foundation Preservation Consultants, Inc. April 1998 Acknowledgments This has been a large and complex project, and many people have provided invaluable assistance in its completion. Ian Hill, Beaufort County Historic Preservation Planner, served as the Project Manager for Beaufort County, and did a marvelous job at coordinating the various components of this survey. Lena Cofresi, Planner for the City of Beaufort, was likewise very helpful in providing insights and advice. Dan Morgan and Joe Noll, with the Beaufort County GIS program, provided invaluable assistance in producing finished maps from our field maps. In the South Carolina Department of Archives and History, Mary Parramore, Andy Chandler, and Tracy Power were generous in providing information and advice. Our thanks go out to the many individuals who granted us access to their plantations and other private resources. -
Rich Swamps and Rice Grounds: the Specialization of Inland Rice
RICH SWAMPS AND RICE GROUNDS: THE SPECIALIZATION OF INLAND RICE CULTURE IN THE SOUTH CAROLINA LOWCOUNTRY, 1670-1861 by HAYDEN ROS SMITH (Under the Direction of Paul S. Sutter) ABSTRACT This study discusses the environmental and technological complexity of South Carolina inland rice plantations from their inception at the turn of the seventeenth century to their institutional collapse during the Civil War. Inland rice cultivation provided a foundation for the South Carolina colonial plantation complex and enabled planters’ participation in the Atlantic economy, dependence on enslaved labor, and dramatic alteration of the natural landscape. Also, the growing population of enslaved Africans led to a diversely acculturated landscape unique to the Southeastern Coastal Plain. Unlike many historical interpretations that categorize inland rice cultivation in a universal and simplistic manner, this study explains how agricultural systems varied among plantations. By focusing on planters’ and slaves’ alteration of the inland topography, this interpretation emphasizes how agricultural methods met the demands of the local environment. Inland cultivation began as a simple process for growing rice by taking advantage of available sites, yet enslaved laborers spent more energy refining old inland fields and creating new landscapes as the demand for the crop and the land increased. Moreover, planters had to modify a general cultivation model to fit within the diverse landscapes of the Coastal Plain. By paying detailed attention to Lowcountry topography, this study explains how the complex layering of soil and water presented people with a landscape to construct their cultural identity. This study also discusses how rice cultivators worked within these ecological boundaries to construct successful rice plantations and an important global agricultural commodity. -
A Basic Inventory of Archeological Sites in South Carolina July 1, 1971 Revised Edition, July 1, 1972 Robert L
University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Archaeology and Anthropology, South Carolina Research Manuscript Series Institute of 7-1-1972 A Basic Inventory of Archeological Sites in South Carolina July 1, 1971 Revised Edition, July 1, 1972 Robert L. Stephenson Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/archanth_books Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Stephenson, Robert L., "A Basic Inventory of Archeological Sites in South Carolina July 1, 1971 Revised Edition, July 1, 1972" (1972). Research Manuscript Series. 136. https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/archanth_books/136 This Book is brought to you by the Archaeology and Anthropology, South Carolina Institute of at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Research Manuscript Series by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Basic Inventory of Archeological Sites in South Carolina July 1, 1971 Revised Edition, July 1, 1972 Keywords Archeological Sites, South Carolina, Archeology Disciplines Anthropology Publisher The outhS Carolina Institute of Archeology and Anthropology--University of South Carolina Comments In USC online Library catalog at: http://www.sc.edu/library/ This book is available at Scholar Commons: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/archanth_books/136 '-. A BASIC INVENTORY OF ARCHEOLOGICAL SITES IN SOUTH CAROLINA JULY 1, 1971 REVISED :JITION, JULY 1, 1972 Prepared by the Institute of Archeology and Anthropology University of South Carolina Robert L. Stephenson, Director .: . • If':'TRODUCTION TO THE JULY 1, 1972 EDITION This is the first. revision of the Basic Inventory of Archeological Sites (\oi South Carolina. It contains all of the material of the 1971 Edition, in '::cluding the Introduction, plus a listing of the new material that has been r~added to the Institute files in the past twelve months. -
Screven County Community Assessment Joint Comprehensive Plan 2008 - 2028
Screven County Community Assessment Joint Comprehensive Plan 2008 - 2028 Screven County Screven County and Towns of Hiltonia, Newington and Rocky Ford, and City of Oliver Joint Comprehensive Plan 2008 to 2028 Community Assessment Prepared by: 127 F Street Brunswick, Georgia 31520 Telephone (912) 264-7363 Website: www.coastalgeorgiardc.org Screven County and Towns of Hiltonia, Newington and Rocky Ford, and City of Oliver Joint Comprehensive Plan Community Assessment Screven County Board of Commissioners Stan Sheppard, Chairman Will Boyd, Commissioner Gregg Ellison, Commissioner Mickey Evans, Commissioner Dennis Lawton, Commissioner J. C. Warren, Commissioner Roland Stubbs, Commissioner Hiltonia Town Council Oliver City Council Gerry Forehand, Mayor Justine Brown, Mayor Vivian Forehand, Council member Marvin Mock, Council Member Mary Williams, Council member Early Milton, Council Member Eddie Walker, Council member Gary Curtis, Council Member Johnny Holmes, Council member Barbara Lee, Council Member Jerald Newton, Council Member Kathy Weinrick, Council Member Ethel Cooper, Council Member Newington Town Council Rocky Ford Town Council J. Donald Scott, Mayor James W. Hankinson, Mayor Jeanette Clay, Council Member Thad Simmons, Council Member Albert S. Perkins, Council Member Ralph Mock , Council Member Alvin J. “Jack” Mock, Jr., Council Member Barry Durdan, Council Member Jean Perkins, Council Member Fred Ruffin, Council Member Ed Spirko, Council Member Larry Ward, Council Member Screven County Joint Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee Stan Sheppard, Chairman, Screven County Roland Stubbs, Commissioner, Screven County Gerry Forehand, Mayor, Town of Hiltonia J. Donald Scott, Mayor, Town of Newington Justine Brown, Mayor, City of Oliver James Hankinson, Mayor, Town of Rocky Ford Rick Jordan, Screven County Manager Nancy Edenfield, Screven County Chamber of Commerce Gayle Boykin, Screven County Economic Development Authority Dr.