198 9ApJ. . . 347.1034R The AstrophysicalJournal,347:1034-1054,1989December15 © 1989.TheAmericanAstronomicalSociety.Allrightsreserved.PrintedinU.S.A. tering fromtheircopiousnumberoffreeelectrons.However, are potentialsourcesoflinearpolarizationviaThomsonscat- masses. (SeeBastien1989foradiscussionofretogradeorbits binaries, variousparametersarededuced,suchastheinclina- several singleWRstarsand+Obinarysystems.For the Paper I)containsgoodexamplesofpolarimetricbehavior net polarizationdifferingfromzerocanonlybeobservedinthe which werenotcorrectlyinterpretedatthetimeofPaper I.) tion oftheorbitalplane,whichleadstoestimatesstellar relative distributionofthelightsource(s)andscatterers. total lightfromthestarasaconsequenceofasymmetriesin The identificationoftime-dependentpolarimetricvariations in single WRstars(Drissenetal.1987;hereafterPaperII) pro- vides ausefulnewwaytoinvestigateintrinsicasymmetries in of binaries,tocalculatethemass-lossrate(M)WRcom- propose anewmethod,basedonthepolarizationmodulation the WRwindstructure.InPaperHI,St.-Louisetal.(1988) bright WRstarsinCygnus.Polarimetric dataoftheWR+O ponents. binary V444Cyg(HD193576), whichshowsapolarization 1 The firstpaperofthisseries(St.-Louisetal.1987;hereafter Because oftheirhot,intensewinds,Wolf-Rayet(WR) VisitingAstronomer,Universityof Arizona Observatories. This paperpresentspolarimetric dataforsevenoftheeight POLARIZATION VARIABILITYAMONGWOLF-RAYETSTARS.V.LINEAROF Wolf-Rayet(WR)stars.ThesixWRstarsHD191765,192103,192163,192641, HD 190918behavesasexpectedforalong-periodWR+Osystemwithanellipticalorbit.Theeighthstar, HD 193077,and193793,showonlyrandom,low-amplitudemodulationontimescalesofhourstodays. V444 Cyg(HD193576),istheonlyshort-periodWR+ObinaryinCygnussampleandtreateddetail WR starsofvariousspectralsubtypes.Weconfirmaprevioussuspicionthatthedegreerandom,intrinsic especially forWNstars(comparedtoWCstars). caused bythepresenceofpropagatingblobs,whichform,survive,and/orgrowmoreeasilyinslowerwinds, scatter inpolarizationiscorrelatedwithspectralsubclassandterminalwindvelocity.Thisproposedtobe minal andthermalwindvelocities,themass-lossrate,stellarcoreradius.Itisnotclearifobserva- instability. Thismodelleadstoacorrelationbetweenthepolarizationscatterandcombinationofter- growth ratepredictedbyOwocki,Castor,andRybickifortheamplitudeofaradiativelydrivenline-shape 1 tions reproducethiscorrelation,becauseofuncertaintiesinthestellarparameters._ Subject headings:polarization—stars:binarieswindsWolf-Rayet wind velocity.Thismodelfitsthedatabetter,especiallyforWNstars,butisstillfarfromcompelling. tial ofthewindpropagatingtime.ThistimeisproportionaltoWRcoreradiusdividedbyterminal perturbation itself(ofunknownorigin),yieldsacorrelationbetweenthepolarizationscatterandexponen- u Carmelle Robert,AnthonyF.J.Moffat,PierreBastien,LaurentDrissen,andNicoleSt.-Louis © American Astronomical Society • Provided by the NASA Astrophysics Data System We reportprecisionbroad-bandbluelightmonitoringinlinearpolarizationofseventheeightbright The polarizationdatafortheeightbrightCygnusWRstarsarecombinedwithsimilar18other We developtwomodelstoexplaintheoriginofblobs.Thefirstmodelisbasedonexponential Another simpler,butmoreadhocmodel,whichrelatesthegrowthrateofdispersiontosize THE BRIGHTCYGNUSSTARSANDANANTICORRELATIONOFVARIABILITY I. introduction Département dePhysique,UniversitéMontréal;andObservatoireAstronomiqueduMontMégantic Received 1988June1;accepted198919 WITH WINDSPEED ABSTRACT 1034 eclipse ofthescatterers,istreatedmoreextensivelyina Cygnus WRstars,theoverallsampleofstarsmonitoredso separate paper(Robertetal.1989;hereafterPaperVI). far inhigh-precisionpolarimetryisnowcompleteforthewhole are nowrepresented. sky toF=9.2mag.Furthermore,mostoftheWRsubtypes cedures fortheeightbrightCygnusWRstars,includingV444 in §111.Theoverallsignificanceoftheintrinsicpolarimetric Cyg, aregivenin§II.Adiscussionofindividualstarsfollows were firstcollectedin1984MayandNovemberatthreediffer- § IV.AsummaryisgiveninV. variations inthenewlargesampleofobjectsissubject of ent telescopes:the1.52mofMountLemmon(Arizona), the carried outforthewholesample ofstarswiththe1.55mtele- Cygnus WRstarsarelistedinTable1.Theseparameterswere scope ofMountBigelowand the 1.02and1.52mtelescopesof Mégantic (Québec).In1985 Octobermeasurementswere gathered mainlyfromthecatalogofvanderHuchtetal.(1981). in 1986October.Mostofthe observations weremadewiththe during anothervisittothe1.02 mtelescopeofMountLemmon Mount Lemmon.Theobservations werethencompleted 1.55 mofMountBigelow(Arizona),andthe1.60Mont With thenewpolarimetricobservationsforeightbright The observationsandadiscussionofthereductionpro- Polarimetric dataforoneobjectpresentedhere,HD192163, The spectraltypesandthemagnitudesofeightbright II. OBSERVATIONSANDANALYSIS 198 9ApJ. . .347.1034R arized starswerealsoobservedinordertocalibratetheorigin polarization wasthenappropriatelysubtracted).Manypol- at MontMégantic,wherePi„s^0.15%;thisinstrumental instrumental polarization(P<0.010%)foreachrun(except it wassomewhatworsein1984. obtained in~15minutesforeachobject1985and1986, diaphragm of~10"diameter.Aprecision<7<0.015%was (centered at4700ÂwithaFWHMbandpassof1800Â)using surements weremadethroughablueCorningfilter4-96 type describedbyAngelandLandstreet(1970).Allthemea- University ofArizona.Onlyafewdata(thosefromMont Mégantic) werecollectedwithaPockelscellpolarimeterofthe t inst MINIPOL polarimeter(FreckerandSerkowski1965)ofthe P (see texttordetails).^ an O-typecompanion.TheabsorptionlinesofHD192641and193077havealsobeenproposed,somewhatlessconclusively,toariseinOstarcompanion 193793. 193576. 193011. 192641. 192163. 192103. 191765. 190918. The observationsofunpolarizedstarsrevealednegligible Note. ThecatalogofvanderHuchtetal.1981classifiedHD193793asaWC7+abssystem.Nowthereisgoodevidencefortheabsorptionlinestobedue HD © American Astronomical Society • Provided by the NASA Astrophysics Data System WR 140 139 138 137 136 135 134 133 WC7 +04V WN5 +06 WN5 +abs WC7 +abs WN6 WC8 WN6 WN4.5 +09.5la Spectral Type POLARIZATION VARIABILITYAMONGWRSTARS.V. General InformationfortheEightBrightCygnusWRStars (mag) 7.4 8.6 8.5 8.3 8.0 8.5 8.6 7.6 b 0.402 0.688 0.225 0.954 0.472% 1.367 1.175 1.450 0.033 0.032 0.030 0.027 0.023 0.023 0.044 0.024%